ML20237J171: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:$.
{{#Wiki_filter:$.
b-9..0oreg
b-
            .h         'o
..0 9 oreg
                        ~,                         UNITED STATES .
.h
        .[ $e ' ,g                     NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 7n              p l                       August 12, 1987 l
'o UNITED STATES.
j PEMORANDUM FOR: Edward J. Butcher, Chief-                                               I Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR THRU:             David C. Fischer, Section Chief.                                       l Special Projects Section l
~,
Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR FROM:               Kulin D. Desai,-Reactor Engineer Technical Specifications. Branch .            .
.[ $e ',g NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7n p
.                              ' Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR                       '
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 l
l August 12, 1987 j
PEMORANDUM FOR: Edward J. Butcher, Chief-I Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR THRU:
David C. Fischer, Section Chief.
l Special Projects Section l
Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR FROM:
Kulin D. Desai,-Reactor Engineer Technical Specifications. Branch.
' Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF MEETING WITH NUMARC STS COORDINATION WORKING GROUP i
OF MEETING WITH NUMARC STS COORDINATION WORKING GROUP i
The NRC Staff and the members of FUMARC STS Coordination Working Group (STSCWG) met on July 17, 1987 in Bethesda, Maryland to discus.their current             i activities and future plans.                                                             j It appears that STSCWG is active, well organized and focusing on issues                 j similar to those identified in the TSB program plan. The TSB and Industry program plans are compatible with only minor differences'between task
The NRC Staff and the members of FUMARC STS Coordination Working Group (STSCWG) met on July 17, 1987 in Bethesda, Maryland to discus.their current i
activities and future plans.
j It appears that STSCWG is active, well organized and focusing on issues j
similar to those identified in the TSB program plan. The TSB and Industry program plans are compatible with only minor differences'between task priorities and schedules'.
Industry would like to resolve certain policy
_~
_~
    -        priorities and schedules'. Industry would like to resolve certain policy issues upfront instead of working on these issues in parallel with new STS development as outlined in the TSB program plan. 'Specifically, Industry would like to resolve these policy issues, several human factors issues and             a get each owners group TS split approved by the NRC by December 31, 1987. Once these key issues are resolved, each owners group will move forward with its             :
issues upfront instead of working on these issues in parallel with new STS development as outlined in the TSB program plan. 'Specifically, Industry would like to resolve these policy issues, several human factors issues and a
Phase II program i.e., development of complete new STS. TSB will adjust the             4 priorities and schedules in its program plan to achieve similar objectives.             ;
get each owners group TS split approved by the NRC by December 31, 1987. Once these key issues are resolved, each owners group will move forward with its Phase II program i.e., development of complete new STS. TSB will adjust the 4
TSB and STSCWG will work closely to resolve these high priority issues.                 1 NUMARC will act as an executive body providing broad policy directions to STSCWG. NUMARC will resolve major differences between the owners groups activities. STSCWG will implement the NUMARC directives.
priorities and schedules in its program plan to achieve similar objectives.
4 STSWCG outlined the tasks included in their program plan for' making Technical-Specifications Improvements. The activities-described in Industry s program plan fit into the following categories according to priority:                     /
TSB and STSCWG will work closely to resolve these high priority issues.
pY f       {lb 8708180012 870' 12 PDR     ORG NRRA PDR   a
1 NUMARC will act as an executive body providing broad policy directions to STSCWG. NUMARC will resolve major differences between the owners groups activities. STSCWG will implement the NUMARC directives.
4 STSWCG outlined the tasks included in their program plan for' making Technical-Specifications Improvements. The activities-described in Industry s program plan fit into the following categories according to priority:
/
pY f
{lb 8708180012 870' 12 PDR ORG NRRA PDR a


r s
r s
Edward J. Butcher                                     August ~12, 1987 Category I - Generic Policy Issues
Edward J. Butcher August ~12, 1987 Category I - Generic Policy Issues Plant specific deviations from new STS TS Bases Content and Details Control of Bases (i.e., Is NRC approval needed for a change?)
            -    Plant specific deviations from new STS TS Bases Content and Details
Sholly issues (Can it be a generic sholly?)
            -    Control of Bases (i.e., Is NRC approval needed for a change?)
Relocation and control of items removed from TS Regulatory exemptions (RETS)
            -    Sholly issues (Can it be a generic sholly?)
Relocation and control of items removed from TS
            -    Regulatory exemptions (RETS)         ,
STSCWG will develoo a common position for each of these generic policy issues. They plan to submit their positions to the staff by September 1987.
STSCWG will develoo a common position for each of these generic policy issues. They plan to submit their positions to the staff by September 1987.
Category II - Human Factors Issues Fonnat
Category II - Human Factors Issues Fonnat Organization of LCOs and Surveillance Levels of details in LCOs Definitions Writing Style Refueling TS (i.e., where to put them)
            -    Organization of LCOs and Surveillance Levels of details in LCOs Definitions Writing Style
Location of Tabular Information STSCWG is working on these issues and will submit a report addressing them to the staff by November 1987.
            -    Refueling TS (i.e., where to put them)
Category III - TS Split Matrix Each vendor owners group will prepare a separate topical report presenting their TS split findings. STSCWG will prepare an additional topical report which will include a TL Split matrix presenting all vendors TS split results and justification for differences. Detailed rationale for decisions made by l
            -    Location of Tabular Information STSCWG is working on these issues and will submit a report addressing them to the staff by November 1987.
each owners group in doing their TS split will be provided in the vendor i
Category III - TS Split Matrix Each vendor owners group will prepare a separate topical report presenting their TS split findings. STSCWG will prepare an additional topical report which will include a TL Split matrix presenting all vendors TS split results and justification for differences. Detailed rationale for decisions made by l           each owners group in doing their TS split will be provided in the vendor i           specific TS split topical report. STSCWG would like to meet with the staff by the end of September 1987 to discuss the split topical reports. .The vendors plan to submit all topical reports to the staff for review and would like the l           staff's decision on these topical reports by the end of December 1987.
specific TS split topical report. STSCWG would like to meet with the staff by the end of September 1987 to discuss the split topical reports..The vendors plan to submit all topical reports to the staff for review and would like the l
staff's decision on these topical reports by the end of December 1987.
Categories IV, V, and VI - Line Items Improvement These sections identified activities associated with specific line item improvements (e.g., cycle specific variables).
Categories IV, V, and VI - Line Items Improvement These sections identified activities associated with specific line item improvements (e.g., cycle specific variables).
      .      STSCWG is placing highest priority on the first three category items and is putting significant effort into completing these items by December 1987, thereby culminating their Phase I programs. Phase II programs will include new STS development.
STSCWG is placing highest priority on the first three category items and is putting significant effort into completing these items by December 1987, thereby culminating their Phase I programs.
Phase II programs will include new STS development.
i l
i l
i 4
i 4


j                                                                                 v l*.
j v
l*.
i j
i j
Edward J. Butcher                                   August 12, 1987 j
Edward J. Butcher August 12, 1987 j
STSCWG provided comments on the TSB program plan. Overall, both program plans I are in good agreement regarding the general approach for making Technical Specifications improvements. However, Industry prefers to resolve the policy   j issues upfront instead of working on these issues in parallel with new STS   j development as outlined in TSB program plan. TSB will adjust the priorities   1 and schedules in its Program Plan to be more compatible with those in the     _j Industry plan.                                                                 I Enclosed is an attendance list and the agenda for the meeting.
STSCWG provided comments on the TSB program plan.
J r
Overall, both program plans I
h f h, 3.) f5fM Kulin D. Desai, Reactor Engineer     <
are in good agreement regarding the general approach for making Technical Specifications improvements. However, Industry prefers to resolve the policy j
Technical Specifications Branch       )
issues upfront instead of working on these issues in parallel with new STS j
Division of Operational Events       j Assessment, NRR                     !
development as outlined in TSB program plan. TSB will adjust the priorities 1
Enclosure-                                                                     '
and schedules in its Program Plan to be more compatible with those in the
As stated cc w/ enc 1:                                                                   I R. W. Starostecki C. E. Rossi                                                                     l l
_j Industry plan.
Distribution:                                                                   l TSB R/F DOEA R/F,.m     _m..
I Enclosed is an attendance list and the agenda for the meeting.
(Central . Fills,s. _LDCSL(016)?))
J h f h, 3.) f5fM r
Kulin D. Desai, Reactor Engineer Technical Specifications Branch
)
Division of Operational Events j
Assessment, NRR Enclosure-As stated cc w/ enc 1:
I R. W. Starostecki C. E. Rossi l
l Distribution:
l TSB R/F DOEA R/F,.m (Central. Fills,s
_m..
. _LDCSL(016)?))
PDR EJButcher DCFischer CHBerlinger WDLanning DBrinkman SNewberry TCox TSB Members (MEMOTOBUTCHERFROMDESAI)
PDR EJButcher DCFischer CHBerlinger WDLanning DBrinkman SNewberry TCox TSB Members (MEMOTOBUTCHERFROMDESAI)
                  #3 TSB:D0EA:NRR 3G -
#3 3G -
TSB:DOEA:NRR KDDesai: dim           DCFischer 08//f./87             08/11/87 e
TSB:D0EA:NRR TSB:DOEA:NRR KDDesai: dim DCFischer 08//f./87 08/11/87 e


        - 4.
- 4.
O~
O~
  \
\\
NRC/NUMARC MEETING JULY 17, 1987 NAME                                 ORGANIZATION Kulin D. Desai                         NRC/TSB David C. Fischer                     NRC/TSB Edward J. Butcher                     NRC/TSB Richard L. Emch                       NRC/TSB Biff Bradley                         Georgia Power /BWROG Ed Lozito                             Virginia Power /WOG             i Gregg A. Sinders                     Carolina Power & Light /WOG-
NRC/NUMARC MEETING JULY 17, 1987 NAME ORGANIZATION Kulin D. Desai NRC/TSB David C. Fischer NRC/TSB Edward J. Butcher NRC/TSB Richard L. Emch NRC/TSB Biff Bradley Georgia Power /BWROG Ed Lozito Virginia Power /WOG i
                                                                                  .I Ton Tipton NUMARC-1726 M Street N.W.
Gregg A. Sinders Carolina Power & Light /WOG-
.I Ton Tipton NUMARC-1726 M Street N.W.
Suite 903 l
Suite 903 l
Washington, D.C. 20034 202-872-1280 Bob Gill                             Duke Power /B&WOG Peter Smith                           So, California Edison Company Stuart Webster                       CE/ANS 58.4 Millard Wohl                         NRC/TSB Elinor G. Adensam                     NRC/NRR/PDII-1 Sam Bryan                             NRC/TSB Calvin W. Moon                       NRC/TSB Stewart W. Brown                     NRC/TSB Thomas G. Dunning                     NRC/TSB David Langford                       NRC/TSB
Washington, D.C.
  .-          Bernard Mann                         NRC/TSB
20034 202-872-1280 Bob Gill Duke Power /B&WOG Peter Smith So, California Edison Company Stuart Webster CE/ANS 58.4 Millard Wohl NRC/TSB Elinor G. Adensam NRC/NRR/PDII-1 Sam Bryan NRC/TSB Calvin W. Moon NRC/TSB Stewart W. Brown NRC/TSB Thomas G. Dunning NRC/TSB David Langford NRC/TSB Bernard Mann NRC/TSB
: v.                                   1 1
 
                                            \
v.
v                                         i l
1 1
i i
\\
j AGENDA STS COORDINATION I
i v
l i
i j
AGENDA STS COORDINATION I
h'ORKING GROUP July 17, 1987 4
h'ORKING GROUP July 17, 1987 4
o NUMARC Interface (Proposed) o Review Industry Program Plan Phase I Phase II o Review Staff Plan i
o NUMARC Interface (Proposed) o Review Industry Program Plan Phase I Phase II o
Review Staff Plan i
l I
l I
I 1
I 1
Line 91: Line 119:
i
i
!4 I
!4 I
I l                                           )
I l
)


  .      4 i
4 g* 8849'o i
      .    +
UNITED STATES
g* 8849'o                             UNITED STATES
+
[     1 ,. j               NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5g'             E                     WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555
[
              *****                            August 12, 1987 PEPORANDUM FOR:   Edward J. Butcher, Chief Technical Specifications Branch t
1,.
Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR THRU:             David C. Fischer, Section Chief Special Projects Section Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR 1
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5g' E
Kulin D. Desai, Reactor Engineer FROM:
WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 August 12, 1987 PEPORANDUM FOR:
Technical Specifications Branch                             i Division of Operational _ Events Assessment, NRR
Edward J. Butcher, Chief Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR t
THRU:
David C. Fischer, Section Chief Special Projects Section Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR 1
FROM:
Kulin D. Desai, Reactor Engineer Technical Specifications Branch i
Division of Operational _ Events Assessment, NRR


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF MEETING WITH NUMARC STS COORDINATION WORKING GROUP i           The NRC Staff and the members of NUMARC STS Coordination Working Group (STSCWG)metonJuly 17, 1987 in Bethesda, Maryland to discus their current t
OF MEETING WITH NUMARC STS COORDINATION WORKING GROUP i
The NRC Staff and the members of NUMARC STS Coordination Working Group (STSCWG)metonJuly 17, 1987 in Bethesda, Maryland to discus their current t
activities ar.d future plans.
activities ar.d future plans.
It appears that STSCWG is active, well organized and focusing on issues         1 similar to those identified in the TSB program plan. The TSB and Industry       )
It appears that STSCWG is active, well organized and focusing on issues 1
program plans are compatible with only minor differences between task
similar to those identified in the TSB program plan. The TSB and Industry
,.;          priorities and schedules. Industry would like to resolve certain policy
)
    .        issues upfront instead of working on these issues in parallel with new STS development as outlined in the TSB program plan. Specifically, Inaustry would like to resolve these policy issues, several human factors issues and get each owners group TS split approved by the NRC by December 31, 1987. Once these key issues are resolved, each owners group will move forward with its phase II program 1.e., development of complete new STS. TSB will adjust the priorities and schedules in its program plan to achieve similar objectives.
program plans are compatible with only minor differences between task priorities and schedules.
Industry would like to resolve certain policy issues upfront instead of working on these issues in parallel with new STS development as outlined in the TSB program plan. Specifically, Inaustry would like to resolve these policy issues, several human factors issues and get each owners group TS split approved by the NRC by December 31, 1987. Once these key issues are resolved, each owners group will move forward with its phase II program 1.e., development of complete new STS. TSB will adjust the priorities and schedules in its program plan to achieve similar objectives.
TSB and STSCWG will work closely to resolve these high priority issues.
TSB and STSCWG will work closely to resolve these high priority issues.
NUPARC will act as an executive body providing broad policy directions to STSCWG. NUPARC will resolve major differences between the owners groups activities. STSCWG will implement the NUMARC directives.
NUPARC will act as an executive body providing broad policy directions to STSCWG. NUPARC will resolve major differences between the owners groups activities. STSCWG will implement the NUMARC directives.
STSWCG outlined the tasks included in their program plan for making Technical Specifications I:nprovements. The activities described in Industry's program plan fit into the following categories according to priority:
STSWCG outlined the tasks included in their program plan for making Technical Specifications I:nprovements. The activities described in Industry's program plan fit into the following categories according to priority:


  . 1 s.
1 s.
Edward J. Butcher                                     August 12, 1987 Category I - Generic Policy Issues
Edward J. Butcher August 12, 1987 Category I - Generic Policy Issues Plant' specific deviations,from new STS TS Bases Content and Details Control of Bases.(i.e., Is NRC approval needed for a change?)
              -    Plant' specific deviations,from new STS TS Bases Content and Details
              -    Control of Bases.(i.e., Is NRC approval needed for a change?)
Sholly issues (Can it be a generic sholly?).
Sholly issues (Can it be a generic sholly?).
Relocation and control of items removed from TS-Regulatoryexemptions(RETS)
Relocation and control of items removed from TS-Regulatoryexemptions(RETS)
                                                                                                  ]
]
STSCWG'will-' develop a common position for each of these generic policy .           ]
STSCWG'will-' develop a common position for each of these generic policy.
issues. They plan to submit their positions to tho staff by September 1987.       :)
]
Category II - Hurran Factors Issues                                               -
issues. They plan to submit their positions to tho staff by September 1987.
Format Organization of LCOs and Surveillance Levelc of details in LCOs Definitions Writing Style
:)
              -    Refueling TS (i.e., where to put them)
Category II - Hurran Factors Issues Format Organization of LCOs and Surveillance Levelc of details in LCOs Definitions Writing Style Refueling TS (i.e., where to put them)
Location of Tabular Information STSCWS is working on these issues and will submit a report addressing them to the staff by November 1987.
Location of Tabular Information STSCWS is working on these issues and will submit a report addressing them to the staff by November 1987.
Category III - TS Split Matrix l           Each vendor owners group will prepare a separate- topical report presenting -
Category III - TS Split Matrix l
l           their TS split findings. STSCWG will prepare an additional topical report l           which will include a TS Split matrix presenting all vendors TS. split results         i l
Each vendor owners group will prepare a separate-topical report presenting -
and justification for differences. Detailed rationale for decisions made by.
l their TS split findings. STSCWG will prepare an additional topical report l
l           each owners group in doing their TS split will be provided in the vendor specific TS split topical report. STSCWG'would like to meet with the staff by the end of September 1987 to discuss the split topical reports. The vendors           ]
which will include a TS Split matrix presenting all vendors TS. split results i
plan to submit all topical reports to the staff for review and would like the         '
l and justification for differences. Detailed rationale for decisions made by.
staff's decision on these topical reports by the end of December 1987..               I i
l each owners group in doing their TS split will be provided in the vendor specific TS split topical report. STSCWG'would like to meet with the staff by the end of September 1987 to discuss the split topical reports. The vendors
Categories IV, V, anc VI - Line Items Improvement                                     )
]
These sections identified activities associated with specific line item               ;
plan to submit all topical reports to the staff for review and would like the staff's decision on these topical reports by the end of December 1987..
improvements (e.g., cycle specific variables).
I i
4           STSCWG is placing highest priority on the first three' category items and is         .
Categories IV, V, anc VI - Line Items Improvement
putting significant effort into completing these items by December 1987, thereby culminating their Phase I programs. phase II programs will' include new STS development.
)
These sections identified activities associated with specific line item improvements (e.g., cycle specific variables).
4 STSCWG is placing highest priority on the first three' category items and is putting significant effort into completing these items by December 1987, thereby culminating their Phase I programs.
phase II programs will' include new STS development.
1 i
1 i
j 4
j l
    ~                                                                                             l
4
_        _          _  -_ a
~
a


Edviard J. Butcher.                                   August 12, 1987       j STSCWG'provided comments on the TSB program plan. Overall, both program plans-   i are in good agreement regarding the general approach for making Technical Specifications ' improvements. However, Industry prefers to resolve the policy issues upfront instead of working on these issues.in parallel with new STS- '
Edviard J. Butcher. August 12, 1987 j
development as outlined in TSB program plan. TSB will adjust the priorities.
STSCWG'provided comments on the TSB program plan. Overall, both program plans-i are in good agreement regarding the general approach for making Technical Specifications ' improvements. However, Industry prefers to resolve the policy issues upfront instead of working on these issues.in parallel with new STS- '
r        and schedules in its Program Plan to be more compatible with those in the Industry plan.
development as outlined in TSB program plan.
TSB will adjust the priorities.
and schedules in its Program Plan to be more compatible with those in the r
Industry plan.
Enclosed is an attendance list and the agenda for.the meeting.
Enclosed is an attendance list and the agenda for.the meeting.
                                                %,rF.3.Dsa               ,
%,rF.3.Dsa Kulin D. Desai, Reactor Engineer
Kulin D. Desai, Reactor Engineer
' Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR-
                                                ' Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR-


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
As stated i
As stated i
cc w/ encl:
cc w/ encl:
,      R. W. Starostecki C. E. Rossi Distribution:
R. W. Starostecki C. E. Rossi Distribution:
TSB R/F 00EA R/F Central Files DCS (016)
TSB R/F 00EA R/F Central Files DCS (016)
PDR EJButcher l       DCFischer CilBerlinger l       WDLanning i       DBrinkman l       SNewberry TCox TSB Members 1
PDR EJButcher l
(MEM0TOBUTCHERFROMDESAI) e_d           3G                                                           ,
DCFischer CilBerlinger l
TSB:00EA:NRR         TSB:DOEA:NRR l
WDLanning i
KDDesai: dim         DCFischer                                                     i 08//f./87           08/11/87 L____                                                                                   J
DBrinkman l
SNewberry TCox TSB Members 1
(MEM0TOBUTCHERFROMDESAI) e_d 3G TSB:00EA:NRR TSB:DOEA:NRR l
KDDesai: dim DCFischer i
08//f./87 08/11/87 L____
J


k.
k.
                            'NRC/NUMARC MEETING JULY 17, 1987 NAME                                 ORGANIZATION         l
'NRC/NUMARC MEETING JULY 17, 1987 NAME ORGANIZATION l
  .        Kulin D. Desai'                         NRC/TSB                         l David C. Fischer.                     NRC/TSB                         1 Edward J. Butcher                     NRC/TSB Richard L. Emch                       NRC/TSB Biff Bradley                           Georgia Power /BWROG             l Ed Lozito                             Virginia Power /WOG Gregg A.-Sinders                       Carolina Power & Light /WOG 1
Kulin D. Desai' NRC/TSB l
Tom Tipton                             NUMARC                           l 1726 M Street N.W.
David C. Fischer.
Suite 903 Washington,-D.C. 20034 202-872-1280
NRC/TSB 1
,          Bob Gill                               Duke Power /B&WOG l
Edward J. Butcher NRC/TSB Richard L. Emch NRC/TSB l
l         Peter Smith                           So. California Edison Company -
Biff Bradley Georgia Power /BWROG Ed Lozito Virginia Power /WOG Gregg A.-Sinders Carolina Power & Light /WOG 1
Stuart Webster                         CE/ANS 58.4 l         Millard Wohl                           NRC/TSB Elinor G. Adensam                     NRC/NRR/PDII                   ;
Tom Tipton NUMARC l
Sam Bryan                             NRC/TSB Calvin W. Moon                         NRC/TSB Stewart W. Brown                       NRC/TSB 1
1726 M Street N.W.
Thomas G. Dunning                     NRC/TSB David Langford                         NRC/TSB                         :
Suite 903 Washington,-D.C.
Bernard Mann                           NRC/TSB 4
20034 202-872-1280 Bob Gill Duke Power /B&WOG l
l Peter Smith So. California Edison Company -
Stuart Webster CE/ANS 58.4 l
Millard Wohl NRC/TSB Elinor G. Adensam NRC/NRR/PDII ;
Sam Bryan NRC/TSB Calvin W. Moon NRC/TSB Stewart W. Brown NRC/TSB 1
Thomas G. Dunning NRC/TSB David Langford NRC/TSB Bernard Mann NRC/TSB 4


e
e A
    .      A l
l 1
l l
AGENDA l
STS COORDINATION
\\
l h'ORKING GROUP i
l July 17, 1987 o
NUMARC Interface (Proposed) i o
Review Industry Program Plan Phase I Phase II l
o Review Staff Plan i
1 l
1 l
l                                AGENDA l                                                                      ,
STS COORDINATION
\
l                            h'ORKING GROUP i
l July 17, 1987 o NUMARC Interface (Proposed) i o Review Industry Program Plan Phase I Phase II l
o Review Staff Plan i                                                                      1 l
J o
J o
e
e
_.______________.._._;}}
_.______________.._._;}}

Latest revision as of 07:09, 2 December 2024

Summary of 870717 Meeting W/Numarc STS Coordination Working Group in Bethesda MD Re Current Activities & Future Plans. Proposed Agenda & List of Attendees Encl
ML20237J171
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/12/1987
From: Desai K
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Butcher E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8708180012
Download: ML20237J171 (10)


Text

$.

b-

..0 9 oreg

.h

'o UNITED STATES.

~,

.[ $e ',g NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7n p

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 l

l August 12, 1987 j

PEMORANDUM FOR: Edward J. Butcher, Chief-I Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR THRU:

David C. Fischer, Section Chief.

l Special Projects Section l

Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR FROM:

Kulin D. Desai,-Reactor Engineer Technical Specifications. Branch.

' Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF MEETING WITH NUMARC STS COORDINATION WORKING GROUP i

The NRC Staff and the members of FUMARC STS Coordination Working Group (STSCWG) met on July 17, 1987 in Bethesda, Maryland to discus.their current i

activities and future plans.

j It appears that STSCWG is active, well organized and focusing on issues j

similar to those identified in the TSB program plan. The TSB and Industry program plans are compatible with only minor differences'between task priorities and schedules'.

Industry would like to resolve certain policy

_~

issues upfront instead of working on these issues in parallel with new STS development as outlined in the TSB program plan. 'Specifically, Industry would like to resolve these policy issues, several human factors issues and a

get each owners group TS split approved by the NRC by December 31, 1987. Once these key issues are resolved, each owners group will move forward with its Phase II program i.e., development of complete new STS. TSB will adjust the 4

priorities and schedules in its program plan to achieve similar objectives.

TSB and STSCWG will work closely to resolve these high priority issues.

1 NUMARC will act as an executive body providing broad policy directions to STSCWG. NUMARC will resolve major differences between the owners groups activities. STSCWG will implement the NUMARC directives.

4 STSWCG outlined the tasks included in their program plan for' making Technical-Specifications Improvements. The activities-described in Industry s program plan fit into the following categories according to priority:

/

pY f

{lb 8708180012 870' 12 PDR ORG NRRA PDR a

r s

Edward J. Butcher August ~12, 1987 Category I - Generic Policy Issues Plant specific deviations from new STS TS Bases Content and Details Control of Bases (i.e., Is NRC approval needed for a change?)

Sholly issues (Can it be a generic sholly?)

Relocation and control of items removed from TS Regulatory exemptions (RETS)

STSCWG will develoo a common position for each of these generic policy issues. They plan to submit their positions to the staff by September 1987.

Category II - Human Factors Issues Fonnat Organization of LCOs and Surveillance Levels of details in LCOs Definitions Writing Style Refueling TS (i.e., where to put them)

Location of Tabular Information STSCWG is working on these issues and will submit a report addressing them to the staff by November 1987.

Category III - TS Split Matrix Each vendor owners group will prepare a separate topical report presenting their TS split findings. STSCWG will prepare an additional topical report which will include a TL Split matrix presenting all vendors TS split results and justification for differences. Detailed rationale for decisions made by l

each owners group in doing their TS split will be provided in the vendor i

specific TS split topical report. STSCWG would like to meet with the staff by the end of September 1987 to discuss the split topical reports..The vendors plan to submit all topical reports to the staff for review and would like the l

staff's decision on these topical reports by the end of December 1987.

Categories IV, V, and VI - Line Items Improvement These sections identified activities associated with specific line item improvements (e.g., cycle specific variables).

STSCWG is placing highest priority on the first three category items and is putting significant effort into completing these items by December 1987, thereby culminating their Phase I programs.

Phase II programs will include new STS development.

i l

i 4

j v

l*.

i j

Edward J. Butcher August 12, 1987 j

STSCWG provided comments on the TSB program plan.

Overall, both program plans I

are in good agreement regarding the general approach for making Technical Specifications improvements. However, Industry prefers to resolve the policy j

issues upfront instead of working on these issues in parallel with new STS j

development as outlined in TSB program plan. TSB will adjust the priorities 1

and schedules in its Program Plan to be more compatible with those in the

_j Industry plan.

I Enclosed is an attendance list and the agenda for the meeting.

J h f h, 3.) f5fM r

Kulin D. Desai, Reactor Engineer Technical Specifications Branch

)

Division of Operational Events j

Assessment, NRR Enclosure-As stated cc w/ enc 1:

I R. W. Starostecki C. E. Rossi l

l Distribution:

l TSB R/F DOEA R/F,.m (Central. Fills,s

_m..

. _LDCSL(016)?))

PDR EJButcher DCFischer CHBerlinger WDLanning DBrinkman SNewberry TCox TSB Members (MEMOTOBUTCHERFROMDESAI)

  1. 3 3G -

TSB:D0EA:NRR TSB:DOEA:NRR KDDesai: dim DCFischer 08//f./87 08/11/87 e

- 4.

O~

\\

NRC/NUMARC MEETING JULY 17, 1987 NAME ORGANIZATION Kulin D. Desai NRC/TSB David C. Fischer NRC/TSB Edward J. Butcher NRC/TSB Richard L. Emch NRC/TSB Biff Bradley Georgia Power /BWROG Ed Lozito Virginia Power /WOG i

Gregg A. Sinders Carolina Power & Light /WOG-

.I Ton Tipton NUMARC-1726 M Street N.W.

Suite 903 l

Washington, D.C.

20034 202-872-1280 Bob Gill Duke Power /B&WOG Peter Smith So, California Edison Company Stuart Webster CE/ANS 58.4 Millard Wohl NRC/TSB Elinor G. Adensam NRC/NRR/PDII-1 Sam Bryan NRC/TSB Calvin W. Moon NRC/TSB Stewart W. Brown NRC/TSB Thomas G. Dunning NRC/TSB David Langford NRC/TSB Bernard Mann NRC/TSB

v.

1 1

\\

i v

l i

i j

AGENDA STS COORDINATION I

h'ORKING GROUP July 17, 1987 4

o NUMARC Interface (Proposed) o Review Industry Program Plan Phase I Phase II o

Review Staff Plan i

l I

I 1

l t

i

!4 I

I l

)

4 g* 8849'o i

UNITED STATES

+

[

1,.

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5g' E

WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 August 12, 1987 PEPORANDUM FOR:

Edward J. Butcher, Chief Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR t

THRU:

David C. Fischer, Section Chief Special Projects Section Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR 1

FROM:

Kulin D. Desai, Reactor Engineer Technical Specifications Branch i

Division of Operational _ Events Assessment, NRR

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF MEETING WITH NUMARC STS COORDINATION WORKING GROUP i

The NRC Staff and the members of NUMARC STS Coordination Working Group (STSCWG)metonJuly 17, 1987 in Bethesda, Maryland to discus their current t

activities ar.d future plans.

It appears that STSCWG is active, well organized and focusing on issues 1

similar to those identified in the TSB program plan. The TSB and Industry

)

program plans are compatible with only minor differences between task priorities and schedules.

Industry would like to resolve certain policy issues upfront instead of working on these issues in parallel with new STS development as outlined in the TSB program plan. Specifically, Inaustry would like to resolve these policy issues, several human factors issues and get each owners group TS split approved by the NRC by December 31, 1987. Once these key issues are resolved, each owners group will move forward with its phase II program 1.e., development of complete new STS. TSB will adjust the priorities and schedules in its program plan to achieve similar objectives.

TSB and STSCWG will work closely to resolve these high priority issues.

NUPARC will act as an executive body providing broad policy directions to STSCWG. NUPARC will resolve major differences between the owners groups activities. STSCWG will implement the NUMARC directives.

STSWCG outlined the tasks included in their program plan for making Technical Specifications I:nprovements. The activities described in Industry's program plan fit into the following categories according to priority:

1 s.

Edward J. Butcher August 12, 1987 Category I - Generic Policy Issues Plant' specific deviations,from new STS TS Bases Content and Details Control of Bases.(i.e., Is NRC approval needed for a change?)

Sholly issues (Can it be a generic sholly?).

Relocation and control of items removed from TS-Regulatoryexemptions(RETS)

]

STSCWG'will-' develop a common position for each of these generic policy.

]

issues. They plan to submit their positions to tho staff by September 1987.

)

Category II - Hurran Factors Issues Format Organization of LCOs and Surveillance Levelc of details in LCOs Definitions Writing Style Refueling TS (i.e., where to put them)

Location of Tabular Information STSCWS is working on these issues and will submit a report addressing them to the staff by November 1987.

Category III - TS Split Matrix l

Each vendor owners group will prepare a separate-topical report presenting -

l their TS split findings. STSCWG will prepare an additional topical report l

which will include a TS Split matrix presenting all vendors TS. split results i

l and justification for differences. Detailed rationale for decisions made by.

l each owners group in doing their TS split will be provided in the vendor specific TS split topical report. STSCWG'would like to meet with the staff by the end of September 1987 to discuss the split topical reports. The vendors

]

plan to submit all topical reports to the staff for review and would like the staff's decision on these topical reports by the end of December 1987..

I i

Categories IV, V, anc VI - Line Items Improvement

)

These sections identified activities associated with specific line item improvements (e.g., cycle specific variables).

4 STSCWG is placing highest priority on the first three' category items and is putting significant effort into completing these items by December 1987, thereby culminating their Phase I programs.

phase II programs will' include new STS development.

1 i

j l

4

~

a

Edviard J. Butcher. August 12, 1987 j

STSCWG'provided comments on the TSB program plan. Overall, both program plans-i are in good agreement regarding the general approach for making Technical Specifications ' improvements. However, Industry prefers to resolve the policy issues upfront instead of working on these issues.in parallel with new STS- '

development as outlined in TSB program plan.

TSB will adjust the priorities.

and schedules in its Program Plan to be more compatible with those in the r

Industry plan.

Enclosed is an attendance list and the agenda for.the meeting.

%,rF.3.Dsa Kulin D. Desai, Reactor Engineer

' Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Events Assessment, NRR-

Enclosure:

As stated i

cc w/ encl:

R. W. Starostecki C. E. Rossi Distribution:

TSB R/F 00EA R/F Central Files DCS (016)

PDR EJButcher l

DCFischer CilBerlinger l

WDLanning i

DBrinkman l

SNewberry TCox TSB Members 1

(MEM0TOBUTCHERFROMDESAI) e_d 3G TSB:00EA:NRR TSB:DOEA:NRR l

KDDesai: dim DCFischer i

08//f./87 08/11/87 L____

J

k.

'NRC/NUMARC MEETING JULY 17, 1987 NAME ORGANIZATION l

Kulin D. Desai' NRC/TSB l

David C. Fischer.

NRC/TSB 1

Edward J. Butcher NRC/TSB Richard L. Emch NRC/TSB l

Biff Bradley Georgia Power /BWROG Ed Lozito Virginia Power /WOG Gregg A.-Sinders Carolina Power & Light /WOG 1

Tom Tipton NUMARC l

1726 M Street N.W.

Suite 903 Washington,-D.C.

20034 202-872-1280 Bob Gill Duke Power /B&WOG l

l Peter Smith So. California Edison Company -

Stuart Webster CE/ANS 58.4 l

Millard Wohl NRC/TSB Elinor G. Adensam NRC/NRR/PDII ;

Sam Bryan NRC/TSB Calvin W. Moon NRC/TSB Stewart W. Brown NRC/TSB 1

Thomas G. Dunning NRC/TSB David Langford NRC/TSB Bernard Mann NRC/TSB 4

e A

l 1

l l

AGENDA l

STS COORDINATION

\\

l h'ORKING GROUP i

l July 17, 1987 o

NUMARC Interface (Proposed) i o

Review Industry Program Plan Phase I Phase II l

o Review Staff Plan i

1 l

J o

e

_.______________.._._;