ML20213H052: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:*
{{#Wiki_filter:i[gno o
i[gno       o                                 UNITED STATES
UNITED STATES 7
  ,        !**        7  n                NUC:. . ' ?. ?.:C"L/d ORY COMMISSION 4'
NUC:.. ' ?. ?.:C"L/d ORY COMMISSION n
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 k ... . . p#                                           May 12, 1987 DOCKET NO. 50-601 MEMORANDUM FOR: Distribution (SeeAttached)
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 4'
THRU:               Herbert N. Berkow, Director Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, Y and Special Projects FROM:               Thomas J. Kenyon, Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Directorate Division rf Reactor Projects III, IV, V arid Special Projects
k..... p#
May 12, 1987 DOCKET NO. 50-601 MEMORANDUM FOR: Distribution (SeeAttached)
THRU:
Herbert N. Berkow, Director Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, Y and Special Projects FROM:
Thomas J. Kenyon, Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Directorate Division rf Reactor Projects III, IV, V arid Special Projects


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
RE0 VEST FOR ASSIGNMENT OF TECHNICAL REVIEWERS TO THE RESAR SP-90 APPLICATION The purpose of this memo is to request you previde me with the name(s) of the technical reviewer (s) who will be assi the review of the WAPWR (RESAR SP/90)                   gned the application. Toresponsibility assist you inofyour completion of selection of these reviewers, I am forwarding the following information:
RE0 VEST FOR ASSIGNMENT OF TECHNICAL REVIEWERS TO THE RESAR SP-90 APPLICATION The purpose of this memo is to request you previde me with the name(s) of the technical reviewer (s) who will be assi the review of the WAPWR (RESAR SP/90) gned the responsibility of completion of application. To assist you in your selection of these reviewers, I am forwarding the following information:
: 1. Enclosure 1 provides a brief history and status of the project.
: 1. provides a brief history and status of the project.
: 2. Enclosure 2 provides a tentative review schedule which would result in issuance of a draft SER in April 1988, and the final SER by the end of 1988.
: 2. provides a tentative review schedule which would result in issuance of a draft SER in April 1988, and the final SER by the end of 1988.
: 3. Enclosure 3 provides a listing of the SERs issued to date, the                           l former reviewers (if known), and the PSAR modules in which the SER sections are discussed. I have attempted to delineate which branch would have the primary responsibility over the SER sections. The                         ,
: 3. provides a listing of the SERs issued to date, the former reviewers (if known), and the PSAR modules in which the SER sections are discussed.
delineation may be in error in some cases as no official listing of                     l SRP responsibilities under the new organization has been issued to date.
I have attempted to delineate which branch would have the primary responsibility over the SER sections. The delineation may be in error in some cases as no official listing of SRP responsibilities under the new organization has been issued to date.
As discussed during a May 7,1987 meeting with senior NRC management, PDSNP requests that, to the extent practicable, reviewers who have previously participated in the WAPWR review should be assigned to complete the review of this project. However, consideration must be given to the reviewer's ability to meet the proposed milestones for this review vs. those of other assigned projects.                                                                                               I Accordingly, I request you provide me with the name(s) of the assigned reviewer (s)                     i in your branch, concurrence (or non-concurrence) with the proposed SER assignments.                   l and concurrence with the proposed schedule or identification of any problems in                         i meeting that schedule.
As discussed during a May 7,1987 meeting with senior NRC management, PDSNP requests that, to the extent practicable, reviewers who have previously participated in the WAPWR review should be assigned to complete the review of this project. However, consideration must be given to the reviewer's ability to meet the proposed milestones for this review vs. those of other assigned projects.
0705190121 070512 PDR       ADOCK0500g1
Accordingly, I request you provide me with the name(s) of the assigned reviewer (s) in your branch, concurrence (or non-concurrence) with the proposed SER assignments.
                                              -    . ___            -                -- . _ - -              - -1
and concurrence with the proposed schedule or identification of any problems in meeting that schedule.
0705190121 070512 ADOCK0500g1 PDR
- 1


May 12, 1987               . ~; <
May 12, 1987
                                                                                                                                              \
. ~;
\\
2-Copies of the updated PSAR modules and the SERs can be ootained froc..te in Rooi.. P-908A. The Docket No. and PA No. are 50-601 and 141213, respectively.
2-Copies of the updated PSAR modules and the SERs can be ootained froc..te in Rooi.. P-908A. The Docket No. and PA No. are 50-601 and 141213, respectively.
My extension is X27064, ori Thomas J.ginal     signed       by Manager Kenyon,         Project Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate                   '
My extension is X27064, Thomas J.ginal signed by ori Kenyon, Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, V and Special Projects
Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, V and Special Projects


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
 
As stated cc:
As stated cc:       T. Murley F. Miraglia R. Starostecki D. Crutchfield L. Shao 4                         J. Richardson i
T. Murley F. Miraglia R. Starostecki D. Crutchfield L. Shao 4
A. Thadant                                                                                                           s J. Partlow F. Congel
J. Richardson i
  ,                        H. Miller                                                                                                                 '
A. Thadant s
D. Ross i
J. Partlow F. Congel H. Miller D. Ross DISTRIBUTION:
DISTRIBUTION:
i ipockettfiej NRC & Local PDR PDSNP Reading Ellylton TKenyon HBerkow OGC-BETH EJordan l
ipockettfiej NRC & Local PDR PDSNP Reading Ellylton TKenyon HBerkow OGC-BETH EJordan l               ACRS (10)
ACRS (10)
!              PDSN                         PDJW                   PDSNP M 6 E$ltoli                     TKeh         :cw           HBeM.o'w 05////87                     05/j       87             05/sf/87 i
PDSN PDJW PDSNP M 6 E$ltoli TKeh
                                                                                                                                            /
:cw HBeM.o'w 05////87 05/j 87 05/sf/87 i
/
1
1
                  , . , - -      , . - - - -    , ,-,-,r,     w.--, a ,- , - ,     ,, .  -c-     --- . -      n
,-,-,r, w.--,
a,-, -,
-c-n


'Y(             ..
'Y(
                                                                              \
\\
Copies of the updated PSAR modules and the SERs can be obtained from me in s        Room P-908A. The Docket No. and PA No. are 50-601 and 141213, respectively.
Copies of the updated PSAR modules and the SERs can be obtained from me in Room P-908A. The Docket No. and PA No. are 50-601 and 141213, respectively.
My extension is X27064.
s My extension is X27064.
              -l A-      *
-l
              ?
?
i                                                                     l Th     J. Kenyo , Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, V and Special Projects
A-l i
Th J. Kenyo, Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, V and Special Projects


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
As stated cc:
T. Murley F. Miraglia R. Starostecki D. Crutchfield L. Shao J. Richardson A. Thadani J. Partlow F. Congel H. Miller D. Ross


As stated cc:   T. Murley F. Miraglia R. Starostecki D. Crutchfield L. Shao J. Richardson A. Thadani J. Partlow F. Congel H. Miller D. Ross
DISTRIBUTION:
 
C. Y. Cheng, Acting Chief Materials Engineering Branch T. Marsh, Chief Mechanical Engineering Branch G. Bagchi, Acting Chief Structural & Geosciences Branch C. McCracken, Acting Chief Chemical Engineering Branch J. Mauk, Acting Chief Instrumentation & Control Systems Branch F. Rosa, Chief Electrical Systems Branch J. Craig, Acting Chief Plant Systems Branch M. W. Hodges, Chief Reactor Systems Branch R. Erickson, Chief Sateguards Branch L. J. Cunningham, Acting Chief Radiation Protection Eranch A. Beach, Acting Chief Quality Assurance Branch
DISTRIBUTION:    C. Y. Cheng, Acting Chief Materials Engineering Branch T. Marsh, Chief Mechanical Engineering Branch G. Bagchi, Acting Chief Structural & Geosciences Branch           ,
C. McCracken, Acting Chief Chemical Engineering Branch                 -
J. Mauk, Acting Chief Instrumentation & Control Systems Branch F. Rosa, Chief Electrical Systems Branch J. Craig, Acting Chief Plant Systems Branch M. W. Hodges, Chief Reactor Systems Branch R. Erickson, Chief Sateguards Branch L. J. Cunningham, Acting Chief Radiation Protection Eranch A. Beach, Acting Chief Quality Assurance Branch
~
~
W. Regan, Jr. , Chief Human Factors Assessment Branch J. Murphy, Acting Chief Risk Applications Branch
W. Regan, Jr., Chief Human Factors Assessment Branch J. Murphy, Acting Chief Risk Applications Branch
                                                  .4 t
.4 t
v t
v t


i-Enclosure 1 j                                                             RESAR SP/90 Backgrcund and Current Status
i-j RESAR SP/90 Backgrcund and Current Status


===Background===
===Background===
Westinghouse tendered the RESAR SP/90 application in October,1983, and                                                   ;
Westinghouse tendered the RESAR SP/90 application in October,1983, and the NRC determined the submittal was acceptable for docketing in January, 1984.
the NRC determined the submittal was acceptable for docketing in January, 1984.                                         '
The original concept consisted of a module-by-module staff review. Westinghouse submitted the PDA application in modular form, with each module containing i
The original concept consisted of a module-by-module staff review. Westinghouse                                         '
appropriate PSAR chapter sections to address plant features or design topics.
submitted the PDA application in modular form, with each module containing                                             i
l The staff was to review each module individually and issue an SER for each module. Westinghouse's original submittal schedule began in October, 1983 and j
!                      appropriate PSAR chapter sections to address plant features or design topics.
was to end in February,1985. Due to resource restraints within Westinghouse, r
l                       The staff was to review each module individually and issue an SER for each
the last module was not recefved until March, 1987.
;                      module. Westinghouse's original submittal schedule began in October, 1983 and j                     was to end in February,1985. Due to resource restraints within Westinghouse,                                             r
1 I
;                      the last module was not recefved until March, 1987.                                                                     ;
Status Staff review was originally schedu;ed for completion in January,1986.
1
However, no SEPs have been issued to dato for any of the modules, although son draft SER sections have been completed.
"                                                                                                                                              I Status Staff review was originally schedu;ed for completion in January,1986.
For the last year or so, except for the review of the PRA (Module 16) by BNL, very little review effort took
However, no SEPs have been issued to dato for any of the modules, although son draft SER sections have been completed. For the last year or so, except                                             :
{
;                      for the review of the PRA (Module 16) by BNL, very little review effort took                                           ;
place, due to resource restraints, lack of response by Westinghouse for l
{                     place, due to resource restraints, lack of response by Westinghouse for l
extenced periods. and lack of completeness of individual modules.
extenced periods. and lack of completeness of individual modules.
It is difficult to accurately assess the review status quantitatively 4                     because some of the earlier reviews might have to be at least partially redone
It is difficult to accurately assess the review status quantitatively 4
.                      by the current review crganizations. We estimate that the review is about 25%
because some of the earlier reviews might have to be at least partially redone by the current review crganizations. We estimate that the review is about 25%
{                     complete.
{
i                                                                                                                                             ,
complete.
!                      Proposed Action and Schedule
i Proposed Action and Schedule Since all of the modules now have been submitted by Westinghouse, and all responses to RAls have been received, PDSNP proposes to perform en integrated review rather than a modular one. This will result in a more efficient review as well as a more comprehensive SER.
!                      Since all of the modules now have been submitted by Westinghouse, and all
a As a result of the reorganization, approximately 30% of the former SP/90 review staff have been transferred to other non-related positions. PDSP l
!                      responses to RAls have been received, PDSNP proposes to perform en integrated review rather than a modular one. This will result in a more efficient review as well as a more comprehensive SER.
proposes to establish a new review team with the intent of retaining former 1
a As a result of the reorganization, approximately 30% of the former SP/90                                                 ;
reviewers to the extent practicable. SERs received to date will be distributed to the staff for reconcurrence by the new NRR management, and a review schedule for SP/90 will be established with the concurrence of the technical review branches. The review effort and schedule must, of course, be supported by Westinghouse. of this package provides a tentative review schedule. This schedule would result in the issuance of a draft SER in April,1988, and the final SER by the end of 1988.
review staff have been transferred to other non-related positions. PDSP                                                 l proposes to establish a new review team with the intent of retaining former                                             1 reviewers to the extent practicable. SERs received to date will be distributed to the staff for reconcurrence by the new NRR management, and a review
The schedule is feasible only if the appropriate level of priority is established by upper management of both the NRC and Westinghouse.
,                      schedule for SP/90 will be established with the concurrence of the technical review branches. The review effort and schedule must, of course, be supported by Westinghouse.                                                                                                         l Enclosure 2 of this package provides a tentative review schedule . This                                                   l schedule would result in the issuance of a draft SER in April,1988, and the                                               ,
i
final SER by the end of 1988. The schedule is feasible only if the appropriate                                           l level of priority is established by upper management of both the NRC and Westinghouse.
-~
l i
_          ,_._ _ , _ _      -~               ._, __                        _ . - -    . _ . __            _ _ , _


Enclosure 2 Tentative Review Schedule 1
Tentative Review Schedule RESAR SP/90 1
RESAR SP/90 1
1 1
1 Milestone                                             Date
Milestone Date
          - Establish review team a review schedule, and               5/87 distribute SERs
- Establish review team a review schedule, and 5/87 distribute SERs
          - Q-1 inputs to P.M.                                         7/87
- Q-1 inputs to P.M.
          - Q-Is sent to Westinghouse                                   8/87 l         - Westinghouse responses                                     12/f.7
7/87
          - Draft SER inputs to P.M.                                   3/88
- Q-Is sent to Westinghouse 8/87 l
          - Draft SER issued                                           4/88
- Westinghouse responses 12/f.7
          - k'estinghouse responses to draft SER                       7/88
- Draft SER inputs to P.M.
          - Final SER inputs to P.M.                                   10/88
3/88
          - Final SER issued                                           12/88 T
- Draft SER issued 4/88
                            .c       . , . . . _ _      ,_
- k'estinghouse responses to draft SER 7/88
7 ..-_.-
- Final SER inputs to P.M.
r     -r~--4             * - - ---r- --w-
10/88
- Final SER issued 12/88 T
.c 7
r
-r~--4
---r-
--w-


                                                                                                    ~
~
ENCLOSURE 3                                             . .
ENCLOSURE 3 SER SECTIONS FOR RESAR SP/90 Division /
SER SECTIONS FOR RESAR SP/90 Division /                   Former                                                     SER+
Former SER+
Branch               Reviewer Reviewer     Module                   Section             Dates DEST /EMTB                   Smith         5       4.5.1 CRD Structur61 Materials     4/12/85 Johnsen/       4       5.2.3 RC Pressure Boundary         8/19/25 Smith                   Materials                       4/12/85 Johnson       4       5.2.4 RC Pressure Boundary         8/19/85 Inservice Inspection and Testing Johnson /     4       5.3.1 Reactor Vessel Materials     8/19/85 Smfth                                                   4/12/85 Johnson       4       5.3.2 Pressure-Temperature Limits 8/19/85 Johnson       4       5.3.3 Reactor Vessel Integrity     8/19/85 Unknown       4       5.4.1.1 Reactor Coolant Pumps       N/S (Flyv Feel Integrity)         '
Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /EMTB Smith 5
Johnson /     4       5.4.2.1 Steam Generator Materials   8/19/85-Smith                                                     4/12/85 Smith         1, 10   6.1.1 Metallic Materials           4/12/85 7/15/85 Unknown       TBD     6.2.7 fracture Prevention of         N/S Contairment Pressure Boundary Unknown       TBD     6.6 Inservice Inspection of         N/S Class 2 and 3 components Unknown       658       10.2.3 Turbine Disk Integrity       N/S Smith         688       10.3.6 Steam and Feedwater System 4/12/P5 Materials r
4.5.1 CRD Structur61 Materials 4/12/85 Johnsen/
N/S = None Submitteo
4 5.2.3 RC Pressure Boundary 8/19/25 Smith Materials 4/12/85 Johnson 4
5.2.4 RC Pressure Boundary 8/19/85 Inservice Inspection and Testing Johnson /
4 5.3.1 Reactor Vessel Materials 8/19/85 Smfth 4/12/85 Johnson 4
5.3.2 Pressure-Temperature Limits 8/19/85 Johnson 4
5.3.3 Reactor Vessel Integrity 8/19/85 Unknown 4
5.4.1.1 Reactor Coolant Pumps N/S (Flyv Feel Integrity)
Johnson /
4 5.4.2.1 Steam Generator Materials 8/19/85-Smith 4/12/85 Smith 1, 10 6.1.1 Metallic Materials 4/12/85 7/15/85 Unknown TBD 6.2.7 fracture Prevention of N/S Contairment Pressure Boundary Unknown TBD 6.6 Inservice Inspection of N/S Class 2 and 3 components Unknown 658 10.2.3 Turbine Disk Integrity N/S Smith 688 10.3.6 Steam and Feedwater System 4/12/P5 Materials N/S = None Submitteo r


l.
l.
Division /                   Former                                               SER*
Division /
Branch               Reviewer Reviewer     Module               Section           Dates DEST /EMEB                   Kirkwood/       7   3.1.1 Conformance with GDC       N/S Chan Kirkwood/Chan   7   3.1.2 Conformance with Industry N/S Codes and Standards Kirkwood       1, 7 3.2.1 Seismic Classification     N/S Kirkwood       1, 7 3.2.2 Classification Systems     N/S Chan           7   3.6.2 Determination of Break     N/S Locations and Dynamic Effects Associated with the Postulated Rupture of Piping flou/ Sellers   5   3.9 Mechanical Systems and       N/S Components Kirkwood       4   5.2.1 Compliance with Codes and N/S Code Cases (Integrity of RCP Poundary)
Former SER*
Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /EMEB Kirkwood/
7 3.1.1 Conformance with GDC N/S Chan Kirkwood/Chan 7
3.1.2 Conformance with Industry N/S Codes and Standards Kirkwood 1, 7 3.2.1 Seismic Classification N/S Kirkwood 1, 7 3.2.2 Classification Systems N/S Chan 7
3.6.2 Determination of Break N/S Locations and Dynamic Effects Associated with the Postulated Rupture of Piping flou/ Sellers 5
3.9 Mechanical Systems and N/S Components Kirkwood 4
5.2.1 Compliance with Codes and N/S Code Cases (Integrity of RCP Poundary)
* N/S = None Submitted
* N/S = None Submitted


l.
l.
Division /                   Former                                                   SER*
Division /
Branch             Reviewer Reviewer   Module               Section                 Dates DEST /ESGR                   TBD         3   2.1 Geography and Demography           3/11/85 t
Former SER*
TBD         3   2.P Nearby Industrial, Transportation, 3/11/85 and Military Facilities Unknown     3   2.4 Hydraulic Engineering               N/S Unknown     3   2.5.1 Basic Geologic and Seismic       N/S Information Unknown     3   P.S.2 Vibratory Ground Motion           N/S               ;
Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /ESGR TBD 3
IJnknown     3   2.5.3 Surface Faulting                   N/S Chan         3   2.5.4 Stability of Subsurface           3/5/85 Materials and Foundations Chan         3   2.5.5_ Stability of Slopes               3/5/85           -
2.1 Geography and Demography 3/11/85 t
Chan         3   2.5.6 Embankments and Dass               3/5/85 Chan         7   3.3 Wind and Tornado Loadings           N/S Giese-Koch   7   3.7 Seismic Design                       N/S**
TBD 3
Chan         7   3.8 Design of Seismic Category I         N/S Structures                                               .
2.P Nearby Industrial, Transportation, 3/11/85 and Military Facilities Unknown 3
Jackson     7   3.10 Seismic and Dynamic                 8/29/85 Oualification of Seismic Category I Instrumentation and Electrical Equipment
2.4 Hydraulic Engineering N/S Unknown 3
;
2.5.1 Basic Geologic and Seismic N/S Information Unknown 3
P.S.2 Vibratory Ground Motion N/S IJnknown 3
2.5.3 Surface Faulting N/S Chan 3
2.5.4 Stability of Subsurface 3/5/85 Materials and Foundations Chan 3
2.5.5_ Stability of Slopes 3/5/85 Chan 3
2.5.6 Embankments and Dass 3/5/85 Chan 7
3.3 Wind and Tornado Loadings N/S Giese-Koch 7
3.7 Seismic Design N/S**
Chan 7
3.8 Design of Seismic Category I N/S Structures Jackson 7
3.10 Seismic and Dynamic 8/29/85 Oualification of Seismic Category I Instrumentation and Electrical Equipment
* N/S = None Submitted
* N/S = None Submitted
  ** SER in Concurrence
** SER in Concurrence


Division /                           Former                                                           SER*
Division /
Branch               Reviewer         Reviewer   Module                 Section                       Dates DEST /ECEB                           Kirslis     1       6.1.2 Organic Materials                     8/28/85         ,
Former SER*
Kirlis     1, 10   6.1.3 Post accident Emergency               8/28/85 Cooling Peters Kirs11s     6A8     10.3.5 Secondary Water Chenistry             8/28/85-Kirslis     688     10.4.6 Condensate Cleanup                   8/28/85 System Kirslis     688     10.4.8 Steam Generator Blowdown             8/28/85 Processing System
Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /ECEB Kirslis 1
* N/S = None Submitted 9                   .
6.1.2 Organic Materials 8/28/85 Kirlis 1, 10 6.1.3 Post accident Emergency 8/28/85 Cooling Peters Kirs11s 6A8 10.3.5 Secondary Water Chenistry 8/28/85-Kirslis 688 10.4.6 Condensate Cleanup 8/28/85 System Kirslis 688 10.4.8 Steam Generator Blowdown 8/28/85 Processing System
* N/S = None Submitted I
9


l Division /                   Former                                             SER*
l Division /
Branch             Reviewer Reviewer Podule               Section               Dates DEST /SICB                   Burrows   9   7.1 Introduction to Instrumentation Draft exists and Controls Burrows   9   7.2. Reactor Trip                   Draft exists Burrows   9   7.3 engineered Safety Features     Draft exists Burrows   9   7.4 Systems Required for Safe       Draft exists Shutdowns Burro.:   9   7.5 Instrumentation Important       Draft exists to Safety Burrows   9   7.6 All Other Systems Required     Draft exists for Safety Burrows   9   7.7 Control and Instrumentation     Draft exists Systems Saba/     15   7.8 Control Room                   N/S Weiss /           (2ndary responsibility)
Former SER*
,                              Kennedy
Branch Reviewer Reviewer Podule Section Dates DEST /SICB Burrows 9
7.1 Introduction to Instrumentation Draft exists and Controls Burrows 9
7.2. Reactor Trip Draft exists Burrows 9
7.3 engineered Safety Features Draft exists Burrows 9
7.4 Systems Required for Safe Draft exists Shutdowns Burro.:
9 7.5 Instrumentation Important Draft exists to Safety Burrows 9
7.6 All Other Systems Required Draft exists for Safety Burrows 9
7.7 Control and Instrumentation Draft exists Systems Saba/
15 7.8 Control Room N/S Weiss /
(2ndary responsibility)
Kennedy
* N/S = None Submitted
* N/S = None Submitted


l.
l.
Division /                   Former                                               SER*
Division /
Branch             Reviewer Reviewer                     Section Module                                      Dates DEST /SELB                   Unknown   7   3.11 Environmental Design of         N/S Mechanical and Electrical Equipment Gill     9     8.1 Introduction to Electrical       N/S-Power 9   8.2 Offsite Power System             N/S 9   8.? Onsite Power Systems             N/S 2
Former SER*
Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /SELB Unknown 7
3.11 Environmental Design of N/S Mechanical and Electrical Equipment Gill 9
8.1 Introduction to Electrical N/S-Power 9
8.2 Offsite Power System N/S 9
8.? Onsite Power Systems N/S 2
4 J
4 J
* N/S = None Submitted
* N/S = None Submitted i
\\


Division /                         Former                                             SERO     .
Division /
Branch                     Reviewer Reviewer Module               Section             Dates DEST /SPLB                         Unknown   3   2.3 t'eteorology                   N/S Giardina   7   3.4 Mater Level (Flood) Design     N/S Giardina   7   3.5 Missile Protection             N/S Unknown   7   3.6.1 Postulated Piping Failures in N/S Fluid Systems Inside and Outside Containment Giardina   4   5.2.5 RCP Boundary leakage         N/S Detection Tinker   10   6.2.1 Primary Containment           N/$
Former SERO Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /SPLB Unknown 3
Functional Design Tinker   1, 10 6.2.2 Containment Heat Removal     7/11/83 System Tinker   10   6.2.3 Secondary Containment         N/S Functional Design Tinker   10   6.2.4 Containment Isolation System N/S Tinker   10   6.2.5 Combustible Gas Control       N/S in Ct,ntainment Tinker   10   6.2.6 Containment Leakage Testing   N/S
2.3 t'eteorology N/S Giardina 7
,                                                              Unknown   13   6.4 Control Room Habitablity       N/S Unknown   10   6.5.1 Engineered Safety Feature     N/S Filters Read     1, 10 6.5.2 Containment Spray System     3/28/85 (Fission Product Removal)
3.4 Mater Level (Flood) Design N/S Giardina 7
Unknown   10   6.5.3 Fission Product Control       N/S Systems
3.5 Missile Protection N/S Unknown 7
3.6.1 Postulated Piping Failures in N/S Fluid Systems Inside and Outside Containment Giardina 4
5.2.5 RCP Boundary leakage N/S Detection Tinker 10 6.2.1 Primary Containment N/$
Functional Design Tinker 1, 10 6.2.2 Containment Heat Removal 7/11/83 System Tinker 10 6.2.3 Secondary Containment N/S Functional Design Tinker 10 6.2.4 Containment Isolation System N/S Tinker 10 6.2.5 Combustible Gas Control N/S in Ct,ntainment Tinker 10 6.2.6 Containment Leakage Testing N/S Unknown 13 6.4 Control Room Habitablity N/S Unknown 10 6.5.1 Engineered Safety Feature N/S Filters Read 1, 10 6.5.2 Containment Spray System 3/28/85 (Fission Product Removal)
Unknown 10 6.5.3 Fission Product Control N/S Systems
* N/S = None Submitted
* N/S = None Submitted


Division /                   Former                                             SERO   .  .
Division /
Branch             Reviewer Reviewer Module               Section               Dates DEST /SPLB                   Unknown   13   9.1 Fuel Storage and Handling       N/S Unknown   13   9.2 Water Systems                   N/S Unknown   13   9.3.1 Compressed Air System         N/S Unknown   13   9.3.2 Process and Post Accident     N/S Sampling System Unknown   13   9.3.3 Equipment and Floor           N/S Drainage System Unknown   13   9.3.6 Chlorine Supply System       N/S Unknown   13   9.4.1 Control Equipment Area       N/S Ventilation System Unknown   13   9.4.2 Reactor External Building     N/S Ventilation System Unknown   13   9.4.3 Radwaste Building Ventilation N/S System Design Criteria Unknown   13   9.4.4 Turbine Building Ventilation N/S System Design Criteria Unknown   13   9.4.5 Annulas Air Clean up and     N/S Fuel Building Exhaust System Unknown   13   9.4.6 Containment Cooling and       N/S-Ventilation System Unkncwn   13   9.4.7 D/G Building Ventilation     N/S System Unknown   13   9.4.8 Essential Service Water Pump N/S Structure Ventilation System Design Criteria Unknown   13   9.4.9 Plant Heating System Design   N/S Cri',eria
Former SERO Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /SPLB Unknown 13 9.1 Fuel Storage and Handling N/S Unknown 13 9.2 Water Systems N/S Unknown 13 9.3.1 Compressed Air System N/S Unknown 13 9.3.2 Process and Post Accident N/S Sampling System Unknown 13 9.3.3 Equipment and Floor N/S Drainage System Unknown 13 9.3.6 Chlorine Supply System N/S Unknown 13 9.4.1 Control Equipment Area N/S Ventilation System Unknown 13 9.4.2 Reactor External Building N/S Ventilation System Unknown 13 9.4.3 Radwaste Building Ventilation N/S System Design Criteria Unknown 13 9.4.4 Turbine Building Ventilation N/S System Design Criteria Unknown 13 9.4.5 Annulas Air Clean up and N/S Fuel Building Exhaust System Unknown 13 9.4.6 Containment Cooling and N/S-Ventilation System Unkncwn 13 9.4.7 D/G Building Ventilation N/S System Unknown 13 9.4.8 Essential Service Water Pump N/S Structure Ventilation System Design Criteria Unknown 13 9.4.9 Plant Heating System Design N/S Cri',eria
* N/S = None Submitted
* N/S = None Submitted


Divisicn/                           Former                                               SER*       -
Divisicn/
Branch               Reviewer       Reviewer Module               Section                 Dates DEST /SPLB (cont.)                 Unknown   13   9.4.10 Essential chilled Water System N/S Unknown   13   9.5.1 Fire Protection System         N/S Unknown   13   9.5.2 Communication System           N/S Unknown   13   9.5.3 Lighting Systems               N/S Unknown   13   9.5.4 Emergency Diesel Engine Fuel   N/S 011 Storage and Transfer Systems Unknown   13   9.5.5 Emergency Diesel Engine Cooling N/S Water System I!nknown 13   9.5.6 Emergency Diesel Engine         N/S Starting System Unknown   13   9.5.7 Dnergency Diesel Engine         N/S Lubrication System Unknown   13   9.5.8 Emergency Diesel Engine         N/S Combustion Air Intake and Exhaust System Unknown   6&8   10.1 Description of Steam and         N/S Power Conversion System Unknown   688   10.2.1 & 10.2.2 Turbine Generator     N/S Unknown   688   10.3.1 Main Steam Supply System       N/S
Former SER*
,                                                                                                                (Up to and Including MSIVs)
Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /SPLB (cont.)
Unknown   6&8   10.3.2, 10.3.3 and 10.3.4 Main       N/S Steam Supply System Unknown   688   10.4.1 Main Condenser                 N/S Lee       6A8   10.4.2 Main Ccndenser Evacuation     N/S System Lee       688   10.4.3 Turbine Gland Sealing System   2/8/85
Unknown 13 9.4.10 Essential chilled Water System N/S Unknown 13 9.5.1 Fire Protection System N/S Unknown 13 9.5.2 Communication System N/S Unknown 13 9.5.3 Lighting Systems N/S Unknown 13 9.5.4 Emergency Diesel Engine Fuel N/S 011 Storage and Transfer Systems Unknown 13 9.5.5 Emergency Diesel Engine Cooling N/S Water System I!nknown 13 9.5.6 Emergency Diesel Engine N/S Starting System Unknown 13 9.5.7 Dnergency Diesel Engine N/S Lubrication System Unknown 13 9.5.8 Emergency Diesel Engine N/S Combustion Air Intake and Exhaust System Unknown 6&8 10.1 Description of Steam and N/S Power Conversion System Unknown 688 10.2.1 & 10.2.2 Turbine Generator N/S Unknown 688 10.3.1 Main Steam Supply System N/S (Up to and Including MSIVs)
Unknown 6&8 10.3.2, 10.3.3 and 10.3.4 Main N/S Steam Supply System Unknown 688 10.4.1 Main Condenser N/S Lee 6A8 10.4.2 Main Ccndenser Evacuation N/S System Lee 688 10.4.3 Turbine Gland Sealing System 2/8/85
* N/S = None Submitted
* N/S = None Submitted


Division /                   Former                                                 SER*
Division /
Branch             Reviewer Reviewer Podule               Section                 Dates OEST/SPLB (cont.)           l!nknown 688   10.4.4 Turbine Bypass System           N/S Unknown   6&B   10.4.5 Circulating Water Systen       N/S Giardina 688   10.4.7 Condensate and Feedwater       H/S System Giardina 6&8   10.4.9 Emergency Feedwater System     N/S Unkncwn   6A8   10.4.10 Startup Feedwater. System     N/S Unknown   688   10.4.11 Secondary I.fauid Waste       N/S System Fell     12   11.1 Source Terms                     N/S Fell     12   11.2 Liquid Waste Management           N/S System Fell     12   11.3 Gaseous Waste Processing         N/S System Fell     12   11.4 Solid Waste Processing System     N/S Fell     IP   11.5 Process and Effluent Radiological N/S Monitoring and Sampling Systems
Former SER*
Branch Reviewer Reviewer Podule Section Dates OEST/SPLB (cont.)
l!nknown 688 10.4.4 Turbine Bypass System N/S Unknown 6&B 10.4.5 Circulating Water Systen N/S Giardina 688 10.4.7 Condensate and Feedwater H/S System Giardina 6&8 10.4.9 Emergency Feedwater System N/S Unkncwn 6A8 10.4.10 Startup Feedwater. System N/S Unknown 688 10.4.11 Secondary I.fauid Waste N/S System Fell 12 11.1 Source Terms N/S Fell 12 11.2 Liquid Waste Management N/S System Fell 12 11.3 Gaseous Waste Processing N/S System Fell 12 11.4 Solid Waste Processing System N/S Fell IP 11.5 Process and Effluent Radiological N/S Monitoring and Sampling Systems
* N/S = None Submitted
* N/S = None Submitted


l.
l.
Division /                   Former                                                 SER*
Division /
Branch               Reviewer Reviewer   Module               Section               Dates DEST /SRXB                   Unknown     5   4.1 Description of Reactor           N/S Fu           5   4.2 Fuel System Mechanical Design   5/20/85 Richings/   5   4.3 Nuclear Design                   2/6/85 Schwenk Richings/   5   4.4.1 Thermal-Hydraulic Design       2/6/85 Schwenk           Basis Richings/   5   4.4.2 Thermal-Hydraulic Design       2/6/85 Schwenk         Methodology Richings/   5     4.4.3 Design Abnormalities           2/6/85 Schwenk Richings   5     4.4.4 Hydrodynamic stability         2/6/85 Schwenk Richings/   5     4.4.5 Loose Parts Monitoring         2/6/85 Schwenk           Systems 1
Former SER*
Richings/   5     4.4.6 Instrumentation for Inadequate 2/6/85 Schwenk           Core Cooling Detection (II.F.2)
Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /SRXB Unknown 5
Richings/   5     4.4.7 Summary and Conclusions       2/6/85~
4.1 Description of Reactor N/S Fu 5
Schwenk Giardina   5     4.6 Functional Design of Reactivity 4/4/86 Control Systems Lyon       4     5.2.2 Overpressure Protection       N/S System Lyon       4     5.4 Component and Subsystem Design   N/S i
4.2 Fuel System Mechanical Design 5/20/85 Richings/
(excluding 5.4.1.5 and 5.4.2.4)
5 4.3 Nuclear Design 2/6/85 Schwenk Richings/
Lyon       1     5.4.7 RHR Systems                   N/S
5 4.4.1 Thermal-Hydraulic Design 2/6/85 Schwenk Basis Richings/
* N/S = None Submitted
5 4.4.2 Thermal-Hydraulic Design 2/6/85 Schwenk Methodology Richings/
5 4.4.3 Design Abnormalities 2/6/85 Schwenk Richings 5
4.4.4 Hydrodynamic stability 2/6/85 Schwenk Richings/
5 4.4.5 Loose Parts Monitoring 2/6/85 Schwenk Systems 1
Richings/
5 4.4.6 Instrumentation for Inadequate 2/6/85 Schwenk Core Cooling Detection (II.F.2)
Richings/
5 4.4.7 Summary and Conclusions 2/6/85~
Schwenk Giardina 5
4.6 Functional Design of Reactivity 4/4/86 Control Systems Lyon 4
5.2.2 Overpressure Protection N/S System Lyon 4
5.4 Component and Subsystem Design N/S (excluding 5.4.1.5 and 5.4.2.4) i Lyon 1
5.4.7 RHR Systems N/S N/S = None Submitted
.i a
.i a


Division /                   Former                                                   SER*
Division /
Branch               Reviewer Reviewer Module                   Section               Dates DEST /SRXB (cont.)           Lyon         1       6.3 Emergency Core Cooling System   N/S Lyon       13         9.3.4 Chemical and Volume Control   N/S System Lyon       13         9.3.5 Boron Recycle System         N/S Lyon     4, 5,       15.1 General Discussion of Accident N/S 688       Analysis Methodology Lyon       6&8       15.2 Normal Operation and           N/S Anticipated transients Richings/ 4, 5       15.2.4 Reactivity and Power         2/6/85 1
Former SER*
Schwenk               Distribution Anomalies Lyon       a, 5       15.3 Limiting Accidents             N/S 688 Lyon     4, 5,       15.4 Radiological Consequences     N/S 6A8       of Accidents Lyon     4, 5, 688 15.5 NUREG-0737 Items                 N/S
Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /SRXB (cont.)
Lyon 1
6.3 Emergency Core Cooling System N/S Lyon 13 9.3.4 Chemical and Volume Control N/S System Lyon 13 9.3.5 Boron Recycle System N/S Lyon 4, 5, 15.1 General Discussion of Accident N/S 688 Analysis Methodology Lyon 6&8 15.2 Normal Operation and N/S Anticipated transients Richings/
4, 5 15.2.4 Reactivity and Power 2/6/85 Schwenk Distribution Anomalies 1
Lyon a, 5 15.3 Limiting Accidents N/S 688 Lyon 4, 5, 15.4 Radiological Consequences N/S 6A8 of Accidents Lyon 4, 5, 688 15.5 NUREG-0737 Items N/S
* N/S = None Submitted
* N/S = None Submitted


Division /                         Former                                                     SER*
Division /
Branch               Reviewer     Reviewer         Module                 Section           Dates DRIS/RSGB                           Unknown         N/A       I?.6 Physical Security           **
Former SER*
DLPQ/LQA8                           Unknown           13       17.0 Cuality Assurance           N/S DLPQ/LHFB                           Weiss /           15       7.8 Control Room                 N/S Saba/                     18.0 Human Factors Engineering   N/S Kennedy RES/PRA             Hardin/       Hardin/           16       Probabilistic Safety Study       Draft Exists BNL             FNL
Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DRIS/RSGB Unknown N/A I?.6 Physical Security DLPQ/LQA8 Unknown 13 17.0 Cuality Assurance N/S DLPQ/LHFB Weiss /
DREP/PRPB                           Skopec           11       12.0 Radiation Protection       4/10/87 Dunning /         2       Appendix C - USIs/ Generic     -
15 7.8 Control Room N/S Saba/
N/S Minners                   Issues ***
18.0 Human Factors Engineering N/S Kennedy RES/PRA Hardin/
Hardin/
16 Probabilistic Safety Study Draft Exists BNL FNL DREP/PRPB Skopec 11 12.0 Radiation Protection 4/10/87 Dunning /
2 Appendix C - USIs/ Generic N/S Minners Issues ***
* N/S = None Submitted
* N/S = None Submitted
  ** Sandia study addresses physical security considerations for WAPWR
** Sandia study addresses physical security considerations for WAPWR
  *** Westir.ghouse to postpone response to RAls until FDA
*** Westir.ghouse to postpone response to RAls until FDA
,                                                                                                                  ,}}
,}}

Latest revision as of 02:55, 4 December 2024

Requests Assignment of Technical Reviewers to Westinghouse Oct 1983 Advance PWR (RESAR SP/90) Application.Brief History & Status of Project,Tentative Review Schedule & Listing of Issued Sers,Former Reviewers & PSAR Modules Encl
ML20213H052
Person / Time
Site: 05000601
Issue date: 05/12/1987
From: Kenyon T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Bagchi G, Cheng C, Marsh T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8705190121
Download: ML20213H052 (19)


Text

i[gno o

UNITED STATES 7

NUC:.. ' ?. ?.:C"L/d ORY COMMISSION n

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 4'

k..... p#

May 12, 1987 DOCKET NO. 50-601 MEMORANDUM FOR: Distribution (SeeAttached)

THRU:

Herbert N. Berkow, Director Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, Y and Special Projects FROM:

Thomas J. Kenyon, Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Directorate Division rf Reactor Projects III, IV, V arid Special Projects

SUBJECT:

RE0 VEST FOR ASSIGNMENT OF TECHNICAL REVIEWERS TO THE RESAR SP-90 APPLICATION The purpose of this memo is to request you previde me with the name(s) of the technical reviewer (s) who will be assi the review of the WAPWR (RESAR SP/90) gned the responsibility of completion of application. To assist you in your selection of these reviewers, I am forwarding the following information:

1. provides a brief history and status of the project.
2. provides a tentative review schedule which would result in issuance of a draft SER in April 1988, and the final SER by the end of 1988.
3. provides a listing of the SERs issued to date, the former reviewers (if known), and the PSAR modules in which the SER sections are discussed.

I have attempted to delineate which branch would have the primary responsibility over the SER sections. The delineation may be in error in some cases as no official listing of SRP responsibilities under the new organization has been issued to date.

As discussed during a May 7,1987 meeting with senior NRC management, PDSNP requests that, to the extent practicable, reviewers who have previously participated in the WAPWR review should be assigned to complete the review of this project. However, consideration must be given to the reviewer's ability to meet the proposed milestones for this review vs. those of other assigned projects.

Accordingly, I request you provide me with the name(s) of the assigned reviewer (s) in your branch, concurrence (or non-concurrence) with the proposed SER assignments.

and concurrence with the proposed schedule or identification of any problems in meeting that schedule.

0705190121 070512 ADOCK0500g1 PDR

- 1

May 12, 1987

. ~;

\\

2-Copies of the updated PSAR modules and the SERs can be ootained froc..te in Rooi.. P-908A. The Docket No. and PA No. are 50-601 and 141213, respectively.

My extension is X27064, Thomas J.ginal signed by ori Kenyon, Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, V and Special Projects

Enclosure:

As stated cc:

T. Murley F. Miraglia R. Starostecki D. Crutchfield L. Shao 4

J. Richardson i

A. Thadant s

J. Partlow F. Congel H. Miller D. Ross DISTRIBUTION:

i ipockettfiej NRC & Local PDR PDSNP Reading Ellylton TKenyon HBerkow OGC-BETH EJordan l

ACRS (10)

PDSN PDJW PDSNP M 6 E$ltoli TKeh

cw HBeM.o'w 05////87 05/j 87 05/sf/87 i

/

1

,-,-,r, w.--,

a,-, -,

-c-n

'Y(

\\

Copies of the updated PSAR modules and the SERs can be obtained from me in Room P-908A. The Docket No. and PA No. are 50-601 and 141213, respectively.

s My extension is X27064.

-l

?

A-l i

Th J. Kenyo, Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, V and Special Projects

Enclosure:

As stated cc:

T. Murley F. Miraglia R. Starostecki D. Crutchfield L. Shao J. Richardson A. Thadani J. Partlow F. Congel H. Miller D. Ross

DISTRIBUTION:

C. Y. Cheng, Acting Chief Materials Engineering Branch T. Marsh, Chief Mechanical Engineering Branch G. Bagchi, Acting Chief Structural & Geosciences Branch C. McCracken, Acting Chief Chemical Engineering Branch J. Mauk, Acting Chief Instrumentation & Control Systems Branch F. Rosa, Chief Electrical Systems Branch J. Craig, Acting Chief Plant Systems Branch M. W. Hodges, Chief Reactor Systems Branch R. Erickson, Chief Sateguards Branch L. J. Cunningham, Acting Chief Radiation Protection Eranch A. Beach, Acting Chief Quality Assurance Branch

~

W. Regan, Jr., Chief Human Factors Assessment Branch J. Murphy, Acting Chief Risk Applications Branch

.4 t

v t

i-j RESAR SP/90 Backgrcund and Current Status

Background

Westinghouse tendered the RESAR SP/90 application in October,1983, and the NRC determined the submittal was acceptable for docketing in January, 1984.

The original concept consisted of a module-by-module staff review. Westinghouse submitted the PDA application in modular form, with each module containing i

appropriate PSAR chapter sections to address plant features or design topics.

l The staff was to review each module individually and issue an SER for each module. Westinghouse's original submittal schedule began in October, 1983 and j

was to end in February,1985. Due to resource restraints within Westinghouse, r

the last module was not recefved until March, 1987.

1 I

Status Staff review was originally schedu;ed for completion in January,1986.

However, no SEPs have been issued to dato for any of the modules, although son draft SER sections have been completed.

For the last year or so, except for the review of the PRA (Module 16) by BNL, very little review effort took

{

place, due to resource restraints, lack of response by Westinghouse for l

extenced periods. and lack of completeness of individual modules.

It is difficult to accurately assess the review status quantitatively 4

because some of the earlier reviews might have to be at least partially redone by the current review crganizations. We estimate that the review is about 25%

{

complete.

i Proposed Action and Schedule Since all of the modules now have been submitted by Westinghouse, and all responses to RAls have been received, PDSNP proposes to perform en integrated review rather than a modular one. This will result in a more efficient review as well as a more comprehensive SER.

a As a result of the reorganization, approximately 30% of the former SP/90 review staff have been transferred to other non-related positions. PDSP l

proposes to establish a new review team with the intent of retaining former 1

reviewers to the extent practicable. SERs received to date will be distributed to the staff for reconcurrence by the new NRR management, and a review schedule for SP/90 will be established with the concurrence of the technical review branches. The review effort and schedule must, of course, be supported by Westinghouse. of this package provides a tentative review schedule. This schedule would result in the issuance of a draft SER in April,1988, and the final SER by the end of 1988.

The schedule is feasible only if the appropriate level of priority is established by upper management of both the NRC and Westinghouse.

i

-~

Tentative Review Schedule RESAR SP/90 1

1 1

Milestone Date

- Establish review team a review schedule, and 5/87 distribute SERs

- Q-1 inputs to P.M.

7/87

- Q-Is sent to Westinghouse 8/87 l

- Westinghouse responses 12/f.7

- Draft SER inputs to P.M.

3/88

- Draft SER issued 4/88

- k'estinghouse responses to draft SER 7/88

- Final SER inputs to P.M.

10/88

- Final SER issued 12/88 T

.c 7

r

-r~--4

---r-

--w-

~

ENCLOSURE 3 SER SECTIONS FOR RESAR SP/90 Division /

Former SER+

Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /EMTB Smith 5

4.5.1 CRD Structur61 Materials 4/12/85 Johnsen/

4 5.2.3 RC Pressure Boundary 8/19/25 Smith Materials 4/12/85 Johnson 4

5.2.4 RC Pressure Boundary 8/19/85 Inservice Inspection and Testing Johnson /

4 5.3.1 Reactor Vessel Materials 8/19/85 Smfth 4/12/85 Johnson 4

5.3.2 Pressure-Temperature Limits 8/19/85 Johnson 4

5.3.3 Reactor Vessel Integrity 8/19/85 Unknown 4

5.4.1.1 Reactor Coolant Pumps N/S (Flyv Feel Integrity)

Johnson /

4 5.4.2.1 Steam Generator Materials 8/19/85-Smith 4/12/85 Smith 1, 10 6.1.1 Metallic Materials 4/12/85 7/15/85 Unknown TBD 6.2.7 fracture Prevention of N/S Contairment Pressure Boundary Unknown TBD 6.6 Inservice Inspection of N/S Class 2 and 3 components Unknown 658 10.2.3 Turbine Disk Integrity N/S Smith 688 10.3.6 Steam and Feedwater System 4/12/P5 Materials N/S = None Submitteo r

l.

Division /

Former SER*

Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /EMEB Kirkwood/

7 3.1.1 Conformance with GDC N/S Chan Kirkwood/Chan 7

3.1.2 Conformance with Industry N/S Codes and Standards Kirkwood 1, 7 3.2.1 Seismic Classification N/S Kirkwood 1, 7 3.2.2 Classification Systems N/S Chan 7

3.6.2 Determination of Break N/S Locations and Dynamic Effects Associated with the Postulated Rupture of Piping flou/ Sellers 5

3.9 Mechanical Systems and N/S Components Kirkwood 4

5.2.1 Compliance with Codes and N/S Code Cases (Integrity of RCP Poundary)

  • N/S = None Submitted

l.

Division /

Former SER*

Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /ESGR TBD 3

2.1 Geography and Demography 3/11/85 t

TBD 3

2.P Nearby Industrial, Transportation, 3/11/85 and Military Facilities Unknown 3

2.4 Hydraulic Engineering N/S Unknown 3

2.5.1 Basic Geologic and Seismic N/S Information Unknown 3

P.S.2 Vibratory Ground Motion N/S IJnknown 3

2.5.3 Surface Faulting N/S Chan 3

2.5.4 Stability of Subsurface 3/5/85 Materials and Foundations Chan 3

2.5.5_ Stability of Slopes 3/5/85 Chan 3

2.5.6 Embankments and Dass 3/5/85 Chan 7

3.3 Wind and Tornado Loadings N/S Giese-Koch 7

3.7 Seismic Design N/S**

Chan 7

3.8 Design of Seismic Category I N/S Structures Jackson 7

3.10 Seismic and Dynamic 8/29/85 Oualification of Seismic Category I Instrumentation and Electrical Equipment

  • N/S = None Submitted
    • SER in Concurrence

Division /

Former SER*

Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /ECEB Kirslis 1

6.1.2 Organic Materials 8/28/85 Kirlis 1, 10 6.1.3 Post accident Emergency 8/28/85 Cooling Peters Kirs11s 6A8 10.3.5 Secondary Water Chenistry 8/28/85-Kirslis 688 10.4.6 Condensate Cleanup 8/28/85 System Kirslis 688 10.4.8 Steam Generator Blowdown 8/28/85 Processing System

  • N/S = None Submitted I

9

l Division /

Former SER*

Branch Reviewer Reviewer Podule Section Dates DEST /SICB Burrows 9

7.1 Introduction to Instrumentation Draft exists and Controls Burrows 9

7.2. Reactor Trip Draft exists Burrows 9

7.3 engineered Safety Features Draft exists Burrows 9

7.4 Systems Required for Safe Draft exists Shutdowns Burro.:

9 7.5 Instrumentation Important Draft exists to Safety Burrows 9

7.6 All Other Systems Required Draft exists for Safety Burrows 9

7.7 Control and Instrumentation Draft exists Systems Saba/

15 7.8 Control Room N/S Weiss /

(2ndary responsibility)

Kennedy

  • N/S = None Submitted

l.

Division /

Former SER*

Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /SELB Unknown 7

3.11 Environmental Design of N/S Mechanical and Electrical Equipment Gill 9

8.1 Introduction to Electrical N/S-Power 9

8.2 Offsite Power System N/S 9

8.? Onsite Power Systems N/S 2

4 J

  • N/S = None Submitted i

\\

Division /

Former SERO Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /SPLB Unknown 3

2.3 t'eteorology N/S Giardina 7

3.4 Mater Level (Flood) Design N/S Giardina 7

3.5 Missile Protection N/S Unknown 7

3.6.1 Postulated Piping Failures in N/S Fluid Systems Inside and Outside Containment Giardina 4

5.2.5 RCP Boundary leakage N/S Detection Tinker 10 6.2.1 Primary Containment N/$

Functional Design Tinker 1, 10 6.2.2 Containment Heat Removal 7/11/83 System Tinker 10 6.2.3 Secondary Containment N/S Functional Design Tinker 10 6.2.4 Containment Isolation System N/S Tinker 10 6.2.5 Combustible Gas Control N/S in Ct,ntainment Tinker 10 6.2.6 Containment Leakage Testing N/S Unknown 13 6.4 Control Room Habitablity N/S Unknown 10 6.5.1 Engineered Safety Feature N/S Filters Read 1, 10 6.5.2 Containment Spray System 3/28/85 (Fission Product Removal)

Unknown 10 6.5.3 Fission Product Control N/S Systems

  • N/S = None Submitted

Division /

Former SERO Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /SPLB Unknown 13 9.1 Fuel Storage and Handling N/S Unknown 13 9.2 Water Systems N/S Unknown 13 9.3.1 Compressed Air System N/S Unknown 13 9.3.2 Process and Post Accident N/S Sampling System Unknown 13 9.3.3 Equipment and Floor N/S Drainage System Unknown 13 9.3.6 Chlorine Supply System N/S Unknown 13 9.4.1 Control Equipment Area N/S Ventilation System Unknown 13 9.4.2 Reactor External Building N/S Ventilation System Unknown 13 9.4.3 Radwaste Building Ventilation N/S System Design Criteria Unknown 13 9.4.4 Turbine Building Ventilation N/S System Design Criteria Unknown 13 9.4.5 Annulas Air Clean up and N/S Fuel Building Exhaust System Unknown 13 9.4.6 Containment Cooling and N/S-Ventilation System Unkncwn 13 9.4.7 D/G Building Ventilation N/S System Unknown 13 9.4.8 Essential Service Water Pump N/S Structure Ventilation System Design Criteria Unknown 13 9.4.9 Plant Heating System Design N/S Cri',eria

  • N/S = None Submitted

Divisicn/

Former SER*

Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /SPLB (cont.)

Unknown 13 9.4.10 Essential chilled Water System N/S Unknown 13 9.5.1 Fire Protection System N/S Unknown 13 9.5.2 Communication System N/S Unknown 13 9.5.3 Lighting Systems N/S Unknown 13 9.5.4 Emergency Diesel Engine Fuel N/S 011 Storage and Transfer Systems Unknown 13 9.5.5 Emergency Diesel Engine Cooling N/S Water System I!nknown 13 9.5.6 Emergency Diesel Engine N/S Starting System Unknown 13 9.5.7 Dnergency Diesel Engine N/S Lubrication System Unknown 13 9.5.8 Emergency Diesel Engine N/S Combustion Air Intake and Exhaust System Unknown 6&8 10.1 Description of Steam and N/S Power Conversion System Unknown 688 10.2.1 & 10.2.2 Turbine Generator N/S Unknown 688 10.3.1 Main Steam Supply System N/S (Up to and Including MSIVs)

Unknown 6&8 10.3.2, 10.3.3 and 10.3.4 Main N/S Steam Supply System Unknown 688 10.4.1 Main Condenser N/S Lee 6A8 10.4.2 Main Ccndenser Evacuation N/S System Lee 688 10.4.3 Turbine Gland Sealing System 2/8/85

  • N/S = None Submitted

Division /

Former SER*

Branch Reviewer Reviewer Podule Section Dates OEST/SPLB (cont.)

l!nknown 688 10.4.4 Turbine Bypass System N/S Unknown 6&B 10.4.5 Circulating Water Systen N/S Giardina 688 10.4.7 Condensate and Feedwater H/S System Giardina 6&8 10.4.9 Emergency Feedwater System N/S Unkncwn 6A8 10.4.10 Startup Feedwater. System N/S Unknown 688 10.4.11 Secondary I.fauid Waste N/S System Fell 12 11.1 Source Terms N/S Fell 12 11.2 Liquid Waste Management N/S System Fell 12 11.3 Gaseous Waste Processing N/S System Fell 12 11.4 Solid Waste Processing System N/S Fell IP 11.5 Process and Effluent Radiological N/S Monitoring and Sampling Systems

  • N/S = None Submitted

l.

Division /

Former SER*

Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /SRXB Unknown 5

4.1 Description of Reactor N/S Fu 5

4.2 Fuel System Mechanical Design 5/20/85 Richings/

5 4.3 Nuclear Design 2/6/85 Schwenk Richings/

5 4.4.1 Thermal-Hydraulic Design 2/6/85 Schwenk Basis Richings/

5 4.4.2 Thermal-Hydraulic Design 2/6/85 Schwenk Methodology Richings/

5 4.4.3 Design Abnormalities 2/6/85 Schwenk Richings 5

4.4.4 Hydrodynamic stability 2/6/85 Schwenk Richings/

5 4.4.5 Loose Parts Monitoring 2/6/85 Schwenk Systems 1

Richings/

5 4.4.6 Instrumentation for Inadequate 2/6/85 Schwenk Core Cooling Detection (II.F.2)

Richings/

5 4.4.7 Summary and Conclusions 2/6/85~

Schwenk Giardina 5

4.6 Functional Design of Reactivity 4/4/86 Control Systems Lyon 4

5.2.2 Overpressure Protection N/S System Lyon 4

5.4 Component and Subsystem Design N/S (excluding 5.4.1.5 and 5.4.2.4) i Lyon 1

5.4.7 RHR Systems N/S N/S = None Submitted

.i a

Division /

Former SER*

Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DEST /SRXB (cont.)

Lyon 1

6.3 Emergency Core Cooling System N/S Lyon 13 9.3.4 Chemical and Volume Control N/S System Lyon 13 9.3.5 Boron Recycle System N/S Lyon 4, 5, 15.1 General Discussion of Accident N/S 688 Analysis Methodology Lyon 6&8 15.2 Normal Operation and N/S Anticipated transients Richings/

4, 5 15.2.4 Reactivity and Power 2/6/85 Schwenk Distribution Anomalies 1

Lyon a, 5 15.3 Limiting Accidents N/S 688 Lyon 4, 5, 15.4 Radiological Consequences N/S 6A8 of Accidents Lyon 4, 5, 688 15.5 NUREG-0737 Items N/S

  • N/S = None Submitted

Division /

Former SER*

Branch Reviewer Reviewer Module Section Dates DRIS/RSGB Unknown N/A I?.6 Physical Security DLPQ/LQA8 Unknown 13 17.0 Cuality Assurance N/S DLPQ/LHFB Weiss /

15 7.8 Control Room N/S Saba/

18.0 Human Factors Engineering N/S Kennedy RES/PRA Hardin/

Hardin/

16 Probabilistic Safety Study Draft Exists BNL FNL DREP/PRPB Skopec 11 12.0 Radiation Protection 4/10/87 Dunning /

2 Appendix C - USIs/ Generic N/S Minners Issues ***

  • N/S = None Submitted
    • Sandia study addresses physical security considerations for WAPWR
      • Westir.ghouse to postpone response to RAls until FDA

,