ML20128F560: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:. .-
{{#Wiki_filter:.
                .                                                                      GNL 94-02
GNL 94-02
                =
=
PECO NUCLEAR                                                   esco e c -
PECO NUCLEAR esco e c -
A Unit of PECO Energy                                         $[d[PI1m$$1 September 30,1996 Docket Nos. 50-352 50-353 Ucense Nos. NPF-39 NPF-85 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington DC 20555
A Unit of PECO Energy
$[d[PI1m$$1 September 30,1996 Docket Nos. 50-352 50-353 Ucense Nos. NPF-39 NPF-85 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington DC 20555


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 26: Line 27:
Gentlemen:
Gentlemen:
PECO Energy letter to NRC dated September 9,1994 provided our response to Generic Letter 94-02, "Long Term Solutions and Upgrade of Interim Operating Recommendations For Thermal Hydraulic Instabilities in Boiling Water Reactors,"
PECO Energy letter to NRC dated September 9,1994 provided our response to Generic Letter 94-02, "Long Term Solutions and Upgrade of Interim Operating Recommendations For Thermal Hydraulic Instabilities in Boiling Water Reactors,"
together with a proposed schedule for implementation of the Enhanced Option 1-A Stability Solution at Limerick Generating Station (LGS) Units 1 and 2. The schedule was based on preliminary information received from the Boiling Water Reactor Owners' Group (BWROG) and contingent upon NRC approval of the BWROG methodology (i.e., NEDO-32339, " Reactor Stability Long Term Solution:
together with a proposed schedule for implementation of the Enhanced Option 1-A Stability Solution at Limerick Generating Station (LGS) Units 1 and 2.
The schedule was based on preliminary information received from the Boiling Water Reactor Owners' Group (BWROG) and contingent upon NRC approval of the BWROG methodology (i.e., NEDO-32339, " Reactor Stability Long Term Solution:
Enhanced Option 1-A").
Enhanced Option 1-A").
Due to significant hardware delays (i.e., Period Based Detection System (PBDS) and Flow Control Trip Reference (FCTR) cards), it is necessary to revise the schedule for submitting the associated Technical Specifications Change Request (TSCR) to the NRC and for implementing the Enhanced Option I-A Stability Solution at LGS Units 1 and 2, as follows:
Due to significant hardware delays (i.e., Period Based Detection System (PBDS) and Flow Control Trip Reference (FCTR) cards), it is necessary to revise the schedule for submitting the associated Technical Specifications Change Request (TSCR) to the NRC and for implementing the Enhanced Option I-A Stability Solution at LGS Units 1 and 2, as follows:
961000o122 96o93o
/ h)D[ ' D 961000o122 96o93o PDR ADOCK o500o352 P
                                                                                              / h)D[ ' D PDR     ADOCK o500o352 P                       PDR 000021
PDR 000021


l
=
          =
b September 30,1996 Page 2 Original Forecast Date Projected Date LGS Unit 1
b September 30,1996 Page 2 Original Forecast Date         Projected Date LGS Unit 1
- Submit TSCR 3096 1 O98
                - Submit TSCR                       3096                       1 O98
- Implement Solution I-A 1 O97 3098 LGS Unit 2
                - Implement Solution I-A           1 O97                       3098 LGS Unit 2
- Submit TSCR 3097 1 O98
                - Submit TSCR                       3097                       1 O98
- Implement Solution I-A 1 O98 3098 The proposed deferral date for implementation of the solution is based on current best estimate projected hardware delivery schedules (i.e., the PBDS and FCTR cards), and time needed to accumulate operational experience before final implementation. We anticipate an NRC review period of six months following the TSCR submittal.
                - Implement Solution I-A           1 O98                       3098 The proposed deferral date for implementation of the solution is based on current best estimate projected hardware delivery schedules (i.e., the PBDS and FCTR cards), and time needed to accumulate operational experience before final implementation. We anticipate an NRC review period of six months following the TSCR submittal.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
                                      ,f1.
,f1.
G. A. Hunger, r.
G. A. Hunger, r.
Director - Ucensing cc:     H. J. Miller, Administrator, Region I, USNRC N. S. Perry, Senior Resident inspector, LGS}}
Director - Ucensing cc:
H. J. Miller, Administrator, Region I, USNRC N. S. Perry, Senior Resident inspector, LGS
.}}

Latest revision as of 14:04, 12 December 2024

Submits Response to NRC Generic Ltr 94-02, Long-Term Solutions & Upgrade of Interim Operating Recommendations for Thermal Hydraulic Instabilities in Bwrs
ML20128F560
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  
Issue date: 09/30/1996
From: Hunger G
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
GL-94-02, GL-94-2, NUDOCS 9610080122
Download: ML20128F560 (2)


Text

.

GNL 94-02

=

PECO NUCLEAR esco e c -

A Unit of PECO Energy

$[d[PI1m$$1 September 30,1996 Docket Nos. 50-352 50-353 Ucense Nos. NPF-39 NPF-85 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington DC 20555

Subject:

Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Response to NRC Generic Letter 94-02, "Long Term Solutions and Upgrade of Interim Operating Recommendations For Thermal Hydraulic Instabilities in Boiling Water Reactors."

Gentlemen:

PECO Energy letter to NRC dated September 9,1994 provided our response to Generic Letter 94-02, "Long Term Solutions and Upgrade of Interim Operating Recommendations For Thermal Hydraulic Instabilities in Boiling Water Reactors,"

together with a proposed schedule for implementation of the Enhanced Option 1-A Stability Solution at Limerick Generating Station (LGS) Units 1 and 2.

The schedule was based on preliminary information received from the Boiling Water Reactor Owners' Group (BWROG) and contingent upon NRC approval of the BWROG methodology (i.e., NEDO-32339, " Reactor Stability Long Term Solution:

Enhanced Option 1-A").

Due to significant hardware delays (i.e., Period Based Detection System (PBDS) and Flow Control Trip Reference (FCTR) cards), it is necessary to revise the schedule for submitting the associated Technical Specifications Change Request (TSCR) to the NRC and for implementing the Enhanced Option I-A Stability Solution at LGS Units 1 and 2, as follows:

/ h)D[ ' D 961000o122 96o93o PDR ADOCK o500o352 P

PDR 000021

=

b September 30,1996 Page 2 Original Forecast Date Projected Date LGS Unit 1

- Submit TSCR 3096 1 O98

- Implement Solution I-A 1 O97 3098 LGS Unit 2

- Submit TSCR 3097 1 O98

- Implement Solution I-A 1 O98 3098 The proposed deferral date for implementation of the solution is based on current best estimate projected hardware delivery schedules (i.e., the PBDS and FCTR cards), and time needed to accumulate operational experience before final implementation. We anticipate an NRC review period of six months following the TSCR submittal.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,

,f1.

G. A. Hunger, r.

Director - Ucensing cc:

H. J. Miller, Administrator, Region I, USNRC N. S. Perry, Senior Resident inspector, LGS

.