ML092260123

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:31, 11 July 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2009 Wolf Creek Final Serf
ML092260123
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 08/06/2009
From:
Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:
Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
References
Download: ML092260123 (37)
v • d • e


Text

Wolf Creek Generating Station Exercise Report - 2009-06-03 Final Report - Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program 2009-08-06

Exercise Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Exercise Date: 2009-06-03 Report Date: 2009-08-06 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency REP Program 9221 Ward Parkway, Suite 300 Kansas City, MO 64114 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Executive Summary Chapter 2 Introduction Chapter 3 Exercise Overview Section 3.1 EPZ Description Section 3.2 Exercise Participants Section 3.3 Exercise Timeline Chapter 4 Exercise Evaluation and Results Section 4.1 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation Section 4.2 Status of Jurisdictions Evaluated 4.2.1 Kansas Jurisdictions 4.2.1.1 Kansas State Emergency Operations Center 4.2.1.2 Dose Assessment & Field Team Coordination 4.2.1.3 Kansas Radiological Monitoring Team # 2 - Blue 4.2.1.4 Kansas Radiological Monitoring Team # 1 - Green 4.2.1.5 Kansas Joint Information Center 4.2.1.6 Forward Staging Area 4.2.1.7 Kansas Emergency Operations Facility 4.2.1.8 EAS Station - WIBW 4.2.2 Risk Jurisdictions 4.2.2.1 Coffey County Emergency Operations Center 4.2.2.2 LeRoy USD 245 4.2.2.3 Coffey County Road and Bridge Department 4.2.3 Support Jurisdictions 4.2.3.1 Coffey County Decontamination Center 4.2.3.2 Lyon County Reception Center Appendices Appendix 1 - Acronyms and Abbreviations Appendix 2 - Exercise Evaluators and Team Leaders Appendix 3 - Exercise Evaluation Areas and Extent of Play Agreement Appendix 4 - Exercise Scenario and Timeline

1. Executive Summary On June 3, 2009, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Region VII, conducted an exercise in the plume emergency planning zone (EPZ) around the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station. In addition, out-of-sequence drills were conducted on May 20, 2009, and June 2, 2009.

The purpose of the exercise and drills was to assess the level of State and local preparedness in responding to a radiological emergency. These exercises and drills were held in accordance with FEMA's policies and guidance concerning the exercise of State and local radiological emergency response plans and procedures.

The previous exercise at this site was conducted on November 6-7, 2007. The qualifying emergency preparedness exercise was conducted on November 7, 1984.

FEMA wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the many individuals who participated in this exercise. In the State of Kansas, the risk county of Coffey and the host county of Lyon participated along with the various organizations of the State government. The efforts of the utility should also be commended for their work on the scenario development and exercise preparation.

Protecting the public health and safety is the full-time job of some of the exercise participants and an additionally assigned responsibility for others. Still others have willingly sought this responsibility by volunteering to provide vital emergency services to their communities. Cooperation and teamwork of all the participants were evident during this exercise.

The State and local organizations demonstrated knowledge of their emergency response plans and procedures and adequately implemented them. There were no Deficiencies, and no Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCAs) identified as a result of this exercise. Planning issues that were identified during the exercise will be forwarded under a separate correspondence. There were no Areas Requiring Corrective Action from the previous Exercise in 2007.

The final protective action decision (PAD) during the emergency phase was an evacuation of sub zones CTR, CCL, JRR, S-1, S-2, SW-1, and SW-2. This included Burlington Township, and the City of Burlington, the South quarter of Hampden Township, the Northeast and Northwest sides of Neosho Township, John Redmond 1

Reservoir, and Coffey County Lake. Approximately 3,082 residents in Kansas were affected by the evacuation.

2

2. Introduction On December 7, 1979, the President directed FEMA to assume lead responsibility for all offsite nuclear planning and response. FEMA's activities are conducted pursuant to 44 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 350, 351, and 352. These regulations are a key element in the Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program that was established following the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station accident in March 1979.

FEMA Rule 44 CFR 350 establishes the policies and procedures for FEMA's initial and continued approval of State and local governments' radiological emergency planning and preparedness for commercial nuclear power plants. This approval is contingent, in part, on State and local governments' participation in joint exercises with licensees.

FEMA's responsibilities in radiological emergency planning for fixed nuclear facilities include the following:

  • Taking the lead in offsite emergency planning and in the review and evaluation of radiological emergency response plans (RERP) and procedures developed by State and local governments.
  • Determining whether such plans and procedures can be implemented on the basis of evaluation of exercises of the plans and procedures conducted by State and local governments.
  • Responding to requests by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the NRC and FEMA (Federal Register, Vol. 58, No. 176, September 14, 1993).
  • Coordinating the activities of the following federal agencies with responsibilities in the radiological emergency planning process:

- U.S. Department of Commerce- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency- U.S. Department of Energy- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services- U.S. Food and Drug Administration 3

- U.S. Public Health Service- U.S. Department of Transportation- U.S. Department of Agriculture- U.S. Department of the Interior Representatives of these agencies serve as members of the FEMA Region VII Regional Assistance Committee (RAC), which is chaired by FEMA.

Formal submission of the RERPs for the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station to the RAC by the State of Kansas and involved local jurisdictions was followed by a critique and evaluation of these plans. Formal approval of the plans and the Alert and Notification System was granted by FEMA on April 4, 1989. A REP exercise was evaluated on June 3, 2009, by FEMA Region VII to assess the capabilities of State and local offsite emergency preparedness organizations in implementing their RERPs and procedures to protect the public health and safety during a radiological emergency involving the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

The purpose of this exercise report is to present the exercise results and findings on the performance of the offsite response organizations (OROs) during a simulated radiological emergency.

The findings presented in this report are based on the evaluations of the Federal evaluator team, with final determinations made by the FEMA Region VII RAC Chairperson and approved by the Regional Administrator.

The criteria utilized in the FEMA evaluation process are contained in:

  • NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants," November 1980.
  • Radiological Emergency Preparedness: Exercise Evaluation Methodology as published in the Federal Register on September 12, 2001, and April 25, 2002.

Chapter 3, of this report, entitled "Exercise Overview," presents basic information and data relevant to the exercise. This section of the report contains a description of the plume's EPZ, a listing of all participating jurisdictions and functional entities that were evaluated, and a tabular presentation of the time of actual occurrence of key exercise 4

events and activities.

Chapter 4, of this report, entitled "Exercise Evaluation and Results," presents basic information on the demonstration of applicable exercise criteria at each jurisdiction or functional entity evaluated in a jurisdiction-based, issues only format. This section also contains: (1) descriptions of all Deficiencies and ARCAs (if any) assessed during this exercise, recommended corrective actions, and the State and local governments' schedule of corrective actions for each identified exercise issue and (2) descriptions of ARCAs assessed during previous exercises and the status of the OROs efforts to resolve them.

5

3. Exercise Overview Contained in this section are data and basic information relevant to the June 3, 2009, Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station Exercise. This chapter of the exercise report includes a description of the plumes EPZ, a listing of all participating jurisdictions and functional entities that were evaluated, and a tabular presentation of the time of the actual occurrence of key exercise events and activities.

3.1. EPZ Description The Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station is located in the State of Kansas in Coffey County, about four miles northeast of Burlington, Kansas. The topography of the 10-mile or plume EPZ is relatively flat. The plume EPZ is divided into twenty-two sub zones containing a total population of 6,099 (2000 Census), all within Coffey County, Kansas.

With the exception of Burlington (population 2,790) and three other population clusters, the population density of the effective 10-mile EPZ is quite low - approximately 13 persons per square mile. Most of the seasonal or daily shifts in population are associated with recreational areas around John Redmond Reservoir and Coffey County Lake. Approximately 70% of the annual visitors to the John Redmond Reservoir and Coffey County Lake come to the area during the summer months. Sparsely populated farmland comprises the majority of the effective 10-mile EPZ. Other than the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station, there are not any large industries in the area.

3.2. Exercise Participants Agencies and organizations of the following jurisdictions participated in the Wolf Creek Generating Station exercise:

State Jurisdictions Adjutant General Kansas Division of Emergency Management Kansas National Guard Kansas Department of Health and Environment Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks Kansas Civil Air Patrol Kansas Department of Transportation 6

Kansas Department of Agriculture Kansas Air National Guard Kansas Department of Animal Health Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services Kansas Highway Patrol Kansas Department of Aging Kansas State Fire Marshal Kansas State Extension Service Risk Jurisdictions Coffey County Board of Commissioners Coffey County Attorney Coffey County Road and Bridge Coffey County Emergency Management Coordinator Coffey County Sheriff's Department Coffey County Treasurer Coffey County Fire Department Coffey County Radiological Officer Coffey County Health and Medical Department Coffey County Public Information Officer Coffey County Shelter Systems Officer Coffey County Hospital Coffey County Ambulance Coffey County Engineering Division LeRoy USD #245 Support Jurisdictions Emporia Fire Department Emporia Police Department Emporia State University Flint Hills Community Health Center Lyon County Emergency Management Lyon County Appraiser's Officer Lyon County Court Secretary's Office Lyon County Road and Bridge Lyon County Senior Patrol Lyon County Sheriff's Office Mental Health Center-East Central Kansas Region Private Jurisdictions 7

WIBW Radio Station Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation American Red Cross Salvation Army Federal Jurisdictions Department of Homeland Security / Federal Emergency Management Agency 3.3. Exercise Timeline Table 1, on the following pages presents the time at which key exercise events and activities occurred during the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station exercise held on June 3, 2009.

8 Table 1 - Exercise Timeline DATE: 2009-06-03, SITE: Wolf Creek Generating Station, KS Emergency Classification Level or Event Time Utility Declared Kansas State EOC Dose Assessment & Field Team Coordination Kansas Rad Monitoring Team # 2 - Blue Kansas Rad Monitoring Team # 1 - Green Kansas Joint Information Center Forward Staging Area Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0810 0820 0816----------------Site Area Emergency 0925 0938 0933 0938 0938 0940 0941 General Emergency 1049 1056 1059 1102 1102 1100 1104 Simulated Rad. Release Started 1047 1057 1047 1047 1047 1048 1104 Simulated Rad. Release Terminated

Facility Declared Operational 0913 0938 1006 1006 0848 0930 Governor Declared State of Emergency 0950 0951--------1035 0950 Exercise Terminated 1223 1221 1223 1223 1245 1223 Initial Protective Action: Precautionary Evacuation of JRR & CCL 0949 0951--------0945 0946 Initial Siren Activation

Initial EAS Message

Route Alerting for Ottumwa, Paper Flyers Completed (Siren Failed)

Notification of Hearing Impaired

1st Protective Action Decision: Precautionary Evacuation of Nursing Homes, Day Cares, Hospital Patients, and Jails in Sub Areas CTR, S

-1, S-2, SW-1, and SW-2 1006--------------------1st Siren Activation

1st EAS Message

Closing Airspace 1105--------------------2nd Protective Action Decision: Evacuation of CTR, S-1, S-2, SW-1, and SW-2 1107--------------------2nd Siren Activation

2nd EAS Message 1118--------------------KI to Emergency Workers in EPZ 1124 1122 1123 1123 1130 1127 3rd Protective Action Decision: Evacuation past 10-mile EPZ 1200--------------------3rd Siren Activation

3rd EAS Message 1211--------------------9 Table 1 - Exercise Timeline DATE: 2009-06-03, SITE: Wolf Creek Generating Station, KS Emergency Classification Level or Event Time Utility Declared Kansas Emergency Operations Facility EAS Station - WIBW Coffey County EOC Coffey County Road and Bridge Department Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0810 0815 0817 0821 0852 Site Area Emergency 0925 0933----0938 0943 General Emergency 1049 1059----1055 1110 Simulated Rad. Release Started 1047 1047----1054----Simulated Rad. Release Terminated

Facility Declared Operational 0938----0853----Governor Declared State of Emergency 0951----1031----Exercise Terminated 1221----1220 1220 Initial Protective Action: Precautionary Evacuation of JRR & CCL 0951 0949 0940 0947 Initial Siren Activation

0947----Initial EAS Message

0949 0949----Route Alerting for Ottumwa, Paper Flyers Completed (Siren Failed)

0950----Notification of Hearing Impaired

1005 1st Protective Action Decision: Precautionary Evacuation of Nursing Homes, Day Cares, Hospital Patients, and Jails in Sub Areas CTR, S-1, S-2, SW-1, and SW-2

1006----1st Siren Activation

1006----1st EAS Message

1018 1008----Closing Airspace

2nd Protective Action Decision: Evacuation of CTR, S-1, S-2, SW-1, and SW-2

1107----2nd Siren Activation

1118----2nd EAS Message

1123 1118----KI to Emergency Workers in EPZ 1122----1125 1125 3rd Protective Action Decision: Evacuation past 10-mile EPZ

1200----3rd Siren Activation

1208----3rd EAS Message

1209 1211----10

4. Exercise Evaluation and Results Contained in this section are the results and findings of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the Out-of-Sequence drills on May 20, 2009, and June 2, 2009, and the Fullscale Plume Exercise held on June 3, 2009, to test the offsite emergency response capabilities of State and local governments in the 10-mile plume EPZ surrounding the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

Each jurisdiction and functional entity was evaluated on the basis of its demonstration of the criteria delineated in Emergency Preparedness: Exercise Evaluation Methodology as printed in the Federal Register September 12, 2001 and April 25, 2002. Detailed information on the exercise criteria and the extent-of-play agreement for this exercise is found in Appendix 3 of this report.

4.1. Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation The matrix presented in Table 2, on the following pages presents the status of all exercise criteria, which were scheduled for demonstration during this exercise, at all participating jurisdictions and functional entities. Exercise criteria are listed by number and the demonstration status of those criteria is indicated by the use of the following letters: M - Met (No Deficiency or ARCAs assessed and no unresolved ARCAs from prior exercises)

D - Deficiency assessed A - Area(s) Requiring Corrective Action (ARCA) assessed and or unresolved ARCA(s) from prior exercise(s)

N - Not Demonstrated (Reason explained in sub-section B) 11 Table 2 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation DATE: 2009-06-03 SITE: Wolf Creek Generating Station, KS A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, M: Met, N: Not Demonstrated Kansas State EOC Dose Assessment & Field Team Coordination Kansas Rad Monitoring Team # 2 - Blue Kansas Rad Monitoring Team # 1 - Green Kansas Joint Information Center Forward Staging Area Kansas Emergency Operations Facility EAS Station - WIBW Coffey County EOC LeRoy USD 245 Coffey County Road and Bridge Department Coffey County Decontamination Center Lyon County Reception Center Emergency Operations Management Mobilization 1a1 M M M M M M MMM M M Facilities 1b1 Direction and Control 1c1 MM MMM M M Communications Equipment 1d1 M M M M M M MMM M M Equip & Supplies to support operations 1e1 M M M M M M MM M M M M Protective Action Decision Making Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2a1MM MMMRadiological Assessment and PARs 2b1 M MMDecisions for the Plume Phase -PADs 2b2 M MMMPADs for protection of special populations 2c1MRad Assessment and Decision making for the Ingestion Exposure Pathway 2d1 Rad Assessment and Decision making concerning Relocation, Reentry, and Return 2e1 Protective Action Implementation Implementation of emergency worker exposure control 3a1M M MM MM M M M M Implementation of KI decision 3b1M M MM MM M M MImplementation of protective actions for special populations - EOCs 3c1MMImplementation of protective actions for Schools 3c2M MImplementation of traffic and access control 3d1 MMMMImpediments to evacuation are identified and resolved 3d2 MMMMImplementation of ingestion pathway decisions - availability/use of info 3e1 Materials for Ingestion Pathway PADs are available 3e2 Implementation of relocation, re-entry, and return decisions.

3f1 Field Measurement and Analysis Adequate Equipment for Plume Phase Field Measurements 4a1M MField Teams obtain sufficient information 4a2MField Teams Manage Sample Collection Appropriately 4a3M MPost plume phase field measurements and sampling 4b1 Laboratory operations 4c1 Emergency Notification and Public Info Activation of the prompt alert and notification system 5a1 MM MActivation of the prompt alert and notification system - Fast Breaker 5a2 Activation of the prompt alert and notification system - Exception areas 5a3MEmergency information and instructions for the public and the media 5b1 MMM MSupport Operations/Facilities Mon / decon of evacuees and emergency workers, and registration of evacuees 6a1M M Mon / decon of emergency worker equipment 6b1M M 12 Temporary care of evacuees 6c1 Transportation and treatment of contaminated injured individuals 6d1 13 4.2. Status of Jurisdictions Evaluated This subsection provides information on the evaluation of each participating jurisdiction and functional entity, in a jurisdiction based, issues only format. Presented below is a definition of the terms used in this subsection relative to criteria demonstration status.

Met - Listing of the demonstrated exercise Criteria under which no Deficiencies or ARCAs were assessed during this exercise and under which no ARCAs assessed during prior exercises remain unresolved.

Deficiency - Listing of the demonstrated exercise Criteria under which one or more Deficiencies were assessed during this exercise. Included is a description of each Deficiency and recommended corrective actions.

Area Requiring Corrective Actions (ARCA) - Listing of the demonstrated exercise Criteria under which one or more ARCAs were assessed during the current exercise.

Included is a description of ARCA(s) assessed during this exercise and the recommended corrective action(s) to be demonstrated before or during the next biennial exercise. Not Demonstrated - Listing of exercise Criteria that were not demonstrated as scheduled during this exercise and the reason they were not demonstrated.

Prior ARCAs - Resolved - Description of ARCA(s) assessed during previous exercises that were resolved in this exercise and the corrective actions demonstrated.

Prior ARCAs - Unresolved - Description of ARCA(s) assessed during prior exercises that were not resolved in this exercise. Included is the reason the ARCA(s) remain unresolved and recommended corrective actions to be demonstrated before or during the next biennial exercise.

The following are definitions of the two types of exercise issues that are discussed in this report.

A Deficiency is defined by FEMA as "...an observed or identified inadequacy of organizational performance in an exercise that could cause a finding that offsite emergency preparedness is not adequate to provide reasonable assurance that 14 a.b.appropriate protective measures can be taken in the event of a radiological emergency to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of a nuclear power plant." An ARCA is defined by FEMA as "...an observed or identified inadequacy of organizational performance in an exercise that is not considered, by itself, to adversely impact public health and safety." FEMA has developed a standardized system for numbering exercise issues (Deficiencies and ARCAs). This system is used to achieve consistency in numbering exercise issues between FEMA Regions and site-specific exercise reports within each Region. It is also used to expedite tracking of exercise issues on a nationwide basis.

The identifying number for Deficiencies and ARCAs includes the following elements, with each element separated by a hyphen (-).

  • Plant Site Identifier - A two-digit number corresponding to the Utility Billable Plant Site Codes.
  • Exercise Year - The four digits of the year the exercise was conducted.
  • Criterion Number - A three-digit number corresponding to the criteria numbers in the FEMA Exercise Evaluation Areas.
  • Issue Classification Identifier - (D = Deficiency, A = ARCA). Only Deficiencies and ARCAs are included in exercise reports.
  • Drill or Exercise Issue Identification Number - A separate two (or three) digit indexing number assigned to each issue identified in the exercise.

4.2.1. Kansas Jurisdictions 4.2.1.1. Kansas State Emergency Operations Center MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.b.1, 2.b.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.1, 5.b.1.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None 15 c.d.e.f.a.b.c.d.e.f.a.b.c.d.e.f.a.b.c.d.e.f.DEFICIENCY: None NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 4.2.1.2. Dose Assessment & Field Team Coordination MET: 1.a.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.a.1, 2.b.1, 2.b.2, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 4.a.2.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None DEFICIENCY: None NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 4.2.1.3. Kansas Radiological Monitoring Team # 2 -

Blue MET: 1.a.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 4.a.1, 4.a.3.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None DEFICIENCY: None NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 4.2.1.4. Kansas Radiological Monitoring Team # 1 -

Green MET: 1.a.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 4.a.1, 4.a.3.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None DEFICIENCY: None NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 16 a.b.c.d.e.f.a.b.c.d.e.f.a.b.c.d.e.f.a.b.c.d.e.f.4.2.1.5. Kansas Joint Information Center MET: 1.a.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 5.b.1.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None DEFICIENCY: None NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 4.2.1.6. Forward Staging Area MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.a.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None DEFICIENCY: None NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 4.2.1.7. Kansas Emergency Operations Facility MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.a.1, 2.b.1, 2.b.2, 3.a.1, 3.b.1.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None DEFICIENCY: None NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 4.2.1.8. EAS Station - WIBW MET: 5.a.1, 5.b.1.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None DEFICIENCY: None NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 4.2.2. Risk Jurisdictions 17 a.b.c.d.e.f.a.b.c.d.e.f.a.b.c.d.e.f.a.b.c.4.2.2.1. Coffey County Emergency Operations Center MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.a.1, 2.b.2, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.1, 5.a.3, 5.b.1.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None DEFICIENCY: None NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 4.2.2.2. LeRoy USD 245 MET: 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None DEFICIENCY: None NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 4.2.2.3. Coffey County Road and Bridge Department MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.a.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None DEFICIENCY: None NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 4.2.3. Support Jurisdictions 4.2.3.1. Coffey County Decontamination Center MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 6.a.1, 6.b.1.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None DEFICIENCY: None 18 d.e.f.a.b.c.d.e.f.NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 4.2.3.2. Lyon County Reception Center MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 6.a.1, 6.b.1.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None DEFICIENCY: None NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 19 APPENDIX 1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ARCA Area Requiring Corrective Actions CCL Coffey County Lake CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security DRD Direct Reading Dosimeters EAS Emergency Alert System ECL Emergency Classification Level EMS Emergency Medical Services EOC Emergency Operations Center EOF Emergency Operations Facility EPZ Emergency Planning Zone ESU Emporia State University EW Emergency Worker FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FSA Forward Staging Area FT Field Team FTC Field Team Communicator GE General Emergency GPS Global Positioning System JIC Joint Information Center JRMT Joint Radiological Monitoring Team JRR John Redmond Reservoir KCPL Kansas City Power & Light KDEM Kansas Division of Emergency Management KDHE Kansas Department of Health & Enviroment KHP Kansas Highway Patrol KI Potassium Iodine KNG Kansas National Guard KSP Kansas State Patrol NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission ORO Offsite Response Organization OSL Optically Stimulated Luminescent OSLD Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeter PAD Protective Action Decision PIO Public Information Officer RAC Regional Assistance Committee REP Radiological Emergency Preparedness RERP Radiological Emergency Response Plan RO Radiological Officer SAE Site Area Emergency SEOC State Emergency Operations Center TDD Teletype Device For The Deaf TEDE Total Effective Dose Equivalent 20 USD Unified School District WCGS Wolf Creek Generating Station WCNGS Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station WCNOC Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation 21 APPENDIX 2 EXERCISE EVALUATORS AND TEAM LEADERS DATE: 2009-06-03, SITE: Wolf Creek Generating Station, KS LOCATION EVALUATOR AGENCY Kansas State Emergency Operations Center Michael Burriss Thomas Essig

  • David Smith ICF ICF FEMA VII Dose Assessment & Field Team Coordination
  • Marynette Herndon ICF Kansas Radiological Monitoring Team # 2 - Blue
  • Garianne Howard ICF Kansas Radiological Monitoring Team # 1 - Green
  • Chuck Hooper EPA Kansas Joint Information Center
  • Al Lookabaugh Wendy Swygert ICF ICF Forward Staging Area
  • Audie Canida FEMA VII Kansas Emergency Operations Facility
  • Richard Wessman ICF EAS Station - WIBW
  • Gary Bolender ICF Coffey County Emergency Operations Center Andrew Chancellor Carl McCoy
  • Joe Schulte FEMA VII ICF FEMA VII LeRoy USD 245
  • Gary Bolender ICF Coffey County Road and Bridge Department Alan Bevan
  • Rex Jennings ICF FEMA VII Coffey County Decontamination Center
  • Alan Bevan ICF Lyon County Reception Center Thomas Essig Marynette Herndon Garianne Howard
  • Sharron McDuffie ICF ICF ICF FEMA VII* Team Leader 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML092260123&oldid=1797375"