|
|
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:}} | | {{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 27--J-(, As of: October 31, 2014Received: October 30, 2014Status: Pending_ PostPUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. ljy-8f80-rg6tComments Due: October 34Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2014-0207Biweekly Notice: Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined LicensesInvolving No Significant Hazards Considerations10,.2014Comment On: NRC-2014-0207-0001Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined LicensesHazards ConsiderationsDocument: NRC-2014-0207-DRAFT-0002Comment on FR Doc # 2014-23015No SignificantSubmitter InformationName: Michael KeeganAddress:P.O. Box 463Monroe, MI, 48161Email: mkeeganj @comcast.netSubmitter's Representative: Michael J. KeeganOrganization: Don't Waste MichiganGovernment Agency Type: StateGovernment Agency: NGO1710i-~wrn-~mO~)General Comment |
| | |
| | ==Dear NRC Docketing,== |
| | Don't Waste Michigan goes on record in opposition to the proposed Palisades, License Amendment Request toImplement 10 CFR 50.61 a, "Alternate Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PressurizedThermal Shock Events." dated 7/29/2014.Palisades is the most embrittled nuclear power plant in the nation. Palisades Entergy, LLC is currently operatingwith a chunk of metal stuck in the bottom of the reactor. The Palisades nuclear facility is compromised in amultitude of ways that are well known and yet, unaddressed by Utility and NRC and with work is deferred.To the best of our records, Palisades exceeded technical specification regarding Pressurized Thermal Shock in1981. Since that time standards have been pencil whipped 7 times by the NRC and methodologies have beenswitched out. Each time Palisades exceeds embrittlement / PTS standards, the NRC has rolled those standardshttps://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648190cd6f&for... 10/31/2014 Page 2 of 2back. The NRC oversight has been inadequate. If the Palisades reactor vessel fails due to PTS it will not be anaccident. It will be the probable outcome to a set of circumstances which the NRC has tolerated for decades atgreat peril to the public. The public has no confidence in the NRC knowing what they are doing. This hasbecome a jobs program for the NRC, perpetually kicking the proverbial can down the road with fingers crosseduntil it is time to retire. Stop twisting this Tiger by the tail.Don't Waste Michigan requests that the NRC not issue a License Amendment to Palisades Entergy LLC.Thank youMichael J. KeeganDon't Waste MichiganP.O. Box 463 Monroe, MI 48161mkeeganj @comcast.nethttps://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648190cd6f&for... 10/31/2014}} |
Revision as of 09:48, 26 June 2018
|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML23005A2082022-12-29029 December 2022
Comment (14) of B. Iris Potter on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Palisades Nuclear Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML23005A1982022-12-27027 December 2022
Comment (8) of Terry Lodge on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Palisades Nuclear Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML23005A1972022-12-27027 December 2022
Comment (7) of Kraig Schultz on Behalf of Schultz Engineering on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC, Palisades Nuclear Plant, Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML23005A2012022-12-27027 December 2022
Comment (9) of Kathryn Barnes on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Palisades Nuclear Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML23005A2022022-12-27027 December 2022
Comment (10) of Mark Muhich on Behalf of Sierra Club Nuclear Free Michigan on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC, Palisades Nuclear Plant, Post- Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML23005A2032022-12-27027 December 2022
Comment (11) of the Council on Intelligent Energy & Conservation Policy and Promoting Health & Sustainable Energy on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Palisades Nuclear Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML23005A2052022-12-27027 December 2022
Comment (12) of Michael J. Keegan on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Palisades Nuclear Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML23005A2062022-12-27027 December 2022
Comment (13) of Kevin Kamps on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Palisades Nuclear Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML23005A2102022-12-27027 December 2022
Comment (15) of Kay Cumbow and Victor Mcmnemy on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Palisades Nuclear Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML23005A2112022-12-27027 December 2022
Comment (16) of Terry J. Lodge on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Palisades Nuclear Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML23005A2132022-12-27027 December 2022
Comment (17) of Kevin Kamps on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Palisades Nuclear Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML23005A1932022-12-26026 December 2022
Comment (5) of Steve Smith on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Palisades Nuclear Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML23005A1952022-12-26026 December 2022
Comment (6) of Ryan Pickering on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Palisades Nuclear Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML22355A1482022-12-21021 December 2022
Comment (4) of Shawn Connors on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Palisades Nuclear Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML22355A1422022-12-20020 December 2022
Comment (2) from Karen Schaumann Re Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Palisades Nuclear Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML22355A1472022-12-20020 December 2022
Comment (3) of Matthew C on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Palisades Nuclear Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21069A0392021-03-0303 March 2021
Comment (173) of Kevin on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2
ML21041A1262021-02-0909 February 2021
Comment (4) of Cathy Sayre on Palisades Nuclear Plant and Big Rock Point Plant Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments
ML21040A2152021-02-0808 February 2021
Comment (2) of Stephen C. Brown on Palisade Nuclear Plant and Big Rock Point Plant Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments
ML21040A2172021-02-0808 February 2021
Comment (3) of Richard Barron on Palisades and Big Rock Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments
ML21040A2112021-02-0707 February 2021
Comment (1) of Mark Muhich on Palisade Nuclear Plant and Big Rock Point Plant Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments
ML16015A3272016-01-0707 January 2016
Comment (2) of Jan Boudart Regarding Guidance: Subsequent License Renewal
ML15139A0832015-05-12012 May 2015
Comment (10) of Kevin Kamps on Behalf of Beyond Nuclear Opposing Draft Guidance Regarding the Alternate Pressurized Thermal Shock Rule
ML15139A0822015-05-12012 May 2015
Comment (15) of Kevin Kamps on Behalf of Beyond Nuclear Opposing Draft Guidance Regarding the Alternate Pressurized Thermal Shock Rule
ML15139A0342015-05-12012 May 2015
Comment (12) of Kevin Kamps on Behalf of Beyond Nuclear Opposing Draft Guidance Regarding the Alternate Pressurized Thermal Shock Rule
ML15139A0332015-05-12012 May 2015
Comment (11) of Kevin Kamps on Behalf of Beyond Nuclear Opposing Draft Guidance Regarding the Alternate Pressurized Thermal Shock Rule
ML15139A0322015-05-12012 May 2015
Comment (9) of Kevin Kamps on Behalf of Beyond Nuclear Opposing Draft Guidance Regarding the Alternate Pressurized Thermal Shock Rule
ML15139A0302015-05-12012 May 2015
Comment (7) of Kevin Kamps on Behalf of Beyond Nuclear Opposing Draft Guidance Regarding the Alternate Pressurized Thermal Shock Rule
ML15139A0292015-05-12012 May 2015
Comment (6) of Kevin Kamps on Behalf of Beyond Nuclear Opposing Draft Guidance Regarding the Alternate Pressurized Thermal Shock Rule
ML14309A1912014-10-31031 October 2014
Comment (4) of Sandy Mccomb on Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations
ML14309A1922014-10-30030 October 2014
Comment (00002) of Michael Keegan on Behalf of Don'T Waste Michigan on Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations
ML0804203042008-01-21021 January 2008
Comment (1) of Tom Gurdziel Opposing the Inclusion of Vermont Yankee, Indian Point Unit 1, Indian Point Unit 2, and Indian Point Unit 3 in a Holding Company Owned by Entergy
ML0636204232006-12-12012 December 2006
Comment (1) of K. A. Westlake on Behalf of EPA Re Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plant, Supplement 27: Palisades, Final Report, NUREG-1437
ML0625500622006-09-0505 September 2006
Comment (22) of Kimon Kotos on Nrc'S Low-Level Radioactive Waste Program. Supports Position Submitted by Nirs and Recommends Not to Renew Palisades License Extension
ML0618600692006-06-22022 June 2006
Comment (16) of Terry J. Lodge Regarding Notice of Pertinent New Case Law Affecting Proceeding: Request for Redraft of EIS, Additional Comment Period, and for New Period for Receipt of Contentions on Terrorism
ML0619204802006-06-19019 June 2006
Comment (17) of Martha Macfarlane Faes, Re ER-05-249, Palisades Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal, Covert Township, Van Buren County (NRC)
ML0616401142006-05-26026 May 2006
Comment (14) of Kenneth A. Westlake on Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 27: Palisades Nuclear Plant, Van Buren County, Michigan, Draft Report, NUREG-1437
ML0615700222006-05-18018 May 2006
Comment (12) of Kevin Kamps on NUREG-1437, Supplement 27, Draft
ML0615700422006-05-18018 May 2006
Comment (10) of Various, on NUREG-1437, Supplement 27 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
ML0615700252006-05-15015 May 2006
Comment (13) of Michael T. Chezik for Renewing License for Palisades Nuclear Plant
ML0615700202006-05-15015 May 2006
Comment (11) of Terry and Laura O'Brien on NUREG-1437, Supplement 27 Re Opposition of the Renewal of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant License
ML0613705092006-05-15015 May 2006
Comment (8) of P. Harden Draft Supplement 27 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, NUREG 1437, for Palisades Nuclear Plant License Renewal
ML0613200362006-05-0101 May 2006
Comment (7) of Diane Byme, Re While for Safe, New, Nuclear Plants/Technology, Feels in Best Interest of Public for Safety Issues to Close Down Palisades and Not Renew License
ML0612402062006-04-23023 April 2006
Comment (6) of Marguerite Callaghan for Renewal of License for Palisades Nuclear Facility
ML0614601462006-04-19019 April 2006
Comment (9) of Morgan Dill, Opposing License Renewal of Palisades
ML0612100512006-04-10010 April 2006
Comment (3) of Paul C. French, Jr., Supporting Renewing License for Palisades Nuclear Generating Plant for Another 20 Years
ML0612100432006-04-0202 April 2006
Comment (5) of A. Hanson, Strongly Opposing the Proposed 20 Year License Extension at Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
ML0612100442006-04-0202 April 2006
Comment (4) of N. Hanson, Strongly Opposing the Proposed 20 Year License Extension at Palisades Nuclear Power Plant
ML0609000432006-03-20020 March 2006
Comment (1) of Ruben Dal Monte P.E., on NUREG 1437, Supplement 27 Draft, Re Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Palisades Nuclear Plant; Draft Report for Comments, Us NRC February 2006
ML0616502572006-02-23023 February 2006
Comment (15) of Connie & Jim Mcallister on Public Meeting to Discuss Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Palisades Nuclear Plant
2022-12-29
[Table view] |
Text
Page 1 of 27--J-(, As of: October 31, 2014Received: October 30, 2014Status: Pending_ PostPUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. ljy-8f80-rg6tComments Due: October 34Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2014-0207Biweekly Notice: Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined LicensesInvolving No Significant Hazards Considerations10,.2014Comment On: NRC-2014-0207-0001Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined LicensesHazards ConsiderationsDocument: NRC-2014-0207-DRAFT-0002Comment on FR Doc # 2014-23015No SignificantSubmitter InformationName: Michael KeeganAddress:P.O. Box 463Monroe, MI, 48161Email: mkeeganj @comcast.netSubmitter's Representative: Michael J. KeeganOrganization: Don't Waste MichiganGovernment Agency Type: StateGovernment Agency: NGO1710i-~wrn-~mO~)General Comment
Dear NRC Docketing,
Don't Waste Michigan goes on record in opposition to the proposed Palisades, License Amendment Request toImplement 10 CFR 50.61 a, "Alternate Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PressurizedThermal Shock Events." dated 7/29/2014.Palisades is the most embrittled nuclear power plant in the nation. Palisades Entergy, LLC is currently operatingwith a chunk of metal stuck in the bottom of the reactor. The Palisades nuclear facility is compromised in amultitude of ways that are well known and yet, unaddressed by Utility and NRC and with work is deferred.To the best of our records, Palisades exceeded technical specification regarding Pressurized Thermal Shock in1981. Since that time standards have been pencil whipped 7 times by the NRC and methodologies have beenswitched out. Each time Palisades exceeds embrittlement / PTS standards, the NRC has rolled those standardshttps://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648190cd6f&for... 10/31/2014 Page 2 of 2back. The NRC oversight has been inadequate. If the Palisades reactor vessel fails due to PTS it will not be anaccident. It will be the probable outcome to a set of circumstances which the NRC has tolerated for decades atgreat peril to the public. The public has no confidence in the NRC knowing what they are doing. This hasbecome a jobs program for the NRC, perpetually kicking the proverbial can down the road with fingers crosseduntil it is time to retire. Stop twisting this Tiger by the tail.Don't Waste Michigan requests that the NRC not issue a License Amendment to Palisades Entergy LLC.Thank youMichael J. KeeganDon't Waste MichiganP.O. Box 463 Monroe, MI 48161mkeeganj @comcast.nethttps://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648190cd6f&for... 10/31/2014
