ML20206N048: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:n-- | ||
KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART... | m-( fjti$ | ||
KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART..." | |||
*x.m tem. m noon mow.=== | |||
wAnaseros, o.c. mm.m .2 my 30 P 3 :01 =.m nw 14M matamLA AYWAR | wAnaseros, o.c. mm.m.2 my 30 P 3 :01 =.m nw m mm. v.w. | ||
= | |||
gggg g g T uaoa,ma con n m a | 14M matamLA AYWAR MM4. PL 1101 frJpwise een ??64006 pen pmtt TusX 4eetsf EL DC L' gggg g g T uaoa,ma con n m a mwanau#4tuu.im LA1MNCE COE LM.7HER ma men | ||
"* "5"" | |||
November 30, 1988 | November 30, 1988 l | ||
VIA TELECOPY Christine N. r,hl, Chairperson Alan S. Rosent ni Howard A. Wilber Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. | |||
20555 Rat Docket Nos. 50-322-OL-3 and 6 | |||
==Dear Madam chairperson and Members of the Board:== | ==Dear Madam chairperson and Members of the Board:== | ||
In accord nce with this morning's oral request from the Appeal Boi-d, the underJigned provides views on the NRC Staff Motior. ft. | |||
In accord nce with this morning's oral request from the Appeal Boi-d, the underJigned provides views on the NRC Staff Motior. ft. | .econsideration of Appeal Board Order of November 28, 1988 ant. f. Enlargement of Response Tire, dated Novembcr 29, j | ||
1988. | |||
Although Juffolk county does not agree with each of the bases asserted by the Staff in its Motion, the county, with one caveat, does not object to the grant of the Staff's Motion. That caveat is that if unforeseen circumstances should arise which necess).tata action on the Governments' Stay Motion prior to November 8, 1988, that the Board proceed to a decision on that motion without waiting for the staff's filings. | Although Juffolk county does not agree with each of the bases asserted by the Staff in its Motion, the county, with one caveat, does not object to the grant of the Staff's Motion. | ||
l | That caveat is that if unforeseen circumstances should arise which necess).tata action on the Governments' Stay Motion prior to November 8, 1988, that the Board proceed to a decision on that motion without waiting for the staff's filings. | ||
l Counsel for Su.' folk County 4.s autnorized to represent that the State of New York and the Town of Southampton concur in the l | |||
i | foragoing views, i | ||
i Sincerelv, 0012O20160 C W | |||
p PDn ADOt% F- | |||
R a . .3 | ,7 h | ||
I | g Lawrsnce"o[eLanphe C | ||
ec. | |||
Donald P. I6 o | |||
Edwin J. | |||
Re... | |||
'.lilli r R. Custming, i | |||
R a..3 | |||
'. 'c,ahnleu ts::. Esq. | |||
I St' d | |||
Latham, Esq. | |||
Do # ":ing and Service Section 3}} | Do # ":ing and Service Section 3}} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:18, 7 December 2024
| ML20206N048 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1988 |
| From: | Lanpher L NEW YORK, STATE OF, SOUTHAMPTON, NY, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY |
| To: | Kohl C, Rosenthal A, Wilber H NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| References | |
| CON-#488-7584 OL-3, OL-6, NUDOCS 8812020168 | |
| Download: ML20206N048 (1) | |
Text
n--
m-( fjti$
KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART..."
- x.m tem. m noon mow.===
wAnaseros, o.c. mm.m.2 my 30 P 3 :01 =.m nw m mm. v.w.
=
14M matamLA AYWAR MM4. PL 1101 frJpwise een ??64006 pen pmtt TusX 4eetsf EL DC L' gggg g g T uaoa,ma con n m a mwanau#4tuu.im LA1MNCE COE LM.7HER ma men
"* "5""
November 30, 1988 l
VIA TELECOPY Christine N. r,hl, Chairperson Alan S. Rosent ni Howard A. Wilber Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Rat Docket Nos. 50-322-OL-3 and 6
Dear Madam chairperson and Members of the Board:
In accord nce with this morning's oral request from the Appeal Boi-d, the underJigned provides views on the NRC Staff Motior. ft.
.econsideration of Appeal Board Order of November 28, 1988 ant. f. Enlargement of Response Tire, dated Novembcr 29, j
1988.
Although Juffolk county does not agree with each of the bases asserted by the Staff in its Motion, the county, with one caveat, does not object to the grant of the Staff's Motion.
That caveat is that if unforeseen circumstances should arise which necess).tata action on the Governments' Stay Motion prior to November 8, 1988, that the Board proceed to a decision on that motion without waiting for the staff's filings.
l Counsel for Su.' folk County 4.s autnorized to represent that the State of New York and the Town of Southampton concur in the l
foragoing views, i
i Sincerelv, 0012O20160 C W
p PDn ADOt% F-
,7 h
g Lawrsnce"o[eLanphe C
ec.
Donald P. I6 o
Edwin J.
Re...
'.lilli r R. Custming, i
R a..3
'. 'c,ahnleu ts::. Esq.
I St' d
Latham, Esq.
Do # ":ing and Service Section 3