ML12221A376
| ML12221A376 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 07/27/2012 |
| From: | NRC Region 4 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NRC-1798 | |
| Download: ML12221A376 (21) | |
Text
Official Transcript of Proceedings
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Title: Augmented Inspection Team Exit Meeting with Southern California Edison Company DVD 4/4
Docket Number: (n/a)
Location: San Juan Capistrano, California
Date: Monday, June 18, 2012
Work Order No.: NRC-1798 Pages 1-20
NEAL R. GROSS AND CO., INC. Court Reporters and Transcribers 1323 Rhode Island Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 234-4433
NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2 + + + + +
3 AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM EXIT MEETING WITH SOUTHERN 4 CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 5 + + + + +
6 MONDAY 7 JUNE 18, 2012 8 + + + + +
9 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA 10 DVD 4/4 11 + + + + +
12 The meeting convened in the Community Hall 13 at the San Juan Capistrano Community Center at 25925 14 Camino Del Avion, San Juan Capistrano, California, at 15 6:00 p.m., Richard Daniel, presiding.
16 NRC STAFF PRESENT:
17 RICHARD DANIEL, Facilitator 18 THOMAS BLOUNT 19 ELMO COLLINS 20 GEORGE CRAVER 21 EMMETT MURPHY 22 JOHN REYNOSO 23 JOEL RIVERA-ORTIZ 24 GREGORY WARNICK 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 2 PRESENT: (CONTINUED) 1 GREGORY WERNER 2 3 ALSO PRESENT:
4 PETER DIETRICH, Southern California Edison Co.
5 DOUGLAS BAUDER, Southern California Edison Co.
6 THOMAS PALMISANO, Southern California Edison Co.
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 3 P-R-O-C-E-E-D-I-N-G-S 1 (2:23 p.m.)
2 MR. WERNER: Actually, the steam 3 generators -- and Emmett might be able to help me 4 too -- the original steam generators had what they call 5 a square bend. The new steam generators have a U bend, 6 and so they are actually shaped like a U. The other 7 ones were more a square type arrangement.
8 As far as the whistle blower, I'm not aware 9 of -- you have to give me a little more details. I'm 10 not aware of a whistle blower.
11 PARTICIPANT: In the press a while back, 12 there was a whistle blower who came to light and I don't 13 know what he whistle blew. I'm wondering if those 14 concerns were generated in way on any of these issues?
15 MR. WERNER: I don't have any knowledge of 16 the individual that you're talking about or what the 17 concern was. I'm sorry.
18 MR. COLLINS: And I would add, by policy 19 and I think for good reason, when people bring us 20 concerns, we protect their identity in that process to 21 the maximum extent we can. And so if we did know of 22 it, I don't think I would be able to convey that to you 23 in a way that might connect it to -- and confirm that 24 someone had brought us concerns.
25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 4 MS. MAGDA: Thank you. I'm Marnie Magda 1 (phonetic) and I appreciate, Mr. Collins, you being 2 here, again. I did hear you last September. And that's 3 when I got the most frightened because you said 7.0 4 protection against earthquake was adequate.
5 So now that we look at this steam generator 6 problem and you're telling us that it's only guaranteed 7 at a 7.0 earthquake, and we look at the way in which 8 I hear the language sometimes "I think" or "It's my 9 understanding," and I remember Toni Iseman standing 10 there giving us a quote of a man who said, "These are 11 going to be the best. They will be wonderful." And 12 the response from one of you was "Well, that was before 13 my time." 14 So, my question is who is ultimately 15 accountable? Whose name goes on this forever that we 16 can all say, "This name, this person said that these 17 were safe," because there is not a person in this room 18 that has confidence in people with the nuclear 19 regulatory system or Edison. The language -- I already 20 knew when you said tube-to-tube, you were hiding 21 something. You do this to protect yourselves and I 22 guess to make us feel comfortable. None of us feel 23 comfortable.
24 We -- the latest concern of these steam 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 5generators -- not just an earthquake could ruin things.
1 We haven't even talked about firestorm that could come 2 through 140 homes in Laguna Beach, that every September, 3 we go against firestorms that could put all of the men 4 working and women working at San Onofre at stake.
5 And what if we have at the same time steam 6 generator pipes that start to crack? What are -- what 7 is your back up for all of these possible contingencies, 8 and who ends up -- whose name goes on this for the history 9 of the world if we go to Fukushima? Whose name is saying 10 this is safe?
11 FACILITATOR DANIEL: Thank you.
12 MR. COLLINS: There was a lot in your 13 question. I think we've already talked about seismic.
14 Size of the earthquake, I think, is translated in ground 15 motion at the site. That's what it's designed for.
16 We are requiring all licensees to reasses 17 that seismic hazard with the latest scientific 18 information that's available, and update it if 19 necessary. So, more work to be done on seismic to make 20 sure that we have a facility that's built the way it 21 needs to be built.
22 With respect to whose name goes on -- okay, 23 I licensed Southern California Edison. That is the name 24 on the license. They are the ones that primarily take 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 6the responsibility for safety, to make sure the 1 regulations are met, and to make sure that the facility 2 is operated as it is supposed to be operated.
3 And for this specific issue, you know, I'm 4 looking to make sure that when steam generators are 5 changed that it's done properly, and the design 6 objectives are met.
7 And so that's what -- that's my job as a 8 federal regulator, and we conduct inspection programs 9 and assessment programs to check that, to check that 10 along the way, so, within the law and within our 11 procedures and our guidelines.
12 But it's the name on the license that bears 13 the responsibility for safety. So --
14 FACILITATOR DANIEL: All right. Thank 15 you, Elmo. Charles has a question about the steam 16 generator.
17 MR. MURRAY: It's Charles Michael Murray 18 (phonetic) from Laguna Beach. Am I understanding that 19 the new generators that have gone in both reactor Unit 20 3 are unique, that there is one that is kind of similar 21 someplace else, but they are unique, and there isn't 22 anything identical on the planet that we can compare 23 and contrast to, so the situation is unique and we are 24 being exposed to this. Am I understanding this 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 7 correctly?
1 MR. WERNER: You're correct. These 2 generators are the only type of generators in the world.
3 There are similar generators at Palo Verde, Waterford, 4 ANO, Fort Calhoun, St. Lucie. But again, these specific 5 generators designed by Mitsubishi, these are unique 6 generators, here at -- yes, the size-wise.
7 MR. MURRAY: If that's the case, how did 8 they get approved to be placed in an environment with 9 eight million people?
10 MR. WERNER: Again, as we discussed earlier 11 they were -- they did go through the 50.59 review process 12 and we are still reviewing that process, but at this 13 time we have not identified anything that would have 14 required a License Amendment, other than those two items 15 I talked about earlier that did go through the License 16 Amendment review.
17 FACILITATOR DANIEL: Thank you Greg.
18 Gene. 19 MR. STONE: Residents Organized for a Safe 20 Environment would like to ask that before the plant is 21 restarted, that a cost analysis be done by the California 22 Public Utility Commission to determine whether it is 23 cost-effective for the citizens to have the plant 24 reopen, and within that investigation, it should be 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 8considered the twice-through cooling that is required 1 by state law, but both nuclear power plants in California 2 are only doing once-through cooling and have been given 3 a three-year extension because they say it is too 4 expensive to do.
5 But the law is -- and they have closed 6 coal-fired plants for this and gas-fired plants for this 7 once-through cooling, and why shouldn't California 8 Edison and this be considered into the cost benefit 9 analysis?
10 MR. COLLINS: If I understand your 11 question, it's about -- you requested that some 12 information be provided to the California Public 13 Utilities Commission and then the cost, the 14 implementation of the cooling that's employed.
15 I don't know if Pete or anyone from Edison 16 would want to tackle -- I'm not cognizant, the NRC does 17 not have purview over the interactions with the 18 California Public Utilities Commission. So I guess I'm 19 unable to be responsive to your request.
20 FACILITATOR DANIEL: All right, folks.
21 It's getting a little late and I promised one gentleman 22 that I would get back and let him finish, so I'm going 23 to do that. And I'm not done yet, okay?
24 MR. HEADRICK: Thank you very much.
25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 9 There's been some great questions asked tonight, much 1 more analytical. I tend to be more, just, going with 2 the analogy of the intervention. And so I thought it 3 was important and I just want to finish up my final 4 conclusion.
5 It has been mentioned a little bit tonight 6 and I know there's some questions, gray areas of 7 jurisdictions and stuff, but it's a real, human question 8 and I just want to finish my thought please.
9 It has been a rewarding game for some and 10 we are grateful, especially considering Japan's fate, 11 that we have not lost everything in one bad bet. Nature 12 holds the wild card where anything is possible. And 13 so far she has been kind to us.
14 We are here to tell you it is time to take 15 your winnings and go home. Don't even ask to place one 16 more bet. That would only confirm your gambling 17 disorder and codependent relationship.
18 This is the time for introspection and 19 reconciliation. We look forward to getting to a place 20 where everybody wins, embracing the future with a 21 healthy, renewed perspective. Thank you.
22 FACILITATOR DANIEL: Thank you, Gary.
23 (Applause) 24 FACILITATOR DANIEL: Folks we are going to 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 10take three more questions and then I'm going to ask that 1 you submit any remaining questions on those feedback 2 forms that I spoke of earlier. They are out in the lobby 3 on the table.
4 So, we are going to have three last 5 questions and we are going to wrap it up for the night.
6 Do you want to stand.
7 MS. CUMMINGS: My name is Tara Cummings 8 ***2:31:23 (notes have Coving but I think she says 9 Cummings, phonetic). I'm a pediatric nurse. One of 10 the things that has been in the news lately is that 11 because of new information about the external and 12 internal radiation exposures to children, the new 13 recommendations now are that they do not receive as many 14 or as intensive imaging because they found that they 15 have increased the amount of leukemia and brain tumors 16 in these children by seven times.
17 We have a number of children that live close 18 to San Onofre. There is a direct proportional increase 19 in risk for leukemia and other things and the amount 20 of time living near a nuclear reactor.
21 We have lots of different radiation 22 exposures that continue to fall upon us. Some are being 23 released by San Onofre. Some are coming over through 24 the jet stream from Fukushima. Some of it has been here 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 11 since the nuclear testing that went on in the '50s.
1 Who is adding up the total exposure for our 2 area? Some of these radioisotopes can stay lethal, 3 harmful for hundreds of thousands of years. Who is 4 adding up the total and measuring the total amount of 5 radiation exposure in our population and determining 6 what level of risk, and how are the new 7 information -- what were you guys calling it, the 8 learnings -- the new learnings about the true risks to 9 human life being implicated into the testing that's 10 being done and the regulations that are being used to 11 determine the risk assessment on this nuclear power 12 plant? 13 (Applause) 14 FACILITATOR DANIEL: Thank you Tara.
15 MR. WERNER: I share your concerns about 16 children with radiation. I have a six-year-old. And 17 actually, up until about a year and a half or two years 18 ago, I didn't realize how much radiation a CAT scan, 19 that's the study that you're talking about, I actually 20 heard that the other day.
21 For perspective, a CAT scan, a whole body 22 CAT scan, gets -- you get between 2,000 to 5,000 millirem 23 for each whole body CAT scan. And again, for a child 24 that has to be weighed, that's something you talk to 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 12the medical doctor to see if the benefit outweighs the 1 risk. You're absolutely correct. As compared to like 2 what the plant released last year, like I said, it was 3 around 0.1, 0.1 millirem versus 2,000 to 5,000 millirem.
4 I think as Greg indicated, naturally 5 occurring radiation is about 360 millirem, and then from 6 other sources about 600, 650 millirem per year.
7 MS. CUMMINGS: (Off-mic) 8 MR. WERNER: Again, those actually, those 9 -- the radiation was measured here along the coast, 10 again, very low levels. But yes, actually, it does all 11 add up. But again, still very low levels as compared 12 to, for instance, the CAT scan. They are talking, you 13 know, thousands of more times of radiation due to CAT 14 scans as what you get naturally.
15 MR. COLLINS: I'd like to add a few 16 thoughts. Your question about who adds it up, and who 17 takes a look at the total picture, I think it's well 18 established, I think, you know, and the NRC believes, 19 you know, there is no threshold linear relationship, 20 and any, any exposure to radiation has the prospect.
21 Now at the levels we're talking about, it 22 is practically negligible and incalculable. But there 23 are many other sources of radiation. For who, for 24 NRC-licensed material, which is the nuclear power plant 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 13and most medical uses, you know, cobalt therapies and 1 many of the diagnostic treatments, you know, we look 2 at those, look at those radiation exposures.
3 In terms of risk to people off-site at San 4 Onofre, we are engaged currently with the National 5 Academy of Sciences to propel another cancer study to 6 see what the data does show with respect to that.
7 The previous study did not show a 8 correlation of increased cancer with respect to exposure 9 from the nuclear power plant, but we are engaged again 10 to redo that study.
11 It's a very difficult study because when 12 you take a 0.1, perhaps, calculable dose and compare 13 that to two rem, five rem, you know, from CAT scans and 14 other radiation, how do you tease that out in the study.
15 And that's what the National Academy of Science is 16 struggling with that right now, how they are going to 17 do that and what data they are going to get.
18 So, we are serious about that and we want 19 to complete that study and get the best data we can.
20 So, we'll see where it goes.
21 MR. COLLINS: You're potentially referring 22 to the EPA radiation network -- potentially.
23 MS. CUMMINGS: (Off-mic) 24 FACILITATOR DANIEL: We wouldn't be in a 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 14 position to --
1 MR. COLLINS: I just don't have the 2 information on that, so --
3 FACILITATOR DANIEL: We are going to hear 4 from Lyn Harris-Hicks here.
5 MS. HARRIS-HICKS: I live two miles from 6 San Onofre. I have lived there for most of my life, 7 and my children and grandchildren are living in the 8 radiation that you put forth.
9 And we know that it has raised what they 10 call the natural background. There is no natural 11 background of radiation. It is a man-made poison. It 12 is the worst poison that we have every discovered how 13 to put out, to kill people.
14 And it is being used to kill people in the 15 countries overseas in the armaments. And we just can't 16 keep on doing this. And so when you sit there and talk 17 about -- you have to look a little more to see what 18 happened on this one or that one, and you don't have 19 any idea whether when you -- once you start it again, 20 that the next week it might be all over again in different 21 ones of those tubes, because the truth of it is that 22 the metals are the basic fault here, and that won't be 23 mentioned because that's the way the nuclear industry 24 has gotten all of its -- and I shouldn't say all, never 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 15say all -- the nuclear industry has gotten its 1 guarantees, loan guarantees, because without the loan 2 guarantees they couldn't build anything.
3 And they waited a generation. Oh now, I 4 mustn't get off on that. The point is that when you 5 know you have not been able to create an alloy which 6 can resist the terrible destructive action of this 7 terrible technology, why do you go ahead looking for 8 the little bits of fragments of what might have 9 influenced making it worse, or less worse, when our lives 10 are in the -- our lives, eight million, right of us --
11 and probably a lot more than that, because we are 12 learning every day about, from Fukushima, that that 13 radiation is coming over us and it is making more and 14 more people, and particularly the children -- how can 15 you do that? How can you look in the mirror and do that?
16 FACILITATOR DANIEL: Thank you, Ms. Hicks.
17 (Applause) 18 FACILITATOR DANIEL: Charles.
19 MR. COLLINS: Well, I'd like to just 20 comment. And you know, there is really probably nothing 21 I can say to say Ms. Hicks, you know, except I do 22 appreciate her sentiment and her challenge to us as the 23 Nuclear Regulatory Commission to make sure we do our 24 job with respect to safety.
25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 16 And on these particular issues, I'll just 1 tell you, we are committed to make sure that we 2 understand this, with the best science and engineering 3 that is available right now, and San Onofre is not going 4 to run again until we are satisfied. So, thank you for 5 your comment.
6 FACILITATOR DANIEL: All right. It's 7 going to be -- Elmo?
8 MR. COLLINS: Well, I'm just doing a time 9 check. We have to be out by 10.
10 FACILITATOR DANIEL: Okay. This is going 11 to be our final question. Charles.
12 MR. GRIFFIN: My name is Charles Griffin 13 (phonetic). I'd like to speak about the tubes. My wife 14 just passed away in December from lung cancer. Isn't 15 that interesting. Okay.
16 But about the tubes, and you've learned 17 tonight that this is a different design, and I've learned 18 tonight that it's quite a bit different design than what 19 was originally there.
20 And why didn't it trigger -- I initiated 21 the California Environmental Quality Act in 1970. It 22 was passed by Nixon and Governor Brown passed the 23 California Environmental Quality Act.
24 Why isn't there an Environmental Impact 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 17Statement for the National Environmental Protection 1 Act, and why haven't we got an Environmental Impact 2 Report for the tubes on this?
3 And because it involves looking for 4 alternatives, and certainly we have cheap, natural gas 5 and that's certainly a workable alternative, we just 6 built a natural gas facility at John Wayne Airport.
7 So, we can build local ones. We can put 8 them out in the desert. We don't have to cover our desert 9 with solar cells. But we also can build an alternative 10 utilizing hydrogen and boron and make a fusion reactor 11 there that's the size of a bathroom and you can put in 12 any substation and diversify this with a smart grid.
13 Thank you.
14 FACILITATOR DANIEL: Thank you, Charles.
15 MR. COLLINS: I want to make sure I 16 understand the question.
17 MR. GRIFFIN: We need an Environmental 18 Impact Report. Why haven't we got it?
19 MR. COLLINS: Yes, okay, good. Thank you.
20 Federal law tells us when the Environmental Impact 21 Statement --
22 MR. GRIFFIN: (Off-mic) 23 MR. COLLINS: I'm sorry. I stated that 24 poorly. That wasn't what I was trying to convey. First 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 18of all, Mr. Griffin, let me express my condolences on 1 the loss of your wife. I'm sorry to hear that.
2 But the licensee, I mean the NRC in the 3 implementation of our provisions, you know, has those 4 in our regulations about when an Environmental Impact 5 Statement should be triggered.
6 And we believe we followed those 7 regulations in this instance, but we also acknowledge 8 because of the prospect for a License Amendment which 9 might trigger additional reviews or additional federal 10 actions, and at least a statement of no significant 11 hazards determination.
12 We have got to go back and do our inspection 13 and review and make sure we got this one right. It's 14 actually a question we're asking ourselves, as well, 15 and we haven't arrived at the answer yet. So, thank 16 you. 17 FACILITATOR DANIEL: Ladies and gentlemen, 18 I'm sorry. The night is wearing long. Please give us 19 your questions on those feedback forms, but before you 20 go, I want to thank you for the thoughtful questions 21 and comments that you have all come out and asked.
22 And I want to thank you again for your time.
23 You have been a wonderful audience. Thank you very 24 much. And I am going to let Mr. Collins have the last 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 19 word here.
1 MR. COLLINS: Yes, I just want to -- Rick 2 already said what I wanted to say and that's my personal 3 appreciation for you taking the time to come out.
4 Your questions, we have done our best to 5 try to answer your question and be forthright with it.
6 And just to restate what we've indicated a number of 7 times, we're not satisfied yet. A lot of work has to 8 be done for this difficult technical issue.
9 We are going to have more meetings and we 10 are going to continue to talk about it before NRC makes 11 a decision. So I expect I am going to get to see you 12 again and we'll get to talk about this some more. So 13 thank you very much for your attendance tonight.
14 (Applause) 15 (Whereupon, at 2:44 p.m., DVD 4 ended, marking the end 16 of the meeting) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10