ML13281A393
| ML13281A393 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 09/24/2013 |
| From: | Constellation Energy Nuclear Group |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13281A389 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML13281A393 (26) | |
Text
LCO Applicability B 3.0 B 3.0 LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION (LCO) APPLICABILITY BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-1 Revision 35 LCOs Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.0.1 through LCO 3.0.9 establish the general requirements applicable to all Specifications and apply at all times unless otherwise
stated. LCO 3.0.1 Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.1 establishes the
Applic ability statement within each individual Specification
for when the LCO is required to be met (i.e., when the unit
is in the MODEs or other specified conditions of the
Applicability statement of each Specification).
LCO 3.0.2 Limiting Condition for Operat ion 3.0.2 establishes that, upon discovery of a failure to meet an LCO, the associated
ACTIONS shall be met. The Completion Time of each Required
Action for an ACTIONS Condition is applicable when an
ACTIONS Condition is entered. The Required Actions
est ablish those remedial measures that must be taken within
specified Completion Times when the requirements of an LCO
are not met. This Specification establishes:
- a. Completion of the Required Actions within the specified Completion Times constitutes compli ance with a
Specification; and
- b. Completion of the Required Actions is not required when
an LCO is met within the specified Completion Time, unless otherwise specified.
There are two basic types of Required Actions. The first
type of Required Action sp ecifies a time limit for meeting
the LCO. This time limit is the Completion Time to restore
an inoperable system or component to OPERABLE status or to
restore variables to within specified limits. If this type
of Required Action is not completed within t he specified
Completion Time, a shutdown may be required to place the
unit in a MODE or condition in which the Specification is
not applicable. (Whether stated as a Required Action or
not, correction of the entered Condition is an action that
may always b e considered upon entering ACTIONS.) The second
type of Required Action specifies the remedial measures, permit t ing continued operation of the unit, that are not further restricted by the Completion Time. In this case, LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-2 Revision 2 compliance with the Required Acti ons provides an acceptable level of safety for continued operation.
Completing the Required Actions is not required when an LCO
is met or is no longer applicable, unless otherwise stated
in the individual Specifications.
The nature of some Required Act ions of some Conditions
necessitates that, once the Condition is entered, the
Required Actions must be completed even though the
associated Conditions no longer exist. The individual LCO's
ACTIONS specify the Required Actions where this is the case (e.g., LCO 3.4.3). The Completion Times of the Required Actions are also
applicable when a system or component is removed from
service intentionally. The reasons for intentionally
relying on the ACTIONS include, but are not limited to, performance of Surveill ance Requirements (SR s), preventive maintenance, corrective maintenance, or investigation of
operational problems. Entering ACTIONS for these reasons
must be done in a manner that does not compromise safety.
Intentional entry into ACTIONS should not be m ade for operational convenience. Additionally, if intentional entry
into ACTIONS would result in redundant equipment being inoperable, alternatives should be used
. Doing so limits the time both subsystems/trains of a safety function are
inoperable and li mits the time conditions exist that may result in LCO 3.0.3 being entered. Individual
Specifications may state a time limit for performing an SR when equipment is removed from service or bypassed for
testing. In this case, the Completion Times of the Req uired Actions are applicable when this time limit expires if the equipment remains removed from service or bypassed.
When a change in MODE or other specified condition is
required to comply with Required Actions, the unit may enter
a MODE or other specif ied condition in which another
Specification becomes applicable. In this case, the
Completion Times of the associated Required Actions would
apply when the new Specification becomes applicable and the ACTIONS Condition(s) are entered.
LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-3 Revision 2 LCO 3.0.3 Limiting Condition for Ope r ation 3.0.3 establishes the actions that must be implemented when an LCO is not met and:
- a. An associated Required Action and Completion Time is not met and no other Condition applies; or
- b. The condition of the unit is not specifically a ddressed by the associated ACTIONS. This means that no
combination of Conditions stated in the ACTIONS can be
made that exactly corresponds to the actual condition
of the unit. Sometimes, possible combinations of
Conditions are such that entering LCO 3.0.3 is warranted; in such cases, the ACTIONS specifically
state a Condition corresponding to such combinations
and also that LCO 3.0.3 be entered immediately.
This Specification delineates the time limits for placing
the unit in a safe MODE
, or other spec ified condition when operation cannot be maintained within the limits for safe
operation , as defined by the LCO and its ACTIONS. It is not intended to be used as an operational convenience that
permits routine
, voluntary removal of redundant systems or co mponents from service in lieu of other alternatives that
would not result in redundant systems or components being
Upon entering LCO 3.0.3, 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> is allowed to prepare for an
orderly shutdown before initiating a change in unit
operation. Th is includes time to permit the operator to
coordinate the reduction in electrical generation with the
load dispatcher to ensure the stability and availability of
the electrical grid. The time limits specified to reach
lower MODEs of operation permit the s hutdown to proceed in a controlled and orderly manner well within the specified maximum cooldown rate and capabilities of the unit, assuming only the minimum required equipment is OPERABLE. This
reduces thermal stresses on components of the Reactor
Coolan t System and the potential for a plant upset that
could challenge safety systems under the conditions to which this Specification applies. The use and interpretation of
specified times to complete the actions of LCO 3.0.3 are
consistent with the discussio n of Section 1.3, Completion
Times.
LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-4 Revision 2 A unit shutdown required in accordance with LCO 3.0.3 may be terminated
, and LCO 3.0.3 exited
, if any of the following occurs: a. The LCO has been met. b. A Condition exists for which the Required Actions have been per formed. c. ACTIONS exist that do not have expired Completion
Times. These Completion Times are applicable from that point in time the Condition is initially entered
, and not from the time LCO 3.0.3 is exited.
The time limits of Specification 3.0.3 allow 37 hours4.282407e-4 days <br />0.0103 hours <br />6.117725e-5 weeks <br />1.40785e-5 months <br /> for
the unit to be in MODE 5 when a shutdown is required during
MODE 1 operation. If the unit is in a lower MODE of
operation when a shutdown is required, the time limit for
reaching the next lower MODE applies. If a lower MODE is
reached in le ss time than allowed, however, the total
allowable time to reach MODE 5, or other applicable MODE, is
not reduced. For example, if MODE 3 is reached in 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, the time allowed for reaching MODE 4 is the next 11 hours1.273148e-4 days <br />0.00306 hours <br />1.818783e-5 weeks <br />4.1855e-6 months <br />, because the total time for reaching MODE 4 is not reduced
from the allowable limit of 13 hours1.50463e-4 days <br />0.00361 hours <br />2.149471e-5 weeks <br />4.9465e-6 months <br />. Therefore, if
remedial measures are completed that would permit a return
to MODE 1, a penalty is not incurred by having to reach a
lower MODE of operation in less than the total time allowed.
In MODEs 1, 2, 3, and 4, LCO 3.0.3 provides actions for Conditions not covered in other Specifications. The
requirements of LCO 3.0.3 do not apply in MODEs 5 and 6 , because the unit is already in the most restrictive
Condition required
. The requirements of LCO 3.0.3 do not apply in other
specified conditions of the Applicability (unless in MODE 1,
2, 3, or 4), because the ACTIONS of individual Specifications sufficiently define the remedial measures to
be taken. Exceptions to LCO 3.0.3 are provided in i nstances where requiring a unit shutdown, in accordance with
LCO 3.0.3, would not provide appropriate remedial measures
for the associated condition of the unit. An example of
this is in LCO 3.7.13. Limiting Condition for Operation 3.7.13 has an Applicab ility of "During movement of
LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-5 Revision 26 irradiated fuel assemblies in the spent fuel pool."
Therefore, this LCO can be applicable in any or all MODEs.
If the LCO and the Required Actions of LCO 3.7.13 are not
met while in MODE 1, 2, or 3, there is no safety benef it to be gained by placing the unit in a shutdown condition. The
Required Action of LCO 3.7.13 of "Suspend movement of
irradiated fuel assemblies in spent fuel pool" is the
appropriate Required Action to complete in lieu of the
actions of LCO 3.0.3. Thes e exceptions are addressed in the
individual Specifications.
LCO 3.0.4 Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.4 establishes limitations on changes in MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability when an LCO is not met. It
allows placing the un it in a MODE or other specified condition stated in that Applicability (e.g., the Applicability desired to be entered) when unit conditions are such that the requirements of the LCO would not be met
, in accordance with LCO 3.0.4.a, LCO 3.0.4.b, or LCO 3.0.
4.c. Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.4.a allows entry into a MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability with the LCO not met when the associated ACTIONS to be entered permit continued operation in the MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability for an unlimited period of time. Compliance with Required Actions that permit continued operation of the unit for an unlimited period of
time in a MODE or other specified condition provides an
acceptable level of safety for continued ope ration. This is
without regard to the status of the unit before or after the
MODE change. Therefore, in such cases, entry into a MODE or
other specified condition in the Applicability may be made
in accordance with the provisions of the Required Actions.
Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.4.b allows entry into a MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability with the LCO not met after performance of a risk assessment addressing inoperable systems and components, consideration of the results, de termination of the acceptability of entering the MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability, and establishment of risk management actions, if appropriate.
LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-6 Revision 26 The risk assessment may use quantitative, qualitative, or blended approaches, and the ri sk assessment will be conducted using the plant program, procedures, and criteria in place to implement 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4), which requires that risk impacts of maintenance activities be assessed and managed. The risk assessment, for the purposes of LCO 3.0.4.b, must take into account all inoperable Technical Specification equipment regardless of whether the equipment is included in the normal 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) risk assessment scope. The risk assessments will be conducted using the procedures and guidance endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.182, "Assessing and Managing Risk Before Maintenance Activities at Nuclear Power Plants." Regulatory Guide 1.182 endorses the guidance in Section 11 of NUMARC 93
-01, "Industry Guideline for Monitoring the Effectiveness of M aintenance at Nuclear Power Plants."
These documents address general guidance for conduct of the risk assessment, quantitative and qualitative guidelines for establishing risk management actions, and contain example risk management actions. These include actions to plan and conduct other activities in a manner that controls overall risk, increased risk awareness by shift and management personnel, actions to reduce the duration of the condition, actions to minimize the magnitude of risk increases (establis hment of backup success paths or compensatory measures), and determination that the proposed MODE change is acceptable. Consideration should also be given to the probability of completing restoration such that the requirements of the LCO would be met prior to the expiration of ACTIONS Completion Times that would require exiting the Applicability.
Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.4.b may be used with single, or multiple systems and components unavailable.
NUMARC 93-01 provides guidance relative to cons ideration of simultaneous unavailability of multiple systems and components.
The results of the risk assessment shall be considered in determining the acceptability of entering the MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability, and any correspond ing risk management actions.
The LCO 3.0.4.b risk assessments do not have to be documented.
LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-7 Revision 26 The Technical Specifications allow continued operation with equipment unavailable in MODE 1 for the duration of the Completion Time. Since this is allowable, and since in general the risk impact in that particular MODE bounds the risk of transitioning into and through the applicable MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability of the LCO, the use of the LCO 3.0.4.b allowance should be generally accepta ble, as long as the risk is assessed and managed as stated above. However, there is a small subset of systems and components that have been determined to be more important to risk and use of the LCO 3.0.4.b allowance is prohibited. The LCOs governing the se system and components contain Notes prohibiting the use of LCO 3.0.4.b by stating that LCO 3.0.4.b is not applicable.
Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.4.c allows entry into a MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability with the LCO not m et based on a Note in the Specification which states LCO 3.0.4.c is applicable. These specific allowances permit entry into MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability when the associated ACTIONS to be entered do not provide for continued ope ration for an unlimited period of time and a risk assessment has not been performed. This allowance may apply to all the ACTIONS or to a specific Required Action of a Specification. The risk assessments performed to justify the use of LCO 3.0.4.b usually only consider systems and components. For this reason, LCO 3.0.4.c is typically applied to Specifications which describe values and parameters (e.g., Pressurizer), and may be applied to other Specifications based on NRC plant
-specific approval.
The prov isions of this Specification should not be interpreted as endorsing the failure to exercise the good practice of restoring systems or components to OPERABLE status before entering an associated MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability.
The p rovisions of LCO 3.0.4 shall not prevent changes in MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability that are required to comply with ACTIONS. In addition, the provisions of LCO 3.0.4 shall not prevent changes in MODES or other specified condition s in the Applicability that LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-8 Revision 26 result from any unit shutdown.
In this context, a unit shutdown is defined as a change in MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability associated with transitioning from MODE 1 to MODE 2, MODE 2 to MODE 3, MODE 3 to M ODE 4, and MODE 4 to MODE 5.
Upon entry into a MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability with the LCO not met, LCO 3.0.1 and LCO 3.0.2 require entry into the applicable Conditions and Required Actions until the Condition is resolved, until th e LCO is met, or until the unit is not within the Applicability of the Technical Specification.
Surveillance s do not have to be performed on the associated inoperable equipment (or on variables outside the specified limits), as permitted by SR 3.0.1. Th erefore, utilizing LCO 3.0.4 is not a violation of SR 3.0.1 or SR 3.0.4 for any SRs that have not be en performed on inoperable equipment.
However, SRs must be met to ensure OPERABILITY prior to
declaring the associated equipment OPERABLE (or variable
with in limits) and restoring compliance with the affected
LCO.
LCO 3.0.5 Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.5 establishes the allowance for restoring equipment to service under
administrative controls when it has been removed from
service or declared inope rable to comply with ACTIONS. The
sole purpose of this Specification is to provide an
exception to LCO 3.0.2 [e.g., to not comply with the
applicable Required Action(s)]
to allow the performance of
required testing to demonstrate:
- a. The OPERABILITY of th e equipment being returned to service; or
- b. The OPERABILITY of other equipment.
The administrative controls ensure the time the equipment is
returned to service (in conflict with the requirements of
the ACTIONS) is limited to the time absolutely necessa ry to perform the required testing to demonstrate OPERABILITY.
This Specification does not provide time to perform any
other preventive or corrective maintenance.
LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-9 Revision 45 An example of demonstrating the OPERABILITY of the equipment being returned to service is reopening a containment
isolation valve that has been closed to comply with Required
Actions and must be reopened to perform the required
testing.
An example of demonstrating the OPERABILITY of other
equipment is taking an inoperable channel or trip sys tem out of the tripped condition to prevent the trip function from
occurring during the performance of required testing on
another channel in the other trip system. A similar example
of demonstrating the OPERABILITY of other equipment is
taking an inopera ble channel or trip system out of the
tripped condition to permit the logic to function and
indicate the appropriate response during the performance of
required testing on another channel in the same trip system.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) s taff has provided a Technical Specification interpretation for LCO 3.0.5 in a letter from D. V. Pickett (NRC) to G. H. Gellrich (CCNPP), dated December 20 , 2011. The NRC staff concluded that Technical Specification Required Actions 3.3.7.B.1, 3.3.8.A.1, 3
.4.11.A.1, 3.4.11.C.1, 3.7.3.A.1, and 3.7.8.A.1 are within the scope of the administrative controls applied by LCO 3.0.5 for the purpose of realignment of components needed for conducting the operability testing on equipment, so long as the testing could n ot be conducted while relying on the Technical Specification Required Actions. This includes repositioning of redundant or alternate equipment or trains previously manipulated to comply with the Technical Specification Required Action. The NRC staff furt her concluded that LCO 3.0.5 would apply in all cases to systems or components in Section 3 of the Technical Specifications.
LCO 3.0.6 Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.6 establishes an exception to LCO 3.0.2 for support systems that have an LCO
speci fied in the Technical Specifications. This exception
is provided because LCO 3.0.2 would require the Conditions
and Required Actions of the associated inoperable supported
system LCO to be entered solely due to the inoperability of
the support system. Th is exception is justified because the
actions required to ensure the unit is maintained in a safe LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-10 Revision 45 condition are specified in the support system LCO's Required Actions. These Required Actions may include entering the
supported system's Conditions and Requi red Actions or may
specify other Required Actions.
When a support system is inoperable and there is an LCO
specified for it in the Technical Specification, the
supported system(s) are required to be declared inoperable
if they are determined to be inoper able as a result of the
support system inoperability. However, it is not necessary
to enter into the supported systems' Conditions and Required
Actions unless directed to do so by the support system's
Required Actions. The potential confusion and inconsi stency of requirements related to the entry into multiple support
and supported systems' LCOs' and Required Actions are
eliminated by providing all the actions necessary to ensure
the unit is maintained in a safe condition in the support
system's Required Actions.
However, there are instances where a support system's
Required Action may either direct a supported system to be
declared inoperable or direct entry into Conditions and
Required Actions for the supported system. This may occur
immediately or af ter some specified delay to perform some
other Required Action. Regardless of whether it is
immediate or after some delay, when a support system's
Required Action directs a supported system to be declared
inoperable or directs entry into Conditions and Re quired Actions for a supported system, the applicable Conditions
and Required Actions shall be entered in accordance with
Specification 5.5.15, "Safety Function Determination Program (SFDP)," ensures loss of safety function is detected and
app ropriate actions are taken. Upon entry into LCO 3.0.6, an evaluation shall be made to determine if a loss of safety
function exists. Additionally, other limitations, remedial
actions, or compensatory actions may be identified as a
result of the support s ystem inoperability and corresponding
exception to entering supported system Conditions and
Required Actions. The SFDP implements the requirements of
LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-11 Revision 45 Cross-train checks to identify a loss of safety function for those support systems supportin g multiple and redundant
safety systems are required. The cross
-train check verifies
that the supported systems of the redundant OPERABLE support
system are OPERABLE, thereby ensuring safety function is
retained. A loss of safety function may exist when a
support system is inoperable, and:
- a. A required system redundant to system(s) supported by
the inoperable support system is also inoperable; or EXAMPLE B3.0.6
-1 If System 2 of Train A is inoperable, and System 5 of
Train B is inoperable, a loss of safety function
exists in supported System 5.
- b. A required system redundant to system(s) in turn
supported by the inoperable supported system is also
inoperable; or EXAMPLE B3.0.6
-2 If System 2 of Train A is inoperable, and System 11 of
Train B is i noperable, a loss of safety function
exists in System 11, which is in turn supported by
System 5. c. A required system redundant to support system(s) for
the supported systems (a) and (b) above is also
EXAMPLE B3.0.6
-3 If System 2 of Train A is inoperable, and System 1 of
Train B is inoperable, a loss of safety function
exists in Systems 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, and 11.
LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-12 Revision 45 TRAIN A TRAIN B System 8 System 8 System 4 System 4 System 9 System 9 System 2 System 2 System 10 System 10 System 5 System 5 System 11 System 11 System 1 System 1 System 12 System 12 System 6 System 6 System 13 System 13 System 3 System 3 System 14 System 14 System 7 System 7 System 15 System 15 If this evaluation determines that a loss of safety function exists, the appropriate Conditions and Required A ctions of
the LCO in which the loss of safety function exists are
required to be entered.
LCO 3.0.7 There are certain special tests and operations required to be performed at various times over the life of the unit.
These special tests and operations ar e necessary to
demonstrate select unit performance characteristics, to
perform special maintenance activities, and to perform
special evolutions. Special Test Exception (STE)
LCOs 3.1.7, 3.1.8, and 3.4.17 allow specific Technical
Specification requirement s to be changed to permit
performances of these special tests and operations, which
otherwise could not be performed if required to comply with
these Technical Specifications. Unless otherwise specified, all the other Technical Specification requirements remain unchanged. This will ensure all appropriate requirements of
the MODE, or other specified condition not directly
associated with or required to be changed to perform the
special test or operation, will remain in effect.
The Applicability of a STE LCO represents a condition not
necessarily in compliance with the normal requirements of LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-13 Revision 45 the Technical Specification. Compliance with STE LCOs is optional. A special operation may be performed either under
the provisions of the appropriate STE LCO or und er the other
applicable Technical Specification requirements. If it is
desired to perform the special operation under the
provisions of the STE LCO, the requirements of the STE LCO
shall be followed.
LCO 3.0.8 LCO 3.0.8 establishes conditions under whic h systems are considered to remain capable of performing their intended
safety function when associated seismic
-designated snubbers
are not capable of providing their associated support
function(s). This LCO states that the supported system is
not conside red to be inoperable solely due to one or more
snubbers not capable of performing their associated support
function(s). This is appropriate because a limited length
of time is allowed for maintenance, testing, or repair of
one or more snubbers not capable of performing their
associated support function(s) and appropriate compensatory
measures are specified in the snubber requirements, which are located outside of the Technical Specifications in the Technical Requirements Manual (TRM). The snubber
requirem ents do not meet the criteria in 10 CFR
50.36(d)(2)(ii), and, as such, are appropriate for control
by the TRM.
The allowances in this LCO apply only to seismic snubbers.
In adding the LCO to the Technical Specifications, the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) based their decision on
a risk analysis. That analysis considered an earthquake
-
induced loss
-of-offsite power and did not consider other
dynamic loading, such as waterhammer.
Therefore, the LCO is also applicable to snubbers that have the dual fun ction of seismic and other dynamic loading if the train is not
inoperable for any reason other than a lack of seismic support.
If the allowed time expires and the snubber(s) are unable to
perform their associated support function(s), the affected
supporte d system's LCO must be declared not met and the
Conditions and Required Actions entered in accordance with
LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-14 Revision 45 LCO 3.0.8.a applies when one or more snubbers are not capable of providing their associated support function(s) to
a single train or subs ystem of a multiple train or subsystem
supported system or to a single train or subsystem of a
single train system. The supported system must not be
inoperable for any reason other than a lack of seismic support. The LCO allows 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> to restore the sn ubber(s) before declaring the supported system inoperable.
The 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> Completion Time is reasonable based on the low
probability of a seismic event concurrent with an event that
would require operation of the supported system occurring
while the snubber(s) are not capable of performing their
associated support function and due to the availability of
the redundant train of the supported system.
LCO 3.0.8.b applies when one or more snubbers are not
capable of providing their associated support function(s) to more than one train or subsystem of a multiple train or
subsystem supported system. For example, if multiple
inoperable snubbers affect separate trains o f a system or
one inoperable snubber affects multiple trains o f a system, LCO 3.0.8.b is applicable. The supported system must not be
inoperable for any reason other than a lack of seismic support. The LCO allows 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> to restore the snubber(s)
before declaring the supported system inoperable. The
12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is reasonable based on the low probability of a seismic event concurrent with an event that
would require operation of the supported system occurring
while the snubber(s) are not capable of performing their
associated support function.
LCO 3.0.8 requires that risk be assessed and managed.
Industry and the NRC guidance on the implementation of
10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) (the Maintenance Rule) does not address
seismic risk. However, use of LCO 3.0.8 must be considered
with respect to other plant maintenance activities, and
integrated into the existing Maintenance Rule process to the
extent possible so that maintenance of any unaffected train
or subsystem is properly controlled, and emergent issues are
properly addressed. The risk assessment need not be
quantified, but may be a qualitative awareness of the
vulnerability of systems and components when one or more LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-15 Revision 45 snubbers are not able to perform their associated support function.
The NRC placed several conditions on the use of LCO 3.0.8:
- a. When LCO 3.0.8.a is used, one auxiliary feedwater (AFW) train not associated with the inoperable snubber must be available for core cooling
.
- b. When LCO 3.0.8.b is used, either one AFW train not associated with the inoperable snubber or some alternative means of cooling the core must be available (e.g., once-through core cooling
).
- c. When the provisions of LCO 3.0.8 are used, at least one
train of the supported system must be capable of
performing the required safety or support function(s)
for postulated loads other than seismic loads.
- d. A record of th e design function of the inoperable
snubber (i.e., seismic versus non
-seismic), the implementation of any of these conditions, and the
associated plant configuration shall all be available
on a recoverable basis for NRC inspection.
- e. When entering LCO 3.
0.8, risk must be assessed and
managed. The Maintenance Rule program complying with
10 CFR 50.65 (a)(4) satisfies this condition.
LCO 3.0.9 L CO 3.0.9 establishes conditions under which systems described in the Technical Specifications are considered to
r emain OPERABLE when required barriers are not capable of
providing their related support function(s).
Barriers are doors, walls, floor plugs, curbs, hatches, installed structures or components, or other devices, not
explicitly described in Technical Speci fications, that
support the performance of the safety function of systems
described in the Technical Specifications. This LCO states
that the supported system is not considered to be inoperable
solely due to required barriers not capable of performing
the ir related support function(s) under the described
conditions. LCO 3.0.9 allows 30 days before declaring the LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-16 Revision 45 supported system(s) inoperable and the LCO(s) associated with the supported system(s) not met. A maximum time is
placed on each use of this allow ance to ensure that as
required barriers are found or are otherwise made
unavailable, they are restored. However, the allowable
duration may be less than the specified maximum time based on the risk assessment.
If the allowed time expires and the barrier s are unable to
perform their related support function(s), the supported
system's LCO(s) must be declared not met and the Conditions
and Required Actions entered in accordance with LCO 3.0.2.
This provision does not apply to barriers which support
ventila tion systems or to fire barriers. The Technical
Specifications for ve nt i l ation systems provide specific
Conditions for inoperable barriers. Fire barriers are
addressed by other regulatory requirements and associated
plant programs. This provision does n ot apply to barriers
which are not required to support system OPERABILITY (see
NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2001
-09, "Control of Hazard
Barriers," dated April 2, 2001).
The provisions of LCO 3.0.9 are justified because of the low
risk associated with requ ired barriers not being capable of
performing their related support function. This provision
is based on consideration of the following initiating event
categories:
Loss of coolant accidents; High energy line breaks; Feedwater line breaks; Internal flood ing; External flooding; Turbine missile ejection; and Tornado or high wind.
The risk impact of the barriers which cannot perform their
related support function(s) must be addressed pursuant to
the risk assessment and management provision of the
Maintenanc e Rule, 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4), and the associated
implementation guidance
, Regulatory Guide 1.182, "Assessing
and Managing Risk Before Maintenance Activities at Nuclear LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-17 Revision 45 Power Plants."
Regulatory Guide 1.182 endorses the guidance in Section 11 of NUMARC 93-01 , "Industry Guideline for
Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power
Plants." This guidance provides for the consideration of dynamic plant configuration issues, emergent conditions, and
other aspects pertinent to plant operation with th e barriers
unable to perform their related support function(s). These
considerations may result in risk management and other
compensatory actions being required during the period that
barriers are unable to perform their related support function(s).
LCO 3.0.9 may be applied to one or more trains or subsystems
of a system supported by barriers that cannot provide thei r
related support function(s), provided that risk is assessed
and managed (including consideration of the effects on Large
Early Release and from external events).
If applied
concurrently to more than one train or subsystem of a
multiple train or subsystem supported system, the barriers
supporting each of these trains or subsystems must provide
their related support function(s) for different c ategories
of initiating events. For example, LCO 3.0.9 may be applied
for up to 30 days for more than one train of a multiple
train supported system if the affected barrier for one train
protects against internal flooding and the affected barrier
for the other train protects against tornado missiles. In
this example, the affected barrier may be the same physical
barrier but serve different protection functions for each
train.
If during the time that LCO 3.0.9 is being used, the
required OPERABLE train or subsystem becomes inoperable, it
must be restored to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
Otherwise, the train(s) or subsystem(s) supported by
barriers that cannot perform their related support function(s) must be declared inoperable and the associated
LCOs declared not met.
This 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> period provides time to
respond to emergent conditions that would otherwise likely
lead to entry into LCO 3.0.3 and a rapid plant shutdown, which is not justified given the low probability of an
initiating event which would require the barrier(s) not
capable of performing their related support function(s).
During this 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> period, the plant risk associated with LCO Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-18 Revision 45 the existing conditions is assessed and managed in accordance with 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4).
SR Applicability B 3.0 B 3.0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT (SR) APPLICABILITY BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-19 R evision 4 5 SRs Surveillance Requi rement 3.0.1 through SR 3.0.4 establish the general requirements applicable to all Specifications
and apply at all times, unless otherwise stated.
SR 3.0.1 Surveillance Requirement 3.0.1 establishes that SRs must be
met during the MODEs or other specified conditions in the
Applicability for which the requirements of the LCO apply, unless otherwise specified in the individual SRs. This
Specification is to ensure that surveillance tests are
performed to verify the OPERABILITY of systems and
components, and that variables are within specified limits.
Failure to meet a SR within the specified Frequency, in
accordance with SR 3.0.2, constitutes a failure to meet an
LCO.
Systems and components are assumed to be OPERABLE when the
associated SRs have been met.
Nothing in this
Specification, however, is to be construed as implying that
systems or components are OPERABLE when:
- a. The systems or components are known to be inoperable, although still meeting the SRs; or
- b. The requirements of the surveillance test(s) are known
to not be met between required surveillance test
performances.
Surveillance tests do not have to be performed when the unit
is in a MODE or other specified condition for which the
requirements of the associated LCO are not applicable, unless otherwise specified. The SRs associated with a STE
are only applicable when the STE is used as an allowable
exception to the requirements of a Specification.
Unplanned events may satisfy the requirements (including
applicable acceptance criteria) for a given SR. In this
case, the unplanned event may be credited as fulfilling the
performance of the SR. This allowance includes those SRs
whose performance is normally precluded in a given MODE or
other specified condition.
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-20 Revision 45 Surveillance tests, including surveillance tests invoked by Required Actions, do not have to be performed on inoperable
equipment, because the ACTIONS define the applicable
remedial measures. Surveillance tests have to be performed
in accordance with SR 3.0.2 prior to returning equipm ent to OPERABLE status.
Upon completion of maintenance, appropriate post
-maintenance
testing is required to declare equipment OPERABLE. This
includes ensuring applicable surveillance tests pass and
their most recent performance is in accordance with
SR 3.0.2. Post
-maintenance testing may not be possible in
the current MODE or other specified conditions in the
Applicability due to the necessary unit parameters not
having been established. In these situations, the equipment
may be considered OPERABLE pro vided testing has been
satisfactorily completed to the extent possible and the
equipment is not otherwise believed to be incapable of
performing its function. This will allow operation to
proceed to a MODE or other specified condition where other
necessar y post-maintenance tests can be completed.
Some examples of this process are:
- a. Auxiliary feedwater pump turbine maintenance during refueling that requires testing at steam pressures
> 800 psi. However, if other appropriate testing is
satisfactorily com pleted, the Auxiliary Feedwater
System can be considered OPERABLE. This allows startup
and other necessary testing to proceed until the plant
reaches the steam pressure required to perform the
testing. b. High pressure safety injection maintenance during
shutdown that requires system functional tests at a
specified pressure. Provided other appropriate testing
is satisfactorily completed, startup can proceed with
high pressure safety injection considered OPERABLE.
This allows operation to reach the speci fied pressure
to complete the necessary post
-maintenance testing.
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-21 Revision 45 SR 3.0.2 Surveillance Requirement 3.0.2 establishes the requirements for meeting the specified Frequency for surveillance tests
and any Required Action with a Completion Time that requires
the periodic performance of the Required Action on a "once
per . . ." interval.
Surveillance Requirement 3.0.2 permits a 25% extension of
the interval specified in the Frequency. This extension
facilitates surveillance test scheduling and considers plan t
operating conditions that may not be suitable for conducting
the surveillance test (e.g., transient conditions or other
ongoing surveillance test or maintenance activities).
The 25% extension does not significantly degrade the
reliability that results from performing the surveillance
test at its specified Frequency. This is based on the
recognition that the most probable result of any particular
surveillance test being performed is the verification of
conformance with the SRs. The exceptions to SR 3.0.2 are those surveillance tests for which the 25% extension of the
interval specified in the Frequency does not apply. These
exceptions are stated in the individual Specifications. An
example of where SR 3.0.2 does not apply is the Containment
Leakage Ra te Testing Program.
As stated in SR 3.0.2, the 25% extension also does not apply
to the initial portion of a periodic Completion Time that
requires performance on a "once per . . ." basis. The 25%
extension applies to each performance after the initial
performance. The initial performance of the Required
Action, whether it is a particular surveillance test or some
other remedial action, is considered a single action with a
single Completion Time. One reason for not allowing the 25%
extension to this Co mpletion Time is that such an action
usually verifies that no loss of function has occurred by
checking the status of redundant or diverse components or
accomplishes the function of the inoperable equipment in an
alternative manner.
The provisions of SR 3.0.2 are not intended to be used
repeatedly, merely as an operational convenience to extend
surveillance test intervals (other than those consistent SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-22 Revision 45 with refueling intervals) or periodic Completion Time intervals beyond those specified.
SR 3.0.3 Surveill ance Requirement 3.0.3 establishes the flexibility
to defer declaring affected equipment inoperable or an
affected variable outside the specified limits when a
surveillance test has not been completed within the
specified Frequency. A delay period of up t o 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or up
to the limit of the specified Frequency, whichever is
greater, applies from when it is discovered that the
surveillance test has not been performed in accordance with
SR 3.0.2, and not at the time that the specified Frequency
was not met.
A risk evaluation shall be performed for any Surveillance
delayed greater than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and the risk impact shall be
managed.
This delay period provides an adequate time to complete
missed surveillance tests. This delay period permits the completion of a surveillance test before complying with Required Actions or other remedial measures that might
preclude completion of the surveillance test.
The basis for this delay period includes consideration of
unit conditions, adequate planning, availability of
personnel, the time required to perform the surveillance
test, the safety significance of the delay in completing the
surveillance test, and the recognition that the most
probable result of any particular surveillance test being
performed is the verificati on of conformance with the
requirements.
When a Surveillance with a Frequency based not on time
intervals, but upon specified unit conditions, operating
situations, or requirements of regulations (e.g., prior to
entering MODE 1 after each fuel loading, o r in accordance
with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, as modified by approved
exemptions, etc.) is discovered to not have been performed
when specified, SR 3.0.3 allows for the full delay period of
up to the specified Frequency to perform the Surveillance.
How ever, since there is not a time interval specified, the SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-23 Revision 45 missed Surveillance should be performed at the first reasonable opportunity.
Surveillance Requirement 3.0.3 provides a time limit for, and allowances for the performance of, Surveillances that
becom e applicable as a consequence of MODE changes imposed
by Required Actions.
Failure to comply with specified Frequencies for SRs is
expected to be an infrequent occurrence. Use of the delay
period established by SR 3.0.3 is a flexibility that is not
inte nded to be used as an operational convenience to extend
surveillance test intervals.
While up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or the limit of the specified Frequency
is provided to perform the missed Surveillance, it is
expected that the missed Surveillance will be performe d at the first reasonable opportunity. The determination of the
first reasonable opportunity should include consideration of
the impact on plant risk (from delaying the Surveillance, as
well as any plant configuration changes required or shutting
the plan t down to perform the Surveillance) and impact on
any analysis assumptions, in addition to unit conditions, planning, availability of personnel, and the time required
to perform the Surveillance. This risk impact should be
managed through the program in p lace to implement
10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) and its implementation guidance, NRC
Regulatory Guide 1.182, "Assessing and Managing Risk Before
Maintenance Activities at Nuclear Power Plants." This
Regulatory Guide addresses consideration of temporary and
aggregate risk impacts, determination of risk management
action thresholds, and risk management action up to and
including plant shutdown. The missed Surveillance should be
treated as an emergent condition as discussed in the
Regulatory Guide. The risk evaluation may use quantitative, qualitative, or blended methods. The degree of depth and
rigor of the evaluation should be commensurate with the
importance of the component. Missed Surveillances for
important components should be analyzed quantitatively. If
the results of the risk evaluation determine the risk
increase is significant, this evaluation should be used to
determine the safest course of action. All missed SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-24 Revision 45 Surveillances will be placed in the licensee's Corrective Action Program.
If a surveillance te st is not completed within the allowed
delay period, the equipment is considered inoperable or the
variable is considered outside the specified limits, and the
Completion Times of the Required Actions for the applicable
LCO Conditions begin immediately upo n expiration of the
delay period. If a surveillance test fails within the delay
period, the equipment is inoperable or the variable is
outside the specified limits, and the Completion Times of
the Required Actions for the applicable LCO Conditions begin
i mmediately upon the failure of the surveillance test.
Completion of the surveillance test within the delay period
allowed by this Specification, or within the Completion Time
of the ACTIONS, restores compliance with SR 3.0.1.
SR 3.0.4 Surveillance Requi rement 3.0.4 establishes the requirement
that all applicable SRs must be met before entry into a MODE
or other specified Condition in the Applicability.
This Specification ensures system and component OPERABILITY
requirements and variable limits are met before entry into
MODEs or other specified conditions in the Applicability for
which these systems and components ensure safe operation of
the unit. The provisions of this Specification should not
be interpreted as endorsing the failure to exercise the go od practice of restoring systems or components to OPERABLE
status before entering an associated MODE or other specified
condition in the Applicability.
A provision is included to allow entry into a MODE or other
specified condition in the Applicability wh en an LCO is not
met due to Surveillance not being met in accordance with
However, in certain circumstances, failing to meet an SR
will not result in SR 3.0.4 restricting a MODE change or
other specified condition change. When a system, subsy
- stem, division, component, device, or variable is inoperable or
outside its specified limits, the associated SR(s) are not
required to be performed, per SR 3.0.1, which states that SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-25 Revision 45 Surveillances do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment. When eq uipment is inoperable, SR 3.0.4 does not
apply to the associated SR(s) since the requirement for the
SR(s) to be performed is removed. Therefore, failing to
perform the Surveillance(s) within the specified Frequency
does not result in an SR 3.0.4 restrict ion to changing MODES
or other specified conditions of the Applicability.
However, since the LCO is not met in this instance, LCO 3.0.4 will govern any restrictions that may (or may not)
apply to MODE or other specified condition changes.
Surveillance Re quirement 3.0.4 does not restrict changing
MODES or other specified conditions of the Applicability
when a Surveillance has not been performed within the
specified Frequency, provided the requirement to declare the
LCO not met has been delayed in accordanc e with SR 3.0.3.
The provisions of SR 3.0.4 shall not prevent entry into
MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability
that are required to comply with ACTIONS. In addition, the
provisions of SR 3.0.4 shall not prevent changes in MODES or
oth er specified conditions in the Applicability that result
from any unit shutdown. In this context, a unit shutdown is
defined as a change in MODE or other specified condition in
the Applicability associated with transitioning from MODE 1
to MODE 2, MODE 2 t o MODE 3, MODE 3 to MODE 4, and MODE 4 to
MODE 5.
The precise requirements for performance of SRs are
specified such that exceptions to SR 3.0.4 are not
necessary. The specific time frames and conditions
necessary for meeting the SRs are specified in th e
Frequency, in the Surveillance, or both. This allows
performance of Surveillances when the prerequisite
condition(s) specified in a Surveillance procedure require
entry into the MODE or other specified condition in the
Applicability of the associated LC O prior to the performance
or completion of a Surveillance. A Surveillance that could
not be performed until after entering the LCO's
Applicability, would have its Frequency specified such that
it is not "due" until the specific conditions needed are
met. Alternately, the Surveillance may be stated in the
form of a Note, as not required (to be met or performed)
until a particular event, condition, or time has been SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES CALVERT CLIFFS
- UNITS 1 & 2 B 3.0-26 Revision 45 reached. Further discussion of the specific formats of SRs' annotation is found in Section 1.4, Frequency.