ML042580010: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:RISK INFORMED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE (RITSTF)
{{#Wiki_filter:RISK INFORMED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE (RITSTF)
RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE               TITLE           INITIATIVE STATUS                           NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                             TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 1           Technical Specification
RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION INITIATIVE STATUS NEI RITSTF NEI Biff Bradley, 202 739-8083 WOG Jack Stringfellow, Southern Nuclear, 205 992-7037 CEOG Alan Hackerott, OPPD, 402 533-7276 Tony Pietrangelo, 202 739-8081 Jim Andrachek, Westinghouse, 412 374-5018 Gary Chung, SCE, 949 368-9431 EXCEL/
* Industry and NRC
TSTF Donald Hoffman, 301 984-4400 Jerry Andre, Westinghouse, 412 374-4723 Ray Schneider, CE, 860 731-6461 EPRI Frank Rahn, 650 855-2037 BWOG Paul Infanger, Progress Energy, 352-563-4796 BWROG Rick Hill, GE, 408 925-5388 John Gaertner, 704 547-6169 R. Schomaker, Framatome, 434 832-2917 Dusty Rhoads, Energy Northwest, 509 377-4298 Mike Kitlan, Duke, 980 373-8348 Don McCamy, TVA 256 729-4595 Page 1 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/
* NRC/Industry met 1/30/04 on TSTF 422 and             CEOG - TSTF-422 R0 Required Actions          developing implementation            TSTF 423. The NRC/RITSTF agreed to Preferred End States      guidance for TSTF-422 and            resolutions for all the NRC comments.                BWROG - TSTF-423 R0 TSTF-423.
RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 1
* A draft of the TSTF-422 implementation guidance       BWOG - TSTF-431 R0 document was provided to the NRC for comment in 6/04. NRC provided comments on 7/9/04 and a       WOG - TSTF-432 R0 revised document has been developed to address       (Not created) these comments. The document will be submitted to NRC by 9/20/04.
Technical Specification Required Actions Preferred End States Industry and NRC developing implementation guidance for TSTF-422 and TSTF-423.
* NRC will attempt to issue TSTF 422 Notice for Comment and Availability in 2004.
NRC/Industry met 1/30/04 on TSTF 422 and TSTF 423. The NRC/RITSTF agreed to resolutions for all the NRC comments.
* TSTF-423 was submitted to the NRC on 8/12/03.
A draft of the TSTF-422 implementation guidance document was provided to the NRC for comment in 6/04. NRC provided comments on 7/9/04 and a revised document has been developed to address these comments. The document will be submitted to NRC by 9/20/04.
* RITSTF provided draft responses to NRC comments on TSTF 423 at the 1/30/04 meeting.
NRC will attempt to issue TSTF 422 Notice for Comment and Availability in 2004.
* A draft of the TSTF-423 implementation guidance document was provided to the NRC on 7/20/04.
TSTF-423 was submitted to the NRC on 8/12/03.
RITSTF provided draft responses to NRC comments on TSTF 423 at the 1/30/04 meeting.
A draft of the TSTF-423 implementation guidance document was provided to the NRC on 7/20/04.
The NRC had not provided any comments before the 9/9/04 meeting.
The NRC had not provided any comments before the 9/9/04 meeting.
* The NRC wants more information in the BWROG TSTF 423 Implementation Guidance.
The NRC wants more information in the BWROG TSTF 423 Implementation Guidance.
* Based on review of the CEOG TSTF 422 Implementation Guidance, the NRC will provide the scope of additional information they want to BWROG.
Based on review of the CEOG TSTF 422 Implementation Guidance, the NRC will provide the scope of additional information they want to BWROG.
NEI RITSTF NEI      Biff Bradley, 202 739-8083            WOG Jack Stringfellow, Southern Nuclear, 205 992-7037          CEOG Alan Hackerott, OPPD, 402 533-7276 Tony Pietrangelo, 202 739-8081              Jim Andrachek, Westinghouse, 412 374-5018                    Gary Chung, SCE, 949 368-9431 EXCEL/
CEOG - TSTF-422 R0 BWROG - TSTF-423 R0 BWOG - TSTF-431 R0 WOG - TSTF-432 R0 (Not created)
TSTF     Donald Hoffman, 301 984-4400                Jerry Andre, Westinghouse, 412 374-4723                      Ray Schneider, CE, 860 731-6461 EPRI      Frank Rahn, 650 855-2037            BWOG Paul Infanger, Progress Energy, 352-563-4796            BWROG Rick Hill, GE, 408 925-5388 John Gaertner, 704 547-6169                  R. Schomaker, Framatome, 434 832-2917                        Dusty Rhoads, Energy Northwest, 509 377-4298 Mike Kitlan, Duke, 980 373-8348                              Don McCamy, TVA 256 729-4595 Page 1 of 2                                                                    9/09/2004


RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE         TITLE             INITIATIVE STATUS                         NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                         TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 1     Technical Specification
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS Page 2 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/
* Industry and NRC
RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 1
* BWOG Topical Report was submitted to NRC on     CEOG - TSTF-422 R0 Required Actions          developing implementation        1/19/04. The NRC provided an RAI on 6/29/04.
Technical Specification Required Actions Preferred End States Industry and NRC developing implementation guidance for TSTF-422 and TSTF-423.
Preferred End States      guidance for TSTF-422 and        BWOG informed the NRC they could not respond     BWROG - TSTF-423 R0 TSTF-423.                        to the RAI until early 2005, and the NRC has put review of the Topical Report on hold.           BWOG - TSTF-431 R0
BWOG Topical Report was submitted to NRC on 1/19/04. The NRC provided an RAI on 6/29/04.
* TSTF-431 has been distributed to the BWOG and   WOG - TSTF-432 R0 the RITSTF for review.                          (Not created)
BWOG informed the NRC they could not respond to the RAI until early 2005, and the NRC has put review of the Topical Report on hold.
Page 2 of 2                                                              9/09/2004
TSTF-431 has been distributed to the BWOG and the RITSTF for review.
CEOG - TSTF-422 R0 BWROG - TSTF-423 R0 BWOG - TSTF-431 R0 WOG - TSTF-432 R0 (Not created)


RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE         TITLE             INITIATIVE STATUS                         NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/     TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 2     Missed Surveillances
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS Page 3 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/
* TSTF-358, R6, has been
RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 2
* Initiative Complete.         TSTF-358 R6 SR 3.0.3                  approved and published for CLIIP adoption.
Missed Surveillances SR 3.0.3 TSTF-358, R6, has been approved and published for CLIIP adoption.
3    Increase Flexibility in
Initiative Complete.
* TSTF-359, R9, has been
TSTF-358 R6 3
* Initiative Complete.          TSTF-359 R9 Mode Restraints LCO        approved and published for 3.0.4                      CLIIP adoption.
Increase Flexibility in Mode Restraints LCO 3.0.4 TSTF-359, R9, has been approved and published for CLIIP adoption.
* The final Implementation Guidance, NEI-03-10, was issued on September 5, 2003.
The final Implementation Guidance, NEI-03-10, was issued on September 5, 2003.
4a   Individual Risk
Initiative Complete.
* Owners Groups (OGs) are
TSTF-359 R9 4a Individual Risk Informed Allowed Outage Times (AOTs)
* Ongoing.                     TSTF-373 R2 (CEOG)
Owners Groups (OGs) are pursuing generic Risk Informed AOT extensions through OG-specific Topicals and license amendments.
Informed Allowed          pursuing generic Risk Outage Times (AOTs)        Informed AOT extensions                                          TSTF-409 R1 (CEOG) through OG-specific Topicals and license                                            TSTF-417 R0 (WOG) amendments.
Ongoing.
TSTF-373 R2 (CEOG)
TSTF-409 R1 (CEOG)
TSTF-417 R0 (WOG)
TSTF-430 R0 (BWOG)
TSTF-430 R0 (BWOG)
TSTF-439 R1 (ALL OG)
TSTF-439 R1 (ALL OG)
TSTF-446 R0 (WOG)
TSTF-446 R0 (WOG)
TSTF-454 R0 (BWROG)
TSTF-454 R0 (BWROG)
Page 3 of 2                                          9/09/2004


RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE         TITLE             INITIATIVE STATUS                             NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                             TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 4b   Risk Informed AOTs   Hope Creek, Fort Calhoun,                                                                         TSTF-424 R0 With Configuration    South Texas Project, and Prairie
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS Page 4 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/
* RITSTF will develop a White Paper to address the Risk Management      Island have volunteered to                  interface of the a.4 process to the Initiative 4b and Program or            develop pilot submittals.                  Initiative 6 process to show the overlap and Maintenance Rule                                                  transition for ITS and non ITS plants and provide Backstop              Fort Calhoun and South Texas                to NRC in October 2004.
RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 4b Risk Informed AOTs With Configuration Risk Management Program or Maintenance Rule Backstop Hope Creek, Fort Calhoun, South Texas Project, and Prairie Island have volunteered to develop pilot submittals.
Project have submitted their pilots.
Fort Calhoun and South Texas Project have submitted their pilots.
* NRC provided 3 separate RAIs in 8/04 to NEI.
RITSTF will develop a White Paper to address the interface of the a.4 process to the Initiative 4b and Initiative 6 process to show the overlap and transition for ITS and non ITS plants and provide to NRC in October 2004.
* The RITSTF has created an Initiative 4b Subgroup to coordinate responses to the NRC RAIs.
NRC provided 3 separate RAIs in 8/04 to NEI.
* Current schedule is to provide responses to NRC and meet in 12/04.
The RITSTF has created an Initiative 4b Subgroup to coordinate responses to the NRC RAIs.
5a   Relocate Surveillance
Current schedule is to provide responses to NRC and meet in 12/04.
* Deterministic portion of
TSTF-424 R0 5a Relocate Surveillance Requirements Not Related to Safety Deterministic portion of Initiative 5 transferred to TSTF responsibility.
* TSTF reviewing candidate SRs to be relocated.        None assigned Requirements Not            Initiative 5 transferred to Related to Safety          TSTF responsibility.
TSTF reviewing candidate SRs to be relocated.
* TSTF will provide a TSTF to the NRC by 12/04.
TSTF will provide a TSTF to the NRC by 12/04.
5b   Relocate Surveillance
None assigned 5b Relocate Surveillance Test Intervals to Licensee Control RITSTF/BWROG/Pilot Plant will be applying the methodology and interfacing with the NRC on the issues in 2004.
* RITSTF/BWROG/Pilot                                                                         TSTF-425 R0 Test Intervals to          Plant will be applying the
NRC attended several Limerick IDP meetings to observe process.
* NRC attended several Limerick IDP meetings to Licensee Control            methodology and                       observe process.
The Limerick lead plant license amendment was submitted on June 11, 2004.
interfacing with the NRC on the issues in 2004.
TSTF-425 was submitted to the NRC on 8/31/04.
* The Limerick lead plant license amendment was submitted on June 11, 2004.
NEI is preparing the methodology document for submittal to the NRC in 09/04.
* TSTF-425 was submitted to the NRC on 8/31/04.
TSTF-425 R0
* NEI is preparing the methodology document for submittal to the NRC in 09/04.
Page 4 of 2                                                                  9/09/2004


RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE         TITLE           INITIATIVE STATUS                       NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                         TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 6a   Modify LCO 3.0.3
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS Page 5 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/
* On hold.
RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 6a Modify LCO 3.0.3 Actions and Timing 1 hour - 24 hours On hold.
* On hold for resolution of Initiative 6b and 6c to None assigned Actions and Timing 1                                        determine if Initiative 6a is required.
On hold for resolution of Initiative 6b and 6c to determine if Initiative 6a is required.
hour - 24 hours 6b   Provide Conditions in
None assigned 6b Provide Conditions in the LCOs for Those Levels of Degradation Where No Condition Currently Exists to Preclude Entry Into LCO 3.0.3 NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report on 7/9/04.
* NRC issued Safety
TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on 8/30/2004.
* CEOG submitted revised version of Topical        TSTF-426 R0 the LCOs for Those       Evaluation for Topical            Report to address NRC RAIs in 10/03.
CEOG submitted revised version of Topical Report to address NRC RAIs in 10/03.
Levels of Degradation     Report on 7/9/04.
NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report on 7/9/04.
Where No Condition
TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04.
* NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report Currently Exists to
RITSTF submit draft Implementation Guidance in 11/04.
* TSTF-426 R0 was                  on 7/9/04.
TSTF-426 R0 6c Provide Specific Times in the LCO For Those Conditions That Require Entry Into LCO 3.0.3 Immediately NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report on 7/9/04.
Preclude Entry Into      submitted to the NRC on LCO 3.0.3                8/30/2004.
TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on 8/30/2004.
* TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04.
CEOG submitted revised version of Topical Report to address NRC RAIs in 10/03.
* RITSTF submit draft Implementation Guidance in 11/04.
NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report on 7/9/04.
6c   Provide Specific Times
TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04.
* NRC issued Safety
RITSTF submit draft Implementation Guidance in 11/04.
* CEOG submitted revised version of Topical        TSTF-426 R0 in the LCO For Those     Evaluation for Topical            Report to address NRC RAIs in 10/03.
TSTF-426 R0
Conditions That           Report on 7/9/04.
Require Entry Into
* NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report LCO 3.0.3 Immediately
* TSTF-426 R0 was                   on 7/9/04.
submitted to the NRC on 8/30/2004.
* TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04.
* RITSTF submit draft Implementation Guidance in 11/04.
Page 5 of 2                                                              9/09/2004


RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE         TITLE             INITIATIVE STATUS                         NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                       TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 7a   Impact of Non
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS Page 6 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/
* TSTF-372, Rev. 4
RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 7a Impact of Non Technical Specification Design Features on Operability Requirements - Barriers TSTF-372, Rev. 4 submitted on 4/23/04.
* Draft Revision 4 of TSTF-372 created on 2/24/03. TSTF-372 R4 Technical Specification    submitted on 4/23/04.            NRC reviewed and agreed it addressed their Design Features on                                          comments. TSTF-372, Rev. 4 submitted to NRC     TSTF-427 R0 Operability
TSTF-427 submitted on 3/4/03.
* TSTF-427 submitted on              on 4/23/04.
NRC provided comments on TSTF-427 on 6/26/03.
Requirements - Barriers  3/4/03.
Draft Revision 4 of TSTF-372 created on 2/24/03.
* On 5/28/04, the NRC requested additional
NRC reviewed and agreed it addressed their comments. TSTF-372, Rev. 4 submitted to NRC on 4/23/04.
* NRC provided comments            information to support review of TSTF-372. The on TSTF-427 on 6/26/03.          TSTF/RITSTF responded on 6/7/04.
On 5/28/04, the NRC requested additional information to support review of TSTF-372. The TSTF/RITSTF responded on 6/7/04.
* NRC requested additional information in 7/04 and Industry/NEI responded with responses 9/7/04.
NRC requested additional information in 7/04 and Industry/NEI responded with responses 9/7/04.
* NRC plans FRN for Comment for TSTF 372 by 10/04.
NRC plans FRN for Comment for TSTF 372 by 10/04.
* NRC provided feedback on RITSTF responses on TSTF 427 in February 2004.
NRC provided feedback on RITSTF responses on TSTF 427 in February 2004.
* TSTF/RITSTF will delete the additions to the definition of OPERABILITY for TSTF 427 to address NRC concerns.
TSTF/RITSTF will delete the additions to the definition of OPERABILITY for TSTF 427 to address NRC concerns.
* TSTF-427 implementation guidance being developed and will be provided to the NRC by 09/17/04.
TSTF-427 implementation guidance being developed and will be provided to the NRC by 09/17/04.
* TSTF/RITSTF will provide a revision to TSTF-427 after completion of the implementation guidance document.
TSTF/RITSTF will provide a revision to TSTF-427 after completion of the implementation guidance document.
Page 6 of 2                                                            9/09/2004
TSTF-372 R4 TSTF-427 R0


RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE         TITLE         INITIATIVE STATUS                           NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                           TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 7b   Impact of Non TS
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS Page 7 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/
* A White Paper on the
RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 7b Impact of Non TS Design Features on Operability Requirements - All other SSCs not in Technical Specifications A White Paper on the process to address this scope of SSCs is being developed.
* RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the   None assigned Design Features on    process to address this scope        process to address this scope of SSCs by 10/04.
RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the process to address this scope of SSCs by 10/04.
Operability            of SSCs is being developed.
RITSTF/TSTF reviewed and has commented on the revised Operability guidance that will supersede the guidance distributed with GL 91-18.
Requirements - All
RITSTF/TSTF will develop a TSTF and submit to NRC by 12/04.
* RITSTF/TSTF reviewed and has commented on other SSCs not in                                            the revised Operability guidance that will Technical                                                    supersede the guidance distributed with GL 91-18.
None assigned 8a Remove or Relocate Systems LCOs That Do Not Meet the 4 Criterion of 10 CFR 50.36 From Technical Specifications A White Paper on the application of the 10 CFR 50.36 criteria is being developed.
Specifications
NEI 00-04 is being reviewed and will serve as the basis for Criterion 4 application.
* RITSTF/TSTF will develop a TSTF and submit to NRC by 12/04.
RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the guidance and methodology based on NEI 00-04 for the application of the four criteria of 10 CFR 50.36 and a list of the systems identified for relocation. RITSTF working on the schedule -
8a   Remove or Relocate
* A White Paper on the
* NEI 00-04 is being reviewed and will serve as the None assigned Systems LCOs That Do    application of the 10 CFR            basis for Criterion 4 application.
Not Meet the 4          50.36 criteria is being Criterion of 10 CFR    developed.
* RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the 50.36 From Technical                                        guidance and methodology based on NEI 00-04 Specifications                                              for the application of the four criteria of 10 CFR 50.36 and a list of the systems identified for relocation. RITSTF working on the schedule -
current plans are fourth quarter 2004.
current plans are fourth quarter 2004.
Page 7 of 2                                                                9/09/2004
None assigned


RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE                 TITLE           INITIATIVE STATUS                   NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                           TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 8b           Modify 50.36 Rule to
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS Page 8 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/
* Requires Rulemaking
RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 8b Modify 50.36 Rule to Permit Removal or Relocation of Non Risk Significant Systems out of Technical Specifications Requires Rulemaking RITSTF looking at coordinating Initiative 8b with longer term initiatives given the requirements for rulemaking.
* RITSTF looking at coordinating Initiative 8b with Not applicable Permit Removal or                                        longer term initiatives given the requirements for Relocation of Non Risk                                  rulemaking.
Approach favored by NEI and NRC is making Criterion 4 a two way door (e.g., if it doesnt meet Criterion 4, Specification can be relocated even if it meets Criteria 1, 2, or 3).
Significant Systems out of Technical
Not applicable BWOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4 and 7 CEOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 6 BWROG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 8 WOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, and 5}}
* Approach favored by NEI and NRC is making Specifications                                          Criterion 4 a two way door (e.g., if it doesnt meet Criterion 4, Specification can be relocated even if it meets Criteria 1, 2, or 3).
BWOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4 and 7 CEOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 6 BWROG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 8 WOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, and 5 Page 8 of 2                                                                9/09/2004}}

Latest revision as of 01:25, 16 January 2025

Enclosure 4 Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force (RITSTF) Risk Management Technical Specification Initiative Status
ML042580010
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/15/2004
From: Tjader T
NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB
To: Bradley B
Nuclear Energy Institute
Tjader T., NRC/IROB, 415-1187
Shared Package
ML042580006 List:
References
Download: ML042580010 (8)
v • d • e


Text

RISK INFORMED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE (RITSTF)

RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION INITIATIVE STATUS NEI RITSTF NEI Biff Bradley, 202 739-8083 WOG Jack Stringfellow, Southern Nuclear, 205 992-7037 CEOG Alan Hackerott, OPPD, 402 533-7276 Tony Pietrangelo, 202 739-8081 Jim Andrachek, Westinghouse, 412 374-5018 Gary Chung, SCE, 949 368-9431 EXCEL/

TSTF Donald Hoffman, 301 984-4400 Jerry Andre, Westinghouse, 412 374-4723 Ray Schneider, CE, 860 731-6461 EPRI Frank Rahn, 650 855-2037 BWOG Paul Infanger, Progress Energy, 352-563-4796 BWROG Rick Hill, GE, 408 925-5388 John Gaertner, 704 547-6169 R. Schomaker, Framatome, 434 832-2917 Dusty Rhoads, Energy Northwest, 509 377-4298 Mike Kitlan, Duke, 980 373-8348 Don McCamy, TVA 256 729-4595 Page 1 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/

RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 1

Technical Specification Required Actions Preferred End States Industry and NRC developing implementation guidance for TSTF-422 and TSTF-423.

NRC/Industry met 1/30/04 on TSTF 422 and TSTF 423. The NRC/RITSTF agreed to resolutions for all the NRC comments.

A draft of the TSTF-422 implementation guidance document was provided to the NRC for comment in 6/04. NRC provided comments on 7/9/04 and a revised document has been developed to address these comments. The document will be submitted to NRC by 9/20/04.

NRC will attempt to issue TSTF 422 Notice for Comment and Availability in 2004.

TSTF-423 was submitted to the NRC on 8/12/03.

RITSTF provided draft responses to NRC comments on TSTF 423 at the 1/30/04 meeting.

A draft of the TSTF-423 implementation guidance document was provided to the NRC on 7/20/04.

The NRC had not provided any comments before the 9/9/04 meeting.

The NRC wants more information in the BWROG TSTF 423 Implementation Guidance.

Based on review of the CEOG TSTF 422 Implementation Guidance, the NRC will provide the scope of additional information they want to BWROG.

CEOG - TSTF-422 R0 BWROG - TSTF-423 R0 BWOG - TSTF-431 R0 WOG - TSTF-432 R0 (Not created)

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS Page 2 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/

RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 1

Technical Specification Required Actions Preferred End States Industry and NRC developing implementation guidance for TSTF-422 and TSTF-423.

BWOG Topical Report was submitted to NRC on 1/19/04. The NRC provided an RAI on 6/29/04.

BWOG informed the NRC they could not respond to the RAI until early 2005, and the NRC has put review of the Topical Report on hold.

TSTF-431 has been distributed to the BWOG and the RITSTF for review.

CEOG - TSTF-422 R0 BWROG - TSTF-423 R0 BWOG - TSTF-431 R0 WOG - TSTF-432 R0 (Not created)

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS Page 3 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/

RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 2

Missed Surveillances SR 3.0.3 TSTF-358, R6, has been approved and published for CLIIP adoption.

Initiative Complete.

TSTF-358 R6 3

Increase Flexibility in Mode Restraints LCO 3.0.4 TSTF-359, R9, has been approved and published for CLIIP adoption.

The final Implementation Guidance, NEI-03-10, was issued on September 5, 2003.

Initiative Complete.

TSTF-359 R9 4a Individual Risk Informed Allowed Outage Times (AOTs)

Owners Groups (OGs) are pursuing generic Risk Informed AOT extensions through OG-specific Topicals and license amendments.

Ongoing.

TSTF-373 R2 (CEOG)

TSTF-409 R1 (CEOG)

TSTF-417 R0 (WOG)

TSTF-430 R0 (BWOG)

TSTF-439 R1 (ALL OG)

TSTF-446 R0 (WOG)

TSTF-454 R0 (BWROG)

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS Page 4 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/

RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 4b Risk Informed AOTs With Configuration Risk Management Program or Maintenance Rule Backstop Hope Creek, Fort Calhoun, South Texas Project, and Prairie Island have volunteered to develop pilot submittals.

Fort Calhoun and South Texas Project have submitted their pilots.

RITSTF will develop a White Paper to address the interface of the a.4 process to the Initiative 4b and Initiative 6 process to show the overlap and transition for ITS and non ITS plants and provide to NRC in October 2004.

NRC provided 3 separate RAIs in 8/04 to NEI.

The RITSTF has created an Initiative 4b Subgroup to coordinate responses to the NRC RAIs.

Current schedule is to provide responses to NRC and meet in 12/04.

TSTF-424 R0 5a Relocate Surveillance Requirements Not Related to Safety Deterministic portion of Initiative 5 transferred to TSTF responsibility.

TSTF reviewing candidate SRs to be relocated.

TSTF will provide a TSTF to the NRC by 12/04.

None assigned 5b Relocate Surveillance Test Intervals to Licensee Control RITSTF/BWROG/Pilot Plant will be applying the methodology and interfacing with the NRC on the issues in 2004.

NRC attended several Limerick IDP meetings to observe process.

The Limerick lead plant license amendment was submitted on June 11, 2004.

TSTF-425 was submitted to the NRC on 8/31/04.

NEI is preparing the methodology document for submittal to the NRC in 09/04.

TSTF-425 R0

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS Page 5 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/

RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 6a Modify LCO 3.0.3 Actions and Timing 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> - 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> On hold.

On hold for resolution of Initiative 6b and 6c to determine if Initiative 6a is required.

None assigned 6b Provide Conditions in the LCOs for Those Levels of Degradation Where No Condition Currently Exists to Preclude Entry Into LCO 3.0.3 NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report on 7/9/04.

TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on 8/30/2004.

CEOG submitted revised version of Topical Report to address NRC RAIs in 10/03.

NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report on 7/9/04.

TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04.

RITSTF submit draft Implementation Guidance in 11/04.

TSTF-426 R0 6c Provide Specific Times in the LCO For Those Conditions That Require Entry Into LCO 3.0.3 Immediately NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report on 7/9/04.

TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on 8/30/2004.

CEOG submitted revised version of Topical Report to address NRC RAIs in 10/03.

NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report on 7/9/04.

TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04.

RITSTF submit draft Implementation Guidance in 11/04.

TSTF-426 R0

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS Page 6 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/

RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 7a Impact of Non Technical Specification Design Features on Operability Requirements - Barriers TSTF-372, Rev. 4 submitted on 4/23/04.

TSTF-427 submitted on 3/4/03.

NRC provided comments on TSTF-427 on 6/26/03.

Draft Revision 4 of TSTF-372 created on 2/24/03.

NRC reviewed and agreed it addressed their comments. TSTF-372, Rev. 4 submitted to NRC on 4/23/04.

On 5/28/04, the NRC requested additional information to support review of TSTF-372. The TSTF/RITSTF responded on 6/7/04.

NRC requested additional information in 7/04 and Industry/NEI responded with responses 9/7/04.

NRC plans FRN for Comment for TSTF 372 by 10/04.

NRC provided feedback on RITSTF responses on TSTF 427 in February 2004.

TSTF/RITSTF will delete the additions to the definition of OPERABILITY for TSTF 427 to address NRC concerns.

TSTF-427 implementation guidance being developed and will be provided to the NRC by 09/17/04.

TSTF/RITSTF will provide a revision to TSTF-427 after completion of the implementation guidance document.

TSTF-372 R4 TSTF-427 R0

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS Page 7 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/

RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 7b Impact of Non TS Design Features on Operability Requirements - All other SSCs not in Technical Specifications A White Paper on the process to address this scope of SSCs is being developed.

RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the process to address this scope of SSCs by 10/04.

RITSTF/TSTF reviewed and has commented on the revised Operability guidance that will supersede the guidance distributed with GL 91-18.

RITSTF/TSTF will develop a TSTF and submit to NRC by 12/04.

None assigned 8a Remove or Relocate Systems LCOs That Do Not Meet the 4 Criterion of 10 CFR 50.36 From Technical Specifications A White Paper on the application of the 10 CFR 50.36 criteria is being developed.

NEI 00-04 is being reviewed and will serve as the basis for Criterion 4 application.

RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the guidance and methodology based on NEI 00-04 for the application of the four criteria of 10 CFR 50.36 and a list of the systems identified for relocation. RITSTF working on the schedule -

current plans are fourth quarter 2004.

None assigned

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS Page 8 of 2 9/09/2004 INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/

RESPONSIBILITY TSTF NUMBER 8b Modify 50.36 Rule to Permit Removal or Relocation of Non Risk Significant Systems out of Technical Specifications Requires Rulemaking RITSTF looking at coordinating Initiative 8b with longer term initiatives given the requirements for rulemaking.

Approach favored by NEI and NRC is making Criterion 4 a two way door (e.g., if it doesnt meet Criterion 4, Specification can be relocated even if it meets Criteria 1, 2, or 3).

Not applicable BWOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4 and 7 CEOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 6 BWROG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 8 WOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, and 5

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML042580010&oldid=5395490"