ML20214J772
| ML20214J772 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000087 |
| Issue date: | 11/24/1986 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20214J754 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8612010451 | |
| Download: ML20214J772 (2) | |
Text
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _
/ o UNITED STATES E o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I ,$
{ WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
.....*)
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO FACILITY LICENSE NO. R-119 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION DOCKET NO. 50-87
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated August 11, 1986, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (WEC) submitted an application for amendments to their Physical Security Plany f Technical Specifications, and changes to their Safety Analysis Report L, (SAR). Thc :eview of the Physical Security Plan changes was transferred to Region III and reviewed under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(p). It was determined that the submitted changes do not decrease the effectiveness of the security plan and are therefore acceptable under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(p). Thus, no amendment to the license is required concerning the security plan changes.
The request for amendment to the Technical Specifications involves only the modification to the organization involved with the safe operation of the reactor. -
2.0 EVALUATION The proposed amendment adds a Radiation Safety Engineer to the organization facility staff. All other aspects of Section 7.1 remain the same as in the previous Amendment No. 8 issued November 1984. The changes to the WEC Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) also reflect the addition of a Radiation Safety Engineer to the organization. The new organizational chart in the FSAR is shown as Figure 5.1.2. There are no changes to other sections of the Technical Specifications.
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
This amenament involves administrative changes only. Accordingly, this amendmtnt forth in 10 CFR meets the elig(ibility 51.22(c) 10). Pursuantcriteria to 10 forCFR categorical 51.22(b),exclusi.a set no environ-mental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
I 8612010451 861124 7 l DR ADOCK 0500
i
4.0 CONCLUSION
The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) because the amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of accidents previously evaluated, or create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated, and does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety, the amendment does not involve a significant hazards consideration: (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by the proposed activities; and (3) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and the issuance of this
, amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or the the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor: Harold Bernard Dated: November 24, 1986 4
- - - -