RS-13-140, Exemption Request for Transnuclear TN-68 Casks Loaded with Fuel Bundles with Incorrect Cooling Times: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1010CFRCFR72.772.7 RS-1 3-140 RS-13-140 May 23, 2013 May 23,2013 ATTN: Document Control Desk ADirecto TIN: r,  Document Division of  Control SpentDesk Fuel Storage and Transportation Director, Office of Nuclear Material Fuel Division   of   Spent         Storage and Transportation Safety and Safeguards Office   of   Nuclear     Material U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission    Safety   and Safeguards U. S. Nuclear       Regulatory Washington, DC 20555-0001              Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Peach ReneweBottom        Atomic Power Station,, Units Units 22 and and 33 d Facility Operating License Nos. DPR -44 and DPR-56 Renewed NRC           Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-44 and DPR-56 Docket Nos. 50-277, 50-278, NRC Docket Nos. 50-277. 50-278. and              and 72-29 72-29
{{#Wiki_filter:10 CFR 72.7 RS-1 3-140 May 23, 2013 ATTN: Document Control Desk Director, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR -44 and DPR-56 NRC Docket Nos. 50-277, 50-278, and 72-29


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Exemption Request for Transnuclear TN-68 Casks Loaded with Fuel Bundle
Exemption Request for Transnuclear TN-68 Casks Loaded with Fuel Bundles with Incorrect Cooling Times In accordance with 10 CFR 72.7, "Specific exemptions," Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC) is requesting NRC approval of a one-time exemption for the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) from the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3) and (b)(11). Specifically, the exemption request addresses the non-compliance of four spent fuel assemblies with the terms and conditions of the Transnuclear, Inc. (TN) Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Number 1027, Amendment 0, at the time of loading.
The regulations require, in part, compliance to the terms and conditions of CoC 1027. Contrary to this requirement, in June and July 2001, four PBAPS Unit 3 fuel assemblies with cooling times less than the minimum cooling time specified in CoC 1027, Amendment 0, Appendix A, Technical Specification (TS) 2.1.1, Table 2.1.1-1, "Minimum Acceptable Cooling Time as a Function of Max. Burnup and Min. Initial Enrichment," were loaded into four TN -68 casks (i.e.,
one assembly per cask). Specifically, the four fuel assemblies had been cooled for 9.8 years instead of the required period of 10 years.
EGC identified this condition on January 24, 2013, during a review of ISFSI fuel characterization data. Upon discovery, EGC verified that the actual heat load of each fuel bundle, at the time of loading, was less than the limit specified in TS 2.1.1.E.ii. The decay heat of the assemblies has continued to decrease since their initial loading in June and July 2001. As of September 14, 2001, the four assemblies were in compliance with the TS 2.2.1, Table 2.1.1-1 Cooling Time requirement.
RS-13-140 May 23,2013 A TIN: Document Control Desk Director, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-44 and DPR-56 NRC Docket Nos. 50-277. 50-278. and 72-29 10 CFR 72.7


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Exemption                                                                                         s with    IncorreRequest ct Cooling for Transnuclear TN-68 Casks Loaded with Fuel Bundles Times with Incorrect Cooling Times In accordance with 10 CFR 72.7, "Specific exemptions," Exelon Generation Compa In accordance        with                                                                                  ny, LLC (EGC)      is request    ing10    CFR 72.7, "Specific exemptions," Exelon Generation Company, NRC    approval of a one-time exemption for the Peach Bottom Atomic Power LLC (EGC)     is requesting       NRC   approval     of a one-time   exemption Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)  for the Peach   Bottom Atomic     Power Station     (PBAPS),       Units   2 and   3 Independent       Spent   Fuel Storage   Installation (ISFSI) from from  the the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3) and (b)(11). Specifically, the exemption requirements ses the of          CFR 72.212(b)(3) and (b)(11). Specifically, the exemption request 10-com addres                non          pliance of four spent fuel assemblies with the terms andrequest addresses the  Transnuclear,the non-compliance Inc. (TN) Certific of four spent fuel assemblies with the terms andconditi              ons of conditions     of ate of Compliance (CoC) Number 1027, Amendment 0, at the the Transnuclear, time of loading.              Inc. (TN)   Certificate   of   Compliance   (CoC)   Number   1027,   Amendment       0, at the time of loading.
Exemption Request for Transnuclear TN-68 Casks Loaded with Fuel Bundles with Incorrect Cooling Times In accordance with 10 CFR 72.7, "Specific exemptions," Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC) is requesting NRC approval of a one-time exemption for the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) from the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3) and (b)(11). Specifically, the exemption request addresses the non-compliance of four spent fuel assemblies with the terms and conditions of the Transnuclear, Inc. (TN) Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Number 1027, Amendment 0, at the time of loading.
The regulations require, in part, compliance to the terms and conditions of CoC toThe thisregulations requirement,    require,    in part, compliance to the terms and conditions of CoC 1027.
The regulations require, in part, compliance to the terms and conditions of CoC 1027. Contrary to this requirement, in June and July 2001, four PBAPS Unit 3 fuel assemblies with cooling times less than the minimum cooling time specified in CoC 1027, Amendment 0, Appendix A, Technical Specification (TS) 2.1.1, Table 2.1.1-1, "Minimum Acceptable Cooling Time as a Function of Max. Burnup and Min. Initial Enrichment," were loaded into four TN-68 casks (Le.,
in June                                                                  1027.Contra Contraryry and July 2001, four PBAPS Unit 3 fuel assemblies with cooling to thisless times      requirement, than the minimu  in June and July 2001, four PBAPS Unit 3 fuel assemblies with cooling m cooling time specified in CoC 1027, Amendment 0, Appendix A, times   less   than   the   minimum Technical Specification (TS) 2.1.1,          cooling time specified in CoC 1027, Amendment 0, Appendix A, Table 2.1.1-1, "Minimum Acceptable Cooling Time as a Technical Functio    n of Specification Max. Burnup (TS)           2.1.1, Table 2.1.1-1, "Minimum and Min.                                      Acceptable Cooling Time as a Initial Enrichment," were loaded into four TN -68 casks (i.e.,
one assembly per cask). Specifically, the four fuel assemblies had been cooled for 9.8 years instead of the required period of 10 years.
Function     of Max. Burnup     and   Min. Initial Enrichment,"
EGC identified this condition on January 24, 2013, during a review of ISFSI fuel characterization data. Upon discovery, EGC verified that the actual heat load of each fuel bundle, at the time of loading, was less than the limit specified in TS 2.1.1. E.ii. The decay heat of the assemblies has continued to decrease since their initial loading in June and July 2001. As of September 14, 2001, the four assemblies were in compliance with the TS 2.2.1, Table 2.1.1-1 Cooling Time requirement.  
one assembly per cask). Specifically, the four fuel assemblies had been      were   loaded   into four TN-68 casks (Le.,
one assembly         per   cask). Specifically, instead of the required period of 10 years.              the  four fuel assemblies     had beencooled cooledfor for9.8 9.8years years instead of the required period of 10 years.
EGC identified this condition on January 24, 2013, during a review of ISFSI fuel EGCUpon identified    thisry,condition    on January 24, 2013, during a review of ISFSI fuel          charact  erization characterization data.             discove          EGC verified       that the actual heat load of each fuel bundle, at the time of data. Upon      discovery,      EGC    verified  that  the actual  heat loading, was less than the limit specified in TS 2.1.1.E.ii. The decay heat of load  of each  fuel  bundle, at  the   time of loading,                                                                                            the assemb the limit specified in TS 2.1.1. E.ii. The decay heat of the assemblieshas      lies continu    edwas    less than to decreas      e since  their initial loading in June and July 2001. As of September 14, has continued       to decrease       since   their initial loading in June 2001, the four assemblies were in compliance with the TS 2.2.1, Table 2.1.1-1  and   July 2001. As of September       14, the four assemblies were in compliance with the TS 2.2.1, Table 2.1.1-1 2001, ment.                                                                                            Cooling Cooling  Time Time require requirement.


May 23, 20132013 U. S. Nuclear Nuclear Regulatory Regulatory Commission Commission Page 2 EGC also conducted conducted an anextent extentofofcondition conditionreview reviewforfor all all fuel assemblies assembliescurrently currently stored storedwithin within the PBAPS PBAPS ISFSI. All other loaded fuel assemblies were in compliance with the TSCooling ISFSI. All  other  loaded  fuel assemblies    were    in compliance  with  the TS   Cooling Time requirement, at    at the the time time of of loading.
May 23, 2013 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 EGC also conducted an extent of condition review for all fuel assemblies currently stored within the PBAPS ISFSI. All other loaded fuel assemblies were in compliance with the TS Cooling Time requirement, at the time of loading.
loading.
The attachment to this letter describes the need and justification for the issuance of an exemption, as well as an environmental assessment of the proposed action.
The attachment attachment toto this this letter letter describes describes the the need needand andjustification justification for for the issuance issuance ofof an an exemption, exemption, as well       as an environmental well as                        assessment of environmental assessment          of the the proposed proposed action.
There are no regulatory commitments in this submittal.
action.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. John L. Schrage at (630) 657-2821.
There There are are no no regulatory regulatory commitments commitments in  in this this submittal.
Respectfully,
submittal.
IfIf you have have any any questions questionsor  orrequire requireadditional additional information, information, please pleasecontact contactMr.Mr. John John L.L. Schrage Schrage at at (630)
(630) 657-2821.
657-2821.
Respectfully, Respectfully, Patrick R. Simpson Manager - Licensing


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation cc:
NRC Regional Administrator - Region I May 23, 2013 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 EGC also conducted an extent of condition review for all fuel assemblies currently stored within the PBAPS ISFSI. All other loaded fuel assemblies were in compliance with the TS Cooling Time requirement, at the time of loading.
The attachment to this letter describes the need and justification for the issuance of an exemption, as well as an environmental assessment of the proposed action.
There are no regulatory commitments in this submittal.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. John L. Schrage at (630) 657-2821.
Respectfully, Patrick R. Simpson Manager - Licensing


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
10 10CFRCFR72.772.7Exemption ExemptionRequest, Request,Peach PeachBottom BottomAtomic AtomicPower PowerStation Station Independent Independent SpentSpentFuelFuelStorage StorageInstallation Installation cc:
10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation cc:
cc:      NRC NRC Regional Regional Administrator Administrator -- Region Region II
NRC Regional Administrator - Region I


Attachment Attachment 10  CFR    72.7 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption  Exemption Request  Request Peach       Bottom       Atomic Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station      Power       Station Independent Spent Independent            Spent Fuel Fuel Storage Storage Installation Installation
Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
 
===1.
Background===
The Transnuclear, Inc., (TN) TN-68 storage system is designed to store 68 spent fuel assemblies for independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) deployment. The system is listed in 10 CFR 72.214 as Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Number 1027. This system is currently installed and in use at the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS) under a 10 CFR Part 72 general license.
During a January 2013 internal review of historical ISFSI fuel characterization for PBAPS, Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC) identified that in June and July 2001, four PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel assemblies with cooling times less than the minimum cooling time specified in CoC 1027, Amendment 0, Appendix A, Technical Specification (TS) 2.1.1, Table 2.1.1-1, "Minimum Acceptable Cooling Time as a Function of Max. Burnup and Min. Initial Enrichment," were loaded into four TN-68 casks (i.e., one assembly per cask).
Specifically, the four spent fuel assemblies had been cooled for approximately 9.8 years instead of the required 10 years that is specified in TS Table 2.1.1-1. Upon discovery of the TS non-compliance, EGC verified that the actual heat load of each fuel bundle, at the time of loading, was less than the limit specified in TS 2.1.1.E.ii. The decay heat of the assemblies has continued to decrease since their initial loading in June and July 2001. As of September 14, 2001, the four assemblies fully complied with the TS 2.2.1, Table 2.1.1-1 cooling time requirement.
EGC also conducted an extent of condition review for all fuel assemblies currently stored within the PBAPS ISFSI. All other loaded fuel assemblies were in compliance with the TS cooling time requirement, at the time of loading.
As required by TS 2.2.2, EGC notified the NRC Operations Center within 24 hours of discovery of the TS non-compliance (i.e., ENS notification 48698). Similarly, as required by TS 2.2.3, EGC provided a 30-day special report to the NRC on February 22, 2013. This special report described the cause of the TS non-compliance and the actions taken to restore compliance and prevent recurrence. EGC also indicated in the special report that a one-time exemption request would be submitted to obtain NRC approval for the period of time that the four spent fuel assemblies were non-compliant with the TS-required cooling time.
: 2. Request for Exemption In accordance with 10 CFR 72.7, "Specific exemptions," EGC is requesting NRC approval of a one-time exemption for the PBAPS, Units 2 and 3 ISFSI from the following requirements of 10 CFR 72.212, due to a non-compliance with the terms and conditions of CoC 1027.
10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), which states the general licensee must "[e]nsure that each cask used by the general licensee conforms to the terms, conditions, and specifications of a CoC or an amended CoC listed in § 72.214" n
The portion of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(11) which states that " [t]he licensee shall comply with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC...."
Page 1 of 8


===1. Background===
===1. Background===
: 1. Background The Transnuclear, The     Transnuclear, Inc.,         (TN) TN-68 Inc., (TN)      TN-68storage storage systemsystem is  is designed designed to    to store store 6868 spent spentfuel fuel assemblies for independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) deployment. The system assemblies        for  independent          spent  fuel    storage    installation        (ISFSI)      deployment.        The    system is listed is  listed inin 10 10 CFR CFR 72.214 72.214 as  as Certificate Certificate of    of Compliance Compliance (CoC)   (CoC) NumberNumber 1027. 1027. ThisThis system system is  is currently installed currently      installed andand inin use use atat the the Peach PeachBottomBottom Atomic Atomic Power  Power Station Station (PBAPS)
Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation The Transnuclear, Inc., (TN) TN-68 storage system is designed to store 68 spent fuel assemblies for independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) deployment. The system is listed in 10 CFR 72.214 as Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Number 1027. This system is currently installed and in use at the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS) under a 10 CFR Part 72 general license.
(PBAPS) under under aa 1010 CFR CFR Part Part 7272 general general license.
During a January 2013 internal review of historical ISFSI fuel characterization for PBAPS, Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGG) identified that in June and July 2001, four PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel assemblies with cooling times less than the minimum cooling time specified in CoC 1027, Amendment 0, Appendix A, Technical Specification (TS) 2.1.1, Table 2.1.1-1, "Minimum Acceptable Cooling Time as a Function of Max. Burnup and Min. Initial Enrichment," were loaded into four TN-68 casks (Le., one assembly per cask).
license.
Specifically, the four spent fuel assemblies had been cooled for approximately 9.8 years instead of the required 10 years that is specified in TS Table 2.1.1-1. Upon discovery of the TS non-compliance, EGC verified that the actual heat load of each fuel bundle, at the time of loading, was less than the limit specified in TS 2.1.1.E.ii. The decay heat of the assemblies has continued to decrease since their initial loading in June and July 2001. As of September 14, 2001, the four assemblies fully complied with the TS 2.2.1, Table 2.1.1-1 cooling time requirement.
During aa January During          January 2013 2013 internal internal review review of  of historical historical ISFSI ISFSI fuel fuel characterization characterization for    for PBAPS, PBAPS, Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGG) identified that in June and July 2001 , four PBAPS Exelon    Generation      Company,        LLC    (EGC)      identified      that  in  June    and    July  2001,    four    PBAPS Unit33 spent Unit       spent fuel fuel assemblies assemblies with    with cooling       times less cooling times        less thanthan thethe minimum minimum cooling cooling timetime specified specified in CoC in  CoC 1027, 1027, Amendment Amendment 0,        0, Appendix Appendix A,        Technical Specification A, Technical         Specification (TS)           2.1.1, Table (TS) 2.1.1,      Table 2.1.1-1, 2.1.1-1, "Minimum        Acceptable      Cooling      Time    as  a Function "Minimum Acceptable Cooling Time as a Function of Max. Burnup and Min. Initialof    Max. Burnup      and    Min. Initial Enrichment," were Enrichment,"          were loaded loaded into into four fourTN-68 TN-68casks  casks (Le.,
EGC also conducted an extent of condition review for all fuel assemblies currently stored within the PBAPS ISFSI. All other loaded fuel assemblies were in compliance with the TS cooling time requirement, at the time of loading.
(i.e., one one assembly assembly per    per cask).
As required by TS 2.2.2, EGC notified the NRC Operations Center within 24 hours of discovery of the TS non-compliance (Le., ENS notification 48698). Similarly, as required by TS 2.2.3, EGC provided a 30-day special report to the NRC on February 22, 2013. This special report described the cause of the TS non-compliance and the actions taken to restore compliance and prevent recurrence. EGC also indicated in the special report that a one-time exemption request would be submitted to obtain NRC approval for the period of time that the four spent fuel assemblies were non-compliant with the TS-required cooling time.
cask).
: 2. Request for Exemption In accordance with 10 CFR 72.7, "Specific exemptions," EGC is requesting NRC approval of a one-time exemption for the PBAPS, Units 2 and 3 ISFSI from the following requirements of 10 CFR 72.212, due to a non-compliance with the terms and conditions of CoC 1027.
Specifically,the Specifically,        thefour fourspent spentfuel fuelassemblies assemblies had   had been been cooled cooled for  for approximately approximately 9.8      9.8 years years instead of the required 10 years that is specified in TS Table 2.1.1-1. Upon discoveryof instead     of the required     10   years     that is specified     in TS   Table     2.1.1-1.     Upon   discovery         ofthe the TS non-compliance, EGC verified that the actual heat load of each fuel bundle, at the timeof TS     non-compliance,         EGC     verified     that   the   actual   heat   load   of   each     fuel bundle,     at the   time   of loading, was loading,      was less less than than the the limit      specifiedininTS limit specified             TS2.1.1.E.ii.
10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), which states the general licensee must "[e]nsure that each cask used by the general licensee conforms to the terms, conditions, and specifications of a CoC or an amended CoC listed in § 72.214" The portion of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(11) which states that" [t]he licensee shall comply with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC.... "
2.1.1.E.ii.The   Thedecay decay heat heat ofof the the assemblies assemblies has continued has      continued to  to decrease decreasesince  sincetheir their initial     loading in initial loading        inJune June andand JulyJuly 2001.
Page 1 of 8
2001. As As of of September 14, September         14, 2001, 2001, thethe four four assemblies assemblies fully  fully complied compliedwith    withthe  theTS TS2.2.1, 2.2.1,Table Table2.1.1-1 2.1.1-1 cooling time cooling      time requirement.
requirement.
EGC also EGC       also conducted conducted an    an extent extentof  of condition condition reviewreview forfor allall fuel fuel assemblies assemblies currently currently stored stored within within the PBAPS ISFSI. All other loaded fuel assemblies were in compliancewith the  PBAPS      ISFSI. All  other    loaded      fuel  assemblies          were    in  compliance         with the the TSTS cooling      time  requirement,        at  the cooling time requirement, at the time of loading. time  of    loading.
As As required required by  by TS TS 2.2.2, 2.2.2, EGCEGC notified notified the the NRC NRC Operations OperationsCenter    Centerwithin within24 24hours hoursofof discovery discovery of       the TS of the  TS non-compliance non-compliance (i.e.,    (Le., ENSENS notification notification 48698).48698). Similarly, Similarly, as as required required by by TS TS 2.2.3, 2.2.3, EGCEGC provided provided aa 30-day 30-day special special report report to to the the NRCNRC on  on February February 22,  22, 2013.
2013. This This special special report report described described the  the cause causeof  of the the TS TS non-compliance non-compliance and         and thethe actions actions taken takento  to restore restore compliance and prevent recurrence. EGC also indicated in the special report compliance        and  prevent      recurrence.        EGC    also    indicated      in  the  special      reportthatthataa one-time one-time exemption request would be submitted to obtain NRC approval for the periodof exemption      request      would    be  submitted      to  obtain      NRC      approval      for  the    period     of time time thatthat the the four four spent spent fuelfuel assemblies assemblieswere    werenon-compliant non-compliantwith      with thetheTS-required TS-requiredcooling  cooling time.
time.
2.
: 2. Request Request for  for Exemption Exemption In  accordance with In accordance       with 10 10 CFR CFR 72.7, 72.7, "Specific "Specific exemptions,"
exemptions,"EGC       EGCisisrequesting requestingNRC    NRCapproval approvalofof aa one-time one-time exemption for the PBAPS, Units 2 and 3 ISFSI from the following requirementsofof exemption       for   the   PBAPS,     Units     2 and   3 ISFSI     from   the   following     requirements 10 10 CFR CFR 72.212, 72.212, duedueto  toaanon-compliance non-compliancewith        with the theterms termsand    andconditions conditionsofofCoC  CoC1027.1027.
    **    10 10 CFR CFR 72.212(b)(3),
72.212(b)(3), which  which states states the the general general licensee licenseemust  must"[e]nsure
                                                                                                            "[e]nsure thatthat each each caskcask used used by the general licensee conforms to the terms, conditions, and specificationsofofaa by  the  general    licensee      conforms      to  the  terms,      conditions,        and  specifications CoC CoC or or an an amended amendedCoC      CoClisted listed inin §§ 72.214" 72.214" n*    The The portion portion of of 10 10CFRCFR72.212(b)(11) 72.212(b)(11)which    which states states thatthat" " [t]he
[t]he licensee licensee shallshall comply comply withwith the the terms, terms, conditions, conditions, and   andspecifications specificationsof      ofthe the CoC...."
CoC .... "
Page Page11of  of 88


Attachment Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Exemption RequestRequest Peach Bottom Bottom Atomic Power Station Atomic    Power      Station Independent Independent Spent Spent Fuel Fuel Storage Storage Installation Insta"ation Specifically, fourfour spent spent fuel fuel assemblies assemblies were werenon-compliant, non-compliant,at       atthe thetimetimeof  ofloading, loading,withwith the the cooling time     requirement in CoC 1027 time requirement                    1027 Amendment 0, Appendix  Appendix A, TS 2.2.1 for            for durations durations ranging    from58 ranging from         58toto8686days.
Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Specifically, four spent fuel assemblies were non-compliant, at the time of loading, with the cooling time requirement in CoC 1027 Amendment 0, Appendix A, TS 2.2.1 for durations ranging from 58 to 86 days. As of September 14, 2001, all four spent nuclear fuel assemblies were in compliance with the terms and conditions of CoC 1027.
days. AsAs of   September 14, 2001, of September           2001, all fourfour spent nuclearnuclear fuelfuel assemblies   were     in compliance     with   the terms assemblies were in compliance with the terms and conditions     and  conditions      of CoC     1027.
These assemblies, the associated cask numbers, maximum burnup values, load dates, and CoC non-compliance durations are listed in the Table below. All four are GE6 8x8 type assemblies, with a uranium content of 0.182 MTU, a minimum initial bundle average enrichment of 2.99%, and a last at-power date of September 14, 1991.
1027.
Assembly No.
These assemblies, assemblies, the    the associated associatedcask casknumbers, numbers,maximum maximum burnup  burn up values, load    load dates, and  and CoC non-compliance durations   durations arearelisted listedinin the theTable Tablebelow.
Cask No.
below.All   Allfour fourare areGE6 GE68x8 8x8type type assemblies, assemblies,with   with aa uranium uranium content contentof  of0.182 0.182MTU,MTU, aa minimum minimum initial                      average initial bundle average enrichment of  of 2.99%,
Maximum Burnup (GWd/MTU)
2.99%, andand aa last at-power date of September September 14,   14, 1991.
Load Date CoC Non-compliance Duration LJW874 TN-68-05 29.582 19-Jun-2001 86 days LJW875 TN-68-06 29.577 26-Jun-2001 79 days LJW882 TN-68-07 29.578 10-Jul-2001 65 days LJW867 TN-68-08 29.580 17-Jul-2001 58 days 3.
1991.
Basis for Approval of Exemption Request In accordance with 10 CFR 72.7, the NRC may, upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant such exemptions from the requirements of the regulations in this part as it determines are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the public interest.
Assembly             Cask No. I   Maximum Maximum              Load Date                     CoC No.                           I     Burnup                                 Non-compliance Non-compliance (GWd/MTU)
a.
                                          * (GWdlMTU)                                           Duration LJW874               TN-68-05           29.582             19-Jun-2001 19-Jun-2001                  86 days LJW875 WW875               TN-68-06           29.577           26-Jun-2001                   79 days LJW882               TN-68-07           29.578             10-Jul-2001                   65 days LJW867 WW867               TN-68-08           29.580             17-Jul-2001 17 -Jul-2001                  58 days Approval of Exemption Request
Authorized by Law This exemption would allow EGC to continue to store four spent nuclear fuel assemblies at the PBAPS ISFSI which were, at the time of loading in June and July 2001, in non -
: 3. Basis for Approval In accordance In  accordance with   with 1010 CFR CFR 72.7, 72.7, the NRC may,  may, upon application application by      by any any interested person or upon its own initiative, initiative,grant grant such such exemptions from  from the requirements requirements of        of the the regulations regulations in  in this part asas itit determines determines are areauthorized authorizedby  bylaw lawandandwill will not not endanger endangerlife      lifeororproperty propertyor  orthe the defense and common defense             and security security and and are areotherwise otherwiseininthe  thepublic publicinterest.
compliance with the minimum cooling time requirement specified in CoC 1027, Amendment 0, Appendix A, TS 2.2.1, Table 2.1.1-1. All four spent nuclear fuel assemblies currently comply with all TS requirements.
interest.
The NRC issued 10 CFR 72.7 under the authority granted to it under Section 133 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 10153. Section 72.7 allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 72. Granting the proposed exemption provides adequate protection to public health and safety, and the environment. As described below, the proposed exemption will not endanger life or property, or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest.
: a. Authorized by Law This exemption would allow EGC to continue to                  to store store four four spent spent nuclear nuclear fuelfuel assemblies assemblies at the PBAPS ISFSI which were, at the time of loading in                     in June June and and JulyJuly 2001, 2001, in   non--
Therefore, the exemption is authorized by law.
in non compliance with    with the minimum cooling time requirementrequirement specified specified in    in CoC CoC 1027, 1027, Amendment 0,       0, Appendix Appendix A,  A, TS TS 2.2.1, 2.2.1, Table Table 2.1.1-1.
Page 2 of 8 Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Insta"ation Specifically, four spent fuel assemblies were non-compliant, at the time of loading, with the cooling time requirement in CoC 1027 Amendment 0, Appendix A, TS 2.2.1 for durations ranging from 58 to 86 days. As of September 14, 2001, all four spent nuclear fuel assemblies were in compliance with the terms and conditions of CoC 1027.
2.1.1-1. All All four four spent spent nuclear nuclear fuel assemblies currently comply with all TS requirements.
These assemblies, the associated cask numbers, maximum burn up values, load dates, and CoC non-compliance durations are listed in the Table below. All four are GE6 8x8 type assemblies, with a uranium content of 0.182 MTU, a minimum initial bundle average enrichment of 2.99%, and a last at-power date of September 14, 1991.
The NRC         issued 10 CFR 72.7 under NRC issued                          under the the authority authority granted granted to    to itit under under Section Section 133 133 ofof the Nuclear Waste Nuclear      Waste Policy Policy Act Actofof1982, 1982,as as amended, amended, 42 U.S.C. § 10153. Section             Section72.772.7allows allows the NRC to    to grant grant exemptions exemptions from from the the requirements of 10 CFR      CFR Part 72. Granting   Granting thethe proposed exemption provides   provides adequate adequate protection protection to public        health and public health           and safety, safety, and the environment. As environment.          As described described below, below, the the proposed proposedexemption exemptionwill    will not endanger endangerlife life or property,       or the common     defense   and   security,   and   is otherwise property, or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public                in the   public   interest.
Assembly Cask No. I Maximum Load Date CoC No.
Therefore, the exemption is authorized by             by law.
I Burnup Non-compliance  
law.
* (GWdlMTU)
Page 2 of 8 Page
Duration LJW874 TN-68-05 29.582 19-Jun-2001 86 days WW875 TN-68-06 29.577 26-Jun-2001 79 days LJW882 TN-68-07 29.578 10-Jul-2001 65 days WW867 TN-68-08 29.580 17 -Jul-2001 58 days
: 3. Basis for Approval of Exemption Request In accordance with 10 CFR 72.7, the NRC may, upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant such exemptions from the requirements of the regulations in this part as it determines are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the public interest.
: a. Authorized by Law This exemption would allow EGC to continue to store four spent nuclear fuel assemblies at the PBAPS ISFSI which were, at the time of loading in June and July 2001, in non-compliance with the minimum cooling time requirement specified in CoC 1027, Amendment 0, Appendix A, TS 2.2.1, Table 2.1.1-1. All four spent nuclear fuel assemblies currently comply with all TS requirements.
The NRC issued 10 CFR 72.7 under the authority granted to it under Section 133 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 10153. Section 72.7 allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 72. Granting the proposed exemption provides adequate protection to public health and safety, and the environment. As described below, the proposed exemption will not endanger life or property, or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest.
Therefore, the exemption is authorized by law.
Page 2 of 8  


Attachment Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption  Exemption Request    Request Peach Bottom Bottom AtomicAtomic Power   PowerStation Station Independent             Spent     Fuel Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Storage       Installation
Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation b.
: b. Will not Endanger Endanger Life    Life or or Property Property or   or thethe Common Common Defense  Defense and     andSecurity Security EGC has has verified verified that that loading loading of    of the four spent spent nuclear nuclear fuelfuel assemblies assemblieswith  withcooling cooling times times lesslessthan thanthe theminimum minimumrequired    requiredtime, time,for  for the theapplicable applicabledurations, durations,did didnotnotimpact impact the the shielding, shielding, confinement, confinement, and      and thermal thermal design design functions functions of  of the the loaded loaded TN-68 TN-6a casks, casks, as   as described      in  the  Technical        Analysis described in the Technical Analysis section below.        section      below.
Will not Endanger Life or Property or the Common Defense and Security EGC has verified that loading of the four spent nuclear fuel assemblies with cooling times less than the minimum required time, for the applicable durations, did not impact the shielding, confinement, and thermal design functions of the loaded TN-68 casks, as described in the Technical Analysis section below.
In addition, addition, by SafetySafety Evaluation Report (SER) dated October                    October 30, 2007,  2007, the NRC NRC approved Amendment Amendment 1 to CoC 1027.              1027. This amendment, amendment, in        in part, part, increased increased the the TSTS average average assembly assemblyburn-upburn-up limit   limit andand decreased decreased the     the TSTS minimum minimum allowable cooling     cooling time time for all all fuel fuel types,     except GE 7x7 types, except                7x7 assemblies.
In addition, by Safety Evaluation Report (SER) dated October 30, 2007, the NRC approved Amendment 1 to CoC 1027. This amendment, in part, increased the TS average assembly burn-up limit and decreased the TS minimum allowable cooling time for all fuel types, except GE 7x7 assemblies. The revised minimum cooling time for 8x8, 9x9, and 10x10 assemblies is seven years, which is specified in a new fuel selection flowchart that was added to TS 2.1.1 (i.e., Figure 2.1.1-2, "Flowchart for Selection of 8x8, 9x9, and 10x10 Fuel"). This figure also includes a mathematical function for determination of decay heat as a function of fuel burnup, cooling times, and initial fuel enrichment. In April 2013, EGC updated the four applicable TN-68 casks to the requirements of CoC 1027, Amendment 1, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 72.
assemblies.The         Therevised revisedminimumminimumcooling coolingtimetimeforfor 8x8, 8x8, 9x9, andand 10x10 1Ox1 0 assemblies assembliesisisseven      sevenyears, years,which whichisisspecified specifiedininaanew    newfuelfuelselection selection flowchart that was added    added to TS       TS 22.1.1
Given that: 1) The loading of the four non-compliant spent nuclear fuel assemblies in 2001 did not impact the shielding, confinement, and thermal design functions of the loaded TN-68 casks; 2) The non-compliant condition was resolved within 86 days after loading; and 3) The TS-minimum-required cooling time has been subsequently reduced, by TS amendment, to less than the actual cooling times of the four assemblies, at time of loading, the proposed exemption does not compromise the ability of the four as -
                                                          .1.1 (i.e.,
loaded TN-68 casks to safely store the four fuel assemblies. Therefore, the proposed exemption does not endanger life or property or the common defense and security.
(Le.,Figure Figure 2.1.1-2, 2.1.1-2,"Flowchart "Flowchart for Selection Selection of  of 8x8, 8x8, 9x9, 9x9,and and10x10 1Ox1 0Fuel").
Fuel"). This Thisfigure figurealsoalsoincludes includesa amathematical mathematicalfunction  functionfor for determination of decay     decayheat  heatas  asa afunction functionofoffuel  fuelburnup, burnup,cooling coolingtimes,times,and andinitial initialfuel fuel enrichment.
enrichment. InInApril    April 2013, 2013, EGC updated the four                       applicable TN-68 casks four applicable                  casks to to the the requirements requirements of CoC 1027,         1027, Amendment Amendment 1,        1, in in accordance accordancewith    with the the requirements requirements of   of 1010 CFR 72. 72.
Given that: that: 1)1) The Theloading loading of     of the the four four non-compliant non-compliant spent nuclear fuel               fuel assemblies assemblies in     in 2001 2001 did did not notimpact impactthe  the shielding, shielding,confinement, confinement,and         andthermal thermal designdesignfunctions functionsofofthe the loaded loaded TN       -68 casks; TN-68      casks; 2) 2) The The non-compliant condition was resolved               resolvedwithin within 8686days daysafter after loading; and  and 3)3) The The TS-      minimum-requiredcooling TS-minimum-required                   cooling time time has has been subsequently subsequentlyreduced,reduced, by by TSTS amendment, amendment, to      to less lessthanthan the the actual actual cooling cooling timestimes of  of the the four     assemblies, at four assemblies,          attime time of of loading, loading, the proposed proposed exemption exemption does     doesnot  notcompromise compromisethe      theability abilityof ofthe thefour four asas--
loaded loadedTN        -68 casks TN-68      casksto  tosafely safelystore storethe thefour four fuel fuel assemblies.
assemblies. Therefore, Therefore,the   theproposed proposed exemption        does    not  endanger exemption does not endanger life or property   life  or  property          or the   common         defense defense andsecurity.
and   security.
c.
c.
: c. Otherwise Otherwise in    in the the Public Public Interest Interest The The proposed proposed exemption exemption isis based   basedon    onguidance guidanceprovided  provided in  in CoC 1027  1027 Amendment Amendment 0,       0, TS TS Bases Bases2.2.1.2.2.1.ThisThisstates states   that thatnon-compliant non-compliantfuel        fuelassemblies assembliesmay      mayremain remainininthe the associated associatedcask    caskififthis thisisisdetermined determined to       to bebeaasafe safecondition.
Otherwise in the Public Interest The proposed exemption is based on guidance provided in CoC 1027 Amendment 0, TS Bases 2.2.1. This states that non-compliant fuel assemblies may remain in the associated cask if this is determined to be a safe condition.
condition.
In addition to the proposed exemption request, EGC has considered the alternative action to correct the historical condition, as established in TS 2.2, "Functional and Operational Limits Violations." Specifically, if a Functional and Operational Limit is violated, TS 2.2.1 requires the licensee to remove the affected fuel assemblies and place in a safe condition. In this case, the applicable fuel assemblies would be removed from their respective casks and either reloaded into a TN-68 cask, or unloaded into the PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel pool.
InIn addition addition to  to the the proposed exemption request, EGC                     EGC has has considered considered the     thealternative alternative action action to to correct correct thethe historical historical condition, condition, as  as established establishedininTS      TS2.2,2.2,"Functional "Functional and  and Operational OperationalLimits  Limits Violations."
This action would require EGC to:
Violations/' Specifically, Specifically,ifif aaFunctional Functionaland    andOperational OperationalLimit  Limitisis violated, violated, TS 2.2.1 2.2.1 requires requires the    the licensee licensee to  to remove remove the    the affected affected fuel fuel assemblies assemblies and  and place place in in aa safe safe condition.
n Transport each individual cask from the ISFSI pad to the PBAPS Reactor Building trackway n
condition. In      In this this case, case,the theapplicable applicablefuel    fuel assemblies assemblieswould  wouldbe  beremoved removed from from    their   respective       casks casks and either reloaded into a TN-68 cask, or unloaded intothe and     either   reloaded         into   a TN-68     cask,   or unloaded     into     the PBAPS PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel pool.
Lift each cask with the Reactor Building crane to the PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel pool n
Unit  3  spent    fuel    pool.
Remove the casks' lids and applicable fuel assemblies Page 3 of 8 Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
This This action action would would require require EGC  EGC to:  to:
: b. Will not Endanger Life or Property or the Common Defense and Security EGC has verified that loading of the four spent nuclear fuel assemblies with cooling times less than the minimum required time, for the applicable durations, did not impact the shielding, confinement, and thermal design functions of the loaded TN-6a casks, as described in the Technical Analysis section below.
n*  Transport Transporteach  eachindividual individual cask   caskfromfromthe  theISFSI ISFSIpad padtotothe thePBAPS PBAPSReactor ReactorBuilding Building trackway trackway n*    Lift  each cask Lift each     cask with with the ReactorReactorBuilding Building crane crane to to the thePBAPS PBAPSUnit    Unit 33 spent spentfuelfuel pool pool n*    Remove Remove the    the casks' casks'lids  lids and and applicable applicable fuel fuel assemblies assemblies Page Page33of    of 8a
In addition, by Safety Evaluation Report (SER) dated October 30, 2007, the NRC approved Amendment 1 to CoC 1027. This amendment, in part, increased the TS average assembly burn-up limit and decreased the TS minimum allowable cooling time for all fuel types, except GE 7x7 assemblies. The revised minimum cooling time for 8x8, 9x9, and 1 Ox1 0 assemblies is seven years, which is specified in a new fuel selection flowchart that was added to TS 2.1.1 (Le., Figure 2.1.1-2, "Flowchart for Selection of 8x8, 9x9, and 1 Ox1 0 Fuel"). This figure also includes a mathematical function for determination of decay heat as a function of fuel burnup, cooling times, and initial fuel enrichment. In April 2013, EGC updated the four applicable TN-68 casks to the requirements of CoC 1027, Amendment 1, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 72.
Given that: 1) The loading of the four non-compliant spent nuclear fuel assemblies in 2001 did not impact the shielding, confinement, and thermal design functions of the loaded TN-68 casks; 2) The non-compliant condition was resolved within 86 days after loading; and 3) The TS-minimum-required cooling time has been subsequently reduced, by TS amendment, to less than the actual cooling times of the four assemblies, at time of loading, the proposed exemption does not compromise the ability of the four as-loaded TN-68 casks to safely store the four fuel assemblies. Therefore, the proposed exemption does not endanger life or property or the common defense and security.
: c. Otherwise in the Public Interest The proposed exemption is based on guidance provided in CoC 1027 Amendment 0, TS Bases 2.2.1. This states that non-compliant fuel assemblies may remain in the associated cask if this is determined to be a safe condition.
In addition to the proposed exemption request, EGC has considered the alternative action to correct the historical condition, as established in TS 2.2, "Functional and Operational Limits Violations/' Specifically, if a Functional and Operational Limit is violated, TS 2.2.1 requires the licensee to remove the affected fuel assemblies and place in a safe condition. In this case, the applicable fuel assemblies would be removed from their respective casks and either reloaded into a TN-68 cask, or unloaded into the PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel pool.
This action would require EGC to:
Transport each individual cask from the ISFSI pad to the PBAPS Reactor Building trackway Lift each cask with the Reactor Building crane to the PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel pool Remove the casks' lids and applicable fuel assemblies Page 3 of a


Attachment Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request        Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel         Fuel Storage Storage Installation Installation n*      Relocate and/or reload the assemblies    assemblies n*      Reinstall thethe lid lid n*    Remove the TN-68 casks from the                the spent spent fuel fuel pool pool
Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation n
* Process the reloaded casks to ensure cask integrity              integrity n*    Lower Lower the  the loaded caskscasks to  to the the Reactor ReactorBuilding Building trackway trackway n*    Transport each cask           back   to   the ISFSI cask back to the ISFSI pad. pad.
Relocate and/or reload the assemblies n
Based Based on  on historical historical loading loading performance, performance, EGC  EGC has hasdetermined determinedthat    that the the implementation implementation of this process process would would result result in in approximately approximately 300  300 mrem mrem of of personnel personnel radiation radiation exposure exposure per cask (i.e.,(Le., 1.2 1.2 person-person-rem rem total) total) and and a financial financial cost cost of approximately approximately $409,000  $409,000 per per cask cask (i.e.,
Reinstall the lid n
(i.e., $1.63
Remove the TN-68 casks from the spent fuel pool Process the reloaded casks to ensure cask integrity n
                        $1.63million million total),
Lower the loaded casks to the Reactor Building trackway n
total), asas well well as asthe thegeneration generationof    oflow-level low-levelradioactive radioactive waste  waste (LLRW) (i.e.,(Le., in        form of in the form       of radiologically radiologicallycontaminated contaminated consumables consumables and     andanti-anti-contamination           clothing     used   during contamination clothing used during the unloading      the unloading       and   reloading process). Inaddition, reloading       process).     In   addition, the process processwould wouldresult resultin inadditional additional opportunities opportunities for  for the occurrence occurrenceof        ofboth bothoff-normal off-normal events events and and design design basis basisaccidents, accidents,such suchasasa afuelfuelhandling handlingor  orcask caskdrop dropevent.event.
Transport each cask back to the ISFSI pad.
Since Since thethe four four assemblies assembliesare      arecurrently currentlyininaasafesafecondition conditionininthe  thefourfourindividual individual casks, casks, and in in full   compliance with full compliance        with thethe CoG CoC cooling cooling time time requirement, the       the integrity integrity of the casks casks and and fuel fuel will  not be will not   be impacted impacted by    by the the short period of non-compliance in 2001. Therefore,            Therefore, the the additional additional personnel personnel radiation radiation exposure, exposure,generation generationofofLLRW,  LLRW, and   andfinancial financial cost cost would not be in     in the the public public interest.
Based on historical loading performance, EGC has determined that the implementation of this process would result in approximately 300 mrem of personnel radiation exposure per cask (i.e., 1.2 person-rem total) and a financial cost of approximately $409,000 per cask (i.e., $1.63 million total), as well as the generation of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) (i.e., in the form of radiologically contaminated consumables and anti-contamination clothing used during the unloading and reloading process). In addition, the process would result in additional opportunities for the occurrence of both off-normal events and design basis accidents, such as a fuel handling or cask drop event.
interest.
Since the four assemblies are currently in a safe condition in the four individual casks, and in full compliance with the CoC cooling time requirement, the integrity of the casks and fuel will not be impacted by the short period of non-compliance in 2001. Therefore, the additional personnel radiation exposure, generation of LLRW, and financial cost would not be in the public interest.
: 4. Technical AnalysisAnalysis The TN-68 system provides     provides criticality        control,passive criticality control,     passive heat removal, confinement, confinement, and    and shielding, independent of           of  any   other   facility structures or components. The structural design facility structures     or components.         The     structural     design of the caskcask also also maintains maintains the   theintegrity integrity of of the fuel fuel during storage.
4.
storage.
Technical Analysis The TN-68 system provides criticality control, passive heat removal, confinement, and shielding, independent of any other facility structures or components. The structural design of the cask also maintains the integrity of the fuel during storage.
The cask cask design design requires requires certain certainlimits limits on spent spent fuel fuel parameters, parameters,including including fuel  fuel type, type, assembly assemblyweight,  weight, initial initial enrichment, maximum burnup,      burnup, minimum minimum coolingCOOling time, and     and physical physical condition condition to    to safely safely store store the the spent spent fuel. TheseTheselimitations limitations are areincluded included in  in the the thermal, thermal, structural, radiological, radiological, and and criticality     evaluations for criticality evaluations        for the the cask.
The cask design requires certain limits on spent fuel parameters, including fuel type, assembly weight, initial enrichment, maximum burnup, minimum cooling time, and physical condition to safely store the spent fuel. These limitations are included in the thermal, structural, radiological, and criticality evaluations for the cask.
cask.
The TN-68 is designed to store 68 boiling water reactor (BWR) type spent fuel assemblies.
The TN-68TN-68 is designed designed to    to store store 68 68boiling boiling water water reactor reactor (BWR)
CoC 1027 Amendment 0 establishes a maximum allowable initial lattice-average enrichment of 3.7 wt% U-235, a maximum bundle average burnup of 40 GWd/MTU, a maximum decay heat load of 0.312 kW/assembly, and a minimum cooling time of ten years, for all BWR fuel types.
(BWR) type spent   spent fuelfuel assemblies.
The allowable combinations of burnup, enrichment, and cooling time ensure that the thermal, shielding, and confinement design functions for a loaded fuel assembly are bounded by those evaluated in the Independent Fuel Storage Safety Analysis Report (IFSSAR) for the design fuel assembly. With respect to cooling time, the specified value of ten years ensures that the maximum decay heat load per assembly shall not exceed the TS 2.1.1.E.ii value of 0.312 kW (i.e., the bounding design value).
assemblies.
Page 4 of 8 Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Relocate and/or reload the assemblies Reinstall the lid Remove the TN-68 casks from the spent fuel pool Process the reloaded casks to ensure cask integrity Lower the loaded casks to the Reactor Building trackway Transport each cask back to the ISFSI pad.
CoC GoG 1027  1027 Amendment Amendment 00 establishes establishesaamaximum maximumallowable allowableinitial initial lattice-average lattice-averageenrichment enrichment of 3.7 wt% U-235,  U-235, a maximum bundle average         averageburnup burnupofof40  40GWd/MTU, GWdlMTU, aamaximum    maximumdecay  decay heat heat load load of of 0.312 0.312 kW/assembly, kW/assembly, and       andaaminimum minimumcoolingcoolingtimetimeof oftentenyears, years,for   forall allBWR BWRfuel fuel types.
Based on historical loading performance, EGC has determined that the implementation of this process would result in approximately 300 mrem of personnel radiation exposure per cask (Le., 1.2 person-rem total) and a financial cost of approximately $409,000 per cask (i.e., $1.63 million total), as well as the generation of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) (Le., in the form of radiologically contaminated consumables and anti-contamination clothing used during the unloading and reloading process). In addition, the process would result in additional opportunities for the occurrence of both off-normal events and design basis accidents, such as a fuel handling or cask drop event.
types.
Since the four assemblies are currently in a safe condition in the four individual casks, and in full compliance with the CoG cooling time requirement, the integrity of the casks and fuel will not be impacted by the short period of non-compliance in 2001. Therefore, the additional personnel radiation exposure, generation of LLRW, and financial cost would not be in the public interest.
The allowable combinations of                of burnup, burnup, enrichment, enrichment, and  and cooling cooling timetime ensure ensure that the thermal, shielding, and confinement design functions for                         for aa loaded fuel      assembly are fuel assembly         are bounded by    by those those evaluated evaluated in   in the the Independent IndependentFuel  Fuel Storage StorageSafety SafetyAnalysis Analysis ReportReport (IFSSAR)
: 4. Technical Analysis The TN-68 system provides criticality control, passive heat removal, confinement, and shielding, independent of any other facility structures or components. The structural design of the cask also maintains the integrity of the fuel during storage.
(IFSSAR) for     forthe the design design fuel fuel assembly.
The cask design requires certain limits on spent fuel parameters, including fuel type, assembly weight, initial enrichment, maximum burnup, minimum COOling time, and physical condition to safely store the spent fuel. These limitations are included in the thermal, structural, radiological, and criticality evaluations for the cask.
assembly. With  With respect respectto    tocooling cooling time, time, thethespecified specifiedvaluevalueof of ten years years ensures ensuresthat  thatthethemaximum maximum decay    decay heat heatloadload perper assembly assemblyshall  shall notnotexceed exceedthe  theTSTS 2.1.1.E.ii value of 0.312 kW          kW (i.e.,
The TN-68 is designed to store 68 boiling water reactor (BWR) type spent fuel assemblies.
(Le., the bounding design design value).
GoG 1027 Amendment 0 establishes a maximum allowable initial lattice-average enrichment of 3.7 wt% U-235, a maximum bundle average burnup of 40 GWdlMTU, a maximum decay heat load of 0.312 kW/assembly, and a minimum cooling time of ten years, for all BWR fuel types.
value).
The allowable combinations of burnup, enrichment, and cooling time ensure that the thermal, shielding, and confinement design functions for a loaded fuel assembly are bounded by those evaluated in the Independent Fuel Storage Safety Analysis Report (IFSSAR) for the design fuel assembly. With respect to cooling time, the specified value of ten years ensures that the maximum decay heat load per assembly shall not exceed the TS 2.1.1.E.ii value of 0.312 kW (Le., the bounding design value).
Page Page 44 of of 88
Page 4 of 8


Attachment 10 CFR CFR 72.772.7 Exemption Request  Request Peach Bottom Atomic   Atomic Power Power Station Station Independent Independent Spent   Spent FuelFuel Storage Storage Installation Installation Reactivity  parameters for Reactivity parameters       for the the four fourloaded loadedfuel fuelassemblies assemblies and and associated associated casks caskswere  werenot  not affected by the non-compliance period. The            The reactivity parameters of the fuel at the timeof reactivity    parameters        of the    fuel  at  the  time   of loading complied with       Technical Specification requirements.
Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Reactivity parameters for the four loaded fuel assemblies and associated casks were not affected by the non-compliance period. The reactivity parameters of the fuel at the time of loading complied with Technical Specification requirements.
with Technical                            requirements.
a.
: a. Thermal Design Function Upon discovery of     of the the non-compliance for      for the the four four spent spent nuclear fuel    fuel assemblies, EGC       EGG calculated the as-loaded          decay    heat  load    value  for  each    fuel  assembly, as-loaded decay heat load value for each fuel assembly, using the actual          using    the  actual assembly burnup, enrichment, enrichment, and  and cooling cooling times. This   This calculation calculation was was performed performed using  using the analytical analytical method in Regulatory Guide (RG)                     3.54, "Spent Fuel Heat Generation in an (RG) 3.54, Independent SpentSpent FuelFuel Storage StorageInstallation,"
Thermal Design Function Upon discovery of the non-compliance for the four spent nuclear fuel assemblies, EGC calculated the as-loaded decay heat load value for each fuel assembly, using the actual assembly burnup, enrichment, and cooling times. This calculation was performed using the analytical method in Regulatory Guide (RG) 3.54, "Spent Fuel Heat Generation in an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation," as well as the analytical method provided in CoC 1027 Amendment 1, TS 2.1.1, Figure 2.1.1-2. The actual decay heat value for each of the four assemblies was 0.201 kW using the RG 3.54 method and 0.194 kW using the CoC Amendment 1 method. Both values are bounded by the IFSSAR and TS design limit of 0.312 kW. Therefore, the short period of time in 2001 when the cooling time for each of the four assemblies was less than the minimum required did not impact the thermal design function of the casks.
Installation," as aswell well asasthetheanalytical analytical method methodprovidedprovided in GoG in CoC 1027 1027 Amendment Amendment 1,      1, TS TS 2.1.1, 2.1.1, Figure Figure 2.1.1-2.
: b. Radiation Shielding Design Function Shielding for the TN-68 cask is provided mainly by the cask body. For the neutron shielding, a borated polyester resin compound surrounds the cask body and a polypropylene disk covers the lid. Additional shielding is provided by the steel shell surrounding the resin layer and by the steel and aluminum structure of the fuel basket.
2.1.1-2. TheThe actual actual decay decay heat heatvalue value for for each ofof the four assemblies assemblies was  was 0.201 0.201 kW  kW using using the the RGRG 3.543.54 method method and  and 0.194 0.194kW  kW CoC Amendment 1 method. Both using the GoG                                          Both values values arearebounded boundedby      bythe theIFSSAR IFSSAR and    and TS design limit     of 0.312   kW. Therefore,       the short period     of limit of 0.312 kW. Therefore, the short period of time in 2001 when thetime  in  2001    when      the cooling time cooling  time for foreach each ofof the the four fourassemblies assemblies was less     lessthan thanthe theminimum minimum requiredrequired did  did not not thermal design function impact the thermal                 function of  of the the casks.
Geometric attenuation, enhanced by air and ground attenuation, provides additional dose reduction for distant locations at the restricted area and site boundaries.
: b. Radiation Shielding Design Function       Function Shielding for Shielding   for the the TN-68 TN-68 caskcask is provided mainly mainly by by the the cask body. For      For the neutron neutron shielding, shielding, a a borated     polyester     resin compound         surrounds surrounds the cask body and aa the  cask    body    and polypropylene disk covers the lid.
As part of the initial IFSSAR for CoC 1027, Amendment 0, a shielding evaluation was performed utilizing the source terms from a GE 7x7 fuel assembly with an initial bundle-average enrichment of 3.3 wt% and a total maximum bundle average burnup of 40 GWd/MTU. Given the design basis burnup and enrichment, this fuel assembly type is the most conservative based on the initial uranium loading. The shielding evaluation resulted in projected radiation levels that formed the basis for the dose rate limits in TS 5.2.3, "Cask Surface Dose Rate Evaluation Program."
polypropylene                            lid. Additional Additional shielding is provided by the steel shell                shell surrounding the resin layer surrounding                  layer and by by the the steel steel and andaluminum aluminum structure structureof  of the the fuel fuel basket.
The total gamma and neutron sources of the four non-compliant fuel assemblies were approximately 27% and 70% lower, respectively, than the design basis fuel sources.
basket.
Similarly, actual contact dose rates on the TN-68 cask, following loading of the four non-compliant fuel assemblies in 2001, were significantly lower than the TS 5.2.3 limits.
Geometric attenuation, enhanced  enhanced by   byairair and andground groundattenuation, attenuation,providesprovidesadditional additional dose reduction reduction for for distant distant locations locations at at the the restricted restricted area area and site site boundaries.
Therefore, the shielding design function will continue to limit external dose to levels bounded by the TN-68 IFSSAR.
boundaries.
c.
As part of the initial     IFSSAR for initial IFSSAR      for GoG CoC 1027, 1027, Amendment 0, aa shielding  shielding evaluation evaluation was    was performed utilizing       the source   terms   from     a GE 7x7   fuel   assembly utilizing the source terms from a GE 7x7 fuel assembly with an initial bundle-  with an   initial   bundle-average enrichment average    enrichment of    of 3.3 wt%
Confinement Design Function The confinement of radioactivity during the storage of spent fuel in the TN-68 cask system is ensured by the use of multiple confinement barriers and systems. These barriers are the fuel pellet matrix, the fuel cladding, and the cask.
wt% and aa total total maximum maximum bundle average    average burnup burnup of    of 40 40 GWd/MTU. Given GWd/MTU.         Given the the design design basis burnupburnup and  and enrichment, enrichment, this  this fuel fuel assembly assemblytype    type isis the most conservative based     basedon  onthe theinitial initial uranium uranium loading.
Page 5 of 8 Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Reactivity parameters for the four loaded fuel assemblies and associated casks were not affected by the non-compliance period. The reactivity parameters of the fuel at the time of loading complied with Technical Specification requirements.
loading. The Theshielding shieldingevaluation evaluation resulted in projected radiation levels that        that formed the the basis basisfor forthe thedose doserate ratelimits limitsinin TS 5.2.3, "Cask Surface Dose      Dose Rate RateEvaluation Evaluation Program."
: a. Thermal Design Function Upon discovery of the non-compliance for the four spent nuclear fuel assemblies, EGG calculated the as-loaded decay heat load value for each fuel assembly, using the actual assembly burnup, enrichment, and cooling times. This calculation was performed using the analytical method in Regulatory Guide (RG) 3.54, "Spent Fuel Heat Generation in an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation," as well as the analytical method provided in GoG 1027 Amendment 1, TS 2.1.1, Figure 2.1.1-2. The actual decay heat value for each of the four assemblies was 0.201 kW using the RG 3.54 method and 0.194 kW using the GoG Amendment 1 method. Both values are bounded by the I FSSAR and TS design limit of 0.312 kW. Therefore, the short period of time in 2001 when the cooling time for each of the four assemblies was less than the minimum required did not impact the thermal design function of the casks.
Program."
: b. Radiation Shielding Design Function Shielding for the TN-68 cask is provided mainly by the cask body. For the neutron shielding, a borated polyester resin compound surrounds the cask body and a polypropylene disk covers the lid. Additional shielding is provided by the steel shell surrounding the resin layer and by the steel and aluminum structure of the fuel basket.
The total total gamma and neutron neutron sources sourcesof    ofthe thefour fournon-compliant non-compliant fuel    fuel assemblies assemblies were    were approximately 27%
Geometric attenuation, enhanced by air and ground attenuation, provides additional dose reduction for distant locations at the restricted area and site boundaries.
approximately      27% andand 70% lower, lower, respectively, respectively, than than thethe design basis basis fuel fuel sources.
As part of the initial IFSSAR for GoG 1027, Amendment 0, a shielding evaluation was performed utilizing the source terms from a GE 7x7 fuel assembly with an initial bundle-average enrichment of 3.3 wt% and a total maximum bundle average burnup of 40 GWd/MTU. Given the design basis burnup and enrichment, this fuel assembly type is the most conservative based on the initial uranium loading. The shielding evaluation resulted in projected radiation levels that formed the basis for the dose rate limits in TS 5.2.3, "Cask Surface Dose Rate Evaluation Program."
sources.
The total gamma and neutron sources of the four non-compliant fuel assemblies were approximately 27% and 70% lower, respectively, than the design basis fuel sources.
Similarly,actual Similarly, actual contact contact dose dose rates ratesononthe theTN-68 TN-68cask, cask,following followingloading loadingof    ofthe thefour four non-non-fuel assemblies compliant fuel     assemblies inin 2001, 2001,wereweresignificantly significantly lower lower thanthanthetheTS TS5.2.3 5.2.3limits.
Similarly, actual contact dose rates on the TN-68 cask, following loading of the four non-compliant fuel assemblies in 2001, were significantly lower than the TS 5.2.3 limits.
limits.
Therefore, the shielding design function will continue to limit external dose to levels bounded by the TN-68 I FSSAR.
Therefore, the shielding shielding design designfunction function will will continue to limitlimit external dose dose to  to levels levels bounded by by the the TN-68 TN-68 IFSSAR.
: c. Confinement Design Function The confinement of radioactivity during the storage of spent fuel in the TN-68 cask system is ensured by the use of multiple confinement barriers and systems. These barriers are the fuel pellet matrix, the fuel cladding, and the cask.
IFSSAR.
Page 5 of 8  
: c. Confinement Design Function c.
The confinement of radioactivity            during the radioactivity during         the storage storage of of spent spentfuelfuel inin the theTN-68 TN-68 cask  cask system is ensured by    by the useuse ofof multiple      confinementbarriers multiple confinement             barriersand  andsystems.
systems. These These barriers are the fuelfuel pellet matrix, the fuel         cladding, and the cask.
fuel cladding,                  cask.
Page 55 of 8


Attachment Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 ExemptionExemption Request  Request Peach Bottom Bottom AtomicAtomic Power Power Station Station Independent Independent Spent   Spent Fuel Fuel Storage Storage Installation Installation The The long-term long-term integrity integrity of of the the stored fuel is dependent dependent on    on storage storageininaadry,  dry,inert inert environment and maintenance of adequate heat                             transfer     mechanisms.
Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation The long-term integrity of the stored fuel is dependent on storage in a dry, inert environment and maintenance of adequate heat transfer mechanisms. This environment is established by removing water from the cask cavity and backfilling the cavity with helium (i.e., an inert gas). Helium assists in heat removal and provides a non-reactive environment to protect fuel assemblies against fuel cladding degradation which might otherwise lead to gross rupture.
heat transfer mechanisms. This          This environment is    is established establishedby    byremoving removingwater  waterfromfrom thethe cask caskcavity cavityand andbackfilling backfilling the  the cavity withwith helium helium(Le., (i.e.,anan inert inertgas).
The thermal design function analyses for storage operations assume that the cask is filled with helium. As described above, the decay heat load for each of the four non-compliant fuel assemblies are bounded by the thermal analysis in the IFSSAR for a design fuel assembly. Therefore, the short period of time in 2001 when the cooling time for each of the four assemblies was less than the minimum required, did not impact the confinement design function of the casks.
gas). Helium        assists in Helium assists         in heat heat removal removal and    and provides provides aa non-reactive environment to protect fuel                       assemblies against fuel assemblies          againstfuelfuel cladding cladding degradation degradation which which might otherwise lead to            to gross grossrupture.
In addition, TS 3.1.1, "Cask Cavity Vacuum Drying," and TS 3.1.2, "Cask Helium Back Pressure," specify Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) and Surveillance Requirements (SRs) to ensure that the required helium environment within a TN-68 cask is correctly established during loading operations. TS 3.1.3, "Cask Helium Leak Rate" and TS 3.1.5, "Cask Interseal Pressure," establish LCOs and SRs to ensure that this environment is maintained during storage operations. When loaded in 2001, the four applicable TN-68 casks were in compliance with TS 3.1.1 and TS 3.1.2. Ongoing monitoring of the four casks, as required by TS 3.1.3 and TS 3.1.5, has confirmed continued compliance with TS requirements. This compliance ensures that the confinement design function was satisfied when initially loaded, and continues to be satisfied during storage operations.
rupture.
The thermal design function                 analyses for function analyses          for storage operations operations assumeassumethat    thatthethecask caskisis filled filled with helium. As described above, the decay heat load for each of the fournon-with  helium.      As    described      above,    the  decay    heat  load  for  each    of  the  four     non-compliant fuel         assemblies are fuel assemblies          arebounded boundedby      bythe thethermal thermalanalysis analYSisininthe  theIFSSAR IFSSARfor    for aa design design fuelfuel assembly.
assembly. Therefore, Therefore,the   theshort shortperiod periodofoftimetimeinin2001 2001whenwhenthe    thecooling coolingtime time for each each ofof the the four four assemblies assemblieswas    waslesslessthanthanthetheminimum minimumrequired, required,did   didnotnotimpact impactthe the confinement confinement designdesign function function of of the the casks.
casks.
In addition, TS 3.1.1, "Cask     "CaskCavity Cavity Vacuum Vacuum Drying," Drying," and TS  TS 3.1.2, 3.1.2, "Cask "CaskHeliumHelium BackBack Pressure,"    specify Pressure," specify LimitingLimiting    Conditions       for   Operation     (LCOs)     and   Surveillance Surveillance Requirements Requirements (SRs)    (SRs) to  to ensure ensurethat thatthetherequired requiredhelium heliumenvironment environmentwithin    within aa TN-68 TN-68 caskcask is is correctly established established during during loading operations. TS           TS3.1.3, 3.1.3,"Cask "CaskHeliumHelium Leak Leak Rate" Rate" and and TS TS 3.1.5, 3.1.5, "Cask "Cask Interseal Interseal Pressure,"
Pressure," establish establish LCOsLCOs and SRs   SRs to to ensure ensure that thatthis this environment environment is maintained maintained during storage storage operations.
operations. When When loaded loaded in   in 2001, 2001, the thefour four applicable applicable TN-68TN-68 caskscasks were were in in compliance compliance with    with TS 3.1.1 3.1.1 and TS 3.1.2. 3.1.2. Ongoing OngOing monitoring monitoring of    of the the four four casks, casks, as required required by  by TS 3.1.3 and   and TS TS 3.1.5, 3.1.5, hashasconfirmed confirmed continued continued compliance with TS requirements. This compliance ensuresthat compliance         with   TS   requirements.         This   compliance       ensures       thatthe the confinement confinement designdesignfunction function waswas satisfied satisfied when wheninitially initially loaded, and  and continues continuesto    tobe be satisfied satisfied during during storage storage operations.
operations.
5.
5.
: 5. Environmental Environmental Consideration Consideration EGC EGC has has evaluated evaluated the theenvironmental environmental impacts impacts of    of the proposed proposed exemption exemption request request and andhas has determined determined that that the the proposed proposedaction actionwillwill not not have have an an adverse adverseimpact impacttotothe  theenvironment.
Environmental Consideration EGC has evaluated the environmental impacts of the proposed exemption request and has determined that the proposed action will not have an adverse impact to the environment.
environment.
Therefore, the proposed action does not require any Federal permits, licenses, approvals, or other entitlements.
Therefore, Therefore, the the proposed proposed action  action does doesnot notrequire requireany  anyFederal Federalpermits, permits, licenses, licenses,approvals, approvals,or   or other other entitlements.
entitlements.
a.
a.
: a. Environmental Environmental Impacts  Impacts of   ofthe the Proposed ProposedAction    Action The The PBAPS PBAPS ISFSI ISFSI is   is aaradiologically radiologically controlled, Protected Area            Area with limitedlimited access, access, and and is is located located inside inside thethe EGCEGC Owner Owner Controlled Controlled Area. The       Thearea areaconsidered consideredfor      forpotential potential environmental environmental impact as         as aaresult resultof of this this exemption exemption request requestisis the thearea areaininand  and surrounding surrounding the theISFSI.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The PBAPS ISFSI is a radiologically controlled, Protected Area with limited access, and is located inside the EGC Owner Controlled Area. The area considered for potential environmental impact as a result of this exemption request is the area in and surrounding the ISFSI.
ISFSI.
The interaction of a loaded TN-68 with the environment is through the thermal, shielding, and confinement design functions for the cask system.
The The interaction interaction of of aaloaded loadedTN-68 TN-68with  with thetheenvironment environmentisisthroughthroughthe  thethermal, thermal,shielding, shielding, and   confinement       design   functions     for and confinement design functions for the cask system. the   cask   system.
Upon discovery of the CoC 1027 Amendment 0 non-compliance for the four spent nuclear fuel assemblies, EGC calculated the as-loaded decay heat load value for each fuel assembly, using the actual assembly burnup, enrichment, and cooling times. The Page 6of8 Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation The long-term integrity of the stored fuel is dependent on storage in a dry, inert environment and maintenance of adequate heat transfer mechanisms. This environment is established by removing water from the cask cavity and backfilling the cavity with helium (Le., an inert gas). Helium assists in heat removal and provides a non-reactive environment to protect fuel assemblies against fuel cladding degradation which might otherwise lead to gross rupture.
Upon Upon discovery discovery of  of the CoCCoC 1027 1027 Amendment Amendment 00 non-compliance non-compliancefor        for the the four four spent spent nuclear nuclear fuel fuel assemblies, assemblies, EGC    EGC calculated calculated the    the as-loaded as-loadeddecay  decayheat heatloadloadvalue valuefor foreach each fuel fuel assembly, assembly, using using thethe actual actual assembly assemblyburnup,  burnup, enrichment, enrichment, and   andcooling cooling times.
The thermal design function analyses for storage operations assume that the cask is filled with helium. As described above, the decay heat load for each of the four non-compliant fuel assemblies are bounded by the thermal analYSis in the IFSSAR for a design fuel assembly. Therefore, the short period of time in 2001 when the cooling time for each of the four assemblies was less than the minimum required, did not impact the confinement design function of the casks.
times. The The Page Page 6of8  6 of 8
In addition, TS 3.1.1, "Cask Cavity Vacuum Drying," and TS 3.1.2, "Cask Helium Back Pressure," specify Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) and Surveillance Requirements (SRs) to ensure that the required helium environment within a TN-68 cask is correctly established during loading operations. TS 3.1.3, "Cask Helium Leak Rate" and TS 3.1.5, "Cask Interseal Pressure," establish LCOs and SRs to ensure that this environment is maintained during storage operations. When loaded in 2001, the four applicable TN-68 casks were in compliance with TS 3.1.1 and TS 3.1.2. OngOing monitoring of the four casks, as required by TS 3.1.3 and TS 3.1.5, has confirmed continued compliance with TS requirements. This compliance ensures that the confinement design function was satisfied when initially loaded, and continues to be satisfied during storage operations.
: 5. Environmental Consideration EGC has evaluated the environmental impacts of the proposed exemption request and has determined that the proposed action will not have an adverse impact to the environment.
Therefore, the proposed action does not require any Federal permits, licenses, approvals, or other entitlements.
: a. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The PBAPS ISFSI is a radiologically controlled, Protected Area with limited access, and is located inside the EGC Owner Controlled Area. The area considered for potential environmental impact as a result of this exemption request is the area in and surrounding the ISFSI.
The interaction of a loaded TN-68 with the environment is through the thermal, shielding, and confinement design functions for the cask system.
Upon discovery of the CoC 1027 Amendment 0 non-compliance for the four spent nuclear fuel assemblies, EGC calculated the as-loaded decay heat load value for each fuel assembly, using the actual assembly burnup, enrichment, and cooling times. The Page 6 of 8  


Attachment 10 CFR 10  CFR 72.7 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Peach      Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation actual decay heat value for each of the four actual                                                  four assemblies assemblies was    was bounded bounded by   bythe the IFSSAR IFSSAR and TS design design limit limit of 0.312 0.312 kW,kW, with significant margin.
Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation actual decay heat value for each of the four assemblies was bounded by the IFSSAR and TS design limit of 0.312 kW, with significant margin.
Based on the actual radioactive radioactive source source terms terms forfor the the four four non-compliant non-compliant assemblies, assemblies, relative to relative  to the the design design source source term, term, asaswell well asasthe theinitial initial radiation radiation levels levels on onthe thefour four applicable TN-B8 TN-68 casks, relative         to design   limits,   the   shielding   design relative to design limits, the shielding design function will  function   will continue to limit limitexternal externaldosedose to levels bounded by          by the the TN-68 TN-B8 IFSSAR.
Based on the actual radioactive source terms for the four non-compliant assemblies, relative to the design source term, as well as the initial radiation levels on the four applicable TN-68 casks, relative to design limits, the shielding design function will continue to limit external dose to levels bounded by the TN-68 IFSSAR.
IFSSAR.
Finally, since the decay heat load of the four assemblies are bounded by the IFSSAR design thermal analysis, the confinement design functions of the fuel cladding and the TN-68 structure were not adversely impacted by the as-loaded configurations.
Finally,since Finally,  sincethe the decay decay heat load of the four     four assemblies assemblies are     arebounded boundedby    bythe theIFSSAR I FSSAR design thermal analysis, the       the confinement confinement design design functions functions of  of the fuel fuel cladding and the  the TN-68 structure TN-B8    structure were were not not adversely adversely impacted by the as-loaded     as-loaded configurations.
In that compliance with TS 2.1.1, Table 2.1.1-1 for all four non-compliant assemblies was achieved on September 14, 2001, EGC has concluded that all TN-68 design functions impacting the environment are, and will continue to be bounded by the IFSSAR evaluations.
configurations.
EGC has also determined that there are no gaseous, liquid or solid effluents (radiological or non-radiological), radiological exposures (worker or member of the public) or land disturbances associated with the proposed action. Therefore, approval of the requested exemption to allow the fuel assemblies to remain as loaded has no impact on the environment.
In that In  that compliance compliance with   with TSTS 2.1.1, 2.1.1, Table Table 2.1.1-1 2.1.1-1 forfor all all four four non-compliant non-compliantassemblies assemblies was achieved on SeptemberSeptember 14, 2001, EGC has concluded that all TN-B8 design 14, 2001,   EGC     has   concluded       that all TN-68    design functions impacting functions    impacting the  the environment are, and      and will     continue to be bounded will continue                boundedby  bythe theIFSSAR IFSSAR evaluations.
: b. Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided Should the Exemption be Approved As noted previously, there are no environmental impacts associated with approval of this exemption. Therefore, there are no adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the exemption request be approved.
evaluations.
: c. Alternative to the Proposed Action In addition to the proposed exemption request, EGC has considered the alternative action to correct the historical condition, as established in TS 2.2, "Functional and Operational Limits Violations." Specifically, if a Functional and Operational Limit is violated, TS 2.2.1 requires the licensee to remove the affected fuel assemblies and place in a safe condition. In this case, the applicable fuel assemblies would be removed from their respective casks and either reloaded into a TN-68 cask, or unloaded into a PBAPS spent fuel pool. This would involve the following steps:
EGC has also determined that there are EGC                                                are nono gaseous, gaseous,liquid liquid ororsolid solid effluents effluents (radiological or (radiological      or non-radiological),
n Retrieve each affected TN-68 from the ISFSI Pad and transport to the PBAPS Unit 3 Reactor Building trackway n
non-radiological), radiological radiologicalexposures exposures (worker or member    member of of the public)    or  land  disturbances public) or land disturbances           associated     with with   the   proposed     action. Therefore, Therefore, approval of approval    of the the requested requested exemption to allow     allowthe the fuel fuelassemblies assemblies to remain remain as loaded has nono impact impact on the environment.
Lift each cask with the Reactor Building crane to the PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel pool n
environment.
Remove the casks' lids and applicable fuel assemblies n
: b. Adverse Environmental Environmental Effects  Effects Which Which Cannot Cannot be    be Avoided AvoidedShouldShouldthe  theExemption Exemption be Approved As noted previously, previously, therethere are no environmental environmental impacts associated   associatedwith  with approval approval of  of this this exemption. Therefore, there are              no  adverse    environmental          effects are no adverse environmental effects which cannot be    which  cannot    be avoided should the exemption request be               be approved.
Relocate and/or reload the assemblies n
approved.
Reinstall the lid n
: c. Alternative to the ProposedProposed Action Action In addition to In addition    to the the proposed proposed exemption request, EGC            EGC has hasconsidered consideredthe  thealternative alternative action to correct the historical           condition, historical condition,        as established established in TS 2.2, "Functional and in TS   2.2,   "Functional     and Operational LimitsLimits Violations."
Remove the TN-68 casks from the spent fuel pool n
Violations." Specifically, Specifically, if a Functional and        and Operational OperationalLimitLimit isis violated, violated, TSTS 2.2.1 2.2.1 requires the licensee to remove the affected fuel                        assemblies and fuel assemblies     and place in a safe condition.
Process the reloaded casks to ensure cask integrity Page 7 of 8 Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation actual decay heat value for each of the four assemblies was bounded by the IFSSAR and TS design limit of 0.312 kW, with significant margin.
condition. In In this this case, case, thetheapplicable applicable fuel  fuel assemblies assemblieswould  would be beremoved removed from   their respective from their    respective casks and   and either either reloaded reloadedinto  into aaTN-68 TN-68 cask, cask, or orunloaded unloadedintointoaa PBAPS spentspent fuel fuel pool.
Based on the actual radioactive source terms for the four non-compliant assemblies, relative to the design source term, as well as the initial radiation levels on the four applicable TN-B8 casks, relative to design limits, the shielding design function will continue to limit external dose to levels bounded by the TN-B8 IFSSAR.
pool. This Thiswould wouldinvolve involvethe thefollowing following steps:
Finally, since the decay heat load of the four assemblies are bounded by the I FSSAR design thermal analysis, the confinement design functions of the fuel cladding and the TN-B8 structure were not adversely impacted by the as-loaded configurations.
steps:
In that compliance with TS 2.1.1, Table 2.1.1-1 for all four non-compliant assemblies was achieved on September 14, 2001, EGC has concluded that all TN-B8 design functions impacting the environment are, and will continue to be bounded by the I FSSAR evaluations.
n* Retrieve each each affected affected TN-68 TN-68 from the ISFSI Pad         Pad andandtransport transporttotothe thePBAPS PBAPSUnit  Unit33 Reactor   Building     trackway Reactor Building trackway n* Lift each cask with Lift each            with the Reactor Reactor Building Building crane crane to  to the the PBAPS PBAPSUnit  Unit 33 spent spentfuel fuelpool pool n* Remove the    the casks' casks' lids lids and and applicable applicable fuel assemblies assemblies n* Relocate Relocate and/or and/or reload reload thethe assemblies assemblies n* Reinstall    the Reinstall the lid lid n* Remove the TN-68  TN-B8 casks casks from from the the spent spentfuel fuel pool pool n* Process the reloaded casks to ensure       ensure cask cask integrity integrity Page 7 of   of 88
EGC has also determined that there are no gaseous, liquid or solid effluents (radiological or non-radiological), radiological exposures (worker or member of the public) or land disturbances associated with the proposed action. Therefore, approval of the requested exemption to allow the fuel assemblies to remain as loaded has no impact on the environment.
: b. Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided Should the Exemption be Approved As noted previously, there are no environmental impacts associated with approval of this exemption. Therefore, there are no adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the exemption request be approved.
: c. Alternative to the Proposed Action In addition to the proposed exemption request, EGC has considered the alternative action to correct the historical condition, as established in TS 2.2, "Functional and Operational Limits Violations." Specifically, if a Functional and Operational Limit is violated, TS 2.2.1 requires the licensee to remove the affected fuel assemblies and place in a safe condition. In this case, the applicable fuel assemblies would be removed from their respective casks and either reloaded into a TN-68 cask, or unloaded into a PBAPS spent fuel pool. This would involve the following steps:
* Retrieve each affected TN-68 from the ISFSI Pad and transport to the PBAPS Unit 3 Reactor Building trackway
* Lift each cask with the Reactor Building crane to the PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel pool
* Remove the casks' lids and applicable fuel assemblies
* Relocate and/or reload the assemblies
* Reinstall the lid
* Remove the TN-B8 casks from the spent fuel pool
* Process the reloaded casks to ensure cask integrity Page 7 of 8


Attachment 10 CFR 10 CFR      72.7 Exemption Request Peach Peach    Bottom     Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Independent
Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation n
  *n Lower Lowerthe  the loaded loaded casks casks toto the the Reactor ReactorBuilding Building trackway trackway
Lower the loaded casks to the Reactor Building trackway n
  *n Transport Transport eacheach cask back to the ISFSI    ISFSI pad.
Transport each cask back to the ISFSI pad.
This alternative This    alternativewould wouldrestore restorethe theaffected affected as-loaded as-loaded TN-68 casks   casksto  tocompliance compliancewith  with CoC CoC    1027.
This alternative would restore the affected as-loaded TN-68 casks to compliance with CoC 1027.
: d. Environmental Effects of
: d. Environmental Effects of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action The environmental impacts of the alternative to the proposed action would result in both real and potential radiological impacts. Based on historical loading performance, EGC has determined that the implementation of this process would result in approximately 300 mrem of personnel radiation exposure per cask (i.e., 1.2 person -rem total) and a financial cost of approximately $409,000 per cask (i.e., $1.63 million total), as well as the generation of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) (i.e., in the form of radiologically contaminated consumables and anti-contamination clothing used during the unloading and reloading process). In addition, the process would result in additional opportunities for the occurrence of both off-normal events and design basis accidents, such as a fuel handling or cask drop event.
: d.                                  of the Alternatives Alternatives to    to the the Proposed Proposed Action Action The environmental impacts of         of the the alternative alternative to  to the the proposed proposedaction actionwould wouldresult resultininboth both real and real  and potential potential radiological radiological impacts.
e.
impacts. Based Basedon    onhistorical historicalloading loadingperformance, performance,EGC    EGC has determined determined thatthat the the implementation implementation of    of this this process processwould wouldresult resultininapproximately approximately 300 mrem of personnel radiation             exposure       per   cask   (i.e.,
Conclusion and Status of Compliance As a result of the environmental assessment, EGC concludes that the proposed action, which will allow EGC to maintain the four fuel assemblies in their current storage configuration, is in the public interest in that it avoids the adverse environmental, radiological, and financial effects associated with the alternative to the proposed action.
radiation exposure per cask (Le., 1.2 person-rem1.2  person    -rem total) total) and and a financial cost financial    cost of approximately $409,000$409,000 per per cask cask (i.e.,
Page 8 of 8 Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
(Le., $1.63
* Lower the loaded casks to the Reactor Building trackway
                                                                                $1.63million million total),   as well total), as  well as the generation of low-level radioactive radioactive waste (LLRW) (LLRW) (Le., (i.e., in in the form form of radiologically contaminated consumables consumablesand    andanti-contamination anti-contamination clothing clothing used usedduring during the theunloading unloading and reloading process).
* Transport each cask back to the ISFSI pad.
process).InInaddition, addition,thetheprocess processwould wouldresult resultininadditional additionalopportunities opportunities for the for  the occurrence occurrence of  of both both off-normal off-normaleventseventsand  anddesign design basisbasis accidents, suchsuch asasaafuel fuel handling    or cask handling or cask       drop   event.
This alternative would restore the affected as-loaded TN-68 casks to compliance with CoC 1027.
: e. Conclusion and Status of
: d. Environmental Effects of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action The environmental impacts of the alternative to the proposed action would result in both real and potential radiological impacts. Based on historical loading performance, EGC has determined that the implementation of this process would result in approximately 300 mrem of personnel radiation exposure per cask (Le., 1.2 person-rem total) and a financial cost of approximately $409,000 per cask (Le., $1.63 million total), as well as the generation of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) (Le., in the form of radiologically contaminated consumables and anti-contamination clothing used during the unloading and reloading process). In addition, the process would result in additional opportunities for the occurrence of both off-normal events and design basis accidents, such as a fuel handling or cask drop event.
: e.                                    of Compliance Compliance As a result of the environmental As                      environmental assessment, assessment, EGC    EGC concludes concludesthat  thatthe theproposed proposedaction, action, which will which    willallow allowEGC EGCtotomaintain maintainthethefour fourfuel fuelassemblies assemblies in their current storage storage configuration, is configuration,    is in in the the public public interest interest in in that that itit avoids avoids thethe adverse adverse environmental, environmental, radiological,    and  financial  effects  associated radiological, and financial effects associated with         with  the   alternative alternative theto the proposed proposedaction.
: e. Conclusion and Status of Compliance As a result of the environmental assessment, EGC concludes that the proposed action, which will allow EGC to maintain the four fuel assemblies in their current storage configuration, is in the public interest in that it avoids the adverse environmental, radiological, and financial effects associated with the alternative to the proposed action.
action.
Page 8 of 8}}
Page Page 88of  of 88}}

Latest revision as of 08:18, 11 January 2025

Exemption Request for Transnuclear TN-68 Casks Loaded with Fuel Bundles with Incorrect Cooling Times
ML13144A219
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/23/2013
From: Simpson P
Exelon Generation Co
To:
Document Control Desk, NRC/NMSS/SFST
References
RS-13-140
Download: ML13144A219 (10)


Text

10 CFR 72.7 RS-1 3-140 May 23, 2013 ATTN: Document Control Desk Director, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR -44 and DPR-56 NRC Docket Nos. 50-277, 50-278, and 72-29

Subject:

Exemption Request for Transnuclear TN-68 Casks Loaded with Fuel Bundles with Incorrect Cooling Times In accordance with 10 CFR 72.7, "Specific exemptions," Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC) is requesting NRC approval of a one-time exemption for the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) from the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3) and (b)(11). Specifically, the exemption request addresses the non-compliance of four spent fuel assemblies with the terms and conditions of the Transnuclear, Inc. (TN) Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Number 1027, Amendment 0, at the time of loading.

The regulations require, in part, compliance to the terms and conditions of CoC 1027. Contrary to this requirement, in June and July 2001, four PBAPS Unit 3 fuel assemblies with cooling times less than the minimum cooling time specified in CoC 1027, Amendment 0, Appendix A, Technical Specification (TS) 2.1.1, Table 2.1.1-1, "Minimum Acceptable Cooling Time as a Function of Max. Burnup and Min. Initial Enrichment," were loaded into four TN -68 casks (i.e.,

one assembly per cask). Specifically, the four fuel assemblies had been cooled for 9.8 years instead of the required period of 10 years.

EGC identified this condition on January 24, 2013, during a review of ISFSI fuel characterization data. Upon discovery, EGC verified that the actual heat load of each fuel bundle, at the time of loading, was less than the limit specified in TS 2.1.1.E.ii. The decay heat of the assemblies has continued to decrease since their initial loading in June and July 2001. As of September 14, 2001, the four assemblies were in compliance with the TS 2.2.1, Table 2.1.1-1 Cooling Time requirement.

RS-13-140 May 23,2013 A TIN: Document Control Desk Director, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-44 and DPR-56 NRC Docket Nos. 50-277. 50-278. and 72-29 10 CFR 72.7

Subject:

Exemption Request for Transnuclear TN-68 Casks Loaded with Fuel Bundles with Incorrect Cooling Times In accordance with 10 CFR 72.7, "Specific exemptions," Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC) is requesting NRC approval of a one-time exemption for the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) from the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3) and (b)(11). Specifically, the exemption request addresses the non-compliance of four spent fuel assemblies with the terms and conditions of the Transnuclear, Inc. (TN) Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Number 1027, Amendment 0, at the time of loading.

The regulations require, in part, compliance to the terms and conditions of CoC 1027. Contrary to this requirement, in June and July 2001, four PBAPS Unit 3 fuel assemblies with cooling times less than the minimum cooling time specified in CoC 1027, Amendment 0, Appendix A, Technical Specification (TS) 2.1.1, Table 2.1.1-1, "Minimum Acceptable Cooling Time as a Function of Max. Burnup and Min. Initial Enrichment," were loaded into four TN-68 casks (Le.,

one assembly per cask). Specifically, the four fuel assemblies had been cooled for 9.8 years instead of the required period of 10 years.

EGC identified this condition on January 24, 2013, during a review of ISFSI fuel characterization data. Upon discovery, EGC verified that the actual heat load of each fuel bundle, at the time of loading, was less than the limit specified in TS 2.1.1. E.ii. The decay heat of the assemblies has continued to decrease since their initial loading in June and July 2001. As of September 14, 2001, the four assemblies were in compliance with the TS 2.2.1, Table 2.1.1-1 Cooling Time requirement.

May 23, 2013 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 EGC also conducted an extent of condition review for all fuel assemblies currently stored within the PBAPS ISFSI. All other loaded fuel assemblies were in compliance with the TS Cooling Time requirement, at the time of loading.

The attachment to this letter describes the need and justification for the issuance of an exemption, as well as an environmental assessment of the proposed action.

There are no regulatory commitments in this submittal.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. John L. Schrage at (630) 657-2821.

Respectfully,

Attachment:

10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation cc:

NRC Regional Administrator - Region I May 23, 2013 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 EGC also conducted an extent of condition review for all fuel assemblies currently stored within the PBAPS ISFSI. All other loaded fuel assemblies were in compliance with the TS Cooling Time requirement, at the time of loading.

The attachment to this letter describes the need and justification for the issuance of an exemption, as well as an environmental assessment of the proposed action.

There are no regulatory commitments in this submittal.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. John L. Schrage at (630) 657-2821.

Respectfully, Patrick R. Simpson Manager - Licensing

Attachment:

10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation cc:

NRC Regional Administrator - Region I

Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation

===1.

Background===

The Transnuclear, Inc., (TN) TN-68 storage system is designed to store 68 spent fuel assemblies for independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) deployment. The system is listed in 10 CFR 72.214 as Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Number 1027. This system is currently installed and in use at the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS) under a 10 CFR Part 72 general license.

During a January 2013 internal review of historical ISFSI fuel characterization for PBAPS, Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC) identified that in June and July 2001, four PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel assemblies with cooling times less than the minimum cooling time specified in CoC 1027, Amendment 0, Appendix A, Technical Specification (TS) 2.1.1, Table 2.1.1-1, "Minimum Acceptable Cooling Time as a Function of Max. Burnup and Min. Initial Enrichment," were loaded into four TN-68 casks (i.e., one assembly per cask).

Specifically, the four spent fuel assemblies had been cooled for approximately 9.8 years instead of the required 10 years that is specified in TS Table 2.1.1-1. Upon discovery of the TS non-compliance, EGC verified that the actual heat load of each fuel bundle, at the time of loading, was less than the limit specified in TS 2.1.1.E.ii. The decay heat of the assemblies has continued to decrease since their initial loading in June and July 2001. As of September 14, 2001, the four assemblies fully complied with the TS 2.2.1, Table 2.1.1-1 cooling time requirement.

EGC also conducted an extent of condition review for all fuel assemblies currently stored within the PBAPS ISFSI. All other loaded fuel assemblies were in compliance with the TS cooling time requirement, at the time of loading.

As required by TS 2.2.2, EGC notified the NRC Operations Center within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of discovery of the TS non-compliance (i.e., ENS notification 48698). Similarly, as required by TS 2.2.3, EGC provided a 30-day special report to the NRC on February 22, 2013. This special report described the cause of the TS non-compliance and the actions taken to restore compliance and prevent recurrence. EGC also indicated in the special report that a one-time exemption request would be submitted to obtain NRC approval for the period of time that the four spent fuel assemblies were non-compliant with the TS-required cooling time.

2. Request for Exemption In accordance with 10 CFR 72.7, "Specific exemptions," EGC is requesting NRC approval of a one-time exemption for the PBAPS, Units 2 and 3 ISFSI from the following requirements of 10 CFR 72.212, due to a non-compliance with the terms and conditions of CoC 1027.

10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), which states the general licensee must "[e]nsure that each cask used by the general licensee conforms to the terms, conditions, and specifications of a CoC or an amended CoC listed in § 72.214" n

The portion of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(11) which states that " [t]he licensee shall comply with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC...."

Page 1 of 8

1. Background

Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation The Transnuclear, Inc., (TN) TN-68 storage system is designed to store 68 spent fuel assemblies for independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) deployment. The system is listed in 10 CFR 72.214 as Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Number 1027. This system is currently installed and in use at the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS) under a 10 CFR Part 72 general license.

During a January 2013 internal review of historical ISFSI fuel characterization for PBAPS, Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGG) identified that in June and July 2001, four PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel assemblies with cooling times less than the minimum cooling time specified in CoC 1027, Amendment 0, Appendix A, Technical Specification (TS) 2.1.1, Table 2.1.1-1, "Minimum Acceptable Cooling Time as a Function of Max. Burnup and Min. Initial Enrichment," were loaded into four TN-68 casks (Le., one assembly per cask).

Specifically, the four spent fuel assemblies had been cooled for approximately 9.8 years instead of the required 10 years that is specified in TS Table 2.1.1-1. Upon discovery of the TS non-compliance, EGC verified that the actual heat load of each fuel bundle, at the time of loading, was less than the limit specified in TS 2.1.1.E.ii. The decay heat of the assemblies has continued to decrease since their initial loading in June and July 2001. As of September 14, 2001, the four assemblies fully complied with the TS 2.2.1, Table 2.1.1-1 cooling time requirement.

EGC also conducted an extent of condition review for all fuel assemblies currently stored within the PBAPS ISFSI. All other loaded fuel assemblies were in compliance with the TS cooling time requirement, at the time of loading.

As required by TS 2.2.2, EGC notified the NRC Operations Center within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of discovery of the TS non-compliance (Le., ENS notification 48698). Similarly, as required by TS 2.2.3, EGC provided a 30-day special report to the NRC on February 22, 2013. This special report described the cause of the TS non-compliance and the actions taken to restore compliance and prevent recurrence. EGC also indicated in the special report that a one-time exemption request would be submitted to obtain NRC approval for the period of time that the four spent fuel assemblies were non-compliant with the TS-required cooling time.

2. Request for Exemption In accordance with 10 CFR 72.7, "Specific exemptions," EGC is requesting NRC approval of a one-time exemption for the PBAPS, Units 2 and 3 ISFSI from the following requirements of 10 CFR 72.212, due to a non-compliance with the terms and conditions of CoC 1027.

10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), which states the general licensee must "[e]nsure that each cask used by the general licensee conforms to the terms, conditions, and specifications of a CoC or an amended CoC listed in § 72.214" The portion of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(11) which states that" [t]he licensee shall comply with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC.... "

Page 1 of 8

Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Specifically, four spent fuel assemblies were non-compliant, at the time of loading, with the cooling time requirement in CoC 1027 Amendment 0, Appendix A, TS 2.2.1 for durations ranging from 58 to 86 days. As of September 14, 2001, all four spent nuclear fuel assemblies were in compliance with the terms and conditions of CoC 1027.

These assemblies, the associated cask numbers, maximum burnup values, load dates, and CoC non-compliance durations are listed in the Table below. All four are GE6 8x8 type assemblies, with a uranium content of 0.182 MTU, a minimum initial bundle average enrichment of 2.99%, and a last at-power date of September 14, 1991.

Assembly No.

Cask No.

Maximum Burnup (GWd/MTU)

Load Date CoC Non-compliance Duration LJW874 TN-68-05 29.582 19-Jun-2001 86 days LJW875 TN-68-06 29.577 26-Jun-2001 79 days LJW882 TN-68-07 29.578 10-Jul-2001 65 days LJW867 TN-68-08 29.580 17-Jul-2001 58 days 3.

Basis for Approval of Exemption Request In accordance with 10 CFR 72.7, the NRC may, upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant such exemptions from the requirements of the regulations in this part as it determines are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the public interest.

a.

Authorized by Law This exemption would allow EGC to continue to store four spent nuclear fuel assemblies at the PBAPS ISFSI which were, at the time of loading in June and July 2001, in non -

compliance with the minimum cooling time requirement specified in CoC 1027, Amendment 0, Appendix A, TS 2.2.1, Table 2.1.1-1. All four spent nuclear fuel assemblies currently comply with all TS requirements.

The NRC issued 10 CFR 72.7 under the authority granted to it under Section 133 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 10153. Section 72.7 allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 72. Granting the proposed exemption provides adequate protection to public health and safety, and the environment. As described below, the proposed exemption will not endanger life or property, or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest.

Therefore, the exemption is authorized by law.

Page 2 of 8 Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Insta"ation Specifically, four spent fuel assemblies were non-compliant, at the time of loading, with the cooling time requirement in CoC 1027 Amendment 0, Appendix A, TS 2.2.1 for durations ranging from 58 to 86 days. As of September 14, 2001, all four spent nuclear fuel assemblies were in compliance with the terms and conditions of CoC 1027.

These assemblies, the associated cask numbers, maximum burn up values, load dates, and CoC non-compliance durations are listed in the Table below. All four are GE6 8x8 type assemblies, with a uranium content of 0.182 MTU, a minimum initial bundle average enrichment of 2.99%, and a last at-power date of September 14, 1991.

Assembly Cask No. I Maximum Load Date CoC No.

I Burnup Non-compliance

  • (GWdlMTU)

Duration LJW874 TN-68-05 29.582 19-Jun-2001 86 days WW875 TN-68-06 29.577 26-Jun-2001 79 days LJW882 TN-68-07 29.578 10-Jul-2001 65 days WW867 TN-68-08 29.580 17 -Jul-2001 58 days

3. Basis for Approval of Exemption Request In accordance with 10 CFR 72.7, the NRC may, upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant such exemptions from the requirements of the regulations in this part as it determines are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the public interest.
a. Authorized by Law This exemption would allow EGC to continue to store four spent nuclear fuel assemblies at the PBAPS ISFSI which were, at the time of loading in June and July 2001, in non-compliance with the minimum cooling time requirement specified in CoC 1027, Amendment 0, Appendix A, TS 2.2.1, Table 2.1.1-1. All four spent nuclear fuel assemblies currently comply with all TS requirements.

The NRC issued 10 CFR 72.7 under the authority granted to it under Section 133 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 10153. Section 72.7 allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 72. Granting the proposed exemption provides adequate protection to public health and safety, and the environment. As described below, the proposed exemption will not endanger life or property, or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest.

Therefore, the exemption is authorized by law.

Page 2 of 8

Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation b.

Will not Endanger Life or Property or the Common Defense and Security EGC has verified that loading of the four spent nuclear fuel assemblies with cooling times less than the minimum required time, for the applicable durations, did not impact the shielding, confinement, and thermal design functions of the loaded TN-68 casks, as described in the Technical Analysis section below.

In addition, by Safety Evaluation Report (SER) dated October 30, 2007, the NRC approved Amendment 1 to CoC 1027. This amendment, in part, increased the TS average assembly burn-up limit and decreased the TS minimum allowable cooling time for all fuel types, except GE 7x7 assemblies. The revised minimum cooling time for 8x8, 9x9, and 10x10 assemblies is seven years, which is specified in a new fuel selection flowchart that was added to TS 2.1.1 (i.e., Figure 2.1.1-2, "Flowchart for Selection of 8x8, 9x9, and 10x10 Fuel"). This figure also includes a mathematical function for determination of decay heat as a function of fuel burnup, cooling times, and initial fuel enrichment. In April 2013, EGC updated the four applicable TN-68 casks to the requirements of CoC 1027, Amendment 1, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 72.

Given that: 1) The loading of the four non-compliant spent nuclear fuel assemblies in 2001 did not impact the shielding, confinement, and thermal design functions of the loaded TN-68 casks; 2) The non-compliant condition was resolved within 86 days after loading; and 3) The TS-minimum-required cooling time has been subsequently reduced, by TS amendment, to less than the actual cooling times of the four assemblies, at time of loading, the proposed exemption does not compromise the ability of the four as -

loaded TN-68 casks to safely store the four fuel assemblies. Therefore, the proposed exemption does not endanger life or property or the common defense and security.

c.

Otherwise in the Public Interest The proposed exemption is based on guidance provided in CoC 1027 Amendment 0, TS Bases 2.2.1. This states that non-compliant fuel assemblies may remain in the associated cask if this is determined to be a safe condition.

In addition to the proposed exemption request, EGC has considered the alternative action to correct the historical condition, as established in TS 2.2, "Functional and Operational Limits Violations." Specifically, if a Functional and Operational Limit is violated, TS 2.2.1 requires the licensee to remove the affected fuel assemblies and place in a safe condition. In this case, the applicable fuel assemblies would be removed from their respective casks and either reloaded into a TN-68 cask, or unloaded into the PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel pool.

This action would require EGC to:

n Transport each individual cask from the ISFSI pad to the PBAPS Reactor Building trackway n

Lift each cask with the Reactor Building crane to the PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel pool n

Remove the casks' lids and applicable fuel assemblies Page 3 of 8 Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation

b. Will not Endanger Life or Property or the Common Defense and Security EGC has verified that loading of the four spent nuclear fuel assemblies with cooling times less than the minimum required time, for the applicable durations, did not impact the shielding, confinement, and thermal design functions of the loaded TN-6a casks, as described in the Technical Analysis section below.

In addition, by Safety Evaluation Report (SER) dated October 30, 2007, the NRC approved Amendment 1 to CoC 1027. This amendment, in part, increased the TS average assembly burn-up limit and decreased the TS minimum allowable cooling time for all fuel types, except GE 7x7 assemblies. The revised minimum cooling time for 8x8, 9x9, and 1 Ox1 0 assemblies is seven years, which is specified in a new fuel selection flowchart that was added to TS 2.1.1 (Le., Figure 2.1.1-2, "Flowchart for Selection of 8x8, 9x9, and 1 Ox1 0 Fuel"). This figure also includes a mathematical function for determination of decay heat as a function of fuel burnup, cooling times, and initial fuel enrichment. In April 2013, EGC updated the four applicable TN-68 casks to the requirements of CoC 1027, Amendment 1, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 72.

Given that: 1) The loading of the four non-compliant spent nuclear fuel assemblies in 2001 did not impact the shielding, confinement, and thermal design functions of the loaded TN-68 casks; 2) The non-compliant condition was resolved within 86 days after loading; and 3) The TS-minimum-required cooling time has been subsequently reduced, by TS amendment, to less than the actual cooling times of the four assemblies, at time of loading, the proposed exemption does not compromise the ability of the four as-loaded TN-68 casks to safely store the four fuel assemblies. Therefore, the proposed exemption does not endanger life or property or the common defense and security.

c. Otherwise in the Public Interest The proposed exemption is based on guidance provided in CoC 1027 Amendment 0, TS Bases 2.2.1. This states that non-compliant fuel assemblies may remain in the associated cask if this is determined to be a safe condition.

In addition to the proposed exemption request, EGC has considered the alternative action to correct the historical condition, as established in TS 2.2, "Functional and Operational Limits Violations/' Specifically, if a Functional and Operational Limit is violated, TS 2.2.1 requires the licensee to remove the affected fuel assemblies and place in a safe condition. In this case, the applicable fuel assemblies would be removed from their respective casks and either reloaded into a TN-68 cask, or unloaded into the PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel pool.

This action would require EGC to:

Transport each individual cask from the ISFSI pad to the PBAPS Reactor Building trackway Lift each cask with the Reactor Building crane to the PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel pool Remove the casks' lids and applicable fuel assemblies Page 3 of a

Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation n

Relocate and/or reload the assemblies n

Reinstall the lid n

Remove the TN-68 casks from the spent fuel pool Process the reloaded casks to ensure cask integrity n

Lower the loaded casks to the Reactor Building trackway n

Transport each cask back to the ISFSI pad.

Based on historical loading performance, EGC has determined that the implementation of this process would result in approximately 300 mrem of personnel radiation exposure per cask (i.e., 1.2 person-rem total) and a financial cost of approximately $409,000 per cask (i.e., $1.63 million total), as well as the generation of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) (i.e., in the form of radiologically contaminated consumables and anti-contamination clothing used during the unloading and reloading process). In addition, the process would result in additional opportunities for the occurrence of both off-normal events and design basis accidents, such as a fuel handling or cask drop event.

Since the four assemblies are currently in a safe condition in the four individual casks, and in full compliance with the CoC cooling time requirement, the integrity of the casks and fuel will not be impacted by the short period of non-compliance in 2001. Therefore, the additional personnel radiation exposure, generation of LLRW, and financial cost would not be in the public interest.

4.

Technical Analysis The TN-68 system provides criticality control, passive heat removal, confinement, and shielding, independent of any other facility structures or components. The structural design of the cask also maintains the integrity of the fuel during storage.

The cask design requires certain limits on spent fuel parameters, including fuel type, assembly weight, initial enrichment, maximum burnup, minimum cooling time, and physical condition to safely store the spent fuel. These limitations are included in the thermal, structural, radiological, and criticality evaluations for the cask.

The TN-68 is designed to store 68 boiling water reactor (BWR) type spent fuel assemblies.

CoC 1027 Amendment 0 establishes a maximum allowable initial lattice-average enrichment of 3.7 wt% U-235, a maximum bundle average burnup of 40 GWd/MTU, a maximum decay heat load of 0.312 kW/assembly, and a minimum cooling time of ten years, for all BWR fuel types.

The allowable combinations of burnup, enrichment, and cooling time ensure that the thermal, shielding, and confinement design functions for a loaded fuel assembly are bounded by those evaluated in the Independent Fuel Storage Safety Analysis Report (IFSSAR) for the design fuel assembly. With respect to cooling time, the specified value of ten years ensures that the maximum decay heat load per assembly shall not exceed the TS 2.1.1.E.ii value of 0.312 kW (i.e., the bounding design value).

Page 4 of 8 Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Relocate and/or reload the assemblies Reinstall the lid Remove the TN-68 casks from the spent fuel pool Process the reloaded casks to ensure cask integrity Lower the loaded casks to the Reactor Building trackway Transport each cask back to the ISFSI pad.

Based on historical loading performance, EGC has determined that the implementation of this process would result in approximately 300 mrem of personnel radiation exposure per cask (Le., 1.2 person-rem total) and a financial cost of approximately $409,000 per cask (i.e., $1.63 million total), as well as the generation of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) (Le., in the form of radiologically contaminated consumables and anti-contamination clothing used during the unloading and reloading process). In addition, the process would result in additional opportunities for the occurrence of both off-normal events and design basis accidents, such as a fuel handling or cask drop event.

Since the four assemblies are currently in a safe condition in the four individual casks, and in full compliance with the CoG cooling time requirement, the integrity of the casks and fuel will not be impacted by the short period of non-compliance in 2001. Therefore, the additional personnel radiation exposure, generation of LLRW, and financial cost would not be in the public interest.

4. Technical Analysis The TN-68 system provides criticality control, passive heat removal, confinement, and shielding, independent of any other facility structures or components. The structural design of the cask also maintains the integrity of the fuel during storage.

The cask design requires certain limits on spent fuel parameters, including fuel type, assembly weight, initial enrichment, maximum burnup, minimum COOling time, and physical condition to safely store the spent fuel. These limitations are included in the thermal, structural, radiological, and criticality evaluations for the cask.

The TN-68 is designed to store 68 boiling water reactor (BWR) type spent fuel assemblies.

GoG 1027 Amendment 0 establishes a maximum allowable initial lattice-average enrichment of 3.7 wt% U-235, a maximum bundle average burnup of 40 GWdlMTU, a maximum decay heat load of 0.312 kW/assembly, and a minimum cooling time of ten years, for all BWR fuel types.

The allowable combinations of burnup, enrichment, and cooling time ensure that the thermal, shielding, and confinement design functions for a loaded fuel assembly are bounded by those evaluated in the Independent Fuel Storage Safety Analysis Report (IFSSAR) for the design fuel assembly. With respect to cooling time, the specified value of ten years ensures that the maximum decay heat load per assembly shall not exceed the TS 2.1.1.E.ii value of 0.312 kW (Le., the bounding design value).

Page 4 of 8

Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Reactivity parameters for the four loaded fuel assemblies and associated casks were not affected by the non-compliance period. The reactivity parameters of the fuel at the time of loading complied with Technical Specification requirements.

a.

Thermal Design Function Upon discovery of the non-compliance for the four spent nuclear fuel assemblies, EGC calculated the as-loaded decay heat load value for each fuel assembly, using the actual assembly burnup, enrichment, and cooling times. This calculation was performed using the analytical method in Regulatory Guide (RG) 3.54, "Spent Fuel Heat Generation in an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation," as well as the analytical method provided in CoC 1027 Amendment 1, TS 2.1.1, Figure 2.1.1-2. The actual decay heat value for each of the four assemblies was 0.201 kW using the RG 3.54 method and 0.194 kW using the CoC Amendment 1 method. Both values are bounded by the IFSSAR and TS design limit of 0.312 kW. Therefore, the short period of time in 2001 when the cooling time for each of the four assemblies was less than the minimum required did not impact the thermal design function of the casks.

b. Radiation Shielding Design Function Shielding for the TN-68 cask is provided mainly by the cask body. For the neutron shielding, a borated polyester resin compound surrounds the cask body and a polypropylene disk covers the lid. Additional shielding is provided by the steel shell surrounding the resin layer and by the steel and aluminum structure of the fuel basket.

Geometric attenuation, enhanced by air and ground attenuation, provides additional dose reduction for distant locations at the restricted area and site boundaries.

As part of the initial IFSSAR for CoC 1027, Amendment 0, a shielding evaluation was performed utilizing the source terms from a GE 7x7 fuel assembly with an initial bundle-average enrichment of 3.3 wt% and a total maximum bundle average burnup of 40 GWd/MTU. Given the design basis burnup and enrichment, this fuel assembly type is the most conservative based on the initial uranium loading. The shielding evaluation resulted in projected radiation levels that formed the basis for the dose rate limits in TS 5.2.3, "Cask Surface Dose Rate Evaluation Program."

The total gamma and neutron sources of the four non-compliant fuel assemblies were approximately 27% and 70% lower, respectively, than the design basis fuel sources.

Similarly, actual contact dose rates on the TN-68 cask, following loading of the four non-compliant fuel assemblies in 2001, were significantly lower than the TS 5.2.3 limits.

Therefore, the shielding design function will continue to limit external dose to levels bounded by the TN-68 IFSSAR.

c.

Confinement Design Function The confinement of radioactivity during the storage of spent fuel in the TN-68 cask system is ensured by the use of multiple confinement barriers and systems. These barriers are the fuel pellet matrix, the fuel cladding, and the cask.

Page 5 of 8 Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Reactivity parameters for the four loaded fuel assemblies and associated casks were not affected by the non-compliance period. The reactivity parameters of the fuel at the time of loading complied with Technical Specification requirements.

a. Thermal Design Function Upon discovery of the non-compliance for the four spent nuclear fuel assemblies, EGG calculated the as-loaded decay heat load value for each fuel assembly, using the actual assembly burnup, enrichment, and cooling times. This calculation was performed using the analytical method in Regulatory Guide (RG) 3.54, "Spent Fuel Heat Generation in an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation," as well as the analytical method provided in GoG 1027 Amendment 1, TS 2.1.1, Figure 2.1.1-2. The actual decay heat value for each of the four assemblies was 0.201 kW using the RG 3.54 method and 0.194 kW using the GoG Amendment 1 method. Both values are bounded by the I FSSAR and TS design limit of 0.312 kW. Therefore, the short period of time in 2001 when the cooling time for each of the four assemblies was less than the minimum required did not impact the thermal design function of the casks.
b. Radiation Shielding Design Function Shielding for the TN-68 cask is provided mainly by the cask body. For the neutron shielding, a borated polyester resin compound surrounds the cask body and a polypropylene disk covers the lid. Additional shielding is provided by the steel shell surrounding the resin layer and by the steel and aluminum structure of the fuel basket.

Geometric attenuation, enhanced by air and ground attenuation, provides additional dose reduction for distant locations at the restricted area and site boundaries.

As part of the initial IFSSAR for GoG 1027, Amendment 0, a shielding evaluation was performed utilizing the source terms from a GE 7x7 fuel assembly with an initial bundle-average enrichment of 3.3 wt% and a total maximum bundle average burnup of 40 GWd/MTU. Given the design basis burnup and enrichment, this fuel assembly type is the most conservative based on the initial uranium loading. The shielding evaluation resulted in projected radiation levels that formed the basis for the dose rate limits in TS 5.2.3, "Cask Surface Dose Rate Evaluation Program."

The total gamma and neutron sources of the four non-compliant fuel assemblies were approximately 27% and 70% lower, respectively, than the design basis fuel sources.

Similarly, actual contact dose rates on the TN-68 cask, following loading of the four non-compliant fuel assemblies in 2001, were significantly lower than the TS 5.2.3 limits.

Therefore, the shielding design function will continue to limit external dose to levels bounded by the TN-68 I FSSAR.

c. Confinement Design Function The confinement of radioactivity during the storage of spent fuel in the TN-68 cask system is ensured by the use of multiple confinement barriers and systems. These barriers are the fuel pellet matrix, the fuel cladding, and the cask.

Page 5 of 8

Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation The long-term integrity of the stored fuel is dependent on storage in a dry, inert environment and maintenance of adequate heat transfer mechanisms. This environment is established by removing water from the cask cavity and backfilling the cavity with helium (i.e., an inert gas). Helium assists in heat removal and provides a non-reactive environment to protect fuel assemblies against fuel cladding degradation which might otherwise lead to gross rupture.

The thermal design function analyses for storage operations assume that the cask is filled with helium. As described above, the decay heat load for each of the four non-compliant fuel assemblies are bounded by the thermal analysis in the IFSSAR for a design fuel assembly. Therefore, the short period of time in 2001 when the cooling time for each of the four assemblies was less than the minimum required, did not impact the confinement design function of the casks.

In addition, TS 3.1.1, "Cask Cavity Vacuum Drying," and TS 3.1.2, "Cask Helium Back Pressure," specify Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) and Surveillance Requirements (SRs) to ensure that the required helium environment within a TN-68 cask is correctly established during loading operations. TS 3.1.3, "Cask Helium Leak Rate" and TS 3.1.5, "Cask Interseal Pressure," establish LCOs and SRs to ensure that this environment is maintained during storage operations. When loaded in 2001, the four applicable TN-68 casks were in compliance with TS 3.1.1 and TS 3.1.2. Ongoing monitoring of the four casks, as required by TS 3.1.3 and TS 3.1.5, has confirmed continued compliance with TS requirements. This compliance ensures that the confinement design function was satisfied when initially loaded, and continues to be satisfied during storage operations.

5.

Environmental Consideration EGC has evaluated the environmental impacts of the proposed exemption request and has determined that the proposed action will not have an adverse impact to the environment.

Therefore, the proposed action does not require any Federal permits, licenses, approvals, or other entitlements.

a.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The PBAPS ISFSI is a radiologically controlled, Protected Area with limited access, and is located inside the EGC Owner Controlled Area. The area considered for potential environmental impact as a result of this exemption request is the area in and surrounding the ISFSI.

The interaction of a loaded TN-68 with the environment is through the thermal, shielding, and confinement design functions for the cask system.

Upon discovery of the CoC 1027 Amendment 0 non-compliance for the four spent nuclear fuel assemblies, EGC calculated the as-loaded decay heat load value for each fuel assembly, using the actual assembly burnup, enrichment, and cooling times. The Page 6of8 Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation The long-term integrity of the stored fuel is dependent on storage in a dry, inert environment and maintenance of adequate heat transfer mechanisms. This environment is established by removing water from the cask cavity and backfilling the cavity with helium (Le., an inert gas). Helium assists in heat removal and provides a non-reactive environment to protect fuel assemblies against fuel cladding degradation which might otherwise lead to gross rupture.

The thermal design function analyses for storage operations assume that the cask is filled with helium. As described above, the decay heat load for each of the four non-compliant fuel assemblies are bounded by the thermal analYSis in the IFSSAR for a design fuel assembly. Therefore, the short period of time in 2001 when the cooling time for each of the four assemblies was less than the minimum required, did not impact the confinement design function of the casks.

In addition, TS 3.1.1, "Cask Cavity Vacuum Drying," and TS 3.1.2, "Cask Helium Back Pressure," specify Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) and Surveillance Requirements (SRs) to ensure that the required helium environment within a TN-68 cask is correctly established during loading operations. TS 3.1.3, "Cask Helium Leak Rate" and TS 3.1.5, "Cask Interseal Pressure," establish LCOs and SRs to ensure that this environment is maintained during storage operations. When loaded in 2001, the four applicable TN-68 casks were in compliance with TS 3.1.1 and TS 3.1.2. OngOing monitoring of the four casks, as required by TS 3.1.3 and TS 3.1.5, has confirmed continued compliance with TS requirements. This compliance ensures that the confinement design function was satisfied when initially loaded, and continues to be satisfied during storage operations.

5. Environmental Consideration EGC has evaluated the environmental impacts of the proposed exemption request and has determined that the proposed action will not have an adverse impact to the environment.

Therefore, the proposed action does not require any Federal permits, licenses, approvals, or other entitlements.

a. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The PBAPS ISFSI is a radiologically controlled, Protected Area with limited access, and is located inside the EGC Owner Controlled Area. The area considered for potential environmental impact as a result of this exemption request is the area in and surrounding the ISFSI.

The interaction of a loaded TN-68 with the environment is through the thermal, shielding, and confinement design functions for the cask system.

Upon discovery of the CoC 1027 Amendment 0 non-compliance for the four spent nuclear fuel assemblies, EGC calculated the as-loaded decay heat load value for each fuel assembly, using the actual assembly burnup, enrichment, and cooling times. The Page 6 of 8

Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation actual decay heat value for each of the four assemblies was bounded by the IFSSAR and TS design limit of 0.312 kW, with significant margin.

Based on the actual radioactive source terms for the four non-compliant assemblies, relative to the design source term, as well as the initial radiation levels on the four applicable TN-68 casks, relative to design limits, the shielding design function will continue to limit external dose to levels bounded by the TN-68 IFSSAR.

Finally, since the decay heat load of the four assemblies are bounded by the IFSSAR design thermal analysis, the confinement design functions of the fuel cladding and the TN-68 structure were not adversely impacted by the as-loaded configurations.

In that compliance with TS 2.1.1, Table 2.1.1-1 for all four non-compliant assemblies was achieved on September 14, 2001, EGC has concluded that all TN-68 design functions impacting the environment are, and will continue to be bounded by the IFSSAR evaluations.

EGC has also determined that there are no gaseous, liquid or solid effluents (radiological or non-radiological), radiological exposures (worker or member of the public) or land disturbances associated with the proposed action. Therefore, approval of the requested exemption to allow the fuel assemblies to remain as loaded has no impact on the environment.

b. Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided Should the Exemption be Approved As noted previously, there are no environmental impacts associated with approval of this exemption. Therefore, there are no adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the exemption request be approved.
c. Alternative to the Proposed Action In addition to the proposed exemption request, EGC has considered the alternative action to correct the historical condition, as established in TS 2.2, "Functional and Operational Limits Violations." Specifically, if a Functional and Operational Limit is violated, TS 2.2.1 requires the licensee to remove the affected fuel assemblies and place in a safe condition. In this case, the applicable fuel assemblies would be removed from their respective casks and either reloaded into a TN-68 cask, or unloaded into a PBAPS spent fuel pool. This would involve the following steps:

n Retrieve each affected TN-68 from the ISFSI Pad and transport to the PBAPS Unit 3 Reactor Building trackway n

Lift each cask with the Reactor Building crane to the PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel pool n

Remove the casks' lids and applicable fuel assemblies n

Relocate and/or reload the assemblies n

Reinstall the lid n

Remove the TN-68 casks from the spent fuel pool n

Process the reloaded casks to ensure cask integrity Page 7 of 8 Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation actual decay heat value for each of the four assemblies was bounded by the IFSSAR and TS design limit of 0.312 kW, with significant margin.

Based on the actual radioactive source terms for the four non-compliant assemblies, relative to the design source term, as well as the initial radiation levels on the four applicable TN-B8 casks, relative to design limits, the shielding design function will continue to limit external dose to levels bounded by the TN-B8 IFSSAR.

Finally, since the decay heat load of the four assemblies are bounded by the I FSSAR design thermal analysis, the confinement design functions of the fuel cladding and the TN-B8 structure were not adversely impacted by the as-loaded configurations.

In that compliance with TS 2.1.1, Table 2.1.1-1 for all four non-compliant assemblies was achieved on September 14, 2001, EGC has concluded that all TN-B8 design functions impacting the environment are, and will continue to be bounded by the I FSSAR evaluations.

EGC has also determined that there are no gaseous, liquid or solid effluents (radiological or non-radiological), radiological exposures (worker or member of the public) or land disturbances associated with the proposed action. Therefore, approval of the requested exemption to allow the fuel assemblies to remain as loaded has no impact on the environment.

b. Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided Should the Exemption be Approved As noted previously, there are no environmental impacts associated with approval of this exemption. Therefore, there are no adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the exemption request be approved.
c. Alternative to the Proposed Action In addition to the proposed exemption request, EGC has considered the alternative action to correct the historical condition, as established in TS 2.2, "Functional and Operational Limits Violations." Specifically, if a Functional and Operational Limit is violated, TS 2.2.1 requires the licensee to remove the affected fuel assemblies and place in a safe condition. In this case, the applicable fuel assemblies would be removed from their respective casks and either reloaded into a TN-68 cask, or unloaded into a PBAPS spent fuel pool. This would involve the following steps:
  • Retrieve each affected TN-68 from the ISFSI Pad and transport to the PBAPS Unit 3 Reactor Building trackway
  • Lift each cask with the Reactor Building crane to the PBAPS Unit 3 spent fuel pool
  • Remove the casks' lids and applicable fuel assemblies
  • Relocate and/or reload the assemblies
  • Reinstall the lid
  • Remove the TN-B8 casks from the spent fuel pool
  • Process the reloaded casks to ensure cask integrity Page 7 of 8

Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation n

Lower the loaded casks to the Reactor Building trackway n

Transport each cask back to the ISFSI pad.

This alternative would restore the affected as-loaded TN-68 casks to compliance with CoC 1027.

d. Environmental Effects of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action The environmental impacts of the alternative to the proposed action would result in both real and potential radiological impacts. Based on historical loading performance, EGC has determined that the implementation of this process would result in approximately 300 mrem of personnel radiation exposure per cask (i.e., 1.2 person -rem total) and a financial cost of approximately $409,000 per cask (i.e., $1.63 million total), as well as the generation of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) (i.e., in the form of radiologically contaminated consumables and anti-contamination clothing used during the unloading and reloading process). In addition, the process would result in additional opportunities for the occurrence of both off-normal events and design basis accidents, such as a fuel handling or cask drop event.

e.

Conclusion and Status of Compliance As a result of the environmental assessment, EGC concludes that the proposed action, which will allow EGC to maintain the four fuel assemblies in their current storage configuration, is in the public interest in that it avoids the adverse environmental, radiological, and financial effects associated with the alternative to the proposed action.

Page 8 of 8 Attachment 10 CFR 72.7 Exemption Request Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation

  • Lower the loaded casks to the Reactor Building trackway
  • Transport each cask back to the ISFSI pad.

This alternative would restore the affected as-loaded TN-68 casks to compliance with CoC 1027.

d. Environmental Effects of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action The environmental impacts of the alternative to the proposed action would result in both real and potential radiological impacts. Based on historical loading performance, EGC has determined that the implementation of this process would result in approximately 300 mrem of personnel radiation exposure per cask (Le., 1.2 person-rem total) and a financial cost of approximately $409,000 per cask (Le., $1.63 million total), as well as the generation of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) (Le., in the form of radiologically contaminated consumables and anti-contamination clothing used during the unloading and reloading process). In addition, the process would result in additional opportunities for the occurrence of both off-normal events and design basis accidents, such as a fuel handling or cask drop event.
e. Conclusion and Status of Compliance As a result of the environmental assessment, EGC concludes that the proposed action, which will allow EGC to maintain the four fuel assemblies in their current storage configuration, is in the public interest in that it avoids the adverse environmental, radiological, and financial effects associated with the alternative to the proposed action.

Page 8 of 8