ML19032A105

From kanterella
Revision as of 05:55, 30 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Slides for Public Meeting with Industry Representatives Regarding Operator Licensing
ML19032A105
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/13/2019
From: Brian Tindell
NRC/NRR/DIRS/IOLB
To:
Tindell B, NRR/DIRS, 301-415-2026
References
Download: ML19032A105 (12)


Text

Public Meeting with Industry Operator Licensing Representatives February 13, 2019

Agenda

  • Introduction and Opening Remarks
  • K/A Catalogs Revision
  • Operating Test Grading
  • Requalification Inspection Program Revision
  • Topics from Industry
  • Public Comment
  • Adjourn 2

Regulatory Guide 1.8 Revision

  • Qualification Comments for Resolution:

- RP Manager, Middle Manager

- Operator

  • Publication Schedule 3

GFE

  • GFE Working Group

- Members from headquarters, TTC, and Regions

  • Evaluate GFE Options

- Schedule flexibility

- Efficiency

- Change Management

- Technical Basis

- Industry Involvement

  • Recommendation to Management

- May 2019

  • Commission SECY
  • Implement Commission Direction 4

K/A Catalogs Revision

  • Resolved discrepancies
  • Publication Schedule 5

Operating Test Grading Considering feasibility and options for transitioning away from competency-based scenario grading towards a more simplified, performance-based approach in order to:

- Improve regulatory alignment - no requirement exists to grade operating tests based on the cause of an error

- Focus on required actions and task standards for each scenario event

- Clarify guidance for identification of critical tasks

- Shift TS evaluation to the admin JPM portion of the exam

- Simplify post-examination results and documentation

- Provide flexibility for new reactors where certain NUREG-1021 competencies may not apply 6

NUREG-1021 Revision Objective: Consolidate and streamline examiner standards for ease of use and maintenance purposes Focus: NUREG-1021 contains the information necessary to prepare, evaluate, proctor and grade written examinations and operating tests required in 10CFR55.41, §55.43 and §55.45.

Relocate unrelated information to guidance documents Details: Stand alone sections facilitate future revisions because they can be revised independently (Similar to NUREG-0800 structure)

Additional: Improve guidance on Critical Tasks and create placeholder for Advanced Reactor examinations (i.e., NuScale SMR) 7

Requalification Inspection

  • Inspection Procedure Revision - Effective January 1
  • Requalification written examination guidance
  • Direct Look-up Definition: For open-reference questions, if the question stem provides the reference title and/or number and the correct answer requires no understanding, application, analysis, or problem solving, but simply requires the ability to find the information in the reference, then the question is likely a direct look-up.
  • Non-Credible Distractor: For open-reference questions, if the question stem provides the reference title and/or number and a distractor can be easily eliminated because it is not located anywhere in the reference, then that distractor should be considered not credible.
  • Requalification cycle to cycle examination security guidance
  • Written: Biennial requalification written examinations differ from one 24-month requalification program to the next so that 55.49 requirements and licensee program requirements for equitable and consistent examinations are met.
  • Operating Test: Annual requalification operating tests differ from year to year so that 55.49 requirements and licensee program requirements for equitable and consistent examinations are met.

8

Requalification Inspection

  • Effective January 1
  • Pointer to Appendix M (Qualitative) for examination security issues
  • Simulator fidelity issues:

9

OL Program Vision

  • Ultimately, it is the goal of the operator licensing program to ensure that all qualified applicants, and only qualified applicants, receive a license.
  • NRC is confident that it has experienced and qualified examiners implementing an effective and time-proven program to consistently meet this objective.
  • NRC recognizes the need to evaluate transformational initiatives with the potential to increase program efficiency.
  • NRC will continue to strive to enhance consistency and develop best practices across all four regions.

10

Topics from Industry 11

Public Comment 12