Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Condition
Printout selection
Options
Parameters [
limit:

The maximum number of results to return
offset:

The offset of the first result
link:

Show values as links
headers:

Display the headers/property names
mainlabel:

The label to give to the main page name
intro:

The text to display before the query results, if there are any
outro:

The text to display after the query results, if there are any
searchlabel:

Text for continuing the search
default:

The text to display if there are no query results
class:

An additional CSS class to set for the table
transpose:

Display table headers vertically and results horizontally
sep:

The separator between results
prefix:

Control display of namespace in printouts
Sort options
Delete
Add sorting condition
 Entered dateEvent description
ENS 524734 January 2017 16:03:00The following report was received via fax: We (New York State Department of Health) were informed on January 3, 2017 that on December 29, 2016, a 61 year old female patient was to receive SIR spheres Y90 infusion to 2 lesions in her liver at a hospital. The small lesion was to receive 10% and the large lesion was to receive 90% of 24.53 mCi Y90. Staff prepared 2 vials according to the Written Directive, and labeled each vial shield. When the first infusion, for the smaller lesion, was called for, a technologist took one vial to the IR room. She believed she had the correct 10% marked vial. She removed the top of the shielded container holding the vial, then she left the IR suite. The patient was injected. When the second infusion, for the large lesion, was called for, the same technologist took the second shielded vial from the hot lab and noticed that it was the one marked with the 10% label. It appears that the vials themselves were not labeled, only the lids of the containers holding the vials were labeled. Once they realized what had happened, they decided to infuse the second larger lesion with what was left over in the first vial as well as what was in the second vial. The licensee has not yet provided the values for the actual administered dose to each lesion. However, it appears clear that the discrepancy in the prescribed activity and administered activity for each lesion meets the reportable medical event criteria. (The licensee's) initial report stated there is no harm to the patient. A full report, including the actual activity delivered and a root cause analysis is required/pending. A Medical Event may indicate potential problems in a medical facility's use of radioactive materials. It does not necessarily result in harm to the patient.