ML20083C761: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:
{{#Wiki_filter:"
{{#Wiki_filter:"
e
e
    $V4s 2NRC-3-101
$V4s 2NRC-3-101 (412) 787 - 5141 (412)923 - 1960 Telecopy (412) 787-2629 Nuclear Construction Division December 21, 1983 Robinson Plaza, Building 2. Suite 210 Pittsburgh, PA 15205 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION:
                            .                                                          (412) 787 - 5141 (412)923 - 1960 Telecopy (412) 787-2629 Nuclear Construction Division                                       December 21, 1983 Robinson Plaza, Building 2. Suite 210 Pittsburgh, PA 15205 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION:           Mr. George W. Knighton, Chie f Licens ing Branch 3 Of fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Mr. George W. Knighton, Chie f Licens ing Branch 3 Of fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-412 Licensing Schedule Gentlemen:
Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-412 Licensing Schedule Gentlemen:
During 'the June 7,1983, management meet ing , H. R. Denton indicated that he favored accelerating the Beaver Valley 2 (BV-2) licensing schedule.
During 'the June 7,1983, management meet ing, H. R. Denton indicated that he favored accelerating the Beaver Valley 2 (BV-2) licensing schedule.
A propos ed schedule was prov ided to Duquesne Light Company (DLC) at that meeting.           To da t e , engineering , cons truct ion, and licensing act ivities are proceeding as scheduled.
A propos ed schedule was prov ided to Duquesne Light Company (DLC) at that meeting.
On May 16,1983, DLC received a let ter indicat ing t'lat our ap plica-tion was acceptable fo r docke t ing .         This letter indicated that a single set of ques tions would be transmitted to DLC. These ques t ions , if provided in accordance with the lice ns ing sch ed ule , were to be provided by August 31, 1983.         In actuality, DLC has received this set of ques t ions in several part s ranging from August 31, 1983, to November 18, 1983, with over half of these questions having been transmitted on September 19, 1983, or later.
To da t e, engineering, cons truct ion, and licensing act ivities are proceeding as scheduled.
The docketing le t te r indica t ed that our res pons e to the que s t ions is required to su ppo rt preparation of a draf t SER. Based upon the date of receipt of many of our ques t ions , we be came conce rned that much of the needed input would not be provided in time to suppo rt draf ting a SER. Many of your la t er req ues t s fo r info rmat ion ask fo r our res pons e in le s s than the sixty days speci fi ed in our do cke t ing le t t er . Conve rs a t ions wi th you and your staf f failed to yield any commitmen* to assure input to the draft SER if DLC responses were provided by the requested dates.
On May 16,1983, DLC received a let ter indicat ing t'lat our ap plica-tion was acceptable fo r docke t ing.
It is now our unde rs t airling that the draft SER is viewed by the staf f only as a tool for monitoring the status of your review and that                     some b ranches routinely do net provide input fo r it.                 It is also our unde r s t and ing that the draft SER is not a critical path item in the lice ns ing schedule and will not af fect the final SER (which is on the cri t ical path).
This letter indicated that a single set of ques tions would be transmitted to DLC.
Based u pon this unde rs t and ing , you have agr eed to resched ule some of our r eques ted res pons e dates.           At t achment 1 prov ides a li s t of remaining questions and our present schedule for response.
These ques t ions, if provided in accordance with the lice ns ing sch ed ule, were to be provided by August 31, 1983.
8312270011 831221                                                                                  n0\
In actuality, DLC has received this set of ques t ions in several part s ranging from August 31, 1983, to November 18, 1983, with over half of these questions having been transmitted on September 19, 1983, or later.
V PDR ADOCK 05000412 E                             PDR                                                                   \\
The docketing le t te r indica t ed that our res pons e to the que s t ions is required to su ppo rt preparation of a draf t SER.
Based upon the date of receipt of many of our ques t ions, we be came conce rned that much of the needed input would not be provided in time to suppo rt draf ting a SER.
Many of your la t er req ues t s fo r info rmat ion ask fo r our res pons e in le s s than the sixty days speci fi ed in our do cke t ing le t t er.
Conve rs a t ions wi th you and your staf f failed to yield any commitmen* to assure input to the draft SER if DLC responses were provided by the requested dates.
It is now our unde rs t airling that the draft SER is viewed by the staf f only as a tool for monitoring the status of your review and that some b ranches routinely do net provide input fo r it.
It is also our unde r s t and ing that the draft SER is not a critical path item in the lice ns ing schedule and will not af fect the final SER (which is on the cri t ical path).
Based u pon this unde rs t and ing, you have agr eed to resched ule some of our a li s t of remaining r eques ted res pons e dates.
At t achment 1 prov ides questions and our present schedule for response.
n0\\
8312270011 831221 V
PDR ADOCK 05000412 E
PDR
\\\\


            - United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. George W. Knighton, Chief Page 2-We are aware of the heavy work load the revi ewe rs are experiencing because of several ot her plants be ing rev iewed on sched ules similar to BV-2.
    .-      Mr. George W. Knighton, Chief Page 2-We are aware of the heavy work load the revi ewe rs are experiencing because of several ot her plants be ing rev iewed on sched ules similar to BV-2.             At your suggestion, DLC welcomes the opportunity to meet with your reviewers in a series of workshops which will identify open items (if not provided in draf t SER) and close as raany items as pos sib le in support of a final SER. We intend to discuss and finalize a workshop schedule with your staff in January, 1984.               We ex pe ct , with your staf f's cont inued attent ion, that the December, 1985,.. fuel loading date for BV-2 will be achieved.
At your suggestion, DLC welcomes the opportunity to meet with your reviewers in a series of workshops which will identify open items (if not provided in draf t SER) and close as raany items as pos sib le in support of a final SER.
We intend to discuss and finalize a workshop schedule with your staff in January, 1984.
We ex pe ct, with your staf f's cont inued attent ion, that the December, 1985,.. fuel loading date for BV-2 will be achieved.
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY r
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY r
By             "k -
By "k -
R.     Washabaugh Pro et Manager
R.
,            GLB/wjs cc:       Mr. H. R. Denton, Director NRR Mr. G. Walton, NRC Res ident Ins pector Ms. L. Lazo, Project Manager Mr. D. Eisenhut , Director Division of Licensing i
Washabaugh Pro et Manager GLB/wjs cc:
Mr. H. R. Denton, Director NRR Mr. G. Walton, NRC Res ident Ins pector Ms. L. Lazo, Project Manager Mr. D. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing i
r l
r l
l l
l l
Line 45: Line 60:
1
1


--                                  ATTACHMENT l FSAR AMENDMENT 5 FEBRUARY 10, 1984 The following branch questions are scheduled for response in Amendment 5.
ATTACHMENT l FSAR AMENDMENT 5 FEBRUARY 10, 1984 The following branch questions are scheduled for response in Amendment 5.
Structural /Geotechnical Containment Systems Auxiliary Systems Environmental Hydrological Initial test}}
Structural /Geotechnical Containment Systems Auxiliary Systems Environmental Hydrological Initial test}}

Latest revision as of 06:07, 14 December 2024

Discusses Impact of Delayed Response to NRC Requests for Info to Support Accelerated Licensing Schedule.List of Remaining SER Questions & Present Schedule for Response Encl.Dec 1985 Fuel Load Date Should Be Achieved
ML20083C761
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 12/21/1983
From: Washabaugh R
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To: Knighton G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
ZNRC-3-101, NUDOCS 8312270011
Download: ML20083C761 (3)


Text

"

e

$V4s 2NRC-3-101 (412) 787 - 5141 (412)923 - 1960 Telecopy (412) 787-2629 Nuclear Construction Division December 21, 1983 Robinson Plaza, Building 2. Suite 210 Pittsburgh, PA 15205 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION:

Mr. George W. Knighton, Chie f Licens ing Branch 3 Of fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-412 Licensing Schedule Gentlemen:

During 'the June 7,1983, management meet ing, H. R. Denton indicated that he favored accelerating the Beaver Valley 2 (BV-2) licensing schedule.

A propos ed schedule was prov ided to Duquesne Light Company (DLC) at that meeting.

To da t e, engineering, cons truct ion, and licensing act ivities are proceeding as scheduled.

On May 16,1983, DLC received a let ter indicat ing t'lat our ap plica-tion was acceptable fo r docke t ing.

This letter indicated that a single set of ques tions would be transmitted to DLC.

These ques t ions, if provided in accordance with the lice ns ing sch ed ule, were to be provided by August 31, 1983.

In actuality, DLC has received this set of ques t ions in several part s ranging from August 31, 1983, to November 18, 1983, with over half of these questions having been transmitted on September 19, 1983, or later.

The docketing le t te r indica t ed that our res pons e to the que s t ions is required to su ppo rt preparation of a draf t SER.

Based upon the date of receipt of many of our ques t ions, we be came conce rned that much of the needed input would not be provided in time to suppo rt draf ting a SER.

Many of your la t er req ues t s fo r info rmat ion ask fo r our res pons e in le s s than the sixty days speci fi ed in our do cke t ing le t t er.

Conve rs a t ions wi th you and your staf f failed to yield any commitmen* to assure input to the draft SER if DLC responses were provided by the requested dates.

It is now our unde rs t airling that the draft SER is viewed by the staf f only as a tool for monitoring the status of your review and that some b ranches routinely do net provide input fo r it.

It is also our unde r s t and ing that the draft SER is not a critical path item in the lice ns ing schedule and will not af fect the final SER (which is on the cri t ical path).

Based u pon this unde rs t and ing, you have agr eed to resched ule some of our a li s t of remaining r eques ted res pons e dates.

At t achment 1 prov ides questions and our present schedule for response.

n0\\

8312270011 831221 V

PDR ADOCK 05000412 E

PDR

\\\\

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. George W. Knighton, Chief Page 2-We are aware of the heavy work load the revi ewe rs are experiencing because of several ot her plants be ing rev iewed on sched ules similar to BV-2.

At your suggestion, DLC welcomes the opportunity to meet with your reviewers in a series of workshops which will identify open items (if not provided in draf t SER) and close as raany items as pos sib le in support of a final SER.

We intend to discuss and finalize a workshop schedule with your staff in January, 1984.

We ex pe ct, with your staf f's cont inued attent ion, that the December, 1985,.. fuel loading date for BV-2 will be achieved.

DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY r

By "k -

R.

Washabaugh Pro et Manager GLB/wjs cc:

Mr. H. R. Denton, Director NRR Mr. G. Walton, NRC Res ident Ins pector Ms. L. Lazo, Project Manager Mr. D. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing i

r l

l l

?

I t

l-l I,

1

ATTACHMENT l FSAR AMENDMENT 5 FEBRUARY 10, 1984 The following branch questions are scheduled for response in Amendment 5.

Structural /Geotechnical Containment Systems Auxiliary Systems Environmental Hydrological Initial test