ML19319E500: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:'t
{{#Wiki_filter:'t
                .o                 m
.o m
                                  ~~
~~
                                          ,        t e Il l. F' l l4 * : ' t 9 9 8 4. 0     A c i os a n' ,.t'
t e Il l. F' l l4 * : ' t 9 9 8 4. 0 A c i os a n'
        \     /
,.t'
I
\\
      !                ARK ANS AS POWER S LIGHT COMPA NY SYN & LOUISI AN A ST A..TS . LITTL. AQCK. A AK ANS AS 7220 3 (509 3 37' J- A 311 July 11, 1975 s                                        ;}                       'j
/
    !                Mr. E. Morris Howard, Director                                                           'C'                       7 Office of Inspection and Enforcement                                                     \E .
I ARK ANS AS POWER S LIGHT COMPA NY SYN & LOUISI AN A ST A..TS. LITTL. AQCK. A AK ANS AS 7220 3 (509 3 37' - A 311 J
Region IV                                                                                         f, U. S. fluclear Regulatory Commission                                                                   f t.T 1 .
July 11, 1975
i 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000                                                                     '
;}
Arlington, Texas       76012
'j s
Mr. E. Morris Howard, Director
'C' 7
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
\\E.
Region IV f,
U. S. fluclear Regulatory Commission f t.T 1 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 i
Arlington, Texas 76012


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Arkansas Power & Light Company 1                                             Arkansas Nuclear One-Unit i Docket No. 50-313
Arkansas Power & Light Company 1
[                                               License No. DPR-51 Cancelling of Non-Routine, Non-A                                       Radiological Environmental Report
Arkansas Nuclear One-Unit i Docket No. 50-313
(       )                             No. 50-313/75-40                                                                                     -
[
AJ                         .
License No. DPR-51 Cancelling of Non-Routine, Non-A Radiological Environmental Report
(
)
No. 50-313/75-40 AJ


==Dear Mr. Howard:==
==Dear Mr. Howard:==
On July 8,1975, we informed you of an increase in conductivity across the plant (from point 20 to the discharge canal) in excess of Environ-mental Technical Specification limits. That telegram which informed you of this occurrence was in error in that the increase was actually 10% vice the 15% noted in the telegram.
We wish to cancel this Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Environmental Report as Environmental Technical Specification 2.3.3 was not exceeded, i.e. the in.: ease was not greater than 10%. We therefore feel that this nccurrence is not reportable under Environmental Techn! cal Specification 7
5.6.2, but rather is within specification limits.
Your comnents on and/or approval of this action is requested, Very truly yo.urs,r
/.
j.1., cl-le p.
%. D. Phillips
.inior Vice President f'')
JDP:1t 8004110 Lj


On July 8,1975, we informed you of an increase in conductivity across the plant (from point 20 to the discharge canal) in excess of Environ-mental Technical Specification limits. That telegram which informed                                                              ,
==
you of this occurrence was in error in that the increase was actually 10% vice the 15% noted in the telegram.                                                                                          ,
g-.-..-.-,........-
We wish to cancel this Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Environmental Report as Environmental Technical Specification 2.3.3 was not exceeded, i.e. the in.: ease was not greater than 10%. We therefore feel that this nccurrence is not reportable under Environmental Techn! cal Specification                                                    7 5.6.2, but rather is within specification limits.
,.KA.
Your comnents on and/or approval of this action is requested, Very truly yo.urs,r .. <
. -.., _..}}
                                                                                              /. -
: p.        :'
j.1. , cl- le
                                                                                    % . D. Phillips
                                                                                      .inior Vice President                                  >
f'')
Lj JDP:1t 8004110 g-.-..-.-,........-
                                                                                                                                                ==
                    ,.KA.       . -.., _ ..}}

Latest revision as of 19:04, 1 January 2025

Requests Cancellation of 750708 Nonroutine Nonradiological Environ Rept 50-313/75-40 Re Conductivity Increase Across Plant Exceeding ETS Limits.Notification Was Erroneous.Ets Limits Not Exceeded & Occurrence Not Reportable
ML19319E500
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear 
Issue date: 07/11/1975
From: Phillips J
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Howard E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML19319E489 List:
References
NUDOCS 8004110748
Download: ML19319E500 (1)


Text

't

.o m

~~

t e Il l. F' l l4 * : ' t 9 9 8 4. 0 A c i os a n'

,.t'

\\

/

I ARK ANS AS POWER S LIGHT COMPA NY SYN & LOUISI AN A ST A..TS. LITTL. AQCK. A AK ANS AS 7220 3 (509 3 37' - A 311 J

July 11, 1975

}

'j s

Mr. E. Morris Howard, Director

'C' 7

Office of Inspection and Enforcement

\\E.

Region IV f,

U. S. fluclear Regulatory Commission f t.T 1 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 i

Arlington, Texas 76012

Subject:

Arkansas Power & Light Company 1

Arkansas Nuclear One-Unit i Docket No. 50-313

[

License No. DPR-51 Cancelling of Non-Routine, Non-A Radiological Environmental Report

(

)

No. 50-313/75-40 AJ

Dear Mr. Howard:

On July 8,1975, we informed you of an increase in conductivity across the plant (from point 20 to the discharge canal) in excess of Environ-mental Technical Specification limits. That telegram which informed you of this occurrence was in error in that the increase was actually 10% vice the 15% noted in the telegram.

We wish to cancel this Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Environmental Report as Environmental Technical Specification 2.3.3 was not exceeded, i.e. the in.: ease was not greater than 10%. We therefore feel that this nccurrence is not reportable under Environmental Techn! cal Specification 7

5.6.2, but rather is within specification limits.

Your comnents on and/or approval of this action is requested, Very truly yo.urs,r

/.

j.1., cl-le p.

%. D. Phillips

.inior Vice President f)

JDP:1t 8004110 Lj

==

g-.-..-.-,........-

,.KA.

. -.., _..