ML20114D212: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:O
{{#Wiki_filter:O
  ~
~
rnCKET NtMBER UOPOSED RULE N 71                 -
rnCKET NtMBER UOPOSED RULE N 71 9
9 (57FR 1 H 45.)                                   M N2 M 27 Pd :25
(57FR 1 H 45.)
                                                                                .i : q.   ;
M N2 M 27 Pd :25
NChi ,y , , f."       ~ ' '
.i : q.
bi, A Nc q' ' ' O   j To the Secretary of t p ommission.
NChi,y,, f."
                                                                              ~
~ ' '
bi, A Nc q' ' ' O j
To the Secretary of t p ommission.
~
I am a Michigan resident opposed to dry cask storage of high-level nuclear vas_tejat Palisades nuclear opwer plant.
I am a Michigan resident opposed to dry cask storage of high-level nuclear vas_tejat Palisades nuclear opwer plant.
Without general public. notification or imput we have been sited for a high-level waste dump, 150 ydl. from Lake Michigan, 1/5 the world's fresh water. This deadly waste
Without general public. notification or imput we have been sited for a high-level waste dump, 150 ydl. from Lake Michigan, 1/5 the world's fresh water. This deadly waste cannot be stored safely anywhere, so we will most likely be a permanent regional dump. N0! The D.O.E. has stated they will not be liable for these vastes if an interim site is not butit by 1998, a date the Government Accounting Office states is unlikely. Therefore I ask for wg cntsTt.getE TMlS H AL ARD feR FO'Tv flg Q GME F f+T't0 Tf 5
                ,  cannot be stored safely anywhere, so we will most likely be a permanent regional dump. N0! The D.O.E. has stated they will not be liable for these vastes if an interim site is not butit by 1998, a date the Government Accounting Office states is unlikely. Therefore I ask for wg cntsTt.getE TMlS H AL ARD feR FO'Tv flg Q GME F f+T't0 Tf 5
: 1. full democratic process in the crucial decision.
: 1. full democratic process in the crucial decision.
: 2. full public hearings held in the sited area.
: 2. full public hearings held in the sited area.
: 3. an enviromental impact statement filed with the EPA and                 D the State of Michigan.
D
: 4. a full cost / benefit analysis he done er.aming the cost of g
: 3. an enviromental impact statement filed with the EPA and the State of Michigan.
.:                    nuclear power and examine other sources of energy.
: 4. a full cost / benefit analysis he done er.aming the cost of g Cl-R RENCC W R b OP8 49/A ITRRNEf %7RMYERSE h1tC H, >l nuclear power and examine other sources of energy.
Cl-R RENCC W R b OP8 49/A ITRRNEf %7RMYERSE h1tC H, >l                           ..
,a ep
                                                    ,a ep
+
                                                                +
5 9209080029 920827 PDR PR 72 57FR2Bb45 PDR
5 9209080029 920827 PDR PR 72 57FR2Bb45       PDR


t 4
t 4
C. T. KROUPA
C. T. KROUPA 49f M AWY M SE,
        '                                          SE,                           %                                  _ - ~ -
_ - ~ -
49f M AWY M                                                      W                        -        -              -
l TMvERSE 01Y.
l     TMvERSE 01Y.                       %84 *sh3Q                   '-                                              R   =~g +  n
%84 *sh3Q W
                      . .=..                                R      .            ~ cyh-c ' Y                       .;-
R =~g s
                                    ... % Z,. &' 3 3       s 3 en%pf "j.;'];
~ cy c ' Y
                                                    "'6     fl                   ~
... Z,. &' 3 3 3 n
R h-
+
..=..
en%pf "j.;'];
"'6 fl
~
Q 3
Q 3
: g.                .
g.
                                      -r SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION
-r SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION
                            ,s,   sia           NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION-WASHINGTON D.C. 20555
,s, sia NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION-WASHINGTON D.C. 20555
                                                              *                                  - p ; .. .
- p ;...
Attentions Docketing and Service Bran'ch
Attentions Docketing and Service Bran'ch
                                                        .      Y m y. :.n;- s - -?           ?                . . .
-?
                                  %  t 3,_.
Y m y. :.n;- s -
                                                                                                  ~
?
                                                                                                    /J) c                             ._
3,_. /J) c t
            *N-   'tw $ -
~
y k   khh!
*N-
_'  k
'tw $ -
                                                                                                                            ?
k y
k khh!
?
0
0
                            .           . . . .            -       _ _ .                                                                  ,}}
.-}}

Latest revision as of 23:53, 12 December 2024

Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Dry Cask Storage of High Level Waste at Plant
ML20114D212
Person / Time
Site: Palisades 
Issue date: 08/27/1992
From: Kroupa C
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-57FR28645, RULE-PR-72 57FR28645-00019, 57FR28645-19, NUDOCS 9209080029
Download: ML20114D212 (2)
v • d • e


Text

O

~

rnCKET NtMBER UOPOSED RULE N 71 9

(57FR 1 H 45.)

M N2 M 27 Pd :25

.i : q.

NChi,y,, f."

~ ' '

bi, A Nc q' ' ' O j

To the Secretary of t p ommission.

~

I am a Michigan resident opposed to dry cask storage of high-level nuclear vas_tejat Palisades nuclear opwer plant.

Without general public. notification or imput we have been sited for a high-level waste dump, 150 ydl. from Lake Michigan, 1/5 the world's fresh water. This deadly waste cannot be stored safely anywhere, so we will most likely be a permanent regional dump. N0! The D.O.E. has stated they will not be liable for these vastes if an interim site is not butit by 1998, a date the Government Accounting Office states is unlikely. Therefore I ask for wg cntsTt.getE TMlS H AL ARD feR FO'Tv flg Q GME F f+T't0 Tf 5

1. full democratic process in the crucial decision.
2. full public hearings held in the sited area.

D

3. an enviromental impact statement filed with the EPA and the State of Michigan.
4. a full cost / benefit analysis he done er.aming the cost of g Cl-R RENCC W R b OP8 49/A ITRRNEf %7RMYERSE h1tC H, >l nuclear power and examine other sources of energy.

,a ep

+

5 9209080029 920827 PDR PR 72 57FR2Bb45 PDR

t 4

C. T. KROUPA 49f M AWY M SE,

_ - ~ -

l TMvERSE 01Y.

%84 *sh3Q W

R =~g s

~ cy c ' Y

... Z,. &' 3 3 3 n

R h-

+

..=..

en%pf "j.;'];

"'6 fl

~

Q 3

g.

-r SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION

,s, sia NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION-WASHINGTON D.C. 20555

- p ;...

Attentions Docketing and Service Bran'ch

-?

Y m y. :.n;- s -

?

3,_. /J) c t

~

  • N-

'tw $ -

k y

k khh!

?

0

.-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20114D212&oldid=4290163"