ML20099G845: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-   __      _ .    . _      _      -                .        _    ._        _        .
{{#Wiki_filter:-
4 APPL Ex.95
4 APPL Ex.95
                    ~
~
p s
p s
MEF: 4*[
MEF: 4*[
                                                                                                            /
/
:        n== = ,   %
n== =,
                      )fr. Dcyte Grier, Directer                                       ll-1    MC b
)fr. Dcyte Grier, Directer ll-b United States Nuclear Reguistory Cornissic.n 1
United States Nuclear Reguistory Cornissic.n Office of Inspection and Enforcesant, Rs2i on I                 g DoccTr:ta   9GS4,%y a   ,
MC 9GS4,%y Office of Inspection and Enforcesant, Rs2 on I i
631 Ptrk Avenue                                                         A licssaancu                    .
g A licssaancu DoccTr:ta a 631 Ptrk Avenue King of Prussia. PA 19406 Q ~~3nsc g
King of Prussia. PA       19406                                     Q ~~3nsc g I
I h
\\


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
USNRC IE;I Letter dated May 10, 1978 hdl 4 \                          -
USNRC IE;I Letter dated May 10, 1978 dl 4 Re: Site Inspection of March 30 and April 3-7, 1974 Inspection Report No. 50-332/78-03 Limerick Generating Station - Units 1 6 2 7
Re: Site Inspection of March 30 and April 3-7, 1974                                     .
l
Inspection Report No. 50-332/78-03 7    %        Limerick Generating Station - Units 1 6 2 l
)
                                    )     Pile: Qual 1-2-2 (352/18-031 4
Pile:
Qual 1-2-2 (352/18-031 4
Dear Mr. Grier In response to the subject letter regarding an itoa identified during the subject inspection of construction activities authorized by MRC License Nos. CPPR-146 and -107, we transmit herewith the followi ng:
Dear Mr. Grier In response to the subject letter regarding an itoa identified during the subject inspection of construction activities authorized by MRC License Nos. CPPR-146 and -107, we transmit herewith the followi ng:
O                                                                                                                 -
O i
i                                          Attachment I - Response to Appendiz A
Attachment I - Response to Appendiz A
{';                                                                                 .
{';
F                             . Should you have ar.y questions concerning this ites, we would be pleased to discuss them with you.                                                 ,
F
. Should you have ar.y questions concerning this ites, we would be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
                                                                                    *G V. S. Boyer Yf
*G Yf V. S. Boyer
                    /'.JC:JJP:crs                                                                                       ,
/'.JC:JJP:crs v Attachment bec:
v Attachment bec: R. H. Elias, Sechtel                                                                                   .
R. H. Elias, Sechtel J. S. Xemper E. J. Bradley G. White E. C. Xistner H. R. Waltert/ Local File (2) #
J. S. Xemper E. J. Bradley                                                                                         ,
J. J. Clarey R. A. Mulford J. M. Corcarsn 4
G. White E. C. Xistner H. R. Waltert/ Local File (2) #
W. J. Johnson i
J. J. Clarey R. A. Mulford                                                                     -
Project File (2)
J. M. Corcarsn                                                                     4 W. J. Johnson                                                                     i Project File (2)
W en y
W                                                                                                           en   y PDR                                                                       ...
PDR Q
Q                                                                             .
: v... n 2.:
: v. . . n           2.:             :::e :. s . u. . :: , :. i .-                                             .c
:::e :. s. u.. ::, :. i.-
  'n.
.c I
I            -
'n.
ATTACEMINT I (V~T                   .
ATTACEMINT I (V~T
                  .f Easconse'cc Iten of Nonce =clianca Infrae: ion                                                                 ,
.f Easconse'cc Iten of Nonce =clianca Infrae: ion 10CFR 5'0, Appendix 3, Criterion V, statas, in part, ths::
10CFR 5'0, Appendix 3, Criterion V, statas, in part, ths::
"Activi:tas affec:ing quality shall be prescribed by documen:ed instructions, proceduras, or drawings...and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings."
                                        "Activi:tas affec:ing quality shall be prescribed by documen:ed                                                               -
The Lisarick PSAR, Appendix D",
instructions, proceduras, or drawings...and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings."
Quality Assurance Program, Paragraph D.6.4, s:staa, in part, that: "Bechtel Construction Department...is responsible for construction of the plant to approved anginaaring specifications, drawings, and procedures..."
The Lisarick PSAR, Appendix D", Quality Assurance Program, Paragraph D.6.4, s:staa, in part, that: "Bechtel Construction Department...is responsible for construction of the plant to approved anginaaring specifications, drawings, and procedures..."
Liquid Pana: rant Test Proceduie !??T-340-39-02, Revision 0 of the Peabody Testics, Inc., a testing subcontractor for the 3echtal Construction Department, states, in part, that "Any indication in excess of the acceptance standards (1/16") which is believed to be nonzalavant, shall be regarded as a defect and shall be re-examined to verify whether or not actual defacts are present."
Liquid Pana: rant Test Proceduie !??T-340-39-02, Revision 0 of the Peabody Testics, Inc., a testing subcontractor for the 3echtal Construction Department, states, in part, that "Any indication in excess of the acceptance standards (1/16") which is believed to be nonzalavant, shall be regarded as a defect and shall be re-examined to verify whether or not actual defacts are present."
ro Contrary to :he above, on April 7, 1973, a liquid penetran:
ro Contrary to :he above, on April 7, 1973, a liquid penetran:
(_;                    cast          parformed on pips vald H3C-183-1-FW-8 resultad in developed indications in excess of the acceptance standard o' 1/16" and 1:
parformed on pips vald H3C-183-1-FW-8 resultad in developed cast
(_;
indications in excess of the acceptance standard o' 1/16" and 1:
was not verified if actual datects vara present.
was not verified if actual datects vara present.
        .                                Resoonse On April 11, 1978 a liquid panatrant :ast was again performed
Resoonse On April 11, 1978 a liquid panatrant :ast was again performed on pipe wald H3C-133-1-FW-8.
        .                                on pipe wald H3C-133-1-FW-8.                                           The tas: was performed by a j                                 qualified exa=inar and was witnessea by evo persona qualified                                             to SNT-TC-1A Level III and by the Auchbrized Inspector.                                             Natcher the           - -
The tas: was performed by a j
i
qualified exa=inar and was witnessea by evo persona qualified to SNT-TC-1A Level III and by the Auchbrized Inspector.
        ~
Natcher the i
                  -                      axaminar nor the witnessaa observed any indications which excaaded the acceptanca standard of 1/16". The raport of this test, which states that the vald is acceptable, is on file.                                                                                 1 1
axaminar nor the witnessaa observed any indications which excaaded
l Ii I/1 50-35I/73-C3 C                                                                                                                                 ..          .
~
N     g
the acceptanca standard of 1/16".
                                                                                                                                                                    .L
The raport of this test, which states that the vald is acceptable, is on file.
                  . - . - ,      .-w.-     - , _ . , , _ , _ , , , , , . , _ _ _ _ , . _ _ , , _ _, _            _}}
1 1
l I
i I/1 50-35I/73-C3 C
N g
.L
.-w.-
_}}

Latest revision as of 07:30, 13 December 2024

Applicant Exhibit A-95,consisting of Undated Ltr Responding to NRC Re Noncompliance Noted in Insp Rept 50-352/78-03 on 780330 & 0403-07
ML20099G845
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  
Issue date: 05/07/1984
From: Boyer V
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To: Grier B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
OL-A-095, OL-A-95, NUDOCS 8411270458
Download: ML20099G845 (3)
v • d • e


Text

-

4 APPL Ex.95

~

p s

MEF: 4*[

/

n== =,

)fr. Dcyte Grier, Directer ll-b United States Nuclear Reguistory Cornissic.n 1

MC 9GS4,%y Office of Inspection and Enforcesant, Rs2 on I i

g A licssaancu DoccTr:ta a 631 Ptrk Avenue King of Prussia. PA 19406 Q ~~3nsc g

I h

\\

Subject:

USNRC IE;I Letter dated May 10, 1978 dl 4 Re: Site Inspection of March 30 and April 3-7, 1974 Inspection Report No. 50-332/78-03 Limerick Generating Station - Units 1 6 2 7

l

)

Pile:

Qual 1-2-2 (352/18-031 4

Dear Mr. Grier In response to the subject letter regarding an itoa identified during the subject inspection of construction activities authorized by MRC License Nos. CPPR-146 and -107, we transmit herewith the followi ng:

O i

Attachment I - Response to Appendiz A

{';

F

. Should you have ar.y questions concerning this ites, we would be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

  • G Yf V. S. Boyer

/'.JC:JJP:crs v Attachment bec:

R. H. Elias, Sechtel J. S. Xemper E. J. Bradley G. White E. C. Xistner H. R. Waltert/ Local File (2) #

J. J. Clarey R. A. Mulford J. M. Corcarsn 4

W. J. Johnson i

Project File (2)

W en y

PDR Q

v... n 2.:
e :. s. u.. ::, :. i.-

.c I

'n.

ATTACEMINT I (V~T

.f Easconse'cc Iten of Nonce =clianca Infrae: ion 10CFR 5'0, Appendix 3, Criterion V, statas, in part, ths::

"Activi:tas affec:ing quality shall be prescribed by documen:ed instructions, proceduras, or drawings...and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings."

The Lisarick PSAR, Appendix D",

Quality Assurance Program, Paragraph D.6.4, s:staa, in part, that: "Bechtel Construction Department...is responsible for construction of the plant to approved anginaaring specifications, drawings, and procedures..."

Liquid Pana: rant Test Proceduie !??T-340-39-02, Revision 0 of the Peabody Testics, Inc., a testing subcontractor for the 3echtal Construction Department, states, in part, that "Any indication in excess of the acceptance standards (1/16") which is believed to be nonzalavant, shall be regarded as a defect and shall be re-examined to verify whether or not actual defacts are present."

ro Contrary to :he above, on April 7, 1973, a liquid penetran:

parformed on pips vald H3C-183-1-FW-8 resultad in developed cast

(_;

indications in excess of the acceptance standard o' 1/16" and 1:

was not verified if actual datects vara present.

Resoonse On April 11, 1978 a liquid panatrant :ast was again performed on pipe wald H3C-133-1-FW-8.

The tas: was performed by a j

qualified exa=inar and was witnessea by evo persona qualified to SNT-TC-1A Level III and by the Auchbrized Inspector.

Natcher the i

axaminar nor the witnessaa observed any indications which excaaded

~

the acceptanca standard of 1/16".

The raport of this test, which states that the vald is acceptable, is on file.

1 1

l I

i I/1 50-35I/73-C3 C

N g

.L

.-w.-

_

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20099G845&oldid=4313232"