W3P84-1009, Advises That NRC 840330 Request for Info Re BTP Rsb 5-1 Satisfied,Per Sser 5.CEN-259, Evaluation of Natural Circulation Cooldown Test... Demonstrated Applicability of Natural Circulation/Boron Mixing Test: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:. .
{{#Wiki_filter:.
LOUISIANA               m onAnoNot sinar P OW E R & t.1G H T! e o not rum . Ntw onte AN9 LouivANA       70174
LOUISIANA P OW E R & t.1G H T! e o not rum. Ntw onte AN9 LouivANA 70174 m onAnoNot sinar
                                                                              = I5o41anoPJ45 NYSEMM April 12, 1984 W3P84-1009 3-Al.01.04 3-A20.20 Q-3-D31
= I5o41anoPJ45 NYSEMM April 12, 1984 W3P84-1009 3-Al.01.04 3-A20.20 Q-3-D31
    !)irector of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. C.W. Knighton, Chief 1,1cenning firanch No. 3 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Wanhington, D.C. 20555 SUBJECT       Waterford SES Unit 3 Docket No. 50-382 Auxiliary Pronnurizer Spray (APS)
!)irector of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. C.W. Knighton, Chief 1,1cenning firanch No. 3 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Wanhington, D.C. 20555 SUBJECT Waterford SES Unit 3 Docket No. 50-382 Auxiliary Pronnurizer Spray (APS)
REFERENCE     (1) 1.etter dated March 30, 1984 from Knighton (NRC) to I,cddick (I.PAI)
REFERENCE (1) 1.etter dated March 30, 1984 from Knighton (NRC) to I,cddick (I.PAI)
(2) W3P84-0505 dated February 29, 1984 Dear Sirt in your Reference (1) Intter you requented that I.PAI. provide a ncheduto committing to renolve the Staff concerna in regard to a potentini ningle failure vulnerability in the APS System. Specifically, to addrone the Staff'n concerna you requested ,luntification aufficient to demonstrate that the Waterford APS design meets the critorin of BTP RSn 5-1, and the criteria for systemg required for atcam genorntor tuho rupturn (SCTR) necident mitigation.
(2) W3P84-0505 dated February 29, 1984 Dear Sirt in your Reference (1) Intter you requented that I.PAI. provide a ncheduto committing to renolve the Staff concerna in regard to a potentini ningle failure vulnerability in the APS System. Specifically, to addrone the Staff'n concerna you requested,luntification aufficient to demonstrate that the Waterford APS design meets the critorin of BTP RSn 5-1, and the criteria for systemg required for atcam genorntor tuho rupturn (SCTR) necident mitigation.
An to the criterin of BTP RSR 5-1. Supplemant 5 to the Waterford SER (Section 5.4.3) indienten that we meet the ATP requirementn. Furthermorn, Reference (2) transmitted CEN-259, "An ?. valuation of the Naturnt Circulation Cooldown Tcat Performod at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station: Comptinnce With the Tonting Requiremente of hranch Technical Position RSB 5-l". While CEN-259 demonstrated the applienbility of tho SONCS naturni circulation /horon mixing tout to Watorford 3, it also reaf firmed our comptinnen with RTP RSB 5-1.         In particular it van demonstrated (in Sectiono 6.2 and 6.3) that the APS in not necennary for mooting the functionni requirements of BTP RSn 5-13 rather, in the unlikely event that the APS in unnvallable the finn 1 plant depreneurlantion enn be accomplished uning the safety-grado reactor coolant gna vent nyatom. Wo foot, therefore, that your requent for information on DTP RSH 5-1 han already been adequatcly mot and we have no plans for a further nuhmittal.
An to the criterin of BTP RSR 5-1. Supplemant 5 to the Waterford SER (Section 5.4.3) indienten that we meet the ATP requirementn.
Furthermorn, Reference (2) transmitted CEN-259, "An ?. valuation of the Naturnt Circulation Cooldown Tcat Performod at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station: Comptinnce With the Tonting Requiremente of hranch Technical Position RSB 5-l".
While CEN-259 demonstrated the applienbility of tho SONCS naturni circulation /horon mixing tout to Watorford 3, it also reaf firmed our comptinnen with RTP RSB 5-1.
In particular it van demonstrated (in Sectiono 6.2 and 6.3) that the APS in not necennary for mooting the functionni requirements of BTP RSn 5-13 rather, in the unlikely event that the APS in unnvallable the finn 1 plant depreneurlantion enn be accomplished uning the safety-grado reactor coolant gna vent nyatom. Wo foot, therefore, that your requent for information on DTP RSH 5-1 han already been adequatcly mot and we have no plans for a further nuhmittal.
f14041fl0372 Il40412
f14041fl0372 Il40412
{DHADocK050           >
{DHADocK050 OOl I'6 m
OOl I'6 m
 
* o l
o l
As to the APS/SGTR innuo. following discussions with your Mr. T. Marsh, the following schedule was agreed upon:
As to the APS/SGTR innuo. following discussions with your Mr. T. Marsh, the following schedule was agreed upon:
: 1. An acceptabit justif fention for interim operation will be submitted to the NRC prior to exceeding 5% power.
1.
: 2. Resolution of the SGTR innue should be reached within six months of receipt of the low power operating license. liardware changen, if necennary, will be completed on a schedule to be negotinted at n intor time, however, not prior to the first refueling outage.
An acceptabit justif fention for interim operation will be submitted to the NRC prior to exceeding 5% power.
It in our understanding that these commitments will form the basin for n licenso condition for Watorford 3. We request that the wording of the l       licongo condition be clear insofar as only the APS/SGTR napect of Reference I       (1) remaining for I.P&L action, and issuo "renolution" not requiring backfit implementation.
2.
Should you have any questions or comments in thin matter plenne contact Mike Mainner at ($04) 363-8938 Yourn " ry truly,
Resolution of the SGTR innue should be reached within six months of receipt of the low power operating license. liardware changen, if necennary, will be completed on a schedule to be negotinted at n intor time, however, not prior to the first refueling outage.
  , s.
It in our understanding that these commitments will form the basin for n licenso condition for Watorford 3.
C' '     ,4Trf.,
We request that the wording of the l
licongo condition be clear insofar as only the APS/SGTR napect of Reference I
(1) remaining for I.P&L action, and issuo "renolution" not requiring backfit implementation.
Should you have any questions or comments in thin matter plenne contact Mike Mainner at ($04) 363-8938 Yourn " ry truly, s.
C' '
,4Trf.
[
[
K. .' Cook S v2 i       Nucionr Support & Licongiug Mannger i
K..' Cook S v2 i
l       KWC/MJM/pco cci     E.L. Blake. W.H. Stevenson, J.T. Colline. D. H. Crutchfield.
Nucionr Support & Licongiug Mannger i
l KWC/MJM/pco cci E.L. Blake. W.H. Stevenson, J.T. Colline. D. H. Crutchfield.
J. Wilson, C.L. Constable. T. M,arnh. C. Liang l
J. Wilson, C.L. Constable. T. M,arnh. C. Liang l
i l
i l
,}}
,}}

Latest revision as of 06:21, 14 December 2024

Advises That NRC 840330 Request for Info Re BTP Rsb 5-1 Satisfied,Per Sser 5.CEN-259, Evaluation of Natural Circulation Cooldown Test... Demonstrated Applicability of Natural Circulation/Boron Mixing Test
ML20083M866
Person / Time
Site: Waterford 
Issue date: 04/12/1984
From: Cook K
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Knighton G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
W3P84-1009, NUDOCS 8404180372
Download: ML20083M866 (2)


Text

.

LOUISIANA P OW E R & t.1G H T! e o not rum. Ntw onte AN9 LouivANA 70174 m onAnoNot sinar

= I5o41anoPJ45 NYSEMM April 12, 1984 W3P84-1009 3-Al.01.04 3-A20.20 Q-3-D31

!)irector of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. C.W. Knighton, Chief 1,1cenning firanch No. 3 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Wanhington, D.C. 20555 SUBJECT Waterford SES Unit 3 Docket No. 50-382 Auxiliary Pronnurizer Spray (APS)

REFERENCE (1) 1.etter dated March 30, 1984 from Knighton (NRC) to I,cddick (I.PAI)

(2) W3P84-0505 dated February 29, 1984 Dear Sirt in your Reference (1) Intter you requented that I.PAI. provide a ncheduto committing to renolve the Staff concerna in regard to a potentini ningle failure vulnerability in the APS System. Specifically, to addrone the Staff'n concerna you requested,luntification aufficient to demonstrate that the Waterford APS design meets the critorin of BTP RSn 5-1, and the criteria for systemg required for atcam genorntor tuho rupturn (SCTR) necident mitigation.

An to the criterin of BTP RSR 5-1. Supplemant 5 to the Waterford SER (Section 5.4.3) indienten that we meet the ATP requirementn.

Furthermorn, Reference (2) transmitted CEN-259, "An ?. valuation of the Naturnt Circulation Cooldown Tcat Performod at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station: Comptinnce With the Tonting Requiremente of hranch Technical Position RSB 5-l".

While CEN-259 demonstrated the applienbility of tho SONCS naturni circulation /horon mixing tout to Watorford 3, it also reaf firmed our comptinnen with RTP RSB 5-1.

In particular it van demonstrated (in Sectiono 6.2 and 6.3) that the APS in not necennary for mooting the functionni requirements of BTP RSn 5-13 rather, in the unlikely event that the APS in unnvallable the finn 1 plant depreneurlantion enn be accomplished uning the safety-grado reactor coolant gna vent nyatom. Wo foot, therefore, that your requent for information on DTP RSH 5-1 han already been adequatcly mot and we have no plans for a further nuhmittal.

f14041fl0372 Il40412

{DHADocK050 OOl I'6 m

o l

As to the APS/SGTR innuo. following discussions with your Mr. T. Marsh, the following schedule was agreed upon:

1.

An acceptabit justif fention for interim operation will be submitted to the NRC prior to exceeding 5% power.

2.

Resolution of the SGTR innue should be reached within six months of receipt of the low power operating license. liardware changen, if necennary, will be completed on a schedule to be negotinted at n intor time, however, not prior to the first refueling outage.

It in our understanding that these commitments will form the basin for n licenso condition for Watorford 3.

We request that the wording of the l

licongo condition be clear insofar as only the APS/SGTR napect of Reference I

(1) remaining for I.P&L action, and issuo "renolution" not requiring backfit implementation.

Should you have any questions or comments in thin matter plenne contact Mike Mainner at ($04) 363-8938 Yourn " ry truly, s.

C' '

,4Trf.

[

K..' Cook S v2 i

Nucionr Support & Licongiug Mannger i

l KWC/MJM/pco cci E.L. Blake. W.H. Stevenson, J.T. Colline. D. H. Crutchfield.

J. Wilson, C.L. Constable. T. M,arnh. C. Liang l

i l

,