ML20132E423: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:e                                                                              Ct-tion Support Department
{{#Wiki_filter:Ct-tion Support Department e
    .  -. t, g                                                                                     10 CFR 50.46 PECO NUCLEAR                                                             nco%c-A Unit of PECO Energy                                                     fyf$$[$$ #
-. t, g
10 CFR 50.46 PECO NUCLEAR nco%c-A Unit of PECO Energy fyf$$[$$ #
December 16,1996 Docket Nos. 50-352 50-353 License Nos. NPF-39 NPF-85 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Cnntrol Desk Washingtort DC 20555
December 16,1996 Docket Nos. 50-352 50-353 License Nos. NPF-39 NPF-85 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Cnntrol Desk Washingtort DC 20555


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 10CFR50.46 Reporting Requirements Gentlemen:
Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 10CFR50.46 Reporting Requirements Gentlemen:
General Electric Company (GE) recently had discussions with the NRC staff regarding reporting of changes and errors in approved ECCS evaluation models as required by 10CFR50.46(a)(3)(l) and (ii), and has informed us about these issues via GE letter to PECO Energy dated November 9,1996. Since the 1988 revision to 10 CFR 50.46, GE has been compiling all changes and errors in approved GE ECCS evaluation methods and providing that information to the NRC and to licensees on an annual basis. The NRC staff has informed GE that each licensee must file its own annual report for each licensed plant. Therefore, this letter provides the latest information         .
General Electric Company (GE) recently had discussions with the NRC staff regarding reporting of changes and errors in approved ECCS evaluation models as required by 10CFR50.46(a)(3)(l) and (ii), and has informed us about these issues via GE letter to PECO Energy dated November 9,1996. Since the 1988 revision to 10 CFR 50.46, GE has been compiling all changes and errors in approved GE ECCS evaluation methods and providing that information to the NRC and to licensees on an annual basis. The NRC staff has informed GE that each licensee must file its own annual report for each licensed plant. Therefore, this letter provides the latest information involving Limerick Generating Station (LGS) Units 1 and 2 in accordance with 10 CFR 50.46 (a)(3)(1) and (ii).
involving Limerick Generating Station (LGS) Units 1 and 2 in accordance with 10 CFR 50.46                 I (a)(3)(1) and (ii).                                                                                       ;
On May 31,1996, PECO Energy confirmed with GE that the total accumulation of peak clad temperature (PCT) changes or errors identified as being applicable to LGS, Units 1 and 2, is 45'F. After adding this value to the licensing basis PCT determined in the 1993 SAFER analyses, there is still approximately 500'F of margin to the 2200*F limit specified in 10CFR50.46. The upper bound PCT also remains below the 1600*F limit specified in the NRC acceptance of the SAFER /GESTR methodology.
On May 31,1996, PECO Energy confirmed with GE that the total accumulation of peak clad temperature (PCT) changes or errors identified as being applicable to LGS, Units 1 and 2, is 45'F. After adding this value to the licensing basis PCT determined in the 1993 SAFER analyses, there is still approximately 500'F of margin to the 2200*F limit specified in 10CFR50.46. The upper bound PCT also remains below the 1600*F limit specified in the NRC acceptance of the SAFER /GESTR methodology.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yours, G. A. Hunger, Jr.,
Very truly yours, G. A. Hunger, Jr.,
Director - Licensing                                                                       ,    ,    f cc:     H.J. Miller, Administrator, Region I, USNRC                                     f I
Director - Licensing I
b       O N. S. Perry, USNRC Senior Resident inspector, LGS R. R. Janati, PA Bureau of Radiological Protection a
f O
9612230281 961216 PDR   ADOCK 05000352 P                         PDR       -}}
cc:
H.J. Miller, Administrator, Region I, USNRC f
b N. S. Perry, USNRC Senior Resident inspector, LGS R. R. Janati, PA Bureau of Radiological Protection a
9612230281 961216 PDR ADOCK 05000352 P
PDR
-}}

Latest revision as of 09:48, 12 December 2024

Provides Latest Info Involving Units 1 & 2 in Accordance w/10CFR50.46(a)(3)(i) & (II)
ML20132E423
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  
Issue date: 12/16/1996
From: Hunger G
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9612230281
Download: ML20132E423 (1)


Text

Ct-tion Support Department e

-. t, g

10 CFR 50.46 PECO NUCLEAR nco%c-A Unit of PECO Energy fyf$$[$$ #

December 16,1996 Docket Nos. 50-352 50-353 License Nos. NPF-39 NPF-85 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Cnntrol Desk Washingtort DC 20555

Subject:

Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 10CFR50.46 Reporting Requirements Gentlemen:

General Electric Company (GE) recently had discussions with the NRC staff regarding reporting of changes and errors in approved ECCS evaluation models as required by 10CFR50.46(a)(3)(l) and (ii), and has informed us about these issues via GE letter to PECO Energy dated November 9,1996. Since the 1988 revision to 10 CFR 50.46, GE has been compiling all changes and errors in approved GE ECCS evaluation methods and providing that information to the NRC and to licensees on an annual basis. The NRC staff has informed GE that each licensee must file its own annual report for each licensed plant. Therefore, this letter provides the latest information involving Limerick Generating Station (LGS) Units 1 and 2 in accordance with 10 CFR 50.46 (a)(3)(1) and (ii).

On May 31,1996, PECO Energy confirmed with GE that the total accumulation of peak clad temperature (PCT) changes or errors identified as being applicable to LGS, Units 1 and 2, is 45'F. After adding this value to the licensing basis PCT determined in the 1993 SAFER analyses, there is still approximately 500'F of margin to the 2200*F limit specified in 10CFR50.46. The upper bound PCT also remains below the 1600*F limit specified in the NRC acceptance of the SAFER /GESTR methodology.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Very truly yours, G. A. Hunger, Jr.,

Director - Licensing I

f O

cc:

H.J. Miller, Administrator, Region I, USNRC f

b N. S. Perry, USNRC Senior Resident inspector, LGS R. R. Janati, PA Bureau of Radiological Protection a

9612230281 961216 PDR ADOCK 05000352 P

PDR

-