ML13002A421

Final Report, Kld TR-522, Rev. 1, Development of Evacuation Time Estimates, Appendix H-55 Through End

ML13002A421
Person / Time
Site:	Wolf Creek
Issue date:	10/31/2012
From:	KLD Engineering, PC
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Wolf Creek
References
RA 12-0126 KLD TR-522, Rev 1
Download: ML13002A421 (100)

Text

Figure H-51. Region R51 H-55 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-55 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure H-52. Region R52 H-56 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-56 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure H-53. Region R53 H-57 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-57 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I Figure H-54. Region R54 H-58 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-58 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I Figure H-55. Region R55 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-59 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure H-56. Region R56 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-60 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure H-57. Region R57 H-61 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-61 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I Figure H-58. Region R58 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-62 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure H-59. Region R59 H-63 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-63 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure H-60. Region R60 H-64 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-64 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I Figure H-61. Region R61 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-65 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure H-62. Region R62 H-66 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-66 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure H-63. Region R63 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-67 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 APPENDIX J Representative Inputs to and Outputs from the DYNEV II System J. REPRESENTATIVE INPUTS TO AND OUTPUTS FROM THE DYNEV II SYSTEM This appendix presents data input to and output from the DYNEV II System. Table J-1 provides the volume and maximum residual queues for the two signalized intersections in the study area. A residual queue exists at the start of the RED signal indication, indicating that the demand could not be entirely served by the GREEN phase. A zero residual queue indicates that the traffic movement is under-saturated (i.e., not congested) throughout the duration of evacuation.

Refer to Table K-2 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each intersection.

The decision to install a signal at an intersection is based upon "warrants" that are specified in the Manual of Traffic Control Devices'.

A total of 9 warrants are presented; most of these require that significant traffic volumes are serviced through the intersection in order to justify the expense of installing a signal. Thus, the vast majority of signals are installed at grade intersections that would service the heaviest volumes of traffic during an evacuation.

The low population density and limited traffic volume in the study area results in fewer than ten signalized intersections.

Table J-2 provides source (vehicle loading) and destination information for several roadway segments (links) in the analysis network. Refer to Table K-1 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each link.Table J-3 provides network-wide statistics (average travel time, average speed and number of vehicles) for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) for each scenario.

As expected, Scenarios 8 and 11, which are snow scenarios, exhibit the slowest average speed and longest average travel times.Table J-4 provides statistics (average speed and travel time) for the major evacuation routes -US-75, 121h Road, 1 1 th Road, 16th Road and 17th Road -for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) under Scenario 1 conditions.

As discussed in Section 7.3 and shown in Figures 7-3 through 7-5, there is minimal congestion in the EPZ and all evacuation route speeds are essentially operating at free flow speed for the duration of the evacuation.

Table J-S provides the number of vehicles discharged and the cumulative percent of total vehicles discharged for each link exiting the analysis network, for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) under Scenario 1 conditions.

Refer to Table K-1 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each link.Figure J-1 through Figure J-14 plot the trip generation time versus the ETE for each of the 14 Scenarios considered.

The distance between the trip generation and ETE curves is the travel time. Plots of trip generation versus ETE are indicative of the level of traffic congestion during evacuation.

For low population density sites, the curves are close together, indicating short travel times and minimal traffic congestion.

For higher population density sites, the curves are 1 MUTCD: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/pdfs/2OO9rlr2/part4.pdf Wolf Creek Generating Station J-1 KLD En~ineerin2.

P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate I Rev. 1 farther apart indicating longer travel times and the presence of traffic congestion.

As seen in Figure J-1 through Figure J-14, the curves are close together as a result of the minimal traffic congestion in the EPZ, which was discussed in detail in Section 7.3.Table J-1. Characteristics of the Two Signalized Intersections Toa Mx.Tr Ineseto Aprah Vlm uu 142 1 0 6 US-75 & 11th Lane/W Neosho St Actuated 163 89 0 153 547 0 224 177 0 TOTAL 814 143 1 0 162 32 0 144 US-75 & Cross St Actuated 146 125 0 145 20 0 TOTAL 178 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Table J-2. Sample Simulation Model Input Vehicles.0 Enterin.g 8166 1,698 203 323 NE 8067 1,698 8064 1,698 8038 4,500 390 12 SE 8214 1,698 8048 1,698 8214 1,698 272 57 SW 8048 1,698 8021 1,698 8038 4,500 352 21 W 8021 1,698 8022 4,500 8038 4,500 333 16N 8022 4,500 368 22 8214 1,698 8048 1,698 8038 4,500 139 65 S 8214 1,698 8048 1,698 8038 4,500 8022 4,500 8064 1,698 214 2 NE 8038 4,500 8022 4,500 287 2 E 8067 1,698 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Table J-3. Selected Model Outputs for the Evacuation of the Entire EPZ (Region R03)Network-Wide Average 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 Travel Time (Min/Veh-Mi)

Network-Wide Average 60.0 55.2 60.0 55.8 57.1 60.0 55.1 Speed (mph)Total Vehicles Extin Network 7,727 7,773 7,274 7,318 5,414 7,800 7,846 Exiting Network Network-Wide Average 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 Travel Time (Min/Veh-Mi)

Network-Wide Average 49.2 60.0 55.7 50.0 57.1 59.2 59.3 Speed (mph)Total Vehicles Extin Network 7,838 7,282 7,326 7,343 5,421 8,421 7,727 Exiting Network Table J-4. Average Speed (mph) and Travel Time (min) for Major Evacuation Routes (Region R03, Scenario 1)US-l5 SB ZZ.4 I 5b.8 1 23.1 1 58.8 1 ZZ.9 I b8./ I 23.U I bU.4 I ZZ.3 US-75 NB 22.5 58.7 22.9 59.2 22.8 60.0 22.4 60.4 122.3 12th Rd WB 10.0 46.4 12.9 41.5 14.4 41.5 14.4 48.0 12.5 11th Rd/l2th Rd EB 13.6 53.1 15.3 39.9 20.4 39.7 20.5 53.1 15.3 16th Rd EB 10.6 60.0 10.6 64.2 9.9 58.3 10.9 65.0 9.8 17th Rd WB 4.4 46.0 5.7 46.0 5.7 46.0 5.7 46.0 5.7 Wolf Creek Generating Station KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I Table J-5. Simulation Model Outputs at Network Exit Links for Region R03, Scenario 1 Cumulative Vehicles Discharged by the Indicated TimeýCumul~ative CPercent of Vehicles Dischiarged During the Indicated Time Interval 451 1,041 1,135 1,150 6 17%16%15%15%42 48 106 116 117 2% 2% 2% 2%87 830 1,929 2,283 2,301 31% 29% 30% 30%124 41 143 152 153 2% 2% 2% 2%145 123 300 328 331 5% 5% 4% 4%173 824 1,976 2,339 2,359 31% 30% 31% 31%192 90 174 183 184 3% 3% 2% 2%237 264 978 1,104 1,132 10% 15% 14% 15%i-s KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 1)-Trip Generation -ETE a, a'15 4-0 I-.4-0 4-C a'U a'a.100%80%60%40%20%'000ý0%0 30 60 90 120 150 Elapsed Time (min)180 210 240 270 Figure J-1. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 1)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)-Trip Generation -ETE 100%4-0 0 80%60%40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 Elapsed Time (min)180 210 240 270 Figure J-2. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 3),-Trip Generation mETE.U:E 0 U 100%80%60%40%20%0%-.a/O'OOOr 0 30 60 90 120 150 Elapsed Time (min)180 210 240 270 Figure J-3. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 3)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)-Trip Generation ,ETE'A a, U a,'U 4-0 I-0 4-C a, U a, a-100%80%60%40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 Elapsed Time (min)180 210 240 270 Figure J-4. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)J~7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 5),,Trip Generation

-ETE 100%in 80%60%4-0 40%U 20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-5. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 5)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 6)-Trip Generation -ETE VI 4, 0 100%80%60%40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Elapsed Time (min)210 240 270 300 Figure J-6. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 6)Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)-Trip Generation -ETE 100%.80%"a-" 60%4.6 0 I-40%20%a.0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-7. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Snow (Scenario 8)-Trip Generation m ETE 0 100%80%60%40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Elapsed Time (min)210 240 270 300 330 Figure J-8. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Snow (Scenario 8)Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 9)-Trip Generation 1ETE 100%:E 04-0 I-.4-80%60%40%20%0%/7//1/0 30 60 90 120 150 Elapsed Time (min)180 210 240 270 Figure J-9. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 9)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 10)-Trip Generation -ETE 0 4.-0 100%80%40%20%0%1;ýr 60% /7 0 30 60 90 120 150 Elapsed Time (min)180 210 240 270 Figure J-10. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 10)Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Snow (Scenario 11)-Trip Generation lETE U'a, a,'U 4..C I-'4-0 4-C a'U I-a, 100%80%60%40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-11. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Snow (Scenario 11)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 12)-Trip Generation -ETE 4-0a I-4--100%80%60%40%20%77 0%I 0 30 60 90 120 150 Elapsed Time (min)180 210 240 270 Figure J-12. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 12)Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-ll KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good, Special Event (Scenario 13)-Trip Generation -ETE 100%80%*j 60%0 I-0B 40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-13. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Wolf Creek Refueling Outage (Scenario 13)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good, Roadway Impact (Scenario 14)-Trip Generation -ETE 100%:E 4-0 0 4.6 U 80%60%40%20%0%'000ý0 30 60 90 120 150 Elapsed Time (min)180 210 240 270 Figure J-14. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Roadway Impact (Scenario 14)Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 APPENDIX K Evacuation Roadway Network K. EVACUATION ROADWAY NETWORK As discussed in Section 1.3, a link-node analysis network was constructed to model the roadway network within the study area. Figure K-1 provides an overview of the link-node analysis network. The figure has been divided up into 21 more detailed figures (Figure K-2 through Figure K-22) which show each of the links and nodes in the network.The analysis network was calibrated using the observations made during the field survey conducted in April 2012. Table K-1 lists the characteristics of each roadway section modeled in the ETE analysis.

Each link is identified by its road name and the upstream and downstream node numbers. The geographic location of each link can be observed by referencing the grid map number provided in Table K-1. The roadway type identified in Table K-1 is generally based on the following criteria: " Freeway: limited access highway, 2 or more lanes in each direction, high free flow speeds" Freeway ramp: ramp on to or off of a limited access highway* Minor arterial:

2 or more lanes in each direction* Collector:

single lane in each direction* Local roadways:

single lane in each direction, local roads with low free flow speeds The term, "No. of Lanes" in Table K-1 identifies the number of lanes that extend throughout the length of the link. Many links have additional lanes on the immediate approach to an intersection (turn pockets);

these have been recorded and entered into the input stream for the DYNEV II System.As discussed in Section 1.3, lane width and shoulder width were not physically measured during the road survey. Rather, estimates of these measures were based on visual observations and recorded images.Table K-2 identifies each node in the network that is controlled and the type of control (stop sign, yield sign, pre-timed signal, actuated signal, traffic control point) at that node.Uncontrolled nodes are not included in Table K-2. The location of each node can be observed by referencing the grid map number provided.Wolf Creek Generating Station K-1 KLD Engineering.

P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Appendix K Overview Barcl__ ie OF I Richmon 2- 5,,1 Neosho Rapids IE 3A 0/p R.Onrn N i 1 0 'iI/lll (ocn l: = .-'.... -7. ._ n-1(nr Nod 1 ~ ~ W 2 -- -J,<. 2i. 9.. ,.... ---Link t__ __... ..... 1 3 __._ t -_ Z e~o li SuMont L Igndex Grid Lone Elm.2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings iil t ' ..._Shadow Region ____,____________,____......_____________

Mile Figure K-i. Wolf Creek Generating Station Link-Node Analysis Network Wolf Creek Generating Station K-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 tL'beto L~b~Iff Rd Krngra,' Rd cO285Th SI-R-cC OCmek Rd E 293Rd SI ACksSCRdI S Grid 1 4 HakeRI Rd SEHam,9 0 5 To, S S SI p El E 309Th St 38 John Rd a.S 34 Figure K-2. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 1 K-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-3. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 2 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-4. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 3 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-5. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 4 K-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-6 KLD Engineering, PeC.Rev. 1 Ejh~s T5, 3 3333 dt4...E 333Rd t*A 41 I '0 28Th Rd Nl?I / ~28Th Rd WO _61)N o S j r, E S 287, 7W E iýd T- " 5 2512 1868,153 -5 h R I 2 2 5 R d 251L~t240 23912 1- ~ ~ ~ 0 25M t ,ftý 25 th Ndy~t-t7 t S2t39 -,, thd 222 5 7 150 d N _______R 24Th k' 4 ..... Th Rd I NE+ 'o, +! ,,.: d- i-238-- -+ l -Su .0 C1:o. ++-23Rd j Rd 238, 1072 ~8 ~ l2.2NRd.2

---

-- w22GOO1 2Nd NEdj 22d dSuz Nc: d-Legend WCGS Evacuation Time Estimate SWCGS Shadow Region Link-Node Analysis Network Figures* Node 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings I 1<Link Water Grid 5 I? Subzone = Index Grid L 4 .Figure K-6. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 5 Wolf Creek Generating Station K-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Figure K-7. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 6 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 I Figure K-8. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 7 K-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-9. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 8 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-10. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 9 K-il KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-11. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 10 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-12. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 11 K-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-13. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 12 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-14. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 13 K-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 13 ,Subzone: 1O3Th L Subzone: W-1 I Ap Sulreone:

12 227"4 145 t0 -t CO 6' t 63A'GK s~ 8 1~ , .235 ll~ho S.~ £~ oC~ 1iO.~Subzone:

I, I Th Rds 234 ~ 14 jVr Rd 2 7 8 , 125v~Tjo S u I i Th Rd'Subzo Ine:E-Subzo 'L..CTR 260 IlTh RdSý71I A 169 11Th RdS, 71-j , 41-'e44 ] 5ie-5Mie Subzonc: 1 SE-I !s\S o 463 9Th Rd i f 6.CO CO Th P1t TO Rl1 9 -S Subzone: S-2 Akgj Sub;8h Rd St 7Tb Rd one: I se 6Th Rd 0 CO A CC CO j~se 01h Rd 2431 7 Th Rd Se 244 CO 61 0.-C CO Th Rd 6 CO 6Tth Ln 0Th. Rd. ~CCC 6 CO CO 11 6Th Rd!.... -Subzone:.

..SE-3....... --.....-- i a. 1 l Legend map I... WCGS Evacuation Time Estimate f CGS N Shadow Rgion -- Link-Node Analysis Network Figures SNode 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings i -1ý: Link Water ], IGrid 14 4? Subzone L Index Grid Figure K-15. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 14 Wolf Creek Gpnpr~tina

~t~tinn N-ID KID Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate N -10 KLD Engineering, P.C1 Rev. 1 Figure K-16. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 15 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 T Se l20Th Rd S. 11007h Rd -S Grid 161/ I/ o ~T S 7000 RdRd.... WCGS Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures KU~Grid Ij -+ I -K, de Analysis Network -Grid 16 K-18 KLD Ene Sc 600t-h 9d WCGS Shadow Region 0 Node " 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings-1p, Unk I Water 4? Subzone C Index Grid 16 Figure K-17. Link-No Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate gineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-18. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 17 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-19. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 18 Wolf Creek Generating Station K-20 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Figure K-20. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 19 K-21 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-21 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I Figure K-21. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 20 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-22 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-22. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 21 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-23 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Table K-1. Evacuation Roadway Network Characteristics I I I AN(bU5 RD LOLLECTI OR 1Ubb 1 12 0 1700 b5 12 2 1 249 ANGUS RD COLLECTOR 10736 1 12 0 1700 65 12 3 2 41 SR 31 COLLECTOR 17159 1 10 2 1700 65 5 4 2 53 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 11837 1 10 4 1700 65 5 5 3 4 US 75 COLLECTOR 26277 1 10 8 1700 75 19 6 3 48 US 75 COLLECTOR 4952 1 10 8 1700 75 19 7 4 3 US 75 COLLECTOR 26277 1 10 8 1700 75 19 8 4 5 US 75 COLLECTOR 5287 1 10 8 1700 75 19 9 5 4 US 75 COLLECTOR 5287 1 10 8 1700 75 19 10 5 243 US 75 COLLECTOR 13658 1 10 6 1700 65 14 11 5 279 SR 58 COLLECTOR 5278 1 12 4 1700 40 19 12 6 142 US 75 COLLECTOR 3590 1 12 4 1575 35 14 13 6 153 US 75 COLLECTOR 1698 2 12 4 1900 35 14 14 6 163 11TH LN COLLECTOR 1415 1 10 4 1575 35 14 15 7 8 US 75 COLLECTOR 6543 1 10 8 1700 70 14 16 7 162 US 75 COLLECTOR 1986 1 10 8 1700 45 14 17 8 7 US 75 COLLECTOR 6528 1 10 8 1700 70 14 18 8 231 US 75 COLLECTOR 3900 1 12 4 1700 40 9 19 9 10 US 75 COLLECTOR 6865 1 12 4 1700 70 9 20 9 86 US 75 COLLECTOR 5191 1 12 4 1700 70 9 21 10 9 US75 COLLECTOR 6844 1 12 4 1700 70 9 22 10 228 US 75 COLLECTOR 4899 1 12 4 1700 75 9 23 11 20 22ND RD COLLECTOR 26715 1 12 4 1700 40 9 24 11 228 US 75 COLLECTOR 10337 1 12 4 1700 75 9 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-24 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 25 11 27 US 75 COLLECTOR 16107 1 24 1700 75 4 26 11 275 22ND RD COLLECTOR 20744 1 12 4 1700 40 8 27 12 183 22ND RD COLLECTOR 21164 1 12 4 1700 40 7 28 12 252 SR 131 COLLECTOR 10634 1 10 0 1700 65 3 29 13 15 US 75 COLLECTOR 7272 1 12 4 1700 45 4 30 13 49 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 36931 1 10 4 1700 65 3 31 13 52 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 26299 1 12 4 1700 40 4 32 13 257 US 75 COLLECTOR 5085 1 12 4 1700 75 4 33 15 13 US 75 COLLECTOR 7272 1 12 4 1700 45 4 34 15 16 US 75 COLLECTOR 1264 2 12 4 1900 45 4 35 16 15 US 75 COLLECTOR 1264 2 12 4 1900 45 4 36 16 17 US 76 COLLECTOR 814 2 12 4 1900 45 4 1-35 ON RAMP 37 16 27 FROM US 75 FREEWAY RAMP 1579 1 12 4 1700 45 4 38 17 16 US 76 COLLECTOR 814 2 12 4 1900 45 4 39 17 18 US 75 COLLECTOR 1280 2 12 4 1900 45 4 1-35 ON RAMP 40 17 26 FROM US 75 FREEWAY RAMP 1193 1 12 4 1700 45 4 41 18 17 US 75 COLLECTOR 1280 2 12 4 1900 45 4 42 18 21 US 75 COLLECTOR 12055 1 12 4 1700 45 4 43 19 60 SR 31 COLLECTOR 7372 1 10 4 1700 50 11 44 19 193 SR 31 COLLECTOR 12781 1 12 4 1700 40 6 45 20 11 22ND RD COLLECTOR 26715 1 12 4 1700 40 9 46 20 107 22ND RD COLLECTOR 10314 1 10 1 1700 65 10 47 21 18 US 75 COLLECTOR 12055 1 12 4 1700 45 4 Wolf Creek Generating Station K-25 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 I-NIK LINK 21 8021 IUS 75 COLLECTOR 1831 1 12 4 1700 45 4 48 22 99 1-35 FREEWAY 4363 2 12 8 2250 75 2 EXIT LINK 22 8022 1-35 FREEWAY 2563 2 12 8 2250 75 2 49 23 24 1-35 FREEWAY 1678 2 12 8 2250 75 3 1-35 OFF RAMP TO 50 23 45 SR 131 FREEWAY RAMP 987 1 12 4 1700 45 3 51 23 105 1-35 FREEWAY 6693 2 12 8 2250 75 3 52 24 23 1-35 FREEWAY 1678 2 12 8 2250 75 3 1-35 OFF RAMP TO 53 24 46 SR 131 FREEWAY RAMP 929 1 12 4 1700 45 3 54 24 47 1-35 FREEWAY 15100 2 12 8 2250 75 3 55 25 26 1-35 FREEWAY 4658 2 12 4 2250 70 4 56 25 47 1-35 FREEWAY 15575 2 12 8 2250 75 3 1-35 OFF RAMP TO 57 26 16 US 75 FREEWAY RAMP 1005 1 12 4 1700 45 4 58 26 25 1-35 FREEWAY 4668 2 12 4 2250 70 4 59 26 27 1-35 FREEWAY 2434 2 12 4 2250 70 4 1-35 OFF RAMP TO 60 27 17 US 75 FREEWAY RAMP 1346 1 12 4 1700 45 4 61 27 26 1-35 FREEWAY 2434 2 12 4 2250 70 4 62 27 28 1-35 FREEWAY 17270 2 12 10 2250 75 4 63 28 27 1-35 FREEWAY 17270 2 12 10 2250 75 4 64 28 29 1-35 FREEWAY 7328 2 12 10 2250 75 4 65 29 28 1-35 FREEWAY 7334 2 12 10 2250 75 4 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-26 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 66 29 30 1-35 FREEWAY 2196 2 12 8 2250 75 4 1-35 OFF RAMP TO 67 29 44 REAPER RD FREEWAY RAMP 1196 1 12 4 1700 45 4 68 30 29 1-35 FREEWAY 2196 2 12 8 2250 75 4 69 30 31 1-35 FREEWAY 8940 2 12 8 2250 75 5 1-35 OFF RAMP TO 70 30 43 REAPER RD FREEWAY RAMP 944 1 12 4 1700 45 4 71 31 30 1-35 FREEWAY 8946 2 12 8 2250 75 5 72 31 32 1-35 FREEWAY 1816 2 12 8 2250 75 5 1-35 OFF RAMP TO 73 31 41 SR 31 FREEWAY RAMP 927 1 12 4 1700 45 5 74 32 31 1-35 FREEWAY 1816 2 12 8 2250 75 5 75 32 33 1-35 FREEWAY 20468 2 12 8 2250 75 5 1-35 OFF RAMP TO 76 32 42 SR 31 FREEWAY RAMP 1076 1 12 4 1700 45 5 77 33 32 1-35 FREEWAY 20470 2 12 8 2250 75 5 78 33 34 1-35 FREEWAY 3824 2 12 10 2250 75 1 79 34 33 1-35 FREEWAY 3821 2 12 10 2250 75 1 80 34 35 1-35 FREEWAY 9876 2 12 10 2250 75 1 81 35 34 1-35 FREEWAY 9876 2 12 10 2250 75 1 82 35 36 1-35 FREEWAY 3892 2 12 10 2250 75 1 83 36 35 1-35 FREEWAY 3895 2 12 10 2250 75 1 84 36 37 1-35 FREEWAY 1312 2 12 10 2250 75 1 1-35 OFF RAMP TO 85 36 40 N DANE AVE FREEWAY RAMP 727 1 12 4 1700 45 1 86 37 36 1-35 FREEWAY 1312 2 12 10 2250 75 1 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-27 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Strea Stra Legt No. ofWdh Soudr Rt Speed Gri 87 37 38 1-35 FREEWAY 3208 2 12 10 2250 75 1 1-35 OFF RAMP TO 88 37 39 N DANE AVE FREEWAY RAMP 774 1 12 4 1700 45 1 89 38 37 1-35 FREEWAY 3208 2 12 10 2250 75 1 EXIT LINK 38 8038 1-35 FREEWAY 1417 2 12 8 2250 75 1 I-35 UN KAMP FROM N DANE AVE 684 90 39 36 FREEWAY RAMP 1 12 4 1700 45 1 1-35 ON RAMP FROM N DANE 91 40 37 AVE FREEWAY RAMP 813 1 12 4 1700 45 1 92 40 39 N DANE AVE COLLECTOR 721 1 10 0 1700 40 1 1-35 ON RAMP 93 41 32 FROM SR 31 FREEWAY RAMP 1057 1 12 4 1700 45 5 94 41 42 SR 31 COLLECTOR 712 1 12 4 1700 40 5 1-35 ON RAMP 95 42 31 FROM SR 31 FREEWAY RAMP 845 1 12 4 1700 45 5 1-35 ON RAMP 96 43 29 FROM REAPER RD FREEWAY RAMP 1344 1 12 4 1700 45 4 1-35 ON RAMP 97 44 30 FROM REAPER RD FREEWAY RAMP 1162 1 12 4 1700 45 4 98 44 43 REAPER RD COLLECTOR 770 1 12 4 1700 40 4 1-35 ON RAMP 99 45 24 FROM SR 131 FREEWAY RAMP 1001 1 12 4 1700 45 3 100 45 46 SR 131 COLLECTOR 971 1 12 4 1700 40 3 1-35 ON RAMP 101 46 23 FROM SR 131 FREEWAY RAMP 963 1 12 4 1700 45 3 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-28 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 102 47 24 1-35 FREEWAY 15095 2 12 8 2250 75 3 103 47 25 1-35 FREEWAY 15570 2 12 8 2250 75 3 104 48 3 US 75 COLLECTOR 4952 1 10 8 1700 75 19 EXIT LINK 48 8048 US 75 COLLECTOR 2595 1 10 8 1700 75 19 105 49 50 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 5232 1 12 4 1700 40 3 106 49 148 SR 131 COLLECTOR 2662 1 10 0 1700 40 3 107 50 51 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 21316 1 12 4 1700 40 2 LOCAL 108 51 184 OLD HWY 50 ROADWAY 10547 1 12 4 1700 40 2 109 52 2 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 10654 1 12 4 1700 40 5 110 52 13 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 26299 1 12 4 1700 40 4 111 52 44 REAPER RD COLLECTOR 15442 1 10 1 1700 65 4 112 53 186 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 1807 1 10 4 1700 65 5 113 54 188 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 3526 1 12 4 1700 50 6 114 55 189 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 3719 1 10 4 1700 45 1 115 56 190 N DANE AVE COLLECTOR 2271 1 10 0 1700 40 1 116 57 150 1ST ST COLLECTOR 3191 1 12 4 1575 35 5 117 57 220 SR 31 COLLECTOR 1823 1 12 4 1700 40 5 118 58 59 COLORADO RD COLLECTOR 33191 1 12 4 1700 40 6 119 59 191 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 966 1 12 4 1700 40 1 120 60 19 SR 31 COLLECTOR 7372 1 10 4 1700 50 11 LOCAL 121 60 198 SR 31 ROADWAY 4377 1 10 4 900 20 11 122 61 206 SR 31 COLLECTOR 859 1 10 4 1575 35 11 123 62 199 SR 31 COLLECTOR 2405 1 12 0 1700 65 11 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-29 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 12 3 64 SR 31 COLLECTOR 5669 1 201700 65 11 LINK 64 8064 SR 31 COLLECTOR 3931 1 12 0 1700 65 11 125 65 119 COLORADO RD COLLECTOR 16764 1 12 4 1700 40 11 126 65 174 1300 RD COLLECTOR 684 1 12 4 1700 60 16 127 66 175 GEORGIA RD COLLECTOR 763 1 12 4 1700 40 16 EXIT LINK 67 8067 16TH RD COLLECTOR 2134 1 10 3 1700 60 11 128 68 171 1200 RD COLLECTOR 422 1 12 4 1700 40 16 129 68 172 COLORADO RD COLLECTOR 596 1 12 4 1700 40 16 130 69 111 12TH RD COLLECTOR 21150 1 10 0 1700 50 15 131 69 262 SHETLAND RD COLLECTOR 10590 1 12 4 1700 65 15 132 70 272 12TH RD COLLECTOR 4875 1 10 0 1700 50 14 133 71 169 QUAIL RD COLLECTOR 997 1 12 4 1700 45 14 134 71 260 11TH RD COLLECTOR 9821 1 12 4 1700 55 14 135 72 167 NATIVE RD COLLECTOR 2432 1 12 4 1700 50 14 136 72 168 11TH RD COLLECTOR 996 1 12 4 1700 55 14 137 73 163 11TH LN COLLECTOR 2947 1 10 4 1750 60 14 138 73 167 NATIVE RD COLLECTOR 1207 1 12 4 1700 45 14 139 74 76 F ST COLLECTOR 5240 1 10 0 1575 35 20 140 74 165 JUDKINS ST COLLECTOR 1593 1 10 0 1575 35 20 141 76 131 SR 58 COLLECTOR 5241 1 12 4 1700 40 20 142 76 164 SR 58 COLLECTOR 1532 1 12 4 1575 35 20 143 77 78 SR 58 COLLECTOR 9719 1 12 4 1700 70 21 144 78 79 SR 58 COLLECTOR 6409 1 12 4 1700 70 21 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-30 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 145 79 166 SR 58 COLLECTOR 5134 1 12 4 1700 70 21 146 80 152 16TH ST COLLECTOR 1224 1 10 0 1700 45 14 147 80 224 W NEOSHO ST COLLECTOR 2623 1 12 4 1700 40 14 148 80 234 16TH ST COLLECTOR 3628 1 12 4 1700 45 14 149 81 90 12TH RD COLLECTOR 15803 1 10 2 1700 55 13 LOCAL 150 81 223 KENNEBEC ST ROADWAY 2608 1 12 4 1350 30 14 151 82 114 12TH RD COLLECTOR 16112 1 12 2 1700 65 13 152 83 218 SR 58 COLLECTOR 18423 1 10 0 1700 60 18 153 84 216 COUNTOUR RD COLLECTOR 4806 1 10 0 1700 65 17 154 86 9 US 75 COLLECTOR 5191 1 12 4 1700 70 9 155 86 87 17TH RD COLLECTOR 7533 1 10 2 1700 40 9 156 86 147 US 75 COLLECTOR 2712 1 12 2 1700 70 9 157 87 269 KAFIR RD COLLECTOR 344 1 10 0 1700 40 8 158 88 180 19TH RD COLLECTOR 888 1 10 0 1700 40 8 159 89 181 SR 131 COLLECTOR 756 1 10 0 1700 40 8 160 90 82 12TH RD COLLECTOR 15628 1 12 4 1700 40 13 161 90 126 IRIS RD COLLECTOR 10604 1 10 0 1700 60 13 162 91 147 US 75 COLLECTOR 2505 2 12 2 1900 70 9 163 91 231 US75 COLLECTOR 6065 1 12 4 1700 40 9 164 92 91 LAKE RD NW COLLECTOR 2006 1 12 4 1700 40 9 165 93 94 EMBANKMENT RD COLLECTOR 5668 1 10 2 1700 60 9 166 93 207 EMBANKMENT RD COLLECTOR 3878 1 12 2 1700 60 9 167 93 231 15TH RD COLLECTOR 3967 1 12 4 1700 40 9 168 94 95 EMBANKMENT RD COLLECTOR 15795 1 10 1 1700 60 13 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-31 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 169 95 90 IRIS RD COLLECTOR 2495 1 10 1 1700 55 13 170 96 136 RD Y5 COLLECTOR 15471 1 12 4 1700 65 7 171 97 115 SR 130 COLLECTOR 9456 1 12 0 1700 60 7 172 98 213 SR 130 COLLECTOR 2196 1 12 0 1700 60 2 173 99 22 1-35 FREEWAY 4227 2 12 8 2250 75 2 174 99 100 1-35 FREEWAY 2667 2 12 4 2250 70 2 1-35 OFF RAMP TO 175 99 101 SR 130 FREEWAY RAMP 1341 1 12 4 1700 45 2 176 100 99 1-35 FREEWAY 2622 2 12 4 2250 70 2 1-35 OFF RAMP TO 177 100 102 SR 130 FREEWAY RAMP 1368 1 12 4 1700 45 2 178 100 104 1-35 FREEWAY 15231 2 12 8 2250 75 2 1-35 ON RAMP 179 101 100 FROM SR 130 FREEWAY RAMP 1404 1 12 4 1700 45 2 180 101 102 SR 130 COLLECTOR 547 1 12 0 1700 40 2 1-35 ON RAMP 181 102 99 FROM SR 130 FREEWAY RAMP 1337 1 12 4 1700 45 2 182 103 134 SR 130 COLLECTOR 1642 1 12 0 1700 45 2 183 104 100 1-35 FREEWAY 15193 2 12 8 2250 75 2 184 104 105 1-35 FREEWAY 14138 2 12 8 2250 75 2 185 105 23 1-35 FREEWAY 6037 2 12 8 2250 75 3 186 105 104 1-35 FREEWAY 13701 2 12 8 2250 75 2 187 106 155 16TH RD COLLECTOR 2112 1 12 3 1700 65 10 188 106 229 REAPER RD COLLECTOR 21200 1 12 4 1700 45 9 189 107 57 SR 31 COLLECTOR 15792 1 10 1 1700 45 5 190 107 122 22ND RD COLLECTOR 16188 1 10 1 1700 65 10 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-32 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 191 108 178 NE HARPER RD COLLECTOR 13368 1 10 0 1700 60 11 192 109 67 16TH RD COLLECTOR 5341 1 10 3 1700 60 11 193 110 111 WAYSIDE RD COLLECTOR 22204 1 12 4 1700 40 10 194 110 120 16TH RD COLLECTOR 2661 1 12 3 1700 65 10 195 111 110 WAYSIDE RD COLLECTOR 22204 1 12 4 1700 40 10 196 111 241 WAYSIDE RD COLLECTOR 10502 1 10 0 1700 65 15 197 111 276 1200 RD COLLECTOR 10693 1 10 0 1700 65 15 198 112 77 SR 58 COLLECTOR 10811 1 12 4 1700 70 20 199 113 82 FAUNA RD COLLECTOR 21639 1 12 4 1700 40 13 200 113 273 16TH RD COLLECTOR 2971 1 12 4 1700 40 8 201 114 1 12TH RD COLLECTOR 10527 1 12 2 1700 65 12 202 115 211 SR 130 COLLECTOR 824 1 12 0 1700 60 7 203 116 117 OXEN LN COLLECTOR 6009 1 10 3 1700 60 9 204 117 200 OXEN LN COLLECTOR 1314 1 10 3 1700 40 9 205 117 271 16TH RD COLLECTOR 7902 1 12 3 1700 65 9 206 118 233 17TH RD COLLECTOR 1901 1 10 3 1700 50 9 207 119 65 COLORADO RD COLLECTOR 16764 1 12 4 1700 40 11 208 119 109 16TH RD COLLECTOR 18976 1 10 3 1700 60 11 209 120 158 16TH RD COLLECTOR 16013 1 12 3 1700 65 10 210 120 203 WAYSIDE RD COLLECTOR 20314 1 12 4 1700 40 10 211 121 122 WAYSIDE RD COLLECTOR 10700 1 12 4 1700 40 10 212 121 205 20TH RD COLLECTOR 15843 1 12 4 1700 40 10 213 122 123 WAYSIDE RD COLLECTOR 15981 1 12 4 1700 40 5 214 122 254 22ND RD COLLECTOR 15858 1 10 2 1700 65 10 215 123 124 WAYSIDE RD COLLECTOR 7756 1 12 4 1700 40 5 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-33 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 216 123 255 SR-31 COLLECTOR 15951 1 12 4 1700 65 5 217 124 187 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 7484 1 12 4 1700 50 5 218 125 142 US 75 COLLECTOR 5185 1 12 4 1700 45 14 219 125 243 US 75 COLLECTOR 13187 1 10 6 1700 65 14 220 125 278 10TH RD COLLECTOR 5245 1 12 4 1700 40 14 221 126 267 IRIS RD COLLECTOR 10554 1 10 0 1700 45 13 222 126 274 10TH RD COLLECTOR 15884 1 12 4 1700 40 13 223 127 137 10TH RD COLLECTOR 10482 1 12 4 1700 40 12 224 128 74 SHETLAND RD COLLECTOR 15915 1 10 1 1700 65 15 225 128 265 8TH RD COLLECTOR 5231 1 12 4 1700 40 15 226 129 112 WAYSIDE RD COLLECTOR 21094 1 10 0 1700 65 15 227 129 130 8TH RD COLLECTOR 26546 1 12 4 1700 40 16 228 130 79 COLORADO RD COLLECTOR 20967 1 12 4 1700 40 16 229 131 76 SR 58 COLLECTOR 5241 1 12 4 1700 40 20 230 131 112 SR 58 COLLECTOR 15583 1 10 2 1700 70 20 231 132 131 TREFOIL RD COLLECTOR 15581 1 12 4 1700 40 20 232 133 176 1350 RD COLLECTOR 780 1 12 4 1700 40 16 233 134 184 SR 130 COLLECTOR 10750 1 12 0 1700 60 2 LOCAL 234 135 209 W MAPLE AVE ROADWAY 336 1 12 0 900 20 7 LOCAL 235 136 208 MECHANIC ST ROADWAY 584 1 12 4 900 20 7 236 137 138 CR 102 COLLECTOR 21113 1 12 0 1700 65 12 237 138 214 SR 58 COLLECTOR 2536 1 10 0 1700 60 17 238 139 219 FRESSENDEN ST COLLECTOR 546 1 10 0 1575 35 18 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-34 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 LULAL ROADWAY 900 239 140 141 1 MAIN ST 2086 1 12 10 20 18 LOCAL 240 141 139 SR 58 ROADWAY 1059 1 10 0 1350 30 18 241 142 6 US 75 COLLECTOR 3590 2 12 4 1750 35 14 242 142 125 US 75 COLLECTOR 5185 1 12 4 1700 45 14 243 143 144 US 75 COLLECTOR 1651 2 12 4 1750 40 14 244 143 153 US 75 COLLECTOR 1034 2 12 4 1900 35 14 245 144 143 US 75 COLLECTOR 1651 2 12 4 1900 40 14 246 144 162 US 75 COLLECTOR 1059 2 10 8 1900 45 14 LOCAL 247 145 144 CROSS ST ROADWAY 1926 1 12 4 1750 30 14 248 146 144 CROSS ST COLLECTOR 2568 1 12 4 1750 30 14 249 147 86 US 75 COLLECTOR 2712 1 12 2 1700 70 9 250 147 91 US 75 COLLECTOR 2503 2 12 2 1900 70 9 LOCAL 251 148 149 SR 131 ROADWAY 2958 1 10 0 900 20 3 252 149 45 SR 131 COLLECTOR 2015 1 12 10 1700 45 3 253 150 123 25TH RD COLLECTOR 12522 1 12 4 1700 65 5 254 151 266 LYNX RD COLLECTOR 5161 1 10 0 1700 40 14 255 152 81 16TH ST COLLECTOR 429 1 10 0 1700 40 14 256 153 6 US 75 COLLECTOR 1698 2 12 4 1750 35 14 257 153 143 US 75 COLLECTOR 1034 2 12 4 1900 35 14 LOCAL 258 153 223 KENNEBEC ST ROADWAY 2526 1 12 4 1350 30 14 259 154 261 SR 58 COLLECTOR 16901 1 12 4 1700 65 19 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-35 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 260 155 156 16TH RD COLLECTOR 8334 1 12 3 1700 65 10 261 156 107 TREFOIL RD COLLECTOR 31891 1 10 0 1700 65 10 262 156 110 16TH RD COLLECTOR 13153 1 12 3 1700 65 10 263 157 68 1200 RD COLLECTOR 7535 1 10 0 1700 65 16 LOCAL 264 157 158 NW BARTON RD ROADWAY 22366 1 12 4 1350 30 11 265 158 119 16TH RD COLLECTOR 7952 1 12 3 1700 65 11 LOCAL 266 158 205 NW ARKANSAS RD ROADWAY 21109 1 12 4 1350 30 11 LOCAL 267 159 160 SW BARTON RD ROADWAY 1739 1 12 4 900 20 16 LOCAL 268 160 157 SW BARTON RD ROADWAY 5142 1 12 4 1350 30 16 LOCAL 269 161 159 LONERGAN AVE ROADWAY 2257 1 8 0 1350 30 16 270 162 7 US 75 COLLECTOR 1985 1 10 8 1700 45 14 271 162 144 US 75 COLLECTOR 1059 2 10 8 1750 45 14 272 163 6 11TH LN COLLECTOR 1415 1 10 4 1750 35 14 273 163 73 11TH LN COLLECTOR 2947 1 10 4 1700 60 14 274 164 76 SR 58 COLLECTOR 1532 1 12 4 1575 35 20 275 164 154 SR 58 COLLECTOR 2868 1 12 4 1575 35 20 276 165 164 MAIN ST COLLECTOR 5218 1 10 0 1575 35 20 EXIT LINK 166 8166 SR 58 COLLECTOR 5195 1 12 4 1700 70 21 277 167 72 NATIVE RD COLLECTOR 2432 1 12 4 1700 50 14 278 167 73 NATIVE RD COLLECTOR 1212 1 12 4 1700 45 14 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-36 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 279 1 72 11TH RD COLLECTOR 970 1 12 4 1700 55 14 280 168 260 11TH RD COLLECTOR 4669 1 12 4 1700 55 14 281 169 170 QUAIL RD COLLECTOR 3727 1 12 4 1700 65 14 282 170 70 QUAIL RD COLLECTOR 1339 1 12 4 1700 45 14 283 171 130 COLORADO RD COLLECTOR 20781 1 12 4 1700 40 16 284 172 173 COLORADO RD COLLECTOR 4645 1 12 4 1700 40 16 285 173 65 COLORADO RD COLLECTOR 486 1 12 4 1700 40 16 LOCAL 286 173 174 COLORADO RD ROADWAY 888 1 12 4 1700 40 16 287 174 66 1300 RD COLLECTOR 14811 1 12 4 1700 60 16 288 175 133 GEORGIA RD COLLECTOR 1787 1 12 4 1700 40 16 289 176 177 1350 RD COLLECTOR 1774 1 12 4 1700 40 16 290 177 108 1350 RD COLLECTOR 753 1 12 4 1700 40 16 291 178 109 NE HARPER RD COLLECTOR 641 1 10 0 1700 60 11 292 179 88 KAFIR RD COLLECTOR 9527 1 10 0 1700 60 8 293 180 236 19TH RD COLLECTOR 7364 1 10 0 1700 65 8 294 181 12 SR 131 COLLECTOR 15164 1 10 0 1700 50 8 295 182 115 22ND RD COLLECTOR 3962 1 12 4 1700 40 7 296 183 182 22ND RD COLLECTOR 1330 1 12 4 1700 40 7 297 184 101 SR 130 COLLECTOR 875 1 12 0 1700 60 2 298 186 124 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 2934 1 10 4 1700 65 5 299 187 54 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 7268 1 12 4 1700 50 5 300 188 55 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 12521 1 12 4 1700 50 6 301 189 56 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 660 1 10 4 1700 40 1 302 190 40 N DANE AVE COLLECTOR 1667 1 10 0 1700 40 1 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-37 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 303 191 192 1 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 1 2297 1 12 4 1700 40 1 304 9 192 56 OLD HWY 50 COLLECTOR 172297 1 12 4 1700 40 1 304 192 564 OLD HW1 COLLECTOR 21729 1 12 4 1700 40 1 305 193 194 SR31 COLLECTOR 21012 1 12 4 1700 40 6 306 194 158 SR31 COLLECTOR 1041 1 12 4 1700 40 6 307 194 195 SR 31 COLLECTOR 8415 1 12 4 1700 45 6 308 195 197 SR 31 COLLECTOR 445 1 12 4 1700 65 6 3109 196 158 SR 31 COLLECTOR 868 1 12 4 1700 45 6 LOCAL 311 198 61 SR 31 ROADWAY 1788 1 10 14 900 20 11 312 199 63 SR 31 COLLECTOR 1165 1 12 0 1700 65 11 313 200 201 OXEN LN COLLECTOR 1055 1 10 3 1700 40 9 314 201 202 OXEN IN COLLECTOR 1994 1 10 3 1700 40 9 315 202 118 OXEN IN COLLECTOR 1304 1 10 3 1700 40 9 316 203 204 WAYSIDE RD COLLECTOR 774 1 12 4 1700 40 10 317 204 121 20TH RD COLLECTOR 163 1 12 4 1700 40 10 318 205 206 20TH RD COLLECTOR 15917 1 12 4 1700 40 11 LOCAL 319 205 254 NW ARKANSAS RD ROADWAY 10605 1 12 4 1700 30 11 320 206 62 SR 31 COLLECTOR 5825 1 10 4 1575 35 11 321 207 192 EMBANKMENT RD COLLECTOR 3900 1 1 12 2 1700 60 1 9 LOCAL 322 208 135 MECHANIC ST ROADWAY 2710 1 12 4 900 20 7 LOCAL 323 209 210 ,SR 130 ROADWAY 338 1 12 0 1350 30 7 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-38 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Sauain Fe Up Down Lan Flw Fo LOCAL 324 210 97 SR 130 ROADWAY 3377 1 12 0 1350 30 7 325 211 212 SR 130 COLLECTOR 1208 1 12 0 1700 60 7 326 212 98 SR 130 COLLECTOR 8118 1 12 0 1700 60 7 327 213 103 SIR 130 COLLECTOR 3176 1 12 0 1700 60 2 EXIT LINK 214 8214 SR 58 COLLECTOR 2044 1 1 10 0 1700 60 1 17 328 215 138 SR 58 COLLECTOR 10192 1 10 0 1700 60 17 LOCAL 329 216 215 COUNTOUR RD ROADWAY 303 1 10 0 1125 25 17 330 217 84 SR 58 COLLECTOR 643 1 10 0 1700 45 17 LOCAL 331 218 140 SR 58 ROADWAY 1024 1 10 0 1350 30 18 332 1219 217 SR 58 COLLECTOR 8564 1 10 10 1700 65 17 333 220 239 SR 31 COLLECTOR 895 1 12 4 1700 40 5 LOCAL 334 221 220 W 6TH ST ROADWAY 2447 1 12 4 1350 30 5 LOCAL 335 221 222 CHRISTIE ST ROADWAY 1785 1 12 4 1350 30 5 336 222 57 1ST ST COLLECTOR 2418 1 12 4 1575 35 5 LOCAL 337 223 81 KENNEBEC ST ROADWAY 2608 1 12 4 1700 30 14 LOCAL 338 223 153 KENNEBEC ST ROADWAY 2526 1 12 4 1350 30 14 339 224 6 W NEOSHO ST COLLECTOR 2536 1 12 4 1750 40 14 LOCAL 340 224 223 10TH ST ROADWAY 1658 1 12 4 1350 30 14 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-39 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 LULAL ROADWAY 341 224 225 I10TH ST 3656 1 12 4 1350 30 14 LOCAL 342 225 142 HOUSATONIC ST ROADWAY 2472 1 12 4 1350 30 14 LOCAL 343 225 234 HOUSATONIC ST ROADWAY 2710 1 12 4 1350 30 14 344 226 164 MAIN ST COLLECTOR 1636 1 12 4 1575 35 20 LOCAL 345 227 145 WILLOW BEND ROADWAY 1560 1 12 4 1350 30 14 346 228 10 US 75 COLLECTOR 4899 1 12 4 1700 75 9 347 228 11 US 75 COLLECTOR 10337 1 12 4 1700 75 9 348 229 20 REAPER RD COLLECTOR 10741 1 12 4 1700 45 9 349 230 228 20TH RD COLLECTOR 10825 1 12 4 1700 45 9 350 230 229 20TH RD COLLECTOR 15690 1 12 4 1700 45 9 351 231 8 US 75 COLLECTOR 3900 1 12 4 1700 40 9 352 231 91 US 75 COLLECTOR 6065 1 12 4 1700 40 9 353 231 93 15TH RD COLLECTOR 3967 1 12 4 1700 40 9 354 233 230 OXEN RD COLLECTOR 16006 1 12 4 1700 45 9 355 233 256 17TH RD COLLECTOR 7895 1 10 3 1700 50 9 LOCAL 356 234 225 HOUSATONIC ST ROADWAY 2710 1 12 4 1350 30 14 357 234 278 LYNX RD COLLECTOR 5280 1 12 4 1700 45 14 LOCAL 358 235 153 KENNEBEC ST ROADWAY 1873 1 12 4 1350 30 14 359 236 89 19TH RD COLLECTOR 18077 1 10 0 1700 65 8 LOCAL 360 237 236 IRIS LN ROADWAY 6018 1 12 4 1350 30 8 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-40 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 361 238 52 REAPER RD COLLECTOR 15920 1 12 4 1700 45 4 362 239 2 SR 31 COLLECTOR 2599 1 12 4 1700 40 5 LOCAL 363 240 239 W 8TH ST ROADWAY 1530 1 12 4 1350 30 5 364 241 129 WAYSIDE RD COLLECTOR 10706 1 10 0 1700 65 15 365 242 241 10TH RD COLLECTOR 10142 1 12 4 1700 45 15 366 243 5 US 75 COLLECTOR 13658 1 10 6 1700 65 14 367 243 125 US 75 COLLECTOR 13188 1 10 6 1700 65 14 368 244 243 7TH LN COLLECTOR 10703 1 12 4 1700 45 14 369 244 261 OXEN RD COLLECTOR 18428 1 12 4 1700 45 19 370 245 4 SR 58 COLLECTOR 5319 1 12 4 1700 65 19 371 246 245 NATIVE RD COLLECTOR 12999 1 12 4 1700 45 19 372 247 83 IRIS RD COLLECTOR 13190 1 12 4 1700 45 18 373 248 141 EMMER RD COLLECTOR 20582 1 12 4 1700 45 13 374 249 96 ANGUS RD COLLECTOR 10891 1 12 0 1700 65 7 375 250 249 14TH RD COLLECTOR 15988 1 12 4 1700 45 12 376 251 252 24TH RD COLLECTOR 10441 1 12 4 1700 45 3 377 252 49 SR 131 COLLECTOR 10508 1 10 0 1700 65 3 378 253 252 24TH RD COLLECTOR 10755 1 12 4 1700 45 3 379 254 19 22ND RD COLLECTOR 10427 1 10 2 1700 65 6 LOCAL 380 254 255 NW ARKANSAS RD ROADWAY 15820 1 12 4 1700 30 6 381 255 196 SR-31 COLLECTOR 9291 1 12 4 1700 65 6 382 256 86 17TH RD COLLECTOR 5273 1 10 3 1700 50 9 383 257 11 US 75 COLLECTOR 16107 1 12 4 1700 75 4 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-41 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 384 257 13 US 75 COLLECTOR 5085 1 12 4 1700 75 4 LOCAL 385 258 257 25TH RD ROADWAY 15577 1 12 4 1700 45 4 LOCAL 386 259 257 25TH RD ROADWAY 14465 1 12 4 1700 45 4 387 260 71 11TH RD COLLECTOR 9822 1 12 4 1700 55 14 388 260 168 11TH RD COLLECTOR 4670 1 12 4 1700 55 14 389 261 245 SR 58 COLLECTOR 5383 1 12 4 1700 65 19 390 262 264 SHETLAND RD COLLECTOR 5522 1 12 4 1700 65 15 391 263 262 10TH RD COLLECTOR 8408 1 12 4 1700 45 14 392 264 128 SHETLAND RD COLLECTOR 5093 1 12 4 1700 65 15 393 265 129 8TH RD COLLECTOR 15933 1 12 4 1700 40 15 394 266 81 LYNX RD COLLECTOR 5241 1 10 0 1700 40 14 395 267 83 IRIS RD COLLECTOR 15909 1 10 0 1700 45 13 396 268 267 8TH RD COLLECTOR 15575 1 12 4 1700 45 13 397 268 279 LYNX RD COLLECTOR 15806 1 12 4 1700 45 14 398 269 179 KAFIR RD COLLECTOR 433 1 10 0 1700 40 8 LOCAL 399 270 269 KAFIR RD ROADWAY 2692 1 12 4 1350 30 8 400 271 106 16TH RD COLLECTOR 5796 1 12 3 1700 65 9 401 272 69 12TH RD COLLECTOR 5432 1 10 0 1700 50 15 402 273 96 16TH RD COLLECTOR 23678 1 12 4 1700 40 7 403 274 127 10TH RD COLLECTOR 15696 1 12 4 1700 40 13 404 275 12 22ND RD COLLECTOR 15943 1 12 4 1700 40 8 405 276 157 1200 RD COLLECTOR 7928 1 10 0 1700 65 16 406 277 69 SHETLAND RD COLLECTOR 10626 1 12 4 1700 70 15 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-42 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 407 277 155 SHETLAND RD COLLECTOR 11452 1 12 4 1700 70 10 408 278 125 10TH RD COLLECTOR 5245 1 12 4 1700 40 14 409 278 126 10TH RD COLLECTOR 15808 1 12 4 1700 40 13 410 278 268 LYNX RD COLLECTOR 10638 1 12 4 1700 45 14 411 279 5 SR 58 COLLECTOR 5278 1 12 4 1700 40 19 412 279 83 SR 58 COLLECTOR 16015 1 12 4 1700 40 18 413 8022 22 1-35 FREEWAY 2563 2 12 8 2250 75 2 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-43 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Table K-2. Nodes in the Link-Node Analysis Network which are Controlled 1 2042490 1880585 Stop 12 2 2143207 1958215 Stop 5 4 2106743 1839536 Stop 19 5 2106677 1844822 Stop 19 6 2105732 1880429 Actuated 14 11 2106542 1935823 Stop 9 12 2069870 1934767 Stop 8 13 2106273 1957013 Stop 4 16 2106212 1965548 Stop 4 17 2106153 1966360 Stop 4 19 2186002 1938390 Stop 6 20 2133237 1936863 Stop 9 39 2178382 1990499 Stop 1 40 2178870 1989968 Stop 1 41 2142710 1975367 Stop 5 42 2142678 1976078 Stop 5 43 2132178 1974149 Stop 4 44 2132218 1973380 Stop 4 45 2069197 1963535 Stop 3 46 2069197 1964506 Stop 3 49 2069359 1955903 Stop 3 52 2132556 1957942 Stop 4 57 2143357 1952900 Stop 5 58 2185624 1954208 Stop 6 59 2184529 1987381 Stop 1 65 2184966 1889758 Yield 16 69 2137358 1882946 Stop 15 76 2138721 1840608 Stop 20 79 2186452 1842190 Stop 21 81 2100541 1882058 Stop 14 82 2069118 1881328 Stop 13 83 2085394 1844692 Stop 18 86 2105114 1909396 Stop 9 90 2084740 1881752 Stop 13 91 2105245 1904181 Stop 9 93 2101430 1898023 Yield 9 1 Coordinates are in the North American Datum of 1983 Kansas South Plane Zone Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-44 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 96 2041840 1902202 Stop 7 101 2032274 1955885 Stop 2 102 2032274 1956432 Stop 2 107 2143548 1937109 Stop 10 109 2203593 1907131 Yield 11 110 2158015 1905665 Stop 10 111 2158502 1883466 Stop 15 112 2159535 1841179 Stop 20 115 2043449 1933418 Stop 7 119 2184628 1906518 Stop 11 122 2159732 1937502 Stop 10 123 2159060 1953470 Stop 5 124 2158803 1961222 Stop 5 125 2105904 1871656 Stop 14 126 2084858 1871148 Stop 13 129 2159209 1862270 Stop 15 130 2185740 1863145 Stop 16 131 2143962 1840642 Stop 20 135 2041436 1920875 Stop 7 137 2042811 1870028 Stop 12 138 2043372 1848922 Stop 17 141 2064509 1844721 Stop 18 142 2105762 1876839 Stop 14 144 2105630 1884811 Actuated 14 153 2105674 1882126 Stop 14 155 2136538 1905009 Stop 10 157 2177118 1883933 Stop 16 158 2176678 1906295 Stop 11 159 2177336 1877056 Stop 16 164 2137189 1840620 Stop 20 174 2185649 1889720 Stop 16 184 2032274 1955010 Stop 2 204 2159954 1926813 Stop 10 205 2175949 1927391 Stop 11 206 2191855 1927970 Stop 11 209 2041772 1920869 Stop 7 220 2143332 1954723 Stop 5 222 2140939 1952886 Stop 5 Wolf Creek Generating Station KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-45 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I 223 2103148 1882130 Stop 14 224 2103196 1880473 Yield 14 225 2103290 1876819 Stop 14 228 2107125 1925503 Stop 9 229 2133633 1926129 Stop 9 230 2117946 1925787 Stop 9 231 2105396 1898117 Stop 9 234 2100580 1876778 Stop 14 236 2088886 1919381 Stop 8 241 2158495 1872964 Stop 15 243 2106294 1858475 Stop 14 245 2112057 1839776 Stop 19 249 2042312 1891320 Stop 12 252 2069620 1945398 Stop 3 254 2175582 1937990 Stop 6 255 2175007 1953800 Stop 6 257 2106399 1951930 Stop 4 261 2117430 1840098 Stop 19 262 2137508 1872357 Stop 15 267 2085293 1860603 Stop 13 269 2097245 1909210 Stop 8 278 2100662 1871499 Stop 14 279 2101405 1845066 Stop 19 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-46 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 APPENDIX L Subzone Boundaries L. SUBZONE BOUNDARIES Subzone CCL Subzone CTR Subzone E-1 Subzone E-2 Subzone JRR Subzone N-1 Subzone N-2 Subzone NE-1 Subzone NE-2 Subzone NE-3 Subzone NW-1 Subzone NW-2 CCL includes Coffey County Lake and adjacent land open to the public, including the Wolf Creek Environmental Education Areas.CTR is bordered on the west by Highway 75; on the north by 17th Road; on the east by Reaper Road; and on the south by i2th Road. CTR does not include Sharpe, New Strawn, or Burlington.

CTR does include Wolf Creek Generating Station or Country Estates subdivision.

Subzone E-1 is bordered on the west by Reaper Road; on the north by i6th Road; on the east by Underwood Road; and on the south by 12th Road.Subzone E-2 is bordered on the west by Underwood Road; on the north by 16th Road; on the east by Yearling Road; and on the south by 12th Road.JRR includes all areas on and immediately adjacent to John Redmond Reservoir.

JRR does not include the towns of New Strawn, Ottumwa, or Jacob's Creek.Subzone N-1 is bordered on the west by Highway 75; on the north by 20th Road; on the east by Quail Road; and on the south by i7th Road. N-1 includes Sharpe and the Coffey County Airport.Subzone N-2 is bordered on the west by Highway 75; on the north by Old Highway 50; on the east by Quail Road; and on the south by 20th Road. N-2 includes Halls Summit.Subzone NE-1 is bordered on the west by Quail Road; on the north by 20th Road; on the east by Trefoil Road; and on the south by 16th Road.Subzone NE-2 is bordered on the west by Quail Road; on the north by Old Highway 50; on the east by Trefoil Road; and on the south by 20th Road. NE-2 includes Waverly and the Sunset Manor Nursing Home.Subzone NE-3 is bordered on the west by Trefoil Road; on the north by 22nd Road; on the east by Yearling Road; and on the south by 16th Road.Subzone NW-1 is bordered on the west by Homestead Road; on the north by 20th Road; on the east by Highway 75; and on the south by i7th Road. NW-1 includes Ottumwa.Subzone NW-2 is bordered on the west by Homestead Road from 20th Road to 22nd Road, and by Iris Road from 22nd Road to Old Highway 50; on the north by Old Highway 50; on the east by Highway 75; and on the south by 22nd Road.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate L-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Subzone S-1 Subzone S-2 Subzone SE-i Subzone SE-2 Subzone SE-3 Subzone SE-4 Subzone SW-1 Subzone SW-2 Subzone W-1 Subzone W-2 Subzone S-1 is bordered on the west by Highway 75; on the north by 12th Road from Highway 75 east to Native Road then by 11th Road from Native Road east to Quail Road; on the east by Quail Road; and on the south by 9th Road.Subzone S-2 is bordered on the west by Highway 75: on the north by 9th Road; on the east by Quail Road; and on the south by Highway 58. S-2 includes Quail Meadows subdivision.

Subzone SE-1 is bordered on the west by Quail Road; on the north by 12th Road; on the east by Trefoil Road; and on the south by 9th Road.Subzone SE-2 is bordered on the west by Trefoil Road; on the north by 12th Road; on the east by Yearling Road; and on the south by 8th Road. SE-2 includes Aliceville.

Subzone SE-3 is bordered on the west by Quail Road; on the north by 9th Road; on the east by Trefoil Road; and on the south by Highway 58. SE-3 includes LeRoy.Subzone SE-4 is bordered on the west by Trefoil Road; on the north by 8th Road; on the east by Wayside Road; and on the south by Highway 58.Subzone SW-1 is bordered on the west by Iris Road; on the north by 13th Road; on the east by Highway 75; and on the south by 10th Road. SW-1 includes Burlington.

Subzone SW-2 is bordered on the west by Iris Road; on the north by 10th Road; on the east by Highway 75; and on the south by Highway 58.Subzone W-1 is bordered on the west by Juneberry Road; on the north by 17th Road; on the east by Highway 75; and on the south by 13th Road. W-1 includes New Strawn, Remers Point and Hillview Addition, but not Burlington.

Subzone W-2 is bordered on the west by Emmer Road; on the northeast by John Redmond Reservoir; on the east by Iris Road; and on the south by 10th Road. W-2 includes Jacobs Creek.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate L-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 APPENDIX M Evacuation Sensitivity Studies M. EVACUATION SENSITIVITY STUDIES This appendix presents the results of a series of sensitivity analyses.

These analyses are designed to identify the sensitivity of the ETE to changes in some base evacuation conditions.

M.1 Effect of Changes in Trip Generation Times A sensitivity study was performed to determine whether changes in the estimated trip generation time have an effect on the ETE for the entire EPZ. Specifically, if the tail of the mobilization distribution were truncated (i.e., if those who responded most slowly to the Advisory to Evacuate, could be persuaded to respond much more rapidly), how would the ETE be affected?

The case considered was Scenario 6, Region 3; a winter, midweek, midday, good weather evacuation of the entire EPZ. Table M-1 presents the results of this study.Table M-1. Evacuation Time Estimates for Trip Generation Sensitivity Study Trip~~~~~

Evcato TieEtmt frEtr Geeato Peio 90 .1 Pecntl 00t Pecntl 2 Hours 15 Minutes I 1:50 I 2:30 3 Hours 15 Minutes 1:50 3:25 4 Hours 15 Minutes (Base) 1:50 4:25 The results confirm the importance of accurately estimating the trip generation (mobilization) times. The ETE for the 1 0 0 th percentile closely mirror the values for the time the last evacuation trip is generated.

In contrast, the 90th percentile ETE is less sensitive to truncating the tail of the mobilization time distribution.

As indicated in Section 7.3, traffic congestion within the EPZ clears at about 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> after the ATE, well before the completion of trip generation time. The results indicate that programs to educate the public and encourage them toward faster responses for a radiological emergency, translates into shorter ETE at the 1 0 0 th percentile.

The results also justify the guidance to employ the [stable] 9 0 th percentile ETE for protective action decision making.Wolf Creek Generating Station M-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 M.2 Effect of Changes in the Number of People in the Shadow Region Who Relocate A sensitivity study was conducted to determine the effect on ETE of changes in the percentage of people who decide to relocate from the Shadow Region. The case considered was Scenario 6, Region 3; a winter, midweek, midday, good weather evacuation for the entire EPZ. The movement of people in the Shadow Region has the potential to impede vehicles evacuating from an Evacuation Region within the EPZ. Refer to Sections 3.2 and 7.1 for additional information on population within the shadow region.Table M-2 presents the evacuation time estimates for each of the cases considered.

The results show that the ETE is not impacted by shadow evacuation from 0% to 20%. Tripling the shadow percentage increases the ETE by 5 minutes at the 9 0 th percentile

-not a material change. Note, the telephone survey results presented in Appendix F indicate that 19% of households would elect to evacuate if advised to shelter. Thus, the base assumption of 20% non-compliance suggested in NUREG/CR-7002 is valid.Table M-2. Evacuation Time Estimates for Shadow Sensitivity Study 0 0 1:50 4:25 10 128 1:50 4:25 20 (Base) 256 1:50 4:25 60 768 1:55 4:25 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate M-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 M.3 Effect of Changes in EPZ Resident Population A sensitivity study was conducted to determine the effect on ETE of changes in the resident population within the study area (EPZ plus Shadow Region). As population in the study area changes over time, the time required to evacuate the public may increase, decrease, or remain the same. Since the ETE is related to the demand to capacity ratio present within the study area, changes in population will cause the demand side of the equation to change. The sensitivity study was conducted using the following planning assumptions:

1. The percent change in population within the study area was increased to 130%. Changes in population were applied to permanent residents only (as per federal guidance), in both the EPZ area and in the Shadow Region.2. The transportation infrastructure remained fixed; the presence of new roads or highway capacity improvements were not considered.

3. The study was performed for the 2-Mile Region (R01), the 5-Mile Region (R02) and the entire EPZ (R03).4. The scenario which yielded the highest ETE values was selected as the case to be considered in this sensitivity study (Scenario 8).Table M-3 presents the results of the sensitivity study.Section IV of Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, and NUREG/CR-7002, Section 5.4, require licensees to provide an updated ETE analysis to the NRC when a population increase within the EPZ causes ETE values (for the 2-Mile Region, 5-Mile Region or entire EPZ) to increase by 25 percent or 30 minutes, whichever is less. Note that all of the base ETE values, except the 9 0 th percentile ETE for the 2-milre region, are greater than 20 hours2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br />; 25 percent of the base ETE is always greater than 30 minutes. Therefore, 30 minutes is the lesser and is the criterion for updating at the 1 0 0 th percentile.

Twenty-five percent of the 90th percentile ETE for the 2-mile region (1:30) is 23 minutes, which is less than 30 minutes.Those percent population changes which result in ETE changes greater than 30 minutes or 23 minutes for the 2-mile region at the 9 0 th percentile, are highlighted in red below -a 130%increase in the EPZ population.

WCNOC will have to estimate the EPZ population on an annual basis. If the EPZ population increases by 130% or more an updated ETE analysis will be needed.Wolf Creek Generating Station M-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Table M-3. ETE Variation with Population Change Poplaio Chng Reiden Base 50S10 10 Pouain 6,9,9 1239 14,5 T for 90hPecntl Population Change Region Base 50%100%130%2-MILE 1:30 1:40 1:50 1:55 5-MILE 2:30 2:35 2:35 2:35 FULL EPZ 2:40 2:40 2:45 2:45 Population Change Region Base 50% 100% 130%2-MILE 5:15 5:15 5:15 5:15 5-MILE 5:20 5:20 5:20 5:20 FULL EPZ 5:25 5:25 5:25 5:25 M-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate M-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 APPENDIX N ETE Criteria Checklist N. ETE CRITERIA CHECKLIST Table N-1. ETE Review Criteria Checklist R Reie CrtraCrtro Addese Comet 1.0 Introduction

a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area Yes Section 1 should be described.

b. A map should be included that identifies primary features Yes Figures 1-1, 3-1 of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be Yes Table 1-3 provided and includes similar information as identified in Table 1-1, "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002.

1.1 Approach a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained Yes Section 1.3 during the field survey of the roadway network should be provided.b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, Yes Section 2.1 large employers, and special events should be identified.

Section 3 c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control Yes Section 1.3, Section 2.3, Section 9, plans in the analysis.

Appendix G d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be Yes Section 1.3, Table 1-3, Appendix B, identified by name and version. Appendix C Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NR Reie Crtei Crtro Adrse Comments in EAnayi e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be described.

Yes Section 3 -avoid double counting Section 5, Appendix F -5.4% sampling error at 95% confidence interval for telephone survey 1.2 Assumptions

a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption Yes Section 2.3 -Assumption 1 that the evacuation should be ordered promptly and no Section 5.1 early protective actions have been implemented.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Yes Sections 2.2, 2.3 Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and include the basis to support their use.1.3 Scenario Development

a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, Yes Tables 2-1, 6-2 should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason should be provided for use of other scenarios.

1.3.1 Staged Evacuation

a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in Yes Sections 5.4.2, 7.2 development of a staged evacuation.

1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas a. A map of EPZ with emergency response planning areas Yes Figures 3-1, 6-1 (ERPAs) should be included.b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs Yes Tables 6-1, 7-5 considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction in each sector.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NRC~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ReiwCieraCieio drsedCm et c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations.

Yes Tables 6-1, 7-5 2.0 Demand Estimation

a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four Yes Permanent residents, employees, population groups, including permanent residents of the transients

-Section 3, Appendix E EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools. Special facilities, schools -Section 8, Appendix E 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. The US Census should be the source of the population Yes Section 3.1 values, or another credible source should be provided.b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for Yes 2010 used as the base year for analysis growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE.c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, Yes Figure 3-2"Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for permanent residents.

2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles a. The persons per vehicle value should be between l and 2 Yes 1.65 persons per vehicle -Table 1-3 or justification should be provided for other values.b. Major employers should be listed. Yes Appendix E -Table E-3 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

.R Reie Crtei Critrio Addese Comment i n E E A n a y i 2.1.2 Transient Population

a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4, Appendix E should be included, and peak and average attendance for these facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided.b. The average population during the season should be used, Yes Tables 3-4, 3-5 and Appendix E itemize the itemized and totaled for each scenario.

transient population and employee estimates.

These estimates are multiplied by the scenario specific percentages provided in Table 6-3 to estimate average transient population by scenario.c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4 facilities should be estimated.

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided.

Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4 Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why values vary should be provided.e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 Yes Figure 3-6 -transients of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution Figure 3-8 -employees for the transient population.

2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit Yes Section 8.1, Table 8-1 dependent residents should be discussed.

b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group Yes Section 8.1, Tables 8-5, 8-10 should be quantified.

c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent Yes Sections 8.1, 8.4 residents should be used in the analysis.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NR Reie Crtei Crtro Adrse Comments in EAnayi d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided.

Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data.Yes Section 8.5 e. Capacities should be provided for all types of Yes Section 2.3 -Assumption 10 transportation resources.

Bus seating capacity of 50% Sections 3.5, 8.1 through 8.6 should be used or justification should be provided for higher values.f. An estimate of this population should be provided and Yes Table 8-1 -transit dependents information should be provided that the existing Section 8.5 -special needs registration programs were used in developing the estimate.

Page 8-3 g. A summary table of the total number of buses, Yes Section 8.4 -page 8-6 ambulances, or other transport needed to support Table 8-5 evacuation should be provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred.2.3 Special Facility Residents a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, Yes Appendix E, Table E-2 -medical facilities, location, and average population should be provided.

E-5 -correctional facilities Special facility staff should be included in the total special facility population.

b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility Yes Sections 8.3, 8.6 data was obtained.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NR Reie Crtei Crtro Adrse Comments inEEAayi c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided.Yes Sections 8.3, 8.5 Table 8-4 d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles Yes Section 8.3, 8.4 needed to support the evacuation of the facility should be Tables 8-4, 8-5 provided.e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., Yes Section 8.4 -page 8-9 medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate.

2.4 Schools a. A list of schools including name, location, student Yes Tables 8-2, E-1 population, and transportation resources required to Section 8.2 support the evacuation, should be provided.

The source of this information should be provided.b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle Yes Table 8-2 schools should be based on 100% of the school capacity.c. The estimate of high school students who will use their Yes Section 8.2 personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis for the values used should be discussed.

d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary.

Yes There are sufficient resources to evacuate schools in a single wave. However, Section 8.4 and Figure 8-1 discuss the potential for a multiple wave evacuation Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NR Reie Crtei Crtro Adrse Comment 2.5.1 Special Events a. A complete list of special events should be provided and Yes Section 3.7 includes information on the population, estimated duration, and season of the event.b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient Yes Section 3.7 population should be analyzed in the ETE.c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event Yes Section 3.7 should be estimated.

2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for Yes Section 2.2 -Assumption 5 areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles Figures 2-1, 7-1 from the NPP.Section 3.2 b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 Yes Section 3.2 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. Figure 3-4 Table 3-3 c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway Yes Section 5 -Table 5-9 network should be consistent with the trip generation time generated for the permanent resident population.

2.5.3 Background and Pass Through Traffic a. The volume of background traffic and pass through traffic Yes Sections 3.6, 6 is based on the average daytime traffic. Values may be Tables 3-6, 6-3, 6-4 reduced for nighttime scenarios.

Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

.R Reie Crtei Crtro Adrse Comments5 Iin -T Analysis b. Pass through traffic is assumed to have stopped entering the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification.

Yes Section 2.3 -Assumption 5 Section 3.6 Table 6-3 -footnote 2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation

a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the Yes total populations and total vehicles used in analysis for Tables 3-7, 3-8 permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-through demand used in each scenario.3.0 Roadway Capacity a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be Yes Section 4 discussed.

3.1 Roadway Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been Yes Section 1.3 conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of Yes Section 1.3 the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the analysis.c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway Yes Appendix K, Table K-1 Characteristics," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided.d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should Yes Section 4 be provided.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NR Reie Crtei Crtro AdrseCm et e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002.Yes Appendix K, Figures K-1 through K-22 present the entire link-node analysis network at a scale suitable to identify all links and nodes 3.2 Capacity Analysis a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for Yes Section 4 the transportation network should be described in detail and identifies factors that should be expressly used in the modeling.b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information Yes Sections 1.3, 4 should be used in the ETE calculation.

3.3 Intersection Control a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the Yes Appendix K, Table K-2 total number of intersections modeled that are unsignalized, signalized, or manned by response personnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections Yes Table J-1 within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle length, and turn lane queue capacity.c. Discussion should be provided on how signal cycle time is Yes Section 4.1, Appendix C used in the calculations.

Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NR Reie Crtei Critrio Addese Coment 3.4 Adverse Weather a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and Yes Section 2.3 -Assumption 9 the effects of adverse weather on mobilization time Table 2-1 should be considered.

Mobilization time- Table 2-2, Section 5.3 (page. 5-10)b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Yes Table 2-2 -based on HCM 2010. The Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 factors provided in Table 3-1 of should be used or a basis should be provided for other NUREG/CR-7002 are from HCM 2000.values.c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on Yes Section 5.3 -page 5-10 streets and driveways, when applicable.

Appendix F -Section F.3.3 4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time a. The process used to develop trip generation times should Yes Section 5 be identified.

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the Yes Appendix F survey, area of survey, number of participants, and statistical relevance should be provided.c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be Yes Appendix F summarized.

d. The trip generation time for each population group should Yes Section 5, Appendix F be developed from site specific information.

Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

.R Reie Crtei Critrio Addese Comment 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times.Trip generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating.

Yes Section 5 discusses trip generation for households with and without returning commuters.

Table 6-3 presents the percentage of households with returning commuters and the percentage of households either without returning commuters or with no commuters.

Appendix F presents the percent households who will await the return of commuters.

Section 2.3 -Assumption 3 b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method Yes Section 5.4.3 used to notify transients.

The trip generation time discusses any difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds.

c. The trip generation time accounts for transients Yes Section 5, Figure 5-1 potentially returning to hotels prior to evacuating.

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during Yes Section 3.7 discusses special event. No special events where a large number of transients should public transportation used.be expected should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population Yes Section 5, Table 5-9 should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network with the general public.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Revie Crtei Crteio AdrseCm et in ET Analysis 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents a. If available, existing plans and bus routes should be used Yes Section 8.4 -pages 8-7, 8-8. Pre-in the ETE analysis.

If new plans should be developed with established bus routes do not exist. Basic the ETE, they have been agreed upon by the responsible bus routes were developed for the ETE authorities, analysis -see Figure 8-2, Table 8-10.b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating Yes Sections 8.4, 8.5 ambulatory and non-ambulatory residents.

c. The number, location, and availability of buses, and other Yes Section 8.4 resources needed to support the demand estimation Tables 8-5, 8-10 should be provided.d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief Yes Section 8.4, Figure 8-1 drivers, and initiate the bus route should be provided.e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit Yes Section 8.4 -page 8-8 dependent residents to prepare and travel to a bus pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to the pickup point.f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load Yes Section 8.4 -pages 8-5, 8-6 passengers should be discussed.

g. A map of bus routes should be included.

Yes Figure 8-2 h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons Yes Sections 8.4, 8.5 includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special Tables 8-17, 8-18 vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis i.Information should be provided to supports analysis of return trips, if necessary.

Yes Sections 8.4, 8.5 Figure 8-1 Tables 8-11 through 8-13 4.1.3 Special Facilities

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times Yes Sections 8.4, 8.6 should be provided.

Tables 8-7 through 8-9, 8-14 through 8-16 b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and Yes Section 8.4 outbound speeds.c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals Yes Tables 8-4, 8-14 through 8-16 should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents should be discussed.

d. Time for loading of residents should be provided Yes Section 8.4 -page 8-9 Section 8.6 e. Information should be provided that indicates whether Yes Section 8.4 the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trips should be needed.f. If return trips should be needed, the destination of Yes Section 8.4 vehicles should be provided.g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility Yes Section 2.3 -Assumption 7h residents are expected to pass through the reception Section 8.4 center prior to being evacuated to their final destination.

Section 10 Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NR Reie Crtei Crtro Adrese Comment in E nayi h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips.Yes Section 8.4 (page 8-10), Section 8.6 Tables 8-11 through 8-13 4.1.4 Schools a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization time Yes Section 8.4 should be provided.b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and Yes School bus routes are presented in Table outbound speeds. 8-6.School bus speeds are presented in Tables 8-7 (good weather), 8-8 (rain) and 8-9 (snow). Outbound speeds are defined as the minimum of the evacuation route speed and the State school bus speed limit.Inbound speeds are limited to the State school bus speed limit.c. Time for loading of students should be provided.

Yes Discussion in Section 8.4 Tables 8-7 through 8-9 d. Information should be provided that indicates whether Yes Section 8.4 -page 8-6 the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trips are needed.e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses Yes Return trips are not needed for school should be provided, evacuation Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

..Reie Crtei Crtro Addesse Comment f. If used, reception centers should be identified.

Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to pass through the reception center prior to being evacuated to their final destination.

Yes Table 8-3. Students are evacuated to the reception and care center where they will be picked up by parents or guardians.

g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the Yes Return trips are not needed. Tables 8-7 time elements for the return trips. through and 8-9 provide time needed to arrive at reception and care center, which could be used to compute a second wave evacuation if necessary 4.2 ETE Modeling a. General information about the model should be provided Yes DYNEV II (Ver. 4.0.9.0).

Section 1.3, Table and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. 1-3, Appendix B, Appendix C b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE N/A Not applicable as a traffic simulation calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate model was used the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate.

4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative Yes Appendices B and C describe the set of model inputs should be provided, simulation model assumptions and algorithms Table J-2 Wolf Creek Generating Station KLD Engineering, P.C.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 SReie Crieri Crtro Adrese Co met D. A glossary of terms sMould ne provided tor tie Key performance measures and parameters used in the analysis.Yes Appendix A Tables C-1, C-2 4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation Yes Appendix B model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE should be provided.b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided Yes 1. Table J-5.to support review: 2. Table J-3.1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit 3. Table J-1.node. 4. Table J-3.2. Network wide average travel time. 5. Figures J-1 through J-14 (one plot 3. Longest queue length for the 10 intersections with the for each scenario considered).

highest traffic volume. 6. Table J-4. Network wide average 4. Total vehicles exiting the network. speed also provided in Table J-3.5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various Yes Figures 7-3 through 7-5 times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service (LOS) "E" and LOS "F" conditions, if they occur.Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 SReie Crieri Crtro Adrese Co m ns 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and Yes Tables 7-1, 7-2 100% of the total permanent resident and transient population

b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all Yes Section 5.4- truncating survey data to members of the general public. Any reductions or eliminate statistical outliers truncated data should be explained.

Table 7-2 -1 0 0 th percentile ETE for general public c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs Yes Tables 7-3, 7-4 similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002.

d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of Yes Sections 8.4, 8.6 special facilities, transit dependent, and school Tables 8-7 through 8-9, 8-11 through 8-16 populations.

5.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans a. Information that responsible authorities have approved Yes Section 9, Appendix G the traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided.b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic Yes Appendix G control plan that affect the ETE should be provided.5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation Yes /Appendix M time should be provided.

_Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I

.R Reie Crtei Crtro Addese Coment b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of enhancements to local authorities should be provided.Yes Results of the ETE study were formally presented to local authorities at the final project meeting. Recommended enhancements were discussed.

5.3 State and Local Review a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction Yes Table 1-1 with these agencies should be discussed.

b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues Yes No unresolved issues.that may affect the ETE.5.4 Reviews and Updates a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required / Yes Appendix M, Section M.3 to be performed and submitted to the NRC. j 5.5 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers Yes Figure 10-1 should be provided.b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate Yes Section 8.4 discusses a multi-wave return times for buses should be provided.

evacuation procedure.

Figure 8-1 c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers Yes Section 2.3 -Assumption 7h are left at the reception center and are taken by separate Section 10 buses to the congregate care center.Technical Reviewer Date Supervisory Review Date Wolf Creek Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1