ML20011F086: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-
{{#Wiki_filter:-
      ,                                                                                                      t
t
_y i
_y i
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                                     )khc NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD                             90 R3 26 A11:34 !
)khc UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD 90 R3 26 A11:34 !
  ;-                            Before Administrative Judges                             .
Before Administrative Judges Peter B. Bloch, Chair
A Peter B. Bloch, Chair                                 {.Sck.ddg!.f[hy/d
{.Sck.ddg!.f[hy/d
{
{
Dr. George C. Anderson                                     imANc4       j Elizabeth B. Johnson                                                   i e
A Dr. George C. Anderson imANc4 j
  !                                                                                                          I In the Matter of                   )                           Docket Nos. 50-250-OLA-5           -
Elizabeth B. Johnson e
                                              )                                       50-251-OLA-5 FLORIDA POWER & LICHT               )
i I
COMPANY                       )                           Technical Specifications Turkey Point Plant                 )                                         Replacement (Unit Nos. 3 and 4)               )                                                             4
In the Matter of
                                              )                       ASLBP No. 90-602-01-OLA-5               l Facility Operating                 )                                                             ;
)
Licenses Nos. DPR-31, DPR-41)                               February 19, 1990                     !
Docket Nos. 50-250-OLA-5
                                              )                                                             i MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION On   February     8, 1990   Petitioners Thomas J. Saporito, Jr.,
)
and   the   Nuclear     Energy   Accountability                   Project   requested an         [
50-251-OLA-5 FLORIDA POWER & LICHT
l extension     of   time within which to file an amended petition and                               :
)
l contentions.     The requested extension was from February 20, 1990 i'
COMPANY
I         to March 20, 1990.
)
On   February     17,   1990,   Petitioners                 received the Board's           ;
Technical Specifications Turkey Point Plant
MEMORANDUM     AND   ORDER granting Petitioners an extension of time                             !
)
l l        but-only until March 1,       1990.
Replacement (Unit Nos. 3 and 4)
I,                                                                                                           i l               Petitioners relying solely on the NRC rules of practice and p
)
lacking experience in these administrative proceedings, were not cognizant     that   they   should   have contacted the Applicant, (as                           ,
4
i noted   at page 2 in the Board's ruling of Febr'ary                 u    15, 1990), to 1                                                                                                           .
)
discuss   an   extension of time prior to making such a-request to the Board.
ASLBP No. 90-602-01-OLA-5 l
9003010066 900219 PDR   ADOCK 05000250 0                   PDR bb
Facility Operating
)
Licenses Nos. DPR-31, DPR-41)
February 19, 1990
)
i MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION On February 8,
1990 Petitioners Thomas J. Saporito, Jr.,
and the Nuclear Energy Accountability Project requested an
[
l extension of time within which to file an amended petition and l
contentions.
The requested extension was from February 20, 1990 i'
I to March 20, 1990.
On February 17,
: 1990, Petitioners received the Board's MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Petitioners an extension of time l
l but-only until March 1, 1990.
I, i
l Petitioners relying solely on the NRC rules of practice and p
lacking experience in these administrative proceedings, were not cognizant that they should have contacted the Applicant, (as i
noted at page 2 in the Board's ruling of Febr'ary 15, 1990), to u
1 discuss an extension of time prior to making such a-request to the Board.
9003010066 900219 PDR ADOCK 05000250 0
PDR bb


o O
o O
I Nevertheless,       Petitioners     did contact the Applicant, (as the   Board   suggested     in their February 15, 1990 ruling at page 2),   in   a   good   faith effort to secure additional time to file their   amended     petition and contentions.       Petitioners contacted Mr. John   Butler,     Esq., counsel for the Applicant, on February 19, 1990   and   requested consideration for an extension of time stating   that     an extension of time would permit Petitioners and the   Applicant     an opportunity to discuss petitioner's concerns.
I Nevertheless, Petitioners did contact the Applicant, (as the Board suggested in their February 15, 1990 ruling at page 2),
The   Applicant     was   not   receptive   to any further extension of time.
in a
In any event, Petitioners would address here that they have been working with the NRC and staff of the Florida International University       to   obtain   relevant   information   germane to the amendments     in   question.     Petitioners   have only recently been able   to   obtain   the   documents   which they had sought for some time. Nevertheless,       Petitioners   will comply with the Board.'s ruling   and   submit   their   filings   by March 1, 1990, however, Petitioners     note   here   that   because of these stringent filing time requirements, Petitioners will not be able to meet with the l
good faith effort to secure additional time to file their amended petition and contentions.
l Applicant     to   amicably   discuss their concerns related to these proceedings as the thrust of Petitioners motion for an extension of time indicated such a need.
Petitioners contacted Mr.
Finally,     Petitioners- request a clarification of the March 22,   1990   prehearing     conference.. Specifically,   Petitioners desire   to   know   what   is   expected   of them at this conference concerning these proceedings.
John
O                                                                                                                   I
: Butler, Esq., counsel for the Applicant, on February 19, 1990 and requested consideration for an extension of time stating that an extension of time would permit Petitioners and the Applicant an opportunity to discuss petitioner's concerns.
    * . .                                                                                                                  1
The Applicant was not receptive to any further extension of time.
  't                                                                                                                       !
In any event, Petitioners would address here that they have been working with the NRC and staff of the Florida International University to obtain relevant information germane to the amendments in question.
l Petitioners                   extend     their     thanks       and appreciation to the                 j Board     on   partially               granting       their motion for an extension of                       I 1
Petitioners have only recently been able to obtain the documents which they had sought for some time.
time   as     this action                 will     provide   for public safety and the protection of the environment as a whole.                                                                       j l
Nevertheless, Petitioners will comply with the Board.'s ruling and submit their filings by March 1, 1990, however, Petitioners note here that because of these stringent filing time requirements, Petitioners will not be able to meet with the l
l Applicant to amicably discuss their concerns related to these proceedings as the thrust of Petitioners motion for an extension of time indicated such a need.
: Finally, Petitioners-request a clarification of the March 22, 1990 prehearing conference..
Specifically, Petitioners desire to know what is expected of them at this conference concerning these proceedings.
O I
1
't l
Petitioners extend their thanks and appreciation to the j
Board on partially granting their motion for an extension of I
1 time as this action will provide for public safety and the protection of the environment as a whole.
j l
Respectfully submitted, L
Respectfully submitted, L
                                                                      ...._A .
...._A
                                                                                            ^":
^":
Thomas J. Saporito, Jrr~e           '            cN Executive Director, NE                           E g, 1202 Sioux Street                           b    EM      ;
Thomas J. Saporito, Jrr~e cN Executive Director, NE E g, b
Jupiter, Florida 33458 #j)
EM E*f{
E*f{      g i
1202 Sioux Street
  ~
#j)
Et <
Jupiter, Florida 33458 i
gg CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I       hereby certify                 that copies of the foregoing MOTION FOR CLRIFICATION,       have               been     served upon the following persons by U.S. mail, first class.                                                                                          .
g
Peter B. Bloch, Chair ASLB                                   Patricia Jehle, Esq.
~
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.                               Office of the General Counsel                       !
Et gg CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I
Washington, D.C. 20555                                       U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
hereby certify that copies of the foregoing MOTION FOR CLRIFICATION, have been served upon the following persons by U.S. mail, first class.
l         George C. Anderson 7719 Ridge Drive, NE                                         Steven F. Franz, Esq.                               -
Peter B. Bloch, Chair ASLB Patricia Jehle, Esq.
I         Seattle, Washington 98115                                                                                       i Newman & Holtzinger, P.C.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
1615 L Street, NW Elizabeth 8 Johnson                                         Washington, D.C. 20036 Oak Ridge National Laboratory                                                                                   .
Office of the General Counsel Washington, D.C. 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
P.O. Box X, Building 3500                                   Atomic Safety and-Licensing                         >
l George C. Anderson 7719 Ridge Drive, NE Steven F. Franz, Esq.
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830                                   Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
I Seattle, Washington 98115 Newman & Holtzinger, P.C.
Washington, D.C. 20555 f       - n:,         ,- -
i 1615 L Street, NW Elizabeth 8 Johnson Washington, D.C. 20036 Oak Ridge National Laboratory P.O. Box X, Building 3500 Atomic Safety and-Licensing Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
ExecutiveDirq%(or,NEAF                             '
Washington, D.C. 20555 f
                  . . .    .    - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _            _-}}
- n:,
ExecutiveDirq%(or,NEAF
-}}

Latest revision as of 04:10, 21 December 2024

Motion for Clarification.* Requests Clarification on 900222 Prehearing Conference Specifically,What Is Expected of Petitioners in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20011F086
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  
Issue date: 02/19/1990
From: Saporito T
NUCLEAR ENERGY ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#190-9964 90-602-01-OLA-5, 90-602-1-OLA-5, OLA-5, NUDOCS 9003010066
Download: ML20011F086 (3)
v • d • e


Text

-

t

_y i

)khc UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD 90 R3 26 A11:34 !

Before Administrative Judges Peter B. Bloch, Chair

{.Sck.ddg!.f[hy/d

{

A Dr. George C. Anderson imANc4 j

Elizabeth B. Johnson e

i I

In the Matter of

)

Docket Nos. 50-250-OLA-5

)

50-251-OLA-5 FLORIDA POWER & LICHT

)

COMPANY

)

Technical Specifications Turkey Point Plant

)

Replacement (Unit Nos. 3 and 4)

)

4

)

ASLBP No. 90-602-01-OLA-5 l

Facility Operating

)

Licenses Nos. DPR-31, DPR-41)

February 19, 1990

)

i MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION On February 8,

1990 Petitioners Thomas J. Saporito, Jr.,

and the Nuclear Energy Accountability Project requested an

[

l extension of time within which to file an amended petition and l

contentions.

The requested extension was from February 20, 1990 i'

I to March 20, 1990.

On February 17,

1990, Petitioners received the Board's MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Petitioners an extension of time l

l but-only until March 1, 1990.

I, i

l Petitioners relying solely on the NRC rules of practice and p

lacking experience in these administrative proceedings, were not cognizant that they should have contacted the Applicant, (as i

noted at page 2 in the Board's ruling of Febr'ary 15, 1990), to u

1 discuss an extension of time prior to making such a-request to the Board.

9003010066 900219 PDR ADOCK 05000250 0

PDR bb

o O

I Nevertheless, Petitioners did contact the Applicant, (as the Board suggested in their February 15, 1990 ruling at page 2),

in a

good faith effort to secure additional time to file their amended petition and contentions.

Petitioners contacted Mr.

John

Butler, Esq., counsel for the Applicant, on February 19, 1990 and requested consideration for an extension of time stating that an extension of time would permit Petitioners and the Applicant an opportunity to discuss petitioner's concerns.

The Applicant was not receptive to any further extension of time.

In any event, Petitioners would address here that they have been working with the NRC and staff of the Florida International University to obtain relevant information germane to the amendments in question.

Petitioners have only recently been able to obtain the documents which they had sought for some time.

Nevertheless, Petitioners will comply with the Board.'s ruling and submit their filings by March 1, 1990, however, Petitioners note here that because of these stringent filing time requirements, Petitioners will not be able to meet with the l

l Applicant to amicably discuss their concerns related to these proceedings as the thrust of Petitioners motion for an extension of time indicated such a need.

Finally, Petitioners-request a clarification of the March 22, 1990 prehearing conference..

Specifically, Petitioners desire to know what is expected of them at this conference concerning these proceedings.

O I

1

't l

Petitioners extend their thanks and appreciation to the j

Board on partially granting their motion for an extension of I

1 time as this action will provide for public safety and the protection of the environment as a whole.

j l

Respectfully submitted, L

...._A

^":

Thomas J. Saporito, Jrr~e cN Executive Director, NE E g, b

EM E*f{

1202 Sioux Street

  1. j)

Jupiter, Florida 33458 i

g

~

Et gg CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I

hereby certify that copies of the foregoing MOTION FOR CLRIFICATION, have been served upon the following persons by U.S. mail, first class.

Peter B. Bloch, Chair ASLB Patricia Jehle, Esq.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

Office of the General Counsel Washington, D.C. 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

l George C. Anderson 7719 Ridge Drive, NE Steven F. Franz, Esq.

I Seattle, Washington 98115 Newman & Holtzinger, P.C.

i 1615 L Street, NW Elizabeth 8 Johnson Washington, D.C. 20036 Oak Ridge National Laboratory P.O. Box X, Building 3500 Atomic Safety and-Licensing Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

Washington, D.C. 20555 f

- n:,

ExecutiveDirq%(or,NEAF

-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20011F086&oldid=4639008"