ML20059A381

Forwards Insp Rept 50-483/93-12 on 930801-0918 & Nov. Expresses Concern That Violation Inconsistent W/Past Excellent Performance by Licensed Operations Staff Members

ML20059A381
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	10/15/1993
From:	Greger L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Schnell D UNION ELECTRIC CO.
Shared Package
ML20059A385	List: ML20059A381 ML20059A392 ML20059A396
References
NUDOCS 9310260317
Download: ML20059A381 (2)

See also: IR 05000483/1993012

Text

.

.-

_

. - _ . _ . . _

- _ _ _ - _ _ ,

.

..

,

.

i

!

00T 151993

Docket No. 50-483

,

Union Electric Company

ATTN: Mr. Donald F. Schnell

i

Senior Vice President - Nuclear

Post Office Box 149 - Mail Code 400

St. Louis, M0 63166

Dear Mr. Schnell:

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. B. L. Bartlett,

j

Ms. D. R. Calhoun, and Mr. G. F. O'Dwyer of this office from August' I through

September 18, 1993, of activities at Callaway Plant, Unit 1, authorized by

NRC Operating License NPF-30, and to the discussion of our findings with

Mr. J. D. Blosser and others of your staff at the conclusion of the

j

inspection.

.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection.

Within these areas, the inspection consisted.of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

interviews with personnel.

'

Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities-appear to

be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of

Violation (Notice).

One violation, cited with four examples, involved the

failure to properly follow plant procedures.

Although the individual examples

in the cited violation had minimal safety significance, this. violation is of

,

concern.because it is inconsistent with the past excellent performance by your-

licensed operations staff members.

As such, it warrants your attention for

proper identification of root cause and effective implementation of corrective

actions. Two other violations were also identified, but were not' cited

because the criteria identified in 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C,-Section VII.B

}ODIl

'

were satisfied.

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions

specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response, you should

document the specific actions taken and any additional actions you plan to:

prevent recurrence.

After reviewing your response to the Notice, including

your proposed corrective actions and the results of future inspections, the

NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action-is necessary to

ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements

.

9310260317 931015-

PDR

ADOCK 050004B3

0

PDR

-

.

.

,

-

-

.

.

.-

- . . .-.

.

.-

.

!

OCT 151993

l

~

Union _ Electric Company

2

,

!

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of .

this letter, the enclosures, and your responses to this letter will be placed

i

in the NRC Public Document Room.

-l

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

I

acn- o e a :nur by L.n. c~

f

-

L4 Robert Greger, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 3

,

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

,

2.

Inspection Report No. 50-483/93012(DRP)

{'

3.

Temporary Instruction 2500/028

cc w/ enclosure:

G. L. Randolph, Vice President,

Nuclear Operations

J. V. Laux, Manager,

Quality Assurance

l

S. E. Sampson, Supervising

Engineer, Site Licensing

OC/LFDCB

Resident Inspector, RIII

i

Region IV

,

Resident Inspector, Wolf Creek

K. Drey

C. Jchn Renken, Engineer

Policy & Federal Dept.

Gerald Charnoff, Esq.

>

R. A. Ysucera, Deputy Director

Department of Natural Resources

Chairman, Illinois Commerce

i

Commission

bec:

PUBLIC

4

'

%

~

ti)l

8111

RIII

' . &

uo

-

,

h.

Oaltaku

a

reger

v a

r

as

+

,

-

.

.

-

-

.

.

..