ML20011D968
| ML20011D968 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1989 |
| From: | COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20011D967 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9001030253 | |
| Download: ML20011D968 (19) | |
Text
.
y1 .
OS Core Operattag Limits Report for LaSalle County Station Unit 1, Reload 3 (Cycle 4) i
)
9001030253 891222 N'DR ADOCK 05000373 p PDC 2lIREP
. .i
- w. ;
} .
.. t CORE OPERATING LIMITE REPORT t
- Iannancz or enamazz sinantr i 5 l
l l
I l
Affected Affected Date l Reetlen P-- = Bi-- ev a f ek ===a ,
i 111 111- Orlain=1 famna (cvela 4) 12/89 i l
l t
4 i
i i 1 T
LaSalle County - Unit 1 i Cycle 4 !
1
.s , ,
+
j 3
l i
J CORE OPERATING LIMITE RDORT TABLE OF CGfTENTE ,
t F.SSR REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .. . . . .~.:.. . ... 111 iv LIST OF FIGURE 8 . . . . . . . - . . . . . ....... ...... ... ,
v, LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . .. . . . . . .
1.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR REAT GENERATICII RATE (3/4.2.1) . . .... 1-1 1.1 Technical Specification Reference . . . . .-. . ... 1-1 1.2- Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .... 1-1 .
4
- 2.0 MINIMUM CRITICAL PONER RATIO (3/4.2.3). ... ..... .... 2-1 2.1 Technical Specification Reference . . < . .--. . ... 2-1 2.2 Description . . . . . .... . ...... . . ... 2-1 3.0 LINEAR NEAT GI2tERATICEI RATE (3/4.2.4) .. . . . . - . . . .... 3-1 3.1 Technical Specificat' ion Reference . . .. . .. .. . 3-1 3.3 Description . . .
- . .. .... . .... . .-. ... 3 .
4.0 CCEtTROL ROD WITHDRAWAL BLOCK INSTRUNI2tTATION (3/4.3.6) . ... . 4-1 4.1 Technical. Specification Reference . . - . . . ... . . . 4-1 4.2 Description . . . . . . .... . .. . ... ..... 4-1
. LaSalle County - Unit 1 11 Cycle 4 i
i 1 i,
- l
I 1
s- .
h COSE OPERATIEG LIMITE REPORT REFERENCEE f
- 1. Comunonwealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-374, LaSalle County Station, Unit 1 racility Operating License, License No. NPF-11.
- 2. Letter from D. M. Crutchfield to All Power Reactor Licensees and Applicants, Generic Letter 88-16s.Concernitg the Removal of' Cycle-Specific r Parsmoter Limits from Technical Specifications, dated October 4, 1988.
t
- 3. Supplemental Reload License Submittal for LaSalle County Station, Unit 1.
Reload 3 (Cycle 4), 23A5972, Rev. O, June 1989. ,
- 4. LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2, SAFER /GESTR LOCA Loss-of-Coolant-Accident Analysis, NEDC, 31510P (latest approved version).
- 5. General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel (GESTAR),
, NEDE-24011-P-A (latest approved version).
l 1 -
i LaSalle County - Unit 1 111 Cycle 4 l
ZNLEP
~ -
i i
a I
core OPERATING LIMITS REPORT
~
LIET or PfaumEE l
t Frentar -rvt rmaar arrritzr Egg 1.2-1 Masistum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate 1-2 .[
(MAPLEGR) vs.. Average _ Planar Esposure, Initial Core < ~
Fuel Type 8CR3219..
1,2-2 Masistan Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate 1-3.
(MAPLEGR) vs. Average Planar Esposure for Fuel Type 7 BP8CRB2990.
e i
1.2-3 Masistan Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate 1-4
- '(MAPLEGR) vs. Average Planar Esposure for Fuel Type.
BC301A. -3 l
l 1.2-4 Masimum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate 1-5 (MAPLEGR) vs. Average Plamaa Esposure for Fuel Type BC3205.
1.2-5 Masistan Average Planar Linear Beat Generation Rate 1-6 (MAPLEGR) vs. Average Planar- Espos'tre for Fuel Type NBC301G.
1.2-6 Maximian Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate 1-7 (MAPLEGR) vs. Average Planar Esposure for Fuel Type NBC325A.
2.2-1 Power Distribution Limits, MCPR vs. T at Rated Flow. 2-2
(
2.2-2 Power Distribution Limits, MCPR vs. T at Rated Flow, 2-3 EOC-RPT Inoperable and Main Turbine Bypass Inoperable.
2.2-3 Kf Facter vs. Core Flow % 2-4 l
l LaSalle County - Unit 1 iv, Cycle 4 l
I f .
4 CORE OPERATING LIMITE REPORT LIET OF TABLEE tsar
- TTTr.r inenestyTreur g 4.2 1 Control Rod Withdrawal Block.Instrianestation Setpoints. 4-1 l i
P i
I i
l l
l l
l I.
I t
i i
).
i:
1 i
j LaSalle County - Unit 1 y . Cycle 4 _1 4
0
, . . . , - , e,
i i
, f r
i CORE OPERATIEG LIMITE REPORT ,
, 1.O AyynAnE PLAHR LIEE&B EEAT GENERTI N RATE f3/4.2.11 4
1.1 TEcERICAL EPECIFICATIGE REFERENCE Technical Specification 3.2.1. l
- l. 1.2 DESCRIPTIGE: .;
The Masistas Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rates (MAPLEGE) versus Average Planar Esposure for fuel: type i
8CRS219 is determined from Figure 1.2-1.
The Masistan Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rates (MAPLEGE) versus Average Planar Esposure for fuel tYp*
BPSCRB299L'is determined from Figure 1.2 2.
The Masista Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rates (MAPLEGR) versus Average Planar Esposure for. fuel type BC301A is determined from Figure 1.2-3.
The Masistas Average Planar Linear Heat Genera
- ion Rates (MAPLEGR) versus Average Planar-Esposure for fuel type -
BC3208 is determined from Figure 1.2-4.
l The Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rates l (MAPLEGR) versus Average Planar Esposure for fuel type NBC30lG is determined from Figure 1.2-5.
l The Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rates l (MAPLEGR) versus Average Planar Esposure for fuel type NBC325A is determined from Figure 1.2-6.-
i -
LaSalle County - Unit 1 1-1 Cycle 4 ZWLEP
i! l ! !:! !! l ; : :
e#1ckE 0 0
0 -
0 4
- ) 0 R 0 0
G 5
- H 3
- L P9 A1 (B
M2 (\ 0 0
0 t
eR 0 0 3
a8 )
R T n pe S
/ -
oy \ 0 d i
ta T 0
0 W rl e e 5
2 (M 1 n u e eF r
u -
G r s 2 o \ 0 o 0 p 1 t f 0 x a 0 E e ee r 2
r r H u
)
t f a u r s /
W n g ao e p k
( 00 0000 l a i F _
R 12.! P 22k11062.0 0 -
i n x G H 111 I11 1 0 0 e LE L P 5 g
- r r A I
1 a
r a a n n I
e v
. l a a l
)
t s
A PP /
d 0
0 ee gg Ne
(
0 0 0 o000 0
0 1
0 a a r r ee t
s o
p 15 0
0N000 0
1 00 50n 23a v v E x
AA 0
. msv u
0 0
5 i
M m
x a
0
' 7 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 5 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 o
eE c5 cy = - V*
l - ' ,
c.i
9 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR;e .
l:. vs Average Planar Exposure for Fuel Type BP80RB299L i .
g 2 E ^
12.50 # '
- N I 12.00 t
/ \
11.50
. m
< / N .
/ Exposte(NWdist) NAPLHGSW/ft) \
y
~ ca 5 10.50 1
5000 1 00 11.80
\\
10000 Iuo 1 2 '
2 0 I! 0
!!8: 88-45000 9.20 9.50 9.00 N
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 ,
3 Average anar Exposure 'WWd/ST[ .
$ Figure 1.2-2
m Maximum Average P anar Linear Heat Generation Rate MAPLHGR; e .
E vs Average Planar Exposure for Fuel Type B0301 A i k
sg .
h .
a / N ' ;;13J%T==_ i
/ N TlLTJ4""ma 1
/ \ b I
$11 Exposse(NWd/st) NAPLHGR(kW/ft) x T N10 20b N$3 g 3000 12.24 %
4000 12.56
<9 5000 12.90 10000 13.40 12500 13.43 8 35000 10.69 45000 8.79 \
7 50000 6.55
\
S 6
l 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 3
Average anar ~xposure 'WWd/S
,c
- I Figure 1.2-3
Maximum Average Planar Linear Hea Generation Rate MAPLHGR; e =-
~
} .
vs Average Planar Exposure for Fue Type B0320B i -
g
- K=
~ . , _ s g =:
= "
THIS IS TE CIMIERVATIVE 5 '
_R 13 CassoGITE or iuE LAvTim _
/
[ SPECIFC CURUES False 0 IN 12
/ < GE DOCHENT NEDC-33510P. l E C W MONI M ING C W _
Rll
/ Exposse(mwd /st) ~
DOES UTILI2E THE LATTim SPECIFIC AF AGR LIMITS.
l MAPLHGR(kW/ft)
I $ 0.0 11.20
,=
T E10 cs
- m 11.86 N i 5
%9 4000 7000 8000 12.09 12.77 12.90
\ N ,
- 3E 10000 12500 13.08 13.02 h
8- 35000 1012
\ !
i 45000- 8.55-l 50000 8.04 i
6 \
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000- 40000 45000 50000 Average Planar Ex)osure t 'WWd/ST'j IE Figure 1.2-4
Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR) e :-
! vs Average P anar Exposure for Fuel Type NBC301G i .
& E C
E 14 i i.... i 5 .
13
' N ' ' " "
/
12
\ \
EEiIC E iM MONIMINS CODEI EsiE. i N
/ DDES UTILI2E THE BATTIE SPECIFIC Aft _HGR LIMITS.
i h
d5,10 Exposse(Ed/st) 200 IIAPLNGR(kWlft) 11.03 N
x E$g 2000 11.
M 5000 12.58
\
10000 13.35
- 8 12500 13.30
\ i 15000 12.97 7 tm 12.33 25000 11.70 h i 35000 10.32 6 45000
\
8.99 x 5 i 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000~ 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 55000 60000 Average 'lanar Exposure 'WWd/Sj
.e i Figure 1.2-5
9
- a Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate MAPLHGR) g -
5 vs Average Planar Exposure for Fuel Type NB0325A y ..
xc .
14 &
ir -
Idia,N" g a
===,,
12- / N 70s'R""'"'".,fi
/ suciric anma units.
Y '
Exposwe(Ndist) IIAPLHGR(kmftl N 7 1 1.
0 q
% 5000 10000 11 7 12.74 h
l 2 8 12500 13.01
\
15000 1219
\
7 20000 12.17 \
25000 11.52 35000 10.21 6 45000 8.54 '
1 5 i 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 M M N M M M 3
Average anar Enosure [WWd/S";
i Figure 1.2-6
. l
. ,, l l
l ca p QPERATIES LIMITE REPORT '
2.0 MINItant CRITICAL PONER RATIO f 1/4.2.31 2.1 TEcERIc1L RPECIFICATICEI REFERENCE Technical Specification 3.2.3.
j 2.2 DESCRIPTIfM l
i A. Ringle Raeirenlatina Lany Operatian j The MCFR limit when in Slagle Recirculation Loop '{
Operation is' determined from Figure 2.2-1.plus 0.01, times the Kf factor determined from Figure 2.2-3.
l
- b. Two nacirenlation Lonp operation I
The MCPR limit when.in Dual Recirculation Loop Operation is determined from Figure 2.2-1 times the Rf factor. determined from Figure 2.2-3. j
- c. 'f%re Raeirenlatlan f. ann Onaratlan with Main Turb4na Ernans Innparahla i
The MCPR-limit when in Dual Recirculation Loop. !
Operation with the Main Turbine Bypass Inoperable (per Technical Specification 3.7.10) is determined from Figure 2.2-2 times the Kf-factor determined from-3 Figure 2.2-3. ;
- d. Twa Raeirenimelan Loan onarmelan v'Ith end-af-cvela Raeirculmelan Pune Trin Eva*mm funnerable The MCPR limit when.in Dual Recirculation Loop j operation with the End-of-Cycle Recirculation Pump ;
Trip System (RFT) Inoperable (per Technical l Specification 3.3.4.2) is determined from Figure 2.2-2 times the Kf factor determined from Figure 2.2-3.
LaSalle County - Unit 1 2 Cycle 4 ENLEP j u
Power Distribution Limits .
r-HCPR g 1:i 1.340-- -
a 3
T &
w ,
~.--
5 g; -
1.320-- ;
BC301G/BC325A /
' /
!y 2:
1.300
'y-M /
1.280 - '
8CR219/BP805299L - '
.- / *'
'. /
1.260 -
BC301A/BC3208 1.240 .
.687 .700 .720 .740 .760. .780 .800 .820 .840 .860 y ^
WC)R versusT at Rated : low Figure 2.2-1
_ . ~ , . _ _ . ._ __ _ ,,- , . . . . ,. ,. . . . . _ .
Power DistributionI.imits _
MCPR - E00S ,R h (All fuel types)
,r
,c 1.380-1
)
5 a;
/ ;;. -
1.360 - -
I i E00-RPTInoperable ,
/
1.340 - I i m
/
/
- 25 l4 =s ,/-
1.320= /
Main Turbine Bypassinoperable
'y
- i
,/
i 1.300 -
y 1.280 ,
lI .687 .700 .720 .740 .760 .780 .800 .820 .840 .860
! WCPR versus t'a Ra"ed flow Figure 2.2-2 l
Core Operating Limits Reperi i a 8
/
/ .
l /
l l 8 -
/
w E l
. 2
/
.i / -g t
/
u /
=-
o ./ o
^
- e /
l id! l l )
o g/
i
/ g=
c'>
a l t<a ' 5ll f u 8 " cw vc a.a
/
/ -
2 .u w /
e =
o e =n l
l u E
/ o
=
l M i
/ d
/ Ei!
e
/
/
/ .
/ l m '
/
/
3 9
8 8 M 8 E
- - - o r)
LaSale-Unit 1 2-4 Cycl e4 -
._- _-_--___ -__ _, __~ __ _ - _ ,
J] ;
j
-1 .
J CORE OPERATING LIMITE RDORT .j l
i 3.O LINEAR EFAT GEEEthTIGE BATE i3/4.2.$ }
3.1 TREENIciL EFECIFICATI N REFFRENcp f Technical Specification 3.2.4.
3.2 DESCRIPTIM
- a. The LEGE limit is 13.4 kw/ft for fuel types
- 1. 8CES219-
- 2. BPOCES299L ,
t
- b. The LEGR limit is 14.4 kw/ft for. fuel typees 1.- BC301A
- 2. MC3208
- 3. NBC301G ,
i 4. -NBC325A l
l .
l i
6
. LaSalle County - Unit 1 3-1 Cycle 4 l
l M '
4
.s .i
'l l
l Cone OPERATING LIMITE RESORT l
l 4.O CCETROL ROD MITEDRAMAL Bract IMRTEEBerTkTIGE I1/4.3.8) 4.1 TECEffcAL EFECIFIc1TIGr REFERENCE ,
Technical Specification Table 3.3.6 2. ,
4.2 DESC117 Tim
- a. The Rod Block Monitor Upscale Instrumentation Setpoints are ,
determined from the relationships shown in Table 4.2-1. ,
M cmTaot non WnuDanmar. nr.rrr fuRTumerraTIGr SETroInTs :
- TRIP FmicTIGE TRIP SETFOINT ALIZEfARLE VAIRE 1.0 nod BLOCI MaffTOR ' -
A. UPSCALE .v
- i
- 1. Two Recirculation 1 0.66 W + 41 %** 1 0.66 W + 44 s** ~
Loop Operation '
- 2. Single Recirculation 1 0.66 W + 35.7%** 1 0.66 W + 38.7%*
Loop Operation
. **- Clamped, with an allowable value not to escoed the allowable value for recirculation loop flow (W) of 100%. I LaSalle County - Unit 1 4-1 . Cycle-4
._. _ . . . __.._..._.__._:.. . _ _ . . . . , _ . - . _ _ _ . _ _ . .. _......:._.._ _,