ML19023A293

Conversation Record with DOE Idaho Op. Office Discuss Draft Request for Clarification of Responses to the Technical RAI on Three Mile Island, Unit 2 (TMI-2) ISFSI Renewal Application, Conv. Held on 01/22/19 (Dkt. 72-20, SNM-2508)

ML19023A293
Person / Time
Site:	07200020
Issue date:	01/22/2019
From:	Kristina Banovac Renewals and Materials Branch
To:	US Dept of Energy, Idaho Operations Office
References
CAC 000993, CAC 001028, EPID L-2017-LNE-0007, EPID L-2017-RNW-0019
Download: ML19023A293 (2)

Text

NRC FORM 699 .*" "'"<.,,_ U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE OF SIGNATURE (03-201 3) f~~

~J 01 /22/2019

"'* ...... " CONVERSATION RECORD NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU DATE OF CONTACT TYPE OF CONVERSATION DE-MAIL Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office 01 /22/2019 E-MAIL ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER 0 TELEPHONE D INCOMING

[Z) OUTGOING ORGANIZATION DOCKET NUMBER(S)

Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office 72-20 LICENSE NUMBER(S) CONTROL NUMBER(S)

SNM-2508 00 I 028/L-20l7-RNW-0019 and 000993/L-20 l 7-LNE-0007 SUBJECT Discuss draft request for clarification of responses to the technical request for additional information (RAJ) on Three Mile lsland, Unit 2 (TMl-2) Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) renewal application

SUMMARY

Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office (DOE-JD) attendees : Steven Wahnschaffe, Scott Ferrara, Steve Ahrendts, Brian Gutherman , Jeffery Long, Chris Backus, Sarah Gibboney NRC attendees : Kristina Banovac, Ricardo Torres, Mike Call , Caylee Kenny A teleconference was held between NRC and DOE-ID representatives to discuss the draft request for clarification of the technical RAJ responses (follow-up RAls) on the TMI-2 JSFSJ renewal application, which was provided to DOE-ID on January 16, 2019.

The purpose of the call was to : (I) ensure a common understanding of the follow-up RA Is; (2) ensure that the follow-up RA Is are not already addressed in the current submittal; (3) ensure the follow-up RA!s do not include proprietary information; and (4) identify an appropriate response date for DOE-ID to respond to the follow-up RA!s.

DOE-ID noted that it did not have any questions on the draft follow-up RAJs. DOE-ID noted that it will need until January 25 , 2019 to determine a response date and if there is any proprietary information in the draft follow-up RA!s .

Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)

DOE-ID will provide the response date to the NRC by January 25 , 2019.

DOE-ID will determine if there is any proprietary information in the draft follow-up RAls by January 25 , 2019.

NRC will issue the request for clarification letter to DOE-ID after receiving the response date from DOE-ID.

Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Kristina Banovac SIGNATURE

/ --..

---

*--*-

NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

Page 1 of 2

NRC FORM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (03-2013)

CONVERSATION RECORD (continued)

SUMMARY

(Continued from page 1)

DOE-ID also noted that it may submit a final revised version of the license renewal application (LRA, Rev. 2) with its response to the follow-up RAis. The NRC staff noted that it only needed the final version of the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR) supplement (provided in Appendix C of the LRA), including any referenced tables, as revised through DOE-ID 's response to the initial RA Is and follow-up RAls. DOE-ID noted that it will consider what is clearer for its recordkeeping in determining whether to submit a complete revised LRA wit_h the follow-up RAJ response.

NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

Page 2 of 2