ML17308A551

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:15, 26 April 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2016/09/08 Seabrook La - (External_Sender) Seabrook'S License Amendment
ML17308A551
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook 
Issue date: 09/08/2016
From:
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
References
17-953-02-LA-BD01
Download: ML17308A551 (3)


Text

1 SeabrookLANPEm Resource From:Debbie - Gmail <grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com>

Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 10:23 AM To: Poole, Justin

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: Re: Seabrook's License AmendmentHello Justin, What in the world does "when if/when" means -. when the amendment is submitted on the Fed Reg???

Debbie From: Poole, Justin tin.Poole@nrc.gov

Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 8:40 AM To: Deborah Grinnell Cc: Broaddus, Doug ; Bower, Fred

Subject:

RE: Re: Seabrook's License Amendment

Hello Debbie,

Which time frame are you referring to when you say "what is the justification for selecting the time frames proposed?"

Yes I will send you an email when if/when the amendment is published in the Federal Register. I say if because we are still doing our acceptance review of the document. The amendm ent would only get noticed in the Federal Register if we accept the document for review. For more information on the acceptance review, I have attached our publicly available office instruction on how the staff performs acceptance reviews for license amendments (and other licensing actions).

Justin C. Poole Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)415-2048 From: Deborah Grinnell [mailto:grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com

] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 5:35 PM To: Poole, Justin <

Justin.Poole@nrc.gov

>

Subject:

[External_Sender] Re: Seabrook's License Amendment

Are will you-sorry!

On Sep 7, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Deborah Grinnell <grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com

> wrote: Hello Justin,

2 We are reading the Seabrook License Amendment, we have a question. What is th e justification for selecting the time frames proposed? We you contact me asap when the SLA is submitted into

the Federal Reg on the day?

Thank you, Debbie Hearing Identifier: Seabrook_LA_NonPublic Email Number: 298 Mail Envelope Properties (000e01d209dc$8cc7b8c0$a6572a40$)

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: Re: Seabrook's License Amendment Sent Date: 9/8/2016 10:23:17 AM Received Date: 9/8/2016 10:23:27 AM From: Debbie - Gmail Created By: grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com Recipients: "Poole, Justin" <Justin.Poole@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None

Post Office: gmail.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1722 9/8/2016 10:23:27 AM

Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: