ML022460380

Final Qa/Related Forms

ML022460380
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	08/20/2002
From:	Santiago M Entergy Nuclear Generation Co
To:	Conte R NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
Conte R
References
50-293/02301
Download: ML022460380 (20)

Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201 -1 Facility:

Date of Examination:

l Examinations Developed by:

Facility / NRC (circle one)

Target Chief Date*

Task Description I Reference Examiner's l

Initials

-180

1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a & b)

-120

2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

-120

3. Facility contact briefed on security & other requirements (C.2.c)

-120

4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

[-901

[5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c)]

A7

-75

6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.1.e & f; C.3.d)

-70

7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)

-45

8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g & h; C.3.d)

-30

9. Preliminary license applications due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)

-14

10. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)

-. 4

11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14

12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2f & h; C.3.g)

-7

13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7

14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204)

15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with

-7 facility licensee and authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k),

-7

16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[ ]

Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 22 of 24

ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 Quality Checklist Facility:

Date of Examination:

l Initials Item Task Description a

nbi c#

la W

c#l

1.

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401.

_Yt IW R

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with K

I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

V T

T

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

A

/

6 N

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

Z

2.

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of l normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

I

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M

mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity: ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)',

-l and scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3.

a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks.,

W (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination,

/or l

(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and T

(4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks.

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure.

(4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and i

(5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance-based activities.

A

d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of A applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days.

4.

a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the

-ZF -'

appropriate exam section.

E

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

E

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

/

3 R

A

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

lNY Inature Date

a. Author VIM2s

b. Facility Reviewer (A

c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) z4L.-

I D

d. NRC Supervisor 6'

B Note:

Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column 'c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

I I

I 23 of 24 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility:

fgri iM Date of Examination: 7/2 2 Operating Test Number:

Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA a

b*

C#

a.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with v

j W

sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

I Al

b.

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered

/

Ad during this examination.

l

c.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a).

ciI),

)

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable 4x, f

limits.

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent

/e applicants at the designated license level.

2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA l

a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b.

The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the criteria

/

]

in Attachment 1 of ES-301.

Cal

c.

Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within v

acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

l

d.

At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.

3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA

a.

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name/

gnat e

Date

a. Author Xtij V,.&tS l

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)

a zz

/

6

d. NRC Supervisor

/

' CM hi/g9/y NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

(a goeeA

44. £/( 4 Ft J/

f6zcn 4's 4A;/

v 6z 44"1 b~~il.

4:hS y/

r 4 /-

A-1i' d cz

^ ~ C devel Ace gA-,/

/flW ad Vl

'o4

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Uhecklist Form ES-301-4 Facility:

Date of Exam:

Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 Operating Test No.:

I QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of

_4 service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

Ati

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been v '

evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

12*

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit ff the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events A'

specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Actual Attributes TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D) 1 2

3

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 4

/

5

/

5 v --'

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1

/

1

/

i

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 3

/

3

/

3

-(--'

4.

Major transients (1-2) 1

/

1

/

1 k/o 7

5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2

/

3

/

2

_7

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0

/

1

/

1

,4 i

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 3

/

3

/

3

-/

K S NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 26

_ 1

rr

_ns0iA i-t n1 -4 ES- -<nA

%';iM11lzn~r. %rcnarno Quality U[eCtLrL Iu %1 I I I v

w ou I

W11u v

~

c d

8 J

Facility:

Date of Exam:

Scenario Numbers: 4 / 5 /

Operating Test No.:

1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of v

i service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) l the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

_l

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain A/

complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators a

have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are 6i-"

given.7

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

t

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been

.. Z levaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios._

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantiy modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

v

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events

-it.-

specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

/

Actual Attributes TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D) 4 5

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 4

/

4

/

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1

/ 1 /

)

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 3

/

2

/

A/

f

4.

Major transients (1-2) 1

/ 2

/

4/ Pt

5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 3

/

1

/

v4 L

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1

/

0

/

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 3

/

2

/

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 26

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

PreExamination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of /7 I as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have no been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of.7.2. k; From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

fr<ATC~/I) f-%A~

~

{E IATrC'lnTF PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY

1. ke/i VI/es S

yi Dcyc~cr

2. Sc an ff Jo //d

5.

_____1Ant

7. J1t-Ys Coin ag@^4 steer spc/s A'WC *(I 4s-7

,.,A a.

,4

8. f "0 it IR

(,Q}

A:AS~ _

9.

oA 4a

10.

AJC>2 aL /e

.11~.

AL

)v siod/Id

12. fr\\

O 3r1 en 1 3.

z za 1 4. p-V06ls

15.

hoN2 LEZ

-k) e CP AJClL7;~A., 7 P PIA (

! //I A-

<wooz fft-i k~'7 7L..44r SiIGNATIURE (1)

UAI t r-NX

~

t vlc~

4 2

~~~3-1-02 Ad-4>-

,^0 241of2V/4 24 of 24

-111, 01 dAL01f, NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

(

(

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of

-Z i*as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee s procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of _-Ei/-. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY S GNAT E (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATENOTE

1.

&JJC 1nfll)UA S6U!L!L,

&pqSA t_

2. W. '

I7X-,

13

.L.__

7.V7 kr\\\\s 6koea C~er~

H e

V-7hi 71wl

-X teEM

8.

12t tA 942d I d n T ES:l

14.

Ke,-(ve e-<< t<-<>f5t1 38-vl1o a

d 1

15. //JV.,T Al

-t t

iai 0).oensaE //O/

NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist OPERATING TEST NO.: 1 Rev. 1 SRO-1 Form ES-301-5 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number SRO SRO RO 1

2 3

4 Reactivity 1

Normal 1

RO Instrument /

4 Component Maior 1

Reactivity 1

2 Normal 0

As RO 3,

Instrument /

2 5, 8 Component Major 1

7 SRO-I Reactivity 0

2 2

Normal 1

1 1

Instrument I 2

3, 4, 3, 4, As SRO Component 5, 7 5, 6, Major 1

6 7

Reactivity 0

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument /

2 Component Major 1

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3)

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifi ble actions th t provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requi men t Instructions:

Author:

IRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: 1 Rev. 1 SRO-2 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number BOP RO SRO 1

2 3

4 Reactivity 1

Normal 1

RO Instrument!

Component 4

Maior 1

Reactivity 1

2 Normal 0

1 As RO Instrument 2

4, 7 3, 4 Component Major 1

6 7

SRO-I Reactivity 0

l l

L 2 Normal 1

1 Instrument 2

3, 4, As SRO Component 5, 6, 8

Major 1

7 Reactivity 0

=

=

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument!

2 Component Major 1

Instructions:

IU1)

(2)

(3)

Enter the operating test number and form LE-D-1 event numbers Tor each evolution type.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requireme Author:

AqRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-3011-5 ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: 1 Rev. 1 SRO-3 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number SRO SRO RO 1

2 3

4 Reactivity I

Normal 1

Instrument /

RO Component 4

Maoor1 Reactivity 1

2 Normal 0

1 As RO Instrument /

2 Component 3, 4 Major 1

6, 7 SRO-I Reactivity 0

2 2

1 1

Normal 1

Instrument 2

3, 4, 3, 4, As SRO Component 5, 7 5, 6, 8

Major 1

6 7

Reactivity 0

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

Instructions:

Author:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3)

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum require ent.

7/t1, "JRC Reviewer:

-r,-i
n+

nnri P:%ipnt C'hprkli.,;t Form ES-301-5 ES-301 I IOIIOIS1I1L t41-L-(',IDAI~t TI~Tn.

1 Rev. 1 SRO-4 M - l

-r Iu L..

c I

Applicant Type Evolution Type Minimum Number

'Scenanio Numbe, SRO RO 3

SRO 4

1 2

Reactivity 1

Normal 1

RO Instrument!

Component 4

M aior 1

Reactivity 1

2 Normal 0

_ l As RO Instrument 2

3, 5, Component 8

Major 1

7 SRO-I Reactivity 0

2 2

Normal 1

1 1

Instrument 2

3, 4, 3, 4, 5 As SRO Component 5, 6, Major 1

7 6,7 Reactivity 0

l l

Normal 1

l l

l l

SRO-U Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

l l

l l

Instructions:

Author:

(1 )

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3)

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirernnt. /

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301l Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: 1 Rev. 1 RO-1 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number RO BOP BOP 1

2 3

4 Reactivity 1

2 Normal 1

1 RO Instrument 4

3, 5 5, 6, 5

Component 8

Maior 1

6 7 =

6 Reactivity 1

Normal 0

As RO Instrument!

2 Component Major 1

SRO-I Reactivity 0

Normal 1

Instrument /

2 As SRO Component Major 1

Reactivity 0

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument!

2 Component Major 1

Instructions:

Author:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3)

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirernqt.,<

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist OPERATING TEST NO.: 1 Rev. 1 RO-2 Applicant Evolution Minimum Type Type Number Form ES-301-5 Scenario Number P

RO BOP 2

3 4

1 Reactivity 1

2 RO Normal Instrument /

Component 1

I 1

4 4,7 3,4 6

7 4, 6 Maior I

1 7

Instructions:

Author:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3)

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requireyXent.

/

NRC Reviewer:

-r,--;-,+

nnrl Pwant ('hPrk1i--;t Form ES-301-5 ES-301 OPERATING TEST NO.: 1 Rev. 1 RO-3 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scen ario Number Type Type Number RO BOP BOP 1

2 3

4 Reactivity 12 Normal 1

1 1

Instrument!

RO Component 4

3, 5 5, 6, 4, 6 8

Major 1

6 7

7 Reactivity 1

Normal 0

As RO Instrument /

2 Component Major 1

SRO-1 Reactivity 0

Normal 1

InstrumentI 2

As SRO Component Major Reactivity 0

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument!

2 Component Major I

Instructions:

Author:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3)

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requjemeny.

ARC Reviewer:

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Applicant #1 SRO 1 Applicant #2 SRO 2 SRO-I SRO-I Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SRO SRO RO BOP RO SRO 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 3,4,5 3,4,5,6 3,5,6 4,6,7 3,4,7 3,4,5,6 Understand and Interpret 7,8 7,8 Annunciators and Alarms 3,4,5,6 3,4,5,6 3,5,6 4,6,7 3,4,7 3,4,5,6 Diagnose Events 7

7,8 7,8 and Conditions 7

1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 2,3,5,6 4,6,7 2,3,4,7 1,2,3,4 Understand Plant 5,6,7 5,6,7,8 7,8 5,6,7,8 and System Response 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 2,3,5,7 1,4,6,7 2,3,4,7 1,2,3,4 Comply With and 5,6,7 5,6,7,8 8

5,6,7,8 Use Procedures (1) 2,3,5,7 1,4,6,7 2,3,4,7 Operate Control 8

Boards (2) 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 2,3,5,7 1,4,6,7 2,3,4,7 1,2,3,4 Communicate and 5,6,7 5,6,7,8 8

5,6,7,8 Interact With the Crew 2,3,4,5 2,3,5,6 1,3,4,5 Demonstrate Supervisory 6

7,8 6,7 Ability (3) 5 4

4 Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Revision 1 to PNPS submittal Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applic nt.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Applicant #3 SRO 3 Applicant #4 SRO 4 SRO-I SRO-I Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SRO SRO RO SRO RO SRO 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 3,4,5 3,4,5,6 3,4,6,7 3,4,5,6 3,5,6 3,4,5,6, Understand and Interpret 7,8 7,8 7

Annunciators and Alarms 3,4,5,6 3,4,5,6 3,4,6,7 3,4,5,6 3,5,6 3,4,5,6, Diagnose Events 7

7,8 7,8 7

and Conditions 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 2,3,5,6 1,2,3,4, Understand Plant 5,6,7 5,6,7,8 6,7 5,6,7,8 7,8 5,6,7 and System Response 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 2,3,5,7 1,2,3,4, Comply With and 5,6,7 5,6,7,8 6,7 5,6,7,8 8

5,6,7 Use Procedures (1) 1,2,3,4 2,3,5,7 Operate Control 6,7 8

Boards (2) 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 2,3,5,7 1,2,3,4, Communicate and 5,6,7 5,6,7,8 6,7 5,6,7,8 8

5,6,7 Interact With the Crew 2,3,4,5 1,3,4,5 2,3,5,6 2,4,6,7 Demonstrate Supervisory 6

6,7 7,8 Ability (3) 5 4

4 5

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) l Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Revision 1 to PNPS submittal Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will al every applicable competency for every app cant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

low the examiners to evaluate

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Applicant #5 SRO 5 Applicant #6 RO 1 SRO-I RO Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SRO SRO 905 RO BOP BOP 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 3,5,6 5,6,7,8 5,6,7 Understand and Interpret N/A N/A N/A N/A Annunciators and Alarms 3,5,6 5,6,7,8 5,6,7 Diagnose Events and Conditions 2,3,5,6 1,5,6,7 5,6,7 Understand Plant 8

and System Response 2,3,5,6 1,5,6,7 5,6,7 Comply With and 8

Use Procedures (1) 2,3,5,6 1,5,6,7 5,6,7 Operate Control 8

Boards (2) l 2,3,5,6 1,5,6,7 2,5,6,7 Communicate and 8

Interact With the Crew Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Revision 1 to PNPS submittal Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every ap ican Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Applicant #7 RO 2 Applicant #8 RO 3 RO RO Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO BOP RO BOP l

RO BOP BOP 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 4,6,7 3,4,7 4,6,7 3,5,6 5,6,7,8 4,6,7 Understand and Interpretl Annunciators and Alarms l

4,6,7 3,4,7 4,6,7 3,5,6 5,6,7,8 4,6,7 Diagnose Events and Conditions 4,6,7 2,3,4,7 1,4,6,7 2,3,5,6 1,5,6,7 1,4,6,7 Understand Plant 8

and System Response 1,4,6,7 2,3,4,7 1,4,6,7 2,3,5,6 1,5,6,7 1,4,6,7 Comply With and 8

Use Procedures (1) 1,4,6,7 2,3,4,7 1,4,6,7 2,3,5,6 1,5,6,7 1,4,6,7 Operate Control 8

Boards (2) 1,4,6,7 2,3,4,7 1,4,6,7 2,3,5,6 1,5,6,7 1,4,6,7 Communicate and 8

Interact With the Crew Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) l Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) l Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Revision 1 to PNPS submittal Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applic nt.

Author:

/

/

NRC Reviewer:

,7v

/g Z

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-7 I

Facility:

PNPS Date of Exam: 7/26/2002 Exam Level: RO Initial Item Description a

b*c-

1.

Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility

2.

a. NRC K/As referenced for all questionsto/

l

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as availablel

3.

RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate A per Section D.2.d of ES-401l

4.

Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process

5.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

-the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

_ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

_ the examinations were developed independently; or

_ the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or l

other (explain)

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual question 25 11 64 AS co distribution at right

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehension/analysis level; 44 56 Ho enter the actual question distribution at rightr

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers

9.

Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously w

approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines f-"

/

11.

The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and A/

S agrees with value on cover sheet Printed Nam / Sig ature Date

a. Author kL / H

)

V

&/

7

°2 l

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

jac.

do G, G_

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

/W UL-

%/

S II

d. NRC Regional Supervisor l

Note:

The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

PNPS Rev. I

ES-401 Written Examination r3i mlitv C'hecklist Form ES-401-7 E S-40 1

Written Examination Facility:

PNPS Date of Exam: 7/26/2002 Exam Level:

SRO Initial Item Description a

b*

c

1.

Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility X____

2.

a.

NRC K/A s

r eferenced f

or all questions lcn a

w

b. Facility leamina objectives referenced as available or

3.

RO/SRO overlap is no more th an 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401 Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears pcnsistent with a sys tematic sampling prcess new

5.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the a udit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or writhe audit exam was comp leted before the license exam was started; or e the examinations were developed independently; or 9 the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or arother (explain)

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New p

ercent from the bank at least 1a0 p erent new

,s and the rest modified); enter the actual question 25 6

69 AX e

ldistribution at right

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A 4

the exam (conting 100 new q ue st ions) are A/

written at the comprehension/analysis level; 41 59 enter the actual question distribution at right

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers g,

z-

9.

Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned1; deviaitions are justified

/

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B. guidelinesA/

11.

The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and<

agrees with value on cover sheet Printed Vlame Sig at re Date

a. Author

}<-l i/

12/6§ 4

4 ZG

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

5z<A Jtf S o S 7

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

>/717t-;&

,Z

/fT z/o 0

d. NRC Regional Supervisor T

Note:

• The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

PNPS Rev. I

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:

Date of Exam: 7/Z 41z Exam Level: ROISRO Initials Item Description a

b c

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

/>

w

/

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and A-'7W id/]

documented 4-A'

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors AJ/4 (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

K

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +1-2%) reviewed in

/LL k/4 detail__

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades

'/A V)4 19, are justified B

y

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants__________

Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Grader 1c/ >//-4,,

_b oll

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

/ 6/9

c. NRC Chief Examiner (L)

//

5 W

(3 L

d. NRC Supervisor 1*.T QCtIe

()

The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

I 5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1