ML20081B972: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
{{#Wiki_filter:.
Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20545 Docket No. 50-537 HQ:S:83:265 007 2 4 1983 Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Director CRBR Program Office Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20545 Docket No. 50-537 HQ:S:83:265 007 2 4 1983 Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Director CRBR Program Office Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555


==Dear Dr. Grace:==
==Dear Dr. Grace:==
MEETING  
MEETING  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
FOR THE CLINCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR PLANT PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT (PRA) PROGRAM On October 4,1983, Project Office (P0) representatives met with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to review the management of the PRA program. During the course of the meeting the following agreements were reached.
FOR THE CLINCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR PLANT PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT (PRA) PROGRAM On October 4,1983, Project Office (P0) representatives met with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to review the management of the PRA program.
(1) The P0 will formally submit the PRA subtask reports for NRC review. The subject reports will have had a project-wide review with resolution / incorporation of all project comments prior to submittal to NRC.
During the course of the meeting the following agreements were reached.
(2) The NRC will review the subject reports and provide the project with comments on the effectiveness of communications exhibited by the reports.
(1) The P0 will formally submit the PRA subtask reports for NRC review.
Enclosure 1 is a copy of the viewgraphs provided during the meeting. A PRA Review Distribution list is provided (enclosure 2) as suggested by NRC.
The subject reports will have had a project-wide review with resolution / incorporation of all project comments prior to submittal to NRC.
(2) The NRC will review the subject reports and provide the project with comments on the effectiveness of communications exhibited by the reports. is a copy of the viewgraphs provided during the meeting. A PRA Review Distribution list is provided (enclosure 2) as suggested by NRC.
The list of meeting attendees is also provided as enclosure 3.
The list of meeting attendees is also provided as enclosure 3.
If there are any questions, please call P. J. Gross of the Project Office (FTS 626-6005).
If there are any questions, please call P. J. Gross of the Project Office (FTS 626-6005).
Sincerely, hp                   -
Sincerely, hp Francis X. G f an
Francis X. G       f an Director,       f e of reeder Demonstra on Projects Office of Nuclear Energy 3 Enclosures cc: Service List                                                 00k Standard Distribution                                   M Licensing Distribution Ig B310310059 831024 PDR ADOCK 05000537 A                   PDR
: Director, f e of reeder Demonstra on Projects Office of Nuclear Energy 3 Enclosures 0k cc: Service List 0
Standard Distribution M Ig Licensing Distribution B310310059 831024 PDR ADOCK 05000537 A
PDR


1 1
i c\\
i c\
ENCLOSURE I Viewgraphs f rom the PRA Management Meeting on October 4,1983 i
l ENCLOSURE I Viewgraphs f rom the PRA Management Meeting on October 4,1983 i
L
L


1                                                                                         .
1 l
l                    CLINCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR PLANT PROJECT                                           .
CLINCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR PLANT PROJECT BRIEFING TO:
!                    BRIEFING TO:
i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
i i          NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
! ON:
          !         ON:
I l PRA STATUS PRESENTED BY:
I l         PRA STATUS PRESENTED BY:       .
i P.J. GROSS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, l
;          i         P.J. GROSS
I PUBLIC SAFETY I
!          !          ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, l           I         PUBLIC SAFETY                                                     !
CRBRP PROJECT OFFICE OAK RIDGE, TN.
I CRBRP PROJECT OFFICE OAK RIDGE, TN.                               Q, J'                Wba OCTOBER 4,1983            Trn u ,.m,L L
Q, L
l
Trn u,.m, J' W b a L
\   .              .
- OCTOBER 4,1983 l
\\


AGENDA
AGENDA PROGRAM GOALS RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTICIPANTS I
* PROGRAM GOALS                                   '
RELIABILITY OF PRODUCTS REVIEW CYCLE AND SCHEDULE i
I
i i
* RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTICIPANTS
\\
!
l i'
* RELIABILITY OF PRODUCTS i
I i
i
~
* REVIEW CYCLE AND SCHEDULE i
\                                                             .
l i'         I i
        ~
l
l
.l
.l
}
}


:                                  GOALS OF PRA PROGRAM .
GOALS OF PRA PROGRAM ENHANCE SAFE DESIGN AND OPERATION OF THE PLANT IMPROVE UNDERSTANDING OF PLANT BEHAVIOR l
* ENHANCE SAFE DESIGN AND OPERATION OF THE                         ;
UNDER DEGRADED CONDITIONS i.
PLANT
IMPROVE OPERATOR'S ABILITY TO MANAGE I
* IMPROVE UNDERSTANDING OF PLANT BEHAVIOR                   .
ACCIDENTS ASSESS SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF DESIGN ALTERNATIVES ENHANCE EMERGENCY PLANNING EFFECTIVENESS I
l UNDER DEGRADED CONDITIONS                                 i.
* ASSIST IN PREPARATION OF LCOs, TEST I
* IMPROVE OPERATOR'S ABILITY TO MANAGE                     I ACCIDENTS
INTERVALS, AND TECH SPECS CHECK DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT SELECTION l
* ASSESS SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF DESIGN ALTERNATIVES
CHARACTERIZE RELATIVE RISK i
* ENHANCE EMERGENCY PLANNING EFFECTIVENESS                         :
f
I
'N
* ASSIST IN PREPARATION OF LCOs, TEST                       I INTERVALS, AND TECH SPECS                                         .
~
l    -
* CHECK DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT SELECTION
* CHARACTERIZE RELATIVE RISK                                 '
i                                                                      ;
        'N f          -
  '          ~


PROJECT OFFICE ORGANIZATIONAL CHART P. BREWINGTON PROJECT l                                             DIRECTOR I                 I                 I                       I         l     l l   1
PROJECT OFFICE ORGANIZATIONAL CHART P. BREWINGTON PROJECT l
!l
DIRECTOR I
    !          C. FOX ENGINEERING P. GROSS PUBLIC SAFETY D. KEETON OPERATIONS OTHER DIVISIONS DIVISION           DIVISION             DIVISION               '
I I
!                          I -
I l
1 l                                                                           ?
l l
!                        RISK l                   MANAGEMENT               OTHERS                       j i                       BRANCH                                             -
1
l   !
!l C. FOX P. GROSS D. KEETON OTHER ENGINEERING PUBLIC SAFETY OPERATIONS DIVISIONS DIVISION DIVISION DIVISION I
j .l                                                                         t
1 l
                                                                            /
?
RISK l
MANAGEMENT OTHERS j
i BRANCH l
j
.l t
/
7
7


i PRA PROGRAMMATIC RESPONSIBILITIES i
PRA PROGRAMMATIC RESPONSIBILITIES i
!        TECHNICAL                                                                     '
i i
REVIEW   * - - - -
TECHNICAL REVIEW P. GROSS NRC i
* P. GROSS     *---*            NRC i       COMMITTEE                                                                 ;
COMMITTEE I
    .                                        I                                   !
I t
I                                                                                 !
I RISK MANAGEMENT l
t   '.                                                                          ,
BRANCH 4
I                                 RISK MANAGEMENT                                 !
I I
l                                        BRANCH                                 ,
i ENGINEERING OPERATIONS i
4 I                                                     I i
CONTRACTOR DIVISION DIVISION (TEC)
ENGINEERING               OPERATIONS i   :
I I
CONTRACTOR                                             DIVISION DIVISION (TEC)
]
I I             ]
E BR TVA 1
    .                          . E             BR               TVA i
i I
1 I
O
O


l TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMil I EE (TRC'             .
l TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMil I EE (TRC' i
i
PROVIDES PROGRAMMATIC RECOMMENDATIONS REVIEWS METHODOLOGY AND BASIC TECHNICAL l
* PROVIDES PROGRAMMATIC RECOMMENDATIONS l
APPROACH i
* REVIEWS METHODOLOGY AND BASIC TECHNICAL i
(
APPROACH                                   ;
l REVIEWS OVERALL MODEL AND SPECIFIC l
(         l
PRODUCTS REVIEWS EFFECTIVENESS OF TECHNOLOGY i
* REVIEWS OVERALL MODEL AND SPECIFIC         l PRODUCTS i
TRANSFER l
* REVIEWS EFFECTIVENESS OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER l
i REVIEWS EFFECTIVENESS OF FEEDBACK l
TO DESIGN I.
i
i
* REVIEWS EFFECTIVENESS OF FEEDBACK l              TO DESIGN I.
~
!        i
I i
  ~
I
!                                                        i
                  ~
i
i
~


l                                             1
l 1
!      TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMil IEE COMPOSED OF
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMil IEE COMPOSED OF PROJECT OFFICE PERSONNEL (PUBLIC i
* PROJECT OFFICE PERSONNEL (PUBLIC       i l-       SAFETY, ENGINEERING)
l-SAFETY, ENGINEERING)
* DESIGN ORGANIZATIONS
DESIGN ORGANIZATIONS
[         INDEPENDENT PRA CONSULTANTS
[
:
INDEPENDENT PRA CONSULTANTS
* TVA PERSONNEL i
* TVA PERSONNEL l
l I
i I
i i
i i
i i
i    i                                    -
L 4
L 4
:                                            /
/


FLOW CHART FOR FEEDBACK TO DESIGN
FLOW CHART FOR FEEDBACK TO DESIGN PUBLIC RECOM. -
                  ,    PUBLIC     RECOM. -   EN/OP TEC MADE       SAFETY     TRANSMI
EN/OP TEC MADE SAFETY TRANSMI n
    ,      n                  a n                                         .
a n y
    .                                                y j                                     NO         NG   YES           .
j NO NG YES 1
1                                          EQUIRED u                                                   ,
EQUIRED u
FILE RESOLUTION                                     u T         'N
FILE RESOLUTION u
      .        RECOMMEND.                               ORG     OR FORMAL ECP FINAL                     PROCESS DISPOSITION                                 I OF RECOMMENDATION P
T
YES           ,g NO    i CCEPT 1
'N RECOMMEND.
ORG OR FORMAL ECP FINAL PROCESS DISPOSITION I
OF RECOMMENDATION P
YES NO i
,g CCEPT 1


RELIABILITY ASSURED BY INTERNAL TEC REVIEW CY.CLE AND QA PROGRAM PROJECT REVIEW CYCLE             !
RELIABILITY ASSURED BY INTERNAL TEC REVIEW CY.CLE AND QA PROGRAM PROJECT REVIEW CYCLE (PO, DESIGNERS) l
(PO, DESIGNERS) l TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE '
* TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SCRUTINY i
i
PRA/SIA REVIEW AND EXCHANGE NRC REVIEW CYCLE i
              . SCRUTINY PRA/SIA REVIEW AND EXCHANGE i
l
* NRC REVIEW CYCLE
                                        .      l


i
i
                                                                          \
\\
    .                OVERVIEW OF TEC REVIEW CYCLE DRAF CHANGES I                        I        i                      M
OVERVIEW OF TEC REVIEW CYCLE DRAF i CHANGES M < INA""3
            <ANALYSISJ a
<ANALYSISJ
                              ""3                 u J M < INA""3            :
"" ""3 I
u
M I
        ,        TASK       TASK         QA               REVIEW j MGMNT.         MANAGER     REVIEW         I COMMENT i OVERVIEW   REVIEW                           PONSE/
< J a
LINE MANAGER REVIEW
u u
        .                                                            u
TASK TASK QA REVIEW j
        .              p _ _v _ _ j
MGMNT.
        !                                                          TASK lEXTE8NALl                              MANAGER 1
MANAGER REVIEW I COMMENT i
REVIEW   l
OVERVIEW REVIEW PONSE/
:                                                          REVIEW L _ __ _ _ J
LINE MANAGER REVIEW u
                                                                          )
p _ _v _ _ j lEXTE8NALl TASK MANAGER 1
REVIEW l
REVIEW L _ __ _ _ J
)


l-                                                   TEC QA ACTIVITIES l!.
l-TEC QA ACTIVITIES l
ANALYSIS                         OVERSIGHT       DOCUMENTATION     ,
ANALYSIS OVERSIGHT DOCUMENTATION i
i
!
* TASK LEADER
* TASK LEADER
* TEC ADVISOR
* TEC ADVISOR FILE I
* FILE I                       REVIEW                           GROUP             MAINTENANCE AUDIT L                                                                                             '
REVIEW GROUP MAINTENANCE AUDIT L
j
DOCUMENTATION j
* QA TEST CASE
* QA TEST CASE
* R&D ACTIVITY
* R&D ACTIVITY i
* DOCUMENTATION i                      AND PRODUCT                     MONITOR           CONTROL
AND PRODUCT MONITOR CONTROL REVIEW SYSTEM i
!                      REVIEW                                             SYSTEM i           i i           i                                                     u
i u
!,          i                                                 FINDINGS i
i i
i                                                     u i                                            MONTHLY QA i
i FINDINGS i
REPORT                           t
i u
                                                                                            )
MONTHLY QA i
i REPORT t
)
1 l
1 l


I L.                     PROJECT REVIEW OF PRA PRODUCTS i
I L.
l t
PROJECT REVIEW OF PRA PRODUCTS i
(ISSUE TEC DRAFT)
l (ISSUE t
: j.                    .
TEC DRAFT) u t
t                       u                    t          !
j.
i i                          B&R                         PO .
t i
W
i B&R PO W
: l.               ,
l.
b ,'             ;                                      t I                                             RESOLVE COMMENTS WITH TEC j                                 .                  t (I
b,'
t I
RESOLVE COMMENTS WITH TEC j
t (I
TEC FINAL)
TEC FINAL)
                -l               t                       u                     t
-l t
    .-            i B&R           =         PO     :            W
u t
    '-            i.
i i.
I                             I a
B&R
                  !      .t     .
=
                    .          NRC                       y
PO W
                        ~
I I
I    ^S j          .      !                          RESOLVE COMMENTS       ,  .,hUjEC O
a
WITH TEC     -
.t NRC y
DOCUMENT" I
.,hUjEC I
^S
~
RESOLVE COMMENTS j
O WITH TEC DOCUMENT" I
1
1


j-PROJECT REVIEW CYCLE BEGINNING OF TASK-REVIEW PLANS AND               .
PROJECT REVIEW CYCLE j-BEGINNING OF TASK-REVIEW PLANS AND APPROACHES e
i APPROACHES                                      e I                       ASSURES AGREEMENT ON APPROACH AT FRONT       l j         -
i I
END
ASSURES AGREEMENT ON APPROACH AT FRONT l
[             HELPS IDENTIFY INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
j END
        ~!
[
* i                    REVIEW TEC DESIGN UNDERSTANDING BEFORE I         ANALYSIS
HELPS IDENTIFY INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
.        i p                       ASSURES CORRECT UNDERSTANDING l         j             ASSURES CORRECT ASSUMPTIONS l         .
~ !
MINIMlZES REWORK REVIEW OF DRAFT PRODUCT i
REVIEW TEC DESIGN UNDERSTANDING BEFORE i
    ~
I ANALYSIS i
APPROPRIATE DESIGN ORGANIZATIONS i
p ASSURES CORRECT UNDERSTANDING l
ASSURES TECHNICAL ACCURACY i-         ,
j ASSURES CORRECT ASSUMPTIONS l
                                                                    .l
MINIMlZES REWORK i
REVIEW OF DRAFT PRODUCT APPROPRIATE DESIGN ORGANIZATIONS
~
i ASSURES TECHNICAL ACCURACY i-
.l


1984                                                             1985 O]NIDlJIFIM]AIMlJIJ]A]S                                                       OINIDlJ1F]M] AIM]J
1984 1985 O]NIDlJIFIM]AIMlJIJ]A]S OINIDlJ1F]M] AIM]J
                                .CEvie.T m es                           .---o- - - e 2C PAULT TREES
.CEvie.T m es
* MOoetS                             -.-.--.e-------e
.---o- - - e 2C PAULT TREES
* OAT A                                             c.
* MOoetS
* MOOUL AMTATION                                   ;
-.-.--.e-------e
3C OUAN saf sC 4TeON
* OAT A c.
* F AULT TREd                                           ;                                                    ,
* MOOUL AMTATION 3C OUAN saf sC 4TeON
* SEOutseCE SOLUTO881                                 ---e                                                                                                                 i
* F AULT TREd
* StouthCE SOLUTIOft 2                                   -- --e
* SEOutseCE SOLUTO881
* 4C HUMAN A4LIAtellTY                                                     ;-- -% - - se.---e
---e i
* SC 3EOuf NCE litms TION & REVIEW                                         ;- _:          0 - -m---e GC CORE PHf NOMEkOLOOV e Evf NT TREE                                   e --M--se---.e
* StouthCE SOLUTIOft 2
* OUA8eIetICATr380                                     2---3         -e--         W 7C CONT A18eMe NI *tef fe04E.
-- --e 4C HUMAN A4LIAtellTY
;-- -% - - se.---e SC 3EOuf NCE litms TION & REVIEW 0 - -m---e GC CORE PHf NOMEkOLOOV e Evf NT TREE e --M--se---.e
* OUA8eIetICATr380 2---3
-e-- W 7C CONT A18eMe NI *tef fe04E.
l
l
* EVtNT TRf E                                               - - -W. ---le---e
* EVtNT TRf E
* OUANTNICATION                                                             ---m- -e---c - e 2A RADIO 8eUCteOE AELE ASE I
- - -W. ---le---e
* TRANSPORT ANAL 7Sl4 -                                           - - -m- -e -- -r
* OUANTNICATION
* PTLE ASE CAf tGO#eES                                                     ---m- e---:               O me 3A HE ALTH COseSEOutNCES
---m- -e---c - e 2A RADIO 8eUCteOE AELE ASE I
;
* TRANSPORT ANAL 7Sl4 -
* MODELS & DAT A                                                                   2 - .e- -G- - -A.--e                                                           .
- - -m- -e -- -r
* COceDtTIONAL AtSE CURVSS                                                                       _ - -w.--o- - -#--e 4A 8btSR ANALYSIS                                                                                               : - .e- =e- - -#---e
* PTLE ASE CAf tGO#eES
.                              S A MOOf L UPO AT E I                                                                                                                                                                               - -@. - --e e     SA E3R Cone SOURCES
---m-e---:
* SEOutNCE ANAiVSIS                                                                       : --% -.u-             e I                        I e CONSEQUENCE A8eALYS48
O me 3A HE ALTH COseSEOutNCES
* 2 - -m- - -- e i                       i     TA UpeCERTAaleTT
* MODELS & DAT A 2 -.e- -G- - -A.--e
                                                                                                                                                    -r     0 - .e-.--g j                             SA 1 FIAE l
* COceDtTIONAL AtSE CURVSS
* LIQUIO METAL                                                 -- .          O -W 3
_ - -w.--o- - -#--e 4A 8btSR ANALYSIS
* CONVENilOfeAL                                               -    3-     e- - -n.-.-e SA 2 INvtRO8eNIENTAL (TEEEPERAT.AK)                                                                   - --m- - e--.-e
: -.e- =e- - -#---e S A MOOf L UPO AT E I
:                              84 3 MtSSItf S                                                                                 -- -se-- e-- -e.g I
- -@. - --e e
S A 4 IW *T RN AL f L 0004800                                             - - -          ; - .e- -e g     SA S OthtR IfetERNAL CCF A                                                                           :    :    0 -M 1                         ;    BA 8 '3EISM*C
SA E3R Cone SOURCES
* F R AGitiiy i                         g
* SEOutNCE ANAiVSIS I
I
: --% -.u-e e CONSEQUENCE A8eALYS48
* 2 - -m- - -- e i
i TA UpeCERTAaleTT
-r 0 -.e-.--g j
SA 1 FIAE l
* LIQUIO METAL O -W 3
* CONVENilOfeAL 3-e- - -n.-.-e SA 2 INvtRO8eNIENTAL (TEEEPERAT.AK)
- --m- - e--.-e 84 3 MtSSItf S
-- -se-- e-- -e.g I
S A 4 IW *T RN AL f L 0004800
; -.e- -e g
SA S OthtR IfetERNAL CCF A 0 -M 1
BA 8 '3EISM*C
* F R AGitiiy i
g
:---m --e--.e e
* SitSainCITY
* SitSainCITY
:---m --e--.e              e
;- - - m
                                                                                                ;- - - m        e. . .e-.--e j
: e...e-.--e j
* MOOGLS                                                                                 ;--          0 -.e-.- e
* MOOGLS 0 -.e-.- e
;
* RE SUL T S
* RE SUL T S j                               SA T WE ATHER
__4-~
__4-~        0 -M j                         {
0 -M j
{
SA T WE ATHER
--W - --We j
84 S StiE SPECNIC
84 S StiE SPECNIC
                                                                                                                      --W - --We
:- - % 4 - -p--J l
* i                                                                                            :- - % 4 - -p--J                                                                       l e
i e
SA StA ist TE Rt ACE                               .e. .% --e                   g g    10A DOCUMtNT ATIOfe' 18 OrtRA704 ACTIOas ANALTSd                                                             --
SA StA ist TE Rt ACE
0 -.g     e 28 EMERGINCY PLAN IIePUT                                                                                                                       - - .3-=--@. - - p---e JB 18ePUT TO LCDs                                                                                                                   - w,.. .s_         -g 48 ACClotMT Detteet ATIN                                                                                                             - .m t
.e..% --e g
SR nlSEL MANAGEMtNT PL AN e-- w 1   %- .e - e l
10A DOCUMtNT ATIOfe' g
                                *DOLUMENT AtaON IS INDeCATED Si a j                                 MattSIOpet FOR 4 ACH INoeV. RISR [
18 OrtRA704 ACTIOas ANALTSd 0
j       .                  t   4 af wie w Dn Af t Pnovenf D to t nepF PO w S&M         A IIc efelf f" eat IIIstitiofeE teeOf f U8stESS IfeOICAllD       ~ if C DtyttoriseO Oct nivtSINO PRODUCis i
-.g e
9 e weAt omar i Pnoviot D 1O onenP PC W. 344. feltC           esattamat asettsloset 85 AS$uutD Osse WEER PRooft           * ** lac AWAllIIeQ ftEWIEW COMutNIS l                       6     e sweat pnoACI DOCueelmt ISSUED                               to f Atle E nitesseAt InstEstoset TO AttOW FOft           .
28 EMERGINCY PLAN IIePUT
  ,                            M COnceed 4iS At tummtD fO fIC                               IpeTE Rf4AL_ RE vie w I f
- -.3-=--@. - - p---e JB 18ePUT TO LCDs
'1
- w,...s_
                                                                                                                                                                                                            )
-g t
I m
48 ACClotMT Detteet ATIN
-.m e-- w SR nlSEL MANAGEMtNT PL AN 1
%-.e - e l
*DOLUMENT AtaON IS INDeCATED Si a j
MattSIOpet FOR 4 ACH INoeV. RISR [
j t
4 af wie w Dn Af t Pnovenf D to t nepF PO w S&M A IIc efelf f" eat IIIstitiofeE teeOf f U8stESS IfeOICAllD
~ if C DtyttoriseO Oct nivtSINO PRODUCis i
9 e weAt omar i Pnoviot D 1O onenP PC W. 344. feltC esattamat asettsloset 85 AS$uutD Osse WEER PRooft
* ** lac AWAllIIeQ ftEWIEW COMutNIS l
6 e sweat pnoACI DOCueelmt ISSUED to f Atle E nitesseAt InstEstoset TO AttOW FOft M COnceed 4iS At tummtD fO fIC IpeTE Rf4AL_ RE vie w I f
)
'1 I
m


l-
l-SUGGESTED NRC MEETING DATES EARLY NOVEMBER,1983
    -          SUGGESTED NRC MEETING DATES
* MID JANUARY,1984
* EARLY NOVEMBER,1983 ,
* EARLY APRIL,1984 i
* MID JANUARY,1984       .
I
i I
* EARLY APRIL,1984
* MID JULY,1984
* MID JULY,1984
)
)
i
* EARLY OCTOBER,1984 i
* EARLY OCTOBER,1984 L
L
* EARLY JANUARY,1985
* EARLY JANUARY,1985
              !
* EARLY APRIL,1985 l
* EARLY APRIL,1985 l
* EARLY JULY,1985 l,
* EARLY JULY,1985 l
I i           i
I i
!            i l         .                                                            l 9
i i
l l
9


                                  ... .  .    ..v . . . . . . ..
..v
          ~
~
ENCLOSURE II PRA REVIEW DISTRIBUTION LIST Dr. J. Nelson Grace, NRC (6)
ENCLOSURE II PRA REVIEW DISTRIBUTION LIST Dr. J.
Nelson Grace, NRC (6)
A. Spano, NRC (1)
A. Spano, NRC (1)
P. Boehnert, ACRS (1)
P. Boehnert, ACRS (1)
E. Rumble, SAI (2)
E.
Rumble, SAI (2)
R. Liner, SAI (1) i I
R. Liner, SAI (1) i I
L
L


                . . _ . . . = - - - - -   .      .
.. _... = - - - - -
ENCLOSURE III                 j l
ENCLOSURE III j
l MEETING ATTENDEES                 j PRA MANAGEMENT MEETING October 4, 1983 S. Asselin                                     TEC P. Gross                                         CRB RP-PO F. Gavigan                                       DOE, HQ R. Emmett                                       CRB RP-PO A. Spano                                       NRC-RRAB T. King                                           NRC-CRBRPO J. Swift                                           NRC-CRBRPO N. Grace                                           NRC-CRBRPO R. Sta rk                                         NRC-CRBRPO R. Rothman                                         NRC GSB L. Reiter                                           NRC GSB     l L. N. Ribb                                         LNR Assoc. I H. Holz                                             NRC-CRBRPO S. Additon                                       W-Bethesda G. Sherwood                                         DOE, HQ P. Boehne rt                                       ACRS Staff 1}}
MEETING ATTENDEES j
PRA MANAGEMENT MEETING October 4, 1983 S. Asselin TEC P. Gross CRB RP-PO F. Gavigan DOE, HQ R.
Emmett CRB RP-PO A.
Spano NRC-RRAB T.
King NRC-CRBRPO J. Swift NRC-CRBRPO N. Grace NRC-CRBRPO R. Sta rk NRC-CRBRPO R.
Rothman NRC GSB L. Reiter NRC GSB L. N. Ribb LNR Assoc.
H. Holz NRC-CRBRPO S. Additon W-Bethesda G.
Sherwood DOE, HQ P.
Boehne rt ACRS Staff}}

Latest revision as of 08:18, 14 December 2024

Summarizes 831004 Meeting W/Nrc,Acrs & Lnr Assoc Re Mgt of Crbr PRA Program.Viewgraphs & List of Meeting Attendees Encl
ML20081B972
Person / Time
Site: Clinch River
Issue date: 10/24/1983
From: Gavigan F
ENERGY, DEPT. OF, CLINCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR PLANT
To: Grace J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
HQ:S:83:265, NUDOCS 8310310059
Download: ML20081B972 (19)


Text

.

Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20545 Docket No. 50-537 HQ:S:83:265 007 2 4 1983 Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Director CRBR Program Office Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Dr. Grace:

MEETING

SUMMARY

FOR THE CLINCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR PLANT PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT (PRA) PROGRAM On October 4,1983, Project Office (P0) representatives met with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to review the management of the PRA program.

During the course of the meeting the following agreements were reached.

(1) The P0 will formally submit the PRA subtask reports for NRC review.

The subject reports will have had a project-wide review with resolution / incorporation of all project comments prior to submittal to NRC.

(2) The NRC will review the subject reports and provide the project with comments on the effectiveness of communications exhibited by the reports. is a copy of the viewgraphs provided during the meeting. A PRA Review Distribution list is provided (enclosure 2) as suggested by NRC.

The list of meeting attendees is also provided as enclosure 3.

If there are any questions, please call P. J. Gross of the Project Office (FTS 626-6005).

Sincerely, hp Francis X. G f an

Director, f e of reeder Demonstra on Projects Office of Nuclear Energy 3 Enclosures 0k cc: Service List 0

Standard Distribution M Ig Licensing Distribution B310310059 831024 PDR ADOCK 05000537 A

PDR

i c\\

ENCLOSURE I Viewgraphs f rom the PRA Management Meeting on October 4,1983 i

L

1 l

CLINCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR PLANT PROJECT BRIEFING TO:

i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i

! ON:

I l PRA STATUS PRESENTED BY:

i P.J. GROSS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, l

I PUBLIC SAFETY I

CRBRP PROJECT OFFICE OAK RIDGE, TN.

Q, L

Trn u,.m, J' W b a L

- OCTOBER 4,1983 l

\\

AGENDA PROGRAM GOALS RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTICIPANTS I

RELIABILITY OF PRODUCTS REVIEW CYCLE AND SCHEDULE i

i i

\\

l i'

I i

~

l

.l

}

GOALS OF PRA PROGRAM ENHANCE SAFE DESIGN AND OPERATION OF THE PLANT IMPROVE UNDERSTANDING OF PLANT BEHAVIOR l

UNDER DEGRADED CONDITIONS i.

IMPROVE OPERATOR'S ABILITY TO MANAGE I

ACCIDENTS ASSESS SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF DESIGN ALTERNATIVES ENHANCE EMERGENCY PLANNING EFFECTIVENESS I

  • ASSIST IN PREPARATION OF LCOs, TEST I

INTERVALS, AND TECH SPECS CHECK DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT SELECTION l

CHARACTERIZE RELATIVE RISK i

f

'N

~

PROJECT OFFICE ORGANIZATIONAL CHART P. BREWINGTON PROJECT l

DIRECTOR I

I I

I l

l l

1

!l C. FOX P. GROSS D. KEETON OTHER ENGINEERING PUBLIC SAFETY OPERATIONS DIVISIONS DIVISION DIVISION DIVISION I

1 l

?

RISK l

MANAGEMENT OTHERS j

i BRANCH l

j

.l t

/

7

PRA PROGRAMMATIC RESPONSIBILITIES i

i i

TECHNICAL REVIEW P. GROSS NRC i

COMMITTEE I

I t

I RISK MANAGEMENT l

BRANCH 4

I I

i ENGINEERING OPERATIONS i

CONTRACTOR DIVISION DIVISION (TEC)

I I

]

E BR TVA 1

i I

O

l TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMil I EE (TRC' i

PROVIDES PROGRAMMATIC RECOMMENDATIONS REVIEWS METHODOLOGY AND BASIC TECHNICAL l

APPROACH i

(

l REVIEWS OVERALL MODEL AND SPECIFIC l

PRODUCTS REVIEWS EFFECTIVENESS OF TECHNOLOGY i

TRANSFER l

i REVIEWS EFFECTIVENESS OF FEEDBACK l

TO DESIGN I.

i

~

I i

i

~

l 1

TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMil IEE COMPOSED OF PROJECT OFFICE PERSONNEL (PUBLIC i

l-SAFETY, ENGINEERING)

DESIGN ORGANIZATIONS

[

INDEPENDENT PRA CONSULTANTS

  • TVA PERSONNEL l

i I

i i

i i

L 4

/

FLOW CHART FOR FEEDBACK TO DESIGN PUBLIC RECOM. -

EN/OP TEC MADE SAFETY TRANSMI n

a n y

j NO NG YES 1

EQUIRED u

FILE RESOLUTION u

T

'N RECOMMEND.

ORG OR FORMAL ECP FINAL PROCESS DISPOSITION I

OF RECOMMENDATION P

YES NO i

,g CCEPT 1

RELIABILITY ASSURED BY INTERNAL TEC REVIEW CY.CLE AND QA PROGRAM PROJECT REVIEW CYCLE (PO, DESIGNERS) l

  • TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SCRUTINY i

PRA/SIA REVIEW AND EXCHANGE NRC REVIEW CYCLE i

l

i

\\

OVERVIEW OF TEC REVIEW CYCLE DRAF i CHANGES M < INA""3

<ANALYSISJ

"" ""3 I

M I

< J a

u u

TASK TASK QA REVIEW j

MGMNT.

MANAGER REVIEW I COMMENT i

OVERVIEW REVIEW PONSE/

LINE MANAGER REVIEW u

p _ _v _ _ j lEXTE8NALl TASK MANAGER 1

REVIEW l

REVIEW L _ __ _ _ J

)

l-TEC QA ACTIVITIES l

ANALYSIS OVERSIGHT DOCUMENTATION i

  • TASK LEADER
  • TEC ADVISOR FILE I

REVIEW GROUP MAINTENANCE AUDIT L

DOCUMENTATION j

  • QA TEST CASE
  • R&D ACTIVITY i

AND PRODUCT MONITOR CONTROL REVIEW SYSTEM i

i u

i i

i FINDINGS i

i u

MONTHLY QA i

i REPORT t

)

1 l

I L.

PROJECT REVIEW OF PRA PRODUCTS i

l (ISSUE t

TEC DRAFT) u t

j.

t i

i B&R PO W

l.

b,'

t I

RESOLVE COMMENTS WITH TEC j

t (I

TEC FINAL)

-l t

u t

i i.

B&R

=

PO W

I I

a

.t NRC y

.,hUjEC I

^S

~

RESOLVE COMMENTS j

O WITH TEC DOCUMENT" I

1

PROJECT REVIEW CYCLE j-BEGINNING OF TASK-REVIEW PLANS AND APPROACHES e

i I

ASSURES AGREEMENT ON APPROACH AT FRONT l

j END

[

HELPS IDENTIFY INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS

~ !

REVIEW TEC DESIGN UNDERSTANDING BEFORE i

I ANALYSIS i

p ASSURES CORRECT UNDERSTANDING l

j ASSURES CORRECT ASSUMPTIONS l

MINIMlZES REWORK i

REVIEW OF DRAFT PRODUCT APPROPRIATE DESIGN ORGANIZATIONS

~

i ASSURES TECHNICAL ACCURACY i-

.l

1984 1985 O]NIDlJIFIM]AIMlJIJ]A]S OINIDlJ1F]M] AIM]J

.CEvie.T m es

.---o- - - e 2C PAULT TREES

  • MOoetS

-.-.--.e-------e

  • OAT A c.
  • MOOUL AMTATION 3C OUAN saf sC 4TeON
  • F AULT TREd
  • SEOutseCE SOLUTO881

---e i

  • StouthCE SOLUTIOft 2

-- --e 4C HUMAN A4LIAtellTY

-- -% - - se.---e SC 3EOuf NCE litms TION & REVIEW 0 - -m---e GC CORE PHf NOMEkOLOOV e Evf NT TREE e --M--se---.e
  • OUA8eIetICATr380 2---3

-e-- W 7C CONT A18eMe NI *tef fe04E.

l

  • EVtNT TRf E

- - -W. ---le---e

  • OUANTNICATION

---m- -e---c - e 2A RADIO 8eUCteOE AELE ASE I

  • TRANSPORT ANAL 7Sl4 -

- - -m- -e -- -r

  • PTLE ASE CAf tGO#eES

---m-e---:

O me 3A HE ALTH COseSEOutNCES

  • MODELS & DAT A 2 -.e- -G- - -A.--e
  • COceDtTIONAL AtSE CURVSS

_ - -w.--o- - -#--e 4A 8btSR ANALYSIS

-.e- =e- - -#---e S A MOOf L UPO AT E I

- -@. - --e e

SA E3R Cone SOURCES

  • SEOutNCE ANAiVSIS I

I

--% -.u-e e CONSEQUENCE A8eALYS48
  • 2 - -m- - -- e i

i TA UpeCERTAaleTT

-r 0 -.e-.--g j

SA 1 FIAE l

  • LIQUIO METAL O -W 3
  • CONVENilOfeAL 3-e- - -n.-.-e SA 2 INvtRO8eNIENTAL (TEEEPERAT.AK)

- --m- - e--.-e 84 3 MtSSItf S

-- -se-- e-- -e.g I

S A 4 IW *T RN AL f L 0004800

-.e- -e g

SA S OthtR IfetERNAL CCF A 0 -M 1

BA 8 '3EISM*C

  • F R AGitiiy i

g

---m --e--.e e
  • SitSainCITY
- - - m
e...e-.--e j
  • MOOGLS 0 -.e-.- e
  • RE SUL T S

__4-~

0 -M j

{

SA T WE ATHER

--W - --We j

84 S StiE SPECNIC

- - % 4 - -p--J l

i e

SA StA ist TE Rt ACE

.e..% --e g

10A DOCUMtNT ATIOfe' g

18 OrtRA704 ACTIOas ANALTSd 0

-.g e

28 EMERGINCY PLAN IIePUT

- -.3-=--@. - - p---e JB 18ePUT TO LCDs

- w,...s_

-g t

48 ACClotMT Detteet ATIN

-.m e-- w SR nlSEL MANAGEMtNT PL AN 1

%-.e - e l

  • DOLUMENT AtaON IS INDeCATED Si a j

MattSIOpet FOR 4 ACH INoeV. RISR [

j t

4 af wie w Dn Af t Pnovenf D to t nepF PO w S&M A IIc efelf f" eat IIIstitiofeE teeOf f U8stESS IfeOICAllD

~ if C DtyttoriseO Oct nivtSINO PRODUCis i

9 e weAt omar i Pnoviot D 1O onenP PC W. 344. feltC esattamat asettsloset 85 AS$uutD Osse WEER PRooft

  • ** lac AWAllIIeQ ftEWIEW COMutNIS l

6 e sweat pnoACI DOCueelmt ISSUED to f Atle E nitesseAt InstEstoset TO AttOW FOft M COnceed 4iS At tummtD fO fIC IpeTE Rf4AL_ RE vie w I f

)

'1 I

m

l-SUGGESTED NRC MEETING DATES EARLY NOVEMBER,1983

  • MID JANUARY,1984
  • EARLY APRIL,1984 i

I

)

  • EARLY OCTOBER,1984 i

L

  • EARLY JANUARY,1985
  • EARLY APRIL,1985 l
  • EARLY JULY,1985 l

I i

i i

l l

9

..v

~

ENCLOSURE II PRA REVIEW DISTRIBUTION LIST Dr. J.

Nelson Grace, NRC (6)

A. Spano, NRC (1)

P. Boehnert, ACRS (1)

E.

Rumble, SAI (2)

R. Liner, SAI (1) i I

L

.. _... = - - - - -

ENCLOSURE III j

MEETING ATTENDEES j

PRA MANAGEMENT MEETING October 4, 1983 S. Asselin TEC P. Gross CRB RP-PO F. Gavigan DOE, HQ R.

Emmett CRB RP-PO A.

Spano NRC-RRAB T.

King NRC-CRBRPO J. Swift NRC-CRBRPO N. Grace NRC-CRBRPO R. Sta rk NRC-CRBRPO R.

Rothman NRC GSB L. Reiter NRC GSB L. N. Ribb LNR Assoc.

H. Holz NRC-CRBRPO S. Additon W-Bethesda G.

Sherwood DOE, HQ P.

Boehne rt ACRS Staff