ML14143A037: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:OVERVIEW OF NRC'S LICENSE TERMINATIONRULETERMINATION RULEPresentation at the West Valley Quarterly Public Meeting May 28, 2014Robert L. Johnson1 REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE*Regulations:  10 CFR 20 Subpart E (License Termination gp(Rule (LTR))*Statements of Consideration (SOC) for LTR*Guidance:  Consolidated Decommissioning Guidance, NUREG-1757, Vol. 1, 2, and 3*Commission'sWestValleyPolicyStatement(WVPS)*Commissions West Valley Policy Statement (WVPS)*Commissions' Orders regarding ShieldalloyoCLI-11-12 and CLI-13-06oOnly for 10 CFR 20.1403(a)2 LTR STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS(SOC)CONSIDERATIONS (SOC)*Source of extensive information-rationale for provisions, ttresponses to comments*Commission preference for unrestricted release
{{#Wiki_filter:OVERVIEW OF NRC'S LICENSE TERMINATIONRULETERMINATION RULEPresentation at the West Valley Quarterly Public Meeting May 28, 2014 Robert L. Johnson 1
*Recognition that there may be cases where achieving unrestrictedreleasewouldnotbereasonable(egwherecostunrestricted release would not be reasonable (e.g., where cost would be excessive) *Flexibility -ConsistentsetofcriteriafortherangeoffacilitiesandsiteConsistent set of criteria for the range of facilities and site conditions-License termination approaches available:  unrestricted release, restricted release, alternate criteria Lidiiithdftid-Licensee proposes decommissioning methods for meeting dose criteria-NUREG-1757, Vol. 2, Rev.1, Section 23 GENERAL PROVISIONS, UNRESTRICTEDRELEASEUNRESTRICTED RELEASE*General provisions p-10 CFR 20.1401-1000 year compliance period -DOE/NYSERDAEISshouldanalyzebeyond1000yrDOE/NYSERDA EIS should analyze beyond 1000 yr(WVPS SOC)*Unrestricted release license termination10CFR201402-10 CFR 20.1402-25 mrem/yrand ALARA *Licensee could propose both unrestricted and pprestricted release for different portions of the site4 RESTRICTED RELEASE ELIGIBILITYELIGIBILITY*10 CFR 20.1403(a)()*Purpose-Initial eligibility for restricted release-not approvalScreenoutsitesthatshouldberemoving-Screen out sites that should be removing contamination to achieve unrestricted release*A site would be eligible if "- further reductions in residualradioactivitynecessarytocomplywiththeresidual radioactivity necessary to comply with the provisions of 20.1402 -would result in net public or environmental harm or-were not being made because the residual levels associated with restricted conditions are ALARA."5 RESTRICTED RELEASE ELIGIBILITY(CONT)ELIGIBILITY (CONT.)*Commissions' Orders regarding Shieldalloy-Series of Shieldalloylawsuits with associated Court and Commission actions-Explain original meaning of provision and clarifies the analysis is limitedtofurtherremovalofresidualradioactivitylimited to further removal of residual radioactivity-Not a comparison of individual doses of restricted and unrestricted release and selection of the lowest dose-Cost benefit analyses following NUREG-1757, Appendix N *Costs/benefits of further removal of residual radioactive materialfrom levels proposed to remain onsite to the unrestricted release level *Net public harm analysis (costs of harm to people and environment compared to benefits, e.g., collective dose averted dollar value)ALARA(totalcostscomparedtobenefitsegcollectiedoseaerted*ALARA (total costs compared to benefits, e.g., collective dose averted dollar value) 6 RESTRICTED RELEASE INSTITUTIONALCONTROLS(ICs)INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS (ICs)*10 CFR 20.1403 (b) ()*Guidance in NUREG-1757, Vol. 1, Rev. 2 *Legally enforceable ICs to restrict future site use*Durable ICs -For "higher risk" sites (100-500 mrem/yror > 100 yrhalf life -StateorFederalgovernmentownership/control-State or Federal government ownership/control*Five-year reviews
REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE*Regulations:  10 CFR 20 Sub part E (License Termination gp(Rule (LTR))*Statements of Consideration (SOC) for LTR*Guidance:  Consolidated Decommissioning Guidance, NUREG-1757, Vol. 1, 2, and 3
*Independent third party/government entity backupppygyp*NRC retains authority to take action if ICs fail (SOC)7 RESTRICTED RELEASE ENGINEEREDBARRIERS(EBs)ENGINEERED BARRIERS (EBs)*EBstomitigateEBs to mitigate-Human intrusion -Adverse natural processes (e.g., erosion) p(g)-Release and transport of radionuclides*Contribute to meeting dose criteria; no prescriptive LTR requirements *EBs are not ICs and are assumed to degrade rather than immediately and totally fail for the IC fail dose criteria8 RESTRICED RELEASE FINANCIAL ASSURANCEASSURANCE-10CFR20.1403(c)10 CFR 20.1403(c)-NUREG-1757, Vol. 3 -Purpose:enablesindependentthirdpartyPurpose:  enables independent third party, including a government custodian, to assume and carryout responsibilities for controls and ypmaintenance-Requirements for amounts and mechanisms (e.g., government entity statement of intent)9 RESTRICTED RELEASE ADVICE FROMAFFECTEDPARTIESFROM AFFECTED PARTIES*10CFR20.1403(d)10 CFR 20.1403 (d)*NUREG-1757 Vol. 1 *SeekadvicefromaffectedpartiesonspecificSeek advice from affected parties on specific questions*"incorporateasappropriate"incorporate as appropriate, *Provide a publicly available summary of discussions, and document advice in the dscussos,addocuetadcetedecommissioning plan10 RESTRICTED RELEASE DOSE CRITERIACRITERIA*10 CFR 20.1403 (b) and (e)()()*NUREG-1757, Vol. 2*ICs in effect:  25 mrem/yrplus ALARA *IfICsnolongerineffect("dosecaps")*If ICs no longer in effect (dose caps)oAssumption of immediate and total failureoALARAo100mrem/yroro100 mrem/yror o500 mrem/yrFurther reductions in residual radioactivity necessary to comply with 100 mrem/yrare "not technically achievable", prohibitively yy,pyexpensive, or would result in net public or environmental harmoIf ICs fail NRC retains authority to take action (SOC)11 RESTRICTED RELEASE ALTERNATECRITERIAALTERNATE CRITERIA*Alternate criteria license termination-10 CFR 20.1404-NUREG-1757, Vol. 1; Rev. 2
*Commission
-Alleviates the need for exemptions for exceeding doses listed below(SOC)below (SOC)-Exceed 25 mrem/yr(1402, 1403(b), 1403(d)(1)(i)(A))
'sWestValleyPolicyStatement(WVPS)
-Not to exceed 100 mrem/yrfrom all man-made sources-Restrictionsrequiredper1403;reducedosestoALARARestrictions required per 1403; reduce doses to ALARA-Commission approval after considering public and EPA comments*Exemptions-Consider granting exemptions -WVPS:  if LTR compliance is technically impractical or prohibitively expensive, but maintain protection12 NO LICENSE TERMINATION*Keep under licensep-SOC:  Alternative to license termination if requirements cannot be met WVPS:longtermorperpetuallicensewhereLTR-WVPS:  long-term or perpetual license where LTR requirements are technical impractical or prohibitively expensiveNUREG1757Vol1;Rev2Section177and-NUREG-1757, Vol. 1; Rev. 2, Section 17.7 and Appendix M*Possession only license for long-term control approved byCommissionby Commission*Last resort (e.g., if independent third party requirement is not met)13 RESTRICTED RELEASE CONCLUSIONCONCLUSION*AsystemofcontrolstoensuresafetyA system of controls to ensure safety-25 mrem/yrwith restrictions -Legally enforceable and durable ICs -EBs designed for site  
*Commissions West Valley Policy Statement (WVPS)*Commissions' Orders regarding Shieldalloy oCLI-11-12 and CLI-13-06 oOnly for 10 CFR 20.1403(a) 2 LTR STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS(SOC)CONSIDERATIONS (SOC)*Source of extensive information-rationale for provisions, ttresponses to comments*Commission preference for unrestricted release
-Monitoring and maintenance; 5-year rechecks-Independent third party/government backup to site owner/custodian-FinancialassuranceforthirdpartyFinancial assurance for third party-Dose "caps" if ICs fail:  "safety net"-Remain licensed, if needed 14}}
*Recognition that there may be cases where achieving unrestrictedreleasewouldnotbereasonable(egwherecost unrestricted release would not be reasonable (e.g., where cost would be excessive) *Flexibility  
-Consistentsetofcriteriafortherangeoffacilitiesandsite Consistent set of criteria for the range of facilities and site conditions-License termination approaches available:  unrestricted release, restricted release, alternate criteria Lidiiithdftid
-Licensee proposes decommissioning methods for meeting dose criteria-NUREG-1757, Vol. 2, Rev.1, Section 2 3
GENERAL PROVISIONS, UNRESTRICTEDRELEASE UNRESTRICTED RELEASE*General provisions p-10 CFR 20.1401-1000 year compliance period  
-DOE/NYSERDAEISshouldanalyzebeyond1000 yrDOE/NYSERDA EIS should analyze beyond 1000 yr(WVPS SOC)*Unrestricted release license termination10CFR201402
-10 CFR 20.1402-25 mrem/yrand ALARA *Licensee could propose both unrestricted and pprestricted release for different portions of the site4 RESTRICTED RELEASE ELIGIBILITY ELIGIBILITY*10 CFR 20.1403 (a)()*Purpose-Initial eligibility for restricted release-not approvalScreenoutsitesthatshouldberemoving
-Screen out sites that should be removing contamination to achieve unrestricted release*A site would be eligible if "- further reductions in residualradioactivitynecessarytocomplywiththe residual radioactivity necessary to comply with the provisions of 20.1402 -would result in net public or environmental harm or
-were not being made because the residual levels associated with restricted conditions are ALARA."
5 RESTRICTED RELEASE ELIGIBILITY(CONT)
ELIGIBILITY (CONT.)*Commissions' Orders regarding Shieldalloy
-Series of Shieldalloylawsuits with associated Court and Commission actions-Explain original meaning of provision and clarifies the analysis is limitedtofurtherremovalofresidualradioactivity limited to further removal of residual radioactivity-Not a comparison of individual doses of restricted and unrestricted release and selection of the lowest dose-Cost benefit analyses following NUREG-1757, Appendix N *Costs/benefits of further removal of residual radioactive material from levels proposed to remain onsite to the unrestricted release level *Net public harm analysis (costs of harm to people and environment compared to benefits, e.g., collective dose averted dollar value)ALARA(totalcostscomparedtobenefitsegcollectiedoseaerted
*ALARA (total costs compared to benefits, e.g., collective dose averted dollar value) 6 RESTRICTED RELEASE INSTITUTIONALCONTROLS(ICs)
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS (ICs)*10 CFR 20.1403 (b) ()*Guidance in NUREG-1757, Vol. 1, Rev. 2 *Legally enforceable ICs to restrict future site use*Durable ICs -For "higher risk" sites (100-500 mrem/yror > 100 yrhalf life  
-StateorFederalgovernment ownership/control
-State or Federal government ownership/control*Five-year reviews
*Independent third party/government entit y backupppygyp*NRC retains authority to take action if ICs fail (SOC) 7 RESTRICTED RELEASE ENGINEEREDBARRIERS(EBs)
ENGINEERED BARRIERS (EBs)*EBstomitigateEBs to mitigate-Human intrusion  
-Adverse natural processes (e.g., erosion
) p(g)-Release and transport of radionuclides*Contribute to meeting dose criteria; no prescriptive LTR requirements *EBs are not ICs and are assumed to degrade rather than immediately and totally fail for the IC fail dose criteria 8
RESTRICED RELEASE FINANCIAL ASSURANCE ASSURANCE
-10CFR20.1403(c) 10 CFR 20.1403(c)-NUREG-1757, Vol. 3  
-Purpose:enablesindependentthirdparty Purpose:  enables independent third party, including a government custodian, to assume  
 
and carryout responsibilities for controls and ypmaintenance-Requirements for amounts and mechanisms (e.g., government entity statement of intent) 9 RESTRICTED RELEASE ADVICE FROMAFFECTEDPARTIES FROM AFFECTED PARTIES*10CFR20.1403(d) 10 CFR 20.1403 (d)*NUREG-1757 Vol. 1  
*Seekadvicefromaffectedpartiesonspecific Seek advice from affected parties on specific questions
*"incorporateasappropriate "incorporate as appropriate
, *Provide a publicly available summary of discussions, and document advice in the dscussos,addocuetadcete decommissioning plan 10 RESTRICTED RELEASE DOSE CRITERIACRITERIA*10 CFR 20.1403 (b) and (e)()()*NUREG-1757, Vol. 2
*ICs in effect:  25 mrem/yrplus ALARA  
*IfICsnolongerineffect(
"dosecaps")*If ICs no longer in effect (dose caps)oAssumption of immediate and total failure oALARAo100mrem/yroro100 mrem/yror o500 mrem/yrFurther reductions in residual radioactivity necessary to comply with 100 mrem
/yrare "not technicall y achievable"
, prohibitivel y yy,pyexpensive, or would result in net public or environmental harm oIf ICs fail NRC retains authority to take action (SOC) 11 RESTRICTED RELEASE ALTERNATECRITERIAALTERNATE CRITERIA*Alternate criteria license termination
-10 CFR 20.1404-NUREG-1757, Vol. 1; Rev. 2
-Alleviates the need for exemptions for exceeding doses listed below(SOC) below (SOC)-Exceed 25 mrem/yr(1402, 1403(b), 1403(d)(1)(i)(A))
-Not to exceed 100 mrem/yrfrom all man-made sources
-Restrictionsrequiredper1403;reducedosestoALARA Restrictions required per 1403; reduce doses to ALARA-Commission approval after considering public and EPA comments*Exemptions
-Consider granting exemptions -WVPS:  if LTR compliance is technically impractical or prohibitively expensive, but maintain protection 12 NO LICENSE TERMINATION*Keep under license p-SOC:  Alternative to license termination if requirements cannot be met WVPS:longtermorperpetuallicensewhereLTR
-WVPS:  long-term or perpetual license where LTR requirements are technical impractical or  
 
prohibitively expensive NUREG1757Vol1;Rev2Section177and
-NUREG-1757, Vol. 1; Rev. 2, Section 17.7 and Appendix M*Possession only license for long-term control approved byCommission by Commission*Last resort (e.g., if independent third party requirement is not met) 13 RESTRICTED RELEASE CONCLUSION CONCLUSION
*Asystemofcontrolstoensuresafety A system of controls to ensure safety-25 mrem/yrwith restrictions -Legally enforceable and durable ICs -EBs designed for site  
-Monitoring and maintenance; 5-year rechecks
-Independent third party/government backup to site owner/custodian
-Financialassuranceforthirdparty Financial assurance for third party-Dose "caps" if ICs fail:  "safety net"
-Remain licensed, if needed 14}}

Revision as of 15:50, 1 July 2018

Overview of Nrc'S License Termination Rule
ML14143A037
Person / Time
Site: West Valley Demonstration Project, P00M-032
Issue date: 05/28/2014
From: Johnson R L
NRC/FSME/DWMEP/DURLD/SPB
To:
Shared Package
ML14143A059 List:
References
Download: ML14143A037 (14)


Text

OVERVIEW OF NRC'S LICENSE TERMINATIONRULETERMINATION RULEPresentation at the West Valley Quarterly Public Meeting May 28, 2014 Robert L. Johnson 1

REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE*Regulations: 10 CFR 20 Sub part E (License Termination gp(Rule (LTR))*Statements of Consideration (SOC) for LTR*Guidance: Consolidated Decommissioning Guidance, NUREG-1757, Vol. 1, 2, and 3

  • Commission

'sWestValleyPolicyStatement(WVPS)

  • Commissions West Valley Policy Statement (WVPS)*Commissions' Orders regarding Shieldalloy oCLI-11-12 and CLI-13-06 oOnly for 10 CFR 20.1403(a) 2 LTR STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS(SOC)CONSIDERATIONS (SOC)*Source of extensive information-rationale for provisions, ttresponses to comments*Commission preference for unrestricted release
  • Recognition that there may be cases where achieving unrestrictedreleasewouldnotbereasonable(egwherecost unrestricted release would not be reasonable (e.g., where cost would be excessive) *Flexibility

-Consistentsetofcriteriafortherangeoffacilitiesandsite Consistent set of criteria for the range of facilities and site conditions-License termination approaches available: unrestricted release, restricted release, alternate criteria Lidiiithdftid

-Licensee proposes decommissioning methods for meeting dose criteria-NUREG-1757, Vol. 2, Rev.1, Section 2 3

GENERAL PROVISIONS, UNRESTRICTEDRELEASE UNRESTRICTED RELEASE*General provisions p-10 CFR 20.1401-1000 year compliance period

-DOE/NYSERDAEISshouldanalyzebeyond1000 yrDOE/NYSERDA EIS should analyze beyond 1000 yr(WVPS SOC)*Unrestricted release license termination10CFR201402

-10 CFR 20.1402-25 mrem/yrand ALARA *Licensee could propose both unrestricted and pprestricted release for different portions of the site4 RESTRICTED RELEASE ELIGIBILITY ELIGIBILITY*10 CFR 20.1403 (a)()*Purpose-Initial eligibility for restricted release-not approvalScreenoutsitesthatshouldberemoving

-Screen out sites that should be removing contamination to achieve unrestricted release*A site would be eligible if "- further reductions in residualradioactivitynecessarytocomplywiththe residual radioactivity necessary to comply with the provisions of 20.1402 -would result in net public or environmental harm or

-were not being made because the residual levels associated with restricted conditions are ALARA."

5 RESTRICTED RELEASE ELIGIBILITY(CONT)

ELIGIBILITY (CONT.)*Commissions' Orders regarding Shieldalloy

-Series of Shieldalloylawsuits with associated Court and Commission actions-Explain original meaning of provision and clarifies the analysis is limitedtofurtherremovalofresidualradioactivity limited to further removal of residual radioactivity-Not a comparison of individual doses of restricted and unrestricted release and selection of the lowest dose-Cost benefit analyses following NUREG-1757, Appendix N *Costs/benefits of further removal of residual radioactive material from levels proposed to remain onsite to the unrestricted release level *Net public harm analysis (costs of harm to people and environment compared to benefits, e.g., collective dose averted dollar value)ALARA(totalcostscomparedtobenefitsegcollectiedoseaerted

  • ALARA (total costs compared to benefits, e.g., collective dose averted dollar value) 6 RESTRICTED RELEASE INSTITUTIONALCONTROLS(ICs)

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS (ICs)*10 CFR 20.1403 (b) ()*Guidance in NUREG-1757, Vol. 1, Rev. 2 *Legally enforceable ICs to restrict future site use*Durable ICs -For "higher risk" sites (100-500 mrem/yror > 100 yrhalf life

-StateorFederalgovernment ownership/control

-State or Federal government ownership/control*Five-year reviews

  • Independent third party/government entit y backupppygyp*NRC retains authority to take action if ICs fail (SOC) 7 RESTRICTED RELEASE ENGINEEREDBARRIERS(EBs)

ENGINEERED BARRIERS (EBs)*EBstomitigateEBs to mitigate-Human intrusion

-Adverse natural processes (e.g., erosion

) p(g)-Release and transport of radionuclides*Contribute to meeting dose criteria; no prescriptive LTR requirements *EBs are not ICs and are assumed to degrade rather than immediately and totally fail for the IC fail dose criteria 8

RESTRICED RELEASE FINANCIAL ASSURANCE ASSURANCE

-10CFR20.1403(c) 10 CFR 20.1403(c)-NUREG-1757, Vol. 3

-Purpose:enablesindependentthirdparty Purpose: enables independent third party, including a government custodian, to assume

and carryout responsibilities for controls and ypmaintenance-Requirements for amounts and mechanisms (e.g., government entity statement of intent) 9 RESTRICTED RELEASE ADVICE FROMAFFECTEDPARTIES FROM AFFECTED PARTIES*10CFR20.1403(d) 10 CFR 20.1403 (d)*NUREG-1757 Vol. 1

  • Seekadvicefromaffectedpartiesonspecific Seek advice from affected parties on specific questions
  • "incorporateasappropriate "incorporate as appropriate

, *Provide a publicly available summary of discussions, and document advice in the dscussos,addocuetadcete decommissioning plan 10 RESTRICTED RELEASE DOSE CRITERIACRITERIA*10 CFR 20.1403 (b) and (e)()()*NUREG-1757, Vol. 2

  • ICs in effect: 25 mrem/yrplus ALARA
  • IfICsnolongerineffect(

"dosecaps")*If ICs no longer in effect (dose caps)oAssumption of immediate and total failure oALARAo100mrem/yroro100 mrem/yror o500 mrem/yrFurther reductions in residual radioactivity necessary to comply with 100 mrem

/yrare "not technicall y achievable"

, prohibitivel y yy,pyexpensive, or would result in net public or environmental harm oIf ICs fail NRC retains authority to take action (SOC) 11 RESTRICTED RELEASE ALTERNATECRITERIAALTERNATE CRITERIA*Alternate criteria license termination

-10 CFR 20.1404-NUREG-1757, Vol. 1; Rev. 2

-Alleviates the need for exemptions for exceeding doses listed below(SOC) below (SOC)-Exceed 25 mrem/yr(1402, 1403(b), 1403(d)(1)(i)(A))

-Not to exceed 100 mrem/yrfrom all man-made sources

-Restrictionsrequiredper1403;reducedosestoALARA Restrictions required per 1403; reduce doses to ALARA-Commission approval after considering public and EPA comments*Exemptions

-Consider granting exemptions -WVPS: if LTR compliance is technically impractical or prohibitively expensive, but maintain protection 12 NO LICENSE TERMINATION*Keep under license p-SOC: Alternative to license termination if requirements cannot be met WVPS:longtermorperpetuallicensewhereLTR

-WVPS: long-term or perpetual license where LTR requirements are technical impractical or

prohibitively expensive NUREG1757Vol1;Rev2Section177and

-NUREG-1757, Vol. 1; Rev. 2, Section 17.7 and Appendix M*Possession only license for long-term control approved byCommission by Commission*Last resort (e.g., if independent third party requirement is not met) 13 RESTRICTED RELEASE CONCLUSION CONCLUSION

  • Asystemofcontrolstoensuresafety A system of controls to ensure safety-25 mrem/yrwith restrictions -Legally enforceable and durable ICs -EBs designed for site

-Monitoring and maintenance; 5-year rechecks

-Independent third party/government backup to site owner/custodian

-Financialassuranceforthirdparty Financial assurance for third party-Dose "caps" if ICs fail: "safety net"

-Remain licensed, if needed 14