ML15153B130: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| document type = E-Mail | | document type = E-Mail | ||
| page count = 2 | | page count = 2 | ||
| project = TAC:MF6148, TAC:MF6149 | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Klett, AudreySent:Tuesday, June 02, 2015 2:18 PMTo:Mitch.Guth@fpl.com; Czaya, Paul (Paul.Czaya@fpl.com); 'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)Subject:NRC Staff's LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request (LAR) 237 (TAC Nos. MF6148 and MF6149)Hi Mitch, Paul, Olga, By letter dated April 16, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML15119A222), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested license amendments for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. This email provides the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this applicatio The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plan The NRC staff concluded that the licensee's submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondenc If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-048 Audrey Klett Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 301-415-0489 | |||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2128 Mail Envelope Properties (Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov20150602141800) | |||
Subject: NRC Staff's LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request (LAR) 237 (TAC Nos. MF6148 and MF6149) Sent Date: 6/2/2015 2:18:26 PM Received Date: 6/2/2015 2:18:00 PM From: Klett, Audrey Created By: Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov Recipients: "Mitch.Guth@fpl.com" <Mitch.Guth@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None "Czaya, Paul (Paul.Czaya@fpl.com)" <Paul.Czaya@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None "'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com> | |||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1700 6/2/2015 2:18:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:}} | |||
Revision as of 14:16, 15 March 2018
| ML15153B130 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 06/02/2015 |
| From: | Audrey Klett Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Guth J M Florida Power & Light Group |
| References | |
| TAC MF6148, TAC MF6149 | |
| Download: ML15153B130 (2) | |
Text
1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Klett, AudreySent:Tuesday, June 02, 2015 2:18 PMTo:Mitch.Guth@fpl.com; Czaya, Paul (Paul.Czaya@fpl.com); 'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)Subject:NRC Staff's LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request (LAR) 237 (TAC Nos. MF6148 and MF6149)Hi Mitch, Paul, Olga, By letter dated April 16, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML15119A222), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested license amendments for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. This email provides the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this applicatio The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plan The NRC staff concluded that the licensee's submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondenc If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-048 Audrey Klett Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 301-415-0489
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2128 Mail Envelope Properties (Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov20150602141800)
Subject: NRC Staff's LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request (LAR) 237 (TAC Nos. MF6148 and MF6149) Sent Date: 6/2/2015 2:18:26 PM Received Date: 6/2/2015 2:18:00 PM From: Klett, Audrey Created By: Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov Recipients: "Mitch.Guth@fpl.com" <Mitch.Guth@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None "Czaya, Paul (Paul.Czaya@fpl.com)" <Paul.Czaya@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None "'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1700 6/2/2015 2:18:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: