ML20099G845

Applicant Exhibit A-95,consisting of Undated Ltr Responding to NRC Re Noncompliance Noted in Insp Rept 50-352/78-03 on 780330 & 0403-07

ML20099G845
Person / Time
Site:	Limerick
Issue date:	05/07/1984
From:	Boyer V PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:	Grier B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
OL-A-095, OL-A-95, NUDOCS 8411270458
Download: ML20099G845 (3)

Text

- __ _ . . _ _ - . _ ._ _ .

4 APPL Ex.95

~

p s

MEF: 4*[

/

n== = ,  %

)fr. Dcyte Grier, Directer ll-1 MC b

United States Nuclear Reguistory Cornissic.n Office of Inspection and Enforcesant, Rs2i on I g DoccTr:ta 9GS4,%y a ,

631 Ptrk Avenue A licssaancu .

King of Prussia. PA 19406 Q ~~3nsc g I

Subject:

USNRC IE;I Letter dated May 10, 1978 hdl 4 \ -

Re: Site Inspection of March 30 and April 3-7, 1974 .

Inspection Report No. 50-332/78-03 7  % Limerick Generating Station - Units 1 6 2 l

) Pile: Qual 1-2-2 (352/18-031 4

Dear Mr. Grier In response to the subject letter regarding an itoa identified during the subject inspection of construction activities authorized by MRC License Nos. CPPR-146 and -107, we transmit herewith the followi ng:

O -

i Attachment I - Response to Appendiz A

{'; .

F . Should you have ar.y questions concerning this ites, we would be pleased to discuss them with you. ,

Sincerely,

• G V. S. Boyer Yf

/'.JC:JJP:crs ,

v Attachment bec: R. H. Elias, Sechtel .

J. S. Xemper E. J. Bradley ,

G. White E. C. Xistner H. R. Waltert/ Local File (2) #

J. J. Clarey R. A. Mulford -

J. M. Corcarsn 4 W. J. Johnson i Project File (2)

W en y PDR ...

Q .

v. . . n 2.:  :::e :. s . u. . :: , :. i .- .c

'n.

I -

ATTACEMINT I (V~T .

.f Easconse'cc Iten of Nonce =clianca Infrae: ion ,

10CFR 5'0, Appendix 3, Criterion V, statas, in part, ths::

"Activi:tas affec:ing quality shall be prescribed by documen:ed -

instructions, proceduras, or drawings...and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings."

The Lisarick PSAR, Appendix D", Quality Assurance Program, Paragraph D.6.4, s:staa, in part, that: "Bechtel Construction Department...is responsible for construction of the plant to approved anginaaring specifications, drawings, and procedures..."

Liquid Pana: rant Test Proceduie !??T-340-39-02, Revision 0 of the Peabody Testics, Inc., a testing subcontractor for the 3echtal Construction Department, states, in part, that "Any indication in excess of the acceptance standards (1/16") which is believed to be nonzalavant, shall be regarded as a defect and shall be re-examined to verify whether or not actual defacts are present."

ro Contrary to :he above, on April 7, 1973, a liquid penetran:

(_; cast parformed on pips vald H3C-183-1-FW-8 resultad in developed indications in excess of the acceptance standard o' 1/16" and 1:

was not verified if actual datects vara present.

. Resoonse On April 11, 1978 a liquid panatrant :ast was again performed

. on pipe wald H3C-133-1-FW-8. The tas: was performed by a j qualified exa=inar and was witnessea by evo persona qualified to SNT-TC-1A Level III and by the Auchbrized Inspector. Natcher the - -

i

~

- axaminar nor the witnessaa observed any indications which excaaded the acceptanca standard of 1/16". The raport of this test, which states that the vald is acceptable, is on file. 1 1

l Ii I/1 50-35I/73-C3 C .. .

N g

.L

. - . - , .-w.- - , _ . , , _ , _ , , , , , . , _ _ _ _ , . _ _ , , _ _, _ _