ML20149F072: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.       .    . _..      _ _ . - _ . _ _ .                  . _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ . . _ . ___                              _ _ _ _ _        __
{{#Wiki_filter:.
i
i July 15, 1997-i 4
            ,                                                                                            July 15, 1997-                                     i 4     s         MEMORANDUM TO: James Lieberman, Director                                                                                                     !
s MEMORANDUM TO: James Lieberman, Director Office of.Enfo: cement Roy A. Zimmerman Of0M FROM:
.                                            Office of.Enfo: cement FROM:                        Roy A. Zimmerman Of0M Associate Director for Projects l
l Associate Director for Projects
)


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
)
EXPERIENCE WITH THE REVISED ENFORCEMENT POLICY (Yellow Ticket 0970079) e i
EXPERIENCE WITH THE REVISED ENFORCEMENT POLICY (Yellow Ticket 0970079) e i
I am responding to your memorandum of May 21, 1997,'on the above subject.
I am responding to your memorandum of May 21, 1997,'on the above subject.
l               Overall, the enforcement policy is considered to be working well. A few specific comments were identified and are noted bel,w.
l Overall, the enforcement policy is considered to be working well. A few specific comments were identified and are noted bel,w.
: 1.       The most comprehensive review of the enforcement program was the task force report " Assessment of the NRC Enforcement Program"
1.
;                          dated April 5, 1995. The overall assessment- is still valid.
The most comprehensive review of the enforcement program was the task force report " Assessment of the NRC Enforcement Program" dated April 5, 1995. The overall assessment-is still valid.
: 2.       The weekly enforcement boards are very effective. NRR sees them as greatly enhancing the consistency among regions and NRR on enforcement issues, j               In addition to the issues brought up in your memo, NRR recognizes the i
2.
challenges facing the agency in the areas of 50.59 changes and FSAR/ design basis documentation. We will continue to assist OE i~n these areas and with
The weekly enforcement boards are very effective. NRR sees them as greatly enhancing the consistency among regions and NRR on enforcement
: issues, j
In addition to the issues brought up in your memo, NRR recognizes the challenges facing the agency in the areas of 50.59 changes and FSAR/ design i'
basis documentation. We will continue to assist OE i~n these areas and with
.[
.[
any associated enforcement actions.
any associated enforcement actions.
i                                                                                                                                                             !
i 4
4                                                                                                                                                            1 DISTRIBUTION:
DISTRIBUTION:
!                Central File (w/ original incoming)
Central File (w/ original incoming)
;                PUBLIC (w/ incoming)
PUBLIC (w/ incoming)
;                DRPE Reading (w/ incoming)
DRPE Reading (w/ incoming)
S. Collins /F. Miraglia T. Martin M. Slosson j               W. Travers j~
S. Collins /F. Miraglia T. Martin M. Slosson j
R. Zimmerman E. Adensam                                                                                                                                   ;
W. Travers j
j                J. Zwolinski                                                                                                                                 d i
R. Zimmerman
M. Thadani                                                                                                                                   <
~
M. Boyle (e-mail)
E. Adensam j
NRR fiall Room (YT#0970079) w/ incoming) (012/G/18 N. Olson, 12 G 18 h                  g
J. Zwolinski d
                                                                                                                                .dwky)
i M. Thadani M. Boyle (e-mail)
C. Norsworthy (YT#0970079) g        3 7f C. Hehl, Region 1 J. Johnson, Region II                                                                                                                   /
NRR fiall Room (YT#0970079) w/ incoming) (012/G/18 h
G. Grant, Region III.                                                                                                               /
g N. Olson, 12 G 18
T. Gwynn, Region IV                                                                                                                       3' DOCUMENT NAME: 0970079.YEL                     *See previous concurrence To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box:                                               "C" - Copy without attachment / enclosure               "E" - Copy with attachment / enclosure                                 "N" - No copy DFFICE   DRPE:PM                 lC DRPE D                       lC DRPW:D                           lC ADP4$j, ( ) ,J N l C                 l NAME     RClark*                         Sverga*                             JRoe*                       RZissnerman () N" DATE     07/ /97                         07/ /97                             07/ /97                     07/1f797                 07/ /97 0FFICIAL RECORD a e70 maa m oo32      ,7o71, Illlillilil! Bill!apli                           9 M/           uggh PDR       ORO     NRRA PDR           ,                                                                                                j
.dwky) 37f g
C. Norsworthy (YT#0970079)
C. Hehl, Region 1
/
J. Johnson, Region II
/
G. Grant, Region III.
T. Gwynn, Region IV 3'
DOCUMENT NAME: 0970079.YEL
*See previous concurrence To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box:
"C" - Copy without attachment / enclosure "E" - Copy with attachment / enclosure "N" - No copy DFFICE DRPE:PM lC DRPE D lC DRPW:D lC ADP4$j, ( ),J N l C l
NAME RClark*
Sverga*
JRoe*
RZissnerman () N" DATE 07/ /97 07/ /97 07/ /97 07/1f797 07/ /97 0FFICIAL RECORD a maa Illlillilil! Bill!apli 9 M/
uggh e70 m oo32,7o71, PDR ORO NRRA PDR j


        .-      f*o %%,7                                                                                   \
f*o %%,7
g             >i                         UNITED STATES g             j             NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
\\
o            g                      WASHINGTON, D.C. 20666 4 001                           l
g
                %,....y                                       July 15, 1997                               \
>i UNITED STATES g
MEMORANDUM T0: James Lieberman, Director Office of Enforcement O           C ^ :nwsv)
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
Roy P. Zimmerman              /
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20666 4 001 l
o
%,....y
\\
July 15, 1997 MEMORANDUM T0: James Lieberman, Director Office of Enforcement O
C ^ :nwsv)
FROM:
FROM:
Associate Director < cI  Proj
Roy P. Zimmerman
/
< I Proj Associate Director c


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
EXPERIENCE WITH TH REVISED ENFORCEMENT POLICY (Yellow Ticket 0970079)
EXPERIENCE WITH TH REVISED ENFORCEMENT POLICY (Yellow Ticket 0970079)
I am responding to your memorandum of May 21, 1997, on the above subject.
I am responding to your memorandum of May 21, 1997, on the above subject.
Overall, the enforcement policy is considered to be working well. A few l
Overall, the enforcement policy is considered to be working well. A few specific comments were identified and are noted below.
specific comments were identified and are noted below.                                 !
1.
: 1. The most comprehensive review of the enforcement program was the task force report " Assessment of the NRC Enforcement Program" dated April 5, 1995. The overall assessment is still valid.
The most comprehensive review of the enforcement program was the task force report " Assessment of the NRC Enforcement Program" dated April 5, 1995. The overall assessment is still valid.
: 2. The weekly enforcement bor.rds are very effective. NRR sees them as greatly enhancing the consistency among regions and NRR on enforcement issues.
2.
In addition to the issues brought up in your memo, NRR recognizes the                   i challenges facing the agency in the areas of 50.59 changes and FSAR/ design basis documentation. We will continue to assist OE in these areas and with any associated enforcement actions.
The weekly enforcement bor.rds are very effective.
NRR sees them as greatly enhancing the consistency among regions and NRR on enforcement issues.
In addition to the issues brought up in your memo, NRR recognizes the i
challenges facing the agency in the areas of 50.59 changes and FSAR/ design basis documentation. We will continue to assist OE in these areas and with any associated enforcement actions.
t 4
t 4
i I
i
                                                                                                          )
)


      ' +
' +
l 6'
l 6'
I i-                                                                                                                                                                     !
I i-p FROM:
p FROM:                                                   ORIGINAL DUE DT: 06/23/97                                         TICKET.NO: 0970079                         i DOC'DT: 05/21/97
ORIGINAL DUE DT: 06/23/97 TICKET.NO: 0970079 i
* NRR RCVD DATE: 05/22/97                       ,
DOC'DT: 05/21/97 NRR RCVD DATE: 05/22/97
! J.-LIEBERMAN, OE
! J.-LIEBERMAN, OE
; TO:                                                                                                                                                                 .
; TO:
                ~ MULTIPLE ~ ADDRESSEES-                                                                                                                             ,
~ MULTIPLE ~ ADDRESSEES-FOR SIGNATURE OF :
FOR SIGNATURE OF :                                                         ** YEL             **                                                              -
** YEL
:l DESC:                                                                                                                   ROUTING:
:l DESC:
t EXPERIENCE'WITH THE REVISED ENFORCEMENT POLICY                                                                         COLLINS MIRAGLIA MARTIN SLOSSON TRAVERS BOHRER
ROUTING:
    -ASSIGNED TO:                                       CONTACT:
t EXPERIENCE'WITH THE REVISED ENFORCEMENT POLICY COLLINS MIRAGLIA MARTIN SLOSSON TRAVERS BOHRER
ADPR                               ZT1@tERMAN t RO16 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS:
-ASSIGNED TO:
V9 l
CONTACT:
1 1
ADPR ZT1@tERMAN t RO16 V9 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS:
ACTIO_N DUE TO NRR DIRECTOR'S OFFICE !
1 ACTIO_N DUE TO NRR DIRECTOR'S OFFICE j
G           ,,an-LF j'*.d7ftgy-=-
G
  !-                                                                                                                                                                    4 i
,,an-LF j'*.d7ftgy-=-
              ,                                                                              ,            _ . . .      .    .}}
4 i
--}}

Latest revision as of 10:54, 11 December 2024

Provides Comments on Revised Enforcement Policy,Per 970521 Request
ML20149F072
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/15/1997
From: Zimmerman R
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Lieberman J
NRC OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT (OE)
Shared Package
ML20149F076 List:
References
NUDOCS 9707220032
Download: ML20149F072 (3)


Text

.

i July 15, 1997-i 4

s MEMORANDUM TO: James Lieberman, Director Office of.Enfo: cement Roy A. Zimmerman Of0M FROM:

l Associate Director for Projects

)

SUBJECT:

EXPERIENCE WITH THE REVISED ENFORCEMENT POLICY (Yellow Ticket 0970079) e i

I am responding to your memorandum of May 21, 1997,'on the above subject.

l Overall, the enforcement policy is considered to be working well. A few specific comments were identified and are noted bel,w.

1.

The most comprehensive review of the enforcement program was the task force report " Assessment of the NRC Enforcement Program" dated April 5, 1995. The overall assessment-is still valid.

2.

The weekly enforcement boards are very effective. NRR sees them as greatly enhancing the consistency among regions and NRR on enforcement

issues, j

In addition to the issues brought up in your memo, NRR recognizes the challenges facing the agency in the areas of 50.59 changes and FSAR/ design i'

basis documentation. We will continue to assist OE i~n these areas and with

.[

any associated enforcement actions.

i 4

DISTRIBUTION:

Central File (w/ original incoming)

PUBLIC (w/ incoming)

DRPE Reading (w/ incoming)

S. Collins /F. Miraglia T. Martin M. Slosson j

W. Travers j

R. Zimmerman

~

E. Adensam j

J. Zwolinski d

i M. Thadani M. Boyle (e-mail)

NRR fiall Room (YT#0970079) w/ incoming) (012/G/18 h

g N. Olson, 12 G 18

.dwky) 37f g

C. Norsworthy (YT#0970079)

C. Hehl, Region 1

/

J. Johnson, Region II

/

G. Grant, Region III.

T. Gwynn, Region IV 3'

DOCUMENT NAME: 0970079.YEL

  • See previous concurrence To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box:

"C" - Copy without attachment / enclosure "E" - Copy with attachment / enclosure "N" - No copy DFFICE DRPE:PM lC DRPE D lC DRPW:D lC ADP4$j, ( ),J N l C l

NAME RClark*

Sverga*

JRoe*

RZissnerman () N" DATE 07/ /97 07/ /97 07/ /97 07/1f797 07/ /97 0FFICIAL RECORD a maa Illlillilil! Bill!apli 9 M/

uggh e70 m oo32,7o71, PDR ORO NRRA PDR j

f*o %%,7

\\

g

>i UNITED STATES g

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20666 4 001 l

o

%,....y

\\

July 15, 1997 MEMORANDUM T0: James Lieberman, Director Office of Enforcement O

C ^ :nwsv)

FROM:

Roy P. Zimmerman

/

< I Proj Associate Director c

SUBJECT:

EXPERIENCE WITH TH REVISED ENFORCEMENT POLICY (Yellow Ticket 0970079)

I am responding to your memorandum of May 21, 1997, on the above subject.

Overall, the enforcement policy is considered to be working well. A few specific comments were identified and are noted below.

1.

The most comprehensive review of the enforcement program was the task force report " Assessment of the NRC Enforcement Program" dated April 5, 1995. The overall assessment is still valid.

2.

The weekly enforcement bor.rds are very effective.

NRR sees them as greatly enhancing the consistency among regions and NRR on enforcement issues.

In addition to the issues brought up in your memo, NRR recognizes the i

challenges facing the agency in the areas of 50.59 changes and FSAR/ design basis documentation. We will continue to assist OE in these areas and with any associated enforcement actions.

t 4

i

)

' +

l 6'

I i-p FROM:

ORIGINAL DUE DT: 06/23/97 TICKET.NO: 0970079 i

DOC'DT: 05/21/97 NRR RCVD DATE: 05/22/97

! J.-LIEBERMAN, OE

TO

~ MULTIPLE ~ ADDRESSEES-FOR SIGNATURE OF :

    • YEL
l DESC:

ROUTING:

t EXPERIENCE'WITH THE REVISED ENFORCEMENT POLICY COLLINS MIRAGLIA MARTIN SLOSSON TRAVERS BOHRER

-ASSIGNED TO:

CONTACT:

ADPR ZT1@tERMAN t RO16 V9 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS:

1 ACTIO_N DUE TO NRR DIRECTOR'S OFFICE j

G

,,an-LF j'*.d7ftgy-=-

4 i

--