ML070080404

From kanterella
Revision as of 11:47, 23 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2006/12/29-Comment (8) Submitted by the University of Missouri Research Reactor, Ralph A. Butler on Proposed Rules 2, 30, 40, 50, 52, 60, 63, 70, 71, 73, 76, and 150 Regarding Protection of Safeguards Information
ML070080404
Person / Time
Site: University of Missouri-Columbia
Issue date: 12/29/2006
From: Rhonda Butler
Univ of Missouri - Columbia
To:
NRC/SECY/RAS
Ngbea E
References
71FR64003 00008, PR-150, PR-2, PR-30, PR-40, PR-50, PR-52, PR-60, PR-63, PR-70, PR-71, PR-73, PR-76, RIN 3150-AH57
Download: ML070080404 (2)


Text

Research Reactor Center. 1513 Research Park Drive Columbia, MO 652 11 University of Missouri-Columbia PHONE (573) 882-4211 PR 2,30,40,50,52,60,63A7,71,7I,7 and 150 FAx (573) 882-6360 (71 FR64003) WEBSITE http://web.m-issouri.edu/-murrwww December 29, 2006 DOCKETED UISNRC January 4, 2007 (11:29am)

Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conumission OFFICE OF SECRETARY Washington, DC 20555-0001 RULEMAKINGS AND Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications StaffAJUITONSAF

Reference:

Docket No. 50-186 University of Missouri-Columbia Research Reactor Facility License R- 103

Subject:

Comments regarding Federal Register notice dated October 31, 2006 "Protection of Safeguards Information" (RIN 3 150-AH57)

The University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR) managemnent understands and supports the continuing efforts to assure the safet y and security for Radioactive Materials (RAM) both at locations of use and during transportation. Our comments will focus specifically on the potential problems the NRC may wish to consider with respect to implementation of Safeguards Information-Modified requirements for the "new" Category 2 RAMQC from Table I-1, Quantities of Concern Thresholds.

Category 2 RAMQC thresholds are a factor of 100 lower than Category 1 RAMQC and most likely will introduce the requirements for SGI security to a wide set of organizations that have little experience with these requirements. The introduction of SGI requirements may unintentionally result in the disruption of treatment for patients, as shippers of these materials may be intimidated by the new security regulations.

T he preparation, packaging and shipping of RAM is a complex process which is highly regulated to assure safety during transportation. Documentation of the preparation and packaging for a RAM shipment consists of a number of sheets which become part of the shipping documents. If we interpret the regulations correctly, some of these sheets would need to be segregated from the package (e.g., page 2 and 5 of a 12 page shipping document) and assigned a cover page indicating that they include SGI-M information. This would add confusion to the shipping documentation and could be counter productive to security as it will highlight information that may otherwise be dispersed throughout the shipping documents.

Shipment of RAM often requires the coordination of multiple carriers and modes of transportation to provide timely delivery. It is unclear how the originator of a RAMQC Category 2 will be able to assure that each carrier meets the requirements to handle SGI-M.

That determination must be made at each step of the custody of such RAMQC shipments, with the possible result being a shipment being delayed or stopped from its intended destination.

1 rimr lap-c=~. 5EC(I-o(V7" FIGHTING CANCER ITrH To~ioRow's TECHNOLOGY -0 L

Page 2 December 29, 2006 We understand that schedules and itineraries of a shipment (which combine route and quantity information with specific timing and security of a shipment) constitute information that, if disclosed, could reduce the security of spent fuel shipments or other high radioactivity shipmnts

(~g.,ateg ry RA QC.-These shipments are not routine and require special communications, coordination and monitoring. For the more routine RAM shipments for Category 2 RAMQC, it is not clear that relevant security -information will accompany these shipments.

Particularly confusing is th e statement in Section 73.23, Protection of Safeguards Information-Modified Handling: Specific Requirements at page 64063 of Federal Register, Vol. 71, No.2 10, third column, last paragraph is the statement that "Scheduling and itinerary information used for the purpose of preplanning, coordination and advance notification may be shared with others on a "need to know" basis and need not be designated as Safeguards Information-Modified Handling" Perhaps the subject of extending SGI-M requirements to new Category 2 RAMQC should await more discussions and understanding of the impact this may have on commerce and specifically medical RAM shipments. The ability for shippers to meet these requirements would certainly be benefited by DHS initiatives in progress, such as the Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) Program before implementing these new security requirements for RAMQC Category 2 shipments.

If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at (573)882-4211 or Walt Meyer at (573)882-5203.

Sincerely, Ralph A. Butler, P.E.

Director, MIIRR RAB :dcs cc: Al Adams, NRC