ML18032A480
| ML18032A480 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07201029 |
| Issue date: | 02/01/2018 |
| From: | Allen W C Spent Fuel Licensing Branch |
| To: | TN Americas LLC |
| Allen W C | |
| References | |
| Download: ML18032A480 (2) | |
Text
NRC FORM 699 /"'...,._11.
co3-2013i
!:\ti.I] i~/ U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION CONVERSATION RECORD ....... NAME OF PERSON(S)
CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU See below. E-MAIL ADDRESS ORGANIZATION 1N Americas, LLC (1N) LICENSE NUMBER(S)
SUBJECT Supplemental Information Request Teleconference
SUMMARY
DOCKET NUMBER(S) 72-1029 CONTROL NUMBER(S)
DATE OF CONTACT 01/22/2018 TELEPHONE NUMBER (888) 447-9153 DATE OF SIGNATURE J.-1-,t TYPE OF CONVERSATION
- DE-MAIL 0 TELEPHONE D INCOMING 0 OUTGOING 1N Americas, LLC participants:
Dennis Williford, Don Shaw, Prakash Narayanan, Venkat Venigalla, Rick Migliore, Eric Pernice, AhmedAbir NRC participants:
Chris Allen, JoAnn Ireland, Alexis Sotomayor-Rivera, Chris Bajwa and John Nguyen The call discussing the attached draft requests for supplemental information (RSis) began at approximately 1 P.M. When discussing RSI 4.1, 1N stated that they would provide justification that the temperatures provided in Tables A.4.11.2-4 and A.4.11.2-5 were bounding for the change requested in the amendment.
They also discussed the basis for their justification and indicated that the models would not require updating.
For RSI 4.2, 1N took some time to clarify that, for this portion of the amendment, they wanted to provide the user with the option of insuring adequate heat removal for the 24PT1 dry shielded container either using the previously approved temperature monitoring system or performing visual inspections of the storage module vents. After considering the information provided by 1N, staff questioned if the safety analysis report text provided with the application supported the temperature limit being reviewed.
1N indicated that they would clearly identify the information provided in the application which supported the requested change. 1N committed to providing calculations for RSI 5.1 which justified the dose rate limits proposed in the amendment as well as providing text in the safety analysis report discussing the dose rate limits. Finally, in discussing the thermal Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY) Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Chris Allen SIGNATURE NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)
Page 1 of 2 NRCFORM699 (03-2013)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION CONVERSATION RECORD (continued)
SUMMARY
- (Continued from page 1) observation, 1N discussed the boundary conditions utilized in their thermal models for the storage modules and committed to providing safety analysis report text which better described the boundary conditions associated with the storage module configurations.
When asked iflN would submit their responses within two weeks, 1N indicated that they needed to prioritize responding to this letter with other commitments and that they would provide the NRC a date by which they could submit their responses at a later time. The call concluded at approximately 1 :45 P .M. NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)
Page 2 of 2