ML17230A273: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES  
                              NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
                                                REGION III
REGION III  
                                      2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210
2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210  
                                            LISLE, IL 60532-4352
LISLE, IL 60532-4352  
                                            August 18, 2017
Mr. Bryan C. Hanson
August 18, 2017  
Senior VP, Exelon Generation Co., LLC
President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear
Mr. Bryan C. Hanson  
4300 Winfield Road
Senior VP, Exelon Generation Co., LLC  
Warrenville, IL 60555
President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear  
SUBJECT: DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3NOTIFICATION
4300 Winfield Road  
              OF AN NRC TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION AND
Warrenville, IL 60555  
              REQUEST FOR INFORMATION; INSPECTION REPORT 05000237/2017004;
SUBJECT: DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3NOTIFICATION  
              05000249/2017004
OF AN NRC TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION AND  
Dear Mr. Hanson:
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION; INSPECTION REPORT 05000237/2017004;  
On October 16, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin the onsite
05000249/2017004  
portion of the Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection at your Dresden Nuclear Power
Dear Mr. Hanson:  
Station, Units 2 and 3. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC baseline
On October 16, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin the onsite  
Inspection Procedure 71111.07.
portion of the Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection at your Dresden Nuclear Power  
In order to minimize the impact that the inspection has on the site and to ensure a productive
Station, Units 2 and 3. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC baseline  
inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for the inspection. The
Inspection Procedure 71111.07.  
documents have been divided into three groups.
In order to minimize the impact that the inspection has on the site and to ensure a productive  
      The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping
inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for the inspection. The  
        activities. This information should be available to the lead inspector no later than
documents have been divided into three groups.  
        September 5, 2017. By September 12, 2017, the inspector will communicate the initial
        selected set of approximately 2-3 risk-significant heat exchangers.
The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping  
      The second group is needed to support our in-office preparation activities. This set of
activities. This information should be available to the lead inspector no later than  
        documents, including the calculations associated with the selected heat exchangers,
September 5, 2017. By September 12, 2017, the inspector will communicate the initial  
        should be available at the Regional Office no later than October 3, 2017. This
selected set of approximately 2-3 risk-significant heat exchangers.  
        information should be separated for each selected component, especially if provided
        electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations, condition
The second group is needed to support our in-office preparation activities. This set of  
        reports, maintenance history, etc.). During the in-office preparation activities, the
documents, including the calculations associated with the selected heat exchangers,  
        inspector may identify additional information needed to support the inspection.
should be available at the Regional Office no later than October 3, 2017. This  
      The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific
information should be separated for each selected component, especially if provided  
        reference material. This information should be available onsite to the inspector on
electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations, condition  
        October 16, 2017. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or
reports, maintenance history, etc.). During the in-office preparation activities, the  
        questions developed during the inspection be provided to the inspector as the
inspector may identify additional information needed to support the inspection.  
        documents are generated.
The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific  
reference material. This information should be available onsite to the inspector on  
October 16, 2017. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or  
questions developed during the inspection be provided to the inspector as the  
documents are generated.  


B. Hanson                                     -2-
B. Hanson  
All requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back
-2-  
to the documents that were provided in response to the previous Heat Sink Performance
All requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back  
Inspection. If no activities were accomplished in that time period, then the request applies to
to the documents that were provided in response to the previous Heat Sink Performance  
the last applicable document in the previous time period. It is important that these documents
Inspection. If no activities were accomplished in that time period, then the request applies to  
be as complete as possible, in order to minimize the number of documents requested during
the last applicable document in the previous time period. It is important that these documents  
the preparation week or during the onsite inspection.
be as complete as possible, in order to minimize the number of documents requested during  
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Gerard ODwyer. We understand that our licensing
the preparation week or during the onsite inspection.  
contact for this inspection is Mr. Dean J. Walker of your organization. If there are any questions
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Gerard ODwyer. We understand that our licensing  
about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the lead
contact for this inspection is Mr. Dean J. Walker of your organization. If there are any questions  
inspector at 630-829-9624 or via e-mail at Gerard.ODwyer@nrc.gov.
about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the lead  
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject
inspector at 630-829-9624 or via e-mail at Gerard.ODwyer@nrc.gov.  
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject  
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information  
Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control  
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to  
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the  
Number.
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control  
This letter and its enclosure will be made available for public inspection and copying at
Number.  
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in
This letter and its enclosure will be made available for public inspection and copying at  
accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in  
                                              Sincerely,
accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.  
                                              /RA/
Sincerely,  
                                              Gerard ODwyer, Reactor Inspector
                                              Engineering Branch 2
/RA/  
                                              Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-237; 50-249
License Nos. DPR-19; DPR-25
Gerard ODwyer, Reactor Inspector  
Enclosure:
Engineering Branch 2  
Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection
Division of Reactor Safety
   Document Request
Docket Nos. 50-237; 50-249  
cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
License Nos. DPR-19; DPR-25  
Enclosure:  
Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection  
   Document Request  
cc: Distribution via LISTSERV  


B. Hanson                                 -3-
B. Hanson  
Letter to Bryan C. Hanson from Gerard ODwyer dated August 18, 2017
-3-  
SUBJECT: DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3NOTIFICATION
Letter to Bryan C. Hanson from Gerard ODwyer dated August 18, 2017  
            OF AN NRC TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION AND
SUBJECT: DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3NOTIFICATION  
            REQUEST FOR INFORMATION; INSPECTION REPORT 05000237/2017004;
OF AN NRC TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION AND  
            05000249/2017004
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION; INSPECTION REPORT 05000237/2017004;  
DISTRIBUTION:
05000249/2017004  
Jeremy Bowen
DISTRIBUTION:  
RidsNrrDorlLpl3
Jeremy Bowen  
RidsNrrPMDresden Resource
RidsNrrDorlLpl3  
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
RidsNrrPMDresden Resource  
Cynthia Pederson
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource  
James Trapp
Cynthia Pederson  
Richard Skokowski
James Trapp  
Allan Barker
Richard Skokowski  
Carole Ariano
Allan Barker  
Linda Linn
Carole Ariano  
DRPIII
Linda Linn  
DRSIII
DRPIII  
ROPreports.Resource@nrc.gov
DRSIII  
ADAMS Accession Number ML17230A273
ROPreports.Resource@nrc.gov  
  OFFICE RIII                   RIII             RIII             RIII
  NAME       GODwyer:cl
  DATE       08/18/17
                                OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
ADAMS Accession Number ML17230A273  
OFFICE  
RIII  
RIII  
RIII  
RIII  
NAME  
GODwyer:cl  
DATE  
08/18/17  
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY  


      TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST  
Inspection Report:             05000237/2017004; 05000249/2017004
Enclosure
Inspection Dates:               October 16 - 20, 2017
Inspection Report:  
Inspection Procedure:           IP 71111.07, Heat Sink Performance
05000237/2017004; 05000249/2017004  
Lead Inspector:                 Gerard ODwyer
Inspection Dates:  
                                630-829-9624
October 16 - 20, 2017  
                                Gerard.ODwyer@nrc.gov
Inspection Procedure:  
Please provide the information electronically in pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats,
IP 71111.07, Heat Sink Performance  
preferably on some portable electronic media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD). The portable electronic
Lead Inspector:  
media should contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of
Gerard ODwyer  
use. Information in lists should contain enough information to be easily understood by
630-829-9624  
someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology.
Gerard.ODwyer@nrc.gov
I.     Information Requested By September 5, 2017:
Please provide the information electronically in pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats,  
        1. List of the Generic Letter (GL) 89-13, Service Water System Problems Affecting
preferably on some portable electronic media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD). The portable electronic  
            Safety-Related Equipment, heat exchangers in order of risk significance.
media should contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of  
        2. Copy of heat exchanger performance trending data tracked for each GL 89-13
use. Information in lists should contain enough information to be easily understood by  
            heat exchanger.
someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology.  
        3. List of Corrective Action Program (CAP) documents (with a short description)
I.  
            associated with GL 89-13 heat exchangers, heat sinks, silting, corrosion, fouling,
Information Requested By September 5, 2017:  
            aging, or heat exchanger testing, ultimate heat sink (UHS), and safety-related
1. List of the Generic Letter (GL) 89-13, Service Water System Problems Affecting  
            service and closed cooling water systems for the previous 3 years or since the last
Safety-Related Equipment, heat exchangers in order of risk significance.  
            CAP document list was sent to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the
2. Copy of heat exchanger performance trending data tracked for each GL 89-13  
            previous heat sink performance inspection. The list should include all CAP
heat exchanger.  
            documents not on the last CAP document list.
3. List of Corrective Action Program (CAP) documents (with a short description)  
        4. Copy of any self-assessment done on any of GL 89-13 heat exchangers, UHS, and
associated with GL 89-13 heat exchangers, heat sinks, silting, corrosion, fouling,  
            safety-related service water systems since the last heat sink performance inspection.
aging, or heat exchanger testing, ultimate heat sink (UHS), and safety-related  
        5. Last two System Health Report(s) and maintenance rule system notebooks for all the
service and closed cooling water systems for the previous 3 years or since the last  
            GL 89-13 heat exchangers, UHS, and safety-related service water systems.
CAP document list was sent to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the  
        6. List of engineering-related operator workarounds (with a short description)
previous heat sink performance inspection. The list should include all CAP  
            associated with GL 89-13 heat exchangers. The requested documents are to be for
documents not on the last CAP document list.  
            the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that were
4. Copy of any self-assessment done on any of GL 89-13 heat exchangers, UHS, and  
            provided in response to the previous heat sink performance inspection.
safety-related service water systems since the last heat sink performance inspection.  
        7. List of permanent and temporary modifications (with a short description) associated
5. Last two System Health Report(s) and maintenance rule system notebooks for all the  
            with GL 89-13 heat exchangers, UHS, and safety-related service and closed cooling
GL 89-13 heat exchangers, UHS, and safety-related service water systems.  
            water systems. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the
6. List of engineering-related operator workarounds (with a short description)  
            onsite inspection period back to the documents that were provided in response to the
associated with GL 89-13 heat exchangers. The requested documents are to be for  
            previous heat sink performance inspection.
the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that were  
                                                                                          Enclosure
provided in response to the previous heat sink performance inspection.  
7. List of permanent and temporary modifications (with a short description) associated  
with GL 89-13 heat exchangers, UHS, and safety-related service and closed cooling  
water systems. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the  
onsite inspection period back to the documents that were provided in response to the  
previous heat sink performance inspection.  


    TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST  
    8. Electronic copies of the current Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Technical
2
        Specifications, Technical Specifications Basis, and Technical Report Manual.
8. Electronic copies of the current Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Technical  
    9. List of enhancements and/or commitments made during license renewal for
Specifications, Technical Specifications Basis, and Technical Report Manual.  
        GL 89-13 heat exchangers, UHS, and safety-related service water systems
9. List of enhancements and/or commitments made during license renewal for  
        (as applicable).
GL 89-13 heat exchangers, UHS, and safety-related service water systems  
II. Information Requested By October 3, 2017:
(as applicable).  
    1. Copies of the GL 89-13 responses.
II.  
    2. Copies of procedures developed to implement the recommendations of GL 89-13
Information Requested By October 3, 2017:  
        (e.g., the GL 89-13 Heat Exchanger Program description).
1. Copies of the GL 89-13 responses.
    3. Copies of the selected CAP documents.
2. Copies of procedures developed to implement the recommendations of GL 89-13  
    4. For the specific heat exchangers selected:
(e.g., the GL 89-13 Heat Exchanger Program description).
        a. Copy of system descriptions and applicable Updated FSAR sections for the heat
3. Copies of the selected CAP documents.  
            exchangers (as applicable).
4. For the specific heat exchangers selected:  
        b. Provide a list of calculations (with a short description) which currently apply to
a. Copy of system descriptions and applicable Updated FSAR sections for the heat  
            each heat exchanger.
exchangers (as applicable).  
        c. Provide the calculations or evaluations that:
b. Provide a list of calculations (with a short description) which currently apply to  
                    i. establish the limiting design basis heat load required to be removed by
each heat exchanger.  
                        each of these heat exchangers;
c. Provide the calculations or evaluations that:  
                    ii. demonstrate the heat exchangers capacity to remove the limiting heat
i. establish the limiting design basis heat load required to be removed by  
                        load;
each of these heat exchangers;  
                  iii. correlate surveillance testing and/or inspection results from these heat
ii. demonstrate the heat exchangers capacity to remove the limiting heat  
                        exchangers with design basis heat removal capability (e.g., basis for
load;  
                        surveillance test and/or inspection acceptance criteria);
iii. correlate surveillance testing and/or inspection results from these heat  
                  iv. evaluate the potential for water hammer in each heat exchanger or
exchangers with design basis heat removal capability (e.g., basis for  
                        associated piping; and
surveillance test and/or inspection acceptance criteria);  
                    v. evaluate excessive tube vibration in each heat exchanger.
iv. evaluate the potential for water hammer in each heat exchanger or  
        d. Copy of any operability determinations or other documentation of degradation
associated piping; and
            associated with the heat exchangers or the systems that support the operation
v. evaluate excessive tube vibration in each heat exchanger.  
            for the selected heat exchangers.
d. Copy of any operability determinations or other documentation of degradation  
        e. Copy of the design specification, heat exchanger data sheets, and vendor
associated with the heat exchangers or the systems that support the operation  
            documents including component drawings applicable for the selected heat
for the selected heat exchangers.  
            exchangers.
e. Copy of the design specification, heat exchanger data sheets, and vendor  
        f. Copies of normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures associated
documents including component drawings applicable for the selected heat  
            with the selected heat exchangers.
exchangers.  
                                                2
f. Copies of normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures associated  
with the selected heat exchangers.  


TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST  
    g. Copies of the Aging Management Programs (AMP) and the implementing
3
        procedures that manage aging of the selected heat exchangers (as applicable).
g. Copies of the Aging Management Programs (AMP) and the implementing  
5. For the UHS and the safety-related service water systems (or equivalent):
procedures that manage aging of the selected heat exchangers (as applicable).  
    a. Copy of system description and applicable Updated FSAR sections
5. For the UHS and the safety-related service water systems (or equivalent):  
        (as applicable).
a. Copy of system description and applicable Updated FSAR sections  
    b. Copy of any operability determinations or other documentation of degradation
(as applicable).  
        associated with the UHS and the safety-related service water systems.
b. Copy of any operability determinations or other documentation of degradation  
    c. Copy of the document (e.g., Updated FSAR or Technical Requirements Manual)
associated with the UHS and the safety-related service water systems.  
        that states the maximum cooling water system inlet temperature limit that still
c. Copy of the document (e.g., Updated FSAR or Technical Requirements Manual)  
        allows full licensed power operation of the nuclear reactor.
that states the maximum cooling water system inlet temperature limit that still  
    d. Copy of system description and design basis document (as applicable).
allows full licensed power operation of the nuclear reactor.  
    e. Copy of the construction code and Design Specification.
d. Copy of system description and design basis document (as applicable).  
    f. Copies of normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures associated
e. Copy of the construction code and Design Specification.  
        with the UHS and safety-related service systems including procedures for loss of
f. Copies of normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures associated  
        these systems.
with the UHS and safety-related service systems including procedures for loss of  
    g. Copies of CAP documents associated with waterhammer or hydraulic transients
these systems.  
        in the safety-related service water systems since the last Heat Sink Inspection.
g. Copies of CAP documents associated with waterhammer or hydraulic transients  
    h. If available, provide an electronic copy of piping and instrumentation diagrams for
in the safety-related service water systems since the last Heat Sink Inspection.  
        the service water systems, including the intake structure.
h. If available, provide an electronic copy of piping and instrumentation diagrams for  
    i. Provide a list of calculations (with a short description), which currently apply to
the service water systems, including the intake structure.  
        the UHS and safety-related service water systems.
i.  
    j. Provide a list of instruments (with a short description) associated with automatic
Provide a list of calculations (with a short description), which currently apply to  
        or alarm functions for the UHS and safety-related service water systems.
the UHS and safety-related service water systems.  
    k. Provide a list of any design change (with a short description) performed on
j.  
        the UHS and safety-related service water systems since the last heat sink
Provide a list of instruments (with a short description) associated with automatic  
        performance inspection.
or alarm functions for the UHS and safety-related service water systems.  
    l. Copies of the AMPs and the implementing procedures that manage aging of
k. Provide a list of any design change (with a short description) performed on  
        the UHS (including the intake structure) and the safety-related service (as
the UHS and safety-related service water systems since the last heat sink  
        applicable).
performance inspection.  
6. A schedule of all inspections, cleanings, maintenance, or testing of any
l.  
    safety-related plant heat exchanger to be performed during the onsite portion
Copies of the AMPs and the implementing procedures that manage aging of  
    of the inspection.
the UHS (including the intake structure) and the safety-related service (as  
                                          3
applicable).  
6. A schedule of all inspections, cleanings, maintenance, or testing of any  
safety-related plant heat exchanger to be performed during the onsite portion  
of the inspection.  


    TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST  
III. Information Requested to be Available on First Day of Inspection,
4
      October 16, 2017:
III.  
      1. For the specific heat exchangers selected.
Information Requested to be Available on First Day of Inspection,  
          a. Copy of the calculation which correlates surveillance testing results from these
October 16, 2017:  
            heat exchangers with design basis heat removal capability (e.g., basis for
1. For the specific heat exchangers selected.  
            surveillance test acceptance criteria).
a. Copy of the calculation which correlates surveillance testing results from these  
          b. Copies of the two most recent completed tests and evaluation data confirming
heat exchangers with design basis heat removal capability (e.g., basis for  
            thermal performance for those heat exchangers which are performance tested.
surveillance test acceptance criteria).
          c. Documentation and procedures that identify the types, accuracy, and location of
b. Copies of the two most recent completed tests and evaluation data confirming  
            any special instrumentation used for the two most recently completed thermal
thermal performance for those heat exchangers which are performance tested.  
            performance tests for the heat exchangers (e.g., high accuracy ultrasonic flow
c. Documentation and procedures that identify the types, accuracy, and location of  
            instruments or temperature instruments). Include calibration records for the
any special instrumentation used for the two most recently completed thermal  
            instruments used during these tests.
performance tests for the heat exchangers (e.g., high accuracy ultrasonic flow  
          d. Information regarding any alarms which monitor on-line performance.
instruments or temperature instruments). Include calibration records for the  
          e. Copy of the document describing the inspection results of each heat exchanger.
instruments used during these tests.  
            The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection
d. Information regarding any alarms which monitor on-line performance.  
            period back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous
e. Copy of the document describing the inspection results of each heat exchanger.
            heat sink performance inspection.
The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection  
          f. The cleaning and inspection maintenance schedule for each heat exchanger for
period back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous  
            the next 5 years.
heat sink performance inspection.  
          g. Copy of the calculation which establishes the limiting (maximum) design basis
f. The cleaning and inspection maintenance schedule for each heat exchanger for  
            heat load which is required to be removed by each of these heat exchangers.
the next 5 years.  
          h. Copy of the operating procedure that ensures that the maximum cooling water
g. Copy of the calculation which establishes the limiting (maximum) design basis  
            system inlet temperature limit is not exceeded.
heat load which is required to be removed by each of these heat exchangers.  
          i. Copy of the calculations or documents which evaluate the potential for water
h. Copy of the operating procedure that ensures that the maximum cooling water  
            hammer in each heat exchanger or associated piping.
system inlet temperature limit is not exceeded.
          j. Copy of the calculations that evaluate excessive tube vibration in each heat
i.  
            exchanger and the documents that describe the controls that prevent heat
Copy of the calculations or documents which evaluate the potential for water  
            exchanger degradation due to excessive flow induced vibration during operation.
hammer in each heat exchanger or associated piping.  
          k. Copy of the periodic flow testing at or near maximum design flow. The requested
j.  
            documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to
Copy of the calculations that evaluate excessive tube vibration in each heat  
            the documents that were provided in response to the previous heat sink
exchanger and the documents that describe the controls that prevent heat  
            performance inspection.
exchanger degradation due to excessive flow induced vibration during operation.  
          l. Copy of the document which identifies the current number of tubes in service for
k. Copy of the periodic flow testing at or near maximum design flow. The requested  
            each heat exchanger and the supporting calculation which establishes the
documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to  
            maximum number of tubes which can be plugged in each heat exchanger.
the documents that were provided in response to the previous heat sink  
          m. Copy of the document establishing the repair criteria (plugging limit) for degraded
performance inspection.  
            tubes which are identified in each heat exchanger.
l.  
                                              4
Copy of the document which identifies the current number of tubes in service for  
each heat exchanger and the supporting calculation which establishes the  
maximum number of tubes which can be plugged in each heat exchanger.  
m. Copy of the document establishing the repair criteria (plugging limit) for degraded  
tubes which are identified in each heat exchanger.  


TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST  
    n. Copies of the documents that verify the structural integrity of the heat exchanger
5
        (e.g., eddy current summary sheets, ultrasonic testing results, and visual
n. Copies of the documents that verify the structural integrity of the heat exchanger  
        inspection results).
(e.g., eddy current summary sheets, ultrasonic testing results, and visual  
    o. Copies of those documents that describe the methods taken to control water
inspection results).
        chemistry in the heat exchangers, including those credited by any AMPs (as
o. Copies of those documents that describe the methods taken to control water  
        applicable).
chemistry in the heat exchangers, including those credited by any AMPs (as  
    p. Copies of any credited AMP monitoring/inspection results for the selected heat
applicable).
        exchangers (as applicable). The requested documents are to be for any
p. Copies of any credited AMP monitoring/inspection results for the selected heat  
        completed monitoring/inspection in the time period from the onsite inspection
exchangers (as applicable). The requested documents are to be for any  
        period back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous
completed monitoring/inspection in the time period from the onsite inspection  
        heat sink performance inspection.
period back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous  
2. For the review of the operation of the safety-related service water systems and the
heat sink performance inspection.  
    UHS:
2. For the review of the operation of the safety-related service water systems and the  
    a. Copies of any design changes performed on the UHS. The requested
UHS:  
        documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back
a. Copies of any design changes performed on the UHS. The requested  
        to the documents that were provided in response to the previous heat sink
documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back  
        performance inspection.
to the documents that were provided in response to the previous heat sink  
    b. Copies of any design change performed on the safety-related service water
performance inspection.  
        systems. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite
b. Copies of any design change performed on the safety-related service water  
        inspection period back to the documents that were provided in response to the
systems. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite  
        previous heat sink performance inspection.
inspection period back to the documents that were provided in response to the  
    c. Copies of procedures for a loss of UHS.
previous heat sink performance inspection.  
    d. Copies of procedures for a loss of service water systems.
c. Copies of procedures for a loss of UHS.  
    e. Inspections and/or maintenance related to preventing macrofouling (e.g., silt,
d. Copies of procedures for a loss of service water systems.  
        dead mussel shells, or debris) and biotic fouling (e.g., fish, algae, grass, or kelp).
e. Inspections and/or maintenance related to preventing macrofouling (e.g., silt,  
        The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection
dead mussel shells, or debris) and biotic fouling (e.g., fish, algae, grass, or kelp).
        period back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous
The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection  
        heat sink performance inspection.
period back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous  
    f. Copies of documents associated with the monitoring of pump performance for
heat sink performance inspection.  
        potential strong-pump vs. weak-pump interaction.
f. Copies of documents associated with the monitoring of pump performance for  
3. For the review associated with the system walkdown of the service water intake
potential strong-pump vs. weak-pump interaction.  
    structure:
3. For the review associated with the system walkdown of the service water intake  
    a. Copies of documentation that demonstrates proper functioning of the traveling
structure:  
        screens and strainers including backwash strainer function, (e.g., copies of the
a. Copies of documentation that demonstrates proper functioning of the traveling  
        last two inspections and surveillances associated with service water strainers,
screens and strainers including backwash strainer function, (e.g., copies of the  
        traveling screens and trash racks).
last two inspections and surveillances associated with service water strainers,  
    b. List of preventive maintenance, including frequency, associated with service
traveling screens and trash racks).  
        water strainers, traveling screens and trash racks
b. List of preventive maintenance, including frequency, associated with service  
                                          5
water strainers, traveling screens and trash racks  


        TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST  
            c. Copies of abnormal procedures for the traveling screens and service water
6
                strainers.
c. Copies of abnormal procedures for the traveling screens and service water  
            d. Copies of the last two inspections and/or surveillances documenting that
strainers.
                component mounts have not excessively degraded (i.e., due to corrosion). For
d. Copies of the last two inspections and/or surveillances documenting that  
                example, inspections for the mounts for the service water pumps, service water
component mounts have not excessively degraded (i.e., due to corrosion). For  
                strainers, traveling screens and trash racks.
example, inspections for the mounts for the service water pumps, service water  
            e. Copies of the documents associated with the monitoring, trending, and
strainers, traveling screens and trash racks.
                remediation of silt accumulation at the service water pump bay.
e. Copies of the documents associated with the monitoring, trending, and  
            f. Copies of surveillance procedures and testing results performed on the service
remediation of silt accumulation at the service water pump bay.  
                water pump bay water level instruments. The requested documents are to be for
f. Copies of surveillance procedures and testing results performed on the service  
                the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that
water pump bay water level instruments. The requested documents are to be for  
                were provided in response to the previous heat sink performance inspection.
the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that  
            g. Copies of procedures associated with operating during adverse weather
were provided in response to the previous heat sink performance inspection.  
                conditions (e.g., icing especially frazil icing, high temperatures, or low level).
g. Copies of procedures associated with operating during adverse weather  
            h. Copy of the evaluation for the potential effects of low flow/level on underwater
conditions (e.g., icing especially frazil icing, high temperatures, or low level).  
                weir walls intended to limit silt or sand intake, if applicable.
h. Copy of the evaluation for the potential effects of low flow/level on underwater  
            i. Copies of any credited AMP monitoring/inspection results for the safety-related
weir walls intended to limit silt or sand intake, if applicable.  
                service and closed cooling water systems, and the UHS (as applicable). The
i.  
                requested documents are to be for any completed monitoring/inspection in the
Copies of any credited AMP monitoring/inspection results for the safety-related  
                time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that were
service and closed cooling water systems, and the UHS (as applicable). The  
                provided in response to the previous heat sink performance inspection.
requested documents are to be for any completed monitoring/inspection in the  
If the information requested above will not be available, please contact Gerard ODwyer as soon
time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that were  
provided in response to the previous heat sink performance inspection.  
If the information requested above will not be available, please contact Gerard ODwyer as soon  
as possible at 630-829-9624 or e-mail Gerard.ODwyer@nrc.gov.
as possible at 630-829-9624 or e-mail Gerard.ODwyer@nrc.gov.
                                                    6
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 12:56, 8 January 2025

Notification of an NRC Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection and Request for Information; Inspection Report 05000237/2017004; 05000249/2017004 (Gfo)
ML17230A273
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/18/2017
From: O'Dwyer G
Division of Reactor Safety III
To: Bryan Hanson
Exelon Generation Co
References
IR 2017004
Download: ML17230A273 (9)


See also: IR 05000237/2017004

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210

LISLE, IL 60532-4352

August 18, 2017

Mr. Bryan C. Hanson

Senior VP, Exelon Generation Co., LLC

President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear

4300 Winfield Road

Warrenville, IL 60555

SUBJECT: DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3NOTIFICATION

OF AN NRC TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION AND

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION; INSPECTION REPORT 05000237/2017004;

05000249/2017004

Dear Mr. Hanson:

On October 16, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin the onsite

portion of the Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection at your Dresden Nuclear Power

Station, Units 2 and 3. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC baseline

Inspection Procedure 71111.07.

In order to minimize the impact that the inspection has on the site and to ensure a productive

inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for the inspection. The

documents have been divided into three groups.

The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping

activities. This information should be available to the lead inspector no later than

September 5, 2017. By September 12, 2017, the inspector will communicate the initial

selected set of approximately 2-3 risk-significant heat exchangers.

The second group is needed to support our in-office preparation activities. This set of

documents, including the calculations associated with the selected heat exchangers,

should be available at the Regional Office no later than October 3, 2017. This

information should be separated for each selected component, especially if provided

electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations, condition

reports, maintenance history, etc.). During the in-office preparation activities, the

inspector may identify additional information needed to support the inspection.

The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific

reference material. This information should be available onsite to the inspector on

October 16, 2017. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or

questions developed during the inspection be provided to the inspector as the

documents are generated.

B. Hanson

-2-

All requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back

to the documents that were provided in response to the previous Heat Sink Performance

Inspection. If no activities were accomplished in that time period, then the request applies to

the last applicable document in the previous time period. It is important that these documents

be as complete as possible, in order to minimize the number of documents requested during

the preparation week or during the onsite inspection.

The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Gerard ODwyer. We understand that our licensing

contact for this inspection is Mr. Dean J. Walker of your organization. If there are any questions

about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the lead

inspector at 630-829-9624 or via e-mail at Gerard.ODwyer@nrc.gov.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control

Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control

Number.

This letter and its enclosure will be made available for public inspection and copying at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in

accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Gerard ODwyer, Reactor Inspector

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-237; 50-249

License Nos. DPR-19; DPR-25

Enclosure:

Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection

Document Request

cc: Distribution via LISTSERV

B. Hanson

-3-

Letter to Bryan C. Hanson from Gerard ODwyer dated August 18, 2017

SUBJECT: DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3NOTIFICATION

OF AN NRC TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION AND

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION; INSPECTION REPORT 05000237/2017004;

05000249/2017004

DISTRIBUTION:

Jeremy Bowen

RidsNrrDorlLpl3

RidsNrrPMDresden Resource

RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource

Cynthia Pederson

James Trapp

Richard Skokowski

Allan Barker

Carole Ariano

Linda Linn

DRPIII

DRSIII

ROPreports.Resource@nrc.gov

ADAMS Accession Number ML17230A273

OFFICE

RIII

RIII

RIII

RIII

NAME

GODwyer:cl

DATE

08/18/17

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

Enclosure

Inspection Report: 05000237/2017004; 05000249/2017004

Inspection Dates:

October 16 - 20, 2017

Inspection Procedure:

IP 71111.07, Heat Sink Performance

Lead Inspector:

Gerard ODwyer

630-829-9624

Gerard.ODwyer@nrc.gov

Please provide the information electronically in pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats,

preferably on some portable electronic media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD). The portable electronic

media should contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of

use. Information in lists should contain enough information to be easily understood by

someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology.

I.

Information Requested By September 5, 2017:

1. List of the Generic Letter (GL) 89-13, Service Water System Problems Affecting

Safety-Related Equipment, heat exchangers in order of risk significance.

2. Copy of heat exchanger performance trending data tracked for each GL 89-13

heat exchanger.

3. List of Corrective Action Program (CAP) documents (with a short description)

associated with GL 89-13 heat exchangers, heat sinks, silting, corrosion, fouling,

aging, or heat exchanger testing, ultimate heat sink (UHS), and safety-related

service and closed cooling water systems for the previous 3 years or since the last

CAP document list was sent to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the

previous heat sink performance inspection. The list should include all CAP

documents not on the last CAP document list.

4. Copy of any self-assessment done on any of GL 89-13 heat exchangers, UHS, and

safety-related service water systems since the last heat sink performance inspection.

5. Last two System Health Report(s) and maintenance rule system notebooks for all the

GL 89-13 heat exchangers, UHS, and safety-related service water systems.

6. List of engineering-related operator workarounds (with a short description)

associated with GL 89-13 heat exchangers. The requested documents are to be for

the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that were

provided in response to the previous heat sink performance inspection.

7. List of permanent and temporary modifications (with a short description) associated

with GL 89-13 heat exchangers, UHS, and safety-related service and closed cooling

water systems. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the

onsite inspection period back to the documents that were provided in response to the

previous heat sink performance inspection.

TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

2

8. Electronic copies of the current Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Technical

Specifications, Technical Specifications Basis, and Technical Report Manual.

9. List of enhancements and/or commitments made during license renewal for

GL 89-13 heat exchangers, UHS, and safety-related service water systems

(as applicable).

II.

Information Requested By October 3, 2017:

1. Copies of the GL 89-13 responses.

2. Copies of procedures developed to implement the recommendations of GL 89-13

(e.g., the GL 89-13 Heat Exchanger Program description).

3. Copies of the selected CAP documents.

4. For the specific heat exchangers selected:

a. Copy of system descriptions and applicable Updated FSAR sections for the heat

exchangers (as applicable).

b. Provide a list of calculations (with a short description) which currently apply to

each heat exchanger.

c. Provide the calculations or evaluations that:

i. establish the limiting design basis heat load required to be removed by

each of these heat exchangers;

ii. demonstrate the heat exchangers capacity to remove the limiting heat

load;

iii. correlate surveillance testing and/or inspection results from these heat

exchangers with design basis heat removal capability (e.g., basis for

surveillance test and/or inspection acceptance criteria);

iv. evaluate the potential for water hammer in each heat exchanger or

associated piping; and

v. evaluate excessive tube vibration in each heat exchanger.

d. Copy of any operability determinations or other documentation of degradation

associated with the heat exchangers or the systems that support the operation

for the selected heat exchangers.

e. Copy of the design specification, heat exchanger data sheets, and vendor

documents including component drawings applicable for the selected heat

exchangers.

f. Copies of normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures associated

with the selected heat exchangers.

TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

3

g. Copies of the Aging Management Programs (AMP) and the implementing

procedures that manage aging of the selected heat exchangers (as applicable).

5. For the UHS and the safety-related service water systems (or equivalent):

a. Copy of system description and applicable Updated FSAR sections

(as applicable).

b. Copy of any operability determinations or other documentation of degradation

associated with the UHS and the safety-related service water systems.

c. Copy of the document (e.g., Updated FSAR or Technical Requirements Manual)

that states the maximum cooling water system inlet temperature limit that still

allows full licensed power operation of the nuclear reactor.

d. Copy of system description and design basis document (as applicable).

e. Copy of the construction code and Design Specification.

f. Copies of normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures associated

with the UHS and safety-related service systems including procedures for loss of

these systems.

g. Copies of CAP documents associated with waterhammer or hydraulic transients

in the safety-related service water systems since the last Heat Sink Inspection.

h. If available, provide an electronic copy of piping and instrumentation diagrams for

the service water systems, including the intake structure.

i.

Provide a list of calculations (with a short description), which currently apply to

the UHS and safety-related service water systems.

j.

Provide a list of instruments (with a short description) associated with automatic

or alarm functions for the UHS and safety-related service water systems.

k. Provide a list of any design change (with a short description) performed on

the UHS and safety-related service water systems since the last heat sink

performance inspection.

l.

Copies of the AMPs and the implementing procedures that manage aging of

the UHS (including the intake structure) and the safety-related service (as

applicable).

6. A schedule of all inspections, cleanings, maintenance, or testing of any

safety-related plant heat exchanger to be performed during the onsite portion

of the inspection.

TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

4

III.

Information Requested to be Available on First Day of Inspection,

October 16, 2017:

1. For the specific heat exchangers selected.

a. Copy of the calculation which correlates surveillance testing results from these

heat exchangers with design basis heat removal capability (e.g., basis for

surveillance test acceptance criteria).

b. Copies of the two most recent completed tests and evaluation data confirming

thermal performance for those heat exchangers which are performance tested.

c. Documentation and procedures that identify the types, accuracy, and location of

any special instrumentation used for the two most recently completed thermal

performance tests for the heat exchangers (e.g., high accuracy ultrasonic flow

instruments or temperature instruments). Include calibration records for the

instruments used during these tests.

d. Information regarding any alarms which monitor on-line performance.

e. Copy of the document describing the inspection results of each heat exchanger.

The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection

period back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous

heat sink performance inspection.

f. The cleaning and inspection maintenance schedule for each heat exchanger for

the next 5 years.

g. Copy of the calculation which establishes the limiting (maximum) design basis

heat load which is required to be removed by each of these heat exchangers.

h. Copy of the operating procedure that ensures that the maximum cooling water

system inlet temperature limit is not exceeded.

i.

Copy of the calculations or documents which evaluate the potential for water

hammer in each heat exchanger or associated piping.

j.

Copy of the calculations that evaluate excessive tube vibration in each heat

exchanger and the documents that describe the controls that prevent heat

exchanger degradation due to excessive flow induced vibration during operation.

k. Copy of the periodic flow testing at or near maximum design flow. The requested

documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to

the documents that were provided in response to the previous heat sink

performance inspection.

l.

Copy of the document which identifies the current number of tubes in service for

each heat exchanger and the supporting calculation which establishes the

maximum number of tubes which can be plugged in each heat exchanger.

m. Copy of the document establishing the repair criteria (plugging limit) for degraded

tubes which are identified in each heat exchanger.

TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

5

n. Copies of the documents that verify the structural integrity of the heat exchanger

(e.g., eddy current summary sheets, ultrasonic testing results, and visual

inspection results).

o. Copies of those documents that describe the methods taken to control water

chemistry in the heat exchangers, including those credited by any AMPs (as

applicable).

p. Copies of any credited AMP monitoring/inspection results for the selected heat

exchangers (as applicable). The requested documents are to be for any

completed monitoring/inspection in the time period from the onsite inspection

period back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous

heat sink performance inspection.

2. For the review of the operation of the safety-related service water systems and the

UHS:

a. Copies of any design changes performed on the UHS. The requested

documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back

to the documents that were provided in response to the previous heat sink

performance inspection.

b. Copies of any design change performed on the safety-related service water

systems. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite

inspection period back to the documents that were provided in response to the

previous heat sink performance inspection.

c. Copies of procedures for a loss of UHS.

d. Copies of procedures for a loss of service water systems.

e. Inspections and/or maintenance related to preventing macrofouling (e.g., silt,

dead mussel shells, or debris) and biotic fouling (e.g., fish, algae, grass, or kelp).

The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection

period back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous

heat sink performance inspection.

f. Copies of documents associated with the monitoring of pump performance for

potential strong-pump vs. weak-pump interaction.

3. For the review associated with the system walkdown of the service water intake

structure:

a. Copies of documentation that demonstrates proper functioning of the traveling

screens and strainers including backwash strainer function, (e.g., copies of the

last two inspections and surveillances associated with service water strainers,

traveling screens and trash racks).

b. List of preventive maintenance, including frequency, associated with service

water strainers, traveling screens and trash racks

TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

6

c. Copies of abnormal procedures for the traveling screens and service water

strainers.

d. Copies of the last two inspections and/or surveillances documenting that

component mounts have not excessively degraded (i.e., due to corrosion). For

example, inspections for the mounts for the service water pumps, service water

strainers, traveling screens and trash racks.

e. Copies of the documents associated with the monitoring, trending, and

remediation of silt accumulation at the service water pump bay.

f. Copies of surveillance procedures and testing results performed on the service

water pump bay water level instruments. The requested documents are to be for

the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that

were provided in response to the previous heat sink performance inspection.

g. Copies of procedures associated with operating during adverse weather

conditions (e.g., icing especially frazil icing, high temperatures, or low level).

h. Copy of the evaluation for the potential effects of low flow/level on underwater

weir walls intended to limit silt or sand intake, if applicable.

i.

Copies of any credited AMP monitoring/inspection results for the safety-related

service and closed cooling water systems, and the UHS (as applicable). The

requested documents are to be for any completed monitoring/inspection in the

time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that were

provided in response to the previous heat sink performance inspection.

If the information requested above will not be available, please contact Gerard ODwyer as soon

as possible at 630-829-9624 or e-mail Gerard.ODwyer@nrc.gov.