ML20099G845

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Applicant Exhibit A-95,consisting of Undated Ltr Responding to NRC Re Noncompliance Noted in Insp Rept 50-352/78-03 on 780330 & 0403-07
ML20099G845
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  
Issue date: 05/07/1984
From: Boyer V
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To: Grier B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
OL-A-095, OL-A-95, NUDOCS 8411270458
Download: ML20099G845 (3)


Text

-

4 APPL Ex.95

~

p s

MEF: 4*[

/

n== =,

)fr. Dcyte Grier, Directer ll-b United States Nuclear Reguistory Cornissic.n 1

MC 9GS4,%y Office of Inspection and Enforcesant, Rs2 on I i

g A licssaancu DoccTr:ta a 631 Ptrk Avenue King of Prussia. PA 19406 Q ~~3nsc g

I h

\\

Subject:

USNRC IE;I Letter dated May 10, 1978 dl 4 Re: Site Inspection of March 30 and April 3-7, 1974 Inspection Report No. 50-332/78-03 Limerick Generating Station - Units 1 6 2 7

l

)

Pile:

Qual 1-2-2 (352/18-031 4

Dear Mr. Grier In response to the subject letter regarding an itoa identified during the subject inspection of construction activities authorized by MRC License Nos. CPPR-146 and -107, we transmit herewith the followi ng:

O i

Attachment I - Response to Appendiz A

{';

F

. Should you have ar.y questions concerning this ites, we would be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

  • G Yf V. S. Boyer

/'.JC:JJP:crs v Attachment bec:

R. H. Elias, Sechtel J. S. Xemper E. J. Bradley G. White E. C. Xistner H. R. Waltert/ Local File (2) #

J. J. Clarey R. A. Mulford J. M. Corcarsn 4

W. J. Johnson i

Project File (2)

W en y

PDR Q

v... n 2.:
e :. s. u.. ::, :. i.-

.c I

'n.

ATTACEMINT I (V~T

.f Easconse'cc Iten of Nonce =clianca Infrae: ion 10CFR 5'0, Appendix 3, Criterion V, statas, in part, ths::

"Activi:tas affec:ing quality shall be prescribed by documen:ed instructions, proceduras, or drawings...and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings."

The Lisarick PSAR, Appendix D",

Quality Assurance Program, Paragraph D.6.4, s:staa, in part, that: "Bechtel Construction Department...is responsible for construction of the plant to approved anginaaring specifications, drawings, and procedures..."

Liquid Pana: rant Test Proceduie !??T-340-39-02, Revision 0 of the Peabody Testics, Inc., a testing subcontractor for the 3echtal Construction Department, states, in part, that "Any indication in excess of the acceptance standards (1/16") which is believed to be nonzalavant, shall be regarded as a defect and shall be re-examined to verify whether or not actual defacts are present."

ro Contrary to :he above, on April 7, 1973, a liquid penetran:

parformed on pips vald H3C-183-1-FW-8 resultad in developed cast

(_;

indications in excess of the acceptance standard o' 1/16" and 1:

was not verified if actual datects vara present.

Resoonse On April 11, 1978 a liquid panatrant :ast was again performed on pipe wald H3C-133-1-FW-8.

The tas: was performed by a j

qualified exa=inar and was witnessea by evo persona qualified to SNT-TC-1A Level III and by the Auchbrized Inspector.

Natcher the i

axaminar nor the witnessaa observed any indications which excaaded

~

the acceptanca standard of 1/16".

The raport of this test, which states that the vald is acceptable, is on file.

1 1

l I

i I/1 50-35I/73-C3 C

N g

.L

.-w.-

_