ML20213E589: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
{{#Wiki_filter:_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
                                                    ~,                                                                           y DisTpinuTimi-SEP       1 1983
~,
                                                                ..                        RAul uck
y SEP 1 1983 DisTpinuTimi-RAul uck
          !!El10RANDUM FOR:                             Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing THRU:                                       Th omas H. Novak, Assistant Director
!!El10RANDUM FOR:
                                                        ~ for Licensing Division of Licensing A. Schwencer, Chief Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing FROM:                                       Raj Auluck, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing
Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing THRU:
Th omas H. Novak, Assistant Director
~ for Licensing Division of Licensing A. Schwencer, Chief Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing FROM:
Raj Auluck, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
NRR INPUT TO SALP - WNP-2 Ue have completed the NRR input for the SALP for Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS), Project No. 2.                                   A copy of the SALP report is attached.
NRR INPUT TO SALP - WNP-2 Ue have completed the NRR input for the SALP for Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS), Project No. 2.
An overall rating of Category 2 is given to UPPSS with regard to their Project No. 2.                     This was based upon input solicited from selected staff personnel who have had substantial contact and involvement with UNP-2's licensing activities.
A copy of the SALP report is attached.
An overall rating of Category 2 is given to UPPSS with regard to their Project No. 2.
This was based upon input solicited from selected staff personnel who have had substantial contact and involvement with UNP-2's licensing activities.
The draft was also reviewed by the NRR Division Directors.
The draft was also reviewed by the NRR Division Directors.
OrQinal ci2r.ed by:
OrQinal ci2r.ed by:
Line 31: Line 36:


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
SALP report cc:
D. M. Sternberg R. T. Dodds N
3[k' 8309120251 830901 p ADOCK 05000397 "UP' N-n DL:LBg/R4' DL 27BC UL: U/^ '
omen suan*w q(~ 4.1%c k..:.pt..
.. A5 c h enc er.
.d.
k.
om dB/31./.83...8hg/83..
$Il.83..
\\
OFFICIAL RECORD CC?Y
= r: e.
a n
.nc rosu my :n..acu ma J


SALP report cc:    D. M. Sternberg R. T. Dodds N
~
8309120251 830901 p ADOCK 05000397 3[k' "UP' N-                                        n omen DL:LBg/R4' DL      27BC UL: U/^ '
SYSTEMATIC ASSE55P.ECT OF L3 CENSE'E PEP.F03 MAN'.E i
suan*w q(~ 4.1%c k..:.pt..                        .. A5 c h enc er . .d. k.        ,      ,    ,    ,,    ,        , ,, , , ,
FACILITY: Washington Public Power Supply System Nuclear Project No. 2 LICENSEE: Washington Public Power Supply System i
om dB/31./.83.. .8hg/83..                                      $Il.83..  . ;.                      ,          ,            , ,,
APPRAISAL PERIOD:
  .nc rosu my :n ..acu ma                                    \
August 1,1932 through July 31,1933; Cycle 4 F'JNCTIO"AL AREA:
OFFICIAL RECORD CC?Y                            = r: e.      a n J
Licensing Activities PP.CJECT R;*;AGER:
 
F.sjender Auluck Analysis During this appraisal period, the staff was involved, along with the applicant, in resolvir g the open items related to the issuance of operating license for W"P-2.
                                          ~
During this period three supple:ents to the WNF-2 Safety Analysis Fsport were issued.
SYSTEMATIC ASSE55P.ECT OF L3 CENSE'E PEP.F03 MAN'.E i                 FACILITY: Washington Public Power Supply System Nuclear Project No. 2 LICENSEE: Washington Public Power Supply System i
Adviscry Cer i;:ee cn Reactor Safeguard's (ACRS) sub-cc mittee teeting was held in Septe bar 1982 and the full committee met in 0:tober 1932.
APPRAISAL PERIOD:       August 1,1932 through July 31,1933; Cycle 4
Washington Public Power Supply System (ilFPSS) has demonstrated a high degree of management control and involverei.t in achieving resolution of licensing issues.
,                    F'JNCTIO"AL AREA:     Licensing Activities
Management involvcment was particularly evident in addressing the NRC concerns in the emergency planning program and the i
;                  PP.CJECT R;*;AGER:   F.sjender Auluck Analysis During this appraisal period, the staff was involved, along with the applicant, in resolvir g the open items related to the issuance of operating license for W"P-2. During this period three supple:ents to the WNF-2 Safety Analysis Fsport were issued. Adviscry Cer i;:ee cn Reactor Safeguard's (ACRS) sub-cc mittee teeting was held in Septe bar
recuirements for the emergency response capability.
  ,              1982 and the full committee met in 0:tober 1932.
Washington Public Power Supply System (ilFPSS) has demonstrated a high                                                                         '
;              degree of management control and involverei.t in achieving resolution                                                                             -            ,
of licensing issues. Management involvcment was particularly evident in addressing the NRC concerns in the emergency planning program and the                                                                                     i recuirements for the emergency response capability.
The apprcach of the licensee to the resolution of technical issues from a.
The apprcach of the licensee to the resolution of technical issues from a.
;            cafety standpcint is te:hnically stund ir alcest all cases.                                                     This .ca s
cafety standpcint is te:hnically stund ir alcest all cases.
* 4 particularly evident in the auxiliary systems crea where the liccnsee                                                                                         !
This.ca s 4
justified the deviation in resolving the issue of "Tornad,o-missile protection 4
particularly evident in the auxiliary systems crea where the liccnsee justified the deviation in resolving the issue of "Tornad,o-missile protection for diesel generator exhaust."
for diesel generator exhaust."
4 I
I In response to NRC initiatives, the licensee provided timely respohses with acceptable resolutions. Delays were experienced in few casas.
In response to NRC initiatives, the licensee provided timely respohses with acceptable resolutions.
            ' Personnel in the key positions of licensing activities are knowledgcable l             and professional. During the meetings with the NRC, the applicant has-provided the appropriate technical and management level personnel to                                                                       ,
Delays were experienced in few casas.
cake the'cettings productive.                                   -
' Personnel in the key positions of licensing activities are knowledgcable l
and professional.
During the meetings with the NRC, the applicant has-provided the appropriate technical and management level personnel to cake the'cettings productive.
i' I
i' I
Conclusiens Based on the evaluation for a number of significant licensing activities,                                                                                       i an overall rating of Category 2 is given to Washington Public Power Supply i
Conclusiens Based on the evaluation for a number of significant licensing activities, i
System with regard to their proje:t No. 2. The lice see has been                                                                                             5:
an overall rating of Category 2 is given to Washington Public Power Supply System with regard to their proje:t No. 2.
characterized as being knowledgeable, cocperative,, technical competent i
The lice see has been 5:
and responsive in the area of licensing activities.                                                                                                             '
i characterized as being knowledgeable, cocperative,, technical competent and responsive in the area of licensing activities.
ss                                                          .
i s
I
s I
* 1 1
1 1
lC
lC p--
                                              , , , , , , , , - , ,            - p-- - -  um.-p 7.n -,,+r,.,- --        .                              -        - - --}}
um.-p 7.n
-,,+r,.,-
- - --}}

Latest revision as of 03:20, 4 December 2024

Forwards NRR Input to SALP for Aug 1982 - Jul 1983.Overall Rating of Category 2 Assigned
ML20213E589
Person / Time
Site: Columbia 
Issue date: 09/01/1983
From: Rajender Auluck
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CON-WNP-0648, CON-WNP-648 NUDOCS 8309120251
Download: ML20213E589 (2)


Text

_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

~,

y SEP 1 1983 DisTpinuTimi-RAul uck

!!El10RANDUM FOR:

Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing THRU:

Th omas H. Novak, Assistant Director

~ for Licensing Division of Licensing A. Schwencer, Chief Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing FROM:

Raj Auluck, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing

SUBJECT:

NRR INPUT TO SALP - WNP-2 Ue have completed the NRR input for the SALP for Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS), Project No. 2.

A copy of the SALP report is attached.

An overall rating of Category 2 is given to UPPSS with regard to their Project No. 2.

This was based upon input solicited from selected staff personnel who have had substantial contact and involvement with UNP-2's licensing activities.

The draft was also reviewed by the NRR Division Directors.

OrQinal ci2r.ed by:

Raj Auluck, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing

Attachment:

SALP report cc:

D. M. Sternberg R. T. Dodds N

3[k' 8309120251 830901 p ADOCK 05000397 "UP' N-n DL:LBg/R4' DL 27BC UL: U/^ '

omen suan*w q(~ 4.1%c k..:.pt..

.. A5 c h enc er.

.d.

k.

om dB/31./.83...8hg/83..

$Il.83..

\\

OFFICIAL RECORD CC?Y

= r: e.

a n

.nc rosu my :n..acu ma J

~

SYSTEMATIC ASSE55P.ECT OF L3 CENSE'E PEP.F03 MAN'.E i

FACILITY: Washington Public Power Supply System Nuclear Project No. 2 LICENSEE: Washington Public Power Supply System i

APPRAISAL PERIOD:

August 1,1932 through July 31,1933; Cycle 4 F'JNCTIO"AL AREA:

Licensing Activities PP.CJECT R;*;AGER:

F.sjender Auluck Analysis During this appraisal period, the staff was involved, along with the applicant, in resolvir g the open items related to the issuance of operating license for W"P-2.

During this period three supple:ents to the WNF-2 Safety Analysis Fsport were issued.

Adviscry Cer i;:ee cn Reactor Safeguard's (ACRS) sub-cc mittee teeting was held in Septe bar 1982 and the full committee met in 0:tober 1932.

Washington Public Power Supply System (ilFPSS) has demonstrated a high degree of management control and involverei.t in achieving resolution of licensing issues.

Management involvcment was particularly evident in addressing the NRC concerns in the emergency planning program and the i

recuirements for the emergency response capability.

The apprcach of the licensee to the resolution of technical issues from a.

cafety standpcint is te:hnically stund ir alcest all cases.

This.ca s 4

particularly evident in the auxiliary systems crea where the liccnsee justified the deviation in resolving the issue of "Tornad,o-missile protection for diesel generator exhaust."

4 I

In response to NRC initiatives, the licensee provided timely respohses with acceptable resolutions.

Delays were experienced in few casas.

' Personnel in the key positions of licensing activities are knowledgcable l

and professional.

During the meetings with the NRC, the applicant has-provided the appropriate technical and management level personnel to cake the'cettings productive.

i' I

Conclusiens Based on the evaluation for a number of significant licensing activities, i

an overall rating of Category 2 is given to Washington Public Power Supply System with regard to their proje:t No. 2.

The lice see has been 5:

i characterized as being knowledgeable, cocperative,, technical competent and responsive in the area of licensing activities.

i s

s I

1 1

lC p--

um.-p 7.n

-,,+r,.,-

- - --