L-14-031, August 2014 Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051): Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Maria Korsnick ExeLon Generation1                                      Senior Vice President, Northeast Operations Chief Nuclear Officer. CENG 100 Constellation Way Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC                           Suite 500P Baltimore. MID 21202 410-470-5133 Office 443-213-6739 Fax www.exeloncorp.com maria.korsnick@exeloncorp.com NRC Order No. EA-12-051 FLL-14-031 August 26, 2014 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69 Docket Nos. 50-220 and 50-410
{{#Wiki_filter:Maria Korsnick Senior Vice President, Northeast Operations ExeLon Generation1 Chief Nuclear Officer. CENG 100 Constellation Way Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC Suite 500P Baltimore. MID 21202 410-470-5133 Office 443-213-6739 Fax www.exeloncorp.com maria.korsnick@exeloncorp.com NRC Order No. EA-12-051 FLL-14-031 August 26, 2014 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69 Docket Nos. 50-220 and 50-410


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 26: Line 26:
(1) NRC Order Number EA-12-051, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated March 12, 2012 (ML12054A679)
(1) NRC Order Number EA-12-051, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated March 12, 2012 (ML12054A679)
On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Order EA-12-051 (Reference 1) to Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC (CENG) for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC, (NMPNS) Units 1 (NMP1) and 2 (NMP2). Reference (1) requires submission of a status report at six-month intervals following submittal of the overall integrated plan.
On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Order EA-12-051 (Reference 1) to Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC (CENG) for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC, (NMPNS) Units 1 (NMP1) and 2 (NMP2). Reference (1) requires submission of a status report at six-month intervals following submittal of the overall integrated plan.
Attachments (1) and (2) provide the third Six-Month Status Report for NMP1 and NMP2 pursuant to Section IV, Condition C.2, of Reference (1). This report updates the milestone accomplishments since the submittal of the last status report, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief and the basis, if any.
Attachments (1) and (2) provide the third Six-Month Status Report for NMP1 and NMP2 pursuant to Section IV, Condition C.2, of Reference (1).
This report updates the milestone accomplishments since the submittal of the last status report, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief and the basis, if any.
There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter.
There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter.
If there are any questions regarding this letter, please contact Bruce Montgomery, Acting Manager - Licensing, at 443-532-6533.
If there are any questions regarding this letter, please contact Bruce Montgomery, Acting Manager - Licensing, at 443-532-6533.


U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission August 26, 2014 Page 2 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 2 6 th day of August, 2014.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission August 26, 2014 Page 2 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Respectfully, Mary G. Kor     ick MGK/STD Attachments (1)                   NMP1 Six-Month Status Report (August 2014) for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (2)                   NMP2 Six-Month Status Report (August 2014) for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation cc:       Regional Administrator, Region I, USNRC NRC Project Manager, NRR - Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation S. Gray, DNR
Executed on the 2 6 th day of August, 2014.
Respectfully, Mary G. Kor ick MGK/STD Attachments (1)
NMP1 Six-Month Status Report (August 2014) for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (2)
NMP2 Six-Month Status Report (August 2014) for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation cc:
Regional Administrator, Region I, USNRC NRC Project Manager, NRR - Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation S. Gray, DNR


ATTACHMENT (1)
ATTACHMENT (1)
Line 38: Line 43:


ATTACHMENT (1)
ATTACHMENT (1)
AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION 1   Introduction The Nine Mile Point Unit 1 (NMP1) Overall Integrated Plan (OIP) was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in February 2013 (Reference 1), documenting the requirements to install reliable spent fuel pool level instrumentation (SFP LI), in response to Reference 2.
AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION 1
Subsequently, a supplement to the OIP for SFP LI was submitted to the NRC in March 2013 (Reference 3). By letter dated June 5, 2013 (Reference 4), the NRC requested that CENG respond to a request for additional information (RAI) regarding the NMP1 QIP for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation. By letter dated July 5, 2013 (Reference 5), CENG responded to the June 5, 2013 RAI. By letter dated August 27, 2013 (Reference 6), NMP1 provided the first Six-Month Status Report. By letter dated November 15, 2013 (Reference 7), the NRC provided NMP with its Interim Staff Evaluation (ISE) and RAI regarding the OIP for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation. By letter dated February 24, 2014 (Reference 10), NMP1 provided the second Six-Month Status Report.
Introduction The Nine Mile Point Unit 1 (NMP1) Overall Integrated Plan (OIP) was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in February 2013 (Reference 1), documenting the requirements to install reliable spent fuel pool level instrumentation (SFP LI), in response to Reference 2.
This attachment provides an update of milestone accomplishments since submittal of the OIP, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief/relaxation and associated basis (if applicable).     NMP1 has completed detailed design for the AREVA VEGAPULS 62ER Through Air Radar System and is completing planning activities for installation. No significant changes have occurred since the previous Six-Month Status Report was submitted in February, 2014 (Reference 10).
Subsequently, a supplement to the OIP for SFP LI was submitted to the NRC in March 2013 (Reference 3). By {{letter dated|date=June 5, 2013|text=letter dated June 5, 2013}} (Reference 4), the NRC requested that CENG respond to a request for additional information (RAI) regarding the NMP1 QIP for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation. By {{letter dated|date=July 5, 2013|text=letter dated July 5, 2013}} (Reference 5), CENG responded to the June 5, 2013 RAI. By {{letter dated|date=August 27, 2013|text=letter dated August 27, 2013}} (Reference 6), NMP1 provided the first Six-Month Status Report.
2   Milestone Accomplishments The following milestones have been completed since the development of the OIP (Reference 1),
By {{letter dated|date=November 15, 2013|text=letter dated November 15, 2013}} (Reference 7), the NRC provided NMP with its Interim Staff Evaluation (ISE) and RAI regarding the OIP for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation.
By {{letter dated|date=February 24, 2014|text=letter dated February 24, 2014}} (Reference 10), NMP1 provided the second Six-Month Status Report.
This attachment provides an update of milestone accomplishments since submittal of the OIP, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief/relaxation and associated basis (if applicable).
NMP1 has completed detailed design for the AREVA VEGAPULS 62ER Through Air Radar System and is completing planning activities for installation. No significant changes have occurred since the previous Six-Month Status Report was submitted in February, 2014 (Reference 10).
2 Milestone Accomplishments The following milestones have been completed since the development of the OIP (Reference 1),
and are current as of August 15, 2014.
and are current as of August 15, 2014.
    "   Submitted Overall Integrated Plan                   1Q2013
" Submitted Overall Integrated Plan 1Q2013
    "   Issued Purchase Order for Instrumentation         2Q2013
" Issued Purchase Order for Instrumentation 2Q2013 Commenced Engineering and Design 2Q2013 Selected Instrumentation and Technology 2Q2013
* Commenced Engineering and Design                   2Q2013
" Submitted first six-month update 3Q2013
* Selected Instrumentation and Technology           2Q2013
" Submitted second six-month update 1Q2014
    "   Submitted first six-month update                   3Q2013
" Received Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation 2Q2014 Completed detailed design 2Q2014 3
    "   Submitted second six-month update                   1Q2014
Milestone Schedule Status Table 1 provides an update to milestone schedule to support the OIP (References 1 and 3). It provides the activity status of each item and the expected completion date, noting any change.
    "   Received Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation           2Q2014
* Completed detailed design                         2Q2014 3   Milestone Schedule Status Table 1 provides an update to milestone schedule to support the OIP (References 1 and 3). It provides the activity status of each item and the expected completion date, noting any change.
The dates are planning dates subject to change as design and implementation details are developed. Any changes to the following target completion dates will be reflected in 6-month status reports.
The dates are planning dates subject to change as design and implementation details are developed. Any changes to the following target completion dates will be reflected in 6-month status reports.
The revised milestone target completion dates do not impact the order implementation date.
The revised milestone target completion dates do not impact the order implementation date.
Line 56: Line 63:


ATTACHMENT (1)
ATTACHMENT (1)
AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 1 Status of Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Milestones Target                               Revised Milestone                   Completion             Status           Target Date                             Completion Date Commence Engineering and Design               2Q2013             Complete Complete Engineering and Design               1Q2014             Complete Respond to NRC ISE RAIs                       3Q2014               Started Receipt of SFP Instruments                   3Q2014             Complete Commence Installation of SFP                 3Q2014           Not Started         4Q2014 Instruments Close out Project/Plant Turnover             2Q2015           Not Started 4   Changes to Compliance Method No changes have been made to the compliance method since the February 2014 Six-Month Status Report (Reference 10).
AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 1 Status of Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Milestones Target Revised Milestone Completion Status Target Date Completion Date Commence Engineering and Design 2Q2013 Complete Complete Engineering and Design 1Q2014 Complete Respond to NRC ISE RAIs 3Q2014 Started Receipt of SFP Instruments 3Q2014 Complete Commence Installation of SFP 3Q2014 Not Started 4Q2014 Instruments Close out Project/Plant Turnover 2Q2015 Not Started 4
5   Need for Relief/Relaxation and Basis for the Relief/Relaxation NMP1 expects to comply with the order implementation date and no relief/relaxation is required at this time.
Changes to Compliance Method No changes have been made to the compliance method since the February Status Report (Reference 10).
6   Open Items from Overall Integrated Plan and Interim Safety Evaluation Table 2 provides a status of the OIP open items documented in the February 2014 Six-Month Status Report (Reference 6). These open items include previous regulatory commitments made in the July 2013 RAI Response (Reference 5). As noted in the memorandum from C.A. Hunt (NRC) to M.A. Mitchell (NRC), Summary of the November 26, 2013 Public Meeting to Discuss Industry Responses to Staff Interim Evaluations for Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Reference 9), the ISE questions supersede any previous requests for information issued by the staff concerning the spent fuel pool instrumentation. Table 3 provides a status of the ISE RAIs.
2014 Six-Month 5
Table 2 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items NMP1 Open Items                                       Status
Need for Relief/Relaxation and Basis for the Relief/Relaxation NMP1 expects to comply with the order implementation date and no relief/relaxation is required at this time.
: 1. Provide specific requirements of the procedure controlling irradiated     Deleted (2/14) equipment or materials stored in the SFP, including details of the analysis to be performed, to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the     Superseded by ISE second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.                           RAIs Page 2 of 7
6 Open Items from Overall Integrated Plan and Interim Safety Evaluation Table 2 provides a status of the OIP open items documented in the February 2014 Six-Month Status Report (Reference 6). These open items include previous regulatory commitments made in the July 2013 RAI Response (Reference 5). As noted in the memorandum from C.A. Hunt (NRC) to M.A. Mitchell (NRC), Summary of the November 26, 2013 Public Meeting to Discuss Industry Responses to Staff Interim Evaluations for Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Reference 9), the ISE questions supersede any previous requests for information issued by the staff concerning the spent fuel pool instrumentation. Table 3 provides a status of the ISE RAIs.
Table 2 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items NMP1 Open Items Status
: 1. Provide specific requirements of the procedure controlling irradiated Deleted (2/14) equipment or materials stored in the SFP, including details of the analysis to be performed, to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the Superseded by ISE second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.
RAIs Page 2 of 7


ATTACHMENT (1)
ATTACHMENT (1)
AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 2 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items (Continued)
AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 2 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items (Continued)
: 2. The final system component locations and wire routings will be         Deleted (2/14) forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.                         Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 2. The final system component locations and wire routings will be Deleted (2/14) forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.
: 3. The full hydrodynamic/seismic qualification details will be forwarded   Deleted (2/14) to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.                                       Superseded by ISE RAIs
Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 4. The final mounting details for the horn antenna and waveguide           Deleted (2/14) assembly will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.             Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 3. The full hydrodynamic/seismic qualification details will be forwarded Deleted (2/14) to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.
: 5. Further details of the qualification and test program used to confirm   Deleted (2/14) the reliability of the permanently installed equipment during and following Beyond Design Bases Events will be forwarded to the       Superseded by ISE NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall                     RAIs Integrated Plan status update.
Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 6. Further details on independence and channel separation of the           Deleted (2/14) permanently installed equipment will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan     Superseded by ISE status update.                                                             RAIs
: 4. The final mounting details for the horn antenna and waveguide Deleted (2/14) assembly will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.
: 7. Further details on the AC and DC power supplies of the                 Deleted (2/14) permanently installed equipment will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan     Superseded by ISE status update.                                                             RAIs
Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 8. The final calibration methodology will be forwarded to the NRC on       Deleted (2/14)
: 5. Further details of the qualification and test program used to confirm Deleted (2/14) the reliability of the permanently installed equipment during and following Beyond Design Bases Events will be forwarded to the Superseded by ISE NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall RAIs Integrated Plan status update.
February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.                                                       Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 6. Further details on independence and channel separation of the Deleted (2/14) permanently installed equipment will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan Superseded by ISE status update.
: 9. Specific details of the functional and calibration test program,       Deleted (2/14) including frequencies, will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, Superseded by ISE 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.                                                                     RAIs
RAIs
: 10. The preventive maintenance, test and calibration program will be       Deleted (2/14) forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.                         Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 7. Further details on the AC and DC power supplies of the Deleted (2/14) permanently installed equipment will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan Superseded by ISE status update.
: 11. The compensatory actions to take when both channels are out of         Deleted (2/14) service, and the applicable administrative requirements and implementation procedures will be forwarded to the NRC on           Superseded by ISE February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan             RAIs status update.
RAIs
: 8. The final calibration methodology will be forwarded to the NRC on Deleted (2/14)
February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.
Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 9. Specific details of the functional and calibration test program, Deleted (2/14) including frequencies, will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, Superseded by ISE 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.
RAIs
: 10. The preventive maintenance, test and calibration program will be Deleted (2/14) forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.
Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 11. The compensatory actions to take when both channels are out of Deleted (2/14) service, and the applicable administrative requirements and implementation procedures will be forwarded to the NRC on Superseded by ISE February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan RAIs status update.
Page 3 of 7
Page 3 of 7


ATTACHMENT (1)
ATTACHMENT (1)
AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 2 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items (Continued)
AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 2 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items (Continued)
: 12. The compensatory actions to take when a channel is not restored               Deleted (2/14) within 90 days, and the applicable administrative requirements and implementation procedures will be forwarded to the NRC on                   Superseded by ISE February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan                   RAIs status update.
: 12. The compensatory actions to take when a channel is not restored Deleted (2/14) within 90 days, and the applicable administrative requirements and implementation procedures will be forwarded to the NRC on Superseded by ISE February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan RAIs status update.
Table 3 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs NMP1 ISE RAIs                                   Status
Table 3 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs NMP1 ISE RAIs Status
: 1. Confirm that the correct elevation for Level 2 at NMP1 is 321 ft. 11.5         Started (8/14) in. and provide the information regarding specific requirements of the procedure controlling irradiated equipment or materials stored in the SFP, including details of the analysis to be performed to determine the projected dose rate impact and the appropriate Level 2 value as a result of the potential for irradiated material to be stored in the SPF in the future.
: 1. Confirm that the correct elevation for Level 2 at NMP1 is 321 ft. 11.5 Started (8/14) in. and provide the information regarding specific requirements of the procedure controlling irradiated equipment or materials stored in the SFP, including details of the analysis to be performed to determine the projected dose rate impact and the appropriate Level 2 value as a result of the potential for irradiated material to be stored in the SPF in the future.
: 2. Provide a final labeled sketch or marked-up plant drawing of the plan         Started (2/14) view of the SFP, depicting the SFP inside dimensions, the planned locations/placement of the primary and back-up SFP level sensor, and the proposed routing of the cables that will extend from these sensors toward the location of the read-out/display device.
: 2. Provide a final labeled sketch or marked-up plant drawing of the plan Started (2/14) view of the SFP, depicting the SFP inside dimensions, the planned locations/placement of the primary and back-up SFP level sensor, and the proposed routing of the cables that will extend from these sensors toward the location of the read-out/display device.
: 3. Provide the results of the analyses used to verify the design criteria         Started (2/14) and methodology for seismic testing of the SFP instrumentation and the electronics units, including, design basis maximum seismic loads and the hydrodynamic loads that could result from pool sloshing or other effects that could accompany such seismic forces.
: 3. Provide the results of the analyses used to verify the design criteria Started (2/14) and methodology for seismic testing of the SFP instrumentation and the electronics units, including, design basis maximum seismic loads and the hydrodynamic loads that could result from pool sloshing or other effects that could accompany such seismic forces.
: 4. For each of the mounting attachments required to attach SFP Level             Started (2/14) equipment to plant structures, please describe the design inputs, and the methodology that was used to qualify the structural integrity of the affected structures/equipment.
: 4. For each of the mounting attachments required to attach SFP Level Started (2/14) equipment to plant structures, please describe the design inputs, and the methodology that was used to qualify the structural integrity of the affected structures/equipment.
: 5. Provide information indicating (a) whether the 80c rating for the sensor       Started (2/14) electronics is a continuous duty rating; and, (b) what will be the maximum expected ambient temperature in the room in which the sensor electronics will be located under BDB conditions in which there is no ac power available to run Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems.
: 5. Provide information indicating (a) whether the 80c rating for the sensor Started (2/14) electronics is a continuous duty rating; and, (b) what will be the maximum expected ambient temperature in the room in which the sensor electronics will be located under BDB conditions in which there is no ac power available to run Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems.
Page 4 of 7
Page 4 of 7


ATTACHMENT (1)
ATTACHMENT (1)
AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 3 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs (continued)
AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 3 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs (continued)
: 6. Provide information indicating the maximum expected relative humidity     Started (2/14) in the room in which the sensor electronics will be located under BOB conditions, in which there is no ac power available to run HVAC systems, and whether the sensor electronics is capable of continuously performing its required functions under this expected humidity condition.
: 6. Provide information indicating the maximum expected relative humidity Started (2/14) in the room in which the sensor electronics will be located under BOB conditions, in which there is no ac power available to run HVAC systems, and whether the sensor electronics is capable of continuously performing its required functions under this expected humidity condition.
: 7. Provide analysis of the maximum expected radiological conditions         Started (2/14)
: 7. Provide analysis of the maximum expected radiological conditions Started (2/14)
(dose rate and total integrated dose) to which the sensor and associated co-located electronic equipment will be exposed. Also, please provide documentation indicating how it was determined that the electronics for this equipment is capable of withstanding a total integrated dose of 1X10 3 Rads. Please discuss the time period over which the analyzed total integrated dose was applied.
(dose rate and total integrated dose) to which the sensor and associated co-located electronic equipment will be exposed. Also, please provide documentation indicating how it was determined that the electronics for this equipment is capable of withstanding a total integrated dose of 1X10 3 Rads. Please discuss the time period over which the analyzed total integrated dose was applied.
: 8. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative         Started (2/14) sensor design, the shock test method, test results, and forces applied to the sensor applicable to its successful tests demonstrating that the referenced previous testing provides an appropriate means to demonstrate reliability of the sensor under the effects of severe shock.
: 8. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative Started (2/14) sensor design, the shock test method, test results, and forces applied to the sensor applicable to its successful tests demonstrating that the referenced previous testing provides an appropriate means to demonstrate reliability of the sensor under the effects of severe shock.
: 9. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative         Started (2/14) sensor design, the vibration test method, test results, and the forces and their frequency ranges and directions applied to the sensor applicable to its successful tests, demonstrating that the referenced previous testing provides an appropriate means to demonstrate reliability of the sensor under the effects of high vibration,
: 9. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative Started (2/14) sensor design, the vibration test method, test results, and the forces and their frequency ranges and directions applied to the sensor applicable to its successful tests, demonstrating that the referenced previous testing provides an appropriate means to demonstrate reliability of the sensor under the effects of high vibration,
: 10. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative         Started (2/14) display panel ratings against postulated plant conditions. Also provide results of the manufacturer's shock and vibration test methods, test results, and the forces and their frequency ranges and directions applied to the display panel associated with its successful tests.
: 10. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative Started (2/14) display panel ratings against postulated plant conditions. Also provide results of the manufacturer's shock and vibration test methods, test results, and the forces and their frequency ranges and directions applied to the display panel associated with its successful tests.
: 11. Provide the results of seismic testing per IEEE 344-2004, to             Started (2/14) demonstrate the reliability of the components within the power and control panel with regard to shock and vibration effects.
: 11. Provide the results of seismic testing per IEEE 344-2004, to Started (2/14) demonstrate the reliability of the components within the power and control panel with regard to shock and vibration effects.
: 12. Provide analysis of the seismic testing results and show that the       Started (2/14) instrument performance reliability, following exposure to simulated seismic conditions representative of the environment anticipated for the SFP structures at Nine Mile Point, has been adequately demonstrated.
: 12. Provide analysis of the seismic testing results and show that the Started (2/14) instrument performance reliability, following exposure to simulated seismic conditions representative of the environment anticipated for the SFP structures at Nine Mile Point, has been adequately demonstrated.
: 13. Provide the final configuration of the power supply source for each     Started (2/14) channel so that the staff may conclude that the two channels are independent from a power supply assignment perspective.
: 13. Provide the final configuration of the power supply source for each Started (2/14) channel so that the staff may conclude that the two channels are independent from a power supply assignment perspective.
Page 5 of 7
Page 5 of 7


ATTACHMENT (1)
ATTACHMENT (1)
AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 3 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs (continued)
AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 3 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs (continued)
: 14. Provide the results of the calculation depicting the battery backup duty     Started (2/14) cycle requirements demonstrating that its capacity is sufficient to maintain the level indication function until offsite resource availability is reasonably assured.
: 14. Provide the results of the calculation depicting the battery backup duty Started (2/14) cycle requirements demonstrating that its capacity is sufficient to maintain the level indication function until offsite resource availability is reasonably assured.
: 15. Provide analysis verifying that the proposed instrument performance is       Started (2/14) consistent with these estimated accuracy normal and BDB values.
: 15. Provide analysis verifying that the proposed instrument performance is Started (2/14) consistent with these estimated accuracy normal and BDB values.
Please demonstrate that the channels will retain these accuracy performance values following a loss of power and subsequent restoration of power.
Please demonstrate that the channels will retain these accuracy performance values following a loss of power and subsequent restoration of power.
: 16. Provide a list of the procedures addressing operation (both normal and       Started (2/14) abnormal response), calibration, test, maintenance, and inspection procedures that will be developed for use of the spent SFP instrumentation. The licensee is requested to include a brief description of the specific technical objectives to be achieved within each procedure.
: 16. Provide a list of the procedures addressing operation (both normal and Started (2/14) abnormal response), calibration, test, maintenance, and inspection procedures that will be developed for use of the spent SFP instrumentation. The licensee is requested to include a brief description of the specific technical objectives to be achieved within each procedure.
: 17. Provide the following:                                                       Started (2/14)
: 17. Provide the following:
Started (2/14)
: a. Further information describing the maintenance and testing program the licensee will establish and implement to ensure that regular testing and calibration is performed and verified by inspection and audit to demonstrate conformance with design and system readiness requirements. Please include a description of the plans for ensuring that necessary channel checks, functional tests, periodic calibration, and maintenance will be conducted for the level measurement system and its supporting equipment.
: a. Further information describing the maintenance and testing program the licensee will establish and implement to ensure that regular testing and calibration is performed and verified by inspection and audit to demonstrate conformance with design and system readiness requirements. Please include a description of the plans for ensuring that necessary channel checks, functional tests, periodic calibration, and maintenance will be conducted for the level measurement system and its supporting equipment.
: b. Information describing compensatory actions when both channels are out-of-order, and the implementation procedures
: b. Information describing compensatory actions when both channels are out-of-order, and the implementation procedures
: c. Additional information describing expedited and compensatory actions in the maintenance procedure to address when one of the instrument channels cannot be restored to functional status within 90 days
: c. Additional information describing expedited and compensatory actions in the maintenance procedure to address when one of the instrument channels cannot be restored to functional status within 90 days
: 18. Provide a description of the in-situ calibration process at the SFP           Started (2/14) location that will result in the channel calibration being maintained at its design accuracy.
: 18. Provide a description of the in-situ calibration process at the SFP Started (2/14) location that will result in the channel calibration being maintained at its design accuracy.
7   Potential Interim Safety Evaluation Impacts There are no potential impacts to the Interim Safety Evaluation at this time.
7 Potential Interim Safety Evaluation Impacts There are no potential impacts to the Interim Safety Evaluation at this time.
Page 6 of 7
Page 6 of 7


ATTACHMENT (1)
ATTACHMENT (1)
AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION 8   References The following references support the updates to the Overall Integrated Plan described in this enclosure.
AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION 8
References The following references support the updates to the Overall Integrated Plan described in this enclosure.
: 1. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Overall Integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), dated February 28, 2013 (ML13066A172)
: 1. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Overall Integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), dated February 28, 2013 (ML13066A172)
: 2. NRC Order Number EA-12-051, Issuance of Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated March 12, 2012 (ML12054A679)
: 2. NRC Order Number EA-12-051, Issuance of Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated March 12, 2012 (ML12054A679)
Line 123: Line 143:
: 5. Letter from P. M. Swift (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Response to Request for Additional Information Re: Overall integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) (TAC Nos. MF1 131 and MF1 132), dated July 5, 2013 (ML13197A220)
: 5. Letter from P. M. Swift (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Response to Request for Additional Information Re: Overall integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) (TAC Nos. MF1 131 and MF1 132), dated July 5, 2013 (ML13197A220)
: 6. Letter from E. D. Dean (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation(Order Number EA-12-051), dated August 27, 2013 (ML13254A279)
: 6. Letter from E. D. Dean (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation(Order Number EA-12-051), dated August 27, 2013 (ML13254A279)
: 7. Letter from M.C. Thadani (NRC) to J.A. Spina (CENG), Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Interim Staff Evaluation and Request for Additional Information Regarding The Overall Integrated Plan for Implementation of Order EA-12-051, Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (TAC NOS. MF1131, MF1132, MF1140, and MF1141), dated November 15, 2013 (ML13281A205)
: 7. Letter from M.C. Thadani (NRC) to J.A. Spina (CENG), Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Interim Staff Evaluation and Request for Additional Information Regarding The Overall Integrated Plan for Implementation of Order EA-12-051, Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (TAC NOS.
: MF1131, MF1132,
: MF1140, and MF1141),
dated November 15, 2013 (ML13281A205)
: 8. NEI 12-02, Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051, "To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," Revision 1, August 2012 (ML12240A307)
: 8. NEI 12-02, Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051, "To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," Revision 1, August 2012 (ML12240A307)
: 9. Memorandum from C.A. Hunt (NRC) to M.A. Mitchell (NRC), Summary of the November 26, 2013 Public Meeting to Discuss Industry Responses to Staff Interim Evaluations for Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated December 26, 2013 (ML13347B030)
: 9. Memorandum from C.A. Hunt (NRC) to M.A. Mitchell (NRC), Summary of the November 26, 2013 Public Meeting to Discuss Industry Responses to Staff Interim Evaluations for Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated December 26, 2013 (ML13347B030)
: 10. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), February 2014 Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA       051), dated February 24, 2014 (ML14069A180)
: 10. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), February 2014 Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA 051), dated February 24, 2014 (ML14069A180)
Page 7 of 7
Page 7 of 7


Line 134: Line 157:


ATTACHMENT (2)
ATTACHMENT (2)
AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION 1     Introduction The Nine Mile Point Unit 2 (NMP2) Overall Integrated Plan (OIP) was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in February 2013 (Reference 1), documenting the requirements to install reliable spent fuel pool level instrumentation (SFP LI), in response to Reference 2.
AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION 1
Subsequently, a supplement to the OIP for SFP LI was submitted to the NRC in March 2013 (Reference 3). By letter dated June 5, 2013 (Reference 4), the NRC requested that CENG respond to a request for additional information (RAI) regarding the NMP2 0IP for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation. By letter dated July 5, 2013 (Reference 5), CENG responded to the June 5, 2013 RAI. By letter dated Aug 27, 2013 (Reference 6), NMP2 provided the first Six-Month Status Report. By letter dated November 15, 2013 (Reference 7), the NRC provided NMP with its Interim Staff Evaluation (ISE) and RAI regarding the OIP for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation. By letter dated February 24, 2014 (Reference 10), NMP2 provided the second Six-Month Status Report.
Introduction The Nine Mile Point Unit 2 (NMP2) Overall Integrated Plan (OIP) was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in February 2013 (Reference 1), documenting the requirements to install reliable spent fuel pool level instrumentation (SFP LI), in response to Reference 2.
This attachment provides an update of milestone accomplishments since submittal of the OIP, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief/relaxation and associated basis (if applicable).     NMP2 has completed detailed design for the AREVA VEGAPULS 62ER Through Air Radar System and is completing planning activities for installation. No significant changes have occurred since the previous Six-Month Status Report was submitted in February, 2014 (Reference 10).
Subsequently, a supplement to the OIP for SFP LI was submitted to the NRC in March 2013 (Reference 3). By {{letter dated|date=June 5, 2013|text=letter dated June 5, 2013}} (Reference 4), the NRC requested that CENG respond to a request for additional information (RAI) regarding the NMP2 0IP for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation. By {{letter dated|date=July 5, 2013|text=letter dated July 5, 2013}} (Reference 5), CENG responded to the June 5, 2013 RAI.
2     Milestone Accomplishments The following milestones have been completed since the development of the OIP (Reference 1),
By letter dated Aug 27, 2013 (Reference 6), NMP2 provided the first Six-Month Status Report. By {{letter dated|date=November 15, 2013|text=letter dated November 15, 2013}} (Reference 7), the NRC provided NMP with its Interim Staff Evaluation (ISE) and RAI regarding the OIP for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation.
By {{letter dated|date=February 24, 2014|text=letter dated February 24, 2014}} (Reference 10), NMP2 provided the second Six-Month Status Report.
This attachment provides an update of milestone accomplishments since submittal of the OIP, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief/relaxation and associated basis (if applicable).
NMP2 has completed detailed design for the AREVA VEGAPULS 62ER Through Air Radar System and is completing planning activities for installation. No significant changes have occurred since the previous Six-Month Status Report was submitted in February, 2014 (Reference 10).
2 Milestone Accomplishments The following milestones have been completed since the development of the OIP (Reference 1),
and are current as of August 15, 2014.
and are current as of August 15, 2014.
    "   Submitted Overall Integrated Plan                   1Q2013
" Submitted Overall Integrated Plan 1Q2013 Issued Purchase Order for Instrumentation 2Q2013 Commenced Engineering and Design 2Q2013 Selected Instrumentation and Technology 2Q2013 Submitted first six-month update 3Q2013 Submitted second six-month update 1Q2014 Received Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation 2Q2014 Completed detailed design 2Q2014 3
* Issued Purchase Order for Instrumentation           2Q2013
Milestone Schedule Status Table 1 provides an update to milestone schedule to support the OIP (References 1 and 3). It provides the activity status of each item and the expected completion date, noting any change.
* Commenced Engineering and Design                   2Q2013
* Selected Instrumentation and Technology             2Q2013
* Submitted first six-month update                   3Q2013
* Submitted second six-month update                   1Q2014
* Received Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation           2Q2014
* Completed detailed design                         2Q2014 3     Milestone Schedule Status Table 1 provides an update to milestone schedule to support the OIP (References 1 and 3). It provides the activity status of each item and the expected completion date, noting any change.
The dates are planning dates subject to change as design and implementation details are developed. Any changes to the following target completion dates will be reflected in 6-month status reports.
The dates are planning dates subject to change as design and implementation details are developed. Any changes to the following target completion dates will be reflected in 6-month status reports.
The revised milestone target completion dates do not impact the order implementation date.
The revised milestone target completion dates do not impact the order implementation date.
Line 152: Line 173:


ATTACHMENT (2)
ATTACHMENT (2)
AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table I Status of Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Milestones Target                               Revised Milestone                   Completion             Status           Target Date                             Completion Date Commence Engineering and Design               2Q2013             Complete Complete Engineering and Design               1Q2014             Complete Respond to NRC ISE RAIs                       3Q2014               Started Receipt of SFP Instruments                   4Q2014             Complete Commence Installation of SFP                 4Q2014           Not Started Instruments Close out Project/Plant Turnover             2Q2016           Not Started 4   Changes to Compliance Method No changes have been made to the compliance method since the February 2014 Six-Month Status Report (Reference 10).
AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table I Status of Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Milestones Target Revised Milestone Completion Status Target Date Completion Date Commence Engineering and Design 2Q2013 Complete Complete Engineering and Design 1Q2014 Complete Respond to NRC ISE RAIs 3Q2014 Started Receipt of SFP Instruments 4Q2014 Complete Commence Installation of SFP 4Q2014 Not Started Instruments Close out Project/Plant Turnover 2Q2016 Not Started 4
5   Need for Relief/Relaxation and Basis for the Relief/Relaxation NMP2 expects to comply with the order implementation date and no relief/relaxation is required at this time.
Changes to Compliance Method No changes have been made to the compliance method since the February 2014 Six-Month Status Report (Reference 10).
6   Open Items from Overall Integrated Plan and Interim Safety Evaluation Table 2 provides a status of the OIP open items documented in the August 2013 Six-Month Status Report (Reference 6). These open items include previous regulatory commitments made in the July 2013 RAI Response (Reference 5). As noted in the memorandum from C.A. Hunt (NRC) to M.A. Mitchell (NRC), Summary of the November 26, 2013 Public Meeting to Discuss Industry Responses to Staff Interim Evaluations for Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Reference 9), the ISE questions supersede any previous requests for information issued by the staff concerning the spent fuel pool instrumentation. Table 3 provides a status of the ISE RAIs.
5 Need for Relief/Relaxation and Basis for the Relief/Relaxation NMP2 expects to comply with the order implementation date and no relief/relaxation is required at this time.
Table 2 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items NMP2 Open Items                                       Status
6 Open Items from Overall Integrated Plan and Interim Safety Evaluation Table 2 provides a status of the OIP open items documented in the August 2013 Six-Month Status Report (Reference 6). These open items include previous regulatory commitments made in the July 2013 RAI Response (Reference 5). As noted in the memorandum from C.A. Hunt (NRC) to M.A. Mitchell (NRC), Summary of the November 26, 2013 Public Meeting to Discuss Industry Responses to Staff Interim Evaluations for Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Reference 9), the ISE questions supersede any previous requests for information issued by the staff concerning the spent fuel pool instrumentation. Table 3 provides a status of the ISE RAIs.
: 1. Provide specific requirements of the procedure controlling irradiated     Deleted (2/14) equipment or materials stored in the SFP, including details of the analysis to be performed, to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the     Superseded by ISE second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.                           RAIs Page 2 of 7
Table 2 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items NMP2 Open Items Status
: 1. Provide specific requirements of the procedure controlling irradiated Deleted (2/14) equipment or materials stored in the SFP, including details of the analysis to be performed, to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the Superseded by ISE second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.
RAIs Page 2 of 7


ATTACHMENT (2)
ATTACHMENT (2)
AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 2 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items (continued) 2.- The final system component locations and wire routings will be         Deleted (2/14) forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second           Superseded by ISE NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.                               RAls
AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 2 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items (continued) 2.- The final system component locations and wire routings will be Deleted (2/14) forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second Superseded by ISE NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.
: 3. The full hydrodynamic/seismic qualification details will be forwarded   Deleted (2/14) to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.                                       Superseded by ISE RAIs
RAls
: 4. The final mounting details for the horn antenna and waveguide           Deleted (2/14) assembly will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.             Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 3. The full hydrodynamic/seismic qualification details will be forwarded Deleted (2/14) to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.
: 5. Further details of the qualification and test program used to confirm   Deleted (2/14) the reliability of the permanently installed equipment during and following Beyond Design Bases Events will be forwarded to the       Superseded by ISE NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall                     RAIs Integrated Plan status update.
Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 6. Further details on independence and channel separation of the           Deleted (2/14) permanently installed equipment will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan     Superseded by ISE status update.                                                             RAIs
: 4. The final mounting details for the horn antenna and waveguide Deleted (2/14) assembly will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.
: 7. Further details on the AC and DC power supplies of the                 Deleted (2/14) permanently installed equipment will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan     Superseded by ISE status update.                                                             RAIs
Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 8. The final calibration methodology will be forwarded to the NRC on       Deleted (2/14)
: 5. Further details of the qualification and test program used to confirm Deleted (2/14) the reliability of the permanently installed equipment during and following Beyond Design Bases Events will be forwarded to the Superseded by ISE NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall RAIs Integrated Plan status update.
February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.                                                       Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 6. Further details on independence and channel separation of the Deleted (2/14) permanently installed equipment will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan Superseded by ISE status update.
: 9. Specific details of the functional and calibration test program,       Deleted (2/14) including frequencies, will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, Superseded by ISE 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.                                                                     RAIs
RAIs
: 10. The preventive maintenance, test and calibration program will be       Deleted (2/14) forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.                         Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 7. Further details on the AC and DC power supplies of the Deleted (2/14) permanently installed equipment will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan Superseded by ISE status update.
: 11. The compensatory actions to take when both channels are out of         Deleted (2/14) service, and the applicable administrative requirements and implementation procedures will be forwarded to the NRC on           Superseded by ISE February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan             RAIs status update.
RAIs
: 8. The final calibration methodology will be forwarded to the NRC on Deleted (2/14)
February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.
Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 9. Specific details of the functional and calibration test program, Deleted (2/14) including frequencies, will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, Superseded by ISE 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.
RAIs
: 10. The preventive maintenance, test and calibration program will be Deleted (2/14) forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.
Superseded by ISE RAIs
: 11. The compensatory actions to take when both channels are out of Deleted (2/14) service, and the applicable administrative requirements and implementation procedures will be forwarded to the NRC on Superseded by ISE February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan RAIs status update.
Page 3 of 7
Page 3 of 7


ATTACHMENT (2)
ATTACHMENT (2)
AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 2 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items (continued)
AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 2 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items (continued)
: 12. The compensatory actions to take when a channel is not restored               Deleted (2/14) within 90 days, and the applicable administrative requirements and implementation procedures will be forwarded to the NRC on                   Superseded by ISE February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan                   RAIs status update.
: 12. The compensatory actions to take when a channel is not restored Deleted (2/14) within 90 days, and the applicable administrative requirements and implementation procedures will be forwarded to the NRC on Superseded by ISE February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan RAIs status update.
Table 3 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs NMP2 ISE RAIs                                   Status
Table 3 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs NMP2 ISE RAIs Status
: 1. Confirm that the correct elevation for Level 2 at NMP2 is 335 ft. 11.9         Started (8/14) in. and provide the information regarding specific requirements of the procedure controlling irradiated equipment or materials stored in the SFP, including details of the analysis to be performed to determine the projected dose rate impact and the appropriate Level 2 value as a result of the potential for irradiated material to be stored in the SPF in the future.
: 1. Confirm that the correct elevation for Level 2 at NMP2 is 335 ft. 11.9 Started (8/14) in. and provide the information regarding specific requirements of the procedure controlling irradiated equipment or materials stored in the SFP, including details of the analysis to be performed to determine the projected dose rate impact and the appropriate Level 2 value as a result of the potential for irradiated material to be stored in the SPF in the future.
: 2. Provide a final labeled sketch or marked-up plant drawing of the plan         Started (2/14) view of the SFP, depicting the SFP inside dimensions, the planned locations/placement of the primary and back-up SFP level sensor, and the proposed routing of the cables that will extend from these sensors toward the location of the read-out/display device.
: 2. Provide a final labeled sketch or marked-up plant drawing of the plan Started (2/14) view of the SFP, depicting the SFP inside dimensions, the planned locations/placement of the primary and back-up SFP level sensor, and the proposed routing of the cables that will extend from these sensors toward the location of the read-out/display device.
: 3. Provide the results of the analyses used to verify the design criteria         Started (2/14) and methodology for seismic testing of the SFP instrumentation and the electronics units, including, design basis maximum seismic loads and the hydrodynamic loads that could result from pool sloshing or other effects that could accompany such seismic forces.
: 3. Provide the results of the analyses used to verify the design criteria Started (2/14) and methodology for seismic testing of the SFP instrumentation and the electronics units, including, design basis maximum seismic loads and the hydrodynamic loads that could result from pool sloshing or other effects that could accompany such seismic forces.
: 4. For each of the mounting attachments required to attach SFP Level             Started (2/14) equipment to plant structures, please describe the design inputs, and the methodology that was used to qualify the structural integrity of the affected structures/equipment.
: 4. For each of the mounting attachments required to attach SFP Level Started (2/14) equipment to plant structures, please describe the design inputs, and the methodology that was used to qualify the structural integrity of the affected structures/equipment.
: 5. Provide information indicating (a) whether the 80c rating for the sensor       Started (2/14) electronics is a continuous duty rating; and, (b) what will be the maximum expected ambient temperature in the room in which the sensor electronics will be located under BDB conditions in which there is no ac power available to run Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems.
: 5. Provide information indicating (a) whether the 80c rating for the sensor Started (2/14) electronics is a continuous duty rating; and, (b) what will be the maximum expected ambient temperature in the room in which the sensor electronics will be located under BDB conditions in which there is no ac power available to run Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems.
Page 4 of 7
Page 4 of 7


ATTACHMENT (2)
ATTACHMENT (2)
AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 3 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs (continued)
AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 3 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs (continued)
: 6. Provide information indicating the maximum expected relative humidity     Started (2/14) in the room in which the sensor electronics will be located under BOB conditions, in which there is no ac power available to run HVAC systems, and whether the sensor electronics is capable of continuously performing its required functions under this expected humidity condition.
: 6. Provide information indicating the maximum expected relative humidity Started (2/14) in the room in which the sensor electronics will be located under BOB conditions, in which there is no ac power available to run HVAC systems, and whether the sensor electronics is capable of continuously performing its required functions under this expected humidity condition.
: 7. Provide analysis of the maximum expected radiological conditions         Started (2/14)
: 7. Provide analysis of the maximum expected radiological conditions Started (2/14)
(dose rate and total integrated dose) to which the sensor and associated co-located electronic equipment will be exposed. Also, please provide documentation indicating how it was determined that the electronics for this equipment is capable of withstanding a total integrated dose of 1X10 3 Rads. Please discuss the time period over which the analyzed total integrated dose was applied.
(dose rate and total integrated dose) to which the sensor and associated co-located electronic equipment will be exposed. Also, please provide documentation indicating how it was determined that the electronics for this equipment is capable of withstanding a total integrated dose of 1X10 3 Rads. Please discuss the time period over which the analyzed total integrated dose was applied.
: 8. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative         Started (2/14) sensor design, the shock test method, test results, and forces applied to the sensor applicable to its successful tests demonstrating that the referenced previous testing provides an appropriate means to demonstrate reliability of the sensor under the effects of severe shock.
: 8. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative Started (2/14) sensor design, the shock test method, test results, and forces applied to the sensor applicable to its successful tests demonstrating that the referenced previous testing provides an appropriate means to demonstrate reliability of the sensor under the effects of severe shock.
: 9. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative         Started (2/14) sensor design, the vibration test method, test results, and the forces and their frequency ranges and directions applied to the sensor applicable to its successful tests, demonstrating that the referenced previous testing provides an appropriate means to demonstrate reliability of the sensor under the effects of high vibration.
: 9. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative Started (2/14) sensor design, the vibration test method, test results, and the forces and their frequency ranges and directions applied to the sensor applicable to its successful tests, demonstrating that the referenced previous testing provides an appropriate means to demonstrate reliability of the sensor under the effects of high vibration.
: 10. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative         Started (2/14) display panel ratings against postulated plant conditions. Also provide results of the manufacturer's shock and vibration test methods, test results, and the forces and their frequency ranges and directions applied to the display panel associated with its successful tests.
: 10. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative Started (2/14) display panel ratings against postulated plant conditions. Also provide results of the manufacturer's shock and vibration test methods, test results, and the forces and their frequency ranges and directions applied to the display panel associated with its successful tests.
: 11. Provide the results of seismic testing per IEEE 344-2004, to             Started (2/14) demonstrate the reliability of the components within the power and control panel with regard to shock and vibration effects.
: 11. Provide the results of seismic testing per IEEE 344-2004, to Started (2/14) demonstrate the reliability of the components within the power and control panel with regard to shock and vibration effects.
: 12. Provide analysis of the seismic testing results and show that the       Started (2/14) instrument performance reliability, following exposure to simulated seismic conditions representative of the environment anticipated for the SFP structures at Nine Mile Point, has been adequately demonstrated.
: 12. Provide analysis of the seismic testing results and show that the Started (2/14) instrument performance reliability, following exposure to simulated seismic conditions representative of the environment anticipated for the SFP structures at Nine Mile Point, has been adequately demonstrated.
: 13. Provide the final configuration of the power supply source for each     Started (2/14) channel so that the staff may conclude that the two channels are independent from a power supply assignment perspective.
: 13. Provide the final configuration of the power supply source for each Started (2/14) channel so that the staff may conclude that the two channels are independent from a power supply assignment perspective.
Page 5 of 7
Page 5 of 7


ATTACHMENT (2)
ATTACHMENT (2)
AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 3 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs (continued)
AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 3 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs (continued)
: 14. Provide the results of the calculation depicting the battery backup duty     Started (2/14) cycle requirements demonstrating that its capacity is sufficient to maintain the level indication function until offsite resource availability is reasonably assured.
: 14. Provide the results of the calculation depicting the battery backup duty Started (2/14) cycle requirements demonstrating that its capacity is sufficient to maintain the level indication function until offsite resource availability is reasonably assured.
: 15. Provide analysis verifying that the proposed instrument performance is       Started (2/14) consistent with these estimated accuracy normal and 6DB values.
: 15. Provide analysis verifying that the proposed instrument performance is Started (2/14) consistent with these estimated accuracy normal and 6DB values.
Please demonstrate that the channels will retain these accuracy performance values following a loss of power and subsequent restoration of power.
Please demonstrate that the channels will retain these accuracy performance values following a loss of power and subsequent restoration of power.
: 16. Provide a list of the procedures addressing operation (both normal and Started (8/14) abnormal response), calibration, test, maintenance, and inspection procedures that will be developed for use of the spent SFP instrumentation. The licensee is requested to include a brief description of the specific technical objectives to be achieved within each procedure.
: 16. Provide a list of the procedures addressing operation (both normal and Started (8/14) abnormal response), calibration, test, maintenance, and inspection procedures that will be developed for use of the spent SFP instrumentation. The licensee is requested to include a brief description of the specific technical objectives to be achieved within each procedure.
: 17. Provide the following:                                                       Started (8/14)
: 17. Provide the following:
Started (8/14)
: a. Further information describing the maintenance and testing program the licensee will establish and implement to ensure that regular testing and calibration is performed and verified by inspection and audit to demonstrate conformance with design and system readiness requirements. Please include a description of the plans for ensuring that necessary channel checks, functional tests, periodic calibration, and maintenance will be conducted for the level measurement system and its supporting equipment.
: a. Further information describing the maintenance and testing program the licensee will establish and implement to ensure that regular testing and calibration is performed and verified by inspection and audit to demonstrate conformance with design and system readiness requirements. Please include a description of the plans for ensuring that necessary channel checks, functional tests, periodic calibration, and maintenance will be conducted for the level measurement system and its supporting equipment.
: b. Information describing compensatory actions when both channels are out-of-order, and the implementation procedures
: b. Information describing compensatory actions when both channels are out-of-order, and the implementation procedures
: c. Additional information describing expedited and compensatory actions in the maintenance procedure to address when one of the instrument channels cannot be restored to functional status within 90 days
: c. Additional information describing expedited and compensatory actions in the maintenance procedure to address when one of the instrument channels cannot be restored to functional status within 90 days
: 18. Provide a description of the in-situ calibration process at the SFP           Started (8/14) location that will result in the channel calibration being maintained at its design accuracy.
: 18. Provide a description of the in-situ calibration process at the SFP Started (8/14) location that will result in the channel calibration being maintained at its design accuracy.
7   Potential Interim Safety Evaluation Impacts There are no potential impacts to the Interim Safety Evaluation at this time.
7 Potential Interim Safety Evaluation Impacts There are no potential impacts to the Interim Safety Evaluation at this time.
Page 6 of 7
Page 6 of 7


ATTACHMENT (2)
ATTACHMENT (2)
AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION 8   References.
AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION 8
References.
The following references support the updates to the Overall Integrated Plan described in this enclosure.
The following references support the updates to the Overall Integrated Plan described in this enclosure.
: 1. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Overall Integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), dated February 28, 2013 (ML13066A172)
: 1. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Overall Integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), dated February 28, 2013 (ML13066A172)
Line 219: Line 252:
: 5. Letter from P. M. Swift (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Response to Request for Additional Information Re: Overall integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) (TAC Nos. MF1131 and MF1132), dated July 5, 2013 (ML13197A220)
: 5. Letter from P. M. Swift (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Response to Request for Additional Information Re: Overall integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) (TAC Nos. MF1131 and MF1132), dated July 5, 2013 (ML13197A220)
: 6. Letter from E. D. Dean (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), dated August 27, 2013 (ML13254A279)
: 6. Letter from E. D. Dean (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), dated August 27, 2013 (ML13254A279)
: 7. Letter from M.C. Thadani (NRC) to J.A. Spina (CENG), Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Interim Staff Evaluation and Request for Additional Information Regarding The Overall Integrated Plan for Implementation of Order EA-12-051, Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (TAC NOS. MF1131, MF1132, MF1140, and MF1141), dated November 15, 2013 (ML13281A205)
: 7. Letter from M.C. Thadani (NRC) to J.A. Spina (CENG), Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Interim Staff Evaluation and Request for Additional Information Regarding The Overall Integrated Plan for Implementation of Order EA-12-051, Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (TAC NOS.
: MF1131, MF1132,
: MF1140, and MF1141),
dated November 15, 2013 (ML13281A205)
: 8. NEI 12-02, Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051, "To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," Revision 1, August 2012 (ML12240A307)
: 8. NEI 12-02, Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051, "To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," Revision 1, August 2012 (ML12240A307)
: 9. Memorandum from C.A. Hunt (NRC) to M.A. Mitchell (NRC), Summary of the November 26, 2013 Public Meeting to Discuss Industry Responses to Staff Interim Evaluations for Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated December 26, 2013 (ML13347B030)
: 9. Memorandum from C.A. Hunt (NRC) to M.A. Mitchell (NRC), Summary of the November 26, 2013 Public Meeting to Discuss Industry Responses to Staff Interim Evaluations for Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated December 26, 2013 (ML13347B030)
: 10. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), February 2014 Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA       051), dated February 24, 2014 (ML14069A180)
: 10. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), February 2014 Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA 051), dated February 24, 2014 (ML14069A180)
Page 7 of 7}}
Page 7 of 7}}

Latest revision as of 17:14, 10 January 2025

August 2014 Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)
ML14241A016
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/26/2014
From: Korsnick M
Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, Exelon Generation Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
EA-12-051, FLL-14-031
Download: ML14241A016 (18)
v • d • e


Text

Maria Korsnick Senior Vice President, Northeast Operations ExeLon Generation1 Chief Nuclear Officer. CENG 100 Constellation Way Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC Suite 500P Baltimore. MID 21202 410-470-5133 Office 443-213-6739 Fax www.exeloncorp.com maria.korsnick@exeloncorp.com NRC Order No. EA-12-051 FLL-14-031 August 26, 2014 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69 Docket Nos. 50-220 and 50-410

Subject:

August 2014 Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)

Reference:

(1) NRC Order Number EA-12-051, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated March 12, 2012 (ML12054A679)

On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Order EA-12-051 (Reference 1) to Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC (CENG) for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC, (NMPNS) Units 1 (NMP1) and 2 (NMP2). Reference (1) requires submission of a status report at six-month intervals following submittal of the overall integrated plan.

Attachments (1) and (2) provide the third Six-Month Status Report for NMP1 and NMP2 pursuant to Section IV, Condition C.2, of Reference (1).

This report updates the milestone accomplishments since the submittal of the last status report, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief and the basis, if any.

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter.

If there are any questions regarding this letter, please contact Bruce Montgomery, Acting Manager - Licensing, at 443-532-6533.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission August 26, 2014 Page 2 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on the 2 6 th day of August, 2014.

Respectfully, Mary G. Kor ick MGK/STD Attachments (1)

NMP1 Six-Month Status Report (August 2014) for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (2)

NMP2 Six-Month Status Report (August 2014) for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation cc:

Regional Administrator, Region I, USNRC NRC Project Manager, NRR - Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation S. Gray, DNR

ATTACHMENT (1)

NMP1 SIX-MONTH STATUS REPORT (AUGUST 2014)

FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, LLC August 26, 2014

ATTACHMENT (1)

AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION 1

Introduction The Nine Mile Point Unit 1 (NMP1) Overall Integrated Plan (OIP) was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in February 2013 (Reference 1), documenting the requirements to install reliable spent fuel pool level instrumentation (SFP LI), in response to Reference 2.

Subsequently, a supplement to the OIP for SFP LI was submitted to the NRC in March 2013 (Reference 3). By letter dated June 5, 2013 (Reference 4), the NRC requested that CENG respond to a request for additional information (RAI) regarding the NMP1 QIP for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation. By letter dated July 5, 2013 (Reference 5), CENG responded to the June 5, 2013 RAI. By letter dated August 27, 2013 (Reference 6), NMP1 provided the first Six-Month Status Report.

By letter dated November 15, 2013 (Reference 7), the NRC provided NMP with its Interim Staff Evaluation (ISE) and RAI regarding the OIP for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation.

By letter dated February 24, 2014 (Reference 10), NMP1 provided the second Six-Month Status Report.

This attachment provides an update of milestone accomplishments since submittal of the OIP, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief/relaxation and associated basis (if applicable).

NMP1 has completed detailed design for the AREVA VEGAPULS 62ER Through Air Radar System and is completing planning activities for installation. No significant changes have occurred since the previous Six-Month Status Report was submitted in February, 2014 (Reference 10).

2 Milestone Accomplishments The following milestones have been completed since the development of the OIP (Reference 1),

and are current as of August 15, 2014.

" Submitted Overall Integrated Plan 1Q2013

" Issued Purchase Order for Instrumentation 2Q2013 Commenced Engineering and Design 2Q2013 Selected Instrumentation and Technology 2Q2013

" Submitted first six-month update 3Q2013

" Submitted second six-month update 1Q2014

" Received Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation 2Q2014 Completed detailed design 2Q2014 3

Milestone Schedule Status Table 1 provides an update to milestone schedule to support the OIP (References 1 and 3). It provides the activity status of each item and the expected completion date, noting any change.

The dates are planning dates subject to change as design and implementation details are developed. Any changes to the following target completion dates will be reflected in 6-month status reports.

The revised milestone target completion dates do not impact the order implementation date.

Page 1 of 7

ATTACHMENT (1)

AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 1 Status of Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Milestones Target Revised Milestone Completion Status Target Date Completion Date Commence Engineering and Design 2Q2013 Complete Complete Engineering and Design 1Q2014 Complete Respond to NRC ISE RAIs 3Q2014 Started Receipt of SFP Instruments 3Q2014 Complete Commence Installation of SFP 3Q2014 Not Started 4Q2014 Instruments Close out Project/Plant Turnover 2Q2015 Not Started 4

Changes to Compliance Method No changes have been made to the compliance method since the February Status Report (Reference 10).

2014 Six-Month 5

Need for Relief/Relaxation and Basis for the Relief/Relaxation NMP1 expects to comply with the order implementation date and no relief/relaxation is required at this time.

6 Open Items from Overall Integrated Plan and Interim Safety Evaluation Table 2 provides a status of the OIP open items documented in the February 2014 Six-Month Status Report (Reference 6). These open items include previous regulatory commitments made in the July 2013 RAI Response (Reference 5). As noted in the memorandum from C.A. Hunt (NRC) to M.A. Mitchell (NRC), Summary of the November 26, 2013 Public Meeting to Discuss Industry Responses to Staff Interim Evaluations for Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Reference 9), the ISE questions supersede any previous requests for information issued by the staff concerning the spent fuel pool instrumentation. Table 3 provides a status of the ISE RAIs.

Table 2 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items NMP1 Open Items Status

1. Provide specific requirements of the procedure controlling irradiated Deleted (2/14) equipment or materials stored in the SFP, including details of the analysis to be performed, to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the Superseded by ISE second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.

RAIs Page 2 of 7

ATTACHMENT (1)

AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 2 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items (Continued)

2. The final system component locations and wire routings will be Deleted (2/14) forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.

Superseded by ISE RAIs

3. The full hydrodynamic/seismic qualification details will be forwarded Deleted (2/14) to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.

Superseded by ISE RAIs

4. The final mounting details for the horn antenna and waveguide Deleted (2/14) assembly will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.

Superseded by ISE RAIs

5. Further details of the qualification and test program used to confirm Deleted (2/14) the reliability of the permanently installed equipment during and following Beyond Design Bases Events will be forwarded to the Superseded by ISE NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall RAIs Integrated Plan status update.
6. Further details on independence and channel separation of the Deleted (2/14) permanently installed equipment will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan Superseded by ISE status update.

RAIs

7. Further details on the AC and DC power supplies of the Deleted (2/14) permanently installed equipment will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan Superseded by ISE status update.

RAIs

8. The final calibration methodology will be forwarded to the NRC on Deleted (2/14)

February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.

Superseded by ISE RAIs

9. Specific details of the functional and calibration test program, Deleted (2/14) including frequencies, will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, Superseded by ISE 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.

RAIs

10. The preventive maintenance, test and calibration program will be Deleted (2/14) forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.

Superseded by ISE RAIs

11. The compensatory actions to take when both channels are out of Deleted (2/14) service, and the applicable administrative requirements and implementation procedures will be forwarded to the NRC on Superseded by ISE February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan RAIs status update.

Page 3 of 7

ATTACHMENT (1)

AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 2 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items (Continued)

12. The compensatory actions to take when a channel is not restored Deleted (2/14) within 90 days, and the applicable administrative requirements and implementation procedures will be forwarded to the NRC on Superseded by ISE February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan RAIs status update.

Table 3 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs NMP1 ISE RAIs Status

1. Confirm that the correct elevation for Level 2 at NMP1 is 321 ft. 11.5 Started (8/14) in. and provide the information regarding specific requirements of the procedure controlling irradiated equipment or materials stored in the SFP, including details of the analysis to be performed to determine the projected dose rate impact and the appropriate Level 2 value as a result of the potential for irradiated material to be stored in the SPF in the future.
2. Provide a final labeled sketch or marked-up plant drawing of the plan Started (2/14) view of the SFP, depicting the SFP inside dimensions, the planned locations/placement of the primary and back-up SFP level sensor, and the proposed routing of the cables that will extend from these sensors toward the location of the read-out/display device.
3. Provide the results of the analyses used to verify the design criteria Started (2/14) and methodology for seismic testing of the SFP instrumentation and the electronics units, including, design basis maximum seismic loads and the hydrodynamic loads that could result from pool sloshing or other effects that could accompany such seismic forces.
4. For each of the mounting attachments required to attach SFP Level Started (2/14) equipment to plant structures, please describe the design inputs, and the methodology that was used to qualify the structural integrity of the affected structures/equipment.
5. Provide information indicating (a) whether the 80c rating for the sensor Started (2/14) electronics is a continuous duty rating; and, (b) what will be the maximum expected ambient temperature in the room in which the sensor electronics will be located under BDB conditions in which there is no ac power available to run Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems.

Page 4 of 7

ATTACHMENT (1)

AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 3 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs (continued)

6. Provide information indicating the maximum expected relative humidity Started (2/14) in the room in which the sensor electronics will be located under BOB conditions, in which there is no ac power available to run HVAC systems, and whether the sensor electronics is capable of continuously performing its required functions under this expected humidity condition.
7. Provide analysis of the maximum expected radiological conditions Started (2/14)

(dose rate and total integrated dose) to which the sensor and associated co-located electronic equipment will be exposed. Also, please provide documentation indicating how it was determined that the electronics for this equipment is capable of withstanding a total integrated dose of 1X10 3 Rads. Please discuss the time period over which the analyzed total integrated dose was applied.

8. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative Started (2/14) sensor design, the shock test method, test results, and forces applied to the sensor applicable to its successful tests demonstrating that the referenced previous testing provides an appropriate means to demonstrate reliability of the sensor under the effects of severe shock.
9. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative Started (2/14) sensor design, the vibration test method, test results, and the forces and their frequency ranges and directions applied to the sensor applicable to its successful tests, demonstrating that the referenced previous testing provides an appropriate means to demonstrate reliability of the sensor under the effects of high vibration,
10. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative Started (2/14) display panel ratings against postulated plant conditions. Also provide results of the manufacturer's shock and vibration test methods, test results, and the forces and their frequency ranges and directions applied to the display panel associated with its successful tests.
11. Provide the results of seismic testing per IEEE 344-2004, to Started (2/14) demonstrate the reliability of the components within the power and control panel with regard to shock and vibration effects.
12. Provide analysis of the seismic testing results and show that the Started (2/14) instrument performance reliability, following exposure to simulated seismic conditions representative of the environment anticipated for the SFP structures at Nine Mile Point, has been adequately demonstrated.
13. Provide the final configuration of the power supply source for each Started (2/14) channel so that the staff may conclude that the two channels are independent from a power supply assignment perspective.

Page 5 of 7

ATTACHMENT (1)

AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 3 Status of NMP1 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs (continued)

14. Provide the results of the calculation depicting the battery backup duty Started (2/14) cycle requirements demonstrating that its capacity is sufficient to maintain the level indication function until offsite resource availability is reasonably assured.
15. Provide analysis verifying that the proposed instrument performance is Started (2/14) consistent with these estimated accuracy normal and BDB values.

Please demonstrate that the channels will retain these accuracy performance values following a loss of power and subsequent restoration of power.

16. Provide a list of the procedures addressing operation (both normal and Started (2/14) abnormal response), calibration, test, maintenance, and inspection procedures that will be developed for use of the spent SFP instrumentation. The licensee is requested to include a brief description of the specific technical objectives to be achieved within each procedure.
17. Provide the following:

Started (2/14)

a. Further information describing the maintenance and testing program the licensee will establish and implement to ensure that regular testing and calibration is performed and verified by inspection and audit to demonstrate conformance with design and system readiness requirements. Please include a description of the plans for ensuring that necessary channel checks, functional tests, periodic calibration, and maintenance will be conducted for the level measurement system and its supporting equipment.
b. Information describing compensatory actions when both channels are out-of-order, and the implementation procedures
c. Additional information describing expedited and compensatory actions in the maintenance procedure to address when one of the instrument channels cannot be restored to functional status within 90 days
18. Provide a description of the in-situ calibration process at the SFP Started (2/14) location that will result in the channel calibration being maintained at its design accuracy.

7 Potential Interim Safety Evaluation Impacts There are no potential impacts to the Interim Safety Evaluation at this time.

Page 6 of 7

ATTACHMENT (1)

AUGUST 2014 NMP1 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION 8

References The following references support the updates to the Overall Integrated Plan described in this enclosure.

1. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Overall Integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), dated February 28, 2013 (ML13066A172)
2. NRC Order Number EA-12-051, Issuance of Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated March 12, 2012 (ML12054A679)
3. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Supplement to Overall Integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated March 8, 2013 (ML13073A155)
4. Letter from M. C. Thadani (NRC) to M. G. Korsnick (CENG), Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Additional Information Re: Overall Integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order EA-12-051)(TAC Nos. MF1131 and MF1 132), dated June 5, 2013 (ML13154A399)
5. Letter from P. M. Swift (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Response to Request for Additional Information Re: Overall integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) (TAC Nos. MF1 131 and MF1 132), dated July 5, 2013 (ML13197A220)
6. Letter from E. D. Dean (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation(Order Number EA-12-051), dated August 27, 2013 (ML13254A279)
7. Letter from M.C. Thadani (NRC) to J.A. Spina (CENG), Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Interim Staff Evaluation and Request for Additional Information Regarding The Overall Integrated Plan for Implementation of Order EA-12-051, Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (TAC NOS.
MF1131, MF1132,
MF1140, and MF1141),

dated November 15, 2013 (ML13281A205)

8. NEI 12-02, Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051, "To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," Revision 1, August 2012 (ML12240A307)
9. Memorandum from C.A. Hunt (NRC) to M.A. Mitchell (NRC), Summary of the November 26, 2013 Public Meeting to Discuss Industry Responses to Staff Interim Evaluations for Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated December 26, 2013 (ML13347B030)
10. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), February 2014 Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA 051), dated February 24, 2014 (ML14069A180)

Page 7 of 7

ATTACHMENT (2)

NMP2 SIX-MONTH STATUS REPORT (AUGUST 2014)

FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, LLC August 26, 2014

ATTACHMENT (2)

AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION 1

Introduction The Nine Mile Point Unit 2 (NMP2) Overall Integrated Plan (OIP) was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in February 2013 (Reference 1), documenting the requirements to install reliable spent fuel pool level instrumentation (SFP LI), in response to Reference 2.

Subsequently, a supplement to the OIP for SFP LI was submitted to the NRC in March 2013 (Reference 3). By letter dated June 5, 2013 (Reference 4), the NRC requested that CENG respond to a request for additional information (RAI) regarding the NMP2 0IP for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation. By letter dated July 5, 2013 (Reference 5), CENG responded to the June 5, 2013 RAI.

By letter dated Aug 27, 2013 (Reference 6), NMP2 provided the first Six-Month Status Report. By letter dated November 15, 2013 (Reference 7), the NRC provided NMP with its Interim Staff Evaluation (ISE) and RAI regarding the OIP for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation.

By letter dated February 24, 2014 (Reference 10), NMP2 provided the second Six-Month Status Report.

This attachment provides an update of milestone accomplishments since submittal of the OIP, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief/relaxation and associated basis (if applicable).

NMP2 has completed detailed design for the AREVA VEGAPULS 62ER Through Air Radar System and is completing planning activities for installation. No significant changes have occurred since the previous Six-Month Status Report was submitted in February, 2014 (Reference 10).

2 Milestone Accomplishments The following milestones have been completed since the development of the OIP (Reference 1),

and are current as of August 15, 2014.

" Submitted Overall Integrated Plan 1Q2013 Issued Purchase Order for Instrumentation 2Q2013 Commenced Engineering and Design 2Q2013 Selected Instrumentation and Technology 2Q2013 Submitted first six-month update 3Q2013 Submitted second six-month update 1Q2014 Received Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation 2Q2014 Completed detailed design 2Q2014 3

Milestone Schedule Status Table 1 provides an update to milestone schedule to support the OIP (References 1 and 3). It provides the activity status of each item and the expected completion date, noting any change.

The dates are planning dates subject to change as design and implementation details are developed. Any changes to the following target completion dates will be reflected in 6-month status reports.

The revised milestone target completion dates do not impact the order implementation date.

Page 1 of 7

ATTACHMENT (2)

AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table I Status of Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Milestones Target Revised Milestone Completion Status Target Date Completion Date Commence Engineering and Design 2Q2013 Complete Complete Engineering and Design 1Q2014 Complete Respond to NRC ISE RAIs 3Q2014 Started Receipt of SFP Instruments 4Q2014 Complete Commence Installation of SFP 4Q2014 Not Started Instruments Close out Project/Plant Turnover 2Q2016 Not Started 4

Changes to Compliance Method No changes have been made to the compliance method since the February 2014 Six-Month Status Report (Reference 10).

5 Need for Relief/Relaxation and Basis for the Relief/Relaxation NMP2 expects to comply with the order implementation date and no relief/relaxation is required at this time.

6 Open Items from Overall Integrated Plan and Interim Safety Evaluation Table 2 provides a status of the OIP open items documented in the August 2013 Six-Month Status Report (Reference 6). These open items include previous regulatory commitments made in the July 2013 RAI Response (Reference 5). As noted in the memorandum from C.A. Hunt (NRC) to M.A. Mitchell (NRC), Summary of the November 26, 2013 Public Meeting to Discuss Industry Responses to Staff Interim Evaluations for Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Reference 9), the ISE questions supersede any previous requests for information issued by the staff concerning the spent fuel pool instrumentation. Table 3 provides a status of the ISE RAIs.

Table 2 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items NMP2 Open Items Status

1. Provide specific requirements of the procedure controlling irradiated Deleted (2/14) equipment or materials stored in the SFP, including details of the analysis to be performed, to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the Superseded by ISE second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.

RAIs Page 2 of 7

ATTACHMENT (2)

AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 2 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items (continued) 2.- The final system component locations and wire routings will be Deleted (2/14) forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second Superseded by ISE NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.

RAls

3. The full hydrodynamic/seismic qualification details will be forwarded Deleted (2/14) to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.

Superseded by ISE RAIs

4. The final mounting details for the horn antenna and waveguide Deleted (2/14) assembly will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.

Superseded by ISE RAIs

5. Further details of the qualification and test program used to confirm Deleted (2/14) the reliability of the permanently installed equipment during and following Beyond Design Bases Events will be forwarded to the Superseded by ISE NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall RAIs Integrated Plan status update.
6. Further details on independence and channel separation of the Deleted (2/14) permanently installed equipment will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan Superseded by ISE status update.

RAIs

7. Further details on the AC and DC power supplies of the Deleted (2/14) permanently installed equipment will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan Superseded by ISE status update.

RAIs

8. The final calibration methodology will be forwarded to the NRC on Deleted (2/14)

February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.

Superseded by ISE RAIs

9. Specific details of the functional and calibration test program, Deleted (2/14) including frequencies, will be forwarded to the NRC on February 28, Superseded by ISE 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.

RAIs

10. The preventive maintenance, test and calibration program will be Deleted (2/14) forwarded to the NRC on February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan status update.

Superseded by ISE RAIs

11. The compensatory actions to take when both channels are out of Deleted (2/14) service, and the applicable administrative requirements and implementation procedures will be forwarded to the NRC on Superseded by ISE February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan RAIs status update.

Page 3 of 7

ATTACHMENT (2)

AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 2 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation OIP Open Items (continued)

12. The compensatory actions to take when a channel is not restored Deleted (2/14) within 90 days, and the applicable administrative requirements and implementation procedures will be forwarded to the NRC on Superseded by ISE February 28, 2014 with the second NMPNS Overall Integrated Plan RAIs status update.

Table 3 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs NMP2 ISE RAIs Status

1. Confirm that the correct elevation for Level 2 at NMP2 is 335 ft. 11.9 Started (8/14) in. and provide the information regarding specific requirements of the procedure controlling irradiated equipment or materials stored in the SFP, including details of the analysis to be performed to determine the projected dose rate impact and the appropriate Level 2 value as a result of the potential for irradiated material to be stored in the SPF in the future.
2. Provide a final labeled sketch or marked-up plant drawing of the plan Started (2/14) view of the SFP, depicting the SFP inside dimensions, the planned locations/placement of the primary and back-up SFP level sensor, and the proposed routing of the cables that will extend from these sensors toward the location of the read-out/display device.
3. Provide the results of the analyses used to verify the design criteria Started (2/14) and methodology for seismic testing of the SFP instrumentation and the electronics units, including, design basis maximum seismic loads and the hydrodynamic loads that could result from pool sloshing or other effects that could accompany such seismic forces.
4. For each of the mounting attachments required to attach SFP Level Started (2/14) equipment to plant structures, please describe the design inputs, and the methodology that was used to qualify the structural integrity of the affected structures/equipment.
5. Provide information indicating (a) whether the 80c rating for the sensor Started (2/14) electronics is a continuous duty rating; and, (b) what will be the maximum expected ambient temperature in the room in which the sensor electronics will be located under BDB conditions in which there is no ac power available to run Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems.

Page 4 of 7

ATTACHMENT (2)

AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 3 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs (continued)

6. Provide information indicating the maximum expected relative humidity Started (2/14) in the room in which the sensor electronics will be located under BOB conditions, in which there is no ac power available to run HVAC systems, and whether the sensor electronics is capable of continuously performing its required functions under this expected humidity condition.
7. Provide analysis of the maximum expected radiological conditions Started (2/14)

(dose rate and total integrated dose) to which the sensor and associated co-located electronic equipment will be exposed. Also, please provide documentation indicating how it was determined that the electronics for this equipment is capable of withstanding a total integrated dose of 1X10 3 Rads. Please discuss the time period over which the analyzed total integrated dose was applied.

8. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative Started (2/14) sensor design, the shock test method, test results, and forces applied to the sensor applicable to its successful tests demonstrating that the referenced previous testing provides an appropriate means to demonstrate reliability of the sensor under the effects of severe shock.
9. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative Started (2/14) sensor design, the vibration test method, test results, and the forces and their frequency ranges and directions applied to the sensor applicable to its successful tests, demonstrating that the referenced previous testing provides an appropriate means to demonstrate reliability of the sensor under the effects of high vibration.
10. Provide information describing the evaluation of the comparative Started (2/14) display panel ratings against postulated plant conditions. Also provide results of the manufacturer's shock and vibration test methods, test results, and the forces and their frequency ranges and directions applied to the display panel associated with its successful tests.
11. Provide the results of seismic testing per IEEE 344-2004, to Started (2/14) demonstrate the reliability of the components within the power and control panel with regard to shock and vibration effects.
12. Provide analysis of the seismic testing results and show that the Started (2/14) instrument performance reliability, following exposure to simulated seismic conditions representative of the environment anticipated for the SFP structures at Nine Mile Point, has been adequately demonstrated.
13. Provide the final configuration of the power supply source for each Started (2/14) channel so that the staff may conclude that the two channels are independent from a power supply assignment perspective.

Page 5 of 7

ATTACHMENT (2)

AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION Table 3 Status of NMP2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation ISE RAIs (continued)

14. Provide the results of the calculation depicting the battery backup duty Started (2/14) cycle requirements demonstrating that its capacity is sufficient to maintain the level indication function until offsite resource availability is reasonably assured.
15. Provide analysis verifying that the proposed instrument performance is Started (2/14) consistent with these estimated accuracy normal and 6DB values.

Please demonstrate that the channels will retain these accuracy performance values following a loss of power and subsequent restoration of power.

16. Provide a list of the procedures addressing operation (both normal and Started (8/14) abnormal response), calibration, test, maintenance, and inspection procedures that will be developed for use of the spent SFP instrumentation. The licensee is requested to include a brief description of the specific technical objectives to be achieved within each procedure.
17. Provide the following:

Started (8/14)

a. Further information describing the maintenance and testing program the licensee will establish and implement to ensure that regular testing and calibration is performed and verified by inspection and audit to demonstrate conformance with design and system readiness requirements. Please include a description of the plans for ensuring that necessary channel checks, functional tests, periodic calibration, and maintenance will be conducted for the level measurement system and its supporting equipment.
b. Information describing compensatory actions when both channels are out-of-order, and the implementation procedures
c. Additional information describing expedited and compensatory actions in the maintenance procedure to address when one of the instrument channels cannot be restored to functional status within 90 days
18. Provide a description of the in-situ calibration process at the SFP Started (8/14) location that will result in the channel calibration being maintained at its design accuracy.

7 Potential Interim Safety Evaluation Impacts There are no potential impacts to the Interim Safety Evaluation at this time.

Page 6 of 7

ATTACHMENT (2)

AUGUST 2014 NMP2 6-MONTH STATUS REPORT FOR RELIABLE SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION 8

References.

The following references support the updates to the Overall Integrated Plan described in this enclosure.

1. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Overall Integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), dated February 28, 2013 (ML13066A172)
2. NRC Order Number EA-12-051, Issuance of Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated March 12, 2012 (ML12054A679)
3. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Supplement to Overall Integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated March 8, 2013 (ML13073A155)
4. Letter from M. C. Thadani (NRC) to M. G. Korsnick (CENG), Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Additional Information Re: Overall Integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order EA-12-051)(TAC Nos. MF1131 and MF1 132), dated June 5, 2013 (ML13154A399)
5. Letter from P. M. Swift (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Response to Request for Additional Information Re: Overall integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) (TAC Nos. MF1131 and MF1132), dated July 5, 2013 (ML13197A220)
6. Letter from E. D. Dean (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), dated August 27, 2013 (ML13254A279)
7. Letter from M.C. Thadani (NRC) to J.A. Spina (CENG), Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Interim Staff Evaluation and Request for Additional Information Regarding The Overall Integrated Plan for Implementation of Order EA-12-051, Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (TAC NOS.
MF1131, MF1132,
MF1140, and MF1141),

dated November 15, 2013 (ML13281A205)

8. NEI 12-02, Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051, "To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," Revision 1, August 2012 (ML12240A307)
9. Memorandum from C.A. Hunt (NRC) to M.A. Mitchell (NRC), Summary of the November 26, 2013 Public Meeting to Discuss Industry Responses to Staff Interim Evaluations for Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated December 26, 2013 (ML13347B030)
10. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (CENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), February 2014 Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA 051), dated February 24, 2014 (ML14069A180)

Page 7 of 7

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=L-14-031,_August_2014_Six-Month_Status_Report_in_Response_to_March_12,_2012_Commission_Order_Modifying_Licenses_with_Regard_to_Reliable_Spent_Fuel_Pool_Instrumentation_(Order_Number_EA-12-051)&oldid=5202564"