ML21098A128

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:30, 15 April 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1D - Modeling Overview
ML21098A128
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/06/2021
From: Gabe Taylor
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
To:
Kenneth Hamburger
Shared Package
ML21098A124 List:
References
Download: ML21098A128 (7)


Text

Modeling Overview Gabriel Taylor, P.E.

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

Overview of ZOI development Current Duration Scenario Equipment Config.

Material Modeling + Fragility = ZOI Tables Incident Energy Target Vulnerability Zone of Influence (ZOI)

Heat Flux Threshold HEAF Research Working Group Update - April 6th, 2021 2

Flashback : April 2018 Merging with incorporation of CFD modeling insights HEAF Research Working Group Update - April 6th, 2021 3

Modeling Approaches

  • SNL SIERRA Suite

- Multi-physics coupled model

- Focus on modeling arc (source term)

- CFD modeling

- Focus on modeling thermal transport to target

  • Empirical

- Data fit

- Focus on specific phenomena; enclosure breach, arc voltage HEAF Research Working Group Update - April 6th, 2021 4

Modeling Scenarios

  • Medium Voltage, Non-segregated phase bus duct

Enclosure:

Steel or Aluminum

- Conductors: Aluminum or Copper

  • Medium Voltage Switchgear

- Configuration: Supply, Main, Load

- Energy Profile: Stiff, Decay, or Stiff + Decay

- Conductors: Aluminum or Copper

  • Low Voltage Switchgear

- Conductors: Aluminum or Copper HEAF Research Working Group Update - April 6th, 2021 5

Scenario Consolidation

  • PRA document covers over 300 scenarios for just aluminum
  • Low energy scenarios are being removed from initial list using empirical correlations and slightly conservative fragility thresholds
  • Reduces scenario list by 88%
  • Some scenarios have similar or identical hazard and can be consolidated even further HEAF Research Working Group Update - April 6th, 2021 6

Summary

  • Overall approach to decouple modeling and fragility efforts remains intact
  • Modeling approach has evolved into a hybrid between category and dynamic
  • PRA guidance document supports defining model scenarios
  • Modeling appears to provide reasonable estimates to inform the working groups ZOI determination. However, areas for uncertainty reduction exist.

HEAF Research Working Group Update - April 6th, 2021 7