|
|
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. . | | {{#Wiki_filter:}} |
| g m
| |
| .I ammuseummuun
| |
| ==
| |
| l l
| |
| Log # TXX-89201 i 1 C- File # 10010 ,
| |
| C C Ref. # 10CFR50.34(b)'
| |
| I 1EIELECTRIC May 1, 1989 W.J.Cahm Esecutive Vice l' resident V. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control' Desk ,
| |
| . Washington, D. C. '20555 .
| |
| | |
| ==SUBJECT:==
| |
| COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)
| |
| DOCKET N05. 50-445'AND 50-446 i FSAR AMENDMENT 76' DESCRIPTION
| |
| \-f Gentlemen:
| |
| Amendment 76 of the CPSES FSAR was transmitted to you under a separate cover letter, TXX-89200, dated May 1, 1989.
| |
| Amendment 76 provides updates, revisions,. additions, corrections, p clarifications and editorial changes. A page-by-page description of the t
| |
| changes is attached. -The number in parenthesis following each description f (e.g., (88-399)) is the identification number for the FSAR Change Request (if any) that was used to process that portion of this amendment. The group t number after each FSAR Change Request Identification number assigns a level of significance for each change made to the FSAR as discussed in TV Electric-letter TXX-88467 of June 1, 1988. Pages which do not.have technical changes but.are includ~ed in the amendment (because they are on the opposite side of the sheet from a page that was changed, because a change shifted the existing material to another page or because only editorial changes were made on these
| |
| ! 'pages) are not discussed in the attachment.
| |
| Sincerely, 8:
| |
| William J. Cahill, Jr.
| |
| RSD/vid Attachment c - Mr. R. D. Martin, Region IV Resident Inspectors, CPSES (3) gool dl
| |
| :n 8905170089 890bO PDR ADOCK 050 V K
| |
| 400 North Olive Street LB 81 Dallas, Texas 75201 C____________ ._ _ _ _ _ _
| |
| | |
| Attachment- cto.TXX-89201:
| |
| 'May11,11989-Page.liof 439-CPSES'FSAR AMENDMENT 76 '
| |
| DETAILED DESCRIPTION
| |
| -FSAR Page
| |
| ~(as amended) Description
| |
| , .1.2-12
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies what the Hydrogen Recombiner consist of, pro-vides editorial changer and removes the Hydrogen. Purge System from the safety related Seismic category'I' un-derstanding. This change is consistent with the HPS de-classification described for Appendix 1A(B) page-1A(B)-3.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section:'6.2.4
| |
| 'SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER'section 7.3.1.13 is not consistent as a result of this change since the Hydrogen Purge System is not a backup to the Hydrogen Recombiner System.
| |
| 1.2-27, 28 See Page No(s):29
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Changes to fire supression systems descriptions to reflect existing design Justification:
| |
| The. changes to section 1.2.2.8.6.2 indicated are' required to clarify the design of the fire suppression-systems at CPSES. Also included in this change are design changes'to the fire protection water supply system.
| |
| Fire protection features for the permanent plant auxiliary buildings are not a part of the plant design.
| |
| Therefore, all discussion of the permanent plant auxiliary buildings have been deleted.
| |
| The above changes, as described, will not adversely affect the ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in the event of a fire.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SSER Section: SSER12 9.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ~ Table.1,3-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Updates the table to indicate that the other nuclear facilities have 6 similar Hydrogen Purge System design which have been reviewed and accepted by the NRC. See Appendix 1A(B) page 1A(B)-3 for details on HPS de-classification.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No L------___-.___:_-_____________-._-_-___--.___.__-.--._.___-_ _ _ _ . - . _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - - - _ - . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - . ._____.____.___2
| |
| | |
| . Attachment 'to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 2 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Table 1.3-1 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Reflect GDC-4 application in design comparison table.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revise table to reflect application of " Broad Scope GDC-4". Eliminates postulated pipe rupture and dynamic effects for primary coolant loop and RCS branch lines greater than 10".
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 3.6.1; SSER6 3.6.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes .
| |
| SER 3.6.1.1, SSER 6 & 12 address application of LBB to Main Loop which has been approved by NRC. SSER 17 addresses effects of LBB in civil / structural area where work was ongoing at issuance of SSER 17.
| |
| Table 1.3-2 See Sheet No(s):27
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes statement that chlorine detectors have been added since the PSAR submittal.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Sec 6.4 page 6-19 is not consistent as a result of this change.
| |
| Table 1.3-2 See Sheet No(s):34
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Table for Changes Since PSAR Submittal to reflect that the codes, safety class and seismic classifications of components in Boron Recycle, Liquid Waste and Gaseous Waste Processing Systems have been revised.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes to reflect compliance with the code, code class, safety class and seismic classification require-ments of ANS1/ANS-51.1-1983, Table A-1 for the Boron Recycle System components and the code, code class, Group: 3 Related SER Section: 1.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 1.3-2 See Sheet No(s):34.
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Table for Changes Since PSAR Submittal to reflect that the codes, safety class and seismic classifications of components in the Boron Recycle, Liquid Waste and Gas-eous Waste Processing Systems have been revised.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes to reflect compliance with the code, code class, safety class and seismic classification require-ments of ANSI /ANS-51.1-1983, Table A-1 for the Boron
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 3 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Recycle System components and the code, code class, safety class and seismic classification requirements of Reg. Guide 1.143 Rev. 1, Table 1 for the Liquid and Gaseous Waste Processing Systems' components.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 1.6 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 1.6-1 See Sheet No(s):07
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Changes the NRC approval status of the LOFTRAN and '
| |
| FACTRAN Codes to "A" (Approved).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The LOFTRAN and FACTRAN Codes received generic'NRC approval by letters dated July 29, 1983 and Sept. 30, 1986, respectively.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.1.2 :
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: Yes Section 15.1.2 of the SER needs to be updated to re-flect the Staff's approval of the LOFTRAN AND FACTRAN '
| |
| Codes.
| |
| * Table 1.6-1 See Sheet No(s):09 !
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) !
| |
| Adds to the list of reports " incorporated by reference" in the FSAR, a TV Electric Topical Report RXE-88-101 on steam generator tube rupture analysis. 4 Justification: i TV Electric submitted with TXX-88306, dated March 15, 1988, a steam generator tube rupture analysis topical report which formed the basis for the revisions sub- '
| |
| mitted to FSAR Chapter 15.6.3 with Amendment 70.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 15,4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No ,
| |
| 1A(B)-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) l Declassification of the Hydrogen Purge System (HPS) from ESF, Safety Related, Seismic Category I to Non- ;
| |
| ESF, Non-Safety and Seismic Category II. Specifies exception to Reg Guide 1.7 by de-classifying portions of the HPS which contain filters to Seismic Category II I Justification: '
| |
| The CPSES design utilizes redundant electric hydrogen !
| |
| recombiners as its primary means of combustible gas control following a LOCA. In the unlikely event that the Hydrogen Recombiner System f ails, the Supplementary Hydrogen Purge System can be used to dilute and reduce the hydrogen concentration in the Containment atmo-sphere. The HPS can be used to aid in the cleanup in accordance with Reg. Guide 1.7, but it is not required
| |
| | |
| Attachment' to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 4 of 439 FSAR Page.
| |
| (as amended) Description to operate to perform a safety related function.
| |
| .The design of the HPS meets the intent of Reg. Guide 1.7 as follows: The Reg. Guide states:
| |
| "All water-cooled power reactors should have the in-stalled capability for a controlled purge of the con-tainment atmosphere to aid in cleanup......"
| |
| "It need not be redundant or seismic category 1, except insofar as portions of the system constitute part of the primary containment boundary or contain filters."
| |
| The CPSES design has a redundant HPS and it is all classified as seismic category II except where the piping penetrates the containment which remains safety related, class 2. The CPSES design takes exception to the Reg. Guide by declassifying portions of the HPS which contain filters to seismic category 11. This means that the unit is not required to be functional after a seismic event but it is design to remain in place. This is consistent with the accident scenarios postulated at CPSES. A LOCA is not postulated to occur coincidentally with a seismic event.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No IA(B)-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies RG 1.16 discussion.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The final rule for 10CFR50.73 (48FR33850) dated July 26, 1983 documents that the reporting requirements described in RG 1.16, Rev. 4, Para. C.2 were superseded by 10CFR50.73.
| |
| Group: 4 SER/SSER Impact: No 1A(B)-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Guidance document used as basis for Security programs changed to ANS 3.3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This guidance is more current.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 13; SSER6 13.6 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 1A(B)-16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Clarify the response to Question 421.19 with respect to ,
| |
| Regulatory Guide 1.38. J Justification:
| |
| To clarify the quality assurance n .lods and administrative controls utilized i,t the area of packaging, shipping, receiving, storage, and handling of items during the operations phase, as described in Section 17.2, will comply with the applicable guidance lj
| |
| | |
| l Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 5 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description contained in Regulatory Guide 1.38, Revision 1 (10/'/6).
| |
| TV Electric meets the requirements of ANSI N45.2.2 -
| |
| 1972, as endorsed by this regulatory guide for operation phase activities with the exception noted:
| |
| For handling of items during operation phase, the following codes and standards shall apply.
| |
| ASNI B30.9 - 1971 ANSI B30.2 - 1976 ANSI B30.5 - 1968 This change has been reviewed by TV Electric QA and determined that there is no reduction in commitment.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No 1A(B)-21, 74
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds an additional exception to Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1, and Regulatory Guide 1.140 re: ease of maintenance.
| |
| Justificatica:
| |
| The addition of the exception to Regulatory Guides 1.52 and 1.140 re: ease of maintenance, is ne essary to reflect the CPSES design, which does not maintain the spacing as required by the Regulatory Guides.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section concludes that CPSES is in conformance with Reg Guide 1.52. LDCR SA-89-202 adds an exception to the Reg Guide; this revision may impact the basis for the SER conclusion.
| |
| 1A(B)-22, 23 See Page No(s):24
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises exception to Regulatory Guide 1.52, Part C.5, In-Place Testing Criteria re: ANSI /ASME N509-1980, limitations to quantitative leak testing (QLT) of ductwork.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Quantitative leak testing of ductwork is limited to:
| |
| (1) All Primary Plant Ventilation System ductwork lo-
| |
| :ated above el. 873'-6" designated as Safety Class 3.
| |
| Portions of primary plant ventilation exhaust ductwork were declassified from safety-related to nonsafety; therefore, it is not necessary to test this ductwork, since its functioning is not being taken credit for after a seismic event. This required an exception to <
| |
| ANSI H509 (Sections 4.12, 5.10.8 and Table 4-3), which requires ali ductwork to be quantitatively leak tested.
| |
| (2) All ductwork/ piping of the Hydrogen Purge Air Cleanup System from the outboard containment isolation valves. The ductwork/ piping associated with the hydro-gen purge system requires OLT because it is a filtra-
| |
| | |
| 'LAttachment to TXX-89201 Mayl1,l1989' Page 6 Eof 439
| |
| +
| |
| , ESAR Page
| |
| .(as amended) ' Description.
| |
| tion system. .(3) All ductwork from the fresh air in-take _up to the Emergency Pressurization Units of the.
| |
| Control Room Air Conditioning System. ..The ductwork up-( stream of the filtration units requires'0LT per ANSI .
| |
| N509,- since it must. meet leakage: class.I. criteria.
| |
| However, the.ductwork on the discharge: side of the units provides clean air to a clean area and.only re-quires.a leak test to meet leakage class II criteria.-
| |
| It is not necessary.to invoke the ' ANSI N509 criteria on the discharge side of the units because the filtered' air will.have no adverse,effect on' Control Room habita-bility'. However, a qualitative leak test on'.this' duct-work will be invoked in order to meet minimum air leak-age requirements and facilitate air. balancing. .(4).Alli ductwork related'to the makeup air system,from the-fresh air intakes'up to the isolation dampers of the CRACS. Similar to "3" above; the ductwork downstream from the isolation dampers will be OLT'ed. (5) All' ductwork penetrating the Control Room envelope. This ductwork has the potential to bring in contaminated air through the Centrol Room boundary; therefore, it're-quires OLT. Some of this ductwork has been constructed with welded seams in order to ensure Control. Room habitability requirements are met.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.5.1.
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section 6.5.1 concludes that CPSES is in conform-ance with Reg Guide 1.52. This FSAR change changes an exception to the Reg Guide (ANSI /ASME standard).
| |
| 1A(B)-22,24 See Page No(s):25 and 26
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises exceptions taken to Regulatory Guide 1.52, for sections on: (1) test probes, (2) air flow distribu-tion, and (3) in-place testing, and (4) laboratory testing criteria for activated carbon.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| (1) Test ports are to be provided in lieu of permanent-ly i'nstalled test probes. The permanent probes, called for in Section C.4.d of Reg Guide 1 52, Rev. 1, are a convenience to facilitate the testing of the filters and adsorber and, as such, have no safety function.
| |
| The externally mounted test ports are adequate for con-ducting the in-place testing called for in Reg Guide 1.52; therefore, this design meets the intent of the Reg Guide. (2) The air flow distribution to the HEPA filters and iodine adsorbers are to be tested in-place for uniformity initially and after maintenance affect-ing the flow distribution for all units except the Con-trol Room pressurization units. The intent of the air distribution test is to ensure an equal amount of air
| |
| | |
| ' Att'achment to TXX-89201 May:1, 1989 Page 7'of.439
| |
| .FSAR Page
| |
| '(as amended). Description flow goes through each HEPA filter in an HEPA filter bank. The Control Room pressurization unit only has one HEPA filter; therefore, it is not deemed necessary to perform the air filter distribution' test for this unit. This design complies with the intent of Reg Guide 1.52. .(3) The in-place testing exception.is re-vised to clearly indicate that only the upstream HEPA filter will be tested for in-place testing. . (4) (a) .
| |
| Laboratory testing of activated carbon will be per. ANSI N509- and N510-1980. This change is being made since-it is no longer necessary to test the carbon as de-scribed in ANSI N509-1976. New charcoal was purchased in 1986 and this charcoal can be tested'per ANSI N509-and N510-1980 standards. CPSES will test the used-charcoal to 30 C and 70% RH in lieu.of 80 C and 95% RH, as specified in ASTM D3803. (4)(b) The allowable methyl iodide penetration for 99% efficient units shall be 0.2%. Emergency filtration units are immediately downstream of pressurization units. Though-they have no heaters, they are considered to experience similar air flow conditions, which justifies use of .the 0.2%
| |
| value. The design complies with the Regulatory Guide intent.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section 6.5.1 concludes that CPSES is in conform-ance with Reg Guide 1.52. This FSAR change changes an exception to_the Reg Guide and adds others.
| |
| 1A(B)-40
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Elimination of the Cold Full-Flow and Cold No-Flow rod drop timing tests.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See Justification for T14.2-3 Sheet 19.
| |
| Group: 2 l
| |
| Related SER Section: 14.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 1A(B)-41,.42 See Page No(s):43
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Modification to replace testing conducted at 30's RTP with testing at 50% RTP. Where testing had been pre-viously specified for both 30% and 50% RTP, only the 50% RTP test will be performed.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See Justifications for T14.2-3 Sheets 22, 23 and 33.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 14.2 -
| |
| SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| | |
| !Attachmint a to TXX-89201
| |
| : May 1,1989 p Page 8 of 439 u
| |
| l' FSAR Page (as amended) Description l '1A(B)-47'
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revision.regarding isolation devices used for train-to-train isolation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Electrically, Class 1E. circuits are equal or superior to non-Class 1E circuits. Physically Class-1E circuits are subject to more stringent analysis than non-Class 1E circuits. Therefore, devices qualified
| |
| .for non-Class 1E to Class IE isolation applications provide more than adequate train-to train isolation.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section:-8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes Affects NRC review on separation.
| |
| 1A(B)-47
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Addition regarding separation between Heliax & Radiax radio antenna coaxial cable and Class 1E cable.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Low loss Heliax coaxial antenna lead cable and Radiax radiating coaxial transmission cable used in the plant communication systems are non-Class 1E. The low energy carried by antenna tables is not sufficient to cause internally generated fires in these cables. Therefore, separation between Class 1E (cables) circuits and- these Heliax and Radiax non-Class'1E cables is not required.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER-Section: 8.4.4
| |
| .SER/SSER Impact: Yes Affects current SER review.
| |
| 1A(B)-49
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds separation requirements between associated.
| |
| circuits and non-Class 1E circuits within fire panels.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Based on analysis, separation between certain associated circuits and non-Class 1E circuits within fire panels CPX-EIPRLV-29, -29A, and -30 do not require separation, since the circuits carry low energy fire detection control signals.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4 4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The additional analysis affects the ongoing-NRC review for this Regulatory Guide.
| |
| 1A(B)-59
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises compliance description for RG 1.95 to reference revised FSAR Section 2.2 which eliminates the detailed analysis of onsite chlorine releases.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The service water and circulating water chlorination
| |
| _=_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _______.__________.___________!
| |
| | |
| -Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 9 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description system and other significant amounts of chlorine stored l onsite will be removed and an alternate biocide such as sodium hypochlorite/ sodium bromide will be used. The FSAR Section 2.2.3 for toxic chemicals at CPSES has been revised to delete the detailed analysis of onsite chlorine releases.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 2.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 1A(P)-71
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) ,
| |
| Adds an exception to paragraph C.4 of R.G. 1.124 by !
| |
| increasin level D (g the service faulted) limits for bolts for Service plant conditions.
| |
| 1 Justification:
| |
| The increased allowables are implemented by use of ASME III, Subsection NF, Paragraphs NF-3225 and NF-3324.6 of the 1983 Edition-Summer 1983 Addenda for the design of bolting. These specific code provisions are reviewed and approved by the NRC staff in NUREG-0797, Supplement 14 to the Safety Evaluation Report, Section 4.1.2.2, t page 4-8. !
| |
| Group: 2 Related SSER Section: SSER14 4.1.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 1A(B)-72
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds discussion of how system functional capability is assured as required by Paragraph C.8 of R.G. 1.124. 4 Justification:
| |
| Provides consistency with Appendix 1A(N) of FSAR Section 1.0 by repeating the same information for non-NSSS supplied Class I linear type supports.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.9 SER/SSER Impact: No 1A(B)-77
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Change commitment from Rev.1 of R.G.-l.134 to Rev. 2.
| |
| Justification: l Ensure licensed personnel receive proper medical i evaluation. '
| |
| Group. 3 ;
| |
| Related SER Section; 13.1; SSER12 13.1 l SER/SSER Impact: No 1A(B)-79,80 See Page No(s):81
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises the ' Discussion' section devoted to Regulatory l Guide 1.140 in its entirety to indicate the exceptions taken for the CPSES non-ESF filtration units.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| | |
| Attachment- to TXX-89201
| |
| :May-1, 1989' 4; Page 10 of 439
| |
| ;- l
| |
| 'FSAR Page, (as amended) Description -]
| |
| This section is being revised to indicate the excep -
| |
| tions taken undsr Reg Guide 1.140. (1) The permanent prcbes are a convenience to facilitate the testing of the. filters and adsorber and, as such, have no safety function. The externally mounted test ports are ade-
| |
| 'quate for conducting the in-place testing called for in the Reg Guide; therefore, this design meets'the intent of the Reg Guide. (2) The intent of the air distribu-tion test is to ensure an equal amount of air flow goes l through each.HEPA filter in an HEPA filter bank. . The hydrogen purge unit only has one HEPA filter; there-fore, it is not necessary.to perform the air filter distribution test for this unit. This design complies with the intent of'the Reg Guide. (3) The In-Place-Testing Criteria section was revised to indicate that only the in-place testing of the upstream HEPA filter will be conducted. (4) It is no lo'nger necessary to test the carbon as described in ANSI N509-1976. New charcoal was purchased in 1986 and this charcoal can be tested as described in the ANSI N509- and N510-1980 standards. CPSES will test the used charcoal to 30 C and 95% RH in lieu of 80 C at 95% RH as specified in ASTM D3803. The allowable methyl iodide penetration for these units shall be 105 as shown in Table 2 of the Reg Guide. This design conforms to the intent of Regulatory Guide 1.140. (03/78)
| |
| Related SER Sections: 9.4.2, 9.4.3 and 9.4.4. ,
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4.2-4 SER/SSER Impact: No 1A(B)-82.
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds statement of compliance with Reg. Guide 1.143 Rev.
| |
| 1, Tablo 1 for the Liquid and Gaseous Waste Processing Systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes to reflect compliance with the code, code class, safety class and seismic classification require-ments of ANSI /ANS-51.1-1983, Table A-1 for the Boron Recycle System components and the code, code class, ,
| |
| safety class and seismic classification requirements of !
| |
| Reg. Guide 1.143 Rev.1, Table _1 for the Liquid and Gas-eous Waste Processing Systems' components.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No 1A(B)-83
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Exempts national & state calibration sourcu , and NAIA from the external audit requirements.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To revise the exemption to Regulatory Guide 1.144, Revision 1. September 1980, paragraph C.3b, " External i
| |
| | |
| m i:
| |
| . Attachments to TXX-89201 m May. '1, ~ 1989.
| |
| '!Page 11 of 439'
| |
| 'FSAR Page .
| |
| (as amended) Description Audits," by indicating that national & state
| |
| , '. calibration sources, and NAIA are not audited by
| |
| .TV. Electric and are exempt from the requirements of.
| |
| . this regulatory guide.-
| |
| Group: 3 ..
| |
| Related SER Section: T17.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 1A(N)-53,54
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| -(Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises discussion of CPSES position on' Reg Guide 1.99 to indicate compliance with Rev 2 of this guide.
| |
| Previous discussions on Rev 1 of the guide have been removed from this section although an advance copy of.
| |
| this change indicated that it would remain as a matter'
| |
| .of historical record.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section::5.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 2.1-2, 2A See Sheet No(s):2B and 2C.
| |
| Description; (Update)
| |
| Updates Figures to accurately depict site area and its facilities.
| |
| Justification: .
| |
| Updates Figures to' delete the visitor overlook'and add the CPSES recreational facility, Squaw Creek Park and the new location of the Backup Meteorological Tower to provide consistency between text and figures.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 2.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes Figures 2.2 and 2.3 may need to be updated to delete the visitor overlook and add the CPSES recreational facility, Squaw Creek Park and the new location of the Backup Meteorological Tower.
| |
| 2.2-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Removes analysis of chlorine as a toxic chemical since significant amounts will not be stored on site.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See Justification for p. 1A(B)-59. Revises description ,
| |
| to state that toxic chemicals which are stored and used onsite are evaluated in accordance with the criteria and guidance of RG 1.78 and NUREG 0570.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 2.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 4
| |
| - - _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ - _ - .-_-__-____---___a
| |
| | |
| p -
| |
| a.
| |
| ym Attachment ~ to TXX-89201
| |
| ~May-1;'1989 Page 12 of 439 L , FSAR Page D
| |
| '(as amended) Description 2.2-7, 10 See Page No(s):11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision).
| |
| Removes analysis.of chlorine as a toxic chemical since significant amounts will not be stored on site.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| , See Justification for p. 2.2-6.
| |
| Group:~2 Related SER Section: 2.2.2.
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No 2.3-33
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) ,
| |
| Correction to the discussion of data storage capability under the operations meteorological measurements program, to reflect actual plant capabilities.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Data is not automatically stored for an 8- month period, but can be operator set to store up to 8 months-worth of data.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No !
| |
| Table 2.3-34
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) ..
| |
| Revises calibration range for Delta Temperature.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises calibration range for Delta Temperature Trom
| |
| " 5 to +5" to "-5 to +15" to eliminate rollover problems in recording instruments and to ensure valid !
| |
| meteorological' data collection.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Ssction: .23 >
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 2'.3-12
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Updates Figure to accurately depict site area and its facilities.
| |
| Justification: 1
| |
| 'See Justification for Figures 2.1-2, -2A,.-2B and 2C.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 2.3 SER/5SER Impact: No 2.4-36
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises method currently described for annual Service ;
| |
| Water Intake Channel Sedimentation measurements.
| |
| Justification: l Revises the method described for the annual service water intake channel sedimentation measurements to allow for direct measurement of sediment depth at a minimum of five location in lieu of detennining the elevation at the bottom of the intake channel at three locations.
| |
| ,i
| |
| | |
| TAttachment'2.to TXX-89201
| |
| 'Mayl1, 1989 (Pags13of439-
| |
| ' FSAR Page (as amended) ' Description Group:'3 Related SSER Section: SSER1 2.4.8 j SER/SSER Impact: Yes SSER1 2.4.8 should be revised to indicate'that the
| |
| -ins'pection will consist of direct measurement of sediment depth at.the bottom of the intake channel at a minimum of five locations along-its length'.
| |
| Figure 2.4-15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Figure 2.4-15 did not accurately'show the location of the Meteorological Tower. Since Figure 2.4-15 deals primarily with the Safe Shutdown In)poundment and the Primary and Backup Meteorological Towers are accurately de'icted p in the Figure 2 1-2 series, the Meteorological Tower location was deleted from Figure 2.4-15.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section:-2.4.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 2.5-202
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Updates description of SSI Dam inspection to indicate that results will be e'valuateu for a5rermal changes from the trend.or baseline.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Updates description of.SSI Dam-inspection to indicate that the inspection results will evaluated for abnormal changes from the trend or baseline in lieu of'to the design criteria. The evaluation for abnormal trends is-consistent with the requirements of RG 1.127, Rev. 1.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 2.5.6.7 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.1-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Changes to fire supression systems descriptions to reflect existing design Justification:
| |
| The changes to section 3.1.1.3 clarify 'he existing design of the fire suppression system', at CPSES.
| |
| The above changes, as described, will not adversely affect the ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in the event of a fire.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SSER Section: SSER12 9.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.1-5, 6 See Page No(s):06a
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revise GDC-4 quote and discussion to reflect current version.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| | |
| L i s . Att_achment, fto TXX-89201 May 1,'1989-1 PegeLI4lof 439 o
| |
| : FSAR Page J(as acended) Description Revise GDC-4 quotation and discussion to' reflect t.he-scope and application in the design bases.
| |
| l.DCR SA-89-230.1 (Table 1.3-1) includes discussion ~of
| |
| .possible SER inconsistencies.
| |
| Group: 2 L Related SER Section:'3'.6.1; SSER6 3.6.1.1
| |
| .SER/SSER Impact: No D 3.1-20
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) l , Removal of chlorine detectors.
| |
| L . Justification:
| |
| Rewords the GDC 19 discussion to remove reference to '
| |
| control room chlorine detectors. . This change is consistent with the revision in Appendix 1A(B). See discussion provided for page 1A(B)-55.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section 6.4 page 6-19 is inconsistent as a result
| |
| , of this change.
| |
| 3.1-30
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| ' Updates the description of the Radiation Surveillance.
| |
| Program and corrects the ASTM year in accordance with 10CFR50. App H. An advance copy of this change was transmitted to the NRC via letter TXX-88882, 12/30/88.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.3.1.2; SSER1 5.3.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER 5.3.1.2 page 5-10, 11, & 13 is not consistent as a j result of this update per Appendix H of 10 CFR Part 50 .
| |
| for the ASTM year.
| |
| 3.2-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) 4 Updated the text to address seismic Category I system.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To update the text to address seismic Category I j mechanical system " Post Accident Sample System," which j was inadvertently omitted. <
| |
| Group: 3 i Related SER Section: 3.2 & 17 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| 3_. 2-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Updated the text to address seismic Category II systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To update the text to address seismic Category.11 mechanical systems " Process Sampling System," " Post Accident Sample System," and " Secondary Sampling System," because all or portions of the system or
| |
| | |
| ,iF
| |
| },
| |
| iAttachment' to TXX-89201 1 May l',1989, Page 15 of 439. ;
| |
| FSAR Page
| |
| -(as' amended) Description components are seismic. Category II. These systems were inadvertently omitted from the text.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No j t
| |
| '3.2-6, 15 .
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Identi fi.es those portions of Boron Recycle, Liquid Waste and Gaseous Waste Systems that have changed clas-sification to seismic category 2 and adds API-650 and AWWA D-1~00 to list of quality standard references.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes to reflect compliance with the code. code >
| |
| class, safety class and seismic classification require- 1 ments of ANSI /ANS-51.1-1983, Table A-1 for the Boron Recycle System components and the. code, code class,.
| |
| safety class and seismic classification requirements of Reg. Guide 1.143 Rev. 1, Table 1 for the Liquid and Gaseous Waste Processing Systems' components. ,
| |
| Group: 2 ,
| |
| 1 Related SER Section: 3.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ' Table 3,2-1 See Sheet No(s):01 and 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds standard AWWA 0-100 to NNS class atmospheric stor-age tanks as an applicable reference standard. Adds'en-try to show 0-15 psig NNS tanks will comply to API-650.
| |
| Corrects notes to reflect the two standards references that have been added.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes to reflect compliance with the code, code class, safety class and seismic classification require-ments of ANSI /ANS-51.1-1983, Table A-1 for the Boron Recycle System components and the code, code class,
| |
| : r. safety class and seismic classification requirements'of Reg. Guide 1.143 Rev. 1, Table 1 for the Liquid and Gaseous Waste Processing Systems' components.
| |
| Group: 3 L' Related SER Section: 3.2.2 l
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 3.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Figure 3.2-1, is being revised to reflect current mechancial system flow diagrams, notes and symbols.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To revise the figure to add the following mechancial symbols and notes: valve body type (DIVERTER VALVE),
| |
| valve accessories, definitions and abbreviations (notes 22 through 25 to valve positions L.C.-2, L.0., & S.O.),
| |
| pipe & equipment accessories (CLASS 1 TO CLASS 2 FLOW L .
| |
| L __
| |
| | |
| i LAttachment to TXX-'89201-May 1,.1989' Page 16;of: 439
| |
| .FSAR Page (as amended).- Description RESTRICTOR SPECIAL BRANCH CONNECTION), instrumentation
| |
| & control symbols (D-DENSITY), line symobls:(EH-TURBINE CONTROL FLVID, LO-TURBINE LUBE OIL, S0-GENERATOR SEAL OIL, WS-TURBINE WATER SPRAY), and notes 22 through 25. Clarified the information for classifications and note.21. Corrected the valve locations number identification system by removing the dash between the unit and system designation.
| |
| . Group: 3-Related SER Section: 3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No- -j i
| |
| 3.5-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) i Revision to the missile program.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Reflects expanded scope of the missile program to include additional types of equipment'with suff# Hnt -
| |
| stored energy to potentially generate a missile.
| |
| G.oup: 3 Related SER Section: 3.1.1; SSER3 3.5.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.5-2, 3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revision to the missile program.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Reflects the purpose of the missile program to assure that essential eauipment train required to support safe shutdown is not adversely affected by postulated missile sources.
| |
| Group: 2.
| |
| Related SER Section: 3.1.1; SSER17 4.5.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Missile generation by Westinghouse suppplied valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Omit consideration of missiles generated due to failure 1
| |
| of Westinghouse valves as the missile evaluation program has demonstrated that missile generation from Westinghouse valves is not credible.
| |
| l Group: 2 l Related SER Section: 3.1.1; SSER17 4.5.1.2 f SER/SSER Impact: No L
| |
| 1 3.5-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Missile generation by Westinghouse supplied pumps.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Omit consideration of missiles generated due to failure of Westinghouse supplied pumps as the missile evaluation has demonstrated that missile generation from Westinghouse supplied pumps is not credible.
| |
| Groun: 2
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 17 of 439 FSAR Page ,.
| |
| .(as amended) Description i Related SER Section: 3.1.1; SSER17 4.5.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.5-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletes Table 3.5-9 and references thereto. Limiting i scope of BOP valves as missile generators to only those in high energy systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| FSAR table lacks explicit information and is better maintained in documentation at the implementing level due to its extensiveness. Limiting the scope of BOP valves to be considered reflects missile program criteria.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 3.5.1.2; SSER17 4.5.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| 3.5-11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Expansion of missiles postulated from BOP equipment is changed from only failed pumps or HVAC equipment to consider any potential source containing high stored energy.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This change in scope is made to reflect the criteria of the missile generation program.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 3.5.1.2; SSER17 4.5.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| Table 3.5-6 See Sheet No(s):01 and 12
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Delete containment cooling, neutron detector well cooling, and process filtration units as credible sources of missile generation.
| |
| , Justification:
| |
| The elimination of this equipment is justified by satisfying program implementation criteria to be considered as non-credible sources of .
| |
| missile generation.
| |
| l Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.5.1.2; SSER17 4.5.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.68-8, 79 '
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Reflects the version of the computer code used to model the effects of HELBs.
| |
| Refer also to SSER(17) 4.5.1.2, 4.5.2.1 and 4.5.3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The effects of high energy line breaks computed by MODIA establish the environmental design basis for safety-related areas and equipment outside containment that are needed for safe shutdown of the plant.
| |
| | |
| : +;; ~
| |
| . Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| -May-1, 1989. .
| |
| Page:18 of.439 FSAR Page (as amended)- Description Group: 2 _
| |
| Related SER Section: 3.6.2; SSER6 3.6.2.2 .
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No 3.6B-17
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Leak-Before-Break and GDC-4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Incorporate discussion of GDC-4 with respect to RCS main loop and branch line piping as part of Unit 1 design basis.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.1; SSER6 3.6.1.1 SER/SSER impact: Yes Refer to LDCR SA-89-230.1 evaluation.
| |
| 3.68-33,'79
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)-
| |
| Changes reference to most recent applicable ANSI standard.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change reference from " ANSI Draft" to " ANSI /ANS-58.2-1988". New ANSI standard incorporates corrections in evaluating jet impingement loads.
| |
| Refer also to SSER'(6) 3.6.2.3 Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.2; :SER17 4.5.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.68-34
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Add NUREG/CR-2913 to list of_ references.
| |
| Group: 4 Related-SER Section: 3.6.2; SSER17 4'.5.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.68-35' 36 , See Page No(s):40 thru 43, Fig 3.68-960 and 96E
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) l Revise discussion and equations which assess effects of Category 1, II, and III jets.
| |
| Refer also to SSER (6) 3.6.2.3 Justification:
| |
| 1 Discussion and equations which are used to assess the q effects of Category I, II, and III jets are revised for 4 clarity and to incorporate application of NUREG/CR-2913 and correction for revised ANSI /ANS-58.2-1988 models. L Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.2; SSER17 4.5.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| l l
| |
| l
| |
| __ - - - - - - - i
| |
| | |
| l l Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1,.1989 Page 19 of 439.
| |
| FSAR Page j (as amended) Description 3.68-51, 52
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Leak-Before-Break and GDC-4.
| |
| ; Justification:
| |
| l Incorporates details of RCS Leak-Before-Break l implementation into CPSES design baisis in accordance l with GDC-4 " broad scope" applications.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.1; SSER6 3.6.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes.
| |
| Refer to LDCR SA-89-230.1 evaluation.
| |
| 3.68-58
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Turbine Building Feedwater line material specification.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Correct non-nuclear piping material specification to ASTM instead of ASME.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 3.9.3.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.68-61
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Moderate Energy Turbine Driven AFW Pump.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revise AFW syitem description to address turbine driven AFW pump moderate energy piping classification due to limitations placed on pump use.
| |
| Refer also to SSER (17) 4.5.3.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.2; SSER17 4.5.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.68-63
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Additional information on fluid jet characteristics as a function of their location is provided.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The resultant pressure and temperature as a result of breaks downstream of the AFW check valves are less severe than the resultant pressures and temperatures from the analysis of the non-mechanistic one square foot break of the feedwater piping located in the same area.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.2; SSER17 4.5.1.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 3.68-63
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Auxiliary Steam Piping material specification. 1 Justification:
| |
| Correction to the type of piping used by the Auxiliary Steam System. ,
| |
| Group: 4 1 Related SER Section: 3.6.2; SSER17 4.5.1.2
| |
| | |
| Attachment'. to TXX-89201
| |
| 'May 1, 1989 Page 20 of 439.'
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description SER/SSER Impact: No 3.6B-67
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)-
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change reference to Steam Generator Blowdown Cleanup System pipe rupture figures due to the elimination of Figures 3.6B-46 and.3.6B-47 by LDCR SA-89-196.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 3.6.2; SSER17 4.5.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.68-68
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| : l. Justification:
| |
| l Revise discussion of environmental analysis of a' break in the Steam Generator Blowdown System and the design features that mitigate the resulting consequences.
| |
| Refer also to'SSER(17) 4.5.3.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.2; SSER17 4.5.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 3.6B-1 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 62 i
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) .
| |
| High Energy Line List--conditions at time of break.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| High Energy Line List columns, " Conditions 0 Time of
| |
| . Break" is deleted and~ replaced with Note 35. The note provides the basis for establishing conditions of a HELB, if one is required to be postulated. This allows the list to be maintained as solely a "High Energy Line List", Pipe break. criteria does not in every instance require that a HELB be postulated if the stress and usage factor allowables are not exceeded.
| |
| Group: 2 j Related SER Section: 3.6.2; SSER6 3.6.2.2 '
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Table 3.68-1 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 62
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Corrections and updates to High Energy Line List.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Table is corrected to include lines whose operating condition satisfies the high energy line classification i criteria, elimination of lines that operate within the moderate energy limits, line number corrections, corrections to corresponding Remarks, reference to applicable Notes and and corrections made to Notes.
| |
| Group: 2 ,
| |
| Related SER Section: 3.6.2; SSER17 4.5.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment. to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989' Page 21 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Table 3.68-2, 3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Leak-Before-Break and GDC-4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| l Tables are revised to reflect the current primary coolant loop design basis for the remaining postulated.
| |
| break locations and LBB applications (i.e. consideration of dynamic effects )
| |
| Group: 2 l
| |
| Related SER Section: 3.6.1; SSER6 3.6.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes See I.DCR SA-89-230.1 for evaluation.
| |
| Figure 3.68-9, 89 See Sheet No(s):90, 91, and 92
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Leak-Before-Break and GDC-4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Figures are revised to reflect the current primary coolant loop design basis for the remaining postulated break locations and LBB applications (i.e. consideration of dynamic effects )
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.1; SSER6 3.6.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes See LDCR SA-89-230.1 for evaluation.
| |
| Figure 3.6B-11, 12 See Sheet No(s):13 thru 25 and 27 thru 32
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Update figures with new pipe break locations.
| |
| Delete Figures 3.68-46, 47, 76, 77.
| |
| See Elso F3.68-34 thru 72, 74, 88, 95.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revised piping stress calculations and application of leak before break analysis are reflected in revised /
| |
| deleted figures.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.1; SSER12 3.6 SER/SSER Impact: No SSER requires revision to incorporate the application of broad scope GDC-4, Leak-Before-Break, to RCS branch lines (i.e., RHR, Accumulator and Surge lines).
| |
| Figure 3.6B-94
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Replaces Figure 10.20-1. See justification under Q&R 010.20-29.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.2; SSER6 3.6.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 3 'May 1, 1989 Page 22 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description 3.7N-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revise text to be consistent with previously revised Table 3.7N-1 (Amend 61),
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds reference to Table 3,7N-1 and the use of Code Case N-411 damping values for primary coolant loop piping systems and equipment.
| |
| Group: 2 .
| |
| Related SER Section: 3.6.1; SSER14 4.1.2.2 l SER/SSER Impact: No 3.7B-4 De:cription: (Revision) l Delete paragraph describing application of Code Case l N-411. 4 Justification:
| |
| RCS Loop Piping is re-analyzed using N-411 damping values. The scope of the NSSS piping analysis is more accurately discussed in Section 3.7N.1.3.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.1; SSER17 4.1.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.8-71
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the location of one of the triaxial peak accelerographs from the steam generator to the pressurizer.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| R.G. 1.12 states that one triaxial peak accelerograph should be located on selected reactor equipment. The pressurizer is a more appropriate reactor equipment item as it is located on the primary coolant loop whereas a steam generator contains both the primary and secondary cooling loops.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 3.7.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.8-72
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Updates the use of ANSI /ANS 56.8-1987 for ma"s-point method during containment leakrate testing.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Previously the 1981 version cf ANSI 56.8 was used.
| |
| However, the 1987 version was recently approved for general use in ).0CFR50 Appendix J. The FSAR is updated to use this version.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.5; dSER12 6.2.5 ;
| |
| | |
| I i
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 23 of 439 ;
| |
| FSAR Page ,
| |
| (as amended) Description SER/SSER Impact: Yes SSER 12 references ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981. )
| |
| 3 8-82, 83
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correctica)
| |
| Corrects the AWS code applicability dates for structural welded construction and prequalified joint details and base metals.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The FSAR invokes the 1969 AISC Specification inluding supplements 1,2,&3. Supplement 3 incorporates the provisions of AWS D1.1-Rev1-73 for structural welding and prequalified joint details. AWS D1.1-75 imposes greater control on workmanship, welding technique and weld joint qualification than AWS D1.1-Rev.1-73. In addition, AWS D1.1-75 is compatible with the 1969 AISC Spec & supplements 1,2 & 3, thus their use for design and construction welding activities is acceptable. The prequalified joint details and base metals contained in AWS D1.1-88 envelope those contained in AWS D1.1-75.
| |
| The requirement for prequalified joint details and base metals contained in AWS D1.1-88 are compatible with the 1969 AISC Spec and supplement 1,2,&3. It is noted that AWS D1.1 allows use of procedures pualified to a previous code year and do not require re-qualification to current edition of the code.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.8.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes SER 3.8.2 does not reference AISC Spec or supplements.
| |
| SER 3.8.3 does reference AICS Spec but not supplements.
| |
| Both may be revised to reflect the current FSAR applicable codes. However, Section 3.8.2 would not be incorrect if left unchanged.
| |
| 3.8-134
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Adds references to support changes made in text.
| |
| See pages 3.8-82 & 83 (#89-959.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds references to support changes made in text.
| |
| See pages 3.8-82 & 83, #89-959.1).
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 3.8.2 SER/SSER Impact: No l 3.9N-28
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Correct table number from 3.6B-3 to 3.9N-21.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 3.6.1; SSER6 3.6.1.1 i
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| b iAttachment- -to TXX-89201 -
| |
| May71,'1989 ~
| |
| Page 24 of 439 4
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description L3.9N-29
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)~
| |
| Incorporates the use of Code Case N-411 and LBB. .
| |
| e Justification:
| |
| < Reflects the RCS break locations and LBB applications as well as the use of Code Case N-411 damping used in the analysis of the reactor coolant loop supports for OBE and'SSE seismic analysis.
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| , Related SER Section: 3.6.1; SSER14 4.1.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No r
| |
| -3.9N-34,'36 See Page No(s):52 and 119
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Leak-Before-Break and GDC-4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Incorporates details of RCS Leak-Before-Break implementation into CPSES design baisis~in accordance with GDC-4 " broad scope" applications.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.1; SSER6 3.6.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes See LDCR SA-89-230.1 evaluation.
| |
| Table 3.9N-8 See Sheet.No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change note to reference Table 3.9N-8 which provides load combinations for ASME Code Class 2 & 3 components and component supports.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 3.9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No T6ble 3.9N-10 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Add three 3" globe valves to NSSS active valve list for RCS.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The three valves (PORVs and PORV block valves) are used to mitigate the consequences of a Steam Generator Tube Rupture event. This is an active function for which the valves are qualified.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 5.2.2; SSER1 5.2.2 L SER/SSER Impact: Yes LDCR SA-88-870 addresses the resolution of conflicts concerning the SGTR event. Current IST program is consistent with active classification of these valves.
| |
| | |
| t 1IAttachment to TXX-89201'
| |
| .May; 1, ' 1989 :
| |
| ,Page 25 of:439:
| |
| FSAR Page--
| |
| (as amended) Description
| |
| ' Table 3.9N-12, 13 See Sheet No(s):14 thru 19 and 21
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)-
| |
| Leak-Before-Break and GDC-4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Incorporates results of Reator Coolant Loop piping support stress, displacements and details pertaining to the implementation of LBB in RCL design basis.
| |
| Refer also to SSER(17) 4.1.2.1 and 4.1.2.3 ;
| |
| Group: 2 1 Related SER Section: 3.6.1; .SSER6 3.6.1.1 !
| |
| SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| ?
| |
| 3.9B
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) !
| |
| Deletion of the turbine trip from 50% RTP for Main I Steam System dynamic response testing.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| RG-1,68 Appendix A, paragraphs 5.1.1.and 5.n.n relate: -
| |
| to the_ dynamic response of the plant following a tur . ,,
| |
| bine trip at 100% RIP. Paragraph 5.o.o relates to the !
| |
| verification by observations and measurements, as i appropriate, that certain piping and component move-3 .ments, vibrations, and expans ons are acceptable.
| |
| RG-1.68 does not require any 50% RTP trip to meet the -!
| |
| requirements for any of the above noted paragraphs. ;
| |
| FSAR Section 3.99.2.1.2 states that the purpose of the '
| |
| dynamic. transient response testing for the specified piping system is to ensure that severe vibrations do not exist. The testing acceptance criteria for dynamic transients is based on the allowable design stress .;
| |
| l limits.for occasional loads such that the induced stresses do not exceed the allowable stresses. An i evaluation performed by the A/E has concluded that the ;
| |
| test at 50% provides little or no new information re-I garding the Main Steam System response to a turbine trip when considering the commitment to perform measur- ,
| |
| ements during 100% RTP trip. Specifically, the 100%- 1 L RTP trip' bounds the 50% RTP trip.
| |
| i Step and ramp load changes occur during the power as-cension as part of the normal oeration, therefore any !
| |
| adverse behavior of the Main Steam System would be observed. ;
| |
| l Group: 2 j Related SER Section: 14 1 SER/SSER Impact: No l l
| |
| 3.98-36
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Feedwater check valve operability.
| |
| Justification: ,
| |
| Description is added of the stress analysis which )
| |
| demonstrates that feedwater check valves are operable in the severe loading condition present following a postulated feedwater line rupture.
| |
| 1 l
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 Maytl', 1989 i
| |
| _Page 26 of 439' L
| |
| 'FSAR Page
| |
| '(as amended)'- Description Group: 2 i
| |
| Related SER Section: 3.9.3.2; SSER19 4.2.3 SER/SSER Impact:'No 3.98-37 .
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)'
| |
| Change " seismic" to " seismic / dynamic" to clarify the o
| |
| , purpose of the qualification.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Aad " dynamic" in two places to clarify the purpose of performing.the described qualification to demonstrate operability for the active valve associated seismic /
| |
| dynamic event, which can be termed " dynamic".
| |
| Group: 4 i Related SER Section: 3.9.3.2; SSER19'4.2.3 ;
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No ;
| |
| 1 Table 3.9B-1A See Sheet No(s):02 )
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) '
| |
| Clarify Note 4 of table. l Justification: 1 Reference Section 3.6 which delineates the conditions l under which pipe rupture must be considered ~. Avoids i possible misinterpretation that pipe rupture is always' j considered. l Group: 4 J Related SER Section: 3.6.182; SSER19 4.2.1 i SER/SSER Impact: No Table 3.98-7 SeeSheetNo(s):04 I
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition).
| |
| Reflect Diesel Generator Fuel Oil. Transfer System relief valves in Table 3.9B-7 since they are classified ASME III, Class 3 Seismic Category 1. ,
| |
| Justification: 1 Reflect Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Transfer System l relief "alves in Table 3.98-7 since they are classified j ASME III, Class 3 Seismic Category I. This change was i previously made in Section 9.5.4.3 and reviewed as documented in SER 9.5.4.3.
| |
| Group: 3 !
| |
| Related SER Section: 3.9.3.3 !
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Table 3.98-10 SeeSheetNo(s):06
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Add condensate storage tank fill line check valve to active valve list.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Failure of the Condensate Storage Tank Fill line check valve could cause loss of CST level. It is therefore added to the active valve list.
| |
| Group: 3 1
| |
| _ _.____-._____ _ ________ . _ _ _ J
| |
| | |
| MT , _ Attachment 'to TXX-89201
| |
| ~ Mays 1", 1989' Page!27_ of; 439.'
| |
| FSAR Page (as. amended). Description L
| |
| ~
| |
| Related SER Section: 10.4.9.1; SSER17 4.4.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: No-
| |
| [ Table 3.98-10 LSee Sheet No(s):14-Descriptio'n: (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Correct component cooling water va'Ives " normal position" in table.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| .Related SER Section: 3.9.3.2 i
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Table 3.98-10 See Sheet No(s):15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Delete valves from the active valve list.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Valves HV-4663 A/B no longer have an active function and are therefore deleted from the active valve list.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 3.9.3.2; SSER1 3.9.6 o SER/SSER Impact: No Table 3.98-10 See Sheet No(s):16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletes Station' Service Water Pump recirculation valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes Station Service Water Pumpi(SSW) recirculation line control valves PV-4252 and PV-4253 from' table.
| |
| The SSW valves, associated piping, and orifices are being removed. Mini-flow recirculation is not normally-provided for once-thru systems and is not required for i the SSW System to perform its intended design' function.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER states that recirculation loops are provided around the SSW. pumps for testing. Pump. testing can still be performed without the recirculation lines. This is consistent with FSAR Change Request 89-414.4.
| |
| Table 3.98-10 See Sheet No(s):16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) l Add condenser auto pressure control valves to active valve list.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Auto pressure control valves provide an active function to support A/C condenser operation.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 3.9.3.2; SSERI 3.9.6 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| I Attachment 't'o TXX-89201
| |
| , -May~1, 1989 Page 28 of-439-FSAR'Page (as amended) Description Table 3,98-10 See' Sheet No(s):17
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Add vacuum relief valves to list of active valves.
| |
| ~
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Vacuum- relief valves are used to mitigate water hammer
| |
| .in the. Service Water System and are therefore incorporated into the active valve list.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.2.1; SSER17 4.4.1.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 3.98-10 See Sheet No(s):18 and 24
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Add reactor makeup water storage tank check valves to list of active valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Reactor makeup water storage tank check valves perform an active function in assuring water level is not affected by failure of NNS piping at the NNS/ Safety Class 3 interface.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 3.9.6; SSER1 3.9.6 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 3.9B-10 See Sheet No(s):20
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Add three valves to active-valve list.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These valves provide pressure relief during containment
| |
| . isolation to assure containment isolation is maintained Table is rev.ised to reflect the change in relief valve tag number.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SEft Section: 3.9.6; SSER12 3.9.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.108-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Removes reference to gas chlorination system and re-places it with a sodium hypochlorite and sodium bromide addition system for the circulating and service water systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The gas chlorine detectors are removed from the control room air intakes.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.10; SSER01 3.10 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 29 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description
| |
| -3.108-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes text to reflect that the Auxiliary Feedwater turbine local control panel is non-seismic and non-1E thus changing the previous commitment to qualify the panel.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See justification on page 10.4-87 (#89-283.2)
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.9.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes 3.118-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarification that Section 3.68.1.2.3 addresses environmental qualification of equipment outside containment affected by a HELB.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SSER Section: SSER6 3.6.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.11B-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction of the definition for a potentially harsh environment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Correction of the definition for a potentially harsh environment. The definition was incorrectly stated in that a potentially harsh environment is an environment due to the direct effects of a DBA which results in any of the parameters listed in the FSAR text. It is not any environment caused by a DBA or the listed parameters.
| |
| Group: 2 SER/SSER Impact: No l 3.11B-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) l Correction of the definition for a potentially harsh !
| |
| l environment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Correction of the definition for a potentially harsh environment with regards to radiation effects on electronic equipment. Text revised to indicate that
| |
| >10E4 Rads Gamma is considered a harsh environment.
| |
| However, due to the susceptibility of electronic equipment to radiation damage >10E3, equipment that i experiences a postulated dose between 10E3 and 10E4 1 will be evaluated to demonstrate qualification to the postulated dose.
| |
| I Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| \ '
| |
| | |
| A )
| |
| ; Attachment to TXX-89201 q
| |
| - May 1, 1989
| |
| : Pagd 30'of 439 a
| |
| : FSAR Page-
| |
| .(as amended) Description 3.118-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| '(Correction)
| |
| Clarification of equipment considered;to be in a
| |
| ~
| |
| :100 percent relative humidity environment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarification that equipment which experiences flooding' due to a DBA is not. considered to be in a 100 percent relative humidity environment. - Thus, item ''e" was added.to address flooding separately, Group: 3 Related SER Section: 3.6.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No.
| |
| '-3.11B .
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarification of the location of design temperatures during normal operation in the FSAR.-
| |
| Group: 4 SER/SSER Impact: No 3A-1 See Page No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction of the definition for a potentially ha~rsh environment.
| |
| Justification: .
| |
| Correction of the definition for a potentially harsh-
| |
| ' environment. The definition was incorrectly. stated in that a potentially harsh environment is an environment due to the' direct effects of a DBA which results in any of the parameters listed in~the FSAR text. It is not any environment caused by a DBA or the listed
| |
| . parameters.
| |
| Group: 2 SER/SSER Impact: No 3A-1 See Page No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction of the definition for a potentially harsh environment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Correction of the definition for a potentially harsh environment with regards to radiation effects on l electronic equipment. Text revised to indicate that
| |
| >10E4 Rads Gamma is considered a harsh env'ronment..
| |
| However, due to the susceptibility of electronic equipment to radiation damage >10E3, equipment that experiences a postulated dose between 10E3 and 10E4 will be evaluated to demonstrate qualification to the postulated dose.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment. to TXX-89201
| |
| 'May li 1989 L Page;31 of 439 o .
| |
| . FSAR'Page (as amended)- Description 3A-1L See Page No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Clarification'of equipment considered.to be in a 100 percent relative humidity environment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarification that equipment which experiences flooding due to a OBA is'not considered to be in a 100 percent-relative humidity environment. Thus, item "e" was added to address flooding separately.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: ?.6.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 4.2-60
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Elimination of the Cold Full-Flow and Cold No-Flow rod drop timing tests.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See Justification for T14.2-3 Sheet 19.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 14.2 ^
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No 4.4-27 See Page No(s): Figure 4.4-10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correct delti-I band from +/- 5% to +3/-12% at E0L Justification:
| |
| The current Figure 4.4-10 shows a delta-1 band of +/-
| |
| 5% at E0L,'which is incorrect. The Technical Specification value of +3/-12% delta-I band, Technical Specification 3.4.2.1,.for E0L is correct. Figure 4.4-10 would require updating every. cycle. The current figure serves no lcng term purpose.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 4.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 5.1-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Indicate the number of sheets for Fig 5.1-1 and that a PORV is mounted on the pressurizer.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 5.1-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Indicates that FSAR contain simplified versions of the piping and instrumentation diagrams.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| = x , .
| |
| ' Attachment! - to TXX-89201 May 1,:1989L Page 32 of 439
| |
| , ' FSAR'Page. '
| |
| psamended)- ' Description-
| |
| !. Figure 5.1-1 See Sheet No(s):01'
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds a; redundant channel- for reactor coolant pressure
| |
| , ; . monitoring on Reactor Coolant Loop 1 to resolve information ambiguity to the operators.
| |
| ' Justification:
| |
| Relocating IPT-437 from RCP Loop 2 (coord E-1) to off sensing line of IPT-405.(coord E-5) RCP Loop 1. This additional channel for the reactor coolant pressure monitoring.is in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.97 as described in FSAR Subsection 7.5.1.3.1.3.by pro-viding additional independent channels of information of the same variable, thus allowing the operators to deduce actual conditions in the plant if information ambiguity is encountered.
| |
| Group: 3 ~
| |
| Related SER Section: 7.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No-Fi.gu're 5.1-1 See.SheetNo(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects figure to show porper symbol for strap-on RTD (coord F-4) and reference Note 12 regarding detector location.
| |
| Group: 4' Related SER Section: 5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 5.1-1 See Sheet. No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revise figure to show tubing lines downstream of root valves on Reactor Coolant Loop 1 & 4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Indiotes replacement of pipe with tubing anri 3/4 X 3/8 pipe to tube adapters downstream of root valves 1 RC-8077 (coord C-6) on loop 4 and IRC-8056 (coord E-6) on loop 1.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.1 SER/SSER. Impact: No Figure 5.1-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) 1 Add notes 24 & 25 to the figure.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 1 Adds note 24 to indicate that thermowells are provided for use if narrow range in-line RTD are required. Adds note 25 to indicate the removal of hot leg RTD manifold u connections and scoops.(see description in Section 5.4)
| |
| L' Group: 3 ' '
| |
| Related SER Section: 7.2.1 d_ ___..m ._ __ _-__ _ ._ _
| |
| | |
| I f
| |
| . Attachment 'to TXX-89201 May~ 1, 1989 :
| |
| Page 33 of 439:
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description SER/SSER Impact: 'No
| |
| @ Figure 5.1-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds BMI thimble guide tube instrument connections, line nos., and locked open valve designation. Corrects line nos., note references, safety class break, piping configuration,. drafting error, and instrument number.
| |
| Corrects valve tag nos and deletes plugs.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 5.1-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Adds "FC" designation to two vaives.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 1 "FC" designation is added for valves 1HV-3609 & 3610 (coord 83) to c'larify actual engineered system' l conditions, i Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 5.1-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds lock closed and normally open valve designations, system break, and relief valve. Deletes valve handwheel extention. Corrects penetration, valve, and line nos.
| |
| Corrects drafting errors and the Boron Recovery System to class 5. Adds dwg. refs. and corrects piping config.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5,1 l SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| ;~ Figure 5.1-1 See Sheet No(s):02 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes the physical location and line sizes of relief i
| |
| valves 1-8117 and 1-8708 A/B to protect CVCS letdown line and RHR Pump discharge piping respectively. This
| |
| : i. FCR us required to meet the requirements of ASME B&PV R Code, Sectionill, Subsections NC-7141C and NC-7311b.
| |
| L Group: 3 L Related SER Section: 5.1 l! SER/SSER Impact: No I
| |
| | |
| . .. < Attachment "to TXX-89201 Sn m , ;May 1, 1989-C JPage-34 of 439 R FSAR Page l (as amended)- Description L. 5.2-13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Just'ification:
| |
| Corrects the discussion ~of procedural controls required-during ECCS testing and'aligment to. preclude-
| |
| . inadvertent ECCS actuation to be' consistent with FSAR i Table 7.3-3.
| |
| Group: 3 .
| |
| Related SER Section: 5.2.2; SSER1 '5.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| [' ;5.2-13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies'that power lockout of the charging pumps will be performed at RCS conditions less'than 350F.
| |
| Group:.4 Related SER Section: 5.2.2 SER/SSER-Impact: Yes l SER 5.2.2.2 page 5-4 is'not consistent as a result of this clarification.
| |
| ?' 5.2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| | |
| ' Justification (: Revision)
| |
| Clarifies the description.of the Containment Sump Flow Monitoring.by incorporating and revising the ' response to Question 212.18. This consolidation will eliminate redundancy.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER.-Section: 5.2.5 !
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No 5.2-49
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial) .q Justification: l Deletes discussion of Igpm leak alarm from item 7 since -
| |
| this is discussed in Section 5.2.5.3 Item 5 on page 5.2-52.
| |
| Group: 4 l
| |
| .Related SER.Section: 5.2.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No I 5.2 I52-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) l Justification: I Corrects the description of the Containment sump level I alarm to clarify detection of a Igpm leak in one hour and incorporates rsponse to Question 212.18 to )
| |
| eliminate redundancy. l Group: 3 J
| |
| Related SER Section: 5.2.5 '
| |
| SER/SSER 1mpact: No l
| |
| 2...L.z.___- ._
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 35 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description 5.2-54
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies wording and corrects description by deleting
| |
| " indicated". The containment sump fill rate alarm is indicated.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.2.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 5.2-54 Drsc?iption: (Editorial)
| |
| < stification:
| |
| farrects description to match label of the alarm.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.2.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 5.2-56, 57
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Incorporates response to Question 212.19 and clarifies that a Igpm or greater leakage requires no readout conversion.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER 3ection: 5.2.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 5.2-2, 3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Updates figure to incorporate Unit I heat-up and cooldown curves based on Reg Guide 1.99 Rev 2. These revised curves were transmitted to the NRC in TXX-89134 on 3/10/89.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 5.3-18, 19 Description (Update)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change text to reflect CPSES compliance with Reg Guide 1.99 Rev 2. Editorial changes are made as well. An advance copy of this change was transmitted to the NRC in TXX-88882, 12/30/88.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No SER 5.3.2 page 5-12, 4th paragraph 2nd sentence is not consistent with the FSAR.
| |
| 5.3-23
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Clarifies and corrects RCS heatup and cooldown rates.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the normal operations heatup and cooldown rate from 50 to 60 deg.F/hr and clarifies 100 deg.F/hr as
| |
| | |
| 1 Attachment to TXX-89201 l May 1, 1989 Page 36 of 439 L FSAR Page-(as a::iended) Description the limiting rate in the vessel design specification. !
| |
| Analyses of the RCS are bn ed on heatup and cooldown cycles performed at a rate of temperature change limited to 100deg.F/hr. Durir:g normal operations a 50 or 60deg.F/hr rate is selected as an industry practice to avoid challenging the 100deg.F/hr limit. These rates are specified and controlled by the plant Technical Specifications.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 5.3-2A, 28 See Sheet No(s):2C and 2D
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Updates and adds information for Unit 1 & 2 Reactor Vessel material properties as a result of Reg Guide 1.99, Rev 2. An advance copy of this change was transmitted to the NRC in TXLC8882, 12/30/88.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 5.3-5 Description- (Update)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Updates vessel belt <line minimum thickness to actual measurement. An advance ccpy of this change was transmitted to the NRC in TXX-88882, 12/30/88.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 5.3-7A, 7B
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provides additional information for Unit 1 & 2 in response to Reg Guide 1.99, Rev 2. An advanc'e copy of this change was transmitted t0 the NRC in TXX-88882, 12/30/88.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 5.4-21
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects Technical Specification section references.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| l.
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989' Page 37 of 439 l
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description 5.4-23
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editcrial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes redundant discussion and provides editorial corrections.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 5.4-24
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies the percentage of expanded tubes in the Steam Generator which will be inspected. This clarification is consistent with SSER #4 Appendix H and Tech Spec Surveillance Requirement 4.0.6.2, Final Draft (3/17/89)
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.4.2; SSER4 App H SER/SSER Impact: No E.4-42
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revise pressurizer Surge line schedule for Unit 1 to reflect l' of schedule 40 piping and delete reference to bypass line which was deleted in a prior-amendment.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 5.2.3.1; SSER1 5.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 5.4-44, 45 See Page No(s):46
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (R9 vision)
| |
| Deletes reference to hot leg bypass scoops and identifies thermowells as added penetrations into Reactor Coolant flow path. ;
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes description of previously plugged hot leg bypass scoops upstream of N-16 monitors since they have j been removed to eliminate possible flow perturbation '
| |
| that may affect the flow measuring accuracy of the N-16 detectors. Identifies that thermowells have been installed in the reactor coolant hot legs to accommo-date the use of in-line narrow range RTDs if uncertain-ty associated with the N-16 detectors should develop.
| |
| Group: 3 ;
| |
| Related SER Section: 7.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No i 5.4-57
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) j Clarifies presence and use of backseats in valves. i Justification:
| |
| Not all manual and~ motor operated valves are provided with backseats by design. Valves are not back seated when open unless repacking is to be performed.
| |
| Groun: 4 i
| |
| | |
| Attachment to 1XX-89201 l May 1, 1989 Page 38 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 5.4-58
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Allows continued RHR operation to control heatup after RC pumps are started.
| |
| Justification: i Revises the description of the RHR pumps operation when the RC pumps are started during plant startup. The RHR pumps are used to controlled heatup rate rather than start or stop RC pumps or bleed steam. T.S. (3.4.1.4.1) requires the RHR pumps to be in operation (MODE 5) even with RC pumps running.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 5.4-58
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Adds setpoint (350 deg F) by which RHR isolation from RCS is required during heatup.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds " prior to reaching 350 degree F" to the description of the RHRS isolation from the RCS.
| |
| This is censistent with FSAR 5.4.7.1 and final proof Technical Specification (3/4.5.2).
| |
| Grcup: 4 Related SER Section: 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 5.4-83
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects design basis of pressurizer PORV to be consistent with FSAR Section 5.2.2.6 & 5.2.2.11.1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects pressurizer PQUV design basis to indicate:
| |
| a) failure position on loss of nitrogen supply instead of air supply b) active instead of inactive classifica-tion c) independent seism s supply of nitrogen.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.2.2.2; SSER01 5.2.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 5.4-88
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Peplace breaks "9, 10, and 11" with breaks "12 and 13". l Justification:
| |
| RCS loop re-evaluation incorporating LBB has eliminated the subject auxiliary line break dynamic effects. Therefore, the next larger nozzle breaks are considered, namely breaks 12 & 13.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.1; 55ER6 3.6.1.1
| |
| - - - _ - _ _ _ _ - - - i
| |
| | |
| Attachment ' to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 39 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description SER/SSER Impact: Yes Lsak-Before-Break reanalysis incorporation into the FSAR has created conflicts with SER Section 3.6.1; SSER 6, Section3.6.1.1; .SSER 12, Section 3.6.1.1; SSER 17, Section 4.1.1.2, Sheet 4-4 & Section 4.1.2.3, Sheets 4-17 & 4-20.
| |
| Table 5.4-18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects footnote to be consistent with Sec 5.4.2.2.2 and Tech Spec Table 4.0.2 Final Draft and provides editorial changes.
| |
| Group: 3 .
| |
| Related SER Section: 5.4.2: SSER4 App H i SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 5.4-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Valve 1-RH-8734B is corrected from an "open" to a "close" position.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.4.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 5.4-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies boundaries between RHR and SI systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds line designations and system boundary points to clarify that 1-TE-604 & 605 are in the RHR System.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 5.4-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revise figure to show piping modifications required to accommodate tie-back supports. A reducer is also added to correct a drafting error.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Piping and tubing for flow element 1-FE-619 (coord A-5) is revised to:1)Show 3/4" pipe from valves - instr tube connectors 2) Add 3/4X3/8 tube connectors 3) Add pipe to instr break. Adds reducer to correct draf ting error.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 5.4-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor changes correct drafting errors on RHR pump seal coolers piping layout and flow direction.
| |
| Justification: !
| |
| Corrects pipe layout and flow direction on RHR pump ]
| |
| ! seal coolers 1 & 2 (coord D-3, D-5). j l
| |
| 1 1
| |
| _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ .J
| |
| | |
| 1 I At
| |
| 'tachment l20 TXX.09201 May.1,_1989.
| |
| ,4 (Page'.40 of 439
| |
| :FSAR Page-
| |
| .(asamended)' Description
| |
| . Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.4 Li SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 5.4-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises drawing to indicate the new line sizes for relief ~ valves 1-870A&B'and capped lines. Revisions made to ensure that relief protection for RHR: ;
| |
| , discharge line meets ASME code requirements.
| |
| Justification:-
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 5.4-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Show temporary strainer and add note.regarding its use.-
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 5.4-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds high point vents, lock closeo. valve designations, and safety class breaks. Corrects valve type, valve no.,,and line no. discrepancies. Relocates and resizes flanges to resolve interference. Adds drawing cross references.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.4
| |
| < SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 5.4-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Revises drawing note regarding emergency / abnormal cool-down rate.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises the cooldown rate from 50 to 100F/hr. ,iie cooldown rates are limited by Tech Specs to 100F/hr under abnormal or emergency conditions, during normal operation it is typically limited to 60F/hr.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: .No Figure S.4-13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Clarifies snubber configuration for each Steam Gevierator upper restraint.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Only snubbers at locations 2 & 4 are installed at the Steam Generator upper restraint (SGUR) to improve plant availability, reduce occupational exposure, reduce L . . . .
| |
| | |
| r _ - _ ,. - _ _ - - _ - - _ _ - -- _ _ _ _ _ _ __
| |
| Q, )
| |
| i " Attachment to TXX-89201?
| |
| f
| |
| * _ May" l', L1989
| |
| -Page.41 of 439
| |
| :FSAR Page
| |
| ; Description j
| |
| .(as' amended) :1 snubber maintenance and testing requirements for
| |
| $ , snubbers during. outage critical path, the removal'of three of the five snubbetro in each of the SGUR have been analytically evaluated. The removal of these l snubbers is consistent with current programs Vor other plants which have received-NRC approval.
| |
| . Group: 2 f Related SER Section: 5.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No SA-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Commitment to use results of Diablo Canyon natural circulation test for comparison. (Insert A)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| $ The previous FSAR statement committed to reviewing the
| |
| .results of the Diablo Canyon testing to demonstrate that CPSES design was sufficiently similar that CPSES need not perform a natural circulation test. This-revision updates the FSAR to state that the results of that comparison. confirms the applicability of the Diablo Canyon test results to CPSES.
| |
| This revision was provided to the NRC in our submittal TXX-88852 dated December 16, 1988, in response to NRC RAI of October 20, 1988.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER and SSER 6 reference the commitment to perform a plant comparison in lieu of performing a natural circulation cooldown test.
| |
| SA-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Natural circulation cooldown procedures.
| |
| , Justification:
| |
| This FSAR section previously provided a commitment to prepare specific natural circulation procedures prior to CPSES startup. This section is now updated to state those procedures have been prepared and indicates that the procedures are based on generic Westinghouse Owners' Group Emergency Response Guidelines with applicable plant specific information included. This update was not part of our submittal TXX-88852 dated December 16, 1988.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.4.3: SSER6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER references the previous commitment to prepare specific procedures for natural circulation cooldown.
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXT.-89201 i
| |
| May 1, 1989 Page 42 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description 5A-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification.n:
| |
| Clarifies that the summary of " procedures" provided in Section II and Ill of Appendix 5A is a sumary of
| |
| " required acticas" contained in the procedures. This clarification was not part cf TXX-88852 of 12/16/88.
| |
| i, Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER5 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No SA-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Celetion of Insert B contained in our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/.16/88.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Insert B was a discussion of an analysis performed in support of a Appendix R fire safe shutdown analysis.
| |
| Since this analysis has never been docketed, it is inappropriate to reference it in the FSAR. In any event, there is no necessity for including this ref erence'. As previously (and currently) stated, the ultimate backup for the Seismic Category I condensete storage tank, is the $eismic Category I Service Water System supplied froin the Seismic Categury I Safe Shutdown Impoundment. Thus water supply for the Auxiliary Feedwater System is not a concern during natural circulation cooldown.
| |
| Insert B is not included in this FSAR amendment.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No ;
| |
| 5A-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Condensate water storage tank capacity.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Additional words are provided to clarify that the Service Water System provides a backup to the condensate storage tank to complete the cooldown to RHR cut-in conditions. This clarification was part of our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88 in response to NRC RAI of 10/20/88, Item F.1.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 SER/SSER impact: No 5A-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The words "of cooldown" were added to clarify the second stage refered to. This clarification was not part of our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No l
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| Attachment i to IXX-89201 Nay.1,'1989 Page 43 of 430 !
| |
| FSAR Page (as emended) Description SA-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies that 4% boric acid translates to 7000 ppm.
| |
| This clarification was part of our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Sectiont 5,4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 5A-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| RCS boron injection flow paths.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provides an additional flow path via the auxiliary pressurizer spray, for injection of boron. This addition was not part of our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SEP Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No SA-10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects location of pressurizer PORV fluid discharge.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The previous description indicated that the PORVs discharge into containment whereas they actually discharge to the Pressurizer Relief Tank which is L located in containment. This correction was not part- 1 of our submittal TXX-88852 dated 12/16/88. j Group: 3 1 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 4 SER/SSER Impact: No 5A-10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) j References the FSAR section containing the design j requirements of the Pressurizer Relief Tank (PRT). '
| |
| (Insert C)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| ! References FSAR Section 5.4.11 for the design l requirements of the PRT. This clarification was part of our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88 in responr,e to NRC RAI of 10/20/88, Item E.2. I Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 -
| |
| SER/SSER 1mpact: No l l
| |
| 5A-10 See Page No(s):13, 18 j
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) i i Deletes reference to the pressurizer vent valves as a 1 means of depressurizing.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The pressurizer vent valves are located in a 3/4 inch
| |
| | |
| Attachment <. to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 44 of 439 FSAR Page jasamended) Description line and would not be particularly useful for depressurization, compared to the PORVs. This revision was part of. our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88 in response to NRC RAI of 10/20/88, Items E.2 and 3.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 5A-10 See Page No(s):18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| D'letes e reference to portable compressed gas cylinder or repairs as specific methods for opening the auxiliary spray valve should it fail closed.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The revised sentence still indicates that every ef fort would be cade to open the spray valve, which may incipde use of a portable compressed gas cylinder or repairs, however reference to these as specific methods constituted a commitment which would require a specific plant procedure. We believe that the optiens available are sufficiently large that they are more appropriately selected as the situation warrants and need not be proceduralized.
| |
| This revision was not part of our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88. 1 Group: 2 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 5A-13 See Page No(s):17
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Letdown via reactor head vent.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The description of alternate boron injection paths is clarified to state that letdown (not injection) is via the reactor head vent. This clarification was part of our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 5A-15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| In the discussion of backup supply for the auxiliary feedwater the words "can be supplied" replaces the word " pumps" for clarity. Also reference is made to Section 11.1 for information related to Seismic Category 1 Service Water System backup supply. This clarifi:.ation was part of our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3
| |
| | |
| [!
| |
| hR Attachment- to~TXX-89201
| |
| 'L May 1, 1989-Page 45 of 439 FSARlPage (asamended) Description
| |
| ~SER/SSER Impact: No.
| |
| p 5A-17
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)-
| |
| : a. Provides additional boration injection flow path.'
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This addition provides a possible alternate flow path via the safety-injection pathway (valves 8801 A/B) in l the event valve FCV-121 fails closed. This addition was no part of our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: ,No SA-18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletes reference to use of portable nitrogen bottles I
| |
| and adds clarification of the effect failure of charging valves 8146 and/or 8147..
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Failure of charging valves 8146 and/or 8147 to close allows a parallel charging path (s) to remain open to the RCS. This will reduce the effectiveness of any spray flow through the auxiliary spray path. ' Should this occur (possibly due to loss of instrument. air) efforts could be made to restore'the operation of those.
| |
| valves. Although these methods may include repairs or use of a portable compressed air cylinder, the specific reference to this method is deleted to avoid an FSAR commitment which would require it be specifically included in plant procedure. The options available for restoration.of operability are sufficiently numerous-that they are more appropriately selected as the situation warrants and need not be proceduralized.
| |
| The above discussion related to impact of leaving valve 8146 and 8147 open is not consistent with our response to Item E.4 to NRi. RAI of 10/20/88 contained in our submittal fXX-88852 of 12/16/88. In that response we stated that we could not identify a need to close these valves and that alternately we could close containment isolation valves 8105 and 8106. This statement was in error. The current FSAR revision is correct.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ,5A-19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Updates natural circulation discussion to reflect the completion of the Diablo Canyon test. This update was included in our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER 6 5.4.a SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment L to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 46 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description SA-20
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises flow resistance information for the comparison between CPSES and Diablo Canyon based on information available after completion of the Diablo Canyon natural circulation test. (inciudes Insert D)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Normal flow (i.e., RCPs operating) hydraulic resistence for various RCS loop components were updated / revised for the table providing comparison between Diablo Canyon and CPSES. In addition, the revised resistances are provided on a total core flow basis instead of the previous per loop basis. Also some of the individual component resistances have been combined (i.e., all individual piping resistances are combined to a single resistence). Based on the revised total hydraulic resistances a revised CPSES to Diablo Canyon Flow Ratio is calculated. The variations between the two plants is primarily due to specific design details of the vessel and internals.
| |
| This updated table was provided in our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/89 in response to NRC RAI of 10/20/88, items A.1 and 2.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER 6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 5A-21
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the statement that the PCS piping resistence coefficient for both plants is the same by stating that they are similar, as reflected in the table. This was provided in our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88 in response to NRC RAI of 10/20/88, item A.2.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER 6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 5A-21 See Page No(s):22
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises the discussion of the differences between the design and resultant flow resistence of the CPSES and the Diablo Canyon steam generators (Insert E).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Previously it was stated there were no differences that would adversely affect the natural circulation characteristics of CPSES. The revision expands the design comparison between the steam generators and concludes that the Diablo Canyon S/G tube bundle higher elevation results in an approximate 6.3"s higher driving head than CPSES. This variance is considered to be small and is partially compensated by the CPSES lower
| |
| | |
| f l Attachment 2 to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 47 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description total hydraulic resistence. A discussion of RCP loss coefficients is also provided.
| |
| This revised information was provided in our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88 in response to NRC RAI of i
| |
| 10/20/88, Items B.1 and 3.
| |
| l Group: 2 Related SER Section: 5.4.3: SSER 6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 5A-22
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises the discussion of the overall effect of design differences between CPSES and Diablo canyon on the flow expected during natural circulation for CPSES.
| |
| (Insert F)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Based on the minor design differences its is expected that natural circulation flow will be approximately 4% lower than at Diablo Canyon. This difference is primarily due to: 1) Lower total hydraulic resistence (not including RCPs) resulting in appro.wimately a 34 higher CPSES flow, 2) Approximately 6% lower driving head due to tube bundle elevation differences resulting in about a 3% lower CPSES flow, and 3) Higher CPSES RCP impeller flow resistence resulting in approximately a 4% lower CPSES flow. The net result of 4% lower flow for CPSES is sufficiently close to Diablo Canyon to indicate that the natural circulation tests results are applicable to CPSES.
| |
| The information contained in this revision is basically the same as that provided in our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88 in response to NRC RAI of 10/20/88 Item B.2 except the direction of flow difference (higher or lower) between CPSES and Diablo Canyon is clarified.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER 6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 5A-23
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects number of steam generators available following the most limiting single failure for the natural circulation event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Previously the FSAR implied that only two steam generators would be available following postulation of single active failure. The number is corrected to three. This correction was provided in our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88 in response to NRC RAI of 10/20/88 Item C.1.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER 6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 48 of 439 FSAR Page lasamended) Description SA-24
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises reactor vessel upper head cooling comparison between Diablo Canyon and CPSES. (Insert G)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The previous table, which provided a comparison between various flow parameters for the upper head, is replaced with a discussion of expected upper head cooling for CPSES based on specific differences between CPSES and Diablo Canyon. This revision does not change the conclusion of the previous tabular information which is that CPSES is expected to have adequate upper head cooling. This revision was provided in our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88, in response to NRC RAI of 10/20/88, Items D. 1, 2, 3 and 4.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 5.4.3; SSER 6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 5A-24 See Page No(s):25
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Added paragraph discussing boron mixing capability.
| |
| (Insert H)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| A new paragraph is added to provide details of calculations performed to establish that CPSES would have adequate boron concentration and mixing during natural circulation. This addition is'the same as that provided by our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88 in response to NRC RAI of 10/20/88, item G.1, except the time required to achieve a 300 ppm boron concentration is clarified to indicate that this analysis assumed that letdown flow is unavailable.
| |
| It is expected that with letdown available boration would take somewhat longer due to the boron removal via letdown.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 5.4.3: SSER 6 5.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No l
| |
| 5A-25
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update) 1 Conclusion Justification:
| |
| The conclusion is updated to reflect that CPSES satisfies the natural circulation requirements of l BTP RSB 5-1 based the completion of natural circulation testing at Diablo Canyon, and a comparison indicating that CPSES will have similar natuaral circulation and boron mixing capabilities. This update was provided in l our submittal TXX-88852 of 12/16/88.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 5.4.3: SSER 6 5.4.3 SER/SSER impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 49 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description 6.18-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes the Hydrogen Purge System from the ESF classification. This change is consisent with the HPS de-classification described in Appendix 1A(B) page IA(B)-3.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.18-13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds a summary of the Non-Nuclear Safety Related Protective Coating System Surveillance Program. This summary is provided in response to the NRC's verbal request on 9/21/88.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.18-14
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises hydrogen and methane gas generation rates as a result of new calculations.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises the hydrogen and methane gas concentration. The volume of hydrogen produced by the irradiation of the cabling materials would not be produced immediately but would follow a production curve similar to that for the hydrogen production due to sump radiolysis. However, even if it were assumed that the total volume of hydrogen predicted for the irradiation of cable materials was released at the very beginning of the accident, the impact on the flammability analysis would not be large. Based on FSAR Figures 6.2.5A-7 & 9, the additional hydrogen would shorten the time to reach 3.5 volume percent hydrogen in the containment from 16 days to approximately 13.5 days. The conclusions stated in Section 6.2.5A.6 of the FSAR remain valid. That is:
| |
| A single hydrogen recombiner, put in operation on the second day following a LOCA or when the bulk containment hydrogen concentration reaches 3.5 volume percent, will maintain the bulk hydrogen concentration well below the combustible limit of 4 volume percent.
| |
| Group: 2 Relcted SER Section: 6.2.4 l SER/SSER Impact: Yes l A related inconsistency is noted: SER pg 6-12 states 4 v/o would be reached in about 26 days and a single recombiner started 1 day after the accident would limit i concentration to 1.9 v/o. FSAR Fig 6.2.5A-9 indicates j 19 days to reach 4 v/o and 2.44 v/o with I recombiner. l
| |
| - _ - - - - _ _ _ _ - - - - _ - -____ _ a
| |
| | |
| l l
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 l' May 1, 1989 Page 50 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Table 6.18-1 See Sheet do(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes the Hydrogen Purge System from the ESF component materials specification Table. This change is consistent with the HPS de-classification described in Appendix 1A(B) page 1A(B)-3.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 6.18-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Revises the quantity of plastic cable insulation and jacket material used in containment as a result of a revised calculation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See justification on page 6.18-14 (#88-783.1)
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.18-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Borated water in Containment Sump.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects Borated Hater and Boron Concentration for Accumulators and deletes Boron Weight and Totals This revision is a result of revised calculations.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact No 6.2-5, 6 See Page No(s): Table 6.2.1-105
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Section is revised to reflect the addition of Containment energy distribution for the .908 square foot Main Steam Line spiit at 704 power presented in tabular form.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.2.1.2; SSER17 4.1.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-22 See Page No(s);23 thru 45, 57 and 58 i
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Reflect new Containment Subcompartment Analysis and application of Leak-Before-Break Analysis.
| |
| This description also applies to all of the Section 6.2 Tables and Figures in Amendment 76.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revise entire description of Containment Subcompartment analysis incorporating the implementation of Leak-
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201-May'1, 1989
| |
| ' Page 51 of 439 FSAR Page
| |
| '(as. amended) Description Before-Break applications to RCL branch lines 10 inches or greater to eliminate consideration of dynamic effects associated'with the postulated rupture of High Energy Piping. The revised description of the containment subcompartment analysis also addresses the details associated with the model and analysis criteria implemented to assess mass /er.ergy release and resultant peak loads upon the structures and component supports.
| |
| The revision..to FSAR tables and figures are provided-
| |
| . consistent with the changes made to the text.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.1; SSER17 4.1.1.2 SER/SSER impact: No 6.2-66
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds a footnote to clarify motor operated valve start ,
| |
| time after SIAS.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 7.3.1.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-80, 81
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects actuation of containment isolation on MSLB or MFLB events.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Containment isolation is initiated when containment isolation provisions are satisfied such as high containment pressure or high radiation.
| |
| For MSLB and MFLB events, containment isolation would not occur if containment pressure (or other affected containment isolation initiator) does not exceed its setpoint. Steam line isolation and feedwater_ isolation signals may be initiated by a MSLB or MFLB event but these are not' containment isolation signals.
| |
| FSAR Chapter 7 is referenced for a discussion on containment isolation provisions as well as other ESF actuation signals such as steamline and feedwater isolation.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SCR Section: 6.2.3 SEH/SSER Irpact: No D
| |
| 6.2-62
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Exceptions to GDC 55.
| |
| L Justification:
| |
| Penetrations that meet the GDC on "other defined basis" as allowed by the GDC, are discussed in FSAR Section 6.2.4.1.3.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ . . _ _ _ _ l
| |
| | |
| k ,
| |
| Attachment- to'~TXX-89201 May 1, 1989-Page,52 of 439.
| |
| e L
| |
| FSAR Page.
| |
| (as amended). Description 6.2-82)
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Defines penetrations required to be closed during.
| |
| accident conditions".
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To clarify which penetrations are subject to technical specification surveillance, lines " required to be-isolated during accident conditions" are defined as-GDC 55.and 56 line3 that': 1. automatically isolation. '
| |
| upon receipt of a containment isolation signal (i.e.,
| |
| Phase A signal, Phase B signal, or C_ontainment Ventilation Isolation signal), or 2. Have' blind flanges or locked closed valves (or deactivated automatic
| |
| -valves, secured in their position in accordance with technical specifications).
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| . Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ~6.2-84
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes reference to Valve Arrangement 32.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The relief valves in Valve Arrangement 32 are part of the containment boundary but are not containment-isolation valves. They are thus removed from this section which deals with containment isolation valves.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER-Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 6.2-98
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Substitutes " ambient" pressure for " constant" pressure.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Test vents are supplied to vent downstream of the valve to ambient not to maintain a constant pressure.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/$5ER 1mpact: No
| |
| , [6.2-98
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletes discussion of Valve Arrangements 2 and 28. 1 Justification. i This section discusses valves leakr. ate tested in a direction reverse of the containment isolation function The valves in valve arrangement 2 are no iorsger Type C ,
| |
| tested, and the valves in arrangement 26 are now tested in the normal (forward) direction.
| |
| Group: 3 J Related SER Section: 6.2.3 l SER/SSER Impact: No J
| |
| l
| |
| - - _ - __ ______ __- _- a i
| |
| | |
| l Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1985 Page 53 of 439 l
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description 6.2-99
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes the Hydrogen Purge System from the description of systems provided at CPSES for ensuring hydrogen concentration is maintained at a safe level. This change is consistent with the HPS de-classification in Appendix 1A(B) page 1A(B)-3.
| |
| l Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER 7.3.1.13 is not consistent as a result of this change since the Hydrogen Purge system is not a backup to the Hydrogen.Recombiner System.
| |
| 6.2-99
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds cable materials as another source for hydrogen gas generation and cross-reference to other FSAR section.
| |
| See discussions provided for Section 6.1B.2 Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 6.2-102, 103
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies that the Hydrogen Purge System is a supplementary system and provides other corrections relating to its actuation consisten with the de-classification described in App 1A(B) page 1A(B)-3.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER 7.3.1.13 is not consistent as a result of this change since the HPS is not a backup to the Hydrogen Recombiner System.
| |
| 6.2-106
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification: ,
| |
| Clarifies dat the HPS is a supplementary system and I provides editorial corrections. Removes the "s" from j scfm because the system can handle 700 cfm and most !
| |
| likely the air will not be at standard temperature and '
| |
| pressure (75 deg,F & 14.7 psi) and adds clarifications.
| |
| Replaces the Reg. Guide used from 1.52 to 1,140.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Sectivn: 6.2.4 SER/S5ER 1mpact: No I
| |
| l
| |
| _________.m. _ _ _ _ I
| |
| | |
| g L'' - Attachment to TXX-89201 l> May l', 1989 L' Page 54 of 439 l
| |
| - FSAR Page-(as amended) Description
| |
| ' 6.2-116
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| [ Removes description that the HPS is a backup to the l .
| |
| hydrogen recombiners. Removes reference to section-15.6.5.4 and Table.6.5 1 and indicates compliance to-Reg. Guide 1.140 instead of 1.52 consistent with the
| |
| , HPS'de-classification' described in Appendix 1A(B).
| |
| Group: 3 i Related SER Section: 6.2.4 1
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| - 6.2-117
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects system classification to be consistent with-the HPS de-classification described in Appendix 1A(8) page IA(B)-3.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-120
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes statement that the Electric Hydrogen Recombiner base material is carbon steel.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes reference to carbon steel base material on the Electric Hydrogen Recombiner. The base ~ material was f abricated from stainless steel material.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-120
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes statement regarding the paint coating require-ments for the Electric Hydrogen Recombiner carbon steel base since the base was fabricated from stainless steel material.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes statement that the tiectric Hydrogen Recombiwer l base is paict coated to satisfy ANSI N101.2. The base i for the recombiner was fabricated fram stainless steel i m6terial, therefore it i+.; not recaired to be coated.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No f (
| |
| 6.2-122, 123 See Page No(s):124
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| The staff needs to resolve the inconsistency between the FSAR and SER on model used for zirc-hydrogen reaction (1.5% vs 5%).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies the assumptions used in the hydrogen genera-
| |
| | |
| (
| |
| (Astuh' ment:- lto;TXX-89201 L lMayd I',- 1989
| |
| 'Page.55'of 439
| |
| <FSAR PageL..
| |
| (as amended) . Description tion analysis and how these assumptions fit.in'with Reg. Guide 1.7. An advance copy of this change was submitted to the NRC in TXX-88827 dated 12-09-88. In following the guidelines of.R.G.1.7, a conservative' determination of the zirconium-water reaction was made:
| |
| by multiplying by five'the calculated value.of 0.3 %,
| |
| thus obtaining the 1.5 % value. The use.of the factor.
| |
| of five is an alternative provided by R.G; 1.7lto assure margin in the detennination of the production of hydroger from this source.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.4
| |
| 'SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section 6.2.4 page 6-12 and Appendix C page C-19 are not consistent with the FSAR.
| |
| 6.2-123
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects reference to Reg. Guide compliance 1.140 vs 1.52 to be consistent with'the changes described in Appendix 1A(B) page 1A(B)-3.
| |
| Group: .4 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 6'.2-132
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds cross-reference to other FSAR section and provides a discussion relating to the hydrogen produced from irradiation of cables. See discussions provided for FSAR section 6.18.2.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No-6.2-134-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes the word " Pressure" from ". Pressure leakage rate testing".
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.5; SSER12 6.2.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No i
| |
| 6;2-135 Otscrirtion: (Update)
| |
| Updates use of ANSI /ANS 56.8 for the rnass-point method during ILRT.
| |
| Justification: .
| |
| See justification under page 3.8-72 Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.5; SSER12 6.2.5
| |
| | |
| .Att'chment a ito TXX-89201 -
| |
| .May 1, 1939L
| |
| .Page 56 of 439.
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description SER/SSER Impact: Yes.
| |
| SSER 12 references ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981.
| |
| 6.2-135
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Expands _ preoperational test to include the Prestart:
| |
| Test Program.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The preoperational test program was previously completed. Prior to startup, those portions of the preoperational. test program the.must be reperformed (due to system modifications that could affect the outcome of the preoperational tes') will be conducted-under the Prestart Test Program.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 14 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-135, 136
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Provides an alternate time. duration for performing required periodic ILRTs based on Bechtel- Topical Report BN-TOP-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| For future periodic performance of the ILRT the ;
| |
| 'Bechtel report allows for reduced duration testing
| |
| .using the methods provided in ANSI N45.4 instead of a minimum 24 hour time period as. required _by the Mass .
| |
| Point method. Appendix J requires-that tests be conducted in accordance with ANSI N45.4 (except for use of Mass-point method which'is conducted in accordance with ANSI /ANS 56.8-1987). N45.4 permits reduced duration testing (i.e., tests with less than a 24 hour duration) providing it is acceptable to the party responsible for the acceptance of the containment structure. The Bechtel report provides the criteria under which such testing is acceptable and has been used on several other dockets.
| |
| Group: 2 Relathd SER Section: 6.'2.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-136
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Acceptability of using either the Mass-Point method of ANSI 56.8-1987 or Reduced Duration testing per Bechtel Topics 1 Report EN-TOP-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The Mass-Point method was included in a recent revision !
| |
| l co Appendix J as an acceptable ILRT method. See page 6.2-139 for justification for reduced duration testing.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.2.3; SSER12 6.2.5
| |
| | |
| M 'A'ttachment -to TXX-89201 Mayal, 1989 9
| |
| - Page 57'of 439 FSAR Page._
| |
| '(as: amended) - De'scription
| |
| .SER/SSER Impact: Yes SSER references.thelpreviously used version of-ANSI /ANS 56.8 (1981 version).
| |
| 6.2-137
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| l - Clarifies that periodic readings of containment parameters are takan at least hourly. This.is in accordance'with ANSI 45.4.
| |
| : Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.5 SER/SSER. Impact: No j K
| |
| - 6'.2-138
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Prestart testing Justification:
| |
| l Reference to.the Prestart program is added to distiguish the upcoming test program from the previously completed preoperational program. The Prestart program includes elements of the preoperationa
| |
| - progrem that are being reperformed prior to Unit 1 fuel load.
| |
| Group: .3 Related SER Section: 14-SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-138- See Page No(s):T14.2-2 sheet 59
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Minimum pathway Justification:
| |
| Clarifies the post repaired local leakage rate as the '
| |
| minimum pathway leakage rate.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.2.5 l , SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-143-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Additional references
| |
| -Justification:
| |
| l Adds ANSI /AN5 56.8-1987 and Bechtel Topical Report l' BN-TOP-1 to the reference section.
| |
| l Group: 4 l_ Related'SER Section: 6.2.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.1-38 See Sheet No(t):06
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) }
| |
| Justi ficat ion.: i Corrects the following typographical errors which were !
| |
| made in INTEGRATED DATA portion of the table in Amend 69: 1) 70200.0 sec is changed to 78200.0 2) 80200.0 is changed to 88200.0 sec.
| |
| t'
| |
| - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __m.__ _ _ _ _ _ _-____._____.__.____-___________.___L._______m______.__________.__._____.m. ____.___ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
| |
| | |
| L Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989
| |
| . Page 58 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.1 SFR/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.1-50A
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects a typographical error for the Containment liner and metal sinks in the 132.00 energy distribution column.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.1-105
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Reflects addition of Containment energy distribution for the .908 square foot Main Steam line split at 70%
| |
| power presented in tabular format.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 3.6.1; SSER3 4.1.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects total number of spray nozzles for Unit 1 consistent with Table 6.5-5 and Figure 6.2.2-1 sht *,.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s) 01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The piping and tubing installation for flow elements 1-FE-4773-1 and -2 (coord E-5, E-2) is revised as follows to accomodate tie back supports.
| |
| : 1. Relocates the 1/2 x 3/4 reducers to valves.
| |
| : 2. Adds a 3/4 x 3/8 tube connector.
| |
| : 3. Adds the pipe to instrument break (301R-2/2505).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER 1:npact: No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 1-Relocates the drain line (VLV ICT-186) from the !
| |
| cownstream to the upstream of vent line (VLV 1CT-004) on the CS HT. EXCH. discharge piping (Coord C-2).
| |
| 2-Relocates the drain line (VLV ICT-187) from
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 59 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description downstream to upstream of reducing "T" on the discharge piping of CS HT. EXCH. discharge piping (Coord D-5).
| |
| This change is made to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No figure 6.2.2-1 See Shcet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds the containment spray pun,p seal leak-off drain piping '(Coord H-3). This change reflects the as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 l SER/SSER Impact: No rigure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Note 11 is revised so that it is understood that only the ANSI-SAFETY CLASS for the tanks, related piping and valves has been down-graded, however they shall remain installed as ASME Code Class 2 components.
| |
| Group: 4 ;
| |
| Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Relocates the drain line from directly downstream of flow element 1-FE-4772-1 (Coord E-6) to in-between valve ICT-097 and the vent line located downstream of this flow element. This relocation is made for better accessability.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No I Figure 6J2.2-1 See Sheet Nc,(s):01 !
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) i
| |
| [-
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The Containment Spray Pumps mini flow test lines are t. hanged from Class 5 to Safety Class 2 ,
| |
| (i.e. ASME 111, Class 2) to comply with ANSI N18.2, i R.G. 1.26, and SRP 6.2.2 and the piping routing is modified.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 b ____ ___ _ _ _ __ )
| |
| | |
| 1 l
| |
| [ Attachment May 1,.1989 to TXX-89201 -1 L
| |
| L Page 60 of 439 L l 1
| |
| FSAR Page.
| |
| Description
| |
| )
| |
| (as amended)
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification: j Deletes Lines 16-CT-1-900-601R2 and 16-Cl l-901-301R2 j (Coord C-5) to reflect as-built conditions. 1 Group: 3 i Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| , Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects a drafting error made for the class break at valves 1-CT-177 and 1-CT-178 (Coord. 82)
| |
| Group: 4.
| |
| Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impap : No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the test connection (VLV ICT-054) line size from "3/4 in" to "2 in" provided on line
| |
| #16-CT-1-013-301R-2 downstream of MOV 1HV-4776 (Coord C-5).
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the number of nozzles provided in Region A, ring header 4 (train A) from "120" to "119" to reflect as-built conditions (Coord A-4). This correction is consistent with FSAR subsection 6.5.2.2.1.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet N?(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justi fication:
| |
| Corrects the number of nozzles provided in Region A, ring header. 2 (train A) f rom "48" to "47" to reflect as-built conditions (Coord A-3).
| |
| This correction is consistent with FSAR Subsection 6.5.2.2.1.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| | |
| r Rttachment: !to IXX-89201
| |
| :May 1, 19893
| |
| , Page 61 of 439-FSAR Page (as amended) Description
| |
| ; Related SER Section: 6.5.2 l
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01 L
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects a drafting error for the number of. nozzles in Region B, train A and train B from'"57" to "67"
| |
| -(Coord A-2 and A-5). This is consistent with FSAR Table 6.5-5 and Fig. 6.5-2.
| |
| Group: 4 L Related SER $ection: 6.5.2 l SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds drain symbol to lines 2-CT-1-081-301R-2 (Coord C-4) and 2CT-1-002-301R-2 (Coord B-2) to-reflect the provisions for these lines.
| |
| Group: 4 Relcted SER Section: 6 5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)-
| |
| Adds drain valves to facilitate Local Leak Rate testing of Containment 1 solation Valves 1HV-4776, 1HV-4777, ICT-145 and ICT-142.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds drain valves ICT-300 & 1CT-301 downstream of the Containment Spray Heat Exchanger (Coord C-2 & C-5) to support the Appendix J testing requirements on Contain-ment Isolation valves 1HV-4776, 1HV-4777, ICT-145 and 1CT-142. The existing drain valves ICT-186 & ICT-187 are located at a low point for several sections of large bore pipe, therefore the use of these valves would require more time to conduct the test due to drainage. In addition, the use of these valves may not give an accurate leakage rate of the valve being tested since the block valves in the large bore piping may contribute additional leakage.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section.: 6.2.3; SSER6 6.2.3.2 SER/SSER 1mpacts No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds a new test connection for testing Containment Iso-lation valve ICT-142 since the previous test connection is inaccessible for testing hook-up and restoration.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| | |
| lttachment~' to TXX-89201-May.1,.1989 Page 62 ~of:439 m FSAR Page.
| |
| (as amended) Description Adds a new test connection via valve 1CT-302'for Containment Isolation valve ICT-142 and 6bandones the previous test connection via valve ICT-143 by adding-Note 14. (Coord. B-5). The location of ICT-143 does not provide accessibility for testing hook-up.and restora--
| |
| tion.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.3; SSER6 6.2.3.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| . Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correct.the number of nozzles and removes reference and ;
| |
| note 12.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the number of nozzles in Region A r#r,g header
| |
| . 4 (train B) from "120" to "119" to reflect as-built conditions-(Coord A-2). Corrects the cotal number of nozzles per train (coord A-6) Removes ref 'and note 12 ;
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Fig'ure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction).
| |
| Corrects drafting errors and notes. Add 3 drawing cross references and test connections. Adds relief valves for overpressure protection.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| <. Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| L Corrects the valve tag number for ICT-081 to 1CT-083.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editirial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Line size is revised from 3" to 2" on 00-1-02-151-S Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| ittachmentl to TXX-89201 *
| |
| ..May 1, 1989
| |
| -Page'63 of 439 FSAR Page (as aihended) Description Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The "open" indication-for vent valves 1 CT-221 (Coord C-5) and 1 CT-223 (Coord C-6):is corrected to the closed position to reflect their ourmal-y operating condition.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: ho Figure 6.2'.2-1 See. Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revise drawing'to show valve on Nitrogen Supply.to'
| |
| ' Chemical Additive Tank normally closed.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Nitrogen supply to Chemical. Additive Tank has been
| |
| , changed to manual control to ensure that pressure does not exceed 2 psig.. 1CT-117 (coord F-3)'is changed to normally closed. i Group: 3~
| |
| Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds drawing cross references and corrects valve types, piping classification and configuration, and also corrects safety class requirements for valve isolation tanks, pipes, related expansion joints, vents, drains, and valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To reflect as-built coditions.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6 2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the drain line downstream of valve ICT-127 from a capped pipe end to a blind flanged end to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-1 See Sheet No(s):09
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects ESF designation of items 94 and 102.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| | |
| l Attachment- to TXX-89201 May'1,.1989-Page 64 of 439 i
| |
| FSAR Page I (as amended) Description Related SER Section: 6,2.3 SER/SSER Impact. No Table 6.2.4-1 See Sheet No(s):10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletion 9f thennal relief valves (items lila and 111b)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These vahes were deleted because they were not containment isolation valves.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| . Items 4a, 9a, 13a, 17a and 18a are clarified to read
| |
| " local manual" vice " manual".
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6J .3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 12
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Adds relocated column titled " Direction of Test".
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Table 6.2.4-5 is deleted. This portion of information contained in that table is relocated to this table.
| |
| (See justification under Q&R 022-48)
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):01, 02, 05, 06, and 07
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Items 4, 17, 42, 54, 55 are corrected to be remote manual for primary actuation and N/A for secondary actuation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These were previously listed as " auto open". However, auto open is not a containment isolation category.
| |
| Group: 3 I Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):04 thru 07
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Valves associated with items 35, 36, 43, 44, 45 and 63 are revised to reflect requirement for Type C testing, normal air testing, or tested with water per Note 3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The containment isolation valves associated with the
| |
| | |
| n- 4 Attahhment- to TXX-89201-L . May 1, 1989:
| |
| - Page 65 of 439 .;
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description - {
| |
| the above item numbers wh e previously not Type C .
| |
| tested per Notes 2, 4 and 6. These valves are now'all Type C' tested, either with air, or, in the event that a water loop seal can be demonstrated. to exist post-accident for at least 30 days, a Type C water. test is-performed at a water pressure not less than 1.1Pa per Note 3 of the table.
| |
| These changes were previously transmitted to the NRC by TXX-89104 dated February 28, 1989. The cu'rrent change.
| |
| is revised from that version, by adding the words, "or with air at pressure Pa" to clarify that a normal Type C' air test may be performed on these valves.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.3; SSER6 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SSER 6' discusses stem leakage testing found to be acceptahle in lieu of Type C testing valves 1-8802A, 1-8802B and 1-8840. Per. item 43, 44 and 63 above these valves are now Type C water tested.
| |
| Table 6.2.4-2. See Sheet No(s):06
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Valves associated with items 47, 48, 49 and 50 were previously Type C tested but are no longer tested per Note 4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Appendix J requires Type C testing of PWR containment isolation valves if they: 1) provide direct connection to the containment atmosphere, 2) are required to close automatically upon receipt of a containment isolation signal to affect containment isolation or 3) are required to operate intermittently post-accident. Per Note 4, these RCP seal injection valves associated with the above items are normally open and remain open post-eccident. They are therefore not required to be ~
| |
| Type C Tested.
| |
| These changes were previously transmitted to the NRC by 1XX-89104 dated February 28, 1989.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):08 and 09
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds new containment isolation valves, items 74a, 81a, and 83a.
| |
| Justification: ;
| |
| These items are recently installed thermal relief valves subject to Type C testing. t Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Iinpact: No i
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989
| |
| .Page 66 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Table 6.2.4-2 SeeSheetNo(s'):10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Daletes items lila and 111b.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These items are relief valves that were incorrectly added in a previous amendment. They are not containment isolation valves.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Tdble 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletion of Type C testing for items 125, 126, 127 and 128.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These RHR and Containment Spray valves (supply from containment recirculation sump) are the subject of a current Appendix J exemption request. See TXX-89110 dated March 13, 1989.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):12
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds items 130, 131, and 132.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These items are the airlocks and equipment batch and were added for completeness.
| |
| Group: 4 ;
| |
| Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Shoet No(s): 13 4 Description (Clarification)
| |
| Justificatica:
| |
| Clarifies " single failure" in Note 2 by adding the word " active". ,
| |
| This item was include in our letter to the NRC l TXX-89104 dated February 28, 1989.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No i
| |
| Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises Type C water test pressure in Note 3 Justification:
| |
| Increeses test pressure for Type C water test from Pa to 1.1 Pa in accordance with Appendix J requirements -
| |
| | |
| ' Attachment ' to:TXX-89201
| |
| ~May.:E, 1989 c .PageL67 of 439-1
| |
| 'FSAR Page (as-amended)- Description I-This item was included our letter.to the NRC TXX-89104 dated February.28, 1989 and revised to clarify. that a normal Ty'pe C air test at pressure Pa ,
| |
| may be. performed on the valves referencing Note 3. i Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table'6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| :. Note 4 is corrected to delete "ESF". Th'ese are not ESF valves as previously stated. Also adds'" active"'to
| |
| " single active failure". This item was included in,our letter to thr~ NRC TXX-89104 dated February 28, 1989.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.3
| |
| -SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| . Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletion of Note 6.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Note 6 was originally added to permit stem leakags checks in !ieu of type C testing. The valves to which this note applied are now being Type C water tested.
| |
| The note is no longer necessary. This item was included in our letter to the NRC TXX-89104 dated February 28, 1989.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6. 2.'3 ; SSER6 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SSER 6 discusses the acceptability of stem leakage checks in lieu of Type C testing.
| |
| Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(5): 13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises Note 8 to clarify that local vent, drain and test connections do not require Type C testing.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Note 8 provides its own justification. This item was included in our letter.to the NRC TXX-89104 dated February 28, 1989.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER' Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Addition of new Note 9.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Note 9 contains information related to the RHR and
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1981 Page 68 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Containment Spray valves (supply from the containment recirculation sump) justifying not performing Type C tosting. These valves currently have an exemption request pending by letter TXX-89110 of March 13, 1989.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Added new Note 10.
| |
| (See Q&R 022-48 response)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| As a result of deleting Table 6.2.4-5, information related to the direction of Type C testing was relocated to Table 6.2.4-2. This note explains the meaning of the "Yes" and "No" in the column entitled
| |
| " Direction of Test".
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-3 'See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Adds clarifying Note 1 to " Remarks" column of items: 2, 7, 11, and 15.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The note clarifies that these are manual MSIV bypass valves which are normally locked closed with the exception that one may be open during steam line warmup.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-3 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Adds clarifying Note 2 to items 1, 6, 10, and 14.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Note 2 provides information related to valve failure position following loss of hydraulic pressure for the MSIVs.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-3 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects valve failure position on valve power failure from " Closed" to "N/A". Change applies to items: 2, 4a, 5a, 5b, 7, 9a, 9b, 11, 13a, 13b, 15, 17a, 18a, 18b, l
| |
| 20b, 22b, 24b, and 26b.
| |
| _ - _ - _ _ __. _-_- . _ _ - - - _ _ .-. ._-_-______--_-__________-_a
| |
| | |
| l Attachment. to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 69 of 439 i
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description Justification:
| |
| The valves associated with the above items are not powered or controlled electrically and therefore the failure mode on loss of power does not apply.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-3 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Reference to Steam Line Isolation and feedwater Line Isolation is deleted from the column entitled ,
| |
| " Containment 1 solation Signal" and relocated to the
| |
| " Remarks" column. Affects item numbers 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12,14,16,19,20c,20d,21,22c,22d,23,24c,24d,25,26c,26d.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Although the valves associated with the above items receive steam line or feedwater line isolation signals, these are not containment isolation signals.
| |
| The only containment isolation signals are Phase A, Phase B, and Containment Ventilation Isolation signals.
| |
| The discussion of other kinds of isolation signals is moved to the " Remarks" column to distinguish them from the containment isolation signal affected valves which have specific technical specification surveillance requirements.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-3 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes " Closed" or " Opened" to " Opened / Closed" for the valve position during " Normal", " Shutdown", or " Post-Accident" configuration for a number of the items in this table.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change affects item numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4a, 5, Sa, 6 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20a, 20b, 20c, 20d, 22a, 22b, 22c, 22d, 24a, 24b, 24c, 24d, 26a, 26b, 26c, 26d, 33, 34, 35, 36, 43, 44, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 54, 55, 56, 63, 111, 112, 117, 119, 122, 125, 126, 127, 128.
| |
| The previous single valve position designation implied '
| |
| that only the position noted was normal for that plant conditie'. The table is corrected to indicate either opened or closed may be normal for that plant condition, depending on the evolution being performed.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| I. j l
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 L May 1, 1989 Page'70 of 439 )
| |
| i FSAR Page (as amended) Description Table 6.2.4-3 See Sheet No(s):04, 05, 06, 07, 11, 12, 13, 17
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds clarifying remark to items: 20, 22, 27, 28, 29, l 30, 73, 76, 79, 82, Ill, and 112.
| |
| J Justification:
| |
| GDC 57 valves are not required to close automatically upon receipt of a containment isolation signal although it is permissible. GDC 57 valves may also be remote manual or locked closed. The valves associated with the items above are GDC 57 valves that close upon receipt of a Phase A containment isolation signal. They are also capable of remote manual operation. The CPSES Technicat Specifications require 31 day surveillance of all containment isolation valves which are required to close upon receipt of a containment isolation signal. Remote manual containment isolation valves are not required to be surveilled. The note added to the " Remarks" section for the subject valves is intended to indicate that from a GDC 57 standpoint these valves are considered to be remote manual valves and not subject to the 31 day Technical Specification surveillance.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-3 See Sheet No(s):07 thru 11,16 and 17 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| The position of some of the containment isolation valve associated with a penetration was not previously included. The Table is revised to include isolation valves previously omitted. Items 33, 34, 35, 36, 41, 42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,54,55,56,62,63,71,104, Justification:
| |
| 113, 117, 118, 119 and 120 are revised.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-3 See Sheet No(s):07 thru 18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Additional clarifying remarks added to describe the type of valve (i.e., check valve, relief valve),
| |
| device (i.e., bellows seal) and method of closure (i.e., flanged) for numerous items.
| |
| d Group:
| |
| Relatec stR Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| -- - - - _ - - - _ _ - - -. __ _- - _ - _ - - - - . __----______----_.--__.-.---...-_----_-_---__.~.J
| |
| | |
| ; Attachment c to TXX-89201~ '
| |
| .J L' May 1, 1989 )
| |
| [' 'Page 71 of 439
| |
| .q FSAR Page (as amended) Description Table 6.2.4-3 See Sheet No(s):09
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Relocates the Safety Injection signal frora the _.
| |
| " Containment Isolation Signal" column to the " Remarks" column for item'46. L
| |
| -Justification: 1
| |
| 'The safety injection signal is not a containment !
| |
| isola + %n signal.
| |
| Group: -
| |
| Related iection: 6.2.3 SER/SSER . gact: No Table 6.2.4-3 .See Sheet No(s):10 and 16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| ' Adds _ Note 3 to items: 58, 59, 109, and 110.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These GDC 56 valves are sealed closed in modes 1 thru 4
| |
| , and Note 3 explains this.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-3 See Sheet No(s):17
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revised closure time for valves associated with items:
| |
| 117, 118 and'119 from 10 seconds to 15 seconds.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These GDC-57 valves provide component cooling water supply and return for the RCP motors and the component cooling water return from the RCP thermal shields.
| |
| The increase in closure time is consistent with the existing accident analyses for radioactive release sceneries and is also consistent with ANS 56.2 recommended closure times for these sizes of-valves.
| |
| The previous 10 second closure time was based on nominal design information, with actual closure times varying slightly from nominal.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.2.3
| |
| .SEP/SSER Impact: No table 6'2.4-3 See Sheet No(s):17
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes items lila and 111b.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These relief valves are not containment isolation valves. j Group: 3
| |
| ~
| |
| Related SER Section: 6.2.3 3ER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| j
| |
| | |
| n,_--..-_----------- - ~ - - - - - - - . . - . - - . _ _ - _ - - . - - . . - - _ - - - - - - - - .
| |
| Attachment i to TXX-89201 May~1, 1989 Page 72 of 439 F.SAR Page (as amended) Description Table 6.2.4-3 See Sheet No(s):18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Added description of Notes 1, 2 and 3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Notes added.to clarify various items as previously described.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds a penetrations, items 125, 126, 127 and 128 to the list of penetrations that are not drained or vented during ILRT.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The containment sump recirculation lines are added but were not previously included.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies
| |
| * note to indicate the items maybe water filled during Type A testing but are not required to be.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletes Table 6.2.4-5 Justification:
| |
| See justification under page Q&R 022-48.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletes items lila and 111b.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These relief valves are not containment isolation valves.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.5-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes the HPS from this Table to be consistent with the de-classification described in Appendix 1A(B) page 1A(B)-3.
| |
| 2
| |
| | |
| JAttachment .:to TXX-89201
| |
| ;
| |
| * 2May 1;-1989
| |
| :Page 73 of 439'
| |
| :FSAR Page
| |
| .(as amended) Description Group: 3
| |
| .. Related SER Section: 6.2.4
| |
| .SER/SSER Impact:.No 6.3-11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies the description of.ECCS motor. operated valves by adding the word " gate".
| |
| Group: 4 Related $ER Section: 6.3'.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| .6.3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Stem packing ECCS MOVs less than 2 inches.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds a sentnece to clarify that motor-operated valves 2 inches and under are not supplied with stem leakoffs.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.3.2 SER/SSER impact: No 6.3-13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revised accumulator check valve testing description to be consistent with proposed Technical Specifications and plant design.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The description of the accumulator check valves testing is revised to reference the appropriate FSAR section (6.3.4.2) which discusses the requirements for conduct-ing the Leak Rate Testing (LRT). The previous descrip-tion implied testing 0 every plant heatup, indicated testing in excess of 1000 psi, implied using RCS fluid as the pressure medium, indicated that Accumulator MOVs would be opened after the test. The intent of the argu-ment is to indien:. that perforaing LRT on these valves will provide assurance that leakage across the valves will not impair accumulator availability. The argument was not intended to infer how the test would be per-formed. Testing will be conducted in accordance with ASME Section XI, is included in T.S. (3 A.6.2 & 3.5.1) ar.d are described in other FSAR sections. The opening of the MOVs will be controlled by T..S. LC0 ( Mode 3, Pressurizer pressure above 1000 psig ).
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.3; SSER12 App R SER/SSER Impact: Yes Although the SER is not inconsistent as a result of this change, SSER 12 Appendix R (Section 3.1.7 & Table l
| |
| : 1) is not consistent with CPSES Proposed T.S. changes made in order to conform with Standard T.S. and as pro-vided in TXX-6905 dated 10-30-87.
| |
| - - - .4' - ------_----------.-----__---.n_-___--_
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 74 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended)
| |
| Description 6.3-16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes statement that audible alarms are sounded in the control room for manucily operated valves which are normally in their ready position for in.iection from
| |
| ;. FSAR description. See description provided for T6.3-3.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.3.2 SER/SSER impact: No 6.3-39
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises ECCS Performance Tests to provide option for-RHR pump suction alignment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See Justification for Table 14.2-2 (Sheets 15 and 15A)
| |
| Safety Injection System Hydraulic Performance Test Summary.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.3.4; SSER1 6.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No .
| |
| Table 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects arithmetic error for the volume of nitrogen gas in the Safety Injection accumulators.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The list of ECCS motor operated valves is expanded to include additional valves and their associated operating times.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.3-3 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects table to indicate those valves which gre not j provided with out-of position alarms and adds a new I column to indicate those valves that have redundant valve status indication.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the Alarms column and adds cslumn indicating redundant indication for ECCS motor cperated isolation valves This change clarifies and reflects as-built conditions and is consistent with SER sectica 3.4.3 requirements for dual indication on power lockout
| |
| | |
| Attachment to Txx-89201
| |
| :May 1 1989- .j Page 75 of 439
| |
| ! FSAR Page (as amended) Description valves and SER Section 6.3.3.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.3.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds caps to vent valves 1-51-163 (Coord E-2),
| |
| 1-SI-8971 (Coord F-3) and drain valve. 1-51-175 (Coord F-3) lines. This change is made to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):01 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects line number discrepancies, adds locked-closed
| |
| ' indication to 151-053 to meet containment isolation requirements, adds note reference, corrects valve i
| |
| position, shows caps on vent / drain lines, and shows miniflow lines out-of-function. Adds safety class 2 and equipment no. to water storage tank.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification.:
| |
| 1-Deletes the piping size, category and class designation "3/4-2501R-1" from the already designated line #3/4-SI-911-2501R-1 (Coord 8-5).
| |
| 2-Adds the Line #3/4-2501R-5 to the class 5 line downstream of valve 1-51-102 (Coord B-5).
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.3.2 SF.R/SSER Impact No ;
| |
| L Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):02 L
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 1-Deletes the piping size, category and class designation "3/4-2501R-1" from the already designated line #3/4-SI-1-908-2501R-1 (Coord B-3) 2-Adds the line #3/4-2501R-5 to the class 5 line downstream ef valve 1-51-101 (Coord B-3)
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.3.2 SER/SSER impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to Txx-89201 May-1, 1989 Page 76 of 439
| |
| 'FSAR Page (as amended) Description Figure 6.3 1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| ' Adds class break at the discharge of relief valves 1-SI-176 (Coord F-6) and 1-51-177 (Coord G-6)
| |
| Group:.4 Related SER Section: 6.3'.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 6.3-1 SeeSheetNo(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Relocates the designated line break (601R-2-2501R-2) on line #1-SI-1-161-601R-2 to directly downstream of valve 1-SI-8934A (Coord E-2). This change reflects as-built piping conditions which are consistent'with the Safety Injection System Engineering and functional requirements.
| |
| Group: 4 ~
| |
| Related SER Section: 6.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes the 2 inch discharge nipple to venting l directly to the atmosphere. This change is made to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.3.2
| |
| , SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects a drafting error on the valve number for 1-LT-950 from 1-51-065 to 1-51-069 (Coord D-1)
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds a designated line break (2505-602), a i x 3/8 tube connector and instrument valve 1-8817 (Coord G-2) on the tubing sensing line to pressure regulating valve 1-8893. The instrument valve allows for maintenance of the positioner on valve 1-8893 s without depressuriting the ) inch process line.
| |
| This change is made to reflect as-built condition.
| |
| o
| |
| | |
| L . .
| |
| Attachment -to TXX-89201-
| |
| ' May 1~, 1989
| |
| .Page 77 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description .
| |
| Group: 3 Related-5ER Section: 6.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 1-Deletes the piping size, category.and class designation "3/4-2501R-1" from the already designated line #3/4-SI-1-910-2501R-1 (Cood B-2)L and.line #3/4-SI-1-909-2501R-5 (Coord B-6).
| |
| 2-Adds the line #3/4-2501R-5 (Coord B-2 & Coord B-6) to the class 5 line downstream of valve 1-51-100 and 1-51-103.
| |
| This change reflects the as-built-conditions.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.3-1 SeeSheetNo(s):02 ,
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor change corrects valve tag number on figure.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects instrument isolation valve tag number 151-058 on IPT-962 (coord D-3).
| |
| Group: 4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Relocates relief valve for SIS test header and adds piping information.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds line numbers and size, identifies class break and discharge for thermal relief valve 151-8972. The pro-visions for thermal relief valves are discussed in.FSAR Subsection 6.2.4.1.3.
| |
| Group: 4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Minor drawing corrections for accumulator tag numbers, relief valva lirie size, AShE class breaks on some lines pipe cbs3 te certcin instruments, locked closed ir.Jicatf en for 151-034, add line coord. loc. reference.
| |
| Also add 3 lint n ubers and deletes plug.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/S5ER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| J
| |
| -Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| 'tlay 1,-1989 Page,78 of_439
| |
| , F54R Page
| |
| .(as amended) Description -
| |
| Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet'Nc(s):02 and 04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor drawing changes correct piping and instrument designations and reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Sh 1-Show pipe class break on 1-SI-89348&C (coord E-3,.
| |
| E-5). Remove pipe designation from valve 1-8880 (coord G-1), Sh 4-Change' instrument tag from 1-FT-968 to 1-F1-968 (coord F-4).
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 6.3-1 'SeeSheetNo(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)-
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects a drafting error on a line number from "6-SI-1-145-2501R-1" to '6-SI-1-148-2501R-1" (Coord A-2)
| |
| Group: 4 .
| |
| Related SER Section: 6.3.2 SER/SSER impact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects drafting errors and omissions and reflects as-built conditions by adding line numbers and reducers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds ~ line number downstream of valves 1-8949A-D (coord A-1-A-3). Adds valve tag no 151-017 to test connection provided downstream of moment restraint CPI-SISSMR-01 '
| |
| (coord B-2). Adds line number downstream of valve' 151-010 (coord E-2). Incorporates reducers et test connection lines (coord 0-2, 0-3) and upstrean of valve 1-8879D (coord B-6). These changes are made to correct drafting errors.
| |
| Group: 4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):03 '
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds lock closed valve designations and s6fety class breaks. Corrects drafting errors and line no. and valve no. discrepancies. Adds drawing cross references and corrects piping configuration.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To relect as-built conditions.
| |
| I Group: 4 l
| |
| Related SER Section: 6.3
| |
| 'SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| ~
| |
| ' Attachment- to'TXX-89201 May 1,J1989 Page 79 of 439:
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description .
| |
| Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Relocates the pressure transmitter 1-PT-919 and associated piping and valve 1-SI-8918A on the safety injection pump discharge piping from the downstream to the unstream of line #3-SI-1-335-1501R-2 (Coord 0-2). This relocation is made to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects piping configuration, pressure transmitter location, drafting errors, and reclassification of the Boron Recycle System to class 5. Adds drawing cross references, general notes. deletes line nos. and ref.
| |
| to local sample. Corrects flow direction symbols. ,
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| .Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies boundaries between RHR and SI systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds line designations and system boundary designation to show that 1-TE-604 & 605 are in the RHR System.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.3 See Sheet No(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Minor changes add RHR/SI interface on figure.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies RHR/SI system interface on the RHR pump RWST suction line. (coord F2 & F3)
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds drawing cross references and valve stem leakoff, deletes safety class break, corrects general notes and safety class breaks. Corrects piping configuration.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| L
| |
| | |
| 7__-_-____
| |
| p
| |
| ' Attachment to TXX-89201- :
| |
| May-1,'1989 Page 80.of-439 l
| |
| .FSAR Page (as amended) Description .
| |
| To reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.4-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Removal of automatic control room isolation from chlorine detectors.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Automatic isolation of the chlorine detectors-is removed and the capability of manual isolation of the control room is discussed. Also, a reference to the toxic chemical ~ analysis section is added.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section 6.4 page 6-19 is not consistent as a result of this change.
| |
| 6.4-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| -(Revision) '
| |
| Removal of automatic control room isolation from chlorine detectors.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Discussion of chlorine detectors is removed and a discussion of the function of the control room smoke detectors has been added.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section 6.4, page 6-19 is not consistent as a result of this change.
| |
| 6.4-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Removal of control room isolation from chlorine and smoke detectors.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes discussion of chlorine detectors and smoke detectors automatic isolation provisions. This mode of operation of the control room ventilation system is provided by manual initiation only.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section 6.4 page 6-19 is not consistent as a result of this change.
| |
| 6.4-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes reference to chlorine detectors.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.4 4
| |
| | |
| ,a i
| |
| 1 Attachment- to TXX-89201' i May 1, 1989 l Page'81 of 439 i l
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description ,
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: Yes ..
| |
| SER Sec 6.4 page 6-19 is not consistent as a result of this change.
| |
| 6.4-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Removal of control room isolation from chlorine detectors.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes discussion of automatic functions of the control room HVAC system from chlorine detectors, Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section 6.4 page 6-19 is not consistent as a result-of this change.
| |
| 6.4-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Replace text inadvertently deleted in Amendment 46.
| |
| Group: 4 '
| |
| Related SER Section: 6.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.4-11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification'n:
| |
| Removes discussion of chlorine detectnrs and previous evaluation performed.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Sec 6.4 page 6-19 is not consistent as a result of l this change.
| |
| 6.4-13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies that fire protection is annunciated in the control room by adding the word " fire".
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.4-14
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes reference to chlorine detectors and automatic actuation due to chlorine detection.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.4
| |
| | |
| ll
| |
| ~
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 82;of 439
| |
| .FSAR Page
| |
| [ '
| |
| (as amended) . Description .-
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Sec 6.4 page 6-19 is not consistent as a result of
| |
| 'this change.
| |
| . 6 '. 4 - 15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes reference 5 to be consistent with FSAR text' revisions.
| |
| Group: 4-Related SER Section: 6.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.4-15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes reference 9 to be consistent with text revision Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.4-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) ,
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Note that smoke detection does not automatically initiate the isolation mode of the control room ventilation system and to remove reference to the control room chlorine detectors.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Sec 6.4 page 6-19 is not consistent as a result of' this change.
| |
| 6.S-2, 3 SeePageNo(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects table to implement the negative pressure cri-teria applicable to plant HVAC systems, and makes minor miscellaneous technical and reference corrections Justification:
| |
| Corrects table [ contained within text], which indicates the filters performing safety-related functions follow-ing a DBA, to reflect as-built conditions. Adds the-Auxiliary and Fuel Handling Building to those buildings-for which the ESF exhaust units are designed to main-tain at a slightly negative pressure. Deletes Table 9.4-7 as it does not indicate efficiencies for charcoal and'HEPA filters.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| s s = __ _'- _-__ _ _ -_ __- . _ -- = _ - -
| |
| | |
| 1 Attachment 'to TXX-89201 l
| |
| m -May 1,'1989 .
| |
| Page 83 of 439 J FSAR Page jasamended) Description.
| |
| 6.5-2, 3 See Page No(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes the HPS from the ESF filter systems' consistent with the de-classification described in Appendix 1A(B) page 1A(B)-3 Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.4-SER/SSER Impact: No 6.5-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds reference to Table 6.5.2 to aid in locating component design parameter information.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER. Impact: No 6.5-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| '(Correction)
| |
| Corrects sodium hydroxide concentration and sump py range.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| ~ Corrects strength of sodium hydroxide solution in chemical additive tank to "28 to 30 weight percent".
| |
| Corrects the sump pH range fro "8.6 to 10.5" to "8.5 to 10.5" to be consistent with 3.11B.5.1 change.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes SER 6.5.2 page 6-22 is not consistent as a result of this change.
| |
| 6.5-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects description of sodium hydroxide concentration to "28 to 30 weight percent" to be consistent with page 6.5-8 correction.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes i SER 6.5.2. page 6-22 is not consistent as a result of I this change.
| |
| L 6.5-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Removes discussion relating to the design of the !
| |
| eductors to limit Na0H addition.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The methodology for determining the pH during the injection phase is not solely based on the design of the eductors, but on system performance with postulated single failure. See justification on page 6.5-22.
| |
| Group: 3 i .
| |
| | |
| . . 4 Attachment' to.TXX-89201 May 1,~ 1989' Page 84 6f 439 L FSAR Page
| |
| , (as amended) Description .
| |
| f' Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| '6.5-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| . Removes discussion of RWST and Containment Spray flow' rates for consistency. This information was inadvertently not removed when FSAR 6.2.2 was revised in Amend 52.
| |
| Group:.4 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.5-10 .
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the number of nozzles by removing." train A" designation from the description.so it is consistent with Fig 6.2.2-1 sht 1.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 . i
| |
| - -SER/SSER Impact: No 6.5-13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the minumum pH for the Containment sump from 8.6 to 8.5. See justification for page 6.5-8.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.5-14
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Delet'e statement that chemical additive system would be manually isolated upon change over to recirculation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| i_ Based on analysis of postulated scenarios, sufficient Na0H may not be added to maintain minimum equilibrium sump pH above 8.5 before switchover to recirculation phase. Therefore, Na0H addition will be continued until low CAT level has been reached and automatic isolation of the CAT occurs.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER 6.5.2, page 6-22, 3rd paragraph, last sentence is not consistent as a result of this change.
| |
| 6 5-14, 15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes discussion of the CSS actuation since the correct information is contained in FSAR Section 6,2.2.
| |
| Previous revisions have inadvertently not deleted this discussion.
| |
| | |
| i; L . Attachment ~ to TXX-89201-Maly 1, 1989
| |
| !Page 85 of 439-U ,
| |
| FSAR Page i (as amended)' Description '
| |
| : Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 i SER/SSER Impact: No 6.5-15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes redundant information which may result in inconsistencies. For example, the control room habitability is in Sec 6.4, Containment free volume,-
| |
| effective spray volume etc. are in Sec 6.5.2.2.3- ,
| |
| page 6.5-20 and Table 6.5-5. f Group: 4 !
| |
| Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.5-22
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) g Revises the sinole failure and system parameter varia-tion analyses, which have' promulgated from the resolu-tion of SDAR-CP-87-129 " Containment-Spray System pH", ;
| |
| to indicate that operation _of the CSS could result.in variation of containment spray and equilibrium sump pH.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The equilibrium sump pH is calculated to range from 8.5:
| |
| to 9.7, however the variation in spray pH is~ calculated ,
| |
| to range from a low of 4.5 to maximum of 12.25. .
| |
| t The following postulated scenario is conservatively assumed although it.is considered highly unlikely to occur. Assumption:
| |
| 1
| |
| : 1. Both containment spray train in-operation.
| |
| : 2. One ECCS train in operation (with minimum flow).
| |
| : 3. Maximum NaOH eductor performance.
| |
| : 4. Minimum CAT volume injected.
| |
| : 5. Maximum RWST volume injected.
| |
| Consideration of these conditions results in depletion o^f the CAT prior to switchover. Therefore, a low 4.5 pH spray could occur during a limiting duration of ;
| |
| approximately four minutes with'a two train operation.
| |
| This short term transient is not anticipated to prevent the system from performing its intended function since no significant degradation in the overall iodine removal / retention capabilities is expected to occur.
| |
| This condition however is not a concern during the re- i circulation phase.
| |
| The postulated transients which result in high concen-tration spray pH, greater than 10.5 for approximately 40 minutes, are not anticipated to significantly diminish the iodine removal capabilities nor give rise to excessive hydrogen gas evolution from corrosion of aluminum in the containment.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| l
| |
| - .Att'achmen t to TXX-89201
| |
| ' May 1, 1989
| |
| . Page 86'of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description .
| |
| Table 6.5-1 See' Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects footnote to table re: features of the modular exhaust filtration system. Expands the number of units considered as ESF units to four.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The footnote was corrected to reflect the upgrade of two units from non-ESF to ESF, based on the implementa-tion of negative pressure criteria.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.5.1 SER/SSER. Impact: No Table 6.5-1 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 08
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes the HPS from this table to be consistent with the de-classification described in Appendix 1A(B) page 1A(B)-3.
| |
| Group: 3 '
| |
| Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.5-1 See Sheet No'(s):06
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Adds footnote, noting that there are cases where the minimum spacing requirements are not met for the
| |
| ' Definite Mounting Frame Separation Distances,' per the exception taken to Regulatory Guides 1.52 and 1.140.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The footnote clarifies the position taken on the
| |
| ' Definite Mounting Frame Separation Distances' as a result of the additional exception taken to Reg Guides 1.52 and 1.140 in FSAR Appendix 1A(B).
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes-.
| |
| t See SER/SSER Impact for SER Section 6.5.1 per FSAR Change Request Number 89-202.1 (above).
| |
| Table 6.5-1 See Sheet No(s):06, 07 and 08
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Removes column entitled, " Hydrogen Purge Exhaust Atmos-pheric Cleanup System" and makes the table consistent with the added/ revised exceptions to Reg Guide 1.52 as noted on pages 1A(B)-22, 23, 24, 25 & 26.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The column and its contents were deleted due to the declassification of the Hydrogen Purge System to nonsafety.
| |
| 4 mm mm____._ _._ __
| |
| | |
| 'I.
| |
| Attachment to TXX-892'01 May l', 1989
| |
| .Page 87.of 439-FSAR Page (as amended)- Description - ,
| |
| Efforts to make the table consistent with the added/
| |
| revised exceptions to Reg Guide 1.52 are justified in Checklist No. 89-017.1, Items 1, 2 and 4(b).
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.5.1 i SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section'6.5.1 concludes that CPSES is in conform-ance with Reg Guide 1.52. This FSAR change' changes an exception to the Reg Guide and adds others.
| |
| Table 6.5-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises table ~as a result of the analysis performed.
| |
| .See discussions provided for page 6.5-22 and FSAR Table.
| |
| 6.2.2-2.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER 6.5.2 is not consistent as a result of this change.
| |
| Table 6.5-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds the total number of spray nozzles for Unit 1 Region A Train B and the total number of nozzles in-Unit 1 Train B column. This is consistent with FSAR Figure 6.2.2-1 sht 1.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.5.2
| |
| 'SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.5-7 Des'e ription: (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds design basis accidents and their respective refer-ence sections that were previously not included and instead of "None" adds in the Control Room emergency ,
| |
| units which are depended on during these accident -
| |
| scenarios. Also deletes the HPS from this table to be consistent with the de-classification described in Appendix 1A(B) page 1A(B)-3.
| |
| Group: 2 Related FER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No l Figure 6.5-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justi fication:
| |
| Corrects the column entries for Region A ared Total for the number of nozzlws per train as follows:
| |
| 1-From "2'/2" to "274" and from '274-Unit 2" to "272-Unit 1 train A" on Region A. l 2-From "380" to "382" and fro:n "382-Unit 2" to "380- l Unit 1 train A" on the Total column. I This is consistent with FSAR Subsection 6.5.2.2.1.
| |
| 3
| |
| | |
| y3
| |
| - Atta'chment to'TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 . -!
| |
| Page 88 of A39 lK FSAR'Page (as amended) Description Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER impact: No lFigureL6.5-10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)-
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds "trairi A to clarify the description of the number of nozzles provided for Unit 1, Region A, ring header
| |
| : 4. This clarification-is consistent with FSAR Figure 6.2.2-1 sht. 1.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 6.5-10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds the number "60" to the description of the nozzles in Region A, ring tieader 4, train B which face vertically downward. This change is an editorial error inadvertently made during the Amendment 46 process.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.5-10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds " train A" or " train B" to the description of the Region A ring headers 3,2, and 1 to clarify the . train associated with the specific ring elevation. This change is consistent with FSAR Figure 6.2.2-1 sht. 1. 1 Group:4 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/S3ER Impact: No- ,
| |
| i Figure 6.5-11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification: ;
| |
| Corrects the number of spray nozzles provided ac follows:
| |
| 1-From "66" to "67" for the headers in Region 8 and Train A header. This is consistent with Table 6.5.5. >
| |
| 2-From "31" to "32' pointing downward on the train B l header.
| |
| 3-From "28" to "29" pointing downward on the train A header.
| |
| Corrections made to reflect as-b9ilt conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER-Impact: No
| |
| ___2__-- . - - _
| |
| | |
| x ..
| |
| i LAttachmenth to TXX-89201- )
| |
| May 1, 1989
| |
| .Page 89 of 439 -
| |
| : j. ]
| |
| /: FSAR Page j l
| |
| /f (as amended) Description
| |
| ]
| |
| ' Figure 6.5-11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies the number of. spray nozzles provided for-train B by adding "67 spray nozzles with". This is i consistent with.the previous sentence and the format description on train A. Also, the word " approximate" is added for the location of these heaaders, since the {
| |
| train B header elevation is 898 ft 8 in. as shown in.
| |
| Figure 6'.2.2-1 sht. 1. (coord A-2).
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 l SER/SSER Impact: No I
| |
| -6.6-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Inservice Inspection program submittal.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The effective. edition of ASME Section XI is not established until. issuance of an operating license. l Therefore, submittal ~of this Inservice Inspection (ISI). !
| |
| Plan within nine (9) months of the date of the ,
| |
| operating license, in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g), will allow adequate review time by the NRC.
| |
| Group: 3 j Related SER Section: 6.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.1-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrected text to indicate that F7.1-1 is a block diagram and not a single line diagram Group: 4 Related SER Section: 7.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.1-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) -
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes the HPS from item 4,.provides editorial correc-tions and removes statement that the HPS is designed under A-E's specifications.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.1-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes the HPS from the the ESF filter systems to be consistent with.the de-classification described in Appendix 1A(B) page 1A(B)-3.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| | |
| : Attachment.i to TXX-89201'
| |
| - May 1; '1989 lPage.90 of 439 FSAR Page
| |
| , (as' amended) Description .
| |
| 7.1-15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| " ~ Justification:
| |
| The number "279" was inadvertently omitted from the IEEE. Standard and is now being added. Also, editorial correction to change the word "on" to "in". No tecnical change involved.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 7.1.2-SER/SSER Impact: No 7.1-16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Reactor trip signals Justification:
| |
| Clarification of the CPSES reactor trip signals Group: 4 Related SER Section: 7.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.1-17, 18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update) -
| |
| Safety system setpoint study Justification:
| |
| Clarification of the CPSES Technical Specification setpoint terminology with respect to the safety
| |
| -analysis limit, limiting safety system setting and nominal' safety system setting Group: 3 Related.SER Section: 7.3.2.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.1-19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Update to reflect that the CPSES plant specific setpoint study has been completed Group: 2 Related SER Section: 7.3.2.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.1-20
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correctien)
| |
| ESF motor surv6illance Justification:
| |
| Deleted the paragraph which described one method of surveilling ESF pump motors to detect hot spots. This method suggested. removal of'the motor and returning it to.the manufacturer'to verify the existence of hot spots using prototype test results. TV Electric has chosen to surveil these motors using stator resistance type detectors and current versus time characteristic curves to monitor and detect hot spots and motor circuit breaker protection to prevent motor damage.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| | |
| 6 y :.
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 L
| |
| - May 1, 1989 Page'91 of;439 y <
| |
| - FSAR Page.
| |
| (as amended) Description Related SER Section: 7.3 4 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.1-2)
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| References the appropriate FSAR section that pertains e
| |
| to separation of-redundant circuits Group: 4 Related SER Section: 7.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.1-26
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| N-16 power measuring system Justification:
| |
| Update the text to reflect that the N-16 power measuring system has been added to the CPSES process instrumentation and control system.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.1-32, 38
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Equipment which cannot be tested at full reactor power Justification:
| |
| The feedwater splitflow bypass valves were upgraded from being ")assive" to " active"' valves. It has been determined tlat these valves cannot be tested at full power (i.e. closed) to preclude possible steam generator tube failures in the preheater region. In addition, closure of these valves at full power could induce excessive. thermal transients in the nozzle and connecting piping when flow is transferred from the main feedwater line to the auxiliary feedwater nozzle.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 7.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER section 7.2.3 requires updating to reflect the CPSES equipment that cannot be tested at full power to preclude any adverse effect on plant operations or damage to plant equipment.
| |
| 7.1-22, 39 See Page No(s):40
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| . Adds feedwater isolation, preheater and control bypass valves; chilled wtr supply and return header to chilled j wtr recirc pump & instr air to cont'mt isol valves; ventilation chiller CCW supply & discharge control !
| |
| valves; main steam dump valves; gen trip on turb trip Justification:
| |
| Provides additional equipment that cannot be tested at i full reactor power to prevent any adverse effects on !
| |
| | |
| -Attachment. .to TXX-89201' May 1, 1989 Page'92 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description plant operations or plant equipment Group: 2 Related SER Section: 7.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| , 7.1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision).
| |
| L Clarifies that MSIVs are not' prohibited from being partially stroked at full power Justification:
| |
| As. currently stated in the FSAR, these valves are<
| |
| partially stroked only at reduced power levels.
| |
| However, these valves can also be partially stroked at at full power. Therefore,-the term "at. reduced power levels" is being deleted to clarify that partially stroking the MSivs at full power is not prohibited and will not cause an adverse effect on plant operations.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 7.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.1-43
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes the HPS from systems included on each SSII display to be consistent with the de-classification described in Appendix 1A(B)_page 1A(B)-3.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.1-44
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes HPS from the ESF System to be consistent with the declassification discussed in Appendix 1A(B), !
| |
| page 1A(B)-3.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 7.3.1 -
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No I 7.1-45
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Conformance to RG 1.53 for B0P and support systems j Justification:
| |
| Changed description of compliance of BOP and support systems to RG 1.53 (single' failure criterion) to be generic instead of addressing compliance for each system. Each BOP system and support systems are designed to meet the principles of redundancy, t independ^nce, e physical separation and single failure. '
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.1.2 9 SER/SSER Impact: No l
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989' Page 93.'of 439; FSAR'Page-
| |
| _(as amended)- Description.
| |
| 7.1-46, 47 See Page No(s):48
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Response time testing of RTS and ESFAS sensors ;
| |
| Justification: H Update of the.to reflect the CPSES program and methodology for periodically testing the RTS and ESFAS sensors.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 7.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure-7.1-3 See Sheet No(s):05, 19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Update of print ready drawings and editorial corrections. New Reactor Coolant Pressure detector added to figure.
| |
| Group: 4 q SER/SSER Impact: No '
| |
| ~
| |
| Figure 7.1-3 See Sheet No(s):12
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Correction to add locations of Control Room intake rad-iation monitors to figure for Class 1E Instrs. and Acc- 'j ident Monitoring Instrs. '
| |
| Justification: >
| |
| Two Control Room intake radiation monitors were already Class 1E and two have been upgraded to Class lE.
| |
| l Correction adds these monitors to the list in the figure and provides their locations.
| |
| Groun: 3 Rela'ed t SER Section: 11.3 y SER/SSER Impact: No L 7.2-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) l Corrects the equation for the Overtemperature N-16 Trip setpoint. !
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the equation for the Overtemperature N-16 Trip setpoint to be in accordance with the Westinghouse Setpoint Methodology Study for Commanche Peak-Unit 1.
| |
| ' Group: 4 Related SER Section: 7.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.2-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes the term "Tavg" from the list of variable i definitions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes the term "Tavg" from the list of variable definitions for the Overtemperature N-16 Trip setpoint equation. Tavg is not a variable in the equation.
| |
| a_: _ . - _ - _ _ - _ . _ _ _ .
| |
| | |
| ._ .- - _ - _- _. . - = _ ._
| |
| Attachment -to TXX-89201 l 7May 1, 1989 ;
| |
| Page 94 of 439 j l
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) _ Description c
| |
| ' This is in accordance with the Westinghouse Setpoint Methodoloov Study.for Commanche Peak-Unit I and meets the commitment listed in TU Electric letter TXX-89151, dated March 31, 1989. ;
| |
| Group: 4 '
| |
| Related SER Section: 7.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| .7.2-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Added the statement that trie " gain" term of the Overpower N-16 Trip Setpoint equation is equal to zero.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Added the statement that the " gain" term of the Overpower N-16 Trip Setpoint equation is equal to zero.
| |
| The " gain" is a function of the neutron flux difference between the average of the upper two and average of the lower two calibrated ion chauber current readings. ;
| |
| This is consistent with the Westinghouse Setpoint Methodology Study for Connanche Peak-Unit 1. ;
| |
| Group: 4- .
| |
| Related SER Section: 7.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.2-19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes reference to hot leg bypass scoops since they have been removed to eliminate possible flow perturba-tion that m6y affect the measuring accurac i
| |
| detectors.(seedescriptionin_Section5.4)yoftheN-16 .
| |
| Group: 4 j Related SER Section: 7.2.1 ;
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No 7.2-30
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects FSAR to identify that the Overpower N-16 Trip Setpoint is not a variable setpoint.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects Section 7,2.2.2 to identify that the Overpower N-16 Trip Setpoint is not a variable setpoint. This is consistent with the Westinghouse Setpoint Methodology Study for Commanche Peak-Unit 1.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 7.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.2-32
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletes the discussion for resetting the coefficient setpoints in the Overtemperature N-16 function.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes the discussion for resetting the coefficient setpoints in the Overtemperature N-16 function for Condition II transients occurring during operation
| |
| | |
| Mttachment to TXX-89201 !
| |
| May 1, 1989 -1 Page 95 of 439
| |
| {
| |
| FSAR Page !
| |
| (asamended) Description with only 3 RCS loops. This change results from the fact that the CPSES Technical Specifications require the plant to be brought to H0T STANDBY (Mode 3) within 6 hours if less than 4 RCS loops are in operation in-Modes 1 or'2.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.2-3 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Reactor trip instrumentation Justification:
| |
| The instrument range for reactor trip on turbine trip due to turbine low oil pressure was incorrectly stated as 0 to 500 psig. The correct range is 0 to 200 psig.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ' Figure 7.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01, 04, 17
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Updaie)
| |
| Reactor trip drawing update to address source' range flux doubling / boron dilution logic Justification:
| |
| Update of the existing functional diagrams for source range flux doubling and boron dilution to reflect the current plant design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 7.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01, 15, 16, 18 ,
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| -(Correction) l Reactor trip drawing update to address AMSAC Justification:
| |
| Corrects the functiona! diagrams to reflect the I AMSAC control circuitry.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.8 L SER/SSER Impact: Yes
| |
| [ The CPSES AMSAC design has not been reviewed by.the NRC and reflected in an SSER. FSAR section 7.8 provides the textual description of the design.
| |
| Figure 7.2-1 See Sheet No(s):02, 09
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Reactor trip drawing update for shunt trip logic and '
| |
| Tavg indication Justification:
| |
| Update of the drawings to reflect the current plant design and to be consistent with the referenced I
| |
| | |
| : Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| 'Mayc1,.1989 Page 96 of 439
| |
| 'FSAR'Page (as amended) Descriptig Westinghouse (WNES) drawing 7247005. Shows-the correct logic for reactor trip and Tavg indication.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| -Figure 7,2-1 See Sheet No(s):08
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Reactor trip drawing update to correct logic for the radiation monitors Justification:
| |
| Update of the existing functional diagrams to reflect the radiation monitors (for containment air and control room recirculation and isolation) which initiate containment ventilation isolation control room intake duct isolation and emergency filter actuation. This change is consistent with previous changes in a prior amendment to related sections of the FSAR (e.g. 6.4.2 and 9.4.1). See also, justifications 7.3.-25 and -26.).
| |
| Group: 2 .
| |
| Related .SER Section: 7.3.1.9 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER description is incorrect in sections 6.4, 7.3.1.9, and 9.4.1.with respect to which radiation monitors are used for the functions described above.
| |
| Figure 7.2-1 See Sheet No(s):12
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Reactor trip drawing update tc identify the location of pressurizer heater centrols Justification:
| |
| Designation of the control logic for the Group A and Group B heaters for the hot shutdown panel and shutdown transfer panel.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.4 SER/SSER Impacts No Figure 7.2-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes the reference to Overpower N-16 Trips.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects Figure 7.2-2 by deleting the reference to Overpower N-16 Trips. This change is made to ensure consistency with FSAR Change Request 89-279.4, page 7.2-30, and with the Westinghouse Setpoint Methodology Study for Comanche Peak thit 1.
| |
| Group: 4 I Related SER Section: 7.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 :i
| |
| 'May'1, 1989 Page 97.of.'439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description. ,
| |
| 7.3-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes the HPS from the BOP furnished ESF systems to be consistent with the de-classification described in Appendix 1A(B) page lA(B)-3.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 Li- SER/SSER Impact: No 7.3-20
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) '
| |
| , Control room air-conditioning system bypasses Justification:
| |
| Deleted control room air-conditioning system electrical '
| |
| - bypass references to chlorine and sinoke signals. There j are no electrical bypasses associated with these circuits. As a result of a design change, the CPSES chlorination system was replaced by a hypochloride system, such that no gaseous chlorine is available on- 'l site. As a result, the control room intake chlorine detectors were. removed, since they are no' longer .
| |
| required, thereby eliminating associated circuit bypasses. (See also LOCR 89-055 FSAR Sections 6.4 and 9.4).
| |
| In additon, there is no automatic actions upon receipt of a smoke signal in the control room. Manuai action is required to initiate the control room ventilation system. Thus, there are no electrical bypnses associated with a smoke signal.
| |
| Group: 2 o
| |
| Related SER Section: 7.3.1.9 i SER/SSER Impact: Yes j There are several places in Section 7.3 of the !
| |
| SER which references a chlorine detection system and :
| |
| automatic actions upon receipt of a smoke signal in the control room. This information should be updated. l 1
| |
| 7.3-21
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) l Justification:
| |
| Note that the isolation mode of the control room ventilation system is actuated manually, and removes reference to chlorine detectors. See discussions in App 1A(B) & 6.4 for removal of chlorine detectors.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 7.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Sec 7.3.1 is not consistent as a result of this change.
| |
| | |
| . Attachment. 'to=TXX-89201 May 1, 1989.
| |
| Page 98 of.439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description ,
| |
| < 7.3-21, 22
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes the HPS from ESF systems to be consistent with the de-classification described in Appendix 1A(B) page IA(B)-3 Group: 3 Related SER Section:.6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.3-22
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Control r oom emergency. recirculation initiation Justification:
| |
| The control emergency ventilation is not automatically initiated upon receipt of an emergency recirculation signal. Instead, emergency ventilation can only be initiated manually from the control room. This change was previously. reflected in FSAR sections 6.4.2.2 and 9.4.1.3 Group: 2 Related SER~Section: 6.4,9.4' SER/SSER Impact: No ~
| |
| l 7.3-23
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Control room air conditioning automatic emergency recirculation signals Justification:
| |
| " Plant vent discharge stack = radiation Hi" signal no.
| |
| longer provides automatic initiation of the emergency i recirculation mode. Instead, credit is taken for the l redundant Class IE control room intake ducts signals. !
| |
| This change is consistent with previous changes to related FSAR sections 6.4.1.5 and 9.4.1.3 Group: 2 Related SER Section: 7.3.1.9 SER/SSER Impact: Yes Sections 6.4. 7.3.1.9, and 9.4.1 indicate that upon receipt of the stack radiation monitor signal, i
| |
| control room emergency recirculation mode is auto-matically initiated. This is incorrect and should be changed. 4 7.3-26
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification: '
| |
| Corrects typographical error from "models" to " modes".
| |
| l Group: 4
| |
| ) Related SER Section: 7.3.1 .
| |
| I SER/SSER Impact: No !
| |
| l.
| |
| L
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| .May 1, 1989-Page 99 of 439-FSAR Page (as amended) Description.
| |
| 7.3-31, 58
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Bypassed and inoperable status indication component inputs Justification:
| |
| Correction of an error. There are no bypasses associated with the ESF Filter nor UPS Ventilation Systems. Neither system provides an input to the Safety System Inoperable Indication System (SSII) as described in FSAR Section 7.1.2.6.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 7.5.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 7.3-31, 33
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes the HPS from the BOP furnished ESF systems to be consistent with the de-classification described in Appendix 1A(B) page 1A(B)-3.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 "
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No 7.3-38
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Addition of.an existing design feature in the Component Cooling Water System (CCWS) Surge Tank Control System regarding the isolation of the 2 CCWS Safeguards Loops on Empty Level.
| |
| Group: 3 ..
| |
| Related SER Section: 7.3.1.7 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.3-55, 56 See Page No(s):57 and 58
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises the system' description and controls to reflect the automatic temperature control in the Service Water Intake Structure Ventilation System, and makes certain ambient temperature information consistent with Table i 9.4-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Automatic temperature control for Service Water Intake Structure (SWIS) exhaust fans is required to inaintain SWIS area temperature.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No ,
| |
| 7.3-89
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Clarification of ESF actuator control switches Justification:
| |
| Clarification that the control switches for the ESF final actuators (for pumps, valv?s and dampers) are o
| |
| | |
| ~
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1,1989 {
| |
| Page 100 of 439 FSAR Page j (as amended): Description .
| |
| spring-return-to-auto type. However, some of the control switches have a maintained locked position.
| |
| For example, the control switches for the ESF equipment i are normally in the neutral (i.e. auto) position, such j that upon receipt of an ESF signal, the. equipment will-perform its auto function. However, the capability exist for the operator to manually manipulate the ESF equipment (valves and dampers) to an alternate position. j by holding the control switch or on some equipment, j by switching to a maintained locked position. For the !
| |
| equipment with the maintained control switch j capability, the maintained position is the safe i position (i.e. the same position upon receipt.of an ESF {'
| |
| signal). For equipment without a maintained position, the equipment returns to its original position when the )
| |
| control switch is released. For ESF pumps, the above 1 description is applicable except there are no maintained positions. In addition, during the SI sequencer cycle, the control switches can be used to stop the pump (s) if required (i.e. pump malfunctio0, inadvertent operation, etc.). However, if the sequencer cycle is not completed, the pump (s) will restart if~the control switch is released. If the sequencer cycle- is complete, the pump (s) will not restart until SI has been reset.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.3.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7,3-1 See Sheet No(s): Table 7.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deleted the numerical value for the P-11 setpoint and replaced it with the term "P-11 setpoint". In Rev. 1 of the CPSES Setpoint Study, this value changed. To preclude having to update the SAR if this value were to change in the future, P-11 setpoint is being referenced. Future changes to the setpoint values will be reviewed per the Technical Specification requirements.
| |
| Group: 3 Related'SER Section: 7.3.2.6 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.3-4 See Sheet No(s):02, 11 and 14
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the references to design documents listed on the table.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 7.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No l
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| Attachment to'TXX-89201 May 1,-1989 Page.101 of ~439 FSAR Page..
| |
| .(as amended) Description Table 7.3-4 See Sheet No(s):13 and 15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| -(Correction)
| |
| Removes several dampers from the Safety injection Actuation Equipment List.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes dampers from the Safety Injection Actuation Equipment List. The Spent Fuel Pool HX and Pump Room Supply Dampers (X-HV-5785A & X-HV-5792A) and the Control Room Kitchen / Toilet Storage Air Recirculation Damper (X-HV-5859) are manually actuated dampers.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.3.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.3-4 See Sheet No(s):14
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletes Station Service Water Pump recirculation valves.
| |
| Justification: ~
| |
| Deletes Station Service Water Pump (SSW) recirculation line control valves PV-4252 and PV-4253 from table.
| |
| The SSW valves, associated piping, and orifices are being removed. Mini-flow recirculation 'is not normally provided for once-thru systems and is not required for the Station Service Water System to perform its design function.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER states that recirculation loops are provided around the SSW pumps for testing. Pump testing can still be performed without the recirculation lines. This is consistent with FSAR Change Request 89-414.4.
| |
| Table'7.3-5 See Sheet No(s):02 and 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects references to design documents listed on the table.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 7.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.4-13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Bypassed and inoperable status indication component inputs Justification:
| |
| The Residual Heat Removal System (RHRS) description ,
| |
| for cold shutdown indicates that there are no I automatic operational bypasses associated with RHR.
| |
| However, the RHRS provides input to the 5511 display as i
| |
| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ l
| |
| | |
| Attachment .to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 L Page 102 of 439 FSAR Page l' (as amended) Description stated in FSAR Section 7.1.2.6. Thus, the RHRS description is being corrected to reference the-RHR bypasses associated with SSII.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.5.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.4-19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Design criteria for safe reactor shutdown Justification:
| |
| Correction to clarify the CPSES design basis for safe reactor shutdown in the event of control room evacuation. A concurrent Condition !!, 111 or IV event is not considered. This design criteria was provided in the original FSAR, but changed to less specific " design basis accident". This correction restores the more specific description criteria in the FSAR.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 7.4 >
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No .
| |
| 7.4-22
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects discussion regarding the Hot Shutdown Panel.
| |
| ' Justification:
| |
| Identifies that some Train B (Control Room /CSR) equipment not required for alternate shutdown will not be electrically isolated from the rest of the circuitry when the Train A or 8 transfer switch is placed in the " Hot Shutdown Panel" position. This 4 change provides consistency with project design documents.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.4-25
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) .
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarification of CPSES procedures used to establish .
| |
| cold shutdown outside the control room from hot standby I when the cortrol room is uninhabitable for reasons 1 other than a fire in the control room or cable spread room. The term "less than" has been added to indicate that manual operator actions do not necessarily, occur at the specified pressure, but at some value less than the specified value. The specifiel values serve as the threshold value were manual oper .ar action is not I
| |
| required or should not be performed above these values.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.4 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ i
| |
| | |
| Attachment to-TXX-89201
| |
| -May 1, 1989 Page 103 of 439 L
| |
| FSAR Page
| |
| .(as amended) Description-Table 7.4-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Clarifies Note (A).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies Note (A) by changing "Provided for alternate shutdown" to "Available to accomplish the desired action for alternate shutdown during fire". This change is made to prevent any misunderstanding of the-note.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.4-1 See Sheet No(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the type of Hot Shutdown Panel hand switch listed on the table.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the type of switch (HS-2452E) associated with the Turbine Driven AFW Pump Main Steam Header No. 2 Isolation Valve. " Control transfer Switch" was changed to " control switch" to be consistent with approved design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.4-1 See Sheet No(s):05, 06, 07 and 08
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds equipment to the table of instrumentation &
| |
| control located on the Hot Shutdown Panel which is provided for Hot Standby.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds the following equipment to the table of instrumentation & control located on the Hot Shutdown Panel which is provided for Hot Standby:
| |
| : 1) Turbine Driven AFW Pump - Speed Controller
| |
| : 2) Turbine Driven AFW Pump - SpeedI .ndication
| |
| : 3) Turbine Driven AFW Pump Main Steam Header Isolation Valves - Control Switches
| |
| : 4) Turbine Driven AFW Pump to SG - Valve Controllers
| |
| : 5) Motor Driven AFW Pump to SG - Valve Controllers
| |
| : 6) Charging Pump to CVCS Charging and RCP Seals - Flow Indication
| |
| : 7) AFW to Steam Generator - Flow Indication
| |
| : 8) AFW Pumps - Pressure Indication This change provides consistency with the CPSES Operating Procedures and Technical Specifications i 3.3.3.2.1 and 3.3.3.2.2.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.4.1
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May.1, 1989 Page 104 of 439 FSAR Page
| |
| '(as amended) Description-SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.4-2 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes equipment from the list of instrumentation &
| |
| control located on the Hot Shutdown Panel which is provided for Cold Shutdown.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes the following equipment from the list of instrumentation & control located on the Hot Shutdown Panel which is provided for Cold Shutdown:
| |
| : 1) Turbine Driven AFW Pump - Speed Controller
| |
| : 2) Turbine Driven AFW Pump - Speed Indication
| |
| : 3) Turbine Driven AFW Pump Main Steam Header Isolation Valves - Control Switches
| |
| : 4) Turbine Driven AFW Pump to SG - Valve Controllers S) Motor Driven AFW Pump to SG - Valve Controllers
| |
| : 6) Charging Pump to CVCS Charging and RCP Seals - Flow.
| |
| Indication
| |
| : 7) AFW to Steam Generator - Flow Indication ,
| |
| : 8) AFW Pumps - Pressure Indication This change provides consistency with the CPSES Operating Procedures and Technical Specifications 3.3.3.2.1 and 3.3.3.2.2. Although the equipment is being removed from the table, Note (1) identifies that items in Table 7.4-1 are also provided for Cold Shutdown as well as for Hot Standby. The end result is that no actual change is made to the specific equipment provided in the plant for Cold Shutdown.
| |
| Group: 4.
| |
| Related SER Section: 7.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.4-2 See Sheet No(s):02 and 06
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes the reference to Note (A) for some equipment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes the reference to Note (A) for the "6900-V Bus l- 1EA1 - Voltage & Frequency" components and the four "SG PORV control" components. This change provides consistency with the Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 7.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.4-2 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction.)
| |
| Corrects the type of Hot Shutdown Panel control switch listed on the table.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the type of switch (CS-1EA2-2L) associated
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201~
| |
| May.1, 1989 Page 105 of 439 FSAR Page
| |
| -(as amended) Description with the 6900-V Bus 1EA2, alternate offsite source breaker. " Selector switch" changed to " control switch" to be consistent with approved design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.4.2 SER/SSER impact: No 5
| |
| Table 7.4-2 See Sheet No(s):07
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Deletes Note (*).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes Note (*) which identifies-the instrumentation &
| |
| control that has a hand / auto station with built-in transfer device to block control signal and initiate control room local override alarm. FSAR Change 88-860.5 deleted all equipment listings for which Note (*) was applied to. Therefore, the note is unnecessary.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 7.4.1 .
| |
| SER/SSER impact: No Table 7.4-3. See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies Note (A).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies Note (A) by changing "Provided for alternate shutdown" to "Available to accomplish the desired action for alternate shutdown during fire". This change is made to prevent any misunderstanding of the note.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 7.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.4-3 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) '
| |
| Adds Note (A) to certain equipment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Note (A) is added to the hand switches (HS-4524FT &
| |
| HS-4526FT) associated with the non-safety loop return to CCW header isolation valve and the CCW to non-safety loop isolation valve. This change ensures consistency with the Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis. '
| |
| Group: 3-Related SER Section: 7.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.5-18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Added narrow range pressure indicator channels to monitor containment pressure.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To comply with the CPSES T/S requirement of maintaining
| |
| }
| |
| | |
| Attachment .to.TXX-89201
| |
| -May 1, 1989 Page 106 of 439 e FSAR Page (as amended)' Description ~
| |
| containment pressure between -0.3 psig and 1.3 psig inaicated, additional containment pressure channels were added to accurately monitor the T/S change. The range of the additional channels is -5 to 5 psig, which-ii, now the narrow range. The range'previously designated as' narrow range (i.e. -5 to 60 psig).is now considered the. intermediate range for containment' pressure accident monitoring variable.
| |
| Grote: 2 Related SSER Section: SSER12 APP. T SER/SSER Impact: Yes SSER 12 App. T indicates Containment Pressure narrow range es the Type'A accident monitoring variable.
| |
| Table 7.5-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarification of the interfaces for accident monitoring ins t rinentation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarification of the interfaces for accident monitoring instrumentation. -
| |
| Group: 4 SER/SSER impact: No Table 7.5-2 See Sheet No(s): Table 7.5-3,-4,-5,-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Added narrow range pressure indicator channels to monitor containment pressure.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To comply with the CPSES T/S requirement of maintaining _
| |
| containment pressure between -0.3 psig and 1.3 psig indicated, additional containment pressure channels were added to accurately monitt, the T/S change. The range of the additional channels is -5 to 5 psig, which is now the narrow range. The range previously designated as narrow range (i.e. -5 to 60 psig) is now considered the intermediate range for containment pressure accident monitoring variable. In addition provides a ledger of terms for each acronym.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SSER Section: SSER12 APP. T SER/SSER Impact: Yes SSER 12 App. T indicates Containment Pressure narrow range as the Type A accident monitoring variable.
| |
| i Table 7.5-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies name of RCS Pressure Boundary.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarification that the function monitor should be "RCS Pressure Boundary" instead of "RCS Boundary". The former is more descriptive. In addition, provides clarification that the containment radiation level variable pertains to the high range radiation monitors
| |
| | |
| Attachment- to TXX-53201
| |
| .May 1, 19G9 Page 107 of 439 FSAR Page ..
| |
| (as amended) Description which function as a backup variable for monitoring RCS Pressure Boundary.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SSER Section: SSER12 APP. T SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 7.5-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| ' Clarification that containment isolation valv'es do not' include local manual valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarification that the containment isolation valves that monitor the containment boundary rioes not include local manual valves (i.e. non-power operated valves).
| |
| , However remote manual valves are monitored.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SSER Section: SSER12 APP. T SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5-5 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) -
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The feedwater split flow bypass valves have been upgraded to.an active valve status. Although not required by RG 1.97 Rev. 2, these valves are considered CPSES accident monitoring. type 02 variables. Upon auxiliary feedwater (AFW) -initiation, these valver close to ensure adequate AFW flow to the AFW nozzles.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SSER Section: SSER12 App T SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Accident monitoring radiation monitors Justification:
| |
| Table 2 to RG 1.97, Rev 2, designates the variable, '
| |
| Radiation Exposure Rate, as a Type E Category 2 variable under Area Radiation. In.the CPSES plant specific analysis (see CPSES FSAR section 7.5), the Type E key variable for Area Radiation in the control room is Control Room Radiation. For access into the plant, the primary means of assessing area radiological releases is portable monitors. The area radiation fixed monitors are used as backup monitors. Thus, these monitors are Category 3 for CPSES. The category assignment is consisttent with RG 1.97 Rev 3. The ,
| |
| affected monitors are RHR pump room, PASS pump room, i Plant vent stack area and Hot lab area.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SSER Section: SSER12 APP T
| |
| | |
| ._ =- . - _ _ _ _ ___ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ -
| |
| r- Attach' ment to TXX-89201 f May 1, 1989 L
| |
| Page 108 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description SER/SSER Impact: Yes L Area radiation monitors. categorized as E3's are l
| |
| deviations from RG 1.97 Rev 2 and therefore should be added to the SSER 12 Appendix T list L
| |
| Table 7.5-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Revised variable function names.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revised function names to more ' accurately describe what the variables are monitoring.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| -SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Added the variable " Airborne Radiohalogens and Particulate" as a backup Type E3 variable.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Added the variable " Airborne Radiohalogens and Particulate" as a backup Type E3 variable. Reg.
| |
| . Guide 1.97 Rev. 2 requires that this variable be .
| |
| monitored. However, it was not captured in the CPSES FSAR. Thus, it is being added to the accident monitoring design bases in accordance with the Reg.
| |
| Guide.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impcct: No Table 7.5-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarification that containment isolation valves do not include local manual valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarification that the containment isolation valves.
| |
| that monitor the containment boundary does not include local manual valves (i.e. non-power operated valves).
| |
| However remote manual valves are monitored.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SSER Section: SSER12 APP, T SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5-7 See Sheet No(s):02, 04, 15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Accident. monitoring radiation monitors Justification:
| |
| Environmental qualification has been determined to be not applicable to several Category E2 rad monitors.
| |
| These monitors were determined to be in a mild environ-ment for the duration of the event in which they are required to operate. Thus, the requirements of 10CFR50.49 do not apply. The affected monitors are Condenser off-gas; Plant vent effluent radioactivity and flow; Effluent radioactivity and flow-noble gases-areas adjacent to containment; Common plant vent i
| |
| m m_________--___m-. --
| |
| | |
| 6
| |
| ' Attachment 'to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 .
| |
| Page.109 of 439
| |
| !- FSAR Page (as amended) Description
| |
| * including containment purge , auxiliary building and other areas- noble gases, vent flow, particulate and nalogens; main steam line, steam generator blowdown, liquid waste effluent and turbine building' drains.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SSER Section: SSER12 APP T >
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5-7 See Sheet No(s):06
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects Pressurizer heater current qualification requirements.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| i The qualification requirements for the pressurizer heater current is of a higher quality than previously.
| |
| indicated. Pressurizer heater current instrumentation is powered by a IE power. source, and are therefore are required to be environmentally and seismically qualified per the appropriate qualification standards.
| |
| Group: 3 -
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5-7 See Sheet No(s):06
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects description of CVCS valve status instrumentation to indicate that environmental and seismic qualification is required.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The CVCS valve status instrumentation was previously indicated as no qualification required. However, a determination was made that environmental and seismic qualification is required for this instrumentation.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5-7 See Sheet No(s):06, 08, 09,14,18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Clarifies that accident monitoring instrumentation are seismically qualified.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarification that the CVCS Charging System Makeup Flow and Letdown Flow and VCT Level accident. monitoring instrumentation are seismically qualified for pressure boundary integrity, even though the qualification requirements indicate "none" (i .e. no quali fication required). This also applies to SIP and RHR Flow instrumentation; SI accumulation tank pressure; RHR heat exchanger bypass valve status and CCP injection flow instrumentation.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| g Attachment- -to TXX-89201 l
| |
| 'C May 1, 1989' 1 Page.110 of 439 j FSAR Page Description f (as amended) ,
| |
| Table 7.5-7 See Sheet.No(s):07 'l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| l Added the term " bypass" to the title of Main Feedwater Isolation Valve Statu3.
| |
| Group: 4-Related SSER Section: SSER12 APP T SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ' Table 7.5-7 SeeSheetNo(s):07 ;
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) '
| |
| Clarification that the S/G Safety Valve status instrumentation is seismically mounted.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarification.that the S/G Safety Valve status instrumentation is seismically mounted (note 11), even though seismic qualification is not indicated as being required.
| |
| Group: 4 .
| |
| Related SER Section: 3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5-7 See Sheet No(s):07
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The feedwater split flow bypass valves have been upgraded to an active valve status. Although not required by R.G. 1.97 Rev. 2, these valves are con-sidered CPSES accident monitoring type 02 variables.
| |
| Upon auxiliary feedwater (AFW) initiation, these valves close to ensure adequate AFH flow to the AFW nozzles.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SSER Section: SSER12 App T SER/SSER impact: No Tabie 7.5-7 See Sheet No(s):08 and 09
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the tag numbers for the Turbine Stop Valves and ECCS Valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the tag numbers for the Turbine Stop Valves and ECCS Valves.
| |
| Grnup: 4 SFR/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5-7 See Sheat No(s):15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Accident monitoring radiation monitors Justification:
| |
| See discussion for Table 7.5-6 (Revision)
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| | |
| 03 <
| |
| ' Attachment' to TXX-89201' May 1,-1989 Page 111 of-439 i.
| |
| FSAR Page. ,
| |
| b
| |
| -(as amended) . Description' l Related SSER Section: SSER12 APP T E SER/SSER Impact: Yes i See SER discussion for Table 7.5-6 q
| |
| L.. Table 7.5-7 .See Sheet No(s):15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) -
| |
| Clarifies range of portable radiation detection d instrumentation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Portable instrumentation is used to assess Environs Radiation. Clarification, that although portable instrumentation is used "as required", the range of the portable instrumentation complies with the range e
| |
| .specified in Reg. Guide 1.97 Rev. 2.
| |
| Group: 3' SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5-7 SeeSheetNo(s):15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification: -
| |
| Clarification that the control room area radiation monitors listed in the Table as "2 per plant" means that there are 2 shared by both Units 1 and 2.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SSER Section: SSER12 APP 1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5-7 See Sheet No(s):16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) :
| |
| Corrects qualification requirements for RCS Soluble Boron Concentration and Radiation level in Primary Coolant.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The qualification requirements for RCS Soluble Boron Concentration and Radiation level in Primary Coolant i is overstated as EQ and SQ required. As. Category 3 variables, these variables provide backup information.
| |
| In addition, no qualification is required, by definition, for Category 3 variables. This is consister.t with Reg. Guide 1.97 Rev. 2.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No 4 j
| |
| Table 7.5-7 See Sheet No(s):18 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) '
| |
| Clarifies the range for the Plant Vent Effluent Particulate and Halogens portable instrumentation. 'j Justification: l A grab sample is taken, when required, with portable instrumentation and taken to a lab to be analyzed.
| |
| Clarification that the range of the portable ,
| |
| instruments. The range is consistent with the l
| |
| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . a
| |
| | |
| r , c e _
| |
| Attachment lto TXX-89201 _
| |
| May 1, 1989
| |
| ,- Page 112 of 439 L4 i
| |
| FSAR Page
| |
| ,(asamended) Description l
| |
| the provisions of Reg. Guide 1.97 Rev. 2.
| |
| Groupt 3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5 See Sheet No(s):18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Added the variable " Airborne Radiohalogens and. 'l Particulate" as a backup Type E3 variable.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Added the variable " Airborne Radiohalogens and Particulate" as a backup Type E3 variable. Reg.
| |
| Guide 1.97 Rev. 2 requires that this variable be i monitored. However, it was not captured in the CPSES:
| |
| FSAR. Thus, it is being added to the accident-monitoring design bases in accordance with the Reg. J Guide. '
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5 7 See Sheet No(s):19 -
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects qualification requirements for CCP status instrumentation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The qualification requirements for the CCP status instrumentation has been determined to be EQ and 50 This is an upgrade in qualification from the previous requirement.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| . Table 7.5-7 See Sheet No(s):21 i
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Added intermediate (IR) and high (HR) range to the instrument summary data since these acronyms are used throughout the table.
| |
| Group: 4 SER/SSfR Impact: No Table 7.5-7 See Sheet No(s):21, 22
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revisica)
| |
| Accident monitoring radiation monitors Justification:
| |
| Update notes 3, 4 and 9 to reflect that the radiation monitors located in a mild environment for the duration of the event they are required to operate, need not be environmentally qualified.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SSER Section: SSER12 APP T SER/SSER impact: No
| |
| = i
| |
| | |
| ,l .
| |
| Attachment' to TXX-89201, L .
| |
| May 1, 1989 i Page 113 of 439-FSAR Page-
| |
| '(as amended) Description l^ ' Table 7.5-7 St-SheetNo(s):22 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Adds notes 7 and 11 to the table.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Notes 7 and 11 are added to denote _the. qualification requirements of several accident monitoring instruments listed in T7.5-7.
| |
| Group: 4 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.6-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| RPS Inverters IV1PC3 & IV1PC4 reassigned to 1E03'& 1E04 Justification:
| |
| RPS Inverters IV1PC3 & IV1PC4 have been reassigned to DC buses 1E03 & 1E04, respectively. The DC Bus reassignment is required to reduce the load on the battery chargers because the Class 1E chargers have been derated to 225 amps by the vendor.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 .
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER indicates that each Class 1E 125-V DC battery system consists of one battery /two chargers. The current CPSES Class 1E design utilizes two trains of two batteries with 2 chargers per battery.
| |
| 7.6-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Correction to identify the appropriate revision of IEEE Standard 308 and the associated Reg Guide which endorses the Standard. The correct commitment is to IEEE Standard 308-1974 and Reg Guide 1.32.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.6-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction of text for RHR pressure transmitter.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects model type of RHR pressure transmitter to as-built.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.6.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.6-19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction to text for RWST instrumentation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletion of RWST level pen recorder to agree with as-built design.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 7.6.3 1
| |
| | |
| I" !Att'chment a to TXX-89201~
| |
| iMay 1, 1989' Page 114 of 439
| |
| .c ,
| |
| 'r FSAR Page (as amended) Description SER/SSER Impact: No 7.6-31
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Indicates that more than a single low pressure signal can activate an alarm, located at the main control board, that alerts the operator of a break in the CVCS letdown line located outside containment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Two pressur.e switches are provided to detect low CVCS system pressure, each of.which can activate the alarm on the main control board.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 15.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: Yes J
| |
| The SER, in section 15.4.3, should be revised to indi-J.
| |
| cate that the alarm signal (due to a break.in.the CVCS letdown line outside containment) comes from pressure switches located in the CVCS letdown line (and not from a vent radiation monitor).
| |
| ~
| |
| 7.7-14
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Replaces the " ROD BOTTOM R00 DROP" alarm with the correct alarms "ANY R00 AT BOTTOM" and/or ">= 2 R00 AT BOTTOM", There is no " ROD BOTTOM ROD DROP" alarm at CPSES.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.7.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER states that a rod bottom signal for the full-length rods in.the digital rod position system is used to operate a relay, which generates a "R00 BOTTOM R00 DROP" alarm. This is inconsistent with the CPSES design, 7.7-16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the equation which describes the initiation conditions which will result in a rod stop and turbine runback by adding a constant to the equation.
| |
| Group: '3 Related SER Section: 7.7.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.7-16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the equation which describes the initiating conditions which result in a rod stop and turbine run-back. Rod stop and Qsetpoint (i.e. OTN-16 or OPN-16
| |
| ,. reactor trip values) are not equivalent. Instead, rod stop is Osetpoint less a constant value, in addition, deleted the term for 8p. This value has no bearing on
| |
| = = - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
| |
| | |
| p ,
| |
| V. s
| |
| - -Attachment to TXX-89201-I' -May 1, 1989 L 'page 115 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description '
| |
| the equation.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.7.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.7-20
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Identifies that the Rod Control System is needed olong with the Steam Dump System in order for the plant to !
| |
| accept a 50% load rejection without a reactor trip.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| .For.the plant to accept a 50% loed rejection without tripping the reactor, both the Steam Dump System and the Rod Control System are required. The steam dump.
| |
| ste: flow capacity is 40% of full load steam flow at ful'. ioad stearr pressure. The Rod Control System accounts for the remaining 10% capacity by reducing power. This is in accordance with design documents.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.7.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes .
| |
| SER states that the Steam Dump System is designed tot allow the turbine generator to eccept a 50% loss of net load without tripping the reactor.
| |
| 7.7-23
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Identifies that the function of manual point selection of the core exit thermocouple is provided by the ERF computer. Also, clarifies that the Plant Process computer is one of the computers which monitors thermocouple readings.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 7.7.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.7-40
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects terminology regarding the Overtemperature setpoint. CPSES utilizes an N-16 Overtempereture setpoint rather than a Delta T Overtemperature, setpoint.
| |
| Group: 4 i Related SER Section: 7.2.1 l SER/SSER Impact: No 8.1-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Class 1E 125-VDC battery systems description clarified Justification:
| |
| Clarifies description of Class 1E 125-VDC battery systems. Redundancy is between trains of batteries, not between all four independent systems. Revised description is consistent with design and description
| |
| | |
| L Attachment' to TXX-89201.
| |
| May-1, 1989 Page 116 of.439 FSAR Page (as amended). Description in FSAR section 8.3.2.1. This change was previously submitted as an advanced FSAR change by TV Electric letter logged TXX-89029, dated January 23,1989.
| |
| Group: 4 Related-SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER needs to be revised to ensure agreement with the current CPSES battery system design (i.e. there are 2 independent batteries per redundant train).
| |
| t 8.1-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Updates insulated Cable Engineers Association standards P-46-426 and P-54-440 to their current titles and dates.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No' Figure 8.1-1, 2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update) .
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Updates TUCS Transmission Map and TV System Power Grid Map (existing transmission Grid and Planned 345-kV system).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.2.1; SSER3 8.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes Maps show new transmission lines installed since SER was written. Details were previously provided in Amendments 60, 66, 68, and 75.
| |
| 8.2-16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes discussion on deliberate grid voltage reductions by ERCOT.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes discussion en deliberate grid voltage reductions by ERCOT to prevent misinterpretation.
| |
| ERCOT does not plan intentional grid voltage reductions for the sole purpose of load conservation. However, ERCOT does use load reduction as a contingency in emergency or unplanned short supply conditions (i.e., a " CRITICAL" condition 11I short supply).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.2-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects figure for name change of 2ST to Station f Service Transformer and addition of IST, 2ST and connection of XSTi/2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects figure for FSAR Amendment 75 change of name )
| |
| I i
| |
| | |
| ' Attabhment'- to TXX-89201 L -_May 1, 1989. .
| |
| ; Page 117 of 439 i I
| |
| FSAR Page-(as amended) Description for transformer 2ST to Station Service Transformer.
| |
| Corrects figure for FSAR Amendment 66 addition of IST, 2ST and connection of XST1/2 (the spare startup t ransformer) . !
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER has not been updated for installation of the
| |
| . Station Service Transformers. This section is currently being reviewed by the NRC.
| |
| 8.3-17, 18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Revision)-
| |
| < Separation of Class IE MCCs & distribution panels common to both units.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The Class 1E MCCs and distribution panels common to both Units 1 & 2 (shuwn on Figures 8.3-11, 8.3-12, 8.3-14 & 8.3-15A) shall be aligned to be powered ~from Unit 1 only until Unit 2 design, installation, and testing is complete. .
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8. 3.1 -
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No 8.3-23
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the description of the Class 1E motor-operated valve motor protection.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To assure the successful operation of the Class 1E motor-operated valves, the valve protection is not ,
| |
| required to actuate for locked rotor condition. The circuit breakers are provided to protect the valve motors against short circuit conditions only. Should a sustained locked rotor condition occur, the operators will be informed in the control room via an alarm which is connected to a thermal overload relay. -
| |
| Deleted " thermal magnetic", as this is not the only type of circuit breaker utilized at CPSES to accomplish the above functions. Both thermal magnetic and magnetic type circuit breakers have been used at CPSES.
| |
| The thermal and magnetic trip functions of the circuit breakers are designed to allow the valve to complete its safety function. ,
| |
| This change was previously submitted as an advance FSAR change by TU Electric letter logged TXX-89029, dated January 23, 1989.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.2
| |
| | |
| [ Attachment .to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 118 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended)- Description SER/SSER Impact:.Yes The SER identifies the use of thermal magnetic breakers to trip the starter for sustained locked rotor -l conditions. .This is inconsistent with the CPSES design ,
| |
| which utilizes more than one type of breaker and only uses the breakers for short circuit protection.
| |
| 8.3-28 Desc_ription : (Revision)
| |
| Control power for the Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP) breakers is supplied from battery BT105.
| |
| Justification: l Clarifies that contrcl power for the Reactor Coolant i
| |
| Pump (RCP) breakers is supplied.from battery BT105.
| |
| In accordance with Reg. Guide 1.63, the primary and backup protection (RCP breakers & Bus Incoming Supply Greaker, respectively) must obtain control power from different sources.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No .
| |
| .8.3-52
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds use of auxiliary relays and phototransistor coupled pair; for isolation between redundant Class 1E circuits.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds use of auxiliary relays and phototransistor coupled pairs for. isolation between redundant Class'1E circuits. Electrically, Class 1E circuits are equal or i
| |
| superior to non-Class 1E circuits. Physically, Class 1E circuits are subject to more stringent analysis than non-Class 1E circuits. Therefore, devices qualified for non-Class 1E to Class 1E isolation applications
| |
| . provide more than adequate train-to-train isolation.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: Yes Affects NRC review on separation (SER sections 8.4.4 and 8.4.5).
| |
| 8.3-54
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) i Reclassifies lighting panel branch circuit breakers as non-Class 1E. a Justification: i The non-Class 1E AC essential lighting circuits are isolated from their Class 1E power sources by two Class IE breakers in series. The two breakers providing this ;
| |
| separation, as well as the non-Class 1E " boundary", are '
| |
| being moved upstream one breaker to the 480V MCC supply l breaker and the distribution panel main breaker. This !
| |
| significantly reduces the total number of breakers used !
| |
| for non-Class 1E to Class 1E separation.
| |
| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i
| |
| | |
| g
| |
| ) '
| |
| Attachment. to'TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 l Page 119 of 439 1
| |
| )
| |
| FSAR Pag #e
| |
| '(as amended) Description l Group: 2 l Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: Yes ]
| |
| This change affects the ongoing NRC review on separation, j 8.3-60
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) )
| |
| Adds description of " unscheduled" conduit / cable.
| |
| Justification: '] '
| |
| Adds description of " unscheduled"' conduit / cable, y This is conduit / cable which was not given an j alphanumeric identification number and is non-Class 1E. '
| |
| Examples of unscheduled conduit / cable are ,
| |
| Haat Tracing, Cathodic Protection, Neoweld, Communication, Security, Fire Protection, Fire Detection, and branch circuit lighting circuits originating at Lighting Distribution Panels.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 <
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: Yes i SER does not discuss " unscheduled" conduit / cable or-the alphanumeric identification of non-Class.1E cable and raceway. This is consistent with the intent of the SER's safety related review. However, the SER does discuss color coding of non-Class 1E equipment.
| |
| 8.3-62
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Describes the conduit identification utilized for AC Essential Lighting.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| For AC Essential Lighting conduits, which have been declassified as non-Class 1E, the originally-installed color markers are not required to be removed since the conduit number provides the necessary identification.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER states that non Class 1E equipment, raceways, and cables in raceways are not marked by color code and have a black outer jacket.
| |
| 8.3-65
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects description of ampacity limit for cable routing.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| " Minimum" ampacity of control conductors is changed to
| |
| " maximum" ampacity of control conductors since that is i.he limiting factor regarding the routing of 120-VAC or l l 125-VDC cables in AC and DC control raceway systems.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 i I
| |
| | |
| m.
| |
| e ,
| |
| Lhttach' ment to TXX-89201
| |
| ~May11,-1989 L .Page 120 of 439 FSAR Page?
| |
| -(as amended) Description {
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No 8.3-68
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) . .
| |
| f Addition regarding separation between Heliax &.Radlax l radio antenna coaxial cable and Class 1E cable. ;
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Low loss Heliax coaxial antenna lead cable and Radiax.
| |
| radiating coaxia'l transmission cable used in the plant communication systems are.non-Class 1E. The low energy carried by antenna cables is not sufficient to cause internally generated fires in these cables. .Therefore, 1 separation between Class 1E (cables) circuits and these Heliax and Radiax non-Class 1E cables is not required.
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| -Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes
| |
| -Affects current SER review.
| |
| 8.3-70 .
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds Class 1E to non-Class 1E minimum separation .
| |
| requirements to existing discussion.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds minimum separation requirements "between Class 1E and non-Class 1E" circuits. The minimum separation '
| |
| requirements between redundant Class 1E circuits and between Class IE circuits and non-Class 1E circuits are the same (IEEE Standard 384 ' "1, Sections 5.6.2 &
| |
| 5.6.5, as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.75, Rev.1).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 8.3-70
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Expands separation requirement applicability from main control boards to control equipment.
| |
| Justification: '
| |
| Expands the applicability of separation requirements-of the main control boards to encompass control equipment, which is protected against hazards similar.
| |
| to those the main control boards are protected against (Regulatory Guide 1.75, Revision 1, Regulatory Position C.16).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 8.3-70
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds Nuclear Instrumentation System components to list of equipment not requiring internal separation between integrally associated cables.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| For the Class 1E Nuclear Instrumentation System Neutron
| |
| | |
| Attachment .to TXX-89201 May-1, 1989 Page 121 of 439-
| |
| _. FSAR Page J (as amended) Description l Flux Preamplifiers, Signal Processors, and Isolation Expansion Assemblies listed in Table 8.3-10, separation between Class 1E train related cables and Class IE-channel related cables is not required inside each cabinet, sina their circuits are integrally associated with each otuer.
| |
| Group: 3 - -
| |
| Related SER Section: 8.4.4 !
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No l 8.3-70, 71
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds analysis supporting separation requirements between associated circuits and non-Class 1E circuits within fire panels.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Based on analysis, separation between certain associated circuits and non-Class 1E circuits within fire panels CPX-EIPRLV-29, -29A and -30 do not require separation, since the circuits carry low energy fire detection control signals. '
| |
| Group: 2 ~
| |
| Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The additional acalysis affects the ongoing NRC review of the section.
| |
| 8.3-72
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) ,
| |
| Clarifies the specific type cable trays utilized.
| |
| Justification: !
| |
| Adds the word " solid" to distinguish hetween ladder type and solid bottom type cable trays. Solid bottom cable trays provide the required barrier.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SEP/SSER Impact: No 8.3-72
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds Class 1E to non-Class 1E minimum separation requirements to existing discussion.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes the word " redundant" and adds the words
| |
| " requiring separation" to cover the minimum separation requirements between redundant raceways and also between Class 1E and non-Class 1E raceways. This is based on the fact that the minimum separation requirements for both of the above situations are the same (IEEE Standard 384-1974, Section 5.6.2 and 5.6.5, as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.75, Rev. 1).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| g _ - _ - _ - - - - _ - _ _ _ _ .
| |
| Attachment 2 to'TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 122 of 439 FSAR Page .
| |
| (as amended) Description 8.3-72
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Clarifies separation requirements inside equipment for cables which feed power to control equipment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies that #10 AWG or larger cables which feed power to control equipment from distribution panels and power cables inside power equipment are required to maintain 6" separation or be enclosed or separated by a barrier. The less restrictive separation requirements for control and instrumentation cables or raceways inside equipment is not applicable for these higher energy circuits. There are control and instrument cables not used for feeding power which use larger wire sizes such as #10 AWG to reduce signal loss. The larger wire size is not significant due to the lower energy of these circuits.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes Change affects ongoing NRC review. .
| |
| 8.3-72
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletes details regarding approved barriers / enclosures.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Unnecessary details regarding the types of approved barriers and enclosures were deleted.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 8.3-72
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Expands the applicability of separation requirements from panels to equipment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes.the word " panels" and adds the word
| |
| " equipment" to include the separation requirements for equipment, such as panels, relay racks and control boards (Regulatory Guide 1.75, Rev.1, Regulatory Position C.16),
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSLR 1mpact: No 8.3-72
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds that 1" and a barrier form the minimum separation outside of equipment for control and instrumentation cables.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds 1" to discussion of minimum separation for control and instrument cables outside of equipment. Therefore, 1" and a single barrier form the minimum separation for this case. This is consistent with March 17, 1988
| |
| | |
| e Attachment 'to TXX-89201 -
| |
| May 1 -1989
| |
| -Page 123 of.439 FSAR Page (asamended) Description meeting of TV Electric and the NRC.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| 8.3-72
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) !
| |
| Adds separation requirements for Class.1E. power .
| |
| conduits and non-Class IE instrument / control conduits. l Justification: '
| |
| The 1/8" minimum separatio.1 between conduits is j applicable to two cases, when both are redundant !
| |
| control or instrumentation conduits and for Class lE and non-Class IE conduits when the non-Class IE conduit is control or instrumentation. This is based on Ref.
| |
| 41 (Wyle Lab Test Report 48037-02, Section IV, Configuration No. 2, Tests 1 and 2) which demonstrated that cables in condu'it with energy levels of control or instrumentation circuits have no adverse impact on each 'i other when installed per the tested configuration. If '
| |
| the installed configuration has a non-Class IE control or instrumentation conduit, it follows that~the non-Class 1E conduit has no adverse impact on the other conduit irrespective of its function. If the second conduit is a power conduit, its impact on the non-Class 1E conduit is not safety significant.
| |
| Therefore, the separation criteria for two control or instrumentation conduits can be applied to a configuration where only the non-Class 1E conduit is .l control or instrumentation while the other may be I power.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes 1 Change affects ongoing NRC review.
| |
| 8.3-72:
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Clarifies separation requirements for cables feeding power to control equipment through BISCO fire sealant.
| |
| Justification: !
| |
| Control and instrumentation cables which do not feed {
| |
| power and pass through BISCO fire sealant into control j equipment maintain a minimum separation of 1", j regardless of the size of the wire. #10 AWG and ,
| |
| larger cables which pass through BISCO fire sealant and l l
| |
| supply power to control equipment from distribution j panels will maintain a minimum separation of 6", ;
| |
| because of the greater energy levels carried by these '
| |
| cables. The separation requirements inside BISCO fire sealant are conservatively made the same as for the 1 normal atmosphere. l Group: 2 l
| |
| - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ - . _ . l
| |
| | |
| A t tacha.en t. to TXX-89201-LMay 1, 1989
| |
| '.Page 124 of'439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description) -
| |
| o Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: .Yes.
| |
| Change affects ongoing NRC review.
| |
| 8.3-73'
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletes details regarding different types'of approved flex conduit.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Unnecessary detail regarding' the different types of approved flex conduit was deleted. Flexible metallic conduit is already included in the cefinition of enclosed rac'eways.
| |
| Group: 3 Re' lated SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 8.3-83
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revision of the description of the Class IE 125-V battery recharging times.
| |
| Justification: .
| |
| The design basis for battery recharge time was and remains 24 hours. The estimated times of 12 hours are out of date with current design and are deleted.
| |
| Recharge time will exceed 12 hours due to recently derating the capacity of the Class 1E battery chcrgers.
| |
| The design requirement of 24 hours is still met.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section:.8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER 8.3.2 still states actual as well as design times-actual times are out of date/no longer valid.
| |
| 8.3-83
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| - (Correction)
| |
| Correction to battery charger capability description.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Correction made for consistency with FSAR discussion of Regulatory Guide 1.32 (FSAR page 8.3-43).
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Irpact: Yes .
| |
| SER 8.3.2 states that each charger can recharge a l completely discharged battery in 24 hours. FSAR l states that each charger is sized to recharge the )
| |
| battery from its design minumum charge state.
| |
| 8.3 83
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revise maximum battery equalize voltage.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises battery charger equalize voltage range to be in agreement with equalize voltage in the vendor manual.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2
| |
| | |
| L,
| |
| - Attachment to'TXX-89201 ,
| |
| E May 1, 1989 1 Pagell25 of 439 FSAR.Page (as amended)' Description j SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| 8.3-86
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) :
| |
| c IEEE 450-1980 used for battery performance discharge l l test intervals, 1
| |
| ' Justification:
| |
| Corrects the discussion to be consistent with previous-changes in Amendments 49 (section 8.3.2.1.6).and 66 (section 1A(8) - Reg. Guide l'.129) to use IEEE 450-1980 1 instead of~1EEE 308 for performance test intervals.
| |
| Group: 3 Related'SER Section: 8.3.2
| |
| .SER/SSER Impact: No 1 l
| |
| 8.3-88, 96'
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Updates Insulated Cable Engineers Association standards P-46-426 and P-54-440 to their current titles and 2 dates.
| |
| Croup: 3 .
| |
| Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 8.3-96
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects title of IEEE 384-1974 and makes consistent with section 8.1.4.3.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: Yes ,
| |
| Section 8.4.5 quotes IEEE 384-1977 and we are committed to 384-1974. Section is under review by NRC.
| |
| Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Identification of equipment by tag numbers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Equipment is now listed in the tables by tag number in accordance with electrical one line diagrams for better identification. As part of this effort, for two cases, several pieces of equipment have been more appropriately consolidated under one line' item. The Control Room A/C Unit Transformer, Air Conditioning Unit Fan, and Compressor were combined into the Control Room A/C Unit. Likewise, the UPS and Distribution ,
| |
| Room A/C Unit Control Transformer, Compressor, A/C Unit ;
| |
| Fan, and Air Compressor were combined into the UPS and '
| |
| Distribution Room A/C Unit.
| |
| . Group: 4 ,
| |
| Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No ca--_- __ __
| |
| | |
| f q l -
| |
| l lf ~Attachmertu 'to TXX-89201 j H , ;May 1, 1989 ,
| |
| .Page 126 of'439 f7 i
| |
| i l^
| |
| FSAR Page.. 1 (as amended) Description Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-'1B, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| '(Editorial)
| |
| Deleted the column " NUMBER INSTALLED PER UNIT" sinc'e covered by the' addition of tag numbers to tables.
| |
| , Justification:
| |
| L The deletion of the " NUMBER INSTALLED.PER UNIT" column is covered by the inclusion of tag numbers with each component,- The Train B components are described in the tables. The tag numbers for the Train A components are in parentheses. If no Train B component exists, the i
| |
| data provided is for Train A.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: S.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18. T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deleted columns entitled " VOLTS", "FLA", "P.F." and "EFF". .
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The columns entitled " VOLTS", "FLA", "P.F.", and "EFF."
| |
| have been deleted based on the fact that the data found in these columns is used to calculate the values for the columns " DEMAND KVA" and " DEMAND KW" and therefore are details which provide no significant iriformation. The information remains available for review as part of DG loading Calculation and 480V System Load Study Calculation. This level of c!etail is unnecessary in the FSAR.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Se.iion: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Added column " DEMAND KVA".
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The column " DEMAND KVA" is added to reflect the calculated values (based on the demand factor of the equipment) obtained from the DG loading calculations.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-1B, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies the column "H.P. REQUIRED" to " BHP". l Justification:
| |
| The column "H.P. REQUIRED" was changed to " BHP (KW, KVA IF INDICATED)" in order to specifically identify the fact that the values in the column are measures of 1
| |
| | |
| i i ,
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201-May 1, 1989-Page.127 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) pscription brakehersepower(BHP).
| |
| Group: 4 pelated SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact:.No Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Notes were revised and reoriented.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Notes were revised and reoriented to ensure applicability with the component descriptions,
| |
| . consistency between tables and to reflect the velidated design. I Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 i SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Revised order of the loads in the table to match -
| |
| sequencer.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The loads within the table were rearranged in a logical fashion which reflects the start timing of the auto sequencer logic.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarified General Note 2 (c).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| : General Note 2 (c) was changed from " Estimated Flow-Pressure or BHP" to " Based on Actual Oemand" to provide the correct means by which the equipment values for required KW were obtained.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER In' pact: No Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) l Clarified Specific Note 1. !
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Specific Note 1 was clarified in order to more clearly describe the " START TIME" for the various loads listed in the table.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| p Attachment- 'to TXX-89201
| |
| '~
| |
| .May 1; 1989 Page 128 of 439 FSAR Page
| |
| ! -(as amended)' Description Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-1B, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletion of Specific Notes discussing calculation methodology.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletas Specific Notes 12 & 13 (Tables 8.3-1A & 8.3-18) ,
| |
| and Notes 10 & 11 (Table 8.3-2) discussing calculation d methodology because.the information is available in the calculations and this level of detail is not necessary for the FSAR.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 .!
| |
| SER/SSER. Impact: No j Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2
| |
| -Description: (Addition)
| |
| Added a new Specific Note to clarify Demand KW/KVA column.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| A new Specific Note 12 is added to describe how
| |
| " DEMAND KW" or " DEMAND KVA" are calculated. This riote also states that loads shown are for Train 'B' except where otherwise indicated. Train 'A' loads are similar to those listed for Train 'B'.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Added a new Specific Note to clarify load start times for immediately energized loads.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| A new Specific Note 14 is added to provide clarification for those loads which are listed as starting at 10 seconds but are considered as " time zero" sequenced loads. This is due to the fact that the loads are automatically energized upon restoration of the ESF bus.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 !'
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| . Added a new Specific Note to clarify that culmulative load shown is for limiting train.
| |
| Justification: ,
| |
| A new Specific Note 13 is added to provide clarification of the fact that the culmulative load l identified is for Train 'B'. Train 'A' culmulative load q is less and therefore not shcan since Train 'B' is the
| |
| | |
| s JAttachmentL to'TXX-89201
| |
| 'May l','1989:
| |
| [ 'Page'129 of 439 FSAR Page.
| |
| -(as amended)- Description -
| |
| limiting train.
| |
| Group: 3 !
| |
| Related SER Section: 8.3.1 !
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1A '
| |
| See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2:
| |
| g
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Revision).
| |
| Revision to the tables to reflect the validated design. )
| |
| y . Justification: i The following components / loads were added to Tables 8.3-1A & 8.3-18 based on design validation:
| |
| ' 1) Boron Injection Tank Room Exhaust Fans, 2) Boron Injection Tank Room Supply. Fans, .3) Battery Room 117 & ,
| |
| 124 Unit Heater, & 4) Diesel Generator Air Compressor. !
| |
| The following components / loads were added.to Table 8.3-2 based upon design validation: ;
| |
| : 1) Boron Injection Tank Room Exhaust Fans, 2) Boron !
| |
| Injection Tank Room Supply Fans, & 3) Battery Room,117 and 124 Unit Heater. ,
| |
| The following components / loads were deleted from Table 8.3-2 based upon' design validation:
| |
| : 1) Diesel Generator (OG) Fuel Oil Booster Pump, 2) DG Auxiliary Lube Oil Pump, 3) DG Jacket Water Standby Pump, 4) HVAC Chiller Purge Unit,.5) Fire Pump, &
| |
| : 6) Jockey Fire Pump.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1A' See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) j Nameplate ratings revised to reflect the validated design.
| |
| - Justification:
| |
| The following nameplate ratings were changed to reflect the validated design: i
| |
| : 1) Emergency & Security Lighting nameplate rating increased from 170 KVA to 405 KVA, 2) Class 1E Battery Charger nameplate rating decreased form 300 A to 225'A,.
| |
| : 3) Hydrogen Purge Exhaust Fan Filter Heater nameplate ratin only)g, 4)decreased Computer from 30nameplate Inverter KW to 10data KW changed (Table 8.3-18 from 18.7 KW to 7.5 KVA (Table 8.3-2 only),
| |
| : 5) HVAC Centrifugal Water Chiller nameplate rating increased from 126 KW to 154 KW
| |
| : 6) Control Room A/C Unit nameplate rating ,
| |
| increased from 175 KVA to 237.1 KVA, 7) Air Dryer Control Panel FDR nameplate rating increased from 11.5 to 23.5 (Table 8.3-2 only), & 9) UPS and Distribution Room A/C Unit nameplate rating increased
| |
| -m___m._._._____._m_.___ _ __ _ . _ _ _ _ ____ _ . __.m_._ _ _ . _ . . _ . __m._ _ . __ _ _ _ . _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ - . . _ _
| |
| | |
| m 1 I
| |
| i
| |
| ' Attachment to TXX-89201 l May 1, 1989 l Page 130 of 439 1
| |
| FSAR Page
| |
| '(as amended) Description-from 61.7 KVA to 65.7 KVA.
| |
| Group: 2 ]
| |
| j Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial) l Editorial change for " Start Time After SlAS"/" Start '
| |
| Time After Blackout" columns.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To simplify the tables, an editorial change was made to the " Start Time After SIAS"/" Start Time After Blackout" columns by removing the words "as required af ter" for the equipment and incorporating this in the Notes.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) .
| |
| Changes number of instalied equipment based on design validation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| In addition to the overall change in identification of installed equipment, the following lis't identifies changes in the number of installed equipment compared to the previous version of tables, based on the validated design: 1) Primary Plant Vent Exhaust Fans decreased from 16 to 2 per unit,
| |
| : 2) Service Water Intake Structure Fans decreased from 8 to 4 per unit and from 4 to 2 per train, 3) Battery Chargers (Balance of Plant) decreased from 3 to 2 per unit (Table 8.3-2 only), 4) Control Room Radiation Monitoring System Sample Pumps increased from 2 to 4 per unit (Table 8.3-2 only), 5) Reactor Makebp Water Pumps increased from 1 to 2 per unit, & 6) Air Drye'r Control Panel FDR decreased from 4 to 2 per unit (Table 8.3-2 only).
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Rtvised notes for components based upon the design validation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The following are components whose notes changed from Note 4 (' Manually Stopped') to Hote 5 (' Stops Automatically...') based on design validation:
| |
| : 1) Controi Room Pressurization Fan
| |
| : 2) Control Room Emergency Filtration Fan
| |
| | |
| l~
| |
| . Attachment- to TXX-89201'
| |
| -May l,:1989
| |
| 'Page 131 of.439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description
| |
| : 3) Primary Plant Ventilating Exhaust Fan
| |
| : 4) UPS and Distribution Room A/C Unit
| |
| : 5) Control Room A/C Heater
| |
| : 6) Control Room A/C Unit ll'
| |
| -7) Control Room Makeup Supply Fan ~
| |
| 8). Control Room Exhaust Fan
| |
| : 9) Control Room Kitchen and Toilet Exhaust Fan
| |
| .10) Service Water Pumphouse Ventilation Exhaust Fan The following are components whose notes change from i Note 5 to Note 4 based on design validation:
| |
| : 1) Safeguards Building Transformer
| |
| : 2) Reactor Makeup Water Pumps
| |
| : 3) Hydrogen Purge Exhaust Fan Filter Heater (Table (Table 8.3-1B only)
| |
| : 4) Air Dryer Control Panel FDR (Table 8.3-2 only)
| |
| : 5) HVAC Water Chiller (NNS) (Table 8.3-2 only)
| |
| : 6) Positive Displacement Charging Pump Fan Cooler Unit (Table 8.3-2 only)
| |
| : 7) Isolation Transformer for Pressurizer Heaters (Table 8.3-2 only) -
| |
| Group: 3 e Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-18, T8.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Column "KW" changed to " DEMAND KW" and associated loads are revised based on current calculations.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Column "KW" changed to " DEMAND KW" and associated loads are revised based on latest DG loading calculation, 480V System Load Study and approved design changes.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-2 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Air Dryer Control Panel FDR start time revised.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The Air Dryer Control Panel FDR ' START TIME AFTER BLACK 0VT' changed from "as required after 90 secs." to "as required after 10 secs." due to the fact that the Air Dryer Control Panel FOR is fed directly from the MCC. As soon as the diesel power becomes available at 10 seconds, a demand for this load will result in the load being placed on the diesel.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment 'to-TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page'132 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Table 8.3-2 See Sheet No(s):05 & 08
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies the Start Time for several pieces of equipment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Service Water Traveling Screen changed from "as required after 10 seconds" to "as required" since the 10 seconds'is accounted.for in Notes. Also, HVAC Water Chiller (NNS) start time changed.from 100 seconds to 85 seconds due to the fact that an additional delay of up to 15 seconds due to the equipment interlocks had i
| |
| been accounted for in Notes (15) and (20).
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 8.3-2. See Sheet No(s):06
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Diesel Generator Air Compressor start time revised.
| |
| Justification: ~
| |
| The Diesel Generator (DG) Air Compressor ' AUTO SEQUENCER START' changed from a "YES" to a "N0" and the
| |
| ' START TIME AFTER BLACK 0VT' changed from "as required after 10 secs." to "as required after 120 secs." due to the fact that the DG Air Compressors have a manual reset Safety Injection ("S") contact in their controls, permitting manual operation on demand after 120 seconds on a Safety Injection. They also have an automatic reset Loss of Offsite Power (Blackout) contact in their controls permitting operation on demand after 120 seconds on Loss of Offsite Power.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No L Table 8.3-3 See Sheet No(s):01 & 02 .
| |
| L
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects cable voltage rating consistent with the elec-trical specification.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-3 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 21
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Table issued in total in new electronic format.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| l'
| |
| ' Attachment to-Txx-89201 May 1. 1989
| |
| 'Page 133 of 439 e
| |
| FSAR Page-h (as amended) Description '
| |
| Table 8.3-3 See Sheet No(s):01, 02,.03 & 04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds new Transformers IST anti XST1 and XST2 to tables where appropriate. .
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds Station Service Transformer IST and Startup Trans-formers x5T1 and XST2 to " Effects of Failure" where appropri6te for cables and breakers and not'aiready discussed. This is consistent with previous amendments which added the Station Service Transformer.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 8.3-3 See Sheet No(s):04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 12, 13, & 19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds annunciation in Control Room as one of means of'
| |
| " Failure Detection" where applicable.
| |
| Group: 3 .
| |
| L Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-3 See Sheet No(s):05, 06, 07, 14 & 15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds bus lost to " Effects of Failure" for case of backup breaker opening.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-3 See Sheet No(s):05, 06, 07, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 & 19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Redundant " Effects on System" description is deleted.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3 See Sheet No(s):03 & 09
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes flooding as a "Cause of Failure" since the diesel generators are located above flood level and adds loss of contol power as a cause.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No L-__--__- __
| |
| | |
| 1 Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| 'May 1,:1989
| |
| <J~ .Page'134 of 439 FSAR Page ias amended) Description-Table 8.3-3 See Sheet No(s):09 & 10 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies " Effects _of Failure" for tap boxes. 9 Justification: 1 Clarifies " Effects of Failure" for tap boxes since they are located between transformers and the buses and so result in loss of an alternate or preferred source to the bus but not necessarily the transform This ;
| |
| change also corrects a typographical err <.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-3 See She'et No(s):12 & 13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds loss of control power to "Causes of. Failure" for unit substation transformers, l Group: 3 l Related SER Section: 8.3.1 '
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No !
| |
| . Table 8.3-3 See Sheet No(s):13, 15, 16, 17 & 18 l l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) (
| |
| Justification: 1 Adds annunciation as orie of means of " Failure Detec- ,
| |
| tion" where appropriate.
| |
| Group: 3 .
| |
| Related SER Sectfon: 8.3.1 '
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: 7.o i Table 8.3-3 See Sheet No(s):15 & 16 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) '
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects description for 480V Buses (changes ,
| |
| "switchgear" to " bus"). l Group: 4 i Related SER Section: 8.3.1 l SER/SSER Impact: No !
| |
| l ;
| |
| Table 8.3-3 See Sheet No(s):16 & 17 !
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarificatictd Justification:
| |
| )
| |
| Clarifies that cause of loss of power to buses is open- '
| |
| ing of the backup breaker. i Group: 3 i
| |
| Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No m
| |
| L-_______-___--_-_-__ -_.
| |
| | |
| L' , . Attachment! to TxX-89201' May 1, 1989
| |
| ,Page 135 of'439-FSAR Page:.
| |
| -(as amended) Description L
| |
| Table 8.3-3 See Sheet No(s):17, 18 & 19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects " Effects of Failure".for 480V circuit-
| |
| . breakers, since it is an MCC not a " bus" which loses power (changes " bus" to "MCC").
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-3 See Sheet No(s):19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies description for automatic transfer switch for common MCC's for Trains A' and B.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-3 See Sheet No(s):20 & 21
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| * Justification:
| |
| Deletes loss of function from " Failure Detection" for consistency, since this is an indication for all elec-trical components.
| |
| Group:4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Taisle 8.3-4, 4A See Sheet No(s):T8.3-4B, T8.3-4C
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| RPS Inverters IVIPC3 & IVIPC4 reassigned to IED3 & IED4 Justification:
| |
| RPS Inverters IVIPC3 & IVIPC4 have been reassigned to DC buses 1ED3 & IED4, respectively. The DC Bus reassignment is required to reduce the load on the .
| |
| battery chargers because the Class IE chargers have betin derated to 225 amps by the vendor.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER indicates that each Class 1E 125-V DC battery system consists of one battery /two chargers. The current CPSES Class IE design utilizes two trains of two batteries with 2 chargers per battery.
| |
| Table 8.3-7 See Sheet No(s):01 & 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects " Effects of failure" for charger cable.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Although the loads remain energized by the station battery, loss of the cable will result in a loss of
| |
| | |
| Attachment 2 t'o TXX-89201
| |
| ,' May 1, 1989 Page 136 of 439 l.
| |
| l-FSAR Page (as amended) Description 1
| |
| charging, not a momentary loss, since the redundant charger would also be.affected._
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2-SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-7 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Table issued in total due to shifts in text.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No l'
| |
| 1 Table 8.3-7 See Sheet No(s):01, 02 & 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects " Effects on System" for batteries and chargers and their related equipment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects " Effects on System" as failure of a battery will result in the battery charger continuing to carry the load and failure of a battery charger will result in the battery picking up the load or the redundant charger carrying the load.
| |
| Group: 3-Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-7 See Sheet No(s):01, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12 & 15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds fire to "Causes of Failure" for consistency, where appropriate. This fire would be from an internally generated source, not external.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-7 See Sheet No(s):02 & 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies description of fusible switch and circuit breaker by denoting association with the station battery and battery charger, respectively.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No I
| |
| | |
| ' Attachment to TXX-89201-
| |
| :May 1, 1989 .
| |
| Page 137 of 439 '
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description-Table 8.3-7 See Sheet No(s):02, 03 & 04 j
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Corrects " Effects of Failure" for battery & charger circuit breakers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds that backup breaker opens as well as_ adds the bus lost, as applicable, to the " Effects of Failure" for
| |
| ' circuit breakers.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-7 See Sheet No(s):02, 03, 04 & 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies annunciation by deleting Safety System Inop-erable Indication (5511) since it is part of the Control Room annunciation.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 -
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-7 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds inverter designations for clarity to " Function" and " Effects on System."
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-7 See Sheet No(s):06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12 & 13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Editorial change to " Function" and " Effects on System" as should be " single-phase" rather than "one-phase" and, as 118-Vac ac power is redundant, "ac" is deleted and phrase reworded to " single phase power."
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-7 See Sheet No(s):10 & 11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction 5 Justification:
| |
| Corrects function of circuit breakers as these breakers supply power from the inverters to their respective instrument buses.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to.TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 138 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description -
| |
| .. Table 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):02 & 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds associated cables where appropriate to list of cables interial to lighting panels.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds associated cables internal to certain lighting panels to list of cables not requiring internal separation due to being integrally associated.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds non-Class 1E MCCs tc Iist of equipment not reouir-ing internal separation oi integrally associated cables.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds non-Class 1E MCCs not requiring internal separa-tion between associated and non-Class 1E circuits as they are integrally related and are isolated by a Class 1E breaker tripped by an "S" signal.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):04 & 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds Nuclear Instrumentation System components to list of equipment not requiring internal separation between integrally associated cables.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| For the Class 1E Nuclear Instrumentation System Neutron ,
| |
| Flux Preamplifiers, Signal Processors, and Isolation i Expansion Assemblies listed in Table 8.3-10, separation between Class 1E train related cables and Class 1E channel related cables is not required inside each cabinet, since their circuits are integrally associated with each other. Note 1 has figure refer-ence deleted since it no longer applies to all cases.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: f.'o Table 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):04 & 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) '
| |
| Adds fire panels CPX-EIPRLV-29, -29A and -30 to table with new Note 4 to delineate basis.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds fire panels CPX-EIPRLV-29, -29A and -30 to table with new Note 4 to delineate basis. Based on analysis, separation between certain associated circuits and non-
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1,11989 Page.139-of 439 FSAR Page lasamended) Description -
| |
| Class 1E circuits within fire panels CPX-EIPRLV-29,
| |
| -29A and -30 do not require separation, since the circuits carry low energy fire detection control signals.
| |
| Group: 2 Pelated SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The additional analysis affects the ongoing NRC review of this section.
| |
| Table 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Note 3 is clarified with a parenthetical note that the breakers discussed are located upstream of the portion a? the circuit which does not require separation. '
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER impact: No
| |
| ~
| |
| Table 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01 & 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) '
| |
| Clarify equipment identification numbers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarify equipment identification numbers to be consistent with MCC identification numbers shown in other design documents. The detail of the MCC compartment number (12th and 13th digits of equipment number) is deleted from this table.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01 & 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changed the Operational Requirements Note for certain loads.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changed the Operational Requirements Note for Isolation Transformers for Pressurizer Heater Control (Groups-A, B, C & 0) from (2) to (1) based on the design review.
| |
| These loads are required to be operational for loss of offsite power.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01, 02, 09, 10 & 11 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) l Corrects equipment identification numbers and '
| |
| equipment descriptions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| | |
| ~ Attachment .to TXX-89201' Mayf1, 1989-
| |
| 'Page 1.40 of 439-FSAR page
| |
| -(as u.aended) Description-Corrects equipment identification numbers to be consistent with the electrical one line diagrams for.the following components:
| |
| 1)-Isolation Transformers for Pressurizer Heater Control-(Groups- A,''B, C & D) [Sh. 1 & 2]
| |
| : 2) Turbine Driven AFW Pump Control Panel [Sh..-2]
| |
| : 3) Lighting Transformers _(Panels SWP1 & 2) [Sh. 9]
| |
| Corrects equipment descriptions to be consistent with electrical one-line diagrams for the following: components:
| |
| : 1) " AUXILIARY FEED PUMP TURBINE TRIP" changed to
| |
| " TURBINE DRIVEN AFW PUMP CUNTROL PANEL" [Sh.- 2]-
| |
| : 2) Included additional panel numbers for "XFMR FOR LTG-DIST PNLs" [Sh. 10 & 11].
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 5ER/SSER Impact: No Tab'le 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01, 05, 06 & 07
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changed the Operational Requirements note for'certain loads.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changed the Operational Requirements note for Fire.
| |
| Brigade Training / Emergency Fill ~ Pump and Primary Plant Vent Exhaust Fans (9 through'22).from (1) to (7) based on design review. These loads are tripped by both an "S" (SIAS) signal and by bus undervoltage.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 p SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Added Security Lighting:
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Added Security Lighting to table based on design review. These loads are powered from a Class IE source and electrically separated by:two breakers in series coordinated with their upstream supply breaker.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER discusses isolation transformers for the security-related systems which are now isolated by two breakers in series, as described in Section 8.3 and Table 8.3-11.
| |
| 1
| |
| | |
| Attachment *'to TXX-89201' May 1, 1989 Page 141 of 439:
| |
| TSAR Page -
| |
| .(as amended) Description Table 8.3-11 See Sheet. No(s):03, 07 & 11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects typographical errors in equipment-identification numbers.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.'4.5
| |
| , SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s);09
| |
| -Description: (Revision)
| |
| Deleted the Service Water Residual Sample Pump.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| -Deleted the Service Water Residual Sample Pump i from the table based on design review. This load has been removed from the CPSES design.
| |
| Group:-3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3 11 See Sheet No(s):11 & 12
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds the Diesel Generator-Space Heaters and new Note (8).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds Diesel Generator Space Heaters and new Note (8).
| |
| The Safety Injection trip of the circuit breaker provides isolation between the Class 1E Power Supply i and the non-Class 1E load (DG Space Heater). New Note (8) describes when these non-Class 1E loads are isolated from the Class IE power source.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 1 . Table 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):12 l-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Added new note concerning tripping non-essential loads.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Based on design review, added new Note (7) to table to define Operational Requirements and cable classification of specified loads. The load ie tripped by both an "S" (SIAS) signal and bus undervoltage.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects generatorty(pographical 22-kV). error on rating of main Group: 4 -
| |
| l 1 l L_ - __ _-__ -__ -_ _ -_ -- _-__ A
| |
| | |
| e Attachment to'.TXX-89201'
| |
| ,May11,11989 .
| |
| ..Page 142'of 439 q
| |
| ~
| |
| FSAR Page (as' amended). Description Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Removes temporary feeder, changes motor-operated switches to double-throw and adds tag numbers, and adds transformer and generator. ratings.
| |
| -Justification:
| |
| Removes temporary feeder between Tap Box No. 1 and Bus XA1. Changes motor-operated switches.DIST, DXST2 and DXST1/2 from single throw to. double throw and adds tag l' numbers to them. Adds Generator neutral grounding transformer rating and corrects generator voltage rating. These changes reflect the approved design configuration of the plant.
| |
| Group: 3 .
| |
| Related SER Section:.8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Clarifies description for transformers 1ST and 2ST.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The descriptions for Station Service Transformers IST and 2ST have had excess information not provided for the other transformers on the figure deleted.
| |
| These changes provide consistency with the other transformers- on this figure.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Deletes unnecessary symbols from figure.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes numerous circled numbers that have no design mea'ning and are not necessary for the FSAR figure.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Adds title for Tap Box No. 7.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds title for Tap Box No. 7. This change is consistent with the rest of the tap boxes on the figure.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment ? to TXX-89201
| |
| 'May 1, 1989
| |
| 'Page 143 of 439 FSAR Page j (as amended) Description i Figure 8.3-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Deletes stab symbols for the 6.9-kV breakers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The stab symbols are deleted for the 6.9-kV breakers since this level of detail is unnecessary. This change ,
| |
| makes these breaker symbols consistent with other :
| |
| breeker symbols on the figure.
| |
| Group: 4 i Related SER Section: 8.3.1 i SER/SSER Impact: No i Figure 8.3-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The symbol for the double throw switch was added to the 1 iegend.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Spare disconnect switches are corrected to be shown as normally open.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Spare disconnect switches 1DSW1, 1DSW2, 2DSW1, and 2DSW2 are corrected to be shown as normally open.
| |
| This change reflects the approved design configuration of the plant.
| |
| Group: 3 l Related SER Section: 8.3.1 l SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-1, 2 See Sheet No(s):05 thru 15C
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification: .
| |
| Removed # symbol from "MCC #". This was done to be !
| |
| consistent with electrical drawings since the if symbol !
| |
| is no longer used. Repeated MCC description blocks were removed from figures which contained only one MCC i since it is only necessary to give the MCC name once as the figure is clearly marked where continuations are made.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-1, 2 See Sheet No(s):05 thru 15C
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removed notes regarding the Transient Fire Hazards Analysis since this detailed design information is more appropriately maintained in the applicable
| |
| ! calculations.
| |
| 1
| |
| | |
| +
| |
| Attachment / to.TXX-89201.
| |
| !' lMay 1, 1989' N
| |
| .Page 144:of 439; i FSAR Page-iasamended) Description Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-1, 2 See Sheet No(s):05 thru 15C-Devription: (Editorial)-
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Abbreviated the word " sheet" to "sh" in the title blocks of the figures'for consistency.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3;1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| : Figure 8.3-1, 2 See Sheet No(s):05 thru 15C i
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Updates the source drawing numbers in the title blocks of the figures as appropriate.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-1, 2 See Sheet No(s):05 thru 15C
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editori'al)-
| |
| Justification:
| |
| References to project documents such as drawings, NCR's, specifications, etc. were removed as this level of detail i.s unnecessary and impractical to maintain.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-2 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects transfer trip signal for new 138-kV Switchyard.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects destination of transfer trip (transmitter) signal from DeCordova to new 138-kV Switchyard and deletes transfer trip (receiver) f rom Decordova, consistent with Amendment 75, whicn revised FSAR text.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.2.1; SSER3 8.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SSER3, Section 8.2.1 still describes the previous DeCordova lineup. This section is currently under review by the NRC.
| |
| | |
| LAltachment? 'to TXX-89201 '
| |
| :May 1,:1989'
| |
| 'Page'.145 of 439' FSAR'Page b :(as amended) Description Figure'8.3-2 See Sheet No(s):01 ,
| |
| L
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| '(Editorial)
| |
| Corrects typographical error in relay tag numbers.
| |
| l' Justification:
| |
| Corrects relay tag numbers from 94-1,2/94-1,2 to 94-1,2/ST2. This_is an editorial change to correct a typographical. error.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-2 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Combines transformer meters, adds current transformer polarities, and revises transfonner grounding resistance for XST2 and IST. Changes motor-operated.
| |
| disconnect. switches to double-throw.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Transformer XST2'and IST meters are combined together.
| |
| Adds polarities of current transformers and revises grounding resistance of transformers XSTI and XST2.
| |
| Changes motor-operated disconnect switches DXST1/2 and DXST2 from single throw to do'uble throw and DXST1 from double throw to single throw. These changes reflect the approved design configuration of the plant.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: Ne Figure 8.3-2 See Sheet Na(s):01 )
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Relocates transfer trip relays 94-1,2/E8 to Sheet 2 of the figure.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Transfer trip relays 94-1,2/E8 have been relocated to Figure 8.3-2, Sheet 2. This change clarifies the location of these relays in the circuit by relocating them to a more appropriate figure. ~
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-2 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects spare ground switch GXST1/2 connection.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects spare ground switch GXST1/2 connection. This change reflects the approved design configuration of the plant. -
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| 'NttachNenti to TXX-89201-p =May 1,-l1989 K Page-146Lof 439 7
| |
| FSAR Page~-
| |
| , :(as amended) Description Figure 8.3-2 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes incorrect connection of ground switch ~GXST1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Ground switch GXSTI was previously shown twice on the figure. This change deletes the incorrect connection and reflects the approved-design configuration of the plant.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| -Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-2 .See Sheet No(s):01 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) l Corrects tag numbers for XST2 ground overcurrent !
| |
| relays.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the tag numbers for-XST2 ground overcurrent (51G). relays. The X & Y winding relay tag numbers were reversed. This change reflects the approved design configuration of the plant.
| |
| ' Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| Figure 8.3-2 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies the legend for Motor Operated Disconnects.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies the legend for Motor. Operated Disconnects by differentiating between single and double throw !
| |
| switches. This change provides consistency with ')
| |
| changes made to Figure 8.3-1.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8'.3-2 St- Sheet Na(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) ,
| |
| Corrects figure to show existing disconnect switches.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Existing disconnect switches at breaker E8, as already shown on Figure 8.2-3, are added to this figure for clarity. This change corrects the figure to reflect approved design configuration of the plant.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No l
| |
| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l
| |
| | |
| i t .
| |
| 3R Attachments' to TXX-89201 a< May-1,.1989-Page.147~of 439
| |
| 'FSAR Page
| |
| , . , ((asamended) Description Figure 8.3-2 'SeeSheetNo(s):01,02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| ('Jpdate)
| |
| . Adds reley' type for 63/151 and'63/2ST.'
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds relayftype for relays 63/IST and 63/2ST. Changes reflect the approved design configuration of the plant.
| |
| Group:'3
| |
| 'Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-2 SeeSheet.No(s):01,02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Clarifies' description for transformers IST and 2ST and
| |
| - adds polarities for current. transformers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The descriptions for Station Service Transformers IST and 2ST have had excess information on4 figure deleted consistent with Figure 8.3-1. Added polarities for current transformers consistent with plant design.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER-Impact: No Figt:re 8.3-2 See Sheet No(s):02;
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Corrects typographical errors in relay tag numbers and deletes note, Justification:
| |
| Removed the "For continuation see" note from differential relay 87/2VT, and cerrects the relay tag numbers from "S7 2VT" to "87/2VT" and from "87 1UT" to "87/1UT". These changes correct previous typographical errors.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SEk Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-2 See Sheet Ho(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds redundant relays to and corrects tag numbers for the tran:fer trip relays 94-1,2/E8 relocated to Sheet 2 from Sheet 1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The transfer trip relays 94-1,2/E8 that were relocated to Sheet 2 from Sheet I had two redundant breakers added to the circuit and were retagged as 94-1A,B/E8 and 94-2A,B/E8. These changes reflect the !
| |
| approved design configuration of the plant. i G roup': 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| . _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _
| |
| | |
| i Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989-Page 148 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended). Description Figure 8.3-2 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) ]
| |
| Adds breaker symbols for XA1 breakers. ;
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds Drawout symbols for the XA1 bus breakers. This change provides consistency with other 6.9-kV breaker symbols on the figure.
| |
| Group: 4 ;
| |
| Related SER Section: 8.3.1 '
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-2 See Sheet Nc(s):07
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies the legend for Motor Operated Disconnects by differentiating between single and double throw switches.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the legend for. Motor Operated Disconnects by
| |
| -differentiating between single and double throw switches. This change provides consistency with the changes made on Figure 8.3-1..
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-5 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Replaces Unit 2 figure with Unit 1 figure.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Replaces Unit 2 figure with Unit 1 figure. Unit 1 configuration is shown since it will be licensed first.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-5 See Sheet No(s):01, 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds 51M2 relay in phase "B", rewires all 51M2 relays, and adds current transformers and SIM3 relays to startup breaker.,
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds 51M2 relay in phase "B" and rewires all 51M2 relays in conjunction with protection switch for the Reactor Coolant Pumps to provide protection in both cold and hot loop modes of pump operation. Adds current transformers and 51M3 relay to startup breaker for backup protection for Reactor Coolant Pumps.
| |
| Changes are consistant with Section 8.3 discussion under Regulatory Guide 1.63.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| +
| |
| ; Attachment 'to1TXX-89201
| |
| .May.11L1989 ,
| |
| Page(149.of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description.
| |
| .. Figure 8.3-5' See Sheet No(s):02 ,
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) !
| |
| Changes switch IDSW2 position designator.
| |
| Justification: _
| |
| Changes the position designator from N.C. (normally closed) to N.0. (normally open)-for switch 1DSW2. This-change reflects the approved design configuration of-the plant.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section:-8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-5 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Changed relay 27-1T/1A* and 81T/1A* to AGASTAT relays.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changed relay 27-1T/1A* and 81T/1A* to AGASTAT relays per approved design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-6 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds 6.9-kV multiplying relay.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds multiplying relay'27-BX/1EB13. This change reflects the. approved design configuration of the plant.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER-Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| = Figure 8.3-6 See Sheet No(s):01, 02
| |
| (
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) l Revises fuse sizes'and configuration for 1EAl and IEA2 Bus-Potential Transformer loads.
| |
| Justification: . ;
| |
| Revises fuse sizes and configuration for 1EA1 and IEA2 Bus Potential Transformer loads per approved design change..
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-6 See Sheet No(s):01, 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Provide tag numbers for 6.9-kV uniervoltage relays and potential transformers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provides unique tag numbers for undervoltage relays
| |
| | |
| ' Attachment to TXX-89201-
| |
| - -May'1,.1989 0 'Page 150 of'439-FSAR Page (as amended): . Description
| |
| '27A-1,2 and 27AX for 6.9'-kV Bus IEA1. Provides. unique tag number for potential transformers for 6,9-kV Bus 1EA1. These changes are. based on approved design changes. Sheet 3 is updated' consistent with the changes on sheet-1.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER. Impact: No Figure 8.3-6 -See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds multiplying relay.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds. multiplying relay 27-BX/1EB24. This change reflects the approved design configuration of the plant.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-6 SeeSheet.No(s):02,03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Provide tag numbers for 6.9-kV undervoltage relays and potential' transformers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provides unique tag numbers for undervoltage relays 27B-1,2 and 27BX for 6.9-kV Bus 1EA2. Provides unique tag number for potential transformers fer 6.9-kV Bus 1EA2. These changes ~are based on approved design changes. Sheet'3 is updated consistent with the changes on sheet 2. i Group: 4 1 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-6 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Change of relay model numbers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Model numbers changed for Agastat 7000 Series and Westinghouse "ARD" relays due to approved design ;
| |
| changes. '
| |
| Group: 3 )
| |
| Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 1
| |
| Figure 8.3-7 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes XB1 Compartment 4C breaker tag number.
| |
| Justification: 1 480-V Switchgear XB1 Compartment 4C is a " spare". l Since it no longer applies, the breaker tag number is H l
| |
| l I
| |
| = _ _ _ - - . _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - _ \
| |
| | |
| Attachment . toLTXX-89201 LMay-.1, 1989' Page 151 of-439.
| |
| .FSAR Page
| |
| .(asamended) Description deleted.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| .Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-7 SeeSheetNo(s):02'
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds load (Duct Heater) to Switchgear 184 Compartment ..
| |
| 108.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds duct' heater off Compartment-10B in Switchgear.
| |
| 1R4 per approved design change. ,
| |
| Group: 2 R Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-8 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Changes ground resistor tap setting. .
| |
| Justification: 1 Changes ground resistor-tap setting from 92 ohm to 91.5 ohm per approved design change.
| |
| Group: 3-Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-8 SeeSheetNo(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds trip of bus tie breaker BT-1EB13 to relays.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds trip of bus tie brriaker BT-1EB13 to relays !
| |
| 62-1/1FNAV1, 62-1/1FNAV3,.and 62-1/1FNCB1 per approved design change consistant with FSAR Section 8.3 discussion of R.G. 1.63.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-8 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds 62-1 and 59GX relays.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 1he following corrections are made to figure to reflect validated design and vendor documentation: 1. changes prefix for 62 relays to 62-1; 2. Adds relays 62-1X/FNAV1, 62-1X/FNAV3, 62-1X/1FNCB1, 59GX/TIEB1, and 59GX/TIEB3.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| _____._m__ ____._________m________m_ . . _ _ . _._ __
| |
| | |
| t.
| |
| q' ' j
| |
| [. Attachment ~ to TXX-89201' ~
| |
| 4 <
| |
| :j,May 1;.1989:
| |
| Page 152lof 439 3 w -
| |
| (
| |
| q
| |
| :FSAR Page d (as amended). Description -I Figure 8.3-8 SeeSheetNo(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises trip for fire pump' supply breaker XAPEP1 and i p . updates pump's name. .l Justification: .
| |
| 4 Revises trip-for fire pump supply . breaker XAPEP1 from instantaneous only to long delay and. instantaneous. ',
| |
| NFC Volume 2 Paragraph 6.3.4 in not applicable to this.
| |
| pump and,this note deleted. The pump's name is' updated-to " Fire Brigade' Training /Emergenc Fill Pump.'' This design change does not adversely affect the ability to achieve and maintain-safe shutdown and does'not~ alter the Fire Protection Plan as reviewed by the NRC. This.
| |
| change is consistant with the Amendment 75 revision to Table 8.3-9. ,
| |
| Group: 3 .j Related SER Section: 9.5.1 !
| |
| SER/SSER~ Impact: Yes The SER section is under review by the NRC.
| |
| Figure 8.3-8 See Sheet No(s):01 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Revision) '
| |
| 480-V Switchgear 1EB3 Compartment 78 and IEB1 compartment 48 converted from." spare" to " Instrument
| |
| -Compartments".
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 480-V Switchgear 1E83-Compartment 78.and IEB1
| |
| . compartment 4B are converted from " spare" to
| |
| " Instrument Compartments" per approved design change.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-8 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Shows existing alarm relays for Switchgear 1EB1 and 1EB3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Existing alarm relays 59GX/TIEB1 for Switchgear JEB1 and 59GX/T1EB3 for Switchgear 1EB3 are added to the figure. These changes correct the figure to show the approved design configuration of the plant.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 i SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-8 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Revises 62-1 relay tag numbers and adds existing auxiliary relays to figure. l Justification: '
| |
| Revises relay tag numbers from "62" to "62-1" aH adds i
| |
| | |
| IAttachment. ~to TXX-89201; 4 oy :May 1,-1939 iPageil53 of 439'
| |
| : m. -
| |
| g::L FSAR Page
| |
| , (as amended) Depeription E
| |
| already existing auxiliary relays for Compartment
| |
| : l. 3B in Switchgear 1EB1 and Compartments 8B and 98 E in Switchgear 1EB3 .per approved design.
| |
| Group: 3 X >
| |
| Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-8 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds current transducers'in Switchgear 1EBl and 1EB3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds current transducers for ERF Monitoring for
| |
| -Compartment 6D-in Switchgear 1EB1 and Compartment:118.
| |
| 'in Switchgear 1EB3, per approved design change.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No l
| |
| Figure 8.3-8 See SheetJNo(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Revises undervoltage relay tag numbers and adds additional ' auxiliary relays :in Switchgear IEB1
| |
| . Compartment 2A and 1EB3 Compartment 11A.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises undervoltage relay tag numbers and adds suxiliary relays in Compartment 2A of Switchgear 1EB1 and Compartment 11A of Switchgear IEB3 per approved design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-8 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Shows instrument compartments for Switchgear IEB1 and 1EB3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Identifies Compartment 4B on Switchgear 1EB1 and Compartment 78 on Switchgear IEB3 as existing instrument compartments. This change reflects the approved design configuration of the plant.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-8 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Shows existing alarm relays for Switchgear 1EB2 and IEB4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Existing alarm relays 59GX/TIEB2 for Switchgear IEB2
| |
| , and 59GX/TIEB4 for Switchgear 1EB4 are'added to the
| |
| | |
| t
| |
| ' Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| , .May 1, 1989-Page 154 of 439l FSAR Page (as amended). Description i
| |
| figure. This change' reflects the approved design configuration of the plant.
| |
| L . Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-8 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds current transducers in Switchgear 1EB2 and 1EB4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds current transducers for ERF Monitoring for Compartment 5B in Switchgear IEB2 and Compartment 11B-in Switchgear 1EB4, per approved design change.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-8 See Sheet No(s):02 d
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Revises undervoltage relay tag numbers and adds relays i in Switchgear IEB2 Compartment 2A and IEB4 Compartment 11A.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises undervoltage relay tag numbers and adds-auxiliary relays in Compartment 2A of Switchgear IEB2 and Compartment 11A of Switchgear 1EB4 per approved design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-8 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Shows instrument compartments for Switchgear 1EB2 and Switchgear 1EB4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Identifies Compartment 4B on Switchgear IEB2 and Compartments 7B and 10C on Switchgear 1EB4 as existing instrument compartments. This change reflects the approved design configuration of the plant.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| (
| |
| Figure 8.3-8 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Corrects a typographical error.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects a typographical error. BT-1EB24 is the correct identification.
| |
| Group: 4 .
| |
| Related SER Section: 8.3.1 1
| |
| | |
| V kttachment- to TXX-89201 TO 1 May 1 -1989
| |
| .Page' 155 of 439 FSAR Page
| |
| - (as amended) Description SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-9 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds second' circuit breaker to 480-V MCC 1EB1-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds second circuit breaker to 480-V MCC 1EB1-1 Compartment 9E for electrical isolation between Class 1E MCC and non-Class 1E load consistant with FSAR Section 8.3 discussion of R.G. 1.75.
| |
| Group: 3 Related-SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The isolatiun transformer discussed in the SER is no longer an isolation device; the two breakers in series..
| |
| coordinated with their upstream feeder breaker perform this function.
| |
| Figure 8.3-9 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resizes 480-V MCC IEB1-1 breakers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resizes 480-V MCC 1EB1-1 Compartments 2F and 6M breakers from 50AT to 60AT and 30AT to 45AT, respectively, per validated design calculation and approved design change.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-9 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects BCIED1-1 battery charger current.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects BC1ED1-1 battery charger current from 96A to 85A, based on validated design.
| |
| Group: 3 Re16ted SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-9 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Pevised breaker size for IEB1-1 Compartment 3F.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises breaker size for 480-V MCC 1EB1-1 Compartment 3F from 15AT to 20AT to reflect approved design changes. Revision assures proper circuit protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No ,
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| Attachment ':to 'TXX-89201 May!l,'1989 -
| |
| Page 156 of.: 439'-
| |
| y FSAR Page (as amended) Description.
| |
| . Figure 8.3-9 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resizes breakers in 480-V MCC 1EB3-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resizes 480-V MCC 1EB3-1 Compartment-1G.from 40AT to 50AT per validated design calculation and approved design change. 1 Group: 2 l Related SER Secti'on: 8.3.1 j SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-9 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects BC1ED1-2 and BC1ED3-2 battery charger currents.
| |
| ' Justification:
| |
| Corrects BCIED1-2 and BC1ED3-2 battery. charger currents from 96A to 85A, based on validated design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revised breaker size.for 1EB3-1 Compartment 2DL.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| l Revises breaker size for. 480-V MCC 1EB3-1 Compartment l 20L from 70AT to 60AT to reflect. approved design changes. Revision assures proper circuit protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-9 See Sheet Nc(s):02, 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| New loads added to 480-V MCC 1EB3-1 Compartment ICL and IEB2-1 Compartment IFL.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 480-V MCC 1EB3-1 Compartment ICL and 1EB2-1 Compartment 1FL have new loads added per approved design change.
| |
| New loads are 25KW, Class 1E unit heaters for Battery Rooms. The existing 10 KW non-Class 1E unit heaters are deleted.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No ;
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| i Attachment' to TXX-89201~
| |
| May 1, 1989L
| |
| - ;Page'157 of'439-FSAR Page (as amended)_ Description
| |
| < Figure 8.3-9 ' ~ 'SeeSheetNo(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resizes breakers in 480-V MCC 1EB2-1..
| |
| Justification: -
| |
| Resizes 480-V MCC 1EB2.-1 Compartments-1DL, 2F and 9M-
| |
| .from 35AT to 30AT, 50AT.to 60AT and 50AT to 60AT,-
| |
| respectively, per approved design ~ change.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ' Figure 8.3-9 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)'
| |
| Corrects BCIED2-1 and BCIE04-1 battery. charger currents.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects BCIED2-1 and BCIED4-l' battery charger
| |
| -currents.from 96A to'85A, based on validated design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revised breaker size for 1EB2-1 Compartment 5J.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises breaker size for 480-V MCC 1EB2-1 Compartment 5J from 15AT to 20AT to reflect approved design changes. Revision assures proper circuit protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-9 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds new loads (emergency ventilation fans) to Class l 1E 480-V MCC 1EB2-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| New loads are added to 480-V MCC 1EB2-1 Compartments 7M and IM. The new loads are emergency ventilation fans to cool Class 1E MCC 1EB2-1 located in the
| |
| . Safeguards Building Boron Injection Tank Room.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-9 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Replaced circuit breaker with fused switch in 480-V 3 MCC 1EB2-1 Compartment 4F. '
| |
| i Justification: '
| |
| | |
| l _ Attachment Lto TXX-89201
| |
| 'May'=1, 1989 ,.
| |
| Page 1581of 439 FSAR'Page (as amended) Description 480-V MCC 1EB2-1 Compartment 4F circuit breaker is replaced by a fused switch since full load cur' rent is less than 0.66 amps. Change is consistant with Amendment-75 Section 8.3 discussion on MOV protection.
| |
| Group: 3 l Related SER Section: 8.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes M0V protection discussion has been revised in FSAR Amendments 75 and 76.
| |
| Figure 8.3-9 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)-
| |
| Corrects BC1E02-2 and BCIE04-2 battery charger currents.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects BCIED2-2 and BC1E04-2 battery charger currents from 96A to 85A, based on validated design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No-Figure 8,3-9 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resizes breakers in 480-V MCC 1EB4-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resizes 480-V MCC 1EB4-1 Compartments 2M, 10H, 11Bl. and 11E from 30AT to 45AT, 40AT to 50AT, 35AT to 30AT and
| |
| '15AT to 20AT, respectively, per validated design calculation and approved design change.
| |
| Group:-2 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-9 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Removed junction boxes, retagged cables as'non-Class IE, and added trip on safety injection for MCC IEB4-1 Compartments 128 and 12E.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| At MCC IEB4-1 Compartment 12E junction boxes are removed since cable is terminated directly. At MCC 1EB4-1 Compartments 12B and 12E the cables are retagged as non-Class 1E. The corresponding safety injection trip of the circuit breakers provides Class 1E to non-Class 1E separation consistant with Reg. Guide 1.75, as discussed in FSAR Section 8.3.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ l
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May.1, 1989 Page 159 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Figure 8.3-9 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects motor horsepower ratings in MCC lEB4-1 Compartment 8F, 8M & 10M.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects motor horsepower ratings for loads at Compartments 8F, 8M and 10M in MCC lEB4-1 from.1.3 to 1.9HP, 15.5 to 20.78HP and 1.7 to 1.3HP, respectively, per approved design.
| |
| Group: 2 '
| |
| Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):01 Desc riptio.n : (Revision)
| |
| Replaces breaker with a fused disconnect in 480-V MCC 1EB3-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 480-V MCC 1EB3-2 Compartment 3M second circuit breaker is replaced with a fused disconnect since full load current is less than 0.66 amps. Change is consistent with Amendment 75 Section 8.3 discussion of Reg.
| |
| Guide 1.63. '
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/5SER Impact: Yes SER Sections 8.4.1 and 8.4.2 do not discuss differences in protectior, for MOVs below full load current of 0.66 amps. These sections are under review by the NRC.
| |
| Figure 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resizes breakers in 480-V MCC 1EB3-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resizes 480-V MCC 1EB3-2 Compartments 2G, 6F, 6M, 8RF, 9G, 9M and 9RM from 15AT to 20AT, 50AT to 60Ar, 50AT to 60AT, 15AT to 30AT, 15AT to 30AT, 15AT to 30AT and 40AT to 50AT, respectively, per validated design calculation and approved design changes.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Installs higher horsepower motors on MOVs 1-8701A and B.
| |
| Justification: l Installs higher horsepower motors on MOVs 1-8701A and B (from 2.6 to 4 HP) to provide sufficient torque for potential reduced voltage condition per approved design change.
| |
| | |
| Attachment .to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 160 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revised breaker size.s for 1EB3-2 Compartment 9RF.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 480-V MCC 1EB3-2 Compartment 9RF breakers resized from 30AT to 40AT to correspond to validated design.
| |
| Revision assures proper circuit protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: F.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Relocates load from 1EB3-2 Compartment 2BR to Compartments 1BL/1BR.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| On 480-V MCC 1EB3-2 Compartment 2BR the load is removed and compartment marked " Spare". The load is relocated to Compartments IBL/1BR on the same bus. The two breakers provide electrical isolation between Class 1E MCC and non-Class IE loads consistant with FSAR Section 8.3 discussion of Reg. Guide 1.75.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes The isolation transformer discussed in SER Section 8.4.5 is no longer used as the isolation device. The two breakers in series coordinated with their upstream feeder breaker now perform this function.
| |
| Figure 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Updates motor horsepower in MCC 1EB3-2 Compartment 8RM.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Updates motor horsepower at Compartment 8RM in MCC 1EB3-2, per approved design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Replaces breakers with fused disconnect switches in MCC 1EB3-2 Compartment 3G.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Replaces existing circuit breakers with fused disconnect switches at Compartment 3G in MCC 1EB3-2,
| |
| | |
| g 9
| |
| ~
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| :Mayc1, 1989 Page.161 of 439
| |
| .FSAR.Page (as' amended) Description L'' per approved design change, since full load current is less than 0.66 amps. Change is consistent with Amendment 75 Section 8.3 discussion of Reg. Guide 1.63.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Sections 8.4.1 and 8.4.2 do not discuss differences in protection for M0Vs below full load current of 0.66 h amps. These sections are under review by the NRC.
| |
| Figure 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds Safety Injection trip to DG Space Heater circuit breaker.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds Safety Injection trip to circuit breaker.
| |
| associated with the Diesel Generator Space Heaters'to' isolate the non-Class 1E load from the Class.1E Power Supply. This is consistent with FSAR 8.3 and. Reg.
| |
| Guide 1.75.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 .
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-10. See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correct Diesel Generator Starting Air Compressor equipment numbers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects Diesel Generator Starting Air Compressor and Aftercooler equipment numbers per validated design.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revised breaker sizes for IEB4-2 Compartment 8RF.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 480-V MCC 1EB4-2 Compartment 8RF breakers resized from' 30AT to 40AT to correspond to validated design.
| |
| Revision assures proper circuit protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| ttachment' to1TXX-89201-iMay 1,c1989
| |
| 'Page 162'of 439 FSAR'Page..
| |
| (as amended) : Description Figure 8.3-10 : See Sheet No(s):02-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision). .
| |
| Resizes breakers in 480-V MCC 1EB4-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resizes 480-V MCC 1EB4-2 Compartments 1M, 5F, SM,'8G and 8M from 15AT to 30AT, 50AT to 60AT, 50AT-to 60AT, 15AT to 30AT and 15AT to 30AT, respectively, per validated design calculation.and approved design changes.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section:'8.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-10 'SeeSheetNo(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Replaces breaker with a fused disconnect in 480-V MCC-1EB4-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 480-V MCC 1EB4-2 Compartment 2M second circuit breaker is replaced with a fused disconnect since full load current is less than 0.66 amps. . Change is consistent with Amendment 75 Section 8.3 discussion of Reg.
| |
| Guide 1.63.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section 8.4.1 and 8.4.2 do not di.scuss differences in protection for MOV's below full load current of 0.66 amps. These sections are under review by the NRC.
| |
| Figure 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Updates tag numbers for Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Transfer Pumps.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| On 480-V MCC 1EB4-4 Compartments 7F and 8F, the tag numbers for the Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Transfer Pumps are updated for new nameplates.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER impact: No Figure 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Installs higher horsepower motors on MOVs 1-8701A and B.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Installs higher horsepower motors on MOVs'l-8701A and B (from 2.6 to 4 HP) to provide sufficient torque for potential reduced voltage condition per approved design change.
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| | |
| . Attachment. to;TXX-89201; Mayf1, 1989 Page 163 of 439-FSAR Page.
| |
| (as amended) Description Related SER Section:'8.4.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No.
| |
| Figure 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):02-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds "S" signal trip to space heater transformer .
| |
| incoming breaker for 480-V MCC 1EB4-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds "S" signal trip to space heater transformer incoming breaker in Compartment 6C of 480-V' MCC 1EB4-2.
| |
| This provides isolation between Class 1E.MCC,and non-Class 1E loads consistant with Reg.. Guide 1.75 and FSAR Section 8.3.
| |
| L Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-10 See Sheet.No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds new load, Transformer XFS3, to 480-V MCC IEB4-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds new load, Transformer XFS3, to 480-V MCC 1EB4-2 Compar,tment 4B-to provide two breakers in series for electric 61 isolation between IE MCC and non-1E load consistant with FSAR Section 8.3 discussion of Reg.
| |
| Guide 1.75 per approved design change.
| |
| Group: 2 !
| |
| Relates SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The isolation transformer discussed in the SER is no longer an isolation device; the two breakers .in series coordinated with their upstream feeder breaker perform this function.
| |
| Figure 8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds existing junction boxes in MCC 1EB4-4 Compartments 2M and 4M.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds existing junction boxes for feeders at Compartments 2M and 4M in MCC 1EB4-4 per validated design.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure.8.3-10 See Sheet No(s):02 1 Description- (Revision)
| |
| Resizes breaker in MCC 1EB4-4 Compartment 4M.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resizes breaker in Compartment 4M in MCC 1EB4-4 from 125AT to 80AT per approved design change. Change i
| |
| | |
| p 7
| |
| ~"
| |
| | |
| ==Attachment:==
| |
| to TXX-89201
| |
| .May;1,~1989.
| |
| Page.16_4 of.439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description assures proper circuit. protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: .3
| |
| , Related SER Section: 8.3.1 1
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Figure'8.3-11 'See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| L(Revision)-
| |
| Revised breaker sizes for XEB1-2 Compartment-3M and XEB2-2 Compartment 3M.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 480-V MCC XEB1-2 Compartment 3M breaker resized from 400AT to 225AT'with TM to correspond to validated design. 480-V.MCC XEB2-1 Compartment ~3M breaker-resized from 400AT to 225AT with TM to correspond.to validated design. These breakers supply Chilled Water L Pumps 3 and 4. Revision assures proper circuit protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Sectien: 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds second circuit breaker to load on 480-V MCC XEB2-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds second circuit breaker to load on 480-V MCC XEB2-2 Compartments 5BL and 5BR for electrical isolation between Class 1E MCC and non-Class 1E load consistant with FSAR Section 8.3 discussion of Reg. Guide 1.75.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The isolation tranformer discussed in the S'ER is no longer an isolation device. The 2 breakers in series coordinated with their upstream feeder breaker perform this function.
| |
| Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Removes control switches from compartment 7M in MCC XEB1-2 and XEB2-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes control switch from Compartment 7M in MCC XEB1-2 and Compartment 7M in MCC XEB2-2, per approved design change.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| l
| |
| [ Attachment :
| |
| to TXX-89201 May 1,-1989 Page_165 of~439.
| |
| FSAR Page
| |
| -(as amended) Description Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| ~A dds junction box in feeder to MCC XEB2-2 Compartment 2F.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds existing juncti9n box in the feeder at. Compartment 2F in MCC XEB2-2 per validated. design.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01.
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Correction) ..
| |
| Removes control station in MCC XEB2-1 Compartment 6C.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes control station from MCC XEB2-1 Compartment 6C, per approved design.
| |
| Group: 3 P, elated SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| : Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01, 02, 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Separation of Class 1E MCCs & distribution panels connnon to both units.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The auto transfer switch is aligned to power its-associated MCC from the Unit 1 power source and associated wires are disconnected to. support the alignment of common Class 1E MCCs to Unit 1 only until the design, installation, and testing for Unit 2 is complete. New notes (10) & (11) were added for sheets 1 and 2. New notes (11) & (12) were added for sheet.3 to provide additional explanation.of the design change.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Upgrades Control Room radiation monitors to Class 1E.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The existing Control Room radiation monitor sample pumps fed from Compartments IF of 480-V MCC XEB1-1 and l- 6F of 480-V MCC XEB2-1 have been upgraded to Class 1E l per approved design change. Cable is rerouted and retagged as Class 1E. Radiation monitors are also retagged as Class 1E. Adds control switch to circuitry. This provides redundancy and separation for radiation monitors used for Control Room habitability.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER 5ection: 8.4.5
| |
| _ - - _-___--_a_- . _ .
| |
| | |
| h Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 166 of 439 FSAR Page
| |
| _(as amended) Description SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds 'S' (safety injection) trip to breakers for control room ventilation fans.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Approved design change adds 'S' (safety injection) trip i to breakers for control room ventilation f ans (480-V ;
| |
| MCC XEB1-1 Compartments 4E, IJ and 1M and 480-V MCC XEB2-1 Compartments 3E, 6J and 6M). Revision ensures outside air will not enter control room during an emergency recirculation given a single failure.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SIR /55ER Impact: No Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revised breaker sizes for XEB1-1 Compartment 4M and XEB2-1 Compartment 3M.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 480-V MCC XEB1-1 Compartment 4M breaker resized from 400AT to 225AT with TM to correspond to validated design. 480-V MCC XEB2-1 Compartment 3M breaker resized from 400AT to 225 AT with TM to correspond to j validated design. These breakers supply Ventilation Chilled Water Pumps 1 and 2. Revision assures proper circuit protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) 1 Adds load to 480-V MCC XEB-1 Compartment IC.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds load to 480-V MCC XEB1-1 Compartment 1C. This provides a Class 1E power supply to the Control Building Lighting Transformer per approved design change.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No l
| |
| Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Upsizes cable and changed breaker type on power feed to 480-V MCC XEB2-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Feed for 480-V MCC XECS-1 Compartment 3M is changed by L-_-____-__________-_____ _. - _ _ _ _
| |
| | |
| )
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| -May.1; 1989 Page'167 of 439
| |
| . FSAR Page (as amended) Description upsizing cable and changing breaker to GE type THFK 225A per validated design calculation.and approvej design change.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-11 SeeSheetNo(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds second circuit breaker to load on 480-V MCC XEB1-1.
| |
| Justification: . .
| |
| Adds second circuit breaker to load on 480-V MCC.XEB1-1 Compartments 1BL and 1BR for electrical isolation between Class-1E MCC and non-Class 1E' load consistant with FSAR Section 8.3 discussion of Reg. Guide 1.75.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The isolation transformer discussed in the SER is no longer an isolation device; the two breakers in series coordinated with their. upstream feeder breaker perform this function.
| |
| Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds control station and alarm to MCC XEB1-2 Compartment 3G.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds control station and alarm to MCC XEB1-2 Compartment 3G per approved design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Add control switch to MCC XEB3-2 Compartment 3M and MCC XEB4-2 Compartment 3M.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds control switch to MCC XEB3-2 Compartment 3M and MCC XEB4-2 Compartment 3M to provide an alternate location for the operator to start the Spent Fuel Cooling Pumps per approved design change.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No l
| |
| | |
| i 1 A'tt'achment to TXX-8920'1 May 1,-1989-Page 168'of 439
| |
| . FSAR Page- '
| |
| (as amended). Description.
| |
| Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) . .
| |
| Revised breaker sizes for XEB3-2 Compartment 7F and XEB4-2 Compartment 7J.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 480-V MCC XEB3-2 Compartment 7F breaker.resized from
| |
| ~
| |
| 100AT to 110AT to correspond to validated design.
| |
| 480-V MCC XEB4-2 Compartment -7J breaker resized from 100AT to 110AT to correspond to validated design' .
| |
| Revision assures' proper circuit protection and proper -
| |
| coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| -Description: (Addition)
| |
| Adds' breakers to 480-V MCC XEB3-2 Compartments 7CL/7CR and XEB4-2 Compartment 7G.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| In order to add a breaker in series for electrical isolation between Class IE MCC and non-Class 1E loads for isolation transformers,.the following changes are made per approved design changes: ,1. On 480-V MCC XEB3-2 Compartments 7CL/7CR, added~2 new breakers in series, with new load, " Auxiliary Building Isolation Transformer"; and 2. On 480-V MCC XEB4-2 Compartments 7G/7C, added new breaker in series-with existing breaker in 7C. Appropriate notes have been added to help describe installation. This is consistent with FSAR Section 8.3 discussion of Reg. Guide 1.75.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The isolation transformer discussed in SER Section L 8.4.5 is no longer used as the isolation device. The two breakers in series coordinated with their upstream feeder breaker perform this function.
| |
| Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):03-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) p Replaces breaker with fused switch in 480-V MCC XEB3-2.
| |
| L Justification:
| |
| 480-V MCC XEB3-2 Compartment 2C circuit breaker is replaced by fused switch since full load current is less than 0.66 amps. Change is consistent with j Amendment 75 Section 8.3 discussion of M0V protection. !
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.2 l-
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 169 of 439 FSAR Page lasamended) Description SER/SSER Impact: Yes i MOV protection discussion has been revised in Amendments 75 and 76.
| |
| Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds existing breaker and Isolation Transformer TXEC1 at compartment 70R and adds additional breaker at compartment 70L in MCC XEB3-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds existing breaker and Isolation Transformer TXEC1 at compartment 7DR and adds additional breaker at compartment 70L in MCC XEB3-2 for isolation between Class 1E bus and non-Class 1E load, per approved design change. This is consistent with FSAR Section 8.3 discussion of Reg. Guide 1.75.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: Yes Isolation transformer is no longer used for separation.
| |
| Two breakers in series coordinated with upstream breaker provide separation.
| |
| Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds local control station in MCC XEB4-2 and XEB3-2, and deletes control station in MCC XEB4-2 nad XEB3-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds a local control station at Compartments 3M and 6M' in MCC XEB4-2 and Compartment 3M in MCC XEB3-2, per approved design. Also removes local control station from Compartments 2C and 60 in MCC XEB4-2 and Compartments 2C and 6F in MCC XEB3-2, per approved design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects motor horsepower rat ng in MCC XEB4-2 Comparta.ents 2C and 60.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects motor horsepower rating from 0.125 to 0.162HP in Compartments 2C and 6D in MCC XEB4-2, per validated design.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment 'to.TXX.89201 May 1, 1989:
| |
| , Page 170'of 439-
| |
| 'FSAR Page .
| |
| (as amended) Description Figur.e'8.3-12 See Sheet No(s):01-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correct Diesel Generator Starting Air Compressor
| |
| . equipment numbers.
| |
| .. - Justification:
| |
| V Corrects Diesel Generator Starting Air Compressor Aftercooler equipment numbers per validated design.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1-SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-12 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects feeder cable tag number for 480-V MCC 1EB3-4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 480-V.MCC 1EB3-4 feeder. cable tag number is corrected to match design drawings.
| |
| Group: 4-Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-12 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Updates tag numbers for the Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Transfer Pumps.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| On 480-V MCC 1E83-4 Compartments 7F and 8F, the tag numbers for the Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Transfer Pumps are updated for new nameplates.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-12 See Sheet No(s).01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) l Resizes breaker in 480-V MCC 1EB3-3.
| |
| _ Justification:
| |
| u Resizes breaker in 480-V MCC 1EB3-3 Compartment 2E for breaker coordination per approved design change (changed from 400AT to 150AT).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-12 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds Safety Injection trip to DG Space Heater circuit breaker.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds Safety Injection trip to circuit breaker I associated with the Diesel Generator Space Heaters to ,
| |
| isolate the non-Class 1E load from the Class 1E Power
| |
| | |
| f:
| |
| .. Attachment' to TXX-89201 May,1, 1989 Page 171 of 439 FSAR Page~.
| |
| (as amended)' Description Supply. This is consistent'with FSAR 8.3 and Reg.
| |
| Guide 1.75.
| |
| ; Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-12 See. Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds load (Lighting Panel) in MCC 1EB3-3 Compartment IJ.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| g Adds load (Lighting Panel 54) at Compartment IJ in MCC
| |
| '1EB3-3, per approved design change.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-12 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02 ;
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| . Separation of Class-1E MCCs & distribution panels common to both units.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The auto transfer switch is aligned to-power its associated MCC from the Unit 1 power source and associated wires are disconnected to sunport the alignment of common Class 1E MCCs to Unit 1 only until design, installation, and testing for Unit 2 is complete. New note (12) was added to sheet I while new note (11) was added to sheet 2-to provide additional.
| |
| explanation of the design change. !
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-12 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletes load (Service Water Sample Pump) from MCC XEB4-3 Compartment 5ML.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes load (Service Water Sample Pump) from MCC XEB4-3 Compartment SML, per approved design change.
| |
| Group: S Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-12 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resizes breaker in 480-V MCC 1EB4-3.
| |
| Justification: i Resizes breaker in 480-V MCC 1EB4-3 Compartment 2E for i breaker coordination per approved design change (changed from 400AT to 150AT).
| |
| | |
| /
| |
| ,-Attachment to'TXX-89201.
| |
| 'May 1,.1989 l Page.172 of-439 1'
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1-SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-13 See Sheet.No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds Miscellaneous Signal panels to TXEC3 and TXEC4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds. Miscellaneous' Signal panels to transformers TXEC3 and TXEC4, per approved design change.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1
| |
| ~SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-13 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Determinate Unit 2 cables for panels XED1-1 and XED2-1 and adds note number 11.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Determinate Unit 2 cables at the transfer switches for panels XE01-1 and XED2-1 (and adds' associated note:
| |
| 11 to the figure) to separate Unit 2 loads from Unit 1
| |
| ~
| |
| Class 1E loads until Unit:2 design, installation, and testing is complete.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-13 See Sheet No(s):01, 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| RPS Inverters IV1PC3'& IV1PC4 reassigned to IED3 & 1ED4 Justification:
| |
| RPS Inverters IV1PC3 & IVIPC4 have been reassigned for DC buses 1ED3 & IED4, respectively. The bus reassignment is required to reduce the load on the battery chargers because the Class 1E chargers have been derated to 225 amps by the vendor.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER indicates that each Class 1E 125-V DC battery system consists of one battery /two chargers. The current CPSES Class 1E design utilizes two trains of two batteries with 2 chargers per battery.
| |
| Figure 8.3-13 See Sheet No(s) 01, 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds Control Room DC Emergency Lighting Power Supply System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds Control Room DC Emergency Lighting Power Supply System per approved design change and consistant with
| |
| | |
| 1 Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| ;May 1, 1989 1Page 173 of 439 FSAR Page-(as amended) Description FSAR Amendment 66 change to text.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.5.3 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER.Section 9.5.3 is currently under review for reclassification of the DC Emergency' Lighting System to Non-Class IE. .As part of this change, the.DC Emergency Lighting System is to be powered by separate Non-Class 1E batteries'.
| |
| Fig ~ure 8.3-13 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| -(Editorial)
| |
| Deletes junction boxes from feeder to panels-2ECl-1, 2EC2-11and 2EC3-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| ' Deletes junction' boxes from feeder to panels 2ECl-1, . 1 2EC2-1, 2EC3-2. This change deletes unnecessary detail from the FSAR' figure in order to clarify the figure.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-14 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resized breakers in Distribution Panels XED1-1 and 1ED1-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resized breakers in Distribution Panel XED1-1 Positions 8, 9 and 10 from 20A to 15A per validated design calculation _and approved design change. Resized breakers in Distribution Panel 1ED1-2 Positions 9 and 10 from 20A to 15A per validated design calculation i and approved design change. Revision assures proper protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-14 See Sheet No(s):01 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)-
| |
| Resized breaker in Distribution Panel IED1-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resized breaker in Distribution Panel 1E01-2 Position 8 from 20A to 15A per approved design change to provide proper electric penetration assembly / feeder cable protection.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No i
| |
| r
| |
| ---,--__-x_ x_---------_-----_--- - - -- . _ _ . - - . - - _ . _ . . _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . _ . - . - - - - , - - - , - - - - _ -- ._ ---,--.--x-- _ _-- _
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May_1, 1989 Page 174 of 439 FSAP. Page (as amended) Description Figure 8.3-14 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resizes breakers in Distribution Panels 1ED1-1 and XED1-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resizes breakers from 20A to 15A in Distribution Panel IED1-1 Position 14 and Distribution Panel XED1-1 Position 1, 8, 9 and 10, per approved design. Change assures proper circuit prctection and proper coordination of protection devices. ;
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 I SER/SSER Impact: No l Figure 8.3-14 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Separation of Class 1E MCCs & distribution panels common to both units.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The aato transfer switch is aligned to power its associated panel from the Unit 1 power source (normal position) and associated wire is disconnected to support the alignment of common Class 1E distribution panels to Unit 1 only until the design, installation, and testing for Unit 2 is complete. New notes (11) &
| |
| (12) added to provide additional explanation about the design change.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-14 See Sheet No(s):01, 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| RPS Inverters IV1PC3 & IVIPC4 reassigned to IED3 & 1004 Justification:
| |
| RPS Inverters IVIPC3 & IV1PC4 have been reassigned to DC buses 1ED3 & 1ED4, respectively. The DC Bus reassignment is required to reduce the load on the battery chargers because the Class 1E chargers have been derated to 225 amps by the vendor.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER indicates that each Class IE 125-V DC battery system consists of one battery /two chargers. 1he current CPSES Class 1E design utilizes two trains of two batteries with 2 chargers per battery.
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1,.1989 ,
| |
| Page 175 of 439
| |
| .FSAR Page (as amended) Description Figure 8.3-14 See Sneet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resized breakers in Distribution Panels XED2-1 and 1ED2-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resized breakers in Distribution Panel XED2-1 Positions 8, 9 and 10 fiom 20A to 15A per validated design calculation and approved design change. Resized breakers in Distribution Panel 1ED2-2 Position 7 from 20A to 15A per validated design calculation and approved design change. Revi.; ion assures proper protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 3 Related.SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-14 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resizes breakers in Distribution Panels 1ED2-1 and 1ED2-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resizes breakers fr.m 20A to 15A in Distribution Panel 1ED2-2 Position 12 and from 25A to 15A in Distribution Panel 1ED2-1 Position 17, per approved design changes. Change assures proper circuit protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-14A See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resized D.C. Emergency Lube Oil Pump breaker (102/2-13).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resized D.C. Emergency Lube Oil Pump breaker (102/2-13) from 800A to 900A per design basis calculation and documentation. Revision assures proper circuit protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-14A See Sheet No(s):01 '
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resizes breakers in Distribution Panels XD2-3 and 102-3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resizes breakers from 20A to 15A in Distribution
| |
| | |
| 'f .t Attachment.2 to.TXX-89201 May/1, 1989 . .
| |
| Page.176 of 439 lFSAR Page (as amended).- ~ Description -
| |
| Panel XD2-3 Position 8 and Distribution Panel 102-3 Positions 7 and 10, perLapproved design changes.
| |
| Change ~ assures proper circuit protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group:'3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8'.3-14A' See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update) .
| |
| Updates figure by adding Panel 102-1-1 and-loads to nanels 1D2-1 and XD2-2 for Station Service Transformer J IST installation. -
| |
| Justification: '
| |
| Updates figure by adding Panel 102-1-1 and loads to Panel 102-1 Circuit 5 and Panel XD2-2 Circuits 3, 4 and
| |
| '14 for Station Service Transformer IST installation, per approved design change.
| |
| Group: 2.
| |
| Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-14A See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) . .
| |
| Deletes DC lighting load and shifts another load between two circuits on Panel 102-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes DC lightinu load'from Circuit 6 and shifts: load from Circuit 5 to Circuit 6 in Panel 102-1, per approved design changes.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-15 .See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| RPS Inverters IV1PC3 & IVIPC4 reassigned to 1ED3 & 1ED4 Justification:
| |
| RPS Inverters IVIPC3 & IV1PC4 have be~en reassigned to DC buses 1E03 & 1ED4, respectively. The DC. Bus reassignment is required to reduce the load on the battery chargers because the Class 1E chargers been derated to 225 amps by the vendor.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/S$ER Impact: Yes SER indicates that each Class 1E 125-V DC battery system consists of one bat tery/two chargers. The current CPSES Class 1E design utilizes two trains of g two batteries with 2 chargers per battery.
| |
| L E
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989' Page 177 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Figure 8.3-15 See Sheet No(s):01, 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Replaces existing 15A breakers with fast-acting 20A fuses in Panels 1PCl-1, IPC2-1, 1PC3-1 and IPC4-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Replaces existing 15A breakers with two fast-acting 20A fuses in series for Panels 1PCI-1, IPC2-1, IPC3-1 and 1PC4-1, to provide coordination with inverter i output breaker.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15 See Sheet No(s):01, 02, 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Splits Figure 8.3-15 into three sheets and relocates subpanels to the same sheet their associated feeder panel is on, rearranges details and revises notes appropriately.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Splits Figure 8.3-15 Sheet 1 into two sheets and moves Sheet 2 to Sheet 3. Relocates subpanels to the same sheet their associated feeder panel is on. Rearranges details and revises notes as applicable. This change is made to make the figure easier to read.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resized breakers in Distribution Panelboards 1EC1 and 1EC2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resized breakers in Distribution Panelboard IEC1 Position 7 from 20A to 15A and in Distribution Panelboard 1EC2 Positions 4 and 7 from 20A to 15A per approved design change to provide' proper electric penetration assembly / feeder cable protection.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-15 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds existing junction boxes to figure.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds existing junction boxes JB1A/42790 and JB1A/42890 to figure per validated design.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No I
| |
| | |
| >+
| |
| s o
| |
| Attachment ,:to'TXX-89201 1
| |
| May.l', 1989 Page'178 of 439 i.
| |
| FSAR Page-(as' amended)' Description L
| |
| : Figure 8.3215 SeeSheetNo(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resizes breakers in Panels 1EC2 and'1EC1.
| |
| . Justification:
| |
| Resizes breakers from 20A to 15A at Circuits 1, 3'and 9 in Panel 1EC2 and Circuits 1, 3, 8 and 9 in Panel:
| |
| .1EC1, per approved design change. Revision assures proper circuit protection and proper coordination of -
| |
| protection devices.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision). . .
| |
| -Adds termination rack in Panels IEC2 and-1EC3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| ' Adds Termination Rack 1-TC-42 at Circuit 8 in Panel
| |
| . 1EC2 and 1-TC-41 at Circuit 12 in Panel 1EC3, per approved design change.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| -Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15 SeeSheetNo(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resized circuit breaker in Panel IEC1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resized circuit breaker from 20A to 15A at Circuit 7 in Panel 1EC1 per approved design change.
| |
| Revision assures proper circuit protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15A See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects power supplies for Panelboards XEC1 and XEC2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects figure for new power supply for Panelboard XEC1 consistant with changes to Figure 8.3-11 (Sh. 3).
| |
| Corrects cable identification numbers. Corrects figure for new power supply compartments for XEC3-3 and Panelboard XEC2 consistant with changes to Figures 8.3-11 (Sh. 2) and (Sh. 1), respectively. The new power supply configurations are consistant with FSAR Section 8.3 discussion of Reg. Guide 1.75.
| |
| - Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.5
| |
| | |
| lg 1 ,, .,
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 l cMay:1, 1989 Page'179'of 439 FSAR.Page
| |
| -(as amended)~ Description SER/SSER Impact: Yes . .
| |
| The isolation transformers have been provided with two breakers in series upstream for. isolation of non-Class 1E loads from Class'1E MCC.(See FSAR Change Request 88-988.3).
| |
| Figure 8.3-15A. See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision).
| |
| Adds load to Panel XEC1 and XEC2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds load at Circuit 31 in Panel XEC1'and at Circuits
| |
| '3 and 20 in Panel XEC2, per approved design. l droup: 2 Related SER Section:'8.3.1 SER/SSER~ Impact: No-Figure'8.3-15A 'See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision).
| |
| Shifted loads between circuits in Panel XEC2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Shifted loads between Circuits 24 and 26 in Panel XEC2, per approved design. I Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| . Figure 8.3-15A See Sheet No(s):01 !
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds an automatic transfer switch for Distribution L Panel XEC2-7. !
| |
| Justification: :
| |
| Radio loads Distribution Panel XEC2-7 is normally L powered from XEC2 Circuit 3. In order to assure l availability of power to radio loads in case of loss of XEC2, an automatic transfer switch is provided to transfer power from the normal source to XEC1 Circuit 27 (alternate source) per approved design change. i Group: 2 1 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15A See Sheet No(s):02 i
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revised breaker size for 1EC3-1 and IEC4-1 Position 7. l Justification:
| |
| Revises breaker size for 120-VAC Panel IEC3-1 Position 7 from 20A to 15A and breaker size for 120-VAC Panel 1EC4-1 Position 7 from 20A to 15A to reflect approved design changes. Revision assures proper circuit protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| | |
| y
| |
| /
| |
| | |
| ==Attachment:==
| |
| t'o TXX-89201.
| |
| May 1, 1989-
| |
| .Page.180 of 439 FSAR Page-
| |
| -(asamended)- Description Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15A See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)-
| |
| Revised load equipment tag numbers to identify individual Diesel Generator equipment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| At Panelboard IEC4-1 Positions 1 and 2, the load equipment tag numbers are revised to uniquely identify
| |
| _ individual equipment (air dryers) on Diesel Generator Set IEG2.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15A See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| -Description: (Revision)
| |
| Panelboards XECl-1 Position 9 and XEC2-1 Position 9 .
| |
| are made " spare".
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Panelboards XEC1-1 Position 9 and XEC2-1 Position 9 are determinate and made " spare"'to separate Class-1E Unit 1 and Common circuits from Unit 2 until Unit 2 design, installation and testing is complete.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15A See Shed No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Panelboard XECl-1 Positions 10 and 12 and Panelboard XEC2-1 Positions 10 and 12 are made " spare".
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Panelboard XEC1-1 Positions 10 and 12 and Panelboard XEC2-1 Positions 10 and 12 are determinate and made
| |
| " spare" to separate Class 1E' Unit 1 and Common circuits from Unit 2 until Unit 2 design, installation and testing is complete.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No l: Figure 8.3-15A See Sheet No(s):02 1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) l~ Separatien of Class 1E MCCs & distribution panels
| |
| : l. common to both units.
| |
| i Justification:
| |
| The auto transfer switch is aligned to power its associated panel from the Unit 1 power source and
| |
| , associated wires are disconnected / rewired to support l the alignment of common Class 1E distribution panels to
| |
| | |
| .Att'achment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989
| |
| - Page 181 of 439
| |
| 'FSAR Page
| |
| -(as amended) Description Unit 1 only until the design, installation, and testing for Unit'2 is complete. New' notes (12) and (13) were added to provide additional explanation.-
| |
| regarding the design change.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER'Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No e
| |
| Figure 8.3-15A See Sheet No(s):02 ,
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resizes breakers in Panels XECl-1 and XEC2-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resizes~ breakers from-20A to 15A for Circuits 9,-10 and 11 in Panels XECl-1 and XEC2-1, per approved design.
| |
| Revision assures proper circuit protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15A See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Determinate cables in Panels 1EC3-2 and IEC4-2 and relabels the cables as " spare".
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Determinate cables at Circuit 8 in Panels 1EC3-2 and 1EC4-2 and relabels the cable as " spare", per approved design change.
| |
| Group:_3 Related.SER Section: 8.3.1 l
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15A See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Determinate cables in Panels XEC1-1 and XEC2-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Determinate cables at Circuits 10 and 12 in Panels XECl-1 and XEC2-1, and determinate Unit 2 feeds to i transfer switches for panels XECl-1 and XEC2-1. These changes provide separation of Unit 2 loads from Unit 1 circuits until Unit 2 design, installation and' testing _
| |
| is complete.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15B See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds Train A Control Room Radiation Monitoring System Air Monitors to Panelboard 1EC5.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds Train A Control Room Radiation Monitoring System l
| |
| o__ __ _ _ _ _ _ _
| |
| | |
| i Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 182 of 439 FSAR Page (as caended) Description Air Monitors to Position 7 and 12 of Panelboard IEC5.
| |
| X-RE-5895A is existing monitor upgraded to Class 1E.
| |
| X-RE-5896A is new monitor and sample pump. (Also see Fig. 8.3-11 (Sh. 2 and 3)). This provides redundancy and separation for Control Room intake radiation monitors.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15B See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resized breaker in Distribution Panel 1E03-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resized breaker in Distribution Panel 1ED3-1 Position 5 from 20A to 15A per validated design calculation and approved design change. Revision assures proper protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-158 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resized breaker in Distribution Panelboard IEC5.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resized breaker in Distribution Panelboard 1EC5 Position 8 from 20A to 15A per approved design change to provide proper electric penetration assembly / feeder cable protection.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3-15B See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds existing junction boxes to figure.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds existing junction boxes JB1A/42790 and JB1A/42890 to the figure per approved design.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15B See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resizes breaker in Panel 1EC5.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resizes breaker from 15A to 20A for Circuit 4 in Panel 1EC5 per approved design change.
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| | |
| I l
| |
| l Attachment to TXX-89201 Play 1,1989 Page 183 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Related SER Section: 8.3.1 !
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No j Figure 8.3-15B See Sheet No(s):01, 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| RPS Inverters IV1PC3 & IVIPC4 reassigned to IED3 & 1ED4 Justification:
| |
| RPS Inverters IV1PC3 & IV1PC4 have been reassigned to DC buses IED3 & IED4, respectively. The DC Bus reassignment is required to reduce the load on the battery chargers because the Class 1E chargers have been derated to 225 amps by the vendor.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER indicates that each Class 1E 125-V DC battery system consists of one battery /two chargers. The current CPSES Class IE design utilizes two trains of two batteries with 2 chargers per battery.
| |
| Figure 8.3-191 See Sheet No(s):01, 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Changed trip setting on 125-VDC Switchboards 1ED3 and 1ED4 Compartment 2-11.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 125-VDC Switchboards 1ED3 and 1ED4 Compartment 2-11 instantaneous trip setting is set at 900A for proper coordination with new load (IV1PC3 and IVIPC4, respectively). (See FSAR Change Request No. 88-949.6).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section 8.3.2 indicates that each Class lE 125-VDC system consists of 1 battery and 2 chargers. Current CPSES design utilizes 2 batteries with 2 chargers per battery for each train. Each of the four RPS Inverters is now powered off a separate 125-VDC bus.
| |
| Figure 8.3-15B See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resized breaker in Distribution Panelboard 1EC6.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resized breaker in Distribution Panelboard 1EC6 Position 8 from 20A to 15A per approved design change to provide proper electric penetration assembly / feeder cable protection.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to.TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 184 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Figure 8.3-15B See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds Train B Control Room Radiation Monitoring System Air Monitors to Panelboard IEC6.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds Train B Control Room Radiation Monitoring System Air Monitors to Positions 7 and 12 of Panelboard IEC6.
| |
| X-RE-58968 is existing monitor upgraded to Class 1E.
| |
| X-RE-5895B is new monitor and sample pump. (Also see Fig. 8.3-11 (Sh. 2 and 3)). This provides redundancy and separation for Control Room intake radiation monitors.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-158 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Resized breaker in Distribution Panel 1ED4-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Resized breaker in Distribution Panel 1E04-1 Position 5 from 20A to 15A per validated design calculation and approved design change. Revision assures proper protection and proper coordination of protection devices.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15C
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Updates and adds new load to Distribution Panel 1D3-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Distribution Panel 103-1 is updated to reflect current validated design. A description is added for the panel Cable numbers are provided. New load DC Control Power for Station Service Transformer IST (Amendment 66) is added to Position 3.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 8.A-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial) ;
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Editorial clarification changing "shall mean to l include" to "shall include".
| |
| ! Group: 4 l SER/SSER Impact: No l
| |
| 1
| |
| | |
| Attachment > to TXX-89201
| |
| -May11, 1989 Page 185 ofu439 FSAR Page
| |
| -(as amended) Description 8.A-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects description-of applicability of analysis in Appendix 8A of FSAR for cable splices outside of-sraceways.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Appendix 8A was written specifically for cable splices located in raceways at CPSES. The analysis satisfies-the requirements' of- NRC Regulatory Guide 1.75, Revision 1, Regulatory Position 'C.9. The attributes described.
| |
| also. apply to other cable splices performed at CPSES, but apply as described.in total only to the Class 1E cable splices performed at CPSES. For example, Non-Class 1E cable. splices outside of raceways may use other materials, components or manufacturers. This-change was previously submitted as an advance FSAR' change by TV Electric letter logged TXX-89029, dated January 23, 1989.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes This subject has not yet been addressed in the SER, however the current SER review of this area for section 8.4.4 is impacted.
| |
| 8.A
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects designation of sealant / adhesive for Raychem splice kits.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| An apparent typographical error in original analysis -
| |
| listed the sealant / adhesive for Raychem splice kits'as S119 when it should be S1119. S1119 has passed the IEEE Standard 383 flame test with WCSF. This change was previously submitted as an advance FSAR change by TV Electric letter logged TXX-89029, dated January 23, 1989 Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes This subject has not yet been addressed in the SER, however the current SER review of this area for section 8.4.4 is impacted.
| |
| 8.A-5, 9 See Page No(s):11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds Pre-Insulated Environmental Splices (PIES) to Appendix 8A, " Analysis to Justify Cable Splices in Raceways."
| |
| Justification:
| |
| PIES are also used in raceways in mild environment areas. The Kynar insulation material is already described and evaluated in the analysis. The connectors meet the same requirements described for the
| |
| | |
| !' ? Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| .May.1, 1989
| |
| .Page 186 of 439 i
| |
| ,e FSAR Page l (as amended) Description AMP PIDG connectors. As an editorial correction, PIDG.
| |
| is now correctly spelled.on page 8A-5. This change was
| |
| , 'previously submitted as an advance FSAR change by TV Electric letter logged TXX-89029, dated January'23, 1989.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 8.4.4
| |
| -SER/SSER Impact: Yes This' subject has not yet been addressed in the SER, however the current SER review of this area for section 8.4.4 is~ impacted.
| |
| 9.1-15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) .
| |
| Adds 'GDC 3' to the list of 10 CFR Part 50,-Appendix-A, GDC with which the spent. fuel pool cooling and cleanup-system complies.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Re-evaluation of system design criteria determined.that the spent fuel. pool. cooling and cleanup system is in compliance with GDC 3. This is consistent with the system design criteria which requires GDC 3 for establishing system design bases.
| |
| , Group:.3 Related SER Section:.9.1.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.1-16, 17 See Page No(s):2S and 28
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Reflects the latest values for decay heat produced,.
| |
| spent fuel pool water temperature, and temperature rise time based on the revised calculation. Also revises the level and radiation instrumentation description.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| As a result of.the revised calculation, the decay, heat values are lower, but the spent fuel pool water temperatures are higher. This is based on increased CCW temperature. The calculation also predicts the time for the temperature to rise to 212 F, instead of 180 F. The level and radiation instrumentation description is revised to reflect design criteria.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.1.3 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER 9.1.3 (p. 9-5) conflicts with F';AR 9.1.3.1.1 No. 2 (p. 9.1-16) in that the SER states pool water temp can be maintained at 137F with max design heat load and re-sulting max heat load temp is below max acceptable temp of 140F. Assumptions re: conditions behind temps differ.
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 ,
| |
| Page 187 of 439 FSAR Page I
| |
| q (as amended) Description l 9.1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletes 'GDC 63' from the fuel handling system design i bases.
| |
| l Justification:
| |
| Conformance to GDC 63, " Monitoring Fuel and Waste Storage," is not required for the fuel handling system as stated in Standard Review Plan Section 9.1.4.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.1.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 9.1-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds a note referencing BTP ASB 9-2, and provides units-for decay heat produced. This change request resulted from discussion with the NRC and action item from TXX-88855.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Branch Technical Position (BTP) ASB 9-2 was the basis for the calculated decay heat produced in the spent fuel pools (per SER 9.1.3). The units for decay heat produced were inadvertently omitted from a previous FSAR revision.
| |
| Group: 2 Related.SER Section: 9.1.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 9.1-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Reflects the latest values for decay heat produced, spent fuel pool water temperature, and temperature rise time based on the revised calculation. Also revises the level and radiation instrumentation description.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| As a result of the revised calculation, the decay heat values are lower, but the spent fuel pool water temperatures are higher. This is based on increased CCW temperature. The calculation also found the temperature rise time to be 212 F instead of 180 F.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.1.3 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER 9.1.3 (p. 9-5) conflicts with FSAR Table 9.1-1 in that the SER states pool water temp can be maintained at 137 F with max design heat load and resulting max heat load temp is below max acceptable temp of 140 F.
| |
| FSAR change says temps are maintained at <142 F.
| |
| Table 9.1-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects technical data and design parameters for the spent fuel pool cooling and cleanup system components.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the design paraineters for the spent fuel pool
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Paae 188 of 439. )
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description cooling and cleanup system components based on the re- j vised calculation and minor editorial changes.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.1.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.1-13 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes to match as-built plant.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changed line numbers and piping and added and alternate !
| |
| switch location to start spent fuel pump.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.1-13 See Sheet No(s):01,02, and 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrected valve and piping configurations, tag numbers, deleted flanges and added valve extensions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Identified valve position and class breaks, corrected piping configurations, line numbers and tag numbers, deleted flanges and added valve extensions to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.1-13 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds thermal relief valve to spent fuel pool demineralized.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Valve was added to meet proper overpressure protection i requirements of ASME III for isolable water solid components.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.1.3 SER/SSER Irnpact: No 9.2- 4, 40 See Page No(s):41 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Removes reference to gas chlorination system and re-places it with a sodium hypochlorite and sodium bromide addition system for the circulating and service water systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Reference to the gas chlorination system is replaced.
| |
| The name of the chlorine storage building was changed to the chemical storage building.
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| | |
| Attachment < to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 189 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Related SER Section: 9.2.1&4 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes In SER 9.2.4, it states that "The nonsafety-related potable and sanitary water system provides... water to supply circulating water chlorine evaporators."
| |
| 9.2-2, 3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the number of sheets associated with Figure 9.2-1.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.2-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises FSAR Section 9.2 to provide a more conservative fouling factor for the CCW heat exchangers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| A more conservative fouling factor was chosen to upgrade heat transfer capabilities.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.2-5 See Page No(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds valve and line to 4-inch discharge line from de-mineralized water storage tank to supply polymer f eed tank, and corrects valve tag number.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| (1) Adds valve and line to 4-inch discharge line from demineralized water storage tank to supply polymer feed tank to reflect information provided on a flow diagram.
| |
| A Design Change changed the water supply from potable water to demineralized water for supply to polymer feed tank.
| |
| (2) The tag number was found to be incorrect as a re-sult of a previous drafting error.
| |
| (3) Incorporates previously approved minor technical changes.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2 SER/SSER impact: No 9.2-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises SSW and CCW compliance with GDC 5. Specifi-cally, it makes clear that single locked valves separate units, instead of redundant locked valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises SSW and CCW compliance with GDC 5, as a result of a misinterpretation contained within the SER. ,
| |
| | |
| , y f-F h' . Attachments to TXX-89201'
| |
| .Mayl1,21989.
| |
| : j. ~ Page-190'of 439-FSAR.Page (as amended). - Description Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER 9.2.1 states: " Cross-connections between units are-isolated by two locked valves in series." It should .
| |
| state: "The cross-connection between units is isolated- !
| |
| by one locked valve." l 9.2-91
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) >
| |
| Revises Station Service Water System testing. l Justification: !
| |
| L Revises'the Station Service Water (SSW) System testing requirements by removing the requirement to test the !
| |
| !' .SSW pumps in~the recirculation mode. Pump testing can- '!
| |
| still be conducted without the recirculation line (by - !
| |
| starting the pump.from the standby mode) as long as the l availability of the rest of the SSW train is assured. 1 Group: 3 i Related SER Section: 9.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes 1 SER states that recirculation loops are provided for
| |
| . testing. This is inconsistent with this Change Request. -l 9.2-14r 18 See Page No(s):24 and 27
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification: !
| |
| Add description of an equalizing opening in the i partition of the Component Cooling Water System surge ;
| |
| tank. i Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER impact: No ;
| |
| i 9.2-18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) !
| |
| Justification: !
| |
| Clarification of an existing design feature regarding .
| |
| the isolation of Component Cooling Water System l Safeguard Loops on surge tank Empty Level signal. '
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 3 SER/SSER Impact: No l l
| |
| 9.2-19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) i Update the CCW system drains description Justification:
| |
| Corrects the system description for the following CCW system drrins to reflect the as-built configuration:
| |
| 1)The drains do not return the CCW system to preclude corrosion contamination. 2) Drains from some of the thermal relief valves for CCW system are not routed to the safeguard building drain truck; some of them are
| |
| | |
| E Attachment
| |
| * to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 191 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description routed to the floor drain.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 &8 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 9.2-23
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects information re: minimum available NPSH for CCW pumps and removes the inconsistency between an FSAR table and text.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects discrepancy between Table 9.2-2 and Section 9.2.2.2 re: minimum available NPSH -for CCW pumps, based on the revised calculation.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 9.2-25, 32
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revisic ,
| |
| Modifies existing instrumentation to automatically close Component Cooling Water containment isolation valves upon sensing Reactor Coolant Pump thermal barrier tube rupture.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Existing Class 1E Reactor Coolant Pump thermal barrier CCW outlet flow and temperature instrumentation modifications provide redundant signal for automatic closure of CCW Containment isolation valves.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes Third paragraph on Page 9-11, last sentence implies that operator will take mant.a1 action for isolation upon indication in the control room. This FCR changes manual operator action to automatic isolation of CCW isolation valves.
| |
| 9.2-26
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises SSW and CCW compliance with GDC 5. Speci fi-cally, it makes clear that single locked valves I- separate units, instead of redundant locked valves.
| |
| { Justification:
| |
| : j. Revises SSW and CCW compliance with GDC 5, as a result of a misinterpretation contained within the SER.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes
| |
| : l. SER 9.2.2 states: "The interconnection between Unit 1 safeguards loops and Unit 2...are blocked by redundant locked-closed isolation valves." It should state:
| |
| ...are blocked by at least one locked-closed isolation valve."
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TxX-8'3201 May 1, 1989
| |
| .Page 192 ef 439 FSAR Page (as aniended) Description 9.2-26
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises $5W and CCW compliance with G0C 5. Specifi-cally, it makes clear that single locked valves separate units, instead of redundant locked valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises SSW and CCW compliance with GDC 5, as a result of a misinterpretation contained within the SER. CCW for CR-HVAC and UPS-HVAC may be provided by either unit.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes Also, it is suggested that the following sentence be deleted in SER 9.2.2: "There is no sharing of any i safeguards components or safeguards function between i the two units," as it is not reflective of the actual l relationship between the two units.
| |
| 9.2-36, 39 See Page No(s):40
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the instrumentation applicatica. operations, chemical requirements and design requirunents of de-mineralized and reactor makeup water system. '
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the following based on Westinghouse chemistry specification and revised system design:
| |
| (1) There is no mixed bed effluent flow controller associated with the DWST.
| |
| (2) To avoid confusion concerning the amount of water "in reserve", the stated volume of the DWST should be removed.
| |
| (3) There are no requirements for continuously monitor-ing silica, and therefore it is to be removed.
| |
| (4) Pumps to the ion exchangers are 50% capacity pumps with no " spare pumps" available.
| |
| (5) Regeneration for ion exchanger beds may proceed either automatically or manually.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.2-40, 41 See Page No(s):42 and 43 ,
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) '
| |
| Corrections tu text reflect as-built configuration of potable and sanitary water system.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes well water as supply source for water treatment Adds supply for emergency showers in aux boiler bldg &
| |
| chem storage bldg and supply for fire water storage and domestic water storage tanks and various HVAC units Clarifies the fact that water wells do not supply water L___ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
| |
| | |
| (
| |
| -Attachment to TXX-89201 L. .May 1,'1989- .
| |
| M ;Page 193'of 439L
| |
| . .FSAR Page.
| |
| Asamended) Description to the water treatment' system and that sewage sludge
| |
| -is not required-to be disposed of off site. Also clarifies tests and inspection methods' for potable water system. Deletes the word " safety" as' requested by the NRC.
| |
| Group: 3.
| |
| L Related SER Section: 9.2.4-L SER/SSER Impact: No 9.2-49, 50
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)-
| |
| Revises component cooling water peak-temperature in the DBA unit with-station service water at 102F.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The component cooling water temperature has increased due to increased heat loads identified during the validation effort. The temperature as increased matches the design basis i.emperature.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.2.185 SER/SSER impact: No Table 9.2-1 Descrip. tion: (Correction) .
| |
| Corrects the FMEA table for SSWS to-reflect as-built.
| |
| condition and incorporates FMEA for additional compon-ents to complete the' table.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for the Station Service Water System to reflect the additions to the FMEA of the SSW pump recirculation valve, emergency diesel generator isolation valve, and auxiliary feedwater isclation valve. Makes minor editorial changes.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 9.2-5 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Correct comments to reflect valve status upon loss of power.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 3.9.3.2; SSER1 3.9.6 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 9.2-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Updates demineralized water chemistry analysis limits.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the limits for specific conductivity, soluble silica and suspended solids. The limits are decreased based on Westinghouse revised chemistry specification.
| |
| Sodium limits are deleted.
| |
| _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - - - _ _ n
| |
| | |
| V '
| |
| $1 . Attachment to.TXX-89201' i May 1, 1989- '{
| |
| Page'194 of 439 FSAR Page- .
| |
| . Description (as amended)
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 9.2-10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes the . reactor makeup water chemistry specifica-tions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes reactor makeup water chemistry specifications to be consistent with proposed Tech Specs and NSSS vendor specification.
| |
| Group: 3' Related SER Section: 9.2.3 '
| |
| SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.2-1, 3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect as-built conditions of CCWS and SSWS.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes.to reflect as-built conditions, such as removal of certain caps; addition of flexible hose, drain valves, certain caps, nozzle connections, line numbers, thermal relief valves, vent',
| |
| valve numbers; removal of symbol'and notes; modification of line designations and maximum size of -
| |
| chlorine containers.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2.182 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-1 See Sheet Wo(s):01 Description.: .(Revision)
| |
| Deletes Station Service Water System recirculation line control valves, associated piping, and orifices.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The Station Service Water System recirculation line control valves (PV-4252 & PV-4253), associated piping (10-SW-1-027-150-3 & 10-SW-1-037-150-3), and orifices are being removed and blind flanges added. Mini-flow recirculation is not normdlly provided for once-thru systems and is not required for the Station Service Water System to perform its intended design function.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.2.1 SER/SSER Impact Yes SER states that recirculation loops are provided around the SSW pumps for testing. Pumptestingcan still be performed without the recirculation lines.
| |
| This is consistent with FSAR Change Request 89-414.4.
| |
| ~
| |
| | |
| ,: - : Attachment...to'TXX-89201 May .1,11989
| |
| :Page 195 of 439
| |
| 'FSAR Page
| |
| .(as amended) ' Description Figure 9.2-1,.3 See. Sheet.No(s):01 (Sht. 02) and 03 (Sht. 07)
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Reflects upgrade of pipe schedule of carbon ste'el section of drain. lines; adds drain lines; shows flanges
| |
| 'for check ~ valves on CCW containment. drain tank; and, shows' newly added drain valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Flanges.shown reflect'as-built condition. Drain valves.
| |
| added to facilitate draining of CCW containment drain tank. (88-850)
| |
| Drain lines added to reflect as-built condition.
| |
| Schedule upgraded as a result of additional drains
| |
| . necessary for adequate ' drainage. (88-590)
| |
| Group:.3 Related SER Section: 9.2.1&2
| |
| ~SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)-
| |
| Removes reference to gas chlorination system and re-places it with a sodium hypochlorite and sodium' bromide addition system for the circulating and service water systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The gas chlorine detectors are. removed from the control room air intakes, and reference to the gas' chlorination
| |
| . system is. replaced.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-1 SeeSheetNo(s):01,02,and03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| -Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect as-built conditions, such as the relocation of a temperature inuicator; the change of line numbers and pipe category; the addition of notes; the relocation of vacuum breakers; the display of a capped connection and pipe connections; and, the addition of a drain line and pipe class break.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2.1 ;
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01,02, and 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| e _ - _ _ _- _ -_-
| |
| | |
| 43 , 11 i Attachment , to TXX-89201' May If 1989-p" Page.196.of 439-FSAR Page
| |
| .~(as' amended)- . Description.
| |
| -Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built
| |
| . conditions including the following:
| |
| : 1) Change line numbers and sizes to reflect as-built conditions,'
| |
| : 2) Adds vents, drains to prevent corrosion; access manways to. remove plasite; pipe designations.; relief valve to prevent system overpressurization;.
| |
| classification breaks; and pipe capped connections,.
| |
| : 3) Deletes chlorine residual analyzers and associated equipment (analysis will be performed manually),
| |
| : 4) Relocate temperature indicator' based on ease of use,
| |
| : 5) Install vacuum breakers to prevent water hammer-in the system to avoid possible piping and pipe support damage, and .. _
| |
| '6) Corrects shield wall penetrations to reflect the as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.2.1 P SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction).
| |
| Deletes SSW chlorine residual analyzer and. sample pump.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the SSWS drawing to delete the chlorine residual analyzer which is not required by the NPDES Permit; however,. chlorine discharge ~will be monitored by: analyzing the grab samples.
| |
| Group: 3 ,
| |
| Related SER Section: 9.2.1 i SER/SSER 1mpact: No l
| |
| Figure 9.2-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds manways for access into SSWS piping to remove Plasite liner in 30-inch lines.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds manways for access into SSWS piping to remove 30" internal piping Plasite liner. Reflects as-built condition.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No I
| |
| Figure 9.2-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds'24 inch access manways to give access for removing pipe coatings.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No L
| |
| = = _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ -_
| |
| : p. - .
| |
| o- ,
| |
| -E ~ TAttachment~ 'to . TXX-89201.-
| |
| l 'May 1,J1989 L Page 197 of 439 R-
| |
| 'FSAR Page
| |
| '(as amended) . Description Figure 9.2-3 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| '(Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built conditions, Justification: .
| |
| 1 Miscellaneous minor technical changes such as remove the vent valve, add line designation, identify valves
| |
| , position ' LIP' and~'LC' valves. .
| |
| Group: 3.
| |
| Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-3 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises the figure'to add ' lock close ' to valve ICC-1015 for. seismic class break.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER.Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-3 See' Sheet No(s):01 thru 08
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| . Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect as-built conditions for CCWS.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor chanpas to reflect'as-built conditions for CCWS, such as changes in drain and vent lines, valves & connecticas; deletion'of radiation shield walls; addition of a line, equipment, valve tag numbers; addition of flow limiting device to valve; change in equipment orientation; addition of notes; and, identification of ' locked in' valves in CCWS.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-3 See Sheet No(s):01,04, and 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects and revises.the valve tag numbers for the component cooling water system. Removes the air operators and provides locked open manual valve for the supply and return lines to instrument' air compressors in the event of inadvertent closure of the air operated valves. j Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| * / Attachment- Lto TXX-89201
| |
| , .May 1, 1989, Page 198 of'439:
| |
| LFSAR'Page (as-amended) Description
| |
| . Figure 9.2 SeeSheetNo(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical. changes'to match as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built-conditions including delete pressure switch and adding
| |
| . class break, vent lines, valve and line. tag nos..
| |
| Identify valve position ' LIP'.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| .Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.2-3 See Sheet No(s):02 and 04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| -Justification:
| |
| . Relocates the barrier identification and instrument location to reflect the as-built design of the
| |
| . component cooling water system.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER impact: No
| |
| ' Figure 9.2-3 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correctior) , . ..
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built conditions including adding a pressure indicator, flex hose, drain and vent details.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-3 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Incorporates changes to correct the inability of the vent condenser. eductor to drain condensate during low flow operation and the inability of the design of the vent condenser to prevent air inleakage or pressure surges. Adds new line numbers on recycle evaporator.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes are necessary to correct the following problems: (1) the vent condenser eductor will not drain condensate during low flow operation, and (2) the "present" design of the vent condenser does not prevent air inleakage or pressure surges. (88-552)
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ___n_____E_______________________.._.__ __ _ !
| |
| | |
| r.
| |
| $ ' Attachment to-TXX-89201' ,
| |
| May.1, 1989 E -Page 199 of 439 1: \
| |
| , FSAR'Page 1 (asamended) Description
| |
| : Figure'9.2-3 See Sheet No(s):04 and 07
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor' technical changes to match as-built.
| |
| condtions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built' conditions including. correcting valve types, remove.
| |
| radiation shield walls, relocate drain valve, identify valve as ,'llP', add control valve, line. tag nos, and drain valves.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section:'9.2.2
| |
| , SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| .1 Figure 9.2-3 SeeSheetNo(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-bui.it conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built-conditions including adding valve tag nos., pressure indicators, correcting valve position, add thermal ~
| |
| relief valves, add line numbers', identify valves'as
| |
| ' LIP', adds valves, and identify valves as N.0.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| . Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-3 See Sheet No(s):05 ']
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justific0 tion:
| |
| Adds flanges and reducers te the componert cooling water system to reflect the as-built design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/3SER Impact: No Figure 9.2-3 See Sheet No(s):06
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built conditions including adding line nos., changing class from 3 to 5, and correcting valve tag nos., equipment tag nos., and positions as ' LIP'.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| | |
| dttachinent ? 'to TXX-89201
| |
| !May.1,D1989 ,
| |
| lPage 200 of 439 L FSAR Page
| |
| '(as amended) Description Figure 9.2-3. -See Sheet No(s):06 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification: .. .
| |
| Corrects the seal water coolers tag numbers:in Waste g . Gas Evaporator Packages.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| ~
| |
| .Related'SER.Section::9.2.'2-SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-3 See Sheet No(s):07
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)'
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects'the line number to 3/4-CC-1-991-152-2 for the
| |
| -inlet line to relief valve 10C-1067.
| |
| Group: '3 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ' Figure.9.2-3 See Sheet No(s):08
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built
| |
| . conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes such as identification of valves as locked in position (LIP) valves.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.2-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the tag number for the air operated valve for the water treatment system, which is consistent with j the as-built design.
| |
| l Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2 ;
| |
| SER/SSER-Impact: Nc, Figure 9.2-4 SeeSheet.No(s):01and02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditinns including adding continuation block information and cross reference note for flow diagrams.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| m Attachment to TXX-89'201 May:1,-1989 Page 201 of 439 1
| |
| FSAR Page
| |
| '(as amended); Description.
| |
| F.igure 9.2-4A
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| ' Revises information to reflect the replacement of the; existing surface water pre-treatment system with new equipment with higher capacity and greater reliability.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| New equipment is being' installed and will replace the existing surface water pre-treatment system. The new-equipment has.a higher capacity & greater reliability.
| |
| Existing equipment will remain in service until the
| |
| , new equipment is operational.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2 SER/SSER Impact: No.
| |
| ' Figure 9.2-4A'
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the tag number.for the restriction orifice for:
| |
| the water system, which is consistent with the as-built design.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2 SER/SSER'Ippact: No Figure 9.2-4A SeeSheet.No(s):01thru06
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction).
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions including adding continuation hicck information and cross reference note for flow diagrams.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-3 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions including addition of valves and line nos., and changed the water supply to the polymer feed tank from potable water to demineralized water.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| a y .
| |
| , Attachment to TXX-89201- :
| |
| :May 1,' 1989. ,
| |
| , Page. 202 of'439:
| |
| FSAR Page (asamended) Description
| |
| . Figure 9.2-5 See Sheet No(s):01,02,04,05, and 06
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)'
| |
| s Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect as-bull.t' conditions for Demineralized and Reactor Mak'e-'up Water:
| |
| System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| . Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect the as-built-conditions for Demineralized and Reactor Make-up Water System, such as the addi. tion of a new'line, valve,
| |
| -equipment,-and tag numbers; change in orientation of piping, equipment and system class breaks; and the addition of drain valves and sensing line valves.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-5 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) g Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions for the Demineralized'and Reactor Make-Up Water System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes reflect as-built conditions including addition of -piping for instrument root conection.
| |
| ~
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-5 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor corrections show line numbers, weld classes, and anti-siphoning connections.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes reflect as-built conditions and bring drawings into agreement.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-S See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to refiect -
| |
| as-built conditions. '
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect l.,: as-built conditions including revising drawing symbols, .
| |
| piping configuration, and adding line breaks and j sample valves. Adds full flow vent to RWST to prevent overpressurization of the Reactor Water Storage Tank in the event of inadvertent opening of the manual isolation valve.
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| : v. s: .
| |
| [
| |
| ;w
| |
| | |
| " Attachment- -to TXX-89201.
| |
| -May 1, 1989.
| |
| Page-203 of.439 7
| |
| FSAR Page f
| |
| (as amended). Description Related SER Section: 9.2.3
| |
| , SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Added valve symbol upstream of check valve and change.
| |
| 'line number.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change reflects.as-built conditions.
| |
| . Group: 3~
| |
| Related SER Section: 9.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-5 .See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| ' Adds check valve and pressure relief valve to demineralized system to prevent the.overpressurization.
| |
| Group: 3 ,
| |
| Related SER Section: 9.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Addition)
| |
| Adds potable water system connections to on-site chem storage guilding, telecommunication center, and new aux bciler building.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| : 1) Adds )otable water at.on-site chem storage bldg for emerg slower & eye wash per OSHA Std 1910.151-(88-659)
| |
| : 2) Adds potable water at communication center HVAC units to meet humidity requirements of PBX Switch 88-726.
| |
| ~3) Adds potable water supply to new aux boiler bldg for i personnel and maintenance purposes, emergency showers, '!
| |
| and eye wesh stations.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section; 9.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ? Figure 9.2-6 Description,: (Editorial) j 1 Miscellaneous editorial changes to reflect as-built conditions of potable water system.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| I .. Change te reflect permanent branch connection to l existing buried 4" potable water line.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| ( .' , ' Attachment to'TXX-89201
| |
| .May 1, 1989 Page.204~of'439 .l 1
| |
| FSAR Page (as' amended) ~ Description-Figure 9.2-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) y Adds connections to supply potable. water, service air,L and instrument air to the water retreatment equipment, which was added.
| |
| ' Justification:
| |
| The water retreatment system is being modified to improve production and reliability. . Connections are required to provide potable. water, service air'and instrument air to the area. Deletes the word ' safety' from hose reel.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrections reflect as-built conditions of Potable and Sanitary Water System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Shows configuration of supply to Fire ProtectionLSys.&
| |
| added supply to.telecon center, clarifier chemical feed building, aux boiler building and chemical storage b1dg Deletes the word " safety" as requested by the NRC.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-7=
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects flow diagram to reflect current piping arrangement; deletes drawing references.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the piping arrangements from the guard house to manhole #2A, from alternate access point to sewage treatment plant, from Warehouse B and Warehouse B Annex to sewage plant, and from contract services building to sewage plant. Changes the line number and makes minor changes to reflect as-built condition.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2.4 SER/SSE.R impact: No Figure 9.2-15, 16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| See Sheet Nos: -15 Sheets 1-2, -16 Sheets 1-2 Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions including flow diagram references and indicators.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2 i SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| - _ _ - _ - . _ . - - _ _ - - . - - -- _ - - _ _ _ . . -_ l
| |
| | |
| ' Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989.
| |
| :Page 205 of 439 l l FSAR Page
| |
| '(as amended) ' Description i
| |
| Figure.9.2 '15 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Relocates' intersection and sample line of waste water management system to reflect as-built piping.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Relocates intersection and sample line of waste water management system to reflect as-built piping.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-16 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds compartments for storage of metal cleaning waste-water in existing evaporation pond, and adds an equalization line and valve.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Portions of evaporation pond are to be compartment-alized and relined to meet regulatory requirements for retention of metal-cleaning wastewater. Equalization line and valve are to be added to allow selective mixing between compartments.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.2.7-54,55 See Page No(s):56, 57
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises information to reflect the replacement of.the existing surface water pre-treatment system with new equipment with higher capacity and greater _ reliability.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| New equipment is being instailed and will replace the existing surface water pre-treatment system. The new equipment has a higher capacity & greater reliability.
| |
| Existing equipment will remain in service until the new equipment is operational.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.2.7-58,59
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Revises information to reflect the replacement of the existing surface water pre-treatment system with new equipment with higher capacity and greater reliability.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| New equipment is being installed and will replace the existing surface water pre-treatment system. The new equipment has a higher capacity & greater reliability.
| |
| Existing equipment will remain in service until the new equipment is operational.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| | |
| l l- Attachment to TXX-89201 May.1, 1989 Page 206 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Related SER Section: 9.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.3-8, 10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds auxiliary feedwater motor-driven pumps recircula-tion valves to the description of valves supplied with air accumulators and deletes reference to turbine-driven pump recirculation valve which is not air-operated.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change is proposed to update the FSAR text to reflect plant design, as shown on FSAR Figure 9.3-3 (Sheet 3).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.3-9, 10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Four-inch service air line is removed to prevent use of service air as a backup (supplement) to instrument air capacity.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The service air line is removed as the service air i system is no longer needed as a backup air supply for the instrument air system. The Design Engineering Package states that the instrument air system will have adequate capacity to meet system demand upon the implementation of the applicable design modification.
| |
| The Design Engineering Package further states that because of past problems with unwanted oil and water contaminating the instrument air system quality and purity whenever this line is utilized, the line should be removed upon the implementation of the design modification.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.3-14, 15 See Page No(s):19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises Process Sampling System system description, chemistry requirements and parameters based on recent design modifications, Justification:
| |
| Revises the following chemistry requirements for the Process Sampling System based on Westinghouse chemistry specification guidelines.
| |
| Flow values have been changed and it is noted that 3/8-inch tubing is used instead of small bore piping for the pass-through of reactor coolant loop samples. The flow values have been changed as a result of the modi-fication of the flow regulators to increase flow to en-
| |
| | |
| 4 Attachment .to TXX-89201' .
| |
| .May.1, 1989 Page 207 of 439 I
| |
| FSAR Page (asamended) Description sure that the sample can be routed to the Volume Con-trol Tank. Tubing is used in place of pipe per the Westinghouse requirement of a flow of 4 ft/sec.through the sample tubing to keep the boron from precipitating out of solution for reactor coolant; this criteria has -
| |
| been applied to all process sample: lines-containing boron.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.3.2 L SER/SSER Impact: No.
| |
| - 9.3-16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) . .
| |
| Deletes specifics re: manual liquid sampling methodo-logy, including sample bottle rinsing.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Current CPSES procedures provide adequate sample bottl'e rinsing and adequate purge. times for sample lines.
| |
| : l. Procedures that require rinsing require that containers.
| |
| shall be triple-rinsed with sample water; some sampling procedures do not allow the rinsing, or overflowing,.of "
| |
| sample containers to make allowance for the use of pre-treated, preserved sample containers.
| |
| ,o Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: ho I
| |
| 9.3-17
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Changes flow rates of sample line purging to a
| |
| ' recommended' rate, and deletes minimum sample volume.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To require that sample flow be at least 500 ml/ min is not always appropriate. Sample activity and analytical method will dictate the appropriate sample flow rate.
| |
| In addition, sample volues of 150 ml are not always applicable, because of ALARA and the analytical method being used. Currently, a procedure requires that the recirculation flow rate be 15 gph to ensure representative sampiing.
| |
| Grcup: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.3-20
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correccion)
| |
| Deletes reference to specific conductivity meters and pH meters on the fuel pool purification system.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes specific conductivity meters from the fuel pool purification system based on the requirements of West-inghouse chemistry specification and guidelines. The pH meters do not exist on this system; however, pH measurements as required by Westinghouse chemistry specification and guidelines will be made by manual
| |
| | |
| ( , ,
| |
| }
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| .May 1,.1989:
| |
| p cPage:208 of-439.
| |
| ESAR Page
| |
| :(as amended)L Description I grab sample analysis. These changes are required'to reflect the CPSES as-built' conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 h
| |
| Related SER Section: 9.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.3-23,._24 _See Page No(s):26 and 27
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects system description and instrumentation requirements for equipment and floor drainage system to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The.following changes were made to the system description for the equipment and floor drainage system to reflect as-built. conditions:
| |
| (1) List of figures were updated to show those that were equipment and floor drain system flow diagrams.
| |
| (2) The statement re: Safeguards Building floor drains,
| |
| ~
| |
| ~" Drainage of floors a'oove 785 ft. 6 in. is routed directly to the floor drain tank." is incorrect'and should be changed to read, " Drains from areas-'above 785-ft. 6 in. are routed directly to the floor drain tank-or to one of the sumps."
| |
| (3) The following sentence in the Safeguards Building floor drains section, "The drains from the safeguard compartments are aligned for normal discharge into these sumps," is redundant to other information in the section and is being deleted.
| |
| (4) Sump No. 2 for the Auxiliary Building-floor drains does not discharge to the laundry and hot shower tcnk; therefore, the sentence within subsection 9.3.3.2.3, which indicates that it does, is being deleted .
| |
| (5) Sump No. 2 for the Auxiliary Building floor drains is being added to the listing re: Sump Nos. 1, 7 and 12 as a rollection point of the remainder of the drainage from the lowest part of the northern half of the a Auxiliary Building, to reflect an as-built condition.
| |
| (6) Information re: Fuel Building Sump No. 2 has been i corrected to reflect an as-built condition. Sump No. 2 gets drainage from several areas in addition to drum storage currently indicated.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.3-26
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Reroute of hot shop (room 39) drains to Unit 1 Sump #8.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| After Unit I startup, hot shop. drains must be kept in Unit I controlled areas and systems so that radwaste contamination is not spread.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| | |
| HAttachment to TXX-89201 May;1, 1989 Pege.209 of.439-FSAR.Page;
| |
| ; Jasamended). Description Related.SER Section: 9.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ' 9. 3_-30;
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects system description and instrumentation
| |
| . requirements for equipment and floor drainage system to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| A change was made to the instrumentation requirements for the equipment and floor drainage system to reflect as-built conditions. Specifically, it indicates that the-Auxiliary Building and diesel generator floor drain sumps have a high-water alarm, which alerts the Control.
| |
| Room operator.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.3' SER/SSER Impact: No 9.3-40
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises value for equilibrium hydrogen concentration from 25 to 50 cc hydrogen for Reactor Coolant Purification and Chemistry Control System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The Chemistry Department has adopted Westinghouse and EPRI guidelines re: chemistry criteria and specifica-tions. These guidelines specify the operation of the RCS within 25 cc.to 50 cc hydrogen at STP per kilogram of water. This change' adjusts the value for equili-brium hydrogen concentration for consistency with EPRI.
| |
| and Westinghouse guidelines.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 9.3-3 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds auxiliary feedwater motor-driven pumps recircula-tion valves to the description of valves supplied with air accumulators and deletes reference to turbine-driven pump recirculation valve which is not air-(
| |
| operated.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change is proposed to update the FSAR text to reflect plant design, as shown on FSAR Figure 9.3-3 (Sheet 3).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 210 of 439
| |
| 'FSAR Page (as amended) Description Table 9.3-3 See Sheet No(s):01,02,04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Corrects failure mode analyses to reflect current design requirements for air-operated safety-related valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects failure mode analysis to reflect current design requirements for air-operated safety-related valves by:
| |
| (1) Deleting the MSSS isolation bypass valve. MSIV bypass valves are manual as a result of the removal of .
| |
| the pneumatic operators. This change is consistent with other changes made previously to other FSAR sections.
| |
| (2) Deleting CCWS surge tank vent valves. CCW tank vent valves have been removed.
| |
| (3) Deleting CCWS to instrument air compressor isola-tion valve. CCW to instrument air compressor valves are now manual valves.
| |
| (4) Revising the ' Remarks' for motor-driven AFS pumps recirculation valve to account for the provision of accumulators to permit automatic control for a 30-minute period and the use of manual valves to throttle or isolate recirculation flow locally. Motor-driven AFW pumps were provided accumulators as corrective action to an SDAR.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 9.3-3 See Sheet No(s):02,04,05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects failure mode and effects analysis for air-operated safety-related valves to reflect as built g conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| (1) Corre-ts the folkwing FMEA to reflect as-buiP conditions:
| |
| (a) The CCWS surge tank vent valves are deleted.
| |
| (b) The safety chiller condenser CCW regulating valves are added.
| |
| (c) Deletes CCWS to instrument air compressor isolation valve.
| |
| (2) Corrects failure mode for letdown HX outlet CCWS return control valve to fail open, not fail closed, as previously listed.
| |
| (3) Adds acronyms to the " Notes" of the table for consistency.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| i Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 211 of 439 FSAR Page Qsamended) Description Table 9.3-4 See Sheet No(s):01 and 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises Process Sampling System system description, chemistry requirements and parameters based on recent design modifications.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises the following chemistry requirements for the Process Sampling System based on Westinghouse chemistry specification guidelines.
| |
| Removes from the column entitled, " Parameter Measured",
| |
| the following items:
| |
| (1) SIS accumulators - pH (pH measurement)
| |
| (2) CVCS letdown inlet - 8, SC (boric acid / boron mea-surement; specific conductivity measurement)
| |
| (3) CVCS letdown outlet - B, SC, pH (4) Steam generator blowdown - C1 (chloride concentra-tion measurement)
| |
| (5) Spent fuel pool demineralizers - SC, pH (6) Downstream blowdown - pH Also, removes 'X' from the ' Continuous Analyzers' column of the spent fuel pool demineralizers' section.
| |
| These changes are to be made to the FSAR, because:
| |
| (1) pH is not required of SIS accumulators per the Westinghouse guidelines; (2) parameters measured on the inlet and outlet of the CVCS demineralized is not required per the Westinghouse guidelines; (3) the steam generator blowdown contains no inline C1 analyzer:
| |
| (4) there will no longer be any inline monitors on the spent fuel pool purification system; (5) there are no inline pH meters on the steam genera-tor blowdown system.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No l lable 9.3-4 See Sheet No(s):01,02, and 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises Process Sampling System system description, chemistry requirements and parameters based on recent design modifications.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises the following chemistry requirements for the Process Sampling System based on Westinghouse chemistry specification guidelines.
| |
| The column entitled, ' Normal Sample Flow (gpm)' is re-vised to read, ' Minimum Sample Flow (gpm).' In addi-tion, the flow values within the column have been changed, to reflect the modification of flow regulators to increase flow to ensure that the sample can be routed to the Volume Control Tank.
| |
| | |
| t Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 212 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 9.3-5. See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction of name of radioactive waste tank from
| |
| " Batch Tank" to " Waste Conditioning Tank."
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects table-drawing inconsistencies. Also editorial correction to show hot phase separator is part of Cond-ensate Polishing System.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section:.9.3.5 SER/SSER Impact: No l Table 9.3-5 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds Condensate Polishing System to list of potentially radioactive liquid storage tanks.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects table to as-built design.
| |
| Group: 4 SER/SSCR Impact: No Figure 9.3-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Four-inch service air line is removed to prevent use of service air as a backup (supplement) to instrument air capacity.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The service air line is removed as the service air system is no longer needed as a backup air supply for the instrument air system. The Design Engineering Package states that the instrument air system will have adequate capacity to meet system demand upon the im;olementation of the applicable design modification. l The Design Engineering Package further states that I because of past problems with unwanted oil and water contaminating the instrument air system quality and purity whenever this line is utilized, the line should be removed upon the implementation of the design j modification.
| |
| i Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-1, 3 See Sheet No(s):01 (Sh. 1 - 4), 03 (Sh. 3 - 5, 8)
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Miscellaneous editorial changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| 4 Justification:
| |
| 1 u___.________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
| |
| | |
| L y l Attachment- -to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989L
| |
| ~Page 213 of 439
| |
| 'FSAR Page
| |
| .(as amended) Description Changes are miscellaneous editorial changes on the compressed air system drawings, such as the addition of an isolation valve, tag numbers, notes, line numbers, instrument and valve tag numbers, reducers'and line
| |
| ; sizes.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ' Figure 9.3-1, 2 See Sheet No(s):01 (Sh. 2 -.4) and 02-(Sh. 1)
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| '( Addition)-
| |
| Adds new air supply to new auxiliary boiler and' chemical feed system pump. Also adds cross-connect between Units 1 and 2 for operational flexibility.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| (1) Adds new instrument air supply to the new auxiliary boiler for the air-operated valves / components and
| |
| -service air supply for fuel oil atomizing. (89-076)
| |
| (2) Adds new service air supply to the portable air-driven chemical transfer pump for the chemical feed system in the Safeguards Building. (88-801)
| |
| (3) Adds the cross-connect between Units 1 & 2 instrument air system for operational flexibility-to utilize Unit 2 dryers. (88-826)
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.3-1 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to relect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions including correcting tag nos.,
| |
| a_dding tag nos., adding instrument air supply, and correcting drafting errors.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 93 SER/SSER 1mpact: No t Figure 9.3-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects figure by adding instrument air and service air for the new auxiliary boiler.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Existing electric auxiliary boiler is being replaced by a new oil-fired auxiliary boiler. The new installation requires instrument air for air-operated valves / components and service air for fuel oil atomizing.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| | |
| ~ Attachment to TXX-09201 May 1, 1989 Page 214 of 439 FSAR Page (as anended) Description Related SER Section: 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-1, 2 See Sheet No(s):03 :01 (Sh. 2),02 (Sh. 2),03 (Sh. 9)
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds connections to supply potable water, service ~ air, and instrument air to the water retreatment equipment, which was added.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The water retreatment system is being modified to improve production and reliability. Connections are required to provide potable water, service air and instrument air to the area.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-2 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Added drawing references to facilitate agreement between respective flow diagrams.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| , To facilitate agreement between respective flow diagrams.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-2 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes piping connection on figure to reflect as-built condition.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the piping configuration as a result of field verification. This change does not affect system operation.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-2 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Added valve and line, reconfigure piping and added indicators and general note.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Added valve and line, reconfigure piping, added flow diagram reference indicators and added note for general information to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . 1
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 215 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Figure 9.3-3 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to' reflect as-built conditions including deleting air supplies, installing additional accumulator capacity, adding air supplies,and adding valves.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER impact: No Figure 9.3-3 See Sheet No(s):09
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds class breaks and pipe line number to Instrument Air Piping route from yard to pump house.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-4 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the figure to reflect the replacement of 3/4-inch pipe reactor coolant loop sample lines with 3/8-inch tubing, and the addition of a thermal relief valve.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Sample line size is reduced to increase sample velocity and minimize the total purge volume per Westinghouse recommendation. Adds thermal relief valve to comply with ASME Section III, subpart NC/ND-7155 and provide overpressure protection from thermal expansion of fluid contained within isolable piping around penetration.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.3-4 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 03 and 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correct drafting errors on process sample flow diagrams Justification:
| |
| To reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| | |
| 'I j Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989
| |
| - Page 216 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Figure 9.3-4 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 03 and 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Change valve tag nos. and drawing class from class 1 to class 2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-4 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 03 and 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Add tag nos., flow indicators, and check valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To insure proper sample flows to the radiation monitor and to prevent backflow and mixing of the various generators during sampling.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.3-4 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 03 and 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Delete tubing, valves, temperature indicators, flow indicators, specific conductivity monitors, and specific conductivity cells.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Spent fuel pool demineralizers 1 & 2 inlet and outlet sample lines are no longer used for continuous sampling and on line analysis.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-5 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes reflect as-built conditions including line numbers, drawing symbols, and continuation tags.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-5 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correct drawing symbols, continuation tags, and line numbers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| .May 1, 1989 l
| |
| Page 217 of 439 I
| |
| FSAR Page
| |
| '(as amended) Description Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-6 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes reflect as-built conditions including line numbers, valve positions, and pipe classifications.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-6 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correct line nos., valve postions, and p.ipe classifications.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-6, 7 See Sheet No(s):06 (Sh. 1) and 07 (Sh. 3 and 4)
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Upgrade to drain system.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| (1) Increases line size of drains due to insufficient drain capacity experienced during system testing.
| |
| (88-604)
| |
| (2) Upgrades run of piping from safeguards building floor drain sumps 1 and 2 to the floor drain tank to safety class 3 to ensure that ESF equipment is i protected from flooding. (88-733)
| |
| (3) Adds various drain lines and drains from laundry holdup and mcnitor tanks 1 & 2, since they were left out due to drafting errors. (88-920)
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.3 SER/SSET Impact: No Figure 9.3-7 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 06
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrected labels, numbers, continuation tags and piping configurations, and deleted sources.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrected labels and line numbers, continuation tags, valve numbers and position, piping configuration, line classifications, and deleted non-connected sources to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| conditions, i
| |
| | |
| Attachment ' to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 218 of 439 FSAR Page .
| |
| Description (as amended)
| |
| Group: 3 Related SLR Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-7 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Reroute of hot shop (room 39) drains to Unit 1 Sump #8.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| After Unit 1 startup, hot shop drains must be kept in Unit 1 controlled areas and systems so that radwaste contamination is not spread.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-8 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the figure to reflect the reroute of Turbine '
| |
| Building sump #1 discharge and the removal of the sample pump.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The two different sump pump flow rate, and logic problems involving the sample pump made 1PE-5100 unreliable. Routing sump #1 to sump #2 allowed the removal of the somple pump and proper operation of the restriction orifice.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-8 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor technical changes to reflect as-built condition.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the valve, XV0312 position, from nor:nally open global valve to normally closed gate valve, and adds interfaces to the sampling system to reflect as-built condition.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-9 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial) 1 Justification:
| |
| Change line numbers to eliminate "R" designations which were added due to a drafting error.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No L_____________._
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May_1, 1989 Page 219 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Figure 9.3-9 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) j Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| ; Justification:
| |
| Changes reflect as-built condtions including line -
| |
| designations, valve numbers, and flow arrows. ,
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-9 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects line designations, valve numbers, flow arrows, and Auxiliary Boiler and Condenser interfaces.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Sectiori: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-9 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds a valve.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-9 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) l Justification:
| |
| Corrects the flow direction for the check valve which is consistent with the design function of the piping system. ,
| |
| Group: 4 '
| |
| Related SER Section: 9.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| : 1) Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built conditions including adding lock closed, safety class breaks, and flex hoses, revising I continuation flags, end closures, note locations, l' drawiv, symbols, valve nos.. Also deleted a valve to I match as-built conditions.
| |
| : 2) Corrects note 4 to provide engineering requirements l
| |
| | |
| l b l
| |
| ' Attac'h' ment. to TXX-89201
| |
| 'May 1,.1989
| |
| .Page'220 of 439 Is FSAR Page !
| |
| (as amended). Description for check valve location as 'per Westinghouse design input.
| |
| Group: 3 K Related SER Section: 9.3.4-SER/SSER Impact: No I Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revised note 4 to provide engineering requirements for l:
| |
| check valve location.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| ' Requirements provided by Westinghouse letter TBX-M1240.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect- as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes reflect as-built conditions including continuation tags and line numbers.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):01, 03, 05, 06 and 07
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial) .
| |
| Miscellaneous editorial changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous editorial changes are made to reflect as-built conditions, such as hermetically seal diaphragms, change in line sizes, interchange of valve tags, change of equipment numbers, addition of line designations, change of Code class of stuffing box coolant, and the addition of a drain line.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SEr'SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built conditions including adding lock closed, safety class breaks, steam leakoff continuation, and revising piping configuration, valve nos., and end closures.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| | |
| ''m Attachment May 1, 1989 to TXX-89201-Page,221 of 439
| |
| .FSAR Page (as amended) Description Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| . Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correct piping configuration, valve postion, and piping classification. Added pressure switch.
| |
| . Justification:
| |
| Changes reflect as-built condition including piping configuration, valve postion, piping classification, and additional pressure switch.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER'Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| '(Correction)
| |
| Replace orifice plate, added shield wall 'and added valve stem extensions.
| |
| ' Justification:
| |
| Replaced orifice plate, added shield wall and added~
| |
| valve stem extensions to reflect as-built conditions'.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure-.9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes the direction of air flow for Boron Measurment System to correct drafting error.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| . Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):03 and 07.
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds ' lock close' status to CVCS valves.
| |
| : i. Justification:
| |
| (1) Adds ' lock close' status to CVCS' valves to_ prevent inadvertent openings of the valves which could dilute CVCS and RCS by introducing reactor makeup water.
| |
| (88-847)
| |
| (2) Adds ' lock close' status for the cross-ties isolation between Units 1 & 2 to enhance flexibility of Unit 1 operation while Unit 2 is under construction.
| |
| (88-846)
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 L SER/SSER Impact: No u
| |
| | |
| w + ,
| |
| l ] ~' _
| |
| ,t .
| |
| r
| |
| _. Attachment'' to TXX289201
| |
| .May 1, 1989
| |
| .Page 222:of'439.
| |
| FSAR Page
| |
| -(as' amended) Description-i- Figure 9.3 SeeShectNo(s):04 l- .
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)-
| |
| Corrected piping configurations and line numbers and added class break symbols.-
| |
| r Justification:
| |
| Corrected the following: flinge locations, relief valve direction, flow direction, line numbers, continuation flags, piping configurations.; and added class break symbols to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related.SER Section:~9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No r
| |
| Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| ; Shows temporary strainers for the charging and positive.
| |
| displacement pump trains in the Chemical and Volume.
| |
| Control System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Shows-temporary strainers for the charging and posit.ive displacement pump trains.in the Chemical and Volume Control System. A strainer is placed in the spool piece during initial flushing operation, and is to be removed at plant startup.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-10. See Sheet No(s):06
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Piping configuration additions and revisions to reflect current as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Added flow reducers, revised continuation flags, revised piping configuration.and.added safety class break to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):07
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification: l Miscellaneous minor technical changes to match as-built conditions including revising piping configurations and valve numbers.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No i F 1
| |
| __ =_ -_ _ a
| |
| | |
| a Attach'ent m to :TXX i89201-
| |
| . :May 1, 1989
| |
| ,PageL223 of.439 FSAR Page. .
| |
| ;(as amended) Description E
| |
| ' Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):07a i
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| L(Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| L Adds-line numbers and changes the CVCS drawing to correctLthe drafting errors and reflect the as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| ~Related SER Section:'9.3.4
| |
| .SER/SSER Impact: No L
| |
| ' Figure 9.3-10 :See Sheet No(s):08
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| -(Correction)
| |
| Add line numbers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section:.9.3 SER/SSER. Impact:'No
| |
| -Figure 9.3 See Sheet No(s)iO8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) i-Correct line nos., valve types, and symbol locations.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact:.No-Figure 9.-3-10 See Sheet.No(s):09
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Revised various lines, numbers and symbols _and corrected various CAD errors.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revised various vent and drain lines, line numbers,
| |
| . instrument numbers, valve symbols, added class breaks, L added flanges and tube adapters, revised location of shield wall symbol and corrected various CAD errors.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes reflect as-built conditions including tag numbers, pipe class, and line numbers.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| i, Attachment' Lto TXX-89201:
| |
| Mayll, 1989 .
| |
| i T Page,224''of 439.
| |
| 'FSAR Page (as amended) ' . Description Figure 9.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| :(Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect'as-built conditions.
| |
| E
| |
| -Justification: ~
| |
| Changes reflect as-built conditions including line numbers, valve tag numbers, and pipe classifications.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No-Figure 9.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Add Unit.I and 2 separation.
| |
| E Justification:
| |
| To reflect es-built cenditions.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| .Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure-9.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises Boron Recycle System to Class 5.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To reflect revised design criteria.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-11' See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds reducer to branch-lines in Boron Recovery System to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group:.3 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects label for valve XBR-009.
| |
| Group: 3 i Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Makes minor changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The purpose of these miscellaneous editorial / drafting is to accurately reflect as-built conoitions, such as
| |
| | |
| o -
| |
| {.
| |
| :( . . . .
| |
| Attachment. to TXX-89201-
| |
| . May?1, 1989 .
| |
| Page 225 of'439
| |
| [ '
| |
| FSAR Page-Description (as amended) changes in valve line numbers,' valve status, equipment tag numbers, and system class breaks.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: 'No
| |
| ; Figure 9.3-11 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions of the Boron Recycle System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes for the Boron Recycle System to reflect as-built condition including removing Unit 2 isolation flanges, correcting valve tag-number, adding heat tracing and U2/U1 separation, and incorporation of. reclassification of BR system from 3 to 5. Minor modifications to the vent condenser'and eductor, Reycle and waste evaporator.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| 'Relat'ed SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-11 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Relocates vent valve XBR-8695 to reflect the as-built condition.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-11 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| -(Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds pipe category change in boron recycle system which reduces the local stress at anchor locations and increases the pipe wall thickness.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.3-11 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Relocates the vent line which is consistent with the boron recycle evaporator package.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| -_-u-mm_-_-_____.____-.._.__-.___._m_._..a_ -
| |
| | |
| ''I P ,
| |
| Att'achment Lto TXX-89201 ,
| |
| . May 1~, 1989 a 1 Page 226 of.439.
| |
| FSAR Page
| |
| ,, . (as amended). : Description Figure 9.3-11 See Sheet No(s):02 and 03 L
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) .
| |
| Incorporates. changes to. correct the inability of the vent condenser eductor to drain.. condensate during low flow operation and the inability of the' design of the.
| |
| vent' condenser to prevent air inleakage or pressure
| |
| ; surges. Adds new line numbers on. recycle evaporator.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes are necessary to correct the following problems: (1) the vent condenser eductor wi11 not drain i
| |
| condensate during ~ 10w flow operation,. and (2) the "present" design of the vent condenser does not prevent-air inleakage or' pressure surges. (88-552)
| |
| Certain pipe line numbers were assigned twice. To eliminate duplicate. numbers, new line numbers are to be assigned to the lines on the recycle evaporator.
| |
| (89-002)
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-11 See Sheet Nc(s):02 and 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Modifications to'the Boron Recycle Evaporator based on-recommendations in the Radwaste Management Study-eliminate potential operational, maintenance, and ALARA concerns.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Substitute safety valve (& drain.li_ne) for rupture. disk' on evapoator condenser,. add temperature indicator with alarm on vent _line downstream of the safety valve.
| |
| Install a check valve in stripping column drain to the l' evaporator. Ramove spring from check valve. Add thermostatic vent trap in the vent line from the evaporator condenser to the vent condenser. The new thermostatic-trap will be located above the ' relocated vent condenser. Remove valve which is unnecessary with the use of the thermostatic trap.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects typographical error to reference appropriate FSAR section.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 1
| |
| | |
| m
| |
| ' Attachment to.TXX-89201.
| |
| -May 1,:1989 U Page 227 of:439 i-FSAR Page (as amended)- Description
| |
| .9.4-4, 5 'See Page No(s):06,08,10-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Removal'of control room isolation from chlorine detectors.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Discussion of chlorine detectors and automatic.
| |
| isolation functions due to these: detectors. is removed.
| |
| See discussions in App 1A(B), 2.2, and 6.4.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4.1 SER/SSER Impact::Yes SER.Section 9~.4.1 is not consistent as a result.of this change.
| |
| 9.4-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds description of the actuation of-the isolation mode.
| |
| in the Control Room Ventilation System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The description of.the actuation of the isolation mode is added to reflect an as-built condition, as it was inadvertently left out.
| |
| Group:.3 Related SER Section: 9.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.'4-13, 16 See Page No(s):18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Makes miscellaneous technical corrections to the design bases and system description of the Spent Fuel Pool Area Ventilation System to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Makes the following miscellaneous technical corrections to the design. bases'and system description of the Spent-Fuel Pool Aret Ventilation System:
| |
| (1) Table 9.4-2 is referenced, instead of a specific temperature, with regard to the ambient temperature at which the Building is normally maintained to provide consistency and a central point of reference.
| |
| (2) The maximum ambient temperature for the spent fuel pool heat exchanger and pump rooms during a LOCA with a loss-of-offsite power has been changed from ' maintained below 122 F' to ' maintained below 122 F, though the
| |
| , temperature may rise to 129 F for a short duration'.
| |
| This change is being made as a result of a revised cal-culation.
| |
| (3) 'LOCA or loss of offsite power' has been added to the conditions under which the fuel handling area vent-ilation system is designed to maintain a slight nega-I tive pressure.
| |
| (4) 'Non-ESF' has been added to the modular exhaust filtration unit, as a clarification.
| |
| (5) ' Category I' is being removed from the description
| |
| | |
| J>
| |
| Attachment to'TXX-89201-May 1,-1989 Page:228 of 439
| |
| ~
| |
| FSAR Page-
| |
| '(as amended)' Description of the spent fuel pool exhaust fans to reflect an'as-built condition.
| |
| Group: 2.
| |
| Related.SER Section: 9.4.2 SER/SSER. Impact: No 9.4-18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)'
| |
| Replaces an FSAR section reference with text, describ-ing inspection and testing requirements for the Spent Fuel Pool Area Ventilation System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The. text has' been added to more specifically describe .
| |
| the inspection and i.csting requirements for the Spent Fuel Pool' Area Ventilation System.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4-19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision).
| |
| Makes miscellaneous technical corrections to the design bases of the Auxiliary Building and Radwaste Area Ventilation System to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Makes the following two changes to the design bases of the Auxiliary Building and Radwaste Area Ventilation System to reflect as-built conditions:
| |
| (1) A specific temperature is replaced by a table ref-erence, indicating the ambient temperatures at which the building is normally maintained. This provides consistency and a central point of reference.
| |
| (2) The maximum ambient temperature for safety-related equipment rooms equipped with emergency fan coil units during loss of offsite power and LOCA has been changed from 'kept below 122 F' to 'kept below 122 F though the temperature may rise to 129 F for a short duration'.
| |
| This change is being made as a result of a revised cal-culation.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4-22, 23
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Makes miscellaneous technical corrections to the system description' of the Auxiliary Building and Radwaste Area Ventilation System to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Makes the following miscellaneous technical corrections to the system description of the Auxiliary and Radwaste Area Ventilation System:
| |
| (1) 'Non-ESF' has been added to the modular exhaust filtration unit, as a clarification.
| |
| (2) The sentence, 'Six exhaust units are required to
| |
| | |
| h' I . .
| |
| L 6ttachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 229 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description handle the Auxiliary Building air,' has been deleted, as a clarification.
| |
| (3) The number of identical non-ESF exhaust ventilation
| |
| , units and the number of ESF exhaust units has been
| |
| ! changed from 14 and 2 to 12 and 4, respectively. This is indicative of the upgrade of two units from non-ESF to ESF, as required by the implementation of negative pressure requirements.
| |
| (4) Seismic Category information for the Auxiliary Building and Radwaste Area Ventilation System has been revised to reflect the design as-built.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4.3
| |
| -SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4-24
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Supplements discussion of inspection and testing re-quirements for Auxiliary Building and Radwaste Area Ventilation System, and corrects a reference to an FSAR subsection.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The text has been added to more specifically address the criteria used in the inspection and testing of the Auxiliary Building and Radwaste Area Ventilation System. .The section reference change reflects the contents of subsection referenced, as revised.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4-27
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects FSAR subsection reference for inspection and testing requirements for the Turbine Building Area-Ventilation System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The correction of the FSAR subsection reference re-flects the contents of the subsection, as revised.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 9.4-28, 29
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Makes miscellaneous technical corrections to the design bases of the Engineered Safety Features Ventilation System to reflect as-built conditions and to implement the negative pressure criteria.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Makes the following miscellaneous technical corrections to the design bases of the Engineered Safety Features Ventilation System:
| |
| (1) 'LOCA with loss of offsite power' is changed to
| |
| 'LOCA and loss of offsite power' to reflect the condi-
| |
| | |
| 'Aktachment''toTXX-89201-
| |
| [' May 1, 1989. .
| |
| L ''Page'230 of 439
| |
| :FSAR'Page
| |
| -(as amended) .' Description tion under.which the Engineered Safety Features Venti-lation System is. designed to.-maintain a slight negative pressure.
| |
| (2) '2' ESF exhaust filtration units has been revised to '4' to reflect the upgrade.of two units from.non-ESF 1 to ESF.
| |
| 8 (3) The maximum environmental qualification temperature for the ESF pump rooms during a LOCA and loss of off-site power has been changed from 'below 122.F' to 'be-D low 122 F though the temperature may rise to 129 F for a short duration. This change is being made as a re-sult of a revised calculation.
| |
| .(4) The description of-the energizing of ESF exhaust
| |
| , fans is revised for. clarification and to add the Auxi-liary Fuel Handling Building in lieu of the ' controlled access area' as an area in which the ESF exhaust fans are automatically. energized to maintain a slightly negative pressure. The latter change reflects the as-built condition.
| |
| (5) The seismic category classification and safety-class design information presented for the exhaust sys-tem, the emergency fan coil units, and the main air supply system has been revised to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER-Section: 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4-30
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Makes miscellaneous technical additions and corrections to the system description of the Engineered Safety Features Ventilation System to reflect as-built conoi-tions and to implement negative pressure criteria.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Makes the following miscellaneous technical additions and corrections to the system description of the Engineered Safety Features Ventilation System:
| |
| (1) Paragraph is added to describe the components and the applicable criteria for the four ESF exhaust fil-tration units. This change adds information to reflect-as-built conditions.
| |
| (2) Adds ' electrical areas' to the contents of the com-partments for which emergency fan coil units are pro-vided. This addition reflects an as-built condition.
| |
| (3) "The cooling units" has been changed to "The emer-gency fan coil units", as a point of clarification.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| i
| |
| ' j" . Attachment' to TXX-89201
| |
| ~May 1, 1989' Page 231 of 439 o
| |
| R FSAR.Page .
| |
| L (as amended) Description 9.4-32
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Addition) .
| |
| Supplements discussion of inspection and testing re- ,
| |
| quirements.for the Engineered Safety Featu'es Ventila-'
| |
| tion System, and corrects a reference to an FSAR subsection.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds periodic testing of the HEPA and charcoal adsorb- >
| |
| ers as per.NRC Regulatory-Guide 1.52~for the Engineered Safety Features Ventilation System. .The section refer.
| |
| ence change reflects the contents of the subsection f F
| |
| reference, as revised.
| |
| Group:. 2 Related.SER Section: 9.4.5-SER/SSER Impact: No-9.4-32
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) .
| |
| Modifies the safety evaluation of ESF Ventilation System by adding evaluation for fire dampers and in-
| |
| .line radiation monitors. ,
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds the safety evaluation for. fire dampers in seismic -!
| |
| Category I exhaust ducts, which remains open during an 1 SSE. ,
| |
| Adds radiation monitoring of the exhaust ai'r by in-line-radiation monitors-to assess it's activity level and ex- j haust the air through a charcoal adsorber prior to dis- :
| |
| charge to the atmosphere. _:
| |
| Group: 3 i Related SER Section: 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 9.4-2 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) ,
| |
| Adds _ range of temperatures under normal plant condi- .!'
| |
| tions for the New Fuel Storage Pit.
| |
| Justification: ;
| |
| The range of temperatures (40 F - 120 F) under normal plant conditions was added for the New Fuel Storage ,
| |
| Pit. This area is not currently ventilated. -)
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 9.4-2 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds design conditions for Diesel Generator day tank and equipment rooms.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The FSAR table is changed to revise the diesel genera-tor, day tank and equipment rooms design conditions based on a revised calculation and to reflect the as-built design conditions.
| |
| | |
| r'
| |
| ;e Attachment; .to'TXX-89201' May 1, 1989.
| |
| .Page.232 of 439
| |
| 'i FSAR.Page (as amended) Description Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| [
| |
| ' Table 9.4-4 See Sheet No(s):02 I
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) .
| |
| l Corrects and revises efficiencies re: : filter design parameters utilized in the' calculation for a.radiologi-cal accident. Also, corrects information re: percent-e age of penetration (in-place testing) for Control Room
| |
| _ HVAC units as well as for all other: filtration units.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The efficiencies utilized in the calculation for a
| |
| . radiological accident as well as the percentage of
| |
| ~
| |
| penetration were not portrayed correctly on FSAR Table 9.4-4. Also, since there are several' efficiencies '
| |
| assigned to the ESF and non-ESF units, it was desirable to revise such information on the table.
| |
| Additional related SER Sections include 6.5.1, 9.4.1, 9.4.3,.and 9.4.5.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section 6.5.1, pages 6-20 & -21, dese.ribes the different efficiencies for different HVAC filter units.
| |
| NRC needs to review this FSAR-CR whic~n states that CR HVAC filter unit efficiency is 99%, efficiency for PPVS is 95%, and all other unit efficiencies'are 90%.
| |
| Table 9.4-8 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification: i Removes failure modes associated with chlorine detectors. See FSAR section 2.2 discussion.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds radiation monitor and tag numbers in Control Room u intake ducts.
| |
| '~
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The radiation monitors are added for redundancy in lieu of plant vent stack monitor in the Control Room intake duct. These monitors are required to isolate the Control Room in the event of high radiiation while complying with the redundancy and single failure criteria.
| |
| Group: 3 ed SER Section: 9.4.1 S. ER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| fAttachment ..to TXX-89201 May'1~, 1989 1 Page 233 of'439 1 i'
| |
| ..FSAR Page s (as amended) Description
| |
| -t Figure 9.4-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects air flow ' rates and directions for'the Control Room HVAC System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the' air flow rates and directions in the Control Room based on the revised calculation . The calculations were revised 'to ensure that unn itered infiltration rates into the Control Room did not exceed allowable values.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-1, 2 See Sheet No(s):01.(Sh. 1)
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes Ventilation System drawings with new flow rates, deletes gravity dampers, operator and instrument tag numbers on locked-open control dampers, changes and makes miscellaneous drafting changes.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revised flow rates'. based,on revised calculations are reflected on drawings along.with related miscellaneous changes, to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-1 See Sheet No(s)iO1 (Sh. 1)
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Change piping class on filtration units' deluge piping.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| A common mode event which would breach this low pressure Class 5 piping resulting in a-breach of air cleaning unit boundary is not expected.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-1, 4 See Sheet No(s):01 (Sh. 1) and 04 (Sh. 2)
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Drawing change shows new smoke' detectors, radiation monitors upgraded to 1E standards and relocated, and an added vent connection for the Control Room Air Conditioning System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The old smoke detectors were obsolete. New radiation monitors meet redundancy and separation requirements for a single failure. The vent connection exhausts radioactive gas from the CCW surge tank.
| |
| . Group: 3
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 234 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Related SER Section: 9.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-1 See Sheet No(s):01 and 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Removes detectors and reference to chlorine detection.
| |
| See discussion in App.1A(B), 2.2, and 6.4.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Sec 9.4.1 is not consistent as a result of this change.
| |
| Figure 9.4-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect the as-built condition.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions including locations of refrigerant piping, cooling coils, relief valves and piping breaks.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-1 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Miscellaneous editorial changes.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous editorial changes including figure title block changes.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.4-1 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the damper number to CPX-VADP00-16 instead of CPX-VADP00-22 for the isolation mode of the system.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-2, 14 See Sheet No(s):02 (Sh. 2)
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) '
| |
| l Replaces water supply to Control Room humidifier and adds gravity dampers and temperature indicators to ,
| |
| Auxiliary Building Room 100. I Justification:
| |
| Replaces demineralized water supply with potable water l
| |
| | |
| Attachment? to TXX-89201
| |
| , .May 1, 1989-
| |
| >Page.235 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description supply for Control Room HVAC system humidifiers.
| |
| (88-697)
| |
| Adds gravity dampers and temperature indication.for.
| |
| Room 100 in the Auxiliary Building.;(88-806):
| |
| Group: 4 .
| |
| Related SER Section: 9.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No l !! Figure 9.4-2 See Sheet No(s):02 and 03 L
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Delete damper operator and tag numbers. The. damper is locked open.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To prevent inadvertent overpressurization, the' damper will be locked open. Actuator and instrumentation are deleted from drawing to avoid confusion.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-2 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) .
| |
| Corrects the air flow rates for the Auxiliary and Fuel Building HVAC systems based on the revised calculation'.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Group: 2 l Related SER Section: 9.4.2-3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds a non-safety related Battery Room HVAC System for the new Battery Room and Charging Room. The new-Battery and Charging Room equipment is backup to provide DC power to the emergency lighting in the Control Room.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-3, 6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Misc. minor changes to match as-built plant.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes-reflect as-built conditions including flow, i valve symbol, line numbers, pipe class and tag numbers.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| r: 4 i
| |
| : Attachment Lto TXX-89201-May 1,'1989' Page 236 of 439 i
| |
| FSAR'Page ]
| |
| Description
| |
| ~
| |
| (as amended) ;
| |
| 1 Figure 9.4-3, 11 See Sheet No(s):11 (Shs. I and 2) '
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) .
| |
| Changes Non-Safety Chilled Water System drawings to- d conform to as-built conditions adding drain assemblies and heater, correcting line and valve numbers, flow rates, and making,other miscellaneous drafting changes.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes are required by calculation revisions and to reflect.as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 . 1 Related SER Section: 9.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-4, 5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) .
| |
| Changes Ventilation System drawings with new' flow rates, deletes gravity dampers, operator and instrument tag numbers on locked-open control dampers, changes and makes miscellaneous drafting changes.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revised flow rates based on revised calculations are reflected on drawings along with related miscellaneous changes, to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-4 See Sheet No(s):01, 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification: ,
| |
| Corrects the air flow rates and deletes gravity '
| |
| dampers for the-Safeguard and Electrical area HVAC- !
| |
| system, based on the revised calculation.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correct drawing to show one pressure switch rather than two for each pre-access filtration unit, to reflect as-built condition.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Only one pressure indication switch is provided for each unit to monitor high pressure differential accross the unit.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4 ,
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No l
| |
| k l
| |
| | |
| u gu;; -----------------m
| |
| [h
| |
| ' ^ '
| |
| ij n ttachment to;TXX-89201'
| |
| 'Y' , ' 5 May li,- 1989 --
| |
| 9'
| |
| * y 'f
| |
| < FSAR Page . 1
| |
| '(as amended).. Description I LFigure 9.4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| -(Correction) .
| |
| j Miscellaneous minor technical changes to relect the >
| |
| as-built condition of the Containment Hydrogen Purge
| |
| . Exhaust System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect; p as-built conditions including pressure; gauge, piping, and valve locations.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ' Figure.9.4 ,
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| -(Correction)
| |
| Correct line numbers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Line numbers on drawing do not agree with the line. list and the numbering method.
| |
| Group: 4 i Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| ' Figure 9.4-6,
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the figure to indicate HPS system de-classifi-cation to.be consistent with the changes described in Appendix 1A(B) page 1A(B)-3.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 6.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure.9.4-6, 8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction).
| |
| Changes Ventilation System drawings with new flow rates, deletes gravity dampers, operator and instrument tag numbers on locked-open control dampers, changes and makes miscellaneous drafting changes.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revised flow rates based on revised calculations''are' reflected on drawings along with related-miscellaneous changes, to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| > Group: 3 ,
| |
| Related SER Section: 9.4
| |
| : SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-6, 9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Change piping class on filtration units' deluge piping.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| A common mode event which would breach this low pressure Class 5 piping resulting in a breach of air cleaning unit boundary is not expected.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| -I Attachment .to fXX-89201
| |
| 'May 1, 1989.
| |
| Page 238 of 439 FSAR Page (asamended)- Descrip' tion
| |
| : . Figure 9.4-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Miscellaneous editorial changes.
| |
| Justification: .
| |
| Miscellaneous editorial' changes including updating figure. title block.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No L Figure 9.4-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Added islolation dampers'for the uncontrolled acce'ss area and electrical area HVAC_ systems to mitigate the effects of high energy'line breaks in room no. 113. l This change is submitted based on the HELB analysis' l calculation.
| |
| G roup ~: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4.3-4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| . Figure'9.4-9, 15.
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes Ventilation System drawings with new flow rates, deletes gravity dampers, operator and instrument tag numbers on locked-open control dampers, changes note, and makes miscellaneous drafting changes.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revised flow rates based on revised calculations are reflected on drawings along with related miscellaneous changes, to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No i
| |
| Figure 9.4-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) _ _ _
| |
| Show connection from Engineered Safety Features.Filtra-tion Units and fuel Building Exhaust directly to Primary Plant Ventilation System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This modification provides flexibility of utilizing any of the 16 filtration units (including the four ESF units) during various modes of PPVS operation.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4.4; SSER4 9.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) l Revises the flow diagram for primary plant supply and l exhaust ventilation to reflect the upgrade of two fil-1-
| |
| tration units from non-ESF to ESF.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises the flow diagram for primary plant supply and
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 1 Page 239 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description exhaust ventilation to reflect the upgrade of two fil-tration units from non-ESF to ESF. This is an as-built condition, and reflects implementation of negative pressure criteria.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4.5 SER/SSER impact: No Figure 9.4-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revise the figure to reflect the implementation of negative pressure criteria for the Primary Plant Ventilation System (PPVS).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revise the PPVS flow diagram including upgrading of 2 Non-ESF filtering units to ESF units, to maintain a slight negative pressure relative to ambient conditions during all modes of operation including following a LOCA,in the Auxiliary, Safegaurds, and Fuel buildings.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4.2-4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| , Figure 9.4-11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds the instrument tag numbers, valve tag numbers, and corrects the drafting errors to the non-safety Chilled Water System.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-11 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Misc. minor changes to match as-built plant.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes reflect as-built conditions including flow, valve symbol, line numbers, pipe class and tag numbers.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-11 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to relect as-built conditions of the Non-safety Chilled Water System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions including adding a vent valve, ,
| |
| temperature indicator, and pressure indicator.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4
| |
| | |
| Attachment 'to TXX-89201 May_1, 1989:
| |
| a- Page 240 of 439 q
| |
| L FSAR Page-
| |
| ! -(as amended). Description i SER/SSER Impact: No (Figure 9.4-11 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| , Miscellaneous editorial changes.
| |
| L Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous editorial changes including figure sheet number changes.
| |
| p Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.d-11' See Sheet No(s):04 ,
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Miscellaneous editorial changes. j
| |
| -Justification: {
| |
| Miscellaneous editorial changes including figure sheet number-changes.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4 SeeSheetNo(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Miscellaneous editorial changes.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous editorial changes including figure sheet number changes.
| |
| Group:.4 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-12
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Drawing changes reflect as-built condition of the Safety Chilled Water System including class breaks, piping and-valve symbols, removal of internals from sixteen active check valves, and locking all safety related cooling coil throttle valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrections required to reflect as-built conditions and system modifications. ;
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4.6 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-12, 15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes to match as-built plant.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Discharge of relief valve piping for refrigerant corrected to meet ASHRAE.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.4 i
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| L h
| |
| l Attachment 2 to TXX-89201 l
| |
| May 1, 1989 Page 241 of 439 l
| |
| l FSAR Page Description (as' amended)
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises the figure to add vent stacks and hot shop areas in the Turbine Building.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises the figure to add vent stacks and hot shops I decontamination areas in the exhaust path of the HVAC flow diagram. This flow diagram is revised to implement the slight negative pressure in the Auxiliary, Safeguard, and Fuel Building exhaust paths leading to the vent stacks.
| |
| Group: 2 .
| |
| Related SER Section: .9.4 I SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect as-built ;
| |
| conditions for CCWS. !
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect as-built conditions, such as the replacement of the drain lines shown with threaded drain plugs and the display of drain valves on drain lines coming out of HVAC unit skids.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4A-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes the containment vacuum relief function.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes the containment vacuum relief function based on the following cases:
| |
| : 1) Calculation revision resulted in lesser containment pressure than the design pressure during spurious actuation of containment spray when the unit is under normal operation.
| |
| (2) Containment pressure and temperature monitoring and operator action to shut the containment purge supply and containment coolers will avoid excessive cooling of the containment when the outside temperature is too low.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4A-6, 7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies information re: containment isolation valve ,
| |
| closure.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The containment isolation valves will close only on de-i
| |
| | |
| ql: 1
| |
| , : Attachment to.TXX-89201' May 1, 1989 ,
| |
| Page 242 off439 1 l t
| |
| 4FSAR Page . ,
| |
| -(as: amended)' ' Description tection of high radiation or oil a Phase A signal, not "on a Phase A isolation by a T signal."
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No P 9.48-1,j2- ;See Page No(s):03,04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises the system operation and controls to reflect the automatic temperature control in the Service Water Intake Structure Ventilation System, and makes certain ambient' temperature information consistent with Table .3 9.4-2.
| |
| Justification: ;
| |
| Automatic temperature control for Service Water Intake Structure (SWIS) exhaust fans is required to maintain SWIS area temperature.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section 9.4.5, re: Service Water Intake Structure
| |
| , , Ventilation System, took into account manual operation of the fans only.
| |
| 9.4C-5'
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises maximum ambient temperature for the Electrical y'.-
| |
| ! Area (Safeguards) Ventilation System during a LOCA.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| h The maximum ambient temperature for the Electrical Area (Safeguards) Ventilation. System in the event of a loss of offsite power or a LOCA is 122 F, although the temperature in the pump rooms may rise to 129 F for a 'l short period of time during 'a LOCA prior to stabilizing at 122 F, based on a revised calculation.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4C-1, 2 See Page No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds Diesel Generator Building Ventilation System unit heaters classification, design conditions, safety eval-uation, and inspection and testing requirements.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds the design conditions (normal and emergency), unit heater design classification, safety evaluation, testing and inspection requirements for the diesel gen-erator HVAC system to reflect the as-built design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No u
| |
| 9 j
| |
| | |
| +,
| |
| | |
| ==Attachment:==
| |
| .!to TXX-89201-LMayfi, 1989 ..
| |
| p :Page 243 ofl439 .
| |
| p h ' FSAR Page-
| |
| '(as: amended) Description F
| |
| 9.4D-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects plant ventilation discharge-vent stack size and shape, and deletes information re: effluent dis-charge quantity which is duplicated in an FSAR figure.,
| |
| Justification:
| |
| (1) The plant ventilation discharge vent is cylindrical in shape with a 66-inch diameter, which reflects the as-built design.
| |
| (2) Deletes the air' flow information given on FSAR page 9.40-2 and refers to Figure 9.4-9 for air flow and other. design parameters.
| |
| ;p Group: 3
| |
| .Related SER Section: 9.4.5
| |
| ! SER/SSER Impact: .No 9.4E-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| . Corrects the cooling units and the cooling coil con-L trols location to reflect.as-built conditions.
| |
| ~
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the cooling units and the cooling coil con-trols location-to reflect as-built conditions. Speci-fically, the thermostatically-controlled valve for the Turbine Building Switchgear Area cooling coils i.s lo-cated at the inlet of the coils, not the outlet.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4F-1, 2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies the ASME B&PV Code requirements for the de-sign of the chillers and piping of the Safety Chilled Water System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The Safety Chilled Water System chillers were designed in accordance with ASME B&PV Code Sections III & Vill, the piping was designed per ASME B&PV Code Section III.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| -9.5-14, 15 See Page No(s):18, 19, 20, 23, 104, 121, 145
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Change diesel generator day tank protection from deluge suppression to automatic preaction sprinkler.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changing the automatic deluge suppression system in each of.the diesel generator fuel oil day tank rooms to an automatic preaction system provides a level of protection commensurate with the hazard, yet eliminates concerns of seismically induced inadvertent system operation. This change will not adversely affect the ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in the
| |
| | |
| w g O:
| |
| s" '1 M
| |
| | |
| ==Attachment:==
| |
| to TXX-89201:
| |
| iMay.1, 1989 Page 244 of 439
| |
| ,,g m FSAR Page. ' .
| |
| '(as amended) Description event of a fire.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SSER Section: SSER12.9.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No I :9.5-16, 17 SeePageNo(s)*20,22,23,74,76,87,91,92,110,116-119l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Clarify existing fire protection system design and describe new fire water supply system.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes water supplied to the four containment. pre-access-filter units. Demineralized water is now directly supplied to the appropriate unit. Delete exceptions to APCSB 9.5-1, App A sections E.1.a, and E.2.a. Added the description of the diesel fuel fired boiler to F.18.of APCSB 9.5-1 App. A. These changes will not adversely affect the ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in the event of a fire.
| |
| Group: 2-Related SSER Section: SSER12 9.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No i L 9.5-17
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) j Downgrade Seismic Cat I Fire Protection valves to ;
| |
| Seismic Cat II.
| |
| Justification: "
| |
| Fire Protection valves originally designated as Seismic p Category I have been downgraded to a Seismic Category b
| |
| II classification. This revised classification does not require the valves to remain functional during or after a siesmic event. The Seismic Category 11 requirement applies to the mounting of the valves so !
| |
| that they do not present a hazard to safety.-related ,
| |
| equipment. This change does not adversely affect the !
| |
| ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in the ;
| |
| event of a fire.
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| 'i L Related SSER Section: SSER12 9.5.1 L SER/SSER Impact: No 9.5-47
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Provide an update of the organization changes to the QA Program for fire protection.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Remove references to the Operational Administrative Control and Quality Assurance Plan. Provide references to section 17 of the FSAR. This change will not affect the ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in the event of a fire.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SSER Section: SSER12 9.5.1 y SER/SSER Impact: No Q-. ____2_________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
| |
| | |
| 1 L.:
| |
| 1 Attachment' to1TXX-89201
| |
| [* ' May 1, 1989 Page 245 of 439 ] l d
| |
| FSAR Page n -(as amended) Description j F i 9.5-65
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision).
| |
| Allow the use of gas and smoke seals in areas where suppression and detection are provided. .,
| |
| Justification: o Revise to allow for the use of gas and smoke seals in.
| |
| areas of the plant where suppressio'n and detection.are provided on~both sides:of.the barrier. The current seal design description permits use of a gas and smoke seal on both sides of the barrier where neither.
| |
| suppression and detection are present. Use of gas and smoke seals on both sides of the barrier with suppression and detection are present;is conservative since this seal configuration is acceptable without suppression and detection. This change does not-adversely affect the ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in the event.of a fire.
| |
| Group: 2 1 Related SSER Section: SSER12 9.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER does not presently address the use of gas and smoke seals.
| |
| 9.5-96 .
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Provide description of raceway located under the Control Room Center Console.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| L Raceway is provided und.er the control room center console. -These cables are installed in steel conduits with no exposed combustibles under the raised platform. The cables provided are for data communication and low voltage power service. The Control Room area is continuously manned and the area adjacent to the cabinets is monitored by ionization type smoke detectors. The Control Room Center Console is constructed of non-combustible materials.
| |
| The above changes, as described, will not adversely affect the ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in the event of a fire.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SSER Section: SSER12 9.5.1.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.5-96, 117
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revise deviation to APCSB 9.5-1, Appendix A - section D.3.f to include communication cables Justification:
| |
| Revise deviation to include non-IEEE 383 and PVC jacketed communication cables. These cables do not represent a significant hazard. This change does not adversely affect the ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in the event of a fire.
| |
| | |
| Attachment T to TXX-89201.
| |
| -May=1, 1989
| |
| ,~, .Page'246 of 439.
| |
| FSAR Page -
| |
| (as a.nended) Description
| |
| ~ G'roup: 2 Related SSER Section: SSER12 9.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes
| |
| '9.5.-133
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies discussion on fire safe shutdown relative to safe egress / evacuation paths.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes discussion on safe egress / evacuation paths from
| |
| ,.. discussion on fire safe shutdown, since the eeacuation H paths are not part of the 8-hour lighting provided for .
| |
| fire safe shutdown. A new paragraph is 3rovided for 1 evacuation paths in the plant. This lig1 ting is installed per the recommendations of the Illuminating
| |
| ;- Engineering Society of North America 1981 Application
| |
| . Volume (Reference 17 in FSAR Section 9.5).
| |
| ' Group: 3
| |
| -Related SER Section: 9.5.3 n SER/SSER Impact: No 9.5-141,-142
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes description of duplex strainers in the fuel oil transfer pump discharge lines and replaces it with a previous description of Y-strainers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes the 40-mesh duplex. strainers to 100-mesh Y-strainers in the fuel oil transfer pump discharge lines, as the plant schedule does.not permit this enhancement modification.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.5-144, 145
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial) '
| |
| Adds Q&R reference to FSAR page margin.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 0040.74 is being added to the margin, as a minor edi-torial correction.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.5-146
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects 0&R 040.25 to Q&R 040.75 in the left margin due to a typographical error.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| E
| |
| 'x0 LAttachment' to TXX-89201-pE q, May 1, 1989
| |
| : f. ,
| |
| Page 247 of'439-FSAR Page b' (asamended) - Description y
| |
| 9.5-147, 155-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises the temperature of the service water used as a L cooling medium.for the maximum heat produced by the 4 diesel-generator sets.
| |
| 7 Justification:
| |
| Corrects the temperature of the service water used as a cooling medium for the maximum heat produced by the-diesel generator sets, by raising it from 105 F to 115 F. The ' service water temperature revision is ref-erenced in the' revised calculation.
| |
| Group:.2 Related SER Section. 9.5.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes SER Section 9.5.5 states, "The various components are sized to remove the maximum heat' produced by the diesel
| |
| . generator sets using 105 F service water as a cooling medium." This temperature is being revised in the FSAR to 115 F.
| |
| 9.5-151
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| -(Correction)
| |
| ' Corrects the setpoints of the diesel starting air compressors, and makes a typographical correction of r the. dew point associated with the in-line dryers of the L'
| |
| diesel generator air system.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| (1) Corrects the setpoints of the diesel starting air n compressors (based on the revised calculation), to support the required five starts of the diesel engines.
| |
| (2) Corrects the dew point associated with the in-line dryers of the diesel generator air system; it should'be
| |
| -40 F, not 40 F.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.5.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.5-152
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Adds to the design criteria and revises testing of cer-tain components of the Diesel Generator Starting Sys-tem, which are exceptions to ASME B&PV Code, Section III, Class 3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The compressors, aftercoolers, and air dryers are -
| |
| designed to manufacturer's standards (including Seismic 11 requirements), and are pressure tested pneumati-cally. These components are commercially-supplied items. Seismic Category 1 is not required as the starting air accumulator tanks contain air to supply the required number of starts for the diesel engines.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.5.6 ,
| |
| u --____-_---_--_~xa----_ _ - _ _ _ _ . - - - - - - - - - , _--- _ _
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 248 of 439 FSAR Page description 1
| |
| (as amended)
| |
| SER/SSER impact: Yes SER Section 9.5.6 notes that "these components are de-signed to manufacturer's standards and undergo seismic operability testing." " Seismic operability testing" is being deleted from the FSAR; see " Justification" above.
| |
| 9.5-157
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the system description of the diesel generator lube oil system to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the system description of the diesel generator lube oil system to reflect as-built conditions:
| |
| (1) The ' motor-driven keep-warm pump' is actually the
| |
| ' motor-driven prelube pump.' j (2) The motor-driven prelube pumps draws oil from the sump and passes it through a strainer and a filter, not an electrically heated bypass filter, since no electri-cal bypass heater exists.
| |
| (3) The heater is actually an electrical immersion heater located in the sump, and this clarification has also been added to the system description.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 9.5.7 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section 9.5.7 indicates that a " motor-driven keep-warm pump" is used, and that oil from the sump passes through "an electrically heated bypass filter." The pump and filter are the subject of this FSAR correction.
| |
| 9.5-166
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Change code year for NFPA-20 from 1974 to 1983.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The centrifugal fire pumps were previously replaced with new pumps. The applicable code year for the new pumps is 198:! I Group: 4 i Related SSER Section: SSER12 9.5.1.5 l SER/SSER Impacti No Table 9.5-12
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the failure mode and effects analysis of diesel generator cooling water system to reflect as-built conditions and system operations.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the failure mode and effects analysis of diesel generator cooling water system to reflect as-built conditions in the following areas:
| |
| (1) Effect(s) on System is revised for: water heat ex-changers, engine jackets transfer lines, motor-driven keep-warm circulating water pump, and the standby i electric heater.
| |
| | |
| o Attachment ~ to TXX-89201 May 1,-1989L Page 249 of'439
| |
| 'FSAR-Page
| |
| -(as amended) Description (2) Method'of' Failure Detection is revised for: engine.
| |
| _ jacket- transfer lines.
| |
| (3) Effects on Subsystem is revised for: . engine jacket L transfer lines, water heat exchangers, standby _ electric heater and~ motor-driven keep-warm circulating pump.
| |
| (4) Failure Mode is revised for:_ motor-driven keep-warm-circulating water pump.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| -Related SER Section: 9.5.5-SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| -Table 9.5-13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the failure mode and effects analysis of diesel generator starting system for IEG1 to reflect as-built conditions and system operations.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| : Corrects the failure mode and effects analysis of diesel generator starting-system for 1EG1 to reflect-as-built conditions and system operations in the following areas:
| |
| (1) Effect(s) on System is revised for: air lines; com
| |
| -(2) pressor, af Subsystem Effects on tercooler and air dryer;for:
| |
| is r'evised and, airtank.
| |
| lines and manifold.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section:.9.5.6 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 9.5-14
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the failure mode and effects analysis of the diesel generator lubrication system to reflect as-built conditions and system operations.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the failure mode and effects analysis of the diesel generator lubrication system to reflect as-built conditions and system operations in the following areas:
| |
| (1) Revises the function, failure mode, cause.of failure, method of failure detection, and effect on system for the following:
| |
| (a) The lube oil heater (formerly the filter heater),
| |
| (~b) The pre-lube pump-(formerly the keep-warm pump),
| |
| (c) The strainers and filters (formerly the strainer).
| |
| (2) The Method of Failure Detection is revised for:
| |
| transfer lines and valves, and cooler.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.5.7 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| n ,. .
| |
| k u4 L-1Att'achment'' to TXX-89201' May 1,.1989-
| |
| .Page 250'of 439 FSAR'Page .
| |
| (as amended). Description o '
| |
| Table-9.5-15 See. Sheet No(s):01,02 H
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the. failure mode and effects analysis of the-diesel generator (combustion; air' intake and exhaust system) to reflect as-built conditions and system-operations.
| |
| Justification: ~
| |
| Corrects the failure mode and effects analysis of the diesel generator (combustion air intake and exhaust system) to reflect as-built conditions and system operations.in the'following areas:
| |
| (1) The function, failure mode, cause of failure, effect on subsystem, method of failure detection, and effect on system is revised for the following:
| |
| '(a) The turbocharger air intercooler (formerly the turbocharger air after-cooler).
| |
| (b) the exhaust gas pipes and flexible connection.
| |
| -(2) The Remedial. Action column for all items listed is deleted.
| |
| (3) The method of failure detection and effect on sys-tem is revised for-the intake air pipes and. flexible hose.
| |
| (4) The failure mode is revised for the intake air filter.
| |
| -(5) The effect on system is revised for the air intake silencer.
| |
| (6) The effect on subsystem, method of failure detec-tion, and effect on system is revised for the muffler.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.5.8 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 9.5-18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the jacket water cooler design parameters.
| |
| 3 Justification:
| |
| Corrects the jacket water cooler parameters based'on a revised calculation.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.5.8 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.5-43, 61 See Sheet Nc(s):1.2-27
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification: '
| |
| Clarify description of " Service Water Pump House" to
| |
| " Service Water Intake Structure". Correct drawings for
| |
| . c l a ri ty.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SSER Section: SSER12 9.5.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to'TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 251 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description
| |
| : l. Figure 9.5-46 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Add hose test connection to the fire water supply system.
| |
| l Justification:
| |
| Add hose test connection to reflect design changes.
| |
| This change does not affect the Fire Protection Program as was reviewed by the staff, nor does this change affect the ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in the event of a fire.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SSER Section: SSER12 9.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: ho Figure 9.5 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions for the D/G auxiliary systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes to reflect as-built conditions including adding fuel oil " grab sample" connections, deleting lock closed / lock open from various valves, adding test plugs for valves, correcting piping class, adding details for drain traps 4 piping on D/G starting air compressors af ter cooler and '
| |
| air reciever, and correcting drawing notes.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.5.4&6 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.5-52 See Sheet No(s):01,02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Updates drawing to: add lines; changeout carbon to stainless steel lines; revise locations of two instruments; add fuel oil sample taps to fuel oil day tanks; and change certain piping from Class "G" to "5".
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Updates the drawing to incorporate the following changes:
| |
| (1) Start air receiver drip traps material change from carbon s+ eel to stainless steel to allow for corrosion resistance (88-479); ,
| |
| (2) Relocate the pressure taps to meet as-built I conditions (88-671);
| |
| (3) Add the new lines for installation of ultrsonic level indicators to the fuel oil storage tanks (88-461):
| |
| (4) Changes piping seismic Class "G" to piping Class "5" to meet the requirements of Seismic Category I structures (88-753);
| |
| (5) Adds fuel oil sample taps to detect and remove accumulated moisture from diesel generator fuel oil
| |
| | |
| ;ia Attachment 'to TXX-89201
| |
| >May'.1, 1989
| |
| 'Page:252 of 439 FSAR Page: 4 3l
| |
| [ '(as amended)- Description r day' tanks-per Reg Guide 1.137 and ANSI N195 (88-706).
| |
| Group: 4.
| |
| Related SER'Section: 9.5.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.5-52 See Sheet No(s):01,02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Revises flow diagrams to show Y-strainers in lieu'of duplex strainers in fuel oil transfer pump discharge li nes .-
| |
| Justification:
| |
| (1)-See justification for 9 5.4.2.1L(89-051.1). ~
| |
| (2) Replaces differential pressure switches -- from 40-mesh strainer to:100-mesh strainer.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| -Figure 9.5-52 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor technical changes _to match as-built-conditions for the'D/G starting air and D/G fuel oil systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Miscellaneous minor. technical changes to match as-built conditions-including adding fuel. oil " grab samp'le" connection and; details-for drain traps on the D/G starting air compressors after coolers and air receiver condensate traps, deleting lock closed / lock open from various valves, revising notes and note numbers, and'
| |
| .~ correcting piping classes. The D/G barring device connection has been changed from station-air supply to, starting air system supply such that it can function properly based on the higher operating pressure.
| |
| Group: 3-Related SER Section: 9.5.4,6 SER/SSER Impact: No Figere 9.5-62
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Add chemical treatment and diesel generator details; !
| |
| delete unecessary instrument details. l Justification:
| |
| : 1. Instrument details deleted because these details do not belong to the piping flow diagram. Instrument tag nembers changed to conform to TV Electric standards,
| |
| : 2. This figure shows details regarding chemical treatment to the potable water before storing water in the Fire Protection Water Storage Tanks.
| |
| : 3. This figure describes design details of diesel engines, fuel oil tanks and accessories.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| = - - _ . . _ . _ - ____ __ -___-____ ____- ___________---___ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
| |
| | |
| Attach %nt ^
| |
| to TXX-89201 May l', 1989
| |
| 'Page'253 of:439-FSAR Page 0
| |
| -(as amended). Description Related SSER Section: SSER12 9.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.1-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| ~(Editorial)
| |
| Corrects list of-figures in summary description to reflect the-number of sheets in Figure 10.4-20.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| F' Corrects list of figures,in summary ' description to reflect the number of sheets in Figure 10.4-20.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: .10.1 SER/SSER Impact: No !
| |
| 10.3-21
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the reference regarding th. review and approval of secondary' chemistry implementing procedures.
| |
| D Justification:
| |
| The phrase "...and' approved by the Station Operations Review Committee" is being replaced by "...and approved as specified by the Technical' Specifications." The-Technical Specifications contain the applicable-requirements regarding review and approval of secondary.
| |
| chemistry implementing procedures. This change will eliminate unecessary future FSAR changes by referencing the-Technical Specifications.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.3-21, 22
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds statement indicating that secondary chemistry water quality will meet or exceed the specification of the NSSS vendor and EPRI guidelines.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies text by stating the manufacturer's and EPRI's guidelines are used in determining the values for the secondary cycle water chemistry parameters.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| :10.3-24
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Adds references to the end of the section to support text change (see page 10.3-21 #89-165.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds references to the end of the section to support text change (see page 10.3-21 #89-165.1)
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| | |
| g . . .
| |
| i;N O~
| |
| [
| |
| tAttachment tb'TXX-89201L iMay l', 1989-2Page 254'of'439 ls DFSAR Page L + Description (as amended)-.
| |
| ~ Table'10.3-10 See Sheet'No(s):01-l;
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| '(Correction) .
| |
| l Corrects and deletes some of the typical limits for the L secondary' cycle water chemistry (normal operation).,
| |
| 1 Justification:
| |
| : i. Revises typical limits so that the table will conform-L to the NSSS' vendor and EPRI guidelines which have been
| |
| 'added to the text (see page 10.3-21,#89-165.1'and page
| |
| .10.3-24,#89-165.2).
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.3-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor drawing changes add. otes and pipe line number break.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Drawing note references details of accumulators. Line designations are relocated in order to add pipe line number break for drain pot nitrogen supply line.
| |
| Group:'4 Related SER Section: 10.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.3-1 See Sheet'No(s):01-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Correction)
| |
| Add remote operators to main steam block valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Allows timely operation of block valves in adverse environment which may exist after SG Tube Rupture.
| |
| Operation of block valves is required to satisfactorily terminate the SG Tube Rupture scenario.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.3-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial) ,
| |
| Changes valve number for the blowoff valve for drain pot from 1MS-522 to IMS-622 due to drafting error.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes valve number for the blowoff valve for drain pot from 1MS-522 to IMS-622 due to drafting error.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| : p *
| |
| ,1
| |
| ? Attachment. .to TXX-89201-
| |
| ;1% i f1989-l
| |
| +- 155 of $39 FSAR Page
| |
| .-(as amended)' Description Figure.10.3-1 SeeSheetNo(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) ..
| |
| Deletes the pipeline designations.and changes the associate:1 piping category breaks.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This change eliminates the local stress failures at point of attachments. S/80 pipe fittings will provide.
| |
| acceptable stress distribution. '
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.3-1 .See Sheet No(s):01, 02, 03, 04, and 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes: tag numbers, reflects as-built details, shows vent path for hydro test, monitors for-LP Turbine steam and shows additi.onal drainage path.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes tag numbers, reflects as-built details, shows-vent path for hydro test,~ monitors for LP Turbine ~ steam and shows additional dr.ainage path.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER-Section: 10.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.3-1 See Sheet No(s):01, 03, and 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes reflect as-built conditions and correct drafting errors, Justification:
| |
| Includes correcting valve and line numbers and pipe >
| |
| breaks. Adds reducers and hand switches to reflect as-built configuration. ;
| |
| Group: 4 '
| |
| Related SER Section: 10.3.0 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.3-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletes duplicate information regarding instruments.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes instruments PS-2111A & B, and PS-2112A & B as they are duplicate and shown on other referenced drawings.
| |
| Group:'3 Related SER Section: 10.3.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No l
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| p3-k$ .
| |
| o Attachmen. t . to TXX-89201
| |
| ,May.1,-1989~
| |
| [ Page 256 of 439 M ~'
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) . Description i*
| |
| !: Figure 10.3 .See Sheet No(s):02, 03, and 04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction).
| |
| l -Install steam traps'and change fail-safe. position of-some valves in main steam reheat and' steam dump systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Decreases the potential for non-isolable-leakage area in steam drain lines between the MSivs and the. Turbine l: Stop Valves.
| |
| R Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.3-1 SeeSheet'No(s):02,03,and04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor drawing changes reflect as-built-conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 'Shows actual tag numbers and location of piping connections.
| |
| ~
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.3.2
| |
| .SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 10.3-1 SeeSheetNo(s):02., 03, and 04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Correct drafting' errors.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Correct drafting' errors.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Clarifies the cooling water inleakage rate and the cation to anion ratio of the Condensate Cleanup System.
| |
| ( 10. 4.- l .1. 3 . 6 )
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The 6gpm inleakage rate is an estimate and states as such to allow flexibility of operation. A 3 to 1 cation to anion ratio is only one of three recommended ratios and operating conditions determine actual ratio.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Remove the description of a low level alarm for the auxiliary condenser. (10.4.1.2.5) '
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The auxiliary condensers drain to the main condenser by gravity. The low level of the auxiliary condenser hot ,
| |
| wells are not required to be monitored for proper l
| |
| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ o- _ . _u- . _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _
| |
| :. .. . .I if
| |
| ".[',
| |
| ~
| |
| 4 Attachment ' tc TXX-89201' May 1,-1989 .
| |
| ? Page 257:of'439 m
| |
| :FSAR.Page
| |
| '(as amended) Description operation of these condensers. . There is no existing.
| |
| instrumentation for an auxiliary condenser low level alarm.
| |
| Group: 2 i
| |
| Related SER Section: 10.4.1 SER/SSER' Impact: No 10.4-13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects statement describing how excess condensation from the condenser exhausting vacuum pump seals is disposed of. (10.4.2.2.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Condenser. vacuum pump seal water drains to the' turbine b1dg floor drains and eventually to the liquid waste processing systam,'not to the atmospheric drain tank which returns'to the main condenser shell B hotwell.
| |
| This change reflects the as-built design.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| -Related SER Section: 10.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies the seal steam flow rate to the feedwater pump turbine by changing the adjective " design" to .
| |
| " normal"..(Section 10.5.3.1.2)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| " Design flow rate" gives'the connotation of being the maximum or. greatest expected system flow rate.
| |
| ' Changing the sentence to read " normal flow rate" provided a more appropriate description of the steam usage to the feedwater pump turbine.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| :10.4-33
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| -Changes the 3hrase "not corrosive" to " corrosive" with regards to t1e anticipated water quality of the Squaw Creek Reservoir. (10.4.5.2)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| A sentence in FSAR Section 9.2.1.2.1, Station Service Water System, correctly states the water quality is corrosive. This change revises Section 10.4.5.2 to agree with 9.2.1.2.1.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section:'10.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| p Attachment'. to TXX-89201 May 1,-1989
| |
| .~Page 253 ofc439.
| |
| FSAR Page jasamended)- . Description 10.4-35, 36'
| |
| ~
| |
| See Page No(s):37, 38 i
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| L Removes reference to gas chlorination system and re-I' places it.with a sodium hypochlorite' and sodium bromide addition system for the circulating and service water systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The gas chlorine detectors are removed from the control room air! intakes, and reference to the gas chlorination-system is replaced.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.5;. SSER04 10.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises the effluent water impurity _ levels for the Condensate Cleanup-System. (10.4.6.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The previous substances and concentrations li.sted in FSAR-10.4.6.1.(2) did not meet current'NSSS vendor and EPRI guidelines (added as references 26 & 27) for secondary steam generator feedwater chemistry. -The new list meets the specification of the NSSS vendor and EPRI guidelines.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.6' SER/SSER impact: No 10.4-46
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes the reference to a specific model of a cation conductivity analyzer.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The CH16A Type Larson Lane anlyzer is not the analyzer that chemistry will use exclusively. Therefore the reference to a specific model should be deleted.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.6 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 10.4-52
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) i Changes the capability to isolate feedwater heaters. !
| |
| (10.4.7.2.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Current FSAR incorrectly states that the individual feedwater heaters are removed fonn service. Only specific pairs of heaters are removed from service.
| |
| This change reflects as-built design of the condensate and feedwater systems.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| m . -
| |
| i T' Attachment -to TXX-89201 LMay 1, 1989 Page 259lof 439 J,
| |
| 'FSAR Page (as amended) Description 10.4-53
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes low-pressure theheater percent full flow bypass lineoffrom the98 emergency to'96 (Section 10.4.7.2.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The old value (98) does not reflect the condensate system design' requirements. The condensate pump design supplies 96% of the feedwater flow when the emergency feedwater heater bypass opens and the heater pumps~
| |
| trip. -This' scenario usually occurs at 40% steam dump.
| |
| Group: 2 . .
| |
| .Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-53
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes the flow feedwater pumps rate from 40gpmfor the auxiliary to 150 gpm. (boiler 10.4.7.2.1)
| |
| L Justification:
| |
| A design modification is changing the.' existing auxiliary boiler which will require an additional feed pump capacity.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.7-SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-53
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes the emergency low-pressure heater bypass ~ valve opening time from 2 seconds to 2.5 seconds.(10.4.7.2.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| An accceptance test demonstrates that the low pressure feedwater heater bypass valve opens in 2.5 seconds not 2.0 seconds as originally specified by the vendor.
| |
| i Subsequently, a review by the vendor states that L no safety analyses are impacted by the valve requiring more than two seconds to open and that an opening time of 2.5 seconds is acceptable.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| '10.4-54
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes the duplicate discussion of feedwater heater isolation. (10.4.7.2.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes discussion of feedwater heater isolation as this subject is addressed earlier within FSAR section ,
| |
| 10.4.7.2.1. For additional information see justification for page 10.4-52 (89-227.1)
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/5SER Impact: No L - _ - - _ _ _ . - _ _ _ - - -
| |
| | |
| ., l
| |
| 'Attachmerit to TXX-89201- ;
| |
| (May' ,1,1 1989- ;
| |
| Page 260 of 439: l o
| |
| TSAR Page:-
| |
| (as= amended) Description 10.4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes the text to correct inconsistencies-between the' FSAR and system' designs.and to ciarify system
| |
| . descriptions. (10.4.7.2)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| t Clarifies the approximate volume of water remaining in the condensate storage tank for emergency use by the AFW System (282,000 gal). ' The revi_ sed text clearly states what amount of the remaining volume is not-considered available-for use by AFW system (12,000 gal)'.
| |
| Therefore the design basis for the minimum st.orage capacity is 282,000 minus'12,000 or 270,000.;Even-though the 270,000.is still the correct value for.the minimum' storage capacity, the number _is being ' deleted to eliminate possible confussion. The paragraph below items (a) and (b) is not needed es a result of the clarification made above. The' minimum capacity required is less than the minimum storage capacity (270,000). Tne specific value for minimum capacity- :!
| |
| required is too detailed and is-being. deleted from~the= l FSAR. Previous items (a) and (b) are combined to form the new item (a). The new items (a) and (b) are consistent with the design basis contained in~FSAR section 10.4.9.1.
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| -Related SER Section: 10.4.9.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes !
| |
| SER p. 10-15, 2nd para indicated, "The technical speci- l fications require a minimum of 276,000 gallons of water to be reserved in the condensate storage' tank." The ;
| |
| T.S., FSAR App 5A.II.1, 9.2.6.1, & 9.2.6.2 will be corrected to eliminate.any inconsistencies. ,
| |
| i 10.4-57
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes discussion of sample system connections from the description of the feedwater system. (10.4.7.2)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| FSAR Section 10.4.16, Secondary Plant Sampling System, I discusses feedwater samples. Discussion of the sample points in other sectiorn is redundant and therefore deleted. This also applies to Condensate, Main Steam, and Heater drains references.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-63
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes the condensate pump recirculation valve from modulating to an on-off valve. (10.4.7.5)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| A cavitation problem was occuring at the condensate pump recirculation valve. A design modification has
| |
| | |
| ' Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 .!
| |
| n.
| |
| lPage 261 of 439 d
| |
| FSAR Page (asamended)- Description changed _the existing recirculation piping and valve internals to prevent cavitation. The valve logic was also modified to work in conjunction with the new design.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.7~
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-70
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| ' Adds a chemistry transient condition as an anticipated operational occurrence for the use of the demineralizers in the steam generator blowdown system.
| |
| (10.4.8.1.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| ~ Clarifies that the demineralizers will also'be used for transient chemistry conditions and provides an-example.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4.8 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-71, 72 See Page No(s):73
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects the anticipated water chemistry parameters for various conditions in the steam generator blowdown sys.
| |
| (10.4.8.1.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises parameters to meet the NSSS vendor (Westinghouse Guidelines for Secondary Water Chemistry i SGT-5.1.1-4468 dated February 1985) and EPR1 guidelines (EPRI PWR Secondary Water Chem Giudelines,Rev2, Nov 88)
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.8 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-73
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Removes the phrase " Required Effluent Quality" located ,
| |
| below the subtitle (item #3) " Processed Steam Generator Blowdown." (10.4.8.1.1(3)) '
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Subtitles 1 and 2 do not contain this descriptive phrase, therefore, removal of the phrase provides consistency. The preface to items 1, 2 & 3 states.that these parameters are anticipated water chemistry parameters at various conditions.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.8 SER/SSER 1mp6ct: No f
| |
| | |
| i.
| |
| f, Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989
| |
| .Page 262 of 439 l
| |
| l 1 l FSAR Page l I
| |
| (as amended) Description i 10.4-75
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Increases the allowable pressure drop (from 12 to 25 psi) across a demineralized filter before the filter is removed from service (10.4.8.2.1.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The previous value of 12 psi is for the pressure drop across a clean filter whereas the 25 psi pressure drop y is for a used or spent filter.
| |
| ! Group: 4 l Related SER Section: 10.4.8 I SER/SSER Impact: No 10.f-7b
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| ' Editorial)
| |
| Corrects the flow transmitter number from "FE-5221" to "FT-5221" (10.4.8.2.1.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the flow transmitter number from "FE-5221" to "FT-5221" Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.8 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-77
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds a chemistry transient condition as an anticipated oprational occurrence for the use of the demineralizers in the SGBS.(10.4.8.2.1(2))
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See justification for page 10.4-70 (#89-167.1).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4.8 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-81, 83
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Revises the text to correct inconsistencies between the FSAR and the AFW system design. (10.4.9.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The design states that the AFW system will be used in lieu of the main feedwater during hot shutdown, cooldown, and start-up operation. Recirculation of the CST is included as one of the functions of the non-essential pump and lines.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.9.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-84
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes the text to correct inconsistencies between the FSAR and system design and to clarify system description. (10.4.9.2)
| |
| Justificatica:
| |
| See justification for page 10.4-54. (#89-282.1)
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| | |
| m , , ,
| |
| y 7 'i. - 4, Attachment Jto TXX-89201 May 1,'1989 . .
| |
| , _Page 263 of 439
| |
| ,FSAR Page (as amended) Description Related SER Section: 10.4.9.1
| |
| ~SER/SSER-Impact: No' i
| |
| '10.4-84
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| ~(Correction) _ _
| |
| Changes text discussion on the interfaces between the' AFW system and the SWS. (10.4.9.2) u Justification:
| |
| Clarifies text by giving additional assurance'as to how system design provides adequate isolation of the SWS from the AFW system.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4.9.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| '10.4-85 Descriptio?: (Correction)
| |
| Clarifits the type of isolation valves which are located on the line connecting-the AFW pumps to_the steam gerarators. (10.4.9.2)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| There are ne motor operated and two manual _ isolation.
| |
| valves. it.ls change reflects system design.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.9.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| '10.4 -Description: (Correction)
| |
| Provides clarification of auxiliary feedwater system >
| |
| flow requirements after a loss of main feedwater, i (10.4.9.2) .]
| |
| Justification: ]
| |
| The two motor driven pumps or the turbine driven pump 1 (alone) or any combination are required to meet the vendors flow requirements for this condition (II). It ;
| |
| should be noted that this vendor requirement is more i stringent and conservative than that of condition (IV) events such as feedline rupture. 'l Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4.9 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-87
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Revises the turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump control panel from safety related (seismic) to non-safety related (non-seismic). 10.4.9.2 Justi fication:
| |
| An evaluation under 10 CFR 50.55(e) (Significant Deficiency Analysis Report 88-25, Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Turbine Control Pane)) has determined that the AFW L pump turbine local control panel components are not ,
| |
| h required for emergency operations and do not perform a i safety function. However, failure of these panel I components could prevent the AFW pump turbine from
| |
| | |
| ' Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| .May_.1, 1989 . -
| |
| ePage'264 of 439-
| |
| 'FSAR Page (asamended) Descripti_on performing its safety function by causing a. turbine
| |
| ' trip. In lieu of fully qualifying the; panel, the. ,
| |
| control panel components will be automatically isolated ~
| |
| I' when the AFW turbine driven pump-is required to auto start. This isolation only takes place upon receipt of a Safety injection isolation signal.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.9.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes n 'SER 10.4.9.1, page 10-14,' states in part "In addition, local manual control (of the AFWS pumps) is available:
| |
| to the operator." This statement shou _1d be clarified to state:that local manual control is not available upon receipt of a safety injection signal.
| |
| 10.4-88
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes the phrase which states that.the power supply l for the turbine speed setting signal is tripped on a.
| |
| safety injection signal. (10.4.9.3)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| As a result of a design modification, the phrase "and is tripped on a safety injection signal" was inserted by FSAR Amend 51. The design modification has been- !
| |
| cancelled, therefore these words are being deleted. '
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.9 SER/SSER Impact: 'No 10.4-92
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes text-to reflect that the Auxiliary.
| |
| Feedwater Turbine local control panel is non-seismic and non-1E, thus changing the previous commitment to qualify the panel. (10.4.9.5 (2)) !
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See justification on page 10.4-87 (#89-283.2). 1 Group: 2 !
| |
| Related SER Section: 10.4.9.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes See discussion of SER impact on page 10.4-87 ;
| |
| (#89.283.2) 10.4-102
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes the duplicate discussion of feedwater heater isolation. (10.4.11.2.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes discussion of feedwater heater isolation as this subject is addressed earlier within FSAR section 10.4.7.2.1. For additional information see justification for page 10.4-52 (89-227.1)
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER 1mpact: No l
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| y , - - - - - - - - -
| |
| k-l' Reattachment to TXX-89201:
| |
| , 2May I' -1989
| |
| [ JPage'265 of 439-l t w l'- FSAR Page1
| |
| -(as amended). Description l- ,
| |
| j 9"
| |
| ~
| |
| 10'.4-103
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Deletes reference to number of sheets to eliminate-unnecessary future FSAR changes. (10.4.11.2.1)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes reference to number of sheets to eliminate unnecessary future FSAR changes.
| |
| y Group: 4
| |
| % 'Related SER Section: 10.4.0 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.'4-105, 106
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| '(Correction)
| |
| -Corrects description of the instrument and controls in in the Heater Drains System Section. (10.4.11.5)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The changes are made to accurately. represent original plant conditions and to reflect modifications to the
| |
| .. system design. Changes include clarification of the number and type of-level transmitter / controls used for-the MSR drain tanks'and the arrangement of alarms and switches for heaters.
| |
| Group:'2 y
| |
| Related SER Section: 10.4.0 !
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No -!
| |
| 10.'4-111, 112
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) .
| |
| a Changes the-text describing the Auxiliary Steam !
| |
| System to reflect the replacement of the existing '
| |
| . electrode type boiler with a fuel oil type boiler. 4 (10.4.13)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| i The exi'. ting electrode type boiler cannot be utilized based on chemistry carryover and capacity concerns. A fuel oil type boiler is being installed to support plant startup. This change adds the new auxiliary boiler and supporting equipment into the auxiliary steam system section of the FSAR. Old water quality requirements-revised. Unnecessary references to figure sheets deleted.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.0 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-114,' 115
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Changes the text for the Auxiliary Steam System to reflect the replacement of the existing electrode type boiler with a fuel oil type boiler. 7 (10.4.13)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See justification for page 10.4-111 (#89-125.1)
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.0
| |
| | |
| I Attachment to TXX-89201 1 May. I', 1989. .
| |
| iPage-266 of-439-p FSAR Page L
| |
| (as amended) Descrip' tion ~
| |
| 1 SER/SSER Impact: No. i 10.4-116, 117
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Changes the text for the Auxiliary Steam f
| |
| : System to reflect the replacement.of the existing I electrode type boiler with a fuel oil type boiler. I (10.4.13)
| |
| L Justification:
| |
| See justification for page.10.4-111 (#89-125.1)-
| |
| , Groupi 2-Related SER Section: 10.4.0
| |
| :SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-118, 119
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Modifies the existing turbine lube oil purification system (section 10.4.14.1 thru .2).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| A design modification has been issued to replace th~e i
| |
| existing mechanical filtration system with a centri- I fugal separation system. The FSAR is being changed to reflect actual: design.
| |
| Group: 2 ,
| |
| 'Related SER Section: 10.4 i SER/SSER Impact: No.
| |
| '10.4-120, 121
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Ccrrection)
| |
| Modifies the existing turbine lube oil purification ;
| |
| system.(section 10.4.14.2 thru .5). ,
| |
| l Justification: '
| |
| See justification for page 10.4-118 (# 88-508.1)
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-122
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Modifies the existing turbine lube oil purification system (section 10.4.14.5).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See justification for page 10.4-118 (# 88-508.1).
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| '10.4-132 133
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Updates and expands discussion of sample points and location of sample stations. Clarifies that the secondary plant sampling system includes the routing of signals. (10.4.16, 10.4.16.1)
| |
| Justification: ,
| |
| This change revises the discussion to reflect changes !
| |
| in the plant resulting from design modifications.
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| | |
| Q-Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| -May 1, 1989
| |
| ; .Page 267 of'439 r
| |
| l ..
| |
| , FSAR Page (as-amended), Description Related SER Section: 10.4.0 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ;f 10.4-133, 134
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects sample detailed design conditioning information (methodology,.
| |
| temperature deletes and pressure) and expands sample station information. (10.4.16.2)
| |
| Justification: l Not all samples are cooled and depressurized'e.g., CST, Atmospheric Drain Tank, etc. Provides consistency with in the system description by deleting-detailed design
| |
| + values. Add sample station information to relfect.
| |
| -plant conditions. 1 Group: 2 i
| |
| Related SER Section: 10.4.0 i SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| : 9. 'o 10.4-134
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects equipment terminology, updates control s_ignal sources, and deletes detailed design'information. i 4
| |
| -(10.4.16.2)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes profide as-built information as a result of design modifications. Provides consistency ~within'the--
| |
| system description by deleting detailed design information.
| |
| Group: 2 u Related SER Section: 10.4.0 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-135
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies which control board contains the common trouble alarm. (10.4.16.5)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies that the common trouble alarm is located on the main control board.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.0 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-138
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Adds references for NSSS vendor and EPRI guidelines to support text changes in Section 10.4.6.1 Justification:
| |
| Adds references for NSSS vendor and EPRI guidelines to support text changes in Section 10.4.6.1.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.6 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| r
| |
| : i. .) , a? ,
| |
| " Attachment" 'to:TXX-89201
| |
| .'May 1,:1989
| |
| { !Page;268 of 439- ,
| |
| FSAR Page .
| |
| (as amended) Description Table:10.4 See Sheet No(s):03 and 04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)'
| |
| Revises the particle retention design criteria for
| |
| : inlet filters and the spent resin sluice pump filters of the steam generator blowdown system.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The new particle retention design criteria reflect Westinghouse and EPRI guidelines.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.8 Ee SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| . Table'10.4-6 See Sheet No(s):04 and 07
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| -Revises design pressure drop of SGBS spent resin sluice pump filter (from 12 to 5 psi), material (from AISI 304 L
| |
| to AISI 316 stainless steel), motor horsepower (from 30 L to 20)'and motor speed (from 3600 to 3450 rpm) of the !
| |
| SGBS Spent Resin sluice pump.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The equipment design criteria values did not' reflect plant conditions.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.8 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s):01, 02, and 03 ,
| |
| Description': (Correction)' .
| |
| Changes the table to correct inconsistencies between the FSAR and system design. I Justification:
| |
| Corrects the equipment design parameter for the motor driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump, the turbine-driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump, and the Condensate Storage Tank to match system design.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.9.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes See SER impact for page 10.4-53. (#89-282.1)
| |
| Table 10.4-9 See Sheet No(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Corrects failure mode analyses to reflect current design requirements for pump recirculation control of AFW system (break on feedwater pipe to steam generator No. 4 - inside containment and single failure).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects failure mode analysis to reflect current design requirements for a break on feedwater pipe to steam generator No. 4 (inside containment and single failure) by revising the pump recirculation control to account for the provision of accumulators to permit t
| |
| | |
| ' Attachments to'.TXX-89201 MayL1, 1989 P Page 269-of.439 p
| |
| FSAR Psge.
| |
| ({asamended)- Description automatic control for a 30 minute period after.which.an operator controls recirculation manually.
| |
| Group:~3 Related SER Section: 10.4.9' !
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Table:10.4-13 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| - Desc ription: (Revision)
| |
| ' Changes the table for the Auxiliary Steam System.to reflect the replacement of the existing electrode type boiler with a fuel oil type. boiler.
| |
| ' Justification:
| |
| See justification for page 10.4-111 (#89-125.1)
| |
| Group: 2 Related'SER Section:.10.4.0 SER/SSER< Impact: No
| |
| . Table 10.4-14 :See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| , . Changes the table for the Auxiliary Steam .
| |
| System to reflect the replacement of the existing electrode type boiler with a fuel oil type boiler.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See justification for page.10.4-111 (#89-125.1)
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.0-SER/SSER Impact: No Table 10.4-15 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) .
| |
| Changes the table for the Auxiliary Steam System to reflect the replacement of the existina
| |
| , electrode type boiler with a fuel oil type boiler. ;
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See justification for page 10.4-111 (#89-125.1)
| |
| Group: 2 '
| |
| Related SER.Secticn: 10.4.0 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 10.4 16 See Sheet No(s):02 ,
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) 1 Modifications to the Boron Recycle Evaporator based on .
| |
| . recommendations in the Radwaste Management Study !
| |
| eliminate potential operational, maintenance, and ALARA' concerns.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Supply Nitrogen to the Boron Recycle System Evaporator Condenser to provide additional NPSH for concentrator pump during pump-out.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Li_o_________._____._._____...__n._
| |
| | |
| '+ ,,
| |
| ,u
| |
| ' ~
| |
| sAttachment . totTXX-89201' w 'May;l',.1989 Page 270 of 439.
| |
| o ,
| |
| ' FSAR Page .
| |
| f(as amended). Description Table 10.4-18 See Sheet.No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) . . .
| |
| Corrects table to match current design information.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds _ and deletes . sample source. information to reflect '
| |
| current design.
| |
| Group: 2.
| |
| Related SER Section: 10.4.0 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 10.4'-19' See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| ' Corrects equipment design information and provides information previously' designated as "later".
| |
| (10.4.7.2)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes the number of Hot Well sample pumps from four
| |
| .to two, reflecting as-built. conditions. Adds ;esign
| |
| ' flow and design TOH for the hotwe!' same'e pumps.which were designated as "later".
| |
| ' Group: 2 Related SER Section:~10.4.0 SER/SSER Impact: No r . Table 10.4 See Sheet No(s):01, 02, 03, and 04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Correction)
| |
| Revises the secondary plant sampling system measured parameters. ;
| |
| Justification:
| |
| r Provides corrections'to the. sample source, measured-parameter, receiver and function,'and range to match the as-built plant. '
| |
| Group:-2 Related SER Section: 10.4.0 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-3 See Sheet.No(s):01 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Add level guage and larger piping at the vacuum priming o tank.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Modifications improve response time of valve 1-LV-2950 and reduce carry over of circulating water to the condenser vacuum pumps.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| - = _ _ _ _ _
| |
| | |
| i o
| |
| l- % Attachment 1 to TXX-89201'. l L 1 May 1, 1989 .l L LPage 271' of' 439 '
| |
| FSAR Page l
| |
| L -(as amended)' Description
| |
| ' Figure.10.4-3 .See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)-
| |
| Relocates the line numbers and adds vendor supplied r; valve for a radiation monitor.
| |
| L Justification:
| |
| l Revises the figure to reflects the as-built condition by relocating the line numbers and adds vendor supplied valve for the radiation monitor 2959.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-3 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02 Descri'ption: (Correction)-
| |
| Minor piping changes were made to the vent piping off the auxiliary condensers and other minor changes were incorporated into the drawings.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Minor piping changes were made to the vent piping off the auxiliary condensers and other minor changes were incorporated into the-drawings.
| |
| '~
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-3 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Add hand switches to seal water pumps.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Allows continuous operation of seal water pumps which reduces potential for concponent corrosion.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes reflect as-built conditions and correct drafting errors.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes include correct depiction of piping interface, instrumentation, and line' numbers.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Incorporate information regarding turbine generator support systems into FSAR flow diagram from vendor drawings, Justification:
| |
| Consolidates information and decreases reliance on vendor drawings. I
| |
| -___ _____=___:___-_____
| |
| | |
| - )k q
| |
| FAttachment- to.TXX-89201 7, < : May 1, .1989
| |
| 'Page.272 of.439 1
| |
| ')
| |
| 1 FSAR Page
| |
| .(as amended) Description i
| |
| Group: 4'.,
| |
| Related SER Section: 10.4.3
| |
| , SER/SSER' Impact: No ;
| |
| ' Figure 10.4-4 SeeSheetNo(s):01and02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes locked open criteria from gland steam; condenser drain valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Engineering report ER-ME-015 provides criteria for locked position valves and 1GS-145 & 148 are not required to be locked.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-5 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Relocate intersection and sample line of the waste-water management system to reflect as-built piping.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Relocate intersection and sample line of the waste water managment system to reflect'as-built piping.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-5. See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes reflect as-built condition.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Includes adding tag numbers and correcting pipe configuration.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-5 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) l Add sample valve to Circulating Water System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Improves ability to collect accurate water samples.
| |
| Group: 3 '
| |
| Related SER Section: 10.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-5 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor changes reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Brings documents into conformance with each other and
| |
| | |
| h
| |
| . Attachment' .to TXX-89201 May 1,1 1989 )
| |
| Page 273'of 439 1 It 1 '.
| |
| L: .FSAR Page 'I (as amended) Description L accurately reflects as-built conditions. )
| |
| Group: 4- .j Related SER Section: 10.4.5 l SER/SSER Impact: No !
| |
| Figure 10.4-5,.6: .See Sheet No(s):05'(Sh. I', 2, 3, and 4)
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Incorporates minor changes:into the print-ready drawing
| |
| ' Justification:
| |
| r Changes include--detail of level gauge piping, diagram arrangement, corrects piping material for primary and~
| |
| level sensing lines, correct / add tag numbers, removes seal water injection lines from the lube water pumps.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure.10.4-5, 6 See' Sheet No(s):05 (Sh. 3)'
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Removes reference to' gas' chlorination system and re-places it with a' sodium hypochlorite and sodium bromide addition system for the circulating and service water systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The gas chlorine detectors are removed from the control-room air intakes, and reference to the gas chlorination-system is replaced.
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| , Related SER Section: 10.4.5; SSER04 10.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-7' See Sheet No(s):01.and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Changes the figure to be consistent with the as-built design and layout.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies and modifies the existing figure into j three sheets to be consistent with-the as-built '
| |
| design and layout. Adds all vessels, replaces pressure indicating controllers and associated piping, and various misc. changes. Expanded the CCS interface with Condensate system, Waste Management system and Vents & Drains system.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.6 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-7 See Sheet No(s):01, 02, 03, 04 and 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| The 2-sheet drawing was reorganized and split into five sheets. 1 Justification:
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 274 of 439 l
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description ;
| |
| The 2-sheet drawing was reorganized and split into five sheets. Additional minor corrections were made as the print-ready was prepared.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.6 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 10.4-7 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes the handswitch labels and adds the tag numbers for Spent Powdex Pumps.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes the handswitch labels and adds the tag numbers for Spent Powdex Pumps to match as-built plant.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10. 4. fi SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correctior.)
| |
| Change drawings to shov check valves installed to prevent overpressurization of Aux Feedwater Sys due to Condensate Sys leakag2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Should Valve 1C0-195 leak or be left open, it could cause AFW to overpressurize. A check valve downstream and pressure relief valve upstream of the isolation
| |
| , valve prevents overpressurization.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds feedater piping to, and steam supply piping from the new Auxiliary Boiler.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Chemistry carryover concerns necessitated installation of a new Aux Boiler. This change reflects associated new piping.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Add a check valve to the Condensate System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Overpressure protection must be provided for the Auxiliary Feedwater System due to leakage from the Condensate System.
| |
| Group: 3 i
| |
| i
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201' May 1, 1989 Page 275 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s):C'
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes the type of Auxiliary Steam System boiler used from electrode to fuel oil.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See justification for page 10.4-111 (#89-125.1)
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes correct draf ting errors and reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Includes errors due to the CAD conversion, tag numbers added for clarity, corrects valve and line numbers, and changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s):01, 02, and 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor drawing changes reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects vent valve connections, thermowell locations, line and tag numbers. Shows interface with condensate system to provide cooling water for the sampling coolers.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes reflect as-built condition.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Includes adding tag numbers and correcting pipe configuration.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.6 SER/SSER Impact: No l
| |
| | |
| -y a LAttachment.. to TXX-89201 n May 1,-1989- ,
| |
| c, ;Page 276 of 439 ,
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description '
| |
| p Figure 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Changes valve status.
| |
| Justification: _
| |
| -1
| |
| . Locks;open Valve 1C0-239 to prevent damage o'r possible pipe rupture.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| .. Related SER Section: 10.4.7 E
| |
| SER/SSER. Impact: No
| |
| ;. , : Figure 10.4-9 .See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| ! Add vendor supplied instrumentation and valves to L the Steam Generator Feedwater System flow diagram.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Installed vendor supplied equipment is required to be operated by procedure and should have appropriate identification. A Design Change Authorization was issued to add this equipment.to the flow diagram.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-9 SeeSheetNo(s):01_
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Changes valve status, adds flushing and bypass capability and recirculation discharge piping and spargers for FW Pumps. Provides warm up orifice for the main feed pump. Provides flushing discharge line, valve and orifice to main condenser.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Locks open Valve 100-239 to prevent damage or possible pipe rupture. Provides full flow flushing of condensate /feedwater system with bypass arrangement and valve at FW Pump 1-A & 1-B. Provides full flow flushing discharge line and discharge valve 1-HV-2150 and restriction orifice'to main condenser. Provides FW pumps 1-A and 1-B recirculation discharge piping.and spargers at condenser shell 1-A. Adds main feedpump g warm up orifice to allow the pump to be brought to i
| |
| normal operating temperature prior to being placed in service.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SS M Impact: No I Figure 10.4-9 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor drawing changes show interface between Main Feedwater Systems and related systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds line numbers and designation.
| |
| | |
| Attachinent to TXX-89201' May.1, 1989 r > .Page:277 of 439 FSAR Page .
| |
| (as' amended) . Description Group: 4-Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No L-Figure 10.4-9l See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Add equipment ID numbers to clarify feedwater. flow
| |
| ~
| |
| elements.
| |
| L Justification:
| |
| Provies additional information for clarity.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| . Related SER Section: 10.4.7 L
| |
| SER/SSER! Impact: No Figure 10.4-9 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor drawing change reflects replacement of
| |
| , thermocouple with RTDs and adds clarifying note. 1 Justification:
| |
| Instrumentation and controls modification changed the instrumentation and clarifies that certain thermowells are provided with threade'd plugs.
| |
| Group: 4 ,
| |
| Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-9 SeeSheetNo(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Add inspection port for each feedwater flow venturi meter.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Add inspection port for each feedwater flow venturi meter.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-9 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises the number of sample connections to the steam generators.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises drawing of the steam generator sampling system to delete the sample connections to steam generators 3 and 4. They were determined to be unnecessary and the sample lines were capped.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page'278 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Figure 10.4-9 See Sheet No(s):02 and 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds the line sizes, line numbers, and test connection to Steam Generator Feedwater System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the figure to reflect the as-built condition and add the line sizes, line numbers, and test connection to Steam Generator Feedwater System.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-9 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Relocate pressure elements and install isolation and vent valves in Feedwater System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| New arrangement conforms to ASME III requirements.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-10 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor changes are inc'orporated into the print-ready drawings to correct drafting errors.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Minor changes are incorporated into the print-ready drawings to correct drafting errors.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.8 SER/SSER Impact: No i Figure 10.4-10 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial) 1 Justification:
| |
| Corrects line number, tag number, and continuation tag.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.8 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 10.4-11 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds additional air accumulators to operate the auxiliary feedwater flow control and recirculation valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Additional air capacity is required to operate the auxiliary feedwater flow control and recirculation I valves.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4.9
| |
| | |
| ( ,
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| ~May:1, 1989.
| |
| Page 279 of 439
| |
| 'FSAR Page .
| |
| L(as amended) Description-SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-11 See.SheetNo(s):01,:02,and03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Correction) l r- Minor corrections show line numbers, weld classes, and. I anti-siphoning connections.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes reflect as-built conditions and bring drawings ~
| |
| into agreement, i
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| .Related SER Section: 10.4.9' SER/SSER Impact: No Figure'10.4-11 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Corrects drafting. error.
| |
| . Justification:
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER'Section: 10.4.9 SER/SSER. Impact: No Figure 10.4-11 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Change pipe class below Auxiliary Feedwater Pump vent lines, and reducing inserts are added in casing vents.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change pipe class below Auxiliary'Feedwater Pump vent .)
| |
| lines, and reducing inserts are added in casing vents. '
| |
| . Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.9 SER/SSER. Impact: No Figure 10.4-11 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Relocates pipe class designations for the auxiliary feedwater system.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provides consistency with the as-built piping isometrics drawings.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.9 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-11 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes CST level instrumentation to vent to Nitrogen Blanket Supply Sys rather than atmosphere.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provides accurate level indication by compensating for Nitrogen Blanket pressure.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4
| |
| | |
| a Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| !L May 1, 1989
| |
| -Page 280 of 439 FSAR Page I (as amended) Description )
| |
| 1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-11 See Sheet No(s):03 !
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) i Change drawings to show check valves installed to ;
| |
| prevent overpressurization of Aux Feedwater Sys due to 1 Condensate Sys leakage.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Should Valve 1C0-195 leak or be left open, it could <
| |
| cause AFW to overpressurize. A check valve downstream and pressure relief valve upstream of the isolation valve prevents overpressurization.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4.9 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-11 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Show as-built stainless steel to carbon steel break location on Auxiliary Feedwater Line.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Reflects as-built condition. Relocates line number due to new break location.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.9 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-11 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Add a relief valve to the Auxiliary Feedwater System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Overpressure protection must be provided for the Auxiliary Feedwater System due to leakage from the Condensate System.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4.9 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-11 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies flow path to Condensate System, class break locations and flange material. Corrects depiction of secondary sampling system to auxiliary feed line. Adds line numbers and corrects continuation block.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4.9 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| q J
| |
| E e - Attachment- to TXX-89201
| |
| .MayE1,f1989
| |
| . Page 281'of 439 q
| |
| FSAR Page lasamended) Description .J Figure 10.4-13' See Sheet''No(s):01 and 02-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| ; Mi'scellaneous minor changes correct drafting errors
| |
| , and reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification: .
| |
| i Includes corrections due to the CAD conversion. i Group: 4 y Related SER Section: 10.4.0 '
| |
| SER/SSER' Impact: No I F.igure 10.4-14 See'. Sheet No(s):01, 02, 03, 04,'and 05 Descrip ti'on : (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes correct drafting errors and reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Includes errors due to the CAD conversion, tag numbers
| |
| , added for clarity, corrects valve and line numbers, and-changes to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 4 Related'SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 10.4-14 See Sheet No(s):04 and 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds vendor supplied valves and piping to the heater.
| |
| drain systems.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provides as-built information.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: .No-Figure 10.4-14 See Sheet No(s):0'4 and 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction).
| |
| Corrects and adds the centerline elevations for the moisture seperator reheater unit 1 reheater drain tanks.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provides consistency with the as-built design.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-15 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect as-built conditions for Demineralized and Reactor Make-up Water System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects the way in which the DD to TW system break and specification break are shown.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| | |
| r Attachmont' to'TXX-89201 May- 1, .'1989 Page 282 of 439 FSAR Page
| |
| '(as amended) Description Related SER Section: 9.2.3 SER/SSER Impact:'No Figure 10.4-15 -See Sheet No(s):01 and 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes correct drafting errors and clarify line and tag numbers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects drafting errors.due to CAD conversion. Adds cross-reference and line numbers. Corrects tag numbersi Group: 4 y Related SER Section: 10.4.0 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| , i t
| |
| Figure 10.4-15 See Sheet No(s):02 and 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) . .
| |
| Incorporate turbine-generator support information from L vendor drawings and correct tag and line numbers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Consolidates information, reflects as-built conditions, and conforms to drawing standards.
| |
| Group: 3 ;
| |
| Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER. Impact: No Figure 10.4-15 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Add relief valve to turbine plant cooling water system.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provides overpressurization protection.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-15 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes line numbers for the Turbine Plant. Cooling Water System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| 3 Changes line numbers for the Turbine Plant Cooling Water System due to the duplication line numbering.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-16 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds feedwater piping to, and steam supply piping from the new Aux Boiler.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Chemistry carrover concerns necessitated installation of a new auxiliary Boiler. This change adds related
| |
| | |
| f
| |
| . s:-Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| ? .May11, 1989-Page-2834 of.439.
| |
| v FSA'R Page' .
| |
| (as amended) Description i~< ,,
| |
| piping.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER.1mpact: No Figure.10.4-16l See Sheet No(s):01, 02, 03,-and 04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Replace existing strainer, drain line_ and valve with-a steam trap in the condensate line leaving the evaporator. Add a new pressure control' valve (PCV) in a new bypass line around the existing PCV in the concen-
| |
| .. . trator heating steam line.
| |
| . Justification:
| |
| ~
| |
| Heating steam pressure cannot.be held within the. -i concentrator tube side without a-steam trap in the. '
| |
| L.
| |
| condensate line. Concentrator heating steam flow should not pass through the modulating main PCV during stand-by, cooldown, pumpout and shutdown.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER.Section: 10.4 SER/SSER impact: No.
| |
| Figure 10.4-16 See Sheet No(s):02 and 04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes the type of Auxiliary Steam System boiler used from electrode to fuel oil.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See justification for page 10.4-111 (#89-125.1)
| |
| Group: 4 Related.SER Section: 10.4.0 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 10.4-16 'SeeSheetNo(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor drawing changes to delete items which-are part of the radiation monitor skid and to add clarifying note.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The items deleted from this figure are all part of the radaition monitoring process skid X-RE-3230 and there-fore should not be displayed as' separate items. The l
| |
| '*' is added'to X-RE-3230 since it is supplied by the Radiation Monitor Supplier as per note 2 of the figure.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4 i SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-16 See Sheet No(s):03 i
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Modifications to the Boron Recycle Evaporator based on recommendations in the Radwaste Management Study eliminate potential operational, maintenance, and ALARA concerns.
| |
| | |
| L
| |
| , Attachment to.TXX-89201 l ~May 1,!1989:
| |
| ? 'Page 284 of 439:
| |
| y FSAR Page-
| |
| ~(asamended) ' Description Justification: . . .
| |
| Remove strainer in 3/4-SA-X-61-152-5. and add a steam trap in steam condensate line leaving feed preheater replacing existing strainer, drain line, and valve.
| |
| p Group:.3 Related SER Section:'10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-17 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor change adds'line and tag numbers and deletes tankL
| |
| . level limits from drawing.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Completes information by adding line and tag numbers and reflecting as-built conditions. Level limits for tank are too detailed for inclusion in this drawing.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-17 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Incorporate turbine-generator support information from vendor drawings and correct tag and line numbers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Consolidates inf.ormation, reflects as built conditions, and conforms to drawing standards.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER impact: No Figure 10.4-17 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Modifies the existing turbine lube oil purification system.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See justification for page 10.4-118 (# 88-508.1) and the changes as noted on pages 10.4-118 thru 10.4-122
| |
| (# 88-508.1, 2, & 3)
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-18 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes CST level instrumentation to vent to Nitrogen Blanket Supply Sys rather than Atmosphere.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provides accurate level indication by compensatt.g for the Nitrogen Blanket pressure.
| |
| Group: 3 .
| |
| Related SER Section: 10.4
| |
| | |
| e g
| |
| L' , , --
| |
| LAttachment. . to TXX-89201
| |
| : May 1, 1989' Page)285 of'439 FSAR'Page (asamended)- Description
| |
| .SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-18 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Modifications to the Boron Recycle Evaporator based on recommendations in the Radwaste Management Study eliminate potential operational, maintenance, and ALARA concerns.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| y Replace Aux Steam supply'to evaporator condenser with a nitrogen supply line and associated pressure control' valve. Add new check valve to prevent back flow into the nitrogen system. Add manual isolation. valve to allow isolation of nitrogen supply to boron recycle evaporator during maintenance. -Add a line from the q spent resin storage tank nitrogen supply to the boron recycle evaporator package. Nitrogen to evaporator condenser will be used to purge vent condenser prior to maintenance and to pressurize evaporator concentrator during pump out.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-18, 19 See Sheet No(s):18 (Sh. I and 2)
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Minor changes and corrected tag numbers on. print-ready drawings Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure'10.4-19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Corrects drafting errors.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-20
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Minor changes reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Shows system boundaries and interconnections.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No h _m___ .___-.m______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
| |
| | |
| ' Attachment; to TXX-89201' L May 1,L1989.
| |
| Page 286 of 439-k' ;FSAR Page
| |
| .(as amended) Description
| |
| ' Figure'10.~4-20 See Sheet No(s):01, 02, 03, and 04 '
| |
| Oescriptiun: -(Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The previous.one-sheet drawing is divided into four sheets. Drafting errors and other minor corrections are incorporated into the print-ready drawing.
| |
| .)
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No r
| |
| 11.1-1, 3 See Page No(s):06 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Revision) ..
| |
| Changes to reflect updated source.-terms and references.
| |
| <> Justification:
| |
| ; Revise text to reflect updated source terms and refer-ences used in the revised accident analyses and shield-ing design reviews. Changes references to a deleted table to the correct existing' table.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.1-1 See' Sheet No(s):01, 02 and 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision).
| |
| Changes to reflect updated source terms and references.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises table to reflect updated source terms and design data used for_ accident analyses and to be consistent with revised section 15.7.
| |
| Group: 3-Related SER Section: 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.1-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Changes to reflect updated source terms and. references.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes table. See Table 12.2-3.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table:11.125 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Changes to reflect updated source terms and references.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes a duplicate entry.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| a fAttachment ;to TXX-89201 !
| |
| tMay 1; 1989-
| |
| !~ Page 287 of 439-FSAR Page=
| |
| (as amended) Description
| |
| " Table 11'.1-6 '
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Changes to reflect updated source terms and references.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes table due to updated source terms used for.
| |
| accident analyses and to be consistent with re. vised section 15.7.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.1 L'
| |
| SER/SSER' Impact: No 11.2-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| E Provisions for use of portable, vendor-supplied Filter-Demineralized.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds description of portable,' vendor-supplied Filter-Demineralized System-that may be used for liquid radio-active waste processing. -Provisions for its use made per DCA 68761.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.2-14
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletes reference to ASME code and statement in text
| |
| 'for Equipment Description and Compon_ent Design of Liquid Waste Processing System regarding which materi-als are not used.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes to reflect compliance with'the code, code class, safety class and. seismic classification require-ments of ANSI /ANS-51.1-1983, Table A-1 for the Boron I Recycle System components and the code, code class, safety class and seismic classification requirements _of Reg. Guide 1.143 Rev. 1, Table 1 for the Liquid and Gaseous Waste Processing Systems' components.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| !~
| |
| 11.2-17.
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Addition of two new laundry holdup and monitor tank I pumps per DCA 80724.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes reflect two new pumps added to accomodate the capacity of a temporary, portable, vendor-supplied Fil-ter-Demineralized that will be used; the provisions for which were made under DCA 68761 (LDCR 88-570).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.2.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No f -
| |
| Mi- _ - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ _ - _ - - --
| |
| | |
| Attachment"_ to TXX-89201 i
| |
| 'May 1, 1989 .
| |
| Page-288 of.439"
| |
| :FSAR Page
| |
| .jasamended) Description 11.2-21.
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)-
| |
| Correction of name of radioactive waste tank'from
| |
| " Batch Tank" to " Waste Conditioning Tank."
| |
| Justification:
| |
| - Corrects table-drawing inconsistencies.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| -Table 11.2-3 See Sheet No(s):10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)- .
| |
| 3 Addition of two new laundry holdup and monitor tank i
| |
| o pumps per DCA 80724.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes reflect two new pumps'added to accomodate the capacity of a temporary, portable, vendor-suppl'ied Fil-ter-Demineralized that will be used; the provisions for.
| |
| -which were made under DCA 68761 (LDCR 88-570).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.2-4 See Sheet No(s):03 and 04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction of name of radioactive waste tank from
| |
| " Batch Tank" to " Waste Conditioning Tank."
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects table-drawing inconsistencies. Also editorial .
| |
| correction of quantity of laundry and hot shower tank !
| |
| to be one.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2.1.
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11'.2-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Change to Figure 11.2-2 to indicate a change in pipe classification and to correct the location of line numbers to match as-buiit drawings.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change required to correct a drafting error.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-2 '
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Adds a thermal relief valve.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change required to show a new component added to d provide adequate overpressure protection.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 ;
| |
| May 1, 1989 i Page 289 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Figure 11.2-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Change to Figure 11.2-2 to delete a valve that should not have been shown in the drawing for the Liquid Waste Processing Reactor Coolant Drain Tank l Subsystem.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change required to maintain consistency with the rest of the drawing.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Incorporates changes of LDCRs 88-258,688,815 and 896.
| |
| Reclassifies components per DEP-150 and Reg. Guide 1.143, and adds missing line numbers.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| Figure 11.2-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds missing line number for Reactor Coolant Drain Tank that was erroneously deleted in last revision.
| |
| Group: 3 :
| |
| Related SER Section: 11.2 i SER/5SER Impact: No Figure 11.2-3 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects locked closed status of valves.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The designation 'L.C.' is removed from certain valves because the valves were reclassified and no longer need to be locked closed.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-3 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction to Figure 11.2-3, sheet 1 to indicate the correct tie-in point of a vent line and to show the correct component numbers for a run of pipe and a resin fill-line isolation valve.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change required to correct a drafting error.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| "( LAttachment to TXX-89201 May.I',-1989.
| |
| h lPage 290 of 439 e
| |
| FSAR Page
| |
| {as amended) Description .
| |
| Figure 11.2-3 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| ..,. Revision to show existance of shield walls for waste holdup tank .
| |
| , Justification:
| |
| Correction to as-built.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ' Figure 11.2-3 'See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) .
| |
| Provisions for use of portable, vendor-supplied Filter-
| |
| . Demineralized.
| |
| Incorporated by LDCR 89-381.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes existing drawings to show components added per DCA 68761 to allow use of portable,. vendor-supplied Filter-Demineralized, Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 11.2-3 SeeSheet-No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarification to Figure 11.2-3 Sh.1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Addition to note 3 on sheet 1 to reference additional drawing for more information.
| |
| Group: 4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-3 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrections to Figure 11.2-3 Sh.1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects line number at outlet of waste evaporator feed pump and valve number at combined outlet of containment sump and RCDT (loc. B-1).
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ' Figure 11.2-3 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02 i
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Editorial change to Figure 11.2-3 to correct two li,e numbers and indicate two line numbers previously unmarked.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change is required to correct a drafting error.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2.1
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 ;
| |
| May l', 1989 i L Page.291 of 439.
| |
| :FSAR Page (as amended) Description SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-3 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revisicas to Figure 11.2-3, Shts. 1 & 2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Incorporates LDCRs 88-489, 515, 580, 814, 816, 465, and portions of LDCRs 88-570 and 941 for these figures, and corrects line numbers at inlet to waste monitor tank (loc. F,G-1 on sh. 1) and outlet of waste evap. feed pump, shows an existing strainer at waste cond. evap.
| |
| demineralized, reclassifies components per DEP-150 and Reg. Guide 1.143, shows vendor connections for Rad.
| |
| Waste Processing, and corrects CAD conversion error at resin fill line to waste evap. cond. demineralized to agree with as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-3 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) l Corrections to Figure 11.2-3 Shts. 1 & 2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes unnecessary note reference at waste evap.cond.
| |
| tank, corrects line number at outlet of resin sluice pump, adds line number at inlet to BRS RHT (loc. D-3),
| |
| corrects valve type for drain valve XWP-271 for waste holdup tank level transmitter (Sh. 1), corrects valve types for valves X-WP-7240 and 7244 (loc. C-3), cor- !
| |
| rects line number at resin fill line to waste evap.
| |
| cond. demineralized, corrects note reference at build-ing designation (loc. B-1), adds line number at outlet of reactor make-up water system (loc. D-5), corrects valve type for valve XWP-7264 at outlet of waste evap.
| |
| reagent tank, adds L.I.P. designation for valve XWP-7247 (loc. C-3), adds line number at outlet of waste evaporator feed filter (loc.C-3), changes line class on lines 491 and 915 (loc. B-5), deletes out of function inputs / outputs for waste evaporator and adds note for figure reference, adds line numbers (loc. G-6), shows lines out of function (loc. C-2, A-1, C-1) and adds waste evaporator skid identifier (sh. 2) to agree with as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-4 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Provisions for use of portable, vendor-supplied Filter-Demineralized.
| |
| Incorporated by LDCR 89-382.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| | |
| pnp 1 ,
| |
| g, Att'achment 'to TXX-89201 May.-1, 1989
| |
| .Page 292 of 439 3
| |
| .FSAR'Page (as amended)' Description Changes existing drawings to show components added per DCA 68761 to allow use of portable, vendor-supplied 1 Filter-Demineralized.
| |
| Group: 3 m Related-SER Section: 11.2.1
| |
| .SER/SSER Impact: No Figure'11.2-4 See Sheet No(s):01, 02 and 03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revisions.to Figure 11.2-4 Shts. 1,2 & 3.
| |
| : . Justification:
| |
| Incorporates LDCR 88-493 and portions of 88-964, 368, and 570 for this figure and reclassifies components per DEP-150 and Reg. Guide 1.143, reflects DCA 77446 to as-sure sump flow path during SSE, shows common isolation valve provided for' feed to evaporator, and. indicates RWMS boundary to be down stream of XWP-305 (loc. F-4,.
| |
| Sh.11.2-4 Sh 1) to agree with as-built' conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No-Figure 11.2-4 See Sheet No(s):02 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) !
| |
| . Upgrade drain piping to SC 3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Upgrades run of piping from safeguards building floor drain sumps 1 and 2 to the floor drain tank to safety class 3 to ensure that ESF equipment is protected from flooding.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure'11.2-4 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarification to Figure 11.2-4 Sh.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds note to clarify present and former valve numbers on figure.
| |
| Group: 4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 11.2-5 . De:;c ription : (Editorial)
| |
| Miscellaneous minor changes to reflect as-built conditions for Demineralized and Reactor Make-up Water System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Reflects as-built piping configurations on the flow diagrams.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 9.2.3 SER/SSER impact: No i
| |
| | |
| JAttachment . to TXX-89201'
| |
| # 'May 1, 1989 Page 293 of'439-
| |
| -)
| |
| FSAR PageL
| |
| -(asiamended) . Description Figure 11.2-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Addition of two new laundry holdup and monitor tank pumps ptr DCA 80724. !
| |
| Ch'anges made per LDCR 89-383. J I
| |
| 'Justificatie:
| |
| Changes reilect two new-pumps added to accomodate the
| |
| . capacity. of a temporary, . portable, . vendor-supplied Fi1- l.
| |
| ', iter-Demineralized.that will be used; the provisions for which were made under DCA 68761 (LDCR 88-570). ~
| |
| ~
| |
| Group: 3 .
| |
| .Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER-Impact: No Figure 11.2-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Addition)
| |
| Provisions for use of portable, vendor-supplied Filter-Demineralized.
| |
| Incorporated-by LDCR 89-383.
| |
| .-Justification:
| |
| Changes existing drawings to show components added per DCA 68761 to allow use of portable, vendor-supplied Filter-Demineralized.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No.
| |
| Figure 11.2-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) l Corrections to figure for Liquid Waste Processing Drain Channel C.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Makes corrections to Class 5 lines in figure (ref. DCA 78905) to reflect as-built condition. - '
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Incorporates LDCR 89-001 and portions of LDCRs 740, 3 570,and 246, and adds line number to laundry & hot E " shower tank in'.et to agree with as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes to Figure 11.2-6.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change is necessary to reflect the correct relative locations of lines 3-WP-X-135-151R-5 and 3-WP-X-501-151R-5.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.0
| |
| | |
| .. Attachment Eto TXX-89201-May 1, 1989 Page' 294 c ~i 439 '
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description
| |
| .SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-6, 7,
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| - Changes to Figures 11.2-6 & 7.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises. figure to show true order of branch lines:135'
| |
| , .and 501 down stream of spent resin sluce filter,true location of drain line 919 for spent resin storage tank, true. location of line 137 for CVCS-Therm. Reg.
| |
| Demin, header, and corrects line number leading ~.to CVCS-Therm. Reg. Demin. 3,4,& 5 to as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Editorial change to figure 11.2-6 to correct a valve numbering error.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change required to correct a drafting error.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-6, 7 '
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction to Figures 11.2-6 and 11.2-7 to show the correct relative positions of various branch lines and drain lines.
| |
| -Justification:
| |
| Corrections required to indicate true relative posi-tions of branch and drain lines.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Editorial change to Figure 11.2-6 to change certain valv? numbers from those assigned by Westinghouse ~to
| |
| .the correct CPSES numbers.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change required to maintain consistency with CPSES valve numbering system.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-6, 7 See Sheet No(s):08
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Corrections to Figures 11.2-6,7 & 8 Justification:
| |
| Incorporates corrections and editorial changes of LDCRs 88-257, 799, 796, 259,734,906, and portions of 570 for O_==________--____
| |
| | |
| L Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| , May 1,.1989 {
| |
| ! Page 295 of 439 -
| |
| 1 FSAR Page -
| |
| -(as amended) Description those figures. Also adds reach rods for two valves, pro-vijes spent resin sample capability and reclassifies B.ron Recycle and Radwaste Systems per DEP-150 and Reg.
| |
| Guide 1.143.
| |
| l Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction to Figure .11.2-7 to show the tie-in connec-tions of various lines, and to show a reducer between l several of the lines.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| L Corrections are required to match as-built conditions-of the plant.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction to Figure 11.2-7 to show the installation of additional piping provided to enhance Spent Resin Storage and Transfer System flush capabilities.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Correction required to show a design modification.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.2.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) ;
| |
| Correction to Figure 11.2-7 to show the tie-in connec-tions of various lines, and to show a reducer between i several of the lines.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrections are required to match as-built conditions of the plant.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.2-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Editorial change to Figure 11.2-8 to provide component identification numbers for various items.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Component identification numbers were inadvertently ommitted from the figure.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER impact: No
| |
| | |
| > Attachment "to TXX-89201
| |
| ;May : 1,-- 1989 -
| |
| LPage 296.of 439 FSAR Page
| |
| ,(as amended) Description F,igure 11.2-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| . Provisions for use of portable, vendor-supplied Filter-i Demineralized.
| |
| Incorporated by'LDCR 89-384.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes existing drawings to show components added per.
| |
| DCA 68761 to allow use of portable, vendor-supplied _
| |
| Filter-Demineralized.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.3-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) . .
| |
| Deletes reference to ASME code and statement in text for Equipment Description and Component Design of
| |
| , Liquid Waste Processing System regarding which'materi-als'are not used.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes to reflect compliance with the code, code class, safety class and seismic classification require-ments of ANSI /ANS-51.1-1983, Table A-1 for the Boron Recycle System components and the code, code class, safety class and seismic classification requirements of Reg. Guide 1.143 Rev. 1, Table 1 for the Liquid and Gaseous Waste Processing Systems' components.
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| .Related SER Section: 11.2.1
| |
| 'SER/SSER Impact: 'No 11.3-8, 9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrections to text for hydrogen recombiner alarm func-tions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects descriptions of hydrogen.recombiner flow con-centration alarm fun-tions to agree with as-built de-sign.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No o
| |
| 11.3-13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Movement of discussion of ASLB ALARA stipulation from Chapter 12 to Chapter 11.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| : Editorial change to incorporate ASLB ALARA stipulation regarding CFUR contention to the more appropriate loc-ation of Chapter 11.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| g 4 9 AltAchment to'TXX-89201 May 1,~1989'
| |
| -Page 297 of 439
| |
| 'FSAR-Page __ .
| |
| (as ' amended) Description Figure 11.3-1 'See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| ~
| |
| s . Corrections to Figure 11.3-1 sh. 1 Justification:
| |
| Editorial correction to correct the boundary' lines of
| |
| 'the waste gas compressor skid.
| |
| Group:'4
| |
| ~
| |
| , -Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER impact: No 1Figur_e _11.3-1 SeeSheetNo(s):01
| |
| ;0escription: (Editorial)' .,
| |
| Corrections to Figure 11.3-1 sh.1 ~l
| |
| : Justification:
| |
| Editorial' corrections to show correct valve numbers on
| |
| . figure.
| |
| Group: 4 Relat'ed SER Section: 11.2 g SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.3-1 .See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| . Corrections to Figure 11.3-1 sh. 1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Correction to show location of RWMS and to provide mis-sing line number designations. 1 Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2 l SER/SSER Impact: No Figure ~11'3-1 .
| |
| See. Sheet No(s):01 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) .j Corrections to Figure 11.3-1 Sh.1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| , Removes 3/8 tubing designations from line connecting
| |
| . control valve X-GH-055 to waste gas compressor 1 and L line_ connecting X- 4 066 to waste gas compressor 2 and I corrects waste compressor 1 tag number to agree with ,
| |
| h as-built condition. "
| |
| Group:'3
| |
| 'SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.3-1 See' Sheet No(s):01 Description- (Correction)
| |
| Corrections to Figure 11.3-1 Sh.1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provides corrections to pipe class at inlet to WPS-Gas Recomb. 2, line class at outlet of valve 79098 (loc.G-4),line number at inlet to valve 7910A (loc. B 2) and
| |
| : j. and line system designation up stream of valve 040 (loc. B-5) to agree with as-built condition.
| |
| Group: 3 i
| |
| | |
| hn p
| |
| O/ -
| |
| Attachment- -to TXX-89201 1 ,
| |
| ;May-1, 1989 .
| |
| Page'298.of 439
| |
| , a 4
| |
| :FSAR.Page R (as amended) Description -l SER/SSER Impact: No-Figure 11.3-1 See Sheet-No(s):01 thru 06
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) ls , Corrections to Figure 11'.3-1 Shts. 1-6
| |
| ' Justification:
| |
| Incorporates changes of LDCRs. 360,425,440,497,510,512,
| |
| , 513,522,526,541,600,693;705,792,818,819,820,844,865, L- 892, and portions of 552 and 964 for these figures.
| |
| Also reclassifies Boron Recycle and Radwaste Systems e per DEP-150 and Reg.' Guides 1.143 and'1.26, andr'eclas-sifies 3/4" CCW supply and return to H2_recombiner heat exchangers for seismic considerations.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| : m Figure 11.3-l' :See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| : 1. ~ ' ' '
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| '(Correction)
| |
| Correction to Figure 11.3-1 to include a reducer on the outlet. side of PCV-1107A.
| |
| ' Justification:
| |
| Correction is required to match the as-built configura-tion of-the plant.
| |
| Group:.3 Related SER Section: 11.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.3.1 See-Sheet No(s):02
| |
| ;~
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Correction)
| |
| Corrections to Figure 11.3-1 Sh. 2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects line number down stream of check valve 7931A (loc. B 1) and corrects valve number on line 250 (loc.
| |
| E 4):to agree with as-built condition.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| , Figure 11.3-1 See. Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Editorial change to Figure 11.3-1, sheet 3, to add a pipe classification break symbol and a line number designation.
| |
| ' Justification:
| |
| Change required to correct drafting ommissions.
| |
| Group: 4 Related.SER Section: 11.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No o
| |
| = = _ _ __ - 1
| |
| | |
| w ,
| |
| e '
| |
| HAttachment- to TXX-89201 MayL1,;1989-
| |
| :Page 299.of 439 FSAR Page C
| |
| -(as amended)' Description
| |
| , : Figure 11.3-1 See. Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)-
| |
| Correction to Figure 11.3-1 sh. 3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provides correct'line number for WPS-Drain Header.
| |
| Group: 4 2 SER/SSER Impact: No !
| |
| ' figure ~11.3 See Sheet.No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| - (Correction)
| |
| Correction to Figure 11.3-1 Sh. 3 Justification:
| |
| Corrects tag number of gas analyrer rack to as-buil't.
| |
| Group: 3 .
| |
| SER/SSER_ Impact: No Figure.11.3-1 See Sheet No(s):03 .
| |
| t
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction to Figure 11.3-1 Sh. 3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects isolation ~ valve number for pressure transmit-ter 1103B (loc. C-2).
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.3-1 See Sheet No(s):03 and 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction to Figure 11.3-1, sheets 3 and 5, to show the correct type of valve operator device.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Correction is required to resolve a drafting error.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.3-1 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Editorial. change to Figure 11.3-1, Sheet 4, to change line number 1-GH-X-180-152R-3 to 1-GH-X-180-151R3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Figure requires change to correct a drafting error.
| |
| Group: 4 f Related SER Section: 11.2 L SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.3-1 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Incorporates changes to correct the inability of the vent condenser eductor to drain condensate during low flow operation and the inability of the design of the vent condenser to prevent air inleakage or pressure surges. Adds new line numbers on recycle evaporator.
| |
| w_a-_-_-_ _ - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
| |
| | |
| l
| |
| ' f l' Att'achmenti t'o TXX-89201~
| |
| May 1,.1989-
| |
| , (Page 300 of 439
| |
| ;FSf.R Page..
| |
| /(as amended)-. Description Justification:
| |
| Changes are necessary to correct the following problems: (1) the vent condenser eductor will not drain condensate during low flow ~ operation, and (2) the "present" design of the vent condenser does not prevent air inleakage.or pressure. surges. (88-552)
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11 ~. 2. 2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ' Figure-11.3-1
| |
| ' See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)-
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provides missing line numbers to figure (loc. E-5 & 6) to agree'with as-built.
| |
| Group: 4 SER/SSER Impact: No 1
| |
| ' Figure 11.3-1l See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial) ;
| |
| Justification: i Provides locked closed designations to valves XGH-023 (loc. 0-4), 2GH-7935-(loc. F-5), and 2GH-7894 (loc.F-3).
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| -Figure 11'.3-1 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction to Figure 11.3-1 Sh. 4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| -Adds line number to line up stream of check valve 2GH-7893 (loc. F-3) to agree with as-built.
| |
| !'l Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.3-1 See Sheet No(s):04 and 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrections to Figure 11.3-1 Shts. 4 & 5.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| E Corrects direction of flow to be from gas trap to WPS 1 compressor suction header.
| |
| L Group: 3 l SER/SSER Impact: No 1:
| |
| 1 Figure 11.3-1 See Sheet No(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Addition of a line number and a change to a pipe i classification on sheet 5 of Figure 11.3-1. .
| |
| Justification: l Adds line number at inlet to valve 7955 (loc. E-5) to I
| |
| L.___________.____________--_-_,.__. _
| |
| | |
| ' Attachment to TXX-89201 May'l, 1989 Page 301 of'439
| |
| .,FSAR-Page (as-amended) Description ~
| |
| agre= with as-built' condition.
| |
| Group:.4 Related SER Section: 11.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.3-1 .SeeSheetNo(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction).
| |
| N Correction to Figure 11.3-1 Sh. 5.
| |
| : Justification:
| |
| Correction-to line number down stream of gas trap 1 to as-built.
| |
| L Group: 3; !
| |
| SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 11 3-1 See Sheet No(s):06 y
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrections to Figure 11.3-1 Sh. 6.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects positions of lines 116 and 147 relative.to line 078, removes 2"X 1" reducer form line 078 and shows line 078-continuing to tank no. 10 to reflect as-built conditions.
| |
| Group: 3-SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 11.3-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Movement of ASLB ALARA stipulation from Chapter 12 to Chapter 11.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Editorial change to move the ALARA stipulation regard--
| |
| ing discharges to the more appropriate location of Chapter 11.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Miscellaneous clarification statements for Section 11.5.1.
| |
| (Changed design objective discussing the system capability to provide indication and record of radiation levels).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The system does not provide a continuous record of radiation levels but stores various averages that may be printed on demand. Also alarm conditions are record-ed automatically on the RMS console printers in the control room. .
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| l
| |
| ' Attachments to TXX-89201'
| |
| ' Hay 1, 1989
| |
| '_Page 302 of'439
| |
| 'FSAR Page
| |
| '(as amended)- Description 11.5-2,.3 '
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| ' Miscellaneous clarification statements for Section.
| |
| 11.5.1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change required to clarify the configuration of monitors for control room ventilation intake.and plant vent stack.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Miscellaneous clarification statements for Section 11.5.1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarified discussion of when effluent ' release. paths are monitored, by noting that during purges or vents the containment effluent is discharged.via the plant' vent stacks where it is monitored by both the PIG and the WRGM.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| .Related SER Section: 11.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| .11.5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarification of PRMS design criterion regarding description of the method a check source / current is provided, in order to match actual design.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| r A check current is not originated at the detector, but is provided for each detector, (not having a check source), from a remote location. ,
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| .11.5-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Addition of information describing process for release of turbine building drain effluent.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provided clarification of methods of monitoring for potential radioactivity for the alternate methods of releasing turbine building drain effluent.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.1 & 3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11 5-5, 9 7 .See Page No(s):10, 11, 15, 19, 25 and 38
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Miscellaneous clarification statements for section 11.5.2 to clarify descriptions or component capabilities.
| |
| s.
| |
| j[ ..
| |
| ~. ._ __ __ ___- ___ _ _____ - _ - _ _ - _.
| |
| | |
| PS
| |
| ' Attach' ment to TXX-89201
| |
| 'May 1, 1989:
| |
| .-Page 303 of 439 FSAR Page
| |
| '(as amended); Description Justification:
| |
| Changes required to clarify the description of compo-nents or provide more' precise wording of text.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| '11.5-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial) r Terminology correction from minimum detectable concen-trationtominimumdetectableactivity'(MDA).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Editorial correction.
| |
| Group: 4 -
| |
| Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-7, 23'
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Clarification- of statements in section 11.5.2 regarding use of ANSI N13.3.
| |
| Originally part of LDCR 89-091.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes statements in 11.5.2.1 and 11.5.2.6 to note that the guidance of ANSI N13.1 was considered du-ing design but that strict adherence to it was not' intended 1 or achieved.
| |
| Group: 4 Related'SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| (The modifier ' continuous' was provided to note that only continuous process streams that discharge directly to the environment, and do not normally contain radio-active material, have monitors.)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Only systems that do not normally contain radioactive-material and that have continuous release points are equipped with radiation monitors. Systems that do not normally contain rad!oactive material and that are only released on a batch basis, are not equipped with radiation monitors.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification statements for section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revised discussion of expected concentrations with res-pect to 10CFR 20 limits. Use of' site boundary' revised to be Exclusion Area Boundary and discharge point for
| |
| | |
| l tl -
| |
| Atiachment- to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 i; _' Page 304 of 439 FSAR Page
| |
| -(as amended) Description gaseous and liquid effluents respectively to agree with Technical Specification and other FSAR section wording.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER-Impact: No 11.5-10, 11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section:11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Text was revised to clarify which monitors,have seismic panels in the control room and to clarify the function and use of the seismic panels.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-10, 13 SeePageNo(s):22
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrections to sections 11.5.2.5.1, 11.5.2.5.2 and 11.5.2.5.7 regarding the method in which alarm messages are communicated between the detector microprocessors and the RM-11 console.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| -The detector microprocessors do not initiate the trans-mission of information. They only provide information when polled or' requested by the RM-11 console.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ( 11.5-12
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification . statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarified the description of how calculations are per-formed in the monitor microprocessors to delete details of computer calculations not required for the FSAR.
| |
| Group: 4 ,
| |
| Related SER Section: 11.3
| |
| .o SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5-12 0 ascription: (Correction)
| |
| Deletion of description of monitor processor data storage characteristics from the digital system description.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| L The exact number of bytes used for data storage is L
| |
| '=
| |
| likely to vary. This level of detail is inappropriate for the FSAR.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| .. L~; _. .
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| , May'1,.1989 >
| |
| b, 7 Page.305.of 439-i FSAR Page- R
| |
| -(as amended) ' Description
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| ~
| |
| L11.5-13' Correction to the discussion in section 11.5.2.5.2 ,
| |
| regarding power supplies for radiation process l monitor assemblies.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| . Change was made to describe the auxiliary / emergency power supply to monitors, and to be consistent with respone provided to the NRC in letter TXX-89124.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-13, 20
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes description of use of optical coupler isolators for monitor assemblies.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change was required because not all isolators employ optical couplers.
| |
| E Group:.2 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No l11.5-13, 14 See Page No(s):15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarification of discussion of monitoring assembly control parameters, by deleting detailed vendor data and only incorporating general features in the general discusssion.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The detailed vendor data was extracted directly from the vendor's technical documentation and is too detailed for the FSAR.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-14, 17
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| " Justification:
| |
| Deleted the discussion of the seismic operator panels to eliminate duplication of information provided in section 11.5.2.5.1.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No-11.5-15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction regarding description of data processing activities conducted by monitor microprocessors pertaining to subtraction, of background from gross count rate.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| | |
| lI t~
| |
| /A'tachment to TXX-89201'
| |
| ?May:1,.1989-lPage 306 of 439.
| |
| :FSAR Page.
| |
| '(as amended) Description i
| |
| The kMS does not calculate' background values. Back-ground values must be entered into the database by operators.
| |
| Group:.2 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletion of discussion of monitor microprocessor conununications .in section 11.5.2.5.2 to remove redundant and detailed vendor infonnation, Justification:
| |
| Deletion of this section removes extraneous and detailed information not appropriate for the FSAR.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-17, 18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Correction)
| |
| Deleted desriptive detai.1 of control room console microcomputer memory information.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Detailed information of this type is unnecessary for an FSAR.
| |
| -Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No.
| |
| 11.5-17'
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| R.evised the description of the RMS console monitor-trend display to delete extraneous detailed information and provide only the general information about signif-icant data that can be obtained from the display.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-18, 19 '
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction). ,
| |
| Deletion of excessive description of Report Computer operation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| . Previous level of detail is not appropriate for
| |
| ? inclusion in FSAR.
| |
| L Group:'3 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| J
| |
| 'Att'achment to TXX-89201
| |
| 'EMay 1, 19894 p Page.307 of 439 4
| |
| 'FSAR Page
| |
| -(as amended) ' Description 11.5-18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletion of excessive details of Report Computer operation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| . Previous level of detail is not appropriate'for inclu-sion'in the FSAR.
| |
| Group: 3 L Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-19, 35
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) 5 Various clarification statements for Section'11.5.2.
| |
| (Inserted modifier '(WRGMs and PIGS)' ).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change required to note that an operator panel is provided for both' plant vent stack Wide Range. Gas Moni-tors (WRGMs) and Pariculate, Iodine and Gas monitors (PIGS).
| |
| Group: 4.
| |
| Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No ;
| |
| l
| |
| .11.5-19, 20 See Page No(s):21 J
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Editorial corrections for clarification and deletion of-portions of discussion on Control Room Equipment Racks. l Justification: 1 Parts of information deleted to reduce redundancy and repetiveness, and' removes descriptive detail that is inappropriate for the FSAR and in some cases does not match as-built plant conditions.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-20
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| ! Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deleted the description of RMS communication cabling to eliminate redundant information provided in section E 11.5.2.5.2.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No ;
| |
| i f il.5-21
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) '
| |
| Various clarification statements for-Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification: ;
| |
| Change provides a more accurate description of the j means available to provide RMS setpoint security and of i the likely method for providing administrative control of setpoints without assigning specific responsibility.
| |
| [,
| |
| o . . .
| |
| 3
| |
| | |
| A 1
| |
| | |
| ==Attachment:==
| |
| 'to~TXX-89201
| |
| . May l', 1989=
| |
| Page:308 of 439 L
| |
| o
| |
| ; FSAR Page (as amended) Description Group:.4 Related SER Section:~11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| ' 11.5-23,.'24
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification).
| |
| Various clarification statements. for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| (Changed this section to a general discussion applica-ble to all off-line airborne monitors).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Section was modified so that it would generally apply
| |
| .to all off-line airborne monitors. The specific dis-
| |
| -cussions of Containment air monitors and plant vent WRGMs were deleted, as they are specifically discussed in sections 11'.5.2.6.2 and 11.5.2.6.3,' respectively.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No l l
| |
| 11'5 .
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarified description of Containment air monitor compo-nents to maintain consistency with plant descriptions.
| |
| Also changed the frequency of filter tape replacement to reflect that the plant vent WRGM sample filters are used for particulate and iodine sample collection for effluent accountability.
| |
| Group:.4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-25
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) i Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changed ' iodine filter' to ' iodine cartridge' in the description of sample' air flow path to more precisely describe the component.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 l SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5-26, 35
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) i Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2. !
| |
| Justification: !
| |
| Revised the discussion to state that each plant vent l stack is configured with a separate Particulate, lodine and Gas (PIG) monitor, and a Wide Range Gas Monitor (WRGM).
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| _. i
| |
| | |
| ~ Att'achment - to TXX-89201 May.1,.1989 Page 309 ofc439
| |
| .FSAR Page (as amended) Description 11.5-26 '
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Added the modifier 'P1G' prior to discussion of plant-
| |
| , vent st'ack monitors that'use filter paper viewed by beta-sensitive scintillation detectors. This discussion e applies on7y to the. PIG monitors.
| |
| Group:-4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 11.5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction to discussion of plant vent stack PIG iodine channel function, regarding its use for release-accounting and collection and analysis of other radio-
| |
| .nuclides.
| |
| Justification: ,
| |
| This discussion was deleted because the PIG iodine channel' i'- only. used for real time monitoring of .
| |
| releases and not release accountability. Also this channel is specifically. calibrated and aligned to.
| |
| monitor I-131. No other isotopes are monitored by this channel, Group: 2 Related SER-Section: 11.2 & 3 SER/SSER Impact: No.
| |
| 11.5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) .
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section-11.5.2.
| |
| (Clarified the discussion of the capabilities of the PIG and WRGM monito'rs).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| : 1. A ohrase was added to clarify that the PIG gas chan-nel can only be used as a backup to the WRGM for normal range gas monitoring because it has no auto-matic control function, for high levels of airborne radioactivity.
| |
| : 2. Added a phrase noting that a monitor is provided for extended range noble gas monitoring for each stack, --
| |
| in order to more clearly state the function of the WRGM.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-27
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| V6rious clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| (Changes made to discussion of WRGM filters to more precisely describe replacement and counting activities)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| : 1. Modifier 'WRGM' was added before ' particulate' to reflect that the subject action only applies to the b....... . . . __
| |
| ~!
| |
| | |
| I Attach:ent' 'to-TXX-89201 l
| |
| May 1, 1989
| |
| ! Page:310 of 439
| |
| .I 3
| |
| FSAR Page-
| |
| - (as amended); Description ;
| |
| WRGM. .l
| |
| : 2. Modifier 'at least''was added before ' weekly' to note that filters will be change more frequently '
| |
| when required.
| |
| -3. Phrase 'for release accountability' was added to the sentence describing filter replacement and analysis to clarify that the WRGM particulate and iodine fil-ters are used for-effluent accountability / reporting.
| |
| : 4. Phrase 'by the WRGM' was added to discussion of automatic closure function to note that this is performed by the WRGM only.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-28:
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changed the wording used to describe a primary to se-condary leak to more precisely describe the event.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 <
| |
| -SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| - 11.5-30
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changed the general description of liquid sampling de-vices to note that there.are three types of liquid monitors rather than just the off-line monitors.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No j 11 5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Reworded the discussion on comparison of liquid mon' tor readings with grab sample analysis results to improve the readability of the text.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER.Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| 11.5-31
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) !
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification: j Change improves the wording of the sentence that dis- !
| |
| cusses indications of primary to secondary leaks; and I changes a component name to ' condenser off-gas monitor' to maintain consistency with station terminology.
| |
| , Group: 4 1
| |
| | |
| W, + -
| |
| w ''
| |
| b ,- .
| |
| ' Att'achment to TXX-89201 7 ':May'1,31989c
| |
| . Page'311;of"439 '
| |
| x,
| |
| :FSAR Page (as' amended)' Description E Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ~11;5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) . .
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Modified the sentence describing the function of the Service Water Monitors to more' precisely. identify the J function of service water monitors, i Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER' Impact: No
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| ~
| |
| -.11.5-34 i Update of discussion of location of spent fuel ps ' 1 demineralized monitors. !
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change was made to show that the correct location of f
| |
| this detector is downstream of the spent fue.1 pool process demineralized.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact:'No
| |
| '11.5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Cla'rification)
| |
| Changed section titles from Spent-Fuel Cooling Water
| |
| -Sample Monitor to Spent Fuel Pool Demineralized Monitor and from Spent fuel Cooling Water Monitor to Spent ~ j Fuel Pool Cooling Water Monitor.- l Justification:
| |
| . Corrections to maintain consistency with station term-inology.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| > 11. 5 ~ 3 4 ', 3 5..
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Additional clarification to sections 11.5.2.7.8 and 11.5.2.7.9 is provided to note.that monitors are pro-y vided for each spent fuel pool demineralized and each E spent fuel pool cooling water system train.
| |
| t Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-34 .
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction to location description for spent fuel pool demineralized monitor.
| |
| ~ Justification: )
| |
| Sample monitors were previously moved to the new loca-m_=--------.-----_ - - 1
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 312 of 439
| |
| .FSAR Page (as amended) Descripti tion to receive flow directly from the spent fuel pool process demineralized instead of the demineralized sam- !
| |
| pie line. '
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 9.1.3 SER/SSER Impact: No l
| |
| 11.5-35
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) '
| |
| Provides discussion of Turbine Building Orain Monitor ;
| |
| effluent trip function.
| |
| Justification: ,
| |
| Clarification to more accurately indicate as-built de- !
| |
| sign and functions of the drain monitors.
| |
| Group: 4 Related CER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-36
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction to discussion of monitor sensitivity to delete unrelated information. !
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change deletes information that is not related to monitor sensitivity.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-36
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction to the discrssion that quantifies monitor accuracy.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The statement that quantifies monitor accuracy was de-leted from section 11.5.2.9 because there is no cal-culational basis for this statement and it is not included in the RMS purchase specifications.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No i 11.5-36, 37 See Page No(s):38
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Revision to section 11.5.2.11 that provides a more de-tailed discussion of monitor calibration.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The text being replaced only described a transfer cal-ibration, related to the factory calibration, for per-forming onsite calibrations. The replacement text in-cludes all of the techniques currently used for per- i forming onsite calibrations. Also required calibration 4 frequencies are contained in the 00CM.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.3
| |
| __-A
| |
| | |
| .m j
| |
| YAttachmenb to'TXX-89201!-
| |
| HMay#1,:3989: . . . 1 4' Page.313 ofJ439- .
| |
| 'l l- i b FSAR Page r !(as. amended)'- . Description fu SER/SSER Impact: No R
| |
| W11.5-38:.
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| .Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| ' Justification:
| |
| Changed the discussion'of the use of: check sources for b
| |
| calibration to note that requirements for check source tests are contained in'section 11.5.2.12.
| |
| Group: 4 y Related 3ER Section: 11.3 i
| |
| . SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| , 11.5-38
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) ~
| |
| Corrections to discussion of monitor check sources.
| |
| Deletion of sentence noting that remotely operated
| |
| . check sources are related to the primary standard, and deletion of~ statement that all monitors have a solenoid
| |
| ,1 operated check source.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| : 1. The~ check source is not related to.the primary stan-dard. It provides a qualitative test of detector re-e sponse, rather than a. quantitative calibration check
| |
| , 2. Not all' monitor check sources are solenoid operated.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section:.11.3 SER/SSER' Impact: No
| |
| .11.5-38,'39-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)-
| |
| Revision of the general description of Process Radiation Monitor System tests and inspections.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This change more accurately.' describes the. operability tests and inspections performed by the system including the following items:
| |
| o automatic operability verification, ;
| |
| o monthly manual verification of detector response only
| |
| : for certain critical detectors, o more general statement requiring monitor failures to
| |
| : r. be investigated, rather than requi.iig use of por-table check source, provides opera anal flexibility;
| |
| , - diagnostic tests initiated remot ;y can often be I, used to identify problems, b
| |
| - entering high dose rate areas to hang a portable check source may not be warranted for non-critical monitors.
| |
| l.' Group: 3 L
| |
| k
| |
| -Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No o
| |
| i.
| |
| ....... ....___ ___._ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ k
| |
| | |
| . Attach' ment- to TXX-89201 1
| |
| :May 1, 1989 l Page 314 of 439 l
| |
| FSAR Page l (as amended) Description I 4
| |
| 11.5-39
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletion of discussion of monitor channel functional i tests to remove incorrect generalizations.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Channel functional tests are only performed quarterly for monitors called out by Technical Specifications or the ODCM. The proposed change to section 11.5.2.12.1, (Check List No. 575.13), identifies these requirements in more detail.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-40
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revision to discussion of detailed inspections and procedures for process radiation monitoring system monitors.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This change provides consisten:y with plant Technical <
| |
| Specifications and the ODCM. Referencing these docu- l ments for requirements should minimize future FSAR changes if these requirements should be revised. The test and inspection requirements for non-Tech Spec or non-0DCM monitors have been expanded to apply to all i other process monitors rather than the selected ones discussed in the original section.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.3 ,
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-41
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Modified discussion of use of manufacturer's mainte-nance recommendations to allow for the fact that main-tenance other than vendor recommended items may be per-formed based on operational experience.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-43
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section 11.5.2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| : 1. Changed line item describing meteorological
| |
| ' sampling' program to ' monitoring' program to more l precisely identify its function.
| |
| : 2. Clarified the description of central computer capa-bilities to note that it stores data and may be used to print information.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| .Related SER Section: 11.3
| |
| [
| |
| L -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - _ - _ _ _ - - - - - - - _ - - - - _ - - _
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 315 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-43
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarification to discussion of radiological sampling system described in section 11.5.2.14.
| |
| Originally LDCR 89-148.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises text to indicate type of analysis used is Gamma 1sotopic. Previous wording of " multichannel" was a type of detector rather than an analysis.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-44, 45 See Page No(s):46 and 47
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revision to section 11.5.3 describing effluent monitoring and sampling process, to be consistent with Technical Specifications and ODCM.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This change ensures consistency with the CPSES + ' fluent sa.npling program requirements as outlined in the Tech-nical Specifications and Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (00CM).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 11.5-48, 49
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects type of Gamma Spectrometer used for lab. anal-ysis. Deletes sentence " Gaseous tritium samples are collected by condensation or absorbtion.
| |
| Originally LDCR 88-713.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises text to agree with existing laboratory equip-ment. Deletes statement of method for tritium collec-tion to allow flexibility and alternate methods.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No Tabic 11.5-1, 4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Typographical corrections to Table 11.5-1.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| SE-11 and SE-07 were changed to SE-11 and SE-07, respectively, IE was changed to IE, XE-1331 was changed to XE-133, 1E-04 was changed to 1E+04, and 1E-04 was changed to 1E-01. Spent fuel pool water was changed to spent fuel pool cooling water.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ __ _ _ _ _ . ___ 1
| |
| | |
| L ' Attachment to TXX-89201 L May l' 1989 2
| |
| .i j Page 316 of 439 e
| |
| i
| |
| : l. FSAR Page-
| |
| -(as= amended) Description
| |
| - 4ble 11.5 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction to add locations-of Control Room intake rad .
| |
| iation monitors.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds missing information on Control Room intake radia-tion monitors (location.and figures) to table.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact:.No Table 11.5-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Typographical corrections to Table 11.5-2.
| |
| Justification: 'l Detector KRE 5250 was changed to RE 5250 and Atn. was !
| |
| changed to Attr.
| |
| Group: 4 Related'SER Section: 11.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.5-3 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Typographical corrections to Table 11.5-3. 3 Justification: l Valve HVC-014 was changed'to HCV-014. j Group: 4 ~i Related SER Section: 11.3 i I
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Table 11.5-3 SeeSheetNo(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrects information in table on local indicator and alarm types and monitor name for the spent fuel pool ,
| |
| demineralized monitors. '
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Corrects information on local alarms and name for moni-tors to agree with as-built design and plant nomencla-
| |
| .ture. Monitors were previously moved to a new. location as described in changes to 11.5.2.7.8 (LOCR 89-154).
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| , Related SER Section: 9.1.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table'11.5-4 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 07
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revision to incorporate changes to sampling frequency, i sample type, sample amount, types of analyses, and re- ;
| |
| quired lower limits of detection; corrects sample pro-cesses and expected concentrations and provides 'later' information.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| . Sample locations, size, frequencies and processes rev-
| |
| | |
| ['
| |
| .I I ' Attachment t6 TXX-89201-
| |
| 'May 1,c1989L Q
| |
| , Page 317.of 439' ;
| |
| 1 ;
| |
| .FSAR Page 'i
| |
| -(as araended): Description ;
| |
| ised to better reflect plant design and sampling pro- l gram and/or Technical Specifications.and ODCM. Deletes j
| |
| redundant information and unnecessary reference to sam- .l pie fhw rates.. Corrects types.of enalyses and-lower !
| |
| limits of detection to current technology and termin- ,
| |
| ology used l Group: 2 l Related SER Section: 11.3 )
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No j 12d-1 6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial) ;
| |
| -Justification: . !
| |
| Changes " health physics" to " radiation protection". ,
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.1 SER/SSER impact: No 1 12.1-1: Descriptica: (Revision)
| |
| Justification-Revices. wording to indicate that health physics training is not provided by the RPM. Such trairing is .
| |
| provided by the training department. :!
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.1 1 SER/SSER Impact: No ;
| |
| '12.1-l' See Page No(s):06,07gh 12.1-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| -(Editorial) -
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Global change cf Texas Utilities Generating Company or TUGC0 to TV Electric.
| |
| -Group: 4-Related SER Section: 12.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ~12.1-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification: 1 Adds "INP0" as a source of operating plant experience.
| |
| Group: 4 1 Related SER Section: 12.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 1
| |
| 12'.1-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) ]
| |
| Global change to revision of Regulatory Guide 8.8 that governs design of CPSES. i Justification: '
| |
| Per letter TXX-89124 to the NRC, Regulatory Guide 8.8, Revision 3 is applicable to the CPSES design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12 SER/SSER Impact: No 4
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 ;
| |
| Page 318 of 439. '
| |
| FSAR Page -
| |
| (as amended) Description 12.1-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes units on the valves shown from "Ft3" to ;
| |
| "Ft2". I Group: 3 Related SER Section:-12.1 ;
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No l 12.1-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clari fication.)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes "in this area" and rewords the sentence discussing chemistry controls studies.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.1-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes " working closely with other departments" and corrects the spelling of " identify".
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 1
| |
| 12.1-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Editorial changes to sentence discussing the use of information received from other operating nuclear power plants.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.1 SER/SSER Impact: No l
| |
| 12.1-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes " restricted areas" to "radiatien controlled areas". Also makes other editorial changes. i Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.1-6 See Page No(s):and Figure 12.1-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes the sentence concerning the agreement to the stipulation with respect to ALARA shown in Figure 12.1-1. The statement and figure will be included in an appropriate location in Chapter 11.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.1 l' SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ . . _ _ _ _ _ ._ ____ a
| |
| | |
| L.
| |
| Attachment :to TXX-89201 r May 1,.1989-Page.319 of.439
| |
| 'FSAR Page
| |
| -(as amended) Description
| |
| ? 12.~ 1 - 7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification).
| |
| o Justification:
| |
| L Revises the discussion of the reviews performed by l the Corporate Health Physics Supervisor.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No i L 12.'l-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises the discussion of the information received and reviewed by station management.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.1-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises the discussion of topics pertaining to the ALARA philosophy included in R.P. Training Program.
| |
| Changes the reference of "Section 12.5.3" to "Section 12.5.3.4".
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure-12.1-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Relocates Figure 12.1-1 to Chapter 11.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarification of FSAR by relocating Figure 12.1-1 to Chapter 11, where it is more appropriate.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 12.2-20
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Radioactive Sources. 1 Justification:
| |
| Complete update of this listing of radioactive sources.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 12.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Global change to revision of Regulatory Guide 8.8 that governs design of CPSES.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Per letter TXX-89124 to the NRC, Regulatory Guide 8.8, Revision 3 is applicable to the CPSES design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12
| |
| | |
| p ,
| |
| n F . Attach'mentE to TXX-89201 iMay 1, 1989 Pace 320 of 439'
| |
| .FSAR Page .
| |
| (as amended); Description SER/SSER Impact: No-12.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Miscellaneous' clarification statements for Section 12.3 to describe ORE ALARA design features more precisely.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds the modifier 'where appropriate' to the discussion of the use of canned pumps in item 1 of 12.3.1.1.2.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3.1
| |
| .SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Update to Radiation Protection.Section discussion.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Minor changes to discussion of' refueling water cleanup system.
| |
| . Group: 4 Related SER.Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| : 12. 3 -'3 -
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Miscellaneous clarification statements for Section 12.3 to describe ORE. ALARA design features more precisely.
| |
| . Justification:
| |
| Clarify the text regarding the abilility of the refuel cavity filters to minimize radioactive particulate. 4 Add the modifier 'nonnally' to the description of tanks "
| |
| with sloped bottoms for facilitating draining.
| |
| ,. Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| :12.3-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Miscellaneous clarification statements for Section 12.3 to describe ORE ALARA design features more precisely.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| , Adds the modifier 'where appropriate' to the discussion of use of loop seals in item 2 of 12.3.1.1.3.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 1 12.3-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies statement in Section 12.3 to make it less encompassing.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds' phrase 'where possible' in describing allowance of ample space for piping arrangements.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| _._=_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ = _ _
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 321 of 439
| |
| ~,~
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description 12.3-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Miscellaneous clarification statements for Section 12.3 y to describe ORE ALARA design features more precisely.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies the discussion of use of cable trays and other features that facilitate making and verifying electrical connections when the reactor vessel head is removed.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 12.3-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section 12.3 that modify design descriptions to make them less emcom-passing.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Added the word 'normally' to discussion of use of ie-quately sized, shielded equipment cubicles. Mot' 1 description of equipment removal design features . .um
| |
| 'is incorporated' to 'was considered during'.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Miscellaneous clarification statements for Section 12.3 to describe ORE ALARA design features more precisely.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes wording of pump and heat exchanger remote flushing, from 'are' remotely flushed to 'can be' remotely flushed.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification statements for Section 12.3 that modify design descriptions to make them less emcom-passing. 1 Justification:
| |
| Added modifier 'normally' to description of valves pro-vided with leakoff connections. Added modifier 'nor-mally' to discussion of components that are designed for local decontamination. ;
| |
| Group: 4 )
| |
| Related SER Section: 12.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No l
| |
| p L- _-.
| |
| | |
| I Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 322 of 439 I
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description l 12.3-10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Global change to revision of Regulatory Guide 8.8 that governs CPSES design.
| |
| Justification: ,
| |
| Letter TXX-89124 to the NRC reports that Regulatory l Guide 8.8, Revision 3, applies to the CPSES design. 1 Group: 3 i Related SER Section: Sect. 12 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) {
| |
| Various corrections to Section 12.3 to match the '
| |
| current plant configuration. '
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes sentence noting the use of collars and caps to reduce streaming, as these have not been extensively :
| |
| incorporated in the plant.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 12.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 12.3-14
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Correction to description of maintenance and repair ORE ALARA considerations incorporated in steam generator design.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The discussion of explosive tube plugging is replaced with a brief discussion of the mechanical tube plugging technique that is incorporated in the design of steam generator ORE reduction features.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 12.3-16
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Expands item 4 to include chemistry control to minimize radiation levels and corrosion.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| {
| |
| 12.3-24
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) j Update discussion regarding chemistry control.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Combines the discussion of chemistry control under a single heading of item 4, " Chemistry Control to Minimize Radiation Levels and Corrosion". Changes item 5 to subparagraph b. under item 4.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| _ _ _ - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - 1
| |
| | |
| ' Attachment to TXX-89201-May'1, 1989 4
| |
| Page 323'of'439-FSAR Page
| |
| {asamended) Description 12.3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarif_ication)
| |
| Various' clarification statements ^for Section 12.3 that modify design descriptions to'make them less.emcom-passing.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| ' Changed discussion of-use of peroxide addition to reac-tor coolant for solubilization, to indicate.that--it has been considered but has not'been decided upon.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER.Section: 12.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| . 12.3-27
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Various clarification; statements for Section 12.3 that modify design _ descriptions to make them less emcom-passing.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| ' Deleted the word 'all' in the discussion of applying
| |
| :various equipment shielding techniques to generic equipment types.
| |
| Group:'4 Related SER Section: 12.3.1
| |
| -SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| -12.3-28
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| '(Clarification)
| |
| Miscellaneous clarification statements for Section 12.3 to describe ORE'ALARA design features.more precisely.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds the building in which the hydrogen recombiner is located.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| . 12.3-29
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Sections 12.3.1.2.9 and 12.3.1.2.10 have been replaced by a single section 12.3.1.2.9 that deals with design-related.information on the hot laboratory and counting room.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The discussion of superceded sections 12.3.1.2.9 and 10 dealt primarily with operational concerns. Descriptions of procedures related to controlling, handling and storing of radioactive sources and of activities occurring in the counting room are operational concerns that are addressed in Section 12.5.3.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No I
| |
| | |
| p 1 m .' Attachment to TXX-89201.
| |
| , May 1,.1989
| |
| *9 Page--324 of~439.
| |
| y FSAR Page-(as amended); Description
| |
| .12'.3-29L
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Update discussion regarding design information on the hot lab and counting rooms.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes this section in.its entirety. Section
| |
| .12.3.1.2 should address facility design considerations. 'The discussion in Section-12.3.1.2.10 of counting room activities-is an operational concern. A description of-the chemistry counting room and activities therein is given in Section 12.5.2.2 i Group:.3 )
| |
| Related SER.Section: 12.3 1 SER/SSER. Impact: No 12.3-29
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Clarification)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes " operating. personnel" to " personnel and ,
| |
| equipment". )
| |
| Group: 4-Related SER Section: 12.3 '
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ' 12.3-30
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction); .
| |
| Various corrections to Section 12.3 to match the current configuration ~of the plant.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds the Technical Support Center as one 'of the items-for which radiation shielding provides access under accident conditions.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 12.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No j 12.3-31
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) i Miscellaneous clarification statements for Section 12.3 1 to describe ORE ALARA design features more precisely.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| (1) Clarifies identification of Turbine Building areas that are designated as Zone I areas.
| |
| (2) Clarifies the discussion of the average fraction of l failed fuel ;
| |
| Group: 4 1 Related SER Section: 12.3.1 SER/SSER Impacti No l
| |
| . 12.3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Update discussion to clarify the density of concrete.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| L Changes " density" to " amount" and revises wording to indicate that there is 6,26 lb of concrete per cubic' foot of shield wall.
| |
| _-__:__=__ - - . _ _ _ . .-.
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-8920)
| |
| May 1, 1989~
| |
| Page 325 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description 1
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-35
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Miscellaneous clarification statements for Section 12.3 to describe ORE ALARA design features more precisely.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies discussion of shield design criteria to reflect actual design process.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-39
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarification of water depths during fuel assembly movement and fuel assembly storage.
| |
| ( Justification:
| |
| This change was made to comply with wording in Section 3/4.9.8 of Technical Specifications.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-44
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarify the capability of the computer to retreive data Justification:
| |
| Changes " record" to " display and store".
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3 !
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No !
| |
| 12.3-44 See Page No(s):46, 47, 49, & 50 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) '
| |
| Miscellaneous clarification statements for Section 12.3.4 related to record-keeping and descriptions of monitors and sampling methods.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Thesa changes were generated to respond to NRC ques-tions about Chapter 12 regarding record-keeping inten- ;
| |
| tions and capabilities, and location /use of portable I continuous airborne monitors. The response to these questions is contained in TXX-89124.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes SER 12.3.4 notes the ARMS is designed to... (3) provide a continuous record of radiation levels at key loca-
| |
| , tions throughout the plant... This change replaces all l usage of ' permanent records' with 'on-demand printouts' '
| |
| 1 L ,
| |
| | |
| 4 t',, : Attachment to:TXX-89201-t May l', 1989 k.
| |
| ' ' Page 326 of 439 b
| |
| FSAR.Page
| |
| . (as amended). ' Description 7" ~
| |
| : 12'.3-47'
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Change part, iodine, and noble gas monitors to t G mon-itors.
| |
| . Justification:
| |
| Replaces " particulate, iodine, and noble gas monitors of the Containment buildings" with " Containment PIG monitors".
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3 o SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-48'
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrections to 12.3.4 to be consistent with as-built configuration of the plant.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The statements noting that containment and vent stack sample line lengths from sample point to monitor are as short as possible, are not accurate and should be de-leted. New statements are proposed that note a correc-tion factor has been . applied to account for ar.y depo-sition losses.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 12.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| - 12.3-49
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)-
| |
| Various corrections to Section 12.3 to reflect current design.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change corrects description 'of airborne monitor locations to conform to present design.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-50 .
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes design criteria 3 to state that the system is designed to allow for physical security for access to alarm setpoints and other important data base para-meters, rather than assigning responsibility for administrative control of setpoints to a specific individual.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 12.3-50
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Miscellaneous clarification statements to Section 12.3.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes the wording of the second ARMS function from
| |
| 'the' setpoint, to 'a predetermined' setpoint.
| |
| -uL ._. - .-. ___
| |
| | |
| , .. y..
| |
| I LAttachment .to TXX-89201'
| |
| <May.1,-1989 . . ,
| |
| Page 327 of 439 ,
| |
| 1,
| |
| ,FSAR Page
| |
| '(as' amended) Description -
| |
| Identifies that. the design criteria relates to "the ,
| |
| applicable" DBA. j Group: 4 i Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-51,.54 >
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Corrections to Section 12.3.4.2 regarding presence of ,
| |
| local alarms and indicators for selected detectors. 1 Justification: ;
| |
| 1.) Changes ARMS design criterion 5. to note that only l selected monitors have local indication or alarm. l This is consistent with actual configuration. d 2.)Correctsdescriptionofdetectorstonotethat indicators and visual / audible high alarms are only l at selected microprocessor locations. l Group: 2 !
| |
| Related SER Section: 12.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes This section of the SER states that the ARMS is de- 'l signed to ... (2) alarm locally and in the control room
| |
| ... to warn of abnormal radiation levels.
| |
| 12.3-51
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies one of the design criteria for the ARMS. ;
| |
| Justification: !
| |
| Criterion 8 modified to state that an operable check !
| |
| source or current is provided for each current. Wile ,
| |
| a check source is located at the detector, a cur 7t is 'l provided remotely. )
| |
| Group: 4 !
| |
| Related SER Section: 12.3.4 i SER/SSER Impact: No !
| |
| 12.3-53
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) i Update discussion regarding RMS computer to reflect j current design.
| |
| Justification: l Deletes "and feed necessary data from Unit 1 and l Unit 2 monitors to the report computer" from the !'
| |
| sentence describing the function of the central consoles. )
| |
| Group: 4 ;
| |
| Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No l I
| |
| 12.3-54
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) {
| |
| Update discussion to reflect the actual design. l Justification: I Deletes "and to the report computer" from the discussion of local electronics.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| | |
| l Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 l' .Page 328 of 439 l
| |
| FSAR Page .
| |
| (as amended) Description 1
| |
| : j. Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| 12.3-55
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Changed wording regarding instrument calibration l Justification:
| |
| Generic calibration instructions may be used to cali-brate different makes/models of instruments with like functions.
| |
| Group: 2 i
| |
| Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 12.3-55
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Addition of information describing power furnished to radiation monitor processors and control display censoles.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Ac'dition complies with response provided to NRC in TXX-
| |
| .89124 regarding questions about chapter 12 of the FSAR.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 12.3.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 12.3-58
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Miscellaneous clarification statements for Section 12.3.4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changed the description of the ARMS control room equip-ment rack to clarify its configuration.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 12.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-60, 63
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Use of Reg. Guidance.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises this section to clearly state that applicable guidance from the referenced documents was followed when designing the area / airborne radiation monitoring system. Paragraphs 1 through 3 were revised to more l clearly state how the guidance in each specific document was used in the system design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-60
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Use of Reg. Guide 8.2 as guidance.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See response 12.3-61, LDCR SA-88-428 item 7.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| | |
| h Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 329 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description j j
| |
| Related SER Section: 12.3.4 1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 12.3-1, 28
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Various corrections to Section 12.3 to match the cur-rent plant configuration.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Description of the shielding around the evaporator is corrected '', note that a 24-inch thick concrete shield is instal'>1. The sentence describing reduction in dose from m lead shield is deleted. Also the reference to removable shielding in 12.3.1.2.8 is deleted.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-30,31 See Page No(s):32,33,34
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Update the discussion on design information on the hot lab and counting rooms.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Several changes have been made to the discussion of ,
| |
| radiation zoning. Wording is changed throughout to l more clearly indicate that the zoning criteria are used as design guidelines. A paragraph is added on page 12.3-31 to further clarify that the radiation zone criteria are used for facility design and not intended for use as operational criteria for posting and establishing access controls. In the detailed discussion of each radiation zone on pages 12.3-31 through 12.3-33, all references to operational requirements for posting and access control have been deleted. Also, the wording is revised to clearly indicate that the zones are design guidelines and that expected radiation levels and occupancy requirements are considered in station design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-31,32 See Page No(s):33
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Miscellaneous clarification statements for Section 12.3 to describe ORE ALARA design features more precisely.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Addition of modifiers to descriptions of radiation zones.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989
| |
| 'Page.330 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description 12.3-42,43
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Various corrections to Section 12.3 to match the current configuration of the plant.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| (1) Deletes discussion of use of ESF atmosphere cleanup units for processing fuel Building Exhaust Air in an accident situation.
| |
| (2) Replace ' deluge' with ' water spray' and
| |
| ' extinguish' with ' suppress' to more accurately reflect the configuration.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 12.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-45,49
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Technical corrections to Section 12.3 to match current plant configuration.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds information noting that Airborne Radioactivity Monitoring System and Area Radiation Monitoring Systems are capable of recording radiation levels for a max-imum period of 28 days.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER notes that ARMS is designed to ... (3) provide a continuous record of radiation levels at key locations throughout the plant. This change says that radiation levels are recorded only up to 28 days.
| |
| 12.3-47,48
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Adds a sentence describing the Wide Range Gas Monitors provided for the plant vent stacks.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-49,53 See Page No(s):54,55
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Miscellaneous clarification statements for Section 12.3.4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| (1) Changed description of type of computer used in the radiation monitoring system to be consistent with rest of the FSAR.
| |
| (2) Changed description of monitor power supply and communication wiring to note that power supply is also field wiring.
| |
| (3) Clarified statement regarding description of re-lated details contained in Section 11.5.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| | |
| L Attachment. to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 331 of 439
| |
| -FSAR Page (as amended) Description Related SER Section: 12.3.4 1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 12.3-55,56 See Page No(s):57
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Justification: i Revises the section on check sources to include a j discussion of area monitor calibrations and source !
| |
| checks.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-55,56 See Page No(s):57,58
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises the section on calibration and maintenance to only discuss maintenance of the system. The discussion of channel calibration was moved to para-graph 5.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-59,60
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revision to discussion of Radiation Monitoring System
| |
| ~
| |
| component accuracies based upon new vendor data.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Change is required to note that for certain accident conditions, the stated accuracy limits may not be achievable, but they do not affect the intended use of the monitor.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 12.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3-60,61
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Clarification of statements in Section 12.3.4 regarding use of ANSI guidelines.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes statements in Sections 12.3.4.1.3 and 12.3.4.4 to note that the guidelines of ANSI N13.1 were con- i sidered during design but that strict adherence to ANSI N13.1 was not intended or achieved.
| |
| Group: 2 '
| |
| Related SER Section: 12.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| .Attachnent to'TXX-89201 May 1, J189 Page 332 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Table 12.3-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Update information on the table to reflect current design.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises the table to more clearly show that.the information presented is used as design criteria.
| |
| Deletes all references to the posting of areas.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 12.3-4, 5 See Sheet No(s):06 thru 23
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Changed Figures 12.3-4 through 12.3-23, inclusively, to provide enhanced legibility and updated details.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| All figures have been cleaned up for legibility pur-poses. Additionally, any one or more of the following items may apply to each drawing:
| |
| o Update to reflect current room numbers and plant layout.
| |
| o Addition of certain radiation monitors not shown in figures accompanying section 7.3.
| |
| o Clarification of radiation zone definitions.
| |
| o Update to reflect as-built shielding installation.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.3 SER/SSER Impact: No l 12.4-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Justification: 1 Adds "as discussed in Section 12.5.3" to the sentence discussing occupancy control in high radiation areas.
| |
| Group: 4 1 Related SER Section: 12.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.5-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Technical support for the RPM.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes the technical support from an advisor to an Assistant RPM (with responsibilities specified in 13.1.3). l l
| |
| Group: 4 l Related SER Section: 12 i SER/SSER Impact: No !
| |
| l l
| |
| 1
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| .May 1, 1989 Page 333 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description 12.5-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Global change to revision of Regulatory Guide 8.8 that governs CPSES design.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Letter TXX-89124 to the NRC reports that Regulatory Guide 8.8, Revision 3, applies to the CPSES design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: Sect. 12 !
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No 12.5-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Global change to revision of Regulatory Guide 8.8 that governs design of CPSES.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Per letter TXX-89124 to the NRC, Regulatory Guide 8.8, Revision 3 is applicable to the CPSES design. ;
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 12.5-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Delete Radwaste Coord title; however, functirs., remain.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Delete title of Radwaste Coordinator; functions remain in the RP section.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.5-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Editorial change to substitute 'RCA' for ' radiation controlled area.
| |
| Group: 4 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.5-4, 5 See Page No(s):06 thru 12
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Update RP program discussion.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| i Major changes have been made to this section to accomplish two objectives:
| |
| (1) Subsections 12.5.2.1 through 12.5.2.5 have been created to better define the types of equipment and facilities being discussed and to consolidate l the discussion of each type / category of equipment.
| |
| i (2) Any references to programmatic or procedural l requirements have been deleted from this section and are moved to the appropriate location in Section 12.5.3, " Programs and Procedures".
| |
| Specific changes to this section will be discussed individually below.
| |
| | |
| l
| |
| -Attachment. to TXX-89201 ,
| |
| May 1, 1989 Page 334 of 439 FSAR Page i
| |
| _(asamended) Description Group: 2 Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER Impact: Yes ,
| |
| SER has not been updated regarding this section since 07/81.
| |
| 12.5-6, 7 See Page No(s):08, 09
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Rewrite of section 12.5.2.2 to ensure flexibility in arrangements of radiation protection and access control facilities.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This change incorporates flexibility in establishing traffic flow routes to and from the RCA so that opera-ting experience can be factored into arrangement chan-ges without requiring an FSAR change.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 12.5-9
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarification of description of Cold Laboratory.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This change: 1.) deletes extraneous equipment from the description, 2.) modifies the description of laboratory use, and 3.) deletes modifier of 'non-radioactive' from chemical testing description to account for the unlikely event that a secondary sample may unknowingly be contaminated because of an undetected primary to secondary leak.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 12.5-11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Deletes the references to Reg. Guide 8.15 and 10 CFR 20.103 referenced in the respiratory protection program.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The commitment to follow the guidance of Reg. Guide 8.15 and to comply with 10 CFR 20.103 pertains to the Respiratory Protection Program and is included in Section 12.5.3 Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 12.5-12, 13 See Page No(s):14 thru 22
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| I Update to RP programs.
| |
| l Justification:
| |
| L Changes the title of this section to " Programs and
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May-1, 1989 Page 335 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Procedures". Additionally, this section has been subdivided into subsections 12.5.3.1 through 12.5.3.7, to consolidate the discussion of each of the major R.P. programmatic areas. Also, the programmatic and procedural discussions and commitments deleted ,
| |
| from Section 12.5.2 are included in the appropriate i location in this section. !
| |
| Individual changes are not explicitly discussed.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER has not been updated for this section since 07/81. l 1
| |
| 12.5-14
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification) j Clarification of Section 12.5.3.1 regarding use of con- l tinuous air monitor (CAM) survey results. !
| |
| Justification: l This change was made to respond to an NRC question on !
| |
| Chapter 12 regarding the location, sensitivity range, and alarm setpoints of CAMS. The response to the NRC is provided in TXX-89124.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 12.5-15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changes " access permit" to " GAP /RWP" in item 4.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No Table 12.5-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises this table to delete types of instrumentation that have been retired from service or that will not be used on a routine basis to support plant operations and add new instrumentation.
| |
| - Combines the two entries for gas proportional counters into a single entry with the number required reduced from 6 to 3.
| |
| - Deletes the entry for scalers. I
| |
| - Deletes the entry for Nal gamma spectroscopy.
| |
| - Reduces the number of HPGE Gamma spectroscopy ;
| |
| detectors from 4 to 3. '
| |
| - Adds entry for personnel contamination / portal-monitors with a required number of 4.
| |
| - Deletes the column listing location of the i equipment.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 12.5
| |
| | |
| - - - - ^ ~ ~ '
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 -
| |
| May 1, 1989 Page 336 of 439 FSAR Page .
| |
| Description (as amended)
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER has not been updated for this section since 07/81.
| |
| Table 12.5-1 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Deletes ancillary data from tables of portable and non-portable radiation monitoring instrumentation. j' Justification:
| |
| Deletes the column identifying the location of non-portable Radiation detection / monitoring equipment, as i this information does not describe type, function or l use of equipment. Locations are also prone to change. '
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 12.5-2 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Minor changes to examples of instrument types, ranges, and required numbers.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 12.5-2 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Deletes ancillary data from tables of portable and non-portable radiation protection instrumentation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes column identifying the location of portable ra-diation detection / monitoring equipment, as this infor-mation does not describe type, function or use of the equipment. Locations are also prone to change. l Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 12.5-2 See Sheet No(s):02 ,
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) i Provides additional information regarding Portable Ra-diation Monitoring Equipment in Table 12.5-2.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Addition of continuous airborne monitors and airborne grab samplers to Table 12.5-2 as part of a response to NRC questions on FSAR Chapter 12. The complete re-sponse is contained in TXX-89124.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 337 of 439 FSAR Page
| |
| -(as amended) Description Table 12.5-1, 2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Deletes ancillary data from tables of portable and non-portable radiation monitoring instrumentation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The entry for Portal Monitor should be deleted from Ta-ble 12.5-2 and added to Table 12.5-1 since it is considered non-portable.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 12.5-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises this figure to reflect current plant design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 12.5-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deletes contaminated laundry storage and sorting from the figure.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 17.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 12.5-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revise Figure 12.5-3 to reflect updated access control facilities and traffic flow patterns.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This change incorporates flexibility in establishing traffic flow routes to and from the RCA so that opera-ting experience can be factored into arrangement chan-ges without requiring an FSAR change.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 12.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 13.1-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Delete reference to multiple owners of CPSES.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This information is discussed in Chapter 1.1 of the FSAR and due to recent changes in ownership status, the discussion in this section is no longer appropriate.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SSER Section: SSER6 13.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The multiple ownership of CPSES is no longer discussed in Chapter 13.
| |
| | |
| l Attachment to TXX-89201 l May-1, 1989 :
| |
| Page 338 of 439 ;
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description 13.1-5, 7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update) i Organizational updates. '
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The responsibility for the Independent Safety Engineer-ing Group transferred from Plant Evaluation Manager to Director, Technical Interface.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 13.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 13.1-7, 8 See Page No(s):09,14-17,24,39-40,46-50,53,56-59,68- 79
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Organization and personnel updates.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Update to reflect current organization and personnel changes.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 13.1-47 See Pag'e No(s):56
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Add qualification criteria for Shift Operations Mgr.
| |
| and minimum crew requirements.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Ensure consistency with recent changes to the T/S.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SSER Section: SSER6 13.1.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The Operations Shift Manager vice the Operations Supv (Manager) is now required to maintain an SR0 license.
| |
| 13.1-48
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) l Expertise on shift.
| |
| Justification: i Revise criteria defining expertise on shift to meet I that specified in 50FR43621, October 28, 1985.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SSER Section: SSER12 13.1.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes Previously, the expertise qualifications were to match those found in NUREG-0737.
| |
| I 13.1-57, 58
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Technical support for the Radiation Protection Mgr.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| To ensure that the Radiation Protection Section has adequate technical depth, the position of Asst Rad.
| |
| Prot. Mgr. was established to assist the RPM.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 13.1.2.1
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 339 of 439 t
| |
| FSAR Page (as amended) Description SER/SSER Impact: Yes The discussion in 13.1.2.1 (pg 15) needs to be updated regarding the title and scope of the Radiation Protection Manager.
| |
| 13.1-59
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| On-shift operating experience.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Add experience qualification criteria for Operations Shift Supvrs (from TXX-4730, 03/19/86 and GL-84-16).
| |
| Group: 3 Related SSER Section: SSER12 13.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 13.1-1
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Organization and personnel updates.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Update to reflect current organization and personnel changes.
| |
| Changed Assistant Shift Supervisor to Unit Supervisor.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 13.1-1 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changed " manager, Operations 0A" to " Director. 0A" to reflect current 0A organization.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 17.2 & 3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No l Table 13.1-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Organization and personnel updates.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changed Assistant Shift Supervisor to Unit Supervisor and C.E. Tech. to Chem. Tech.
| |
| Added note to reference text to clarify STA requirements.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 13.1-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Organization and personnel updates.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Update to reflect current organization and personnel changes, including reorganization of maintenance groups and addition of Assistant Radiation Protection Mgr.
| |
| Group: 3 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| 1 L l l I
| |
| : l. Attachment to TXX-89201 l
| |
| .May 1, 1989 l Page 340 of 439 l
| |
| FSAR Page _
| |
| (as amended) Description 1 13.2-1 See Page No(s):02 thru 26
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revise and update training program to incorporate up-to
| |
| -date stand uds, criteria and guidance.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| l This section has been rewritten to align better with
| |
| ! current standards, criteria and guidance. Additional l changes including more discussion of training for non-licensed personnel.
| |
| Group: 2 Pelated SER Section: 13.2; SSER12 13.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER appears to be consistent; however, some portion appears to be out-of-date and consideration should be given to an updated evaluation.
| |
| 13.4-1 See Page No(s):02. 03, 04 and 08
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Update discussion regarding the ORC and the 50RC.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Update needed to reflect current organization and operating scheme, i.e., 1) SORC members and alternates may meet experience requirements of ANSI N18.1-1971, section 4.4 in lieu of section 4.2;
| |
| : 2) SORC quorum changed from Chairman or Vice Chairman plus 5 members or alternates to plus 4 members or alternates; and,
| |
| : 3) Clarifies that SORC reviews are required where an unreviewed safety question is involved.
| |
| Also commitments: NL-2840, NL-2841 & NL-2843.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 13.4; SSER12 13.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes Evaluation is based on superceded FSAR descriptions and should be considered for update.
| |
| 13.4-5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Update organization responsible for the ISEG.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| ISEG now reports to the Director, Technical Interface.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 13.4; SSER1 13.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER should be updated.
| |
| 13.5-1, 2 See Page No(s):12 and 13
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarify responsibilities with respect to procedure and instructions.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Deleted discussion on out-of-calibration equipment
| |
| | |
| L .
| |
| ' Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1. 1989-Page 341 of 439-
| |
| 'FSAR Page
| |
| -(as amended) Description b since addressed in Chapter 17. Vice President, Nuclear
| |
| ~0perations has overall responsibility. QA now covered by the QA Manual. I&C Manager responsible for.I&C procedures and instructions.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 13.5; SSERI 13.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 13.5-1 See Page No(s): Tables 02, 03, 04, 05, 08 and 09
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Update the tables of operating procedures to reflect' current programs and operating schemes.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Programs and operating schemes have been modified or rebuilt to incorporate new guidance or standards. ;
| |
| Group:. 3 Related SER Section: 13.5; SSER1 13.5 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| .13.5-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)'
| |
| Changed " plant" to " nuclear"'.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changed " plant" to " nuclear" to provide correct name of the Nuclear Operations Department.
| |
| Group: 4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 13.6-1, 2 See Page No(s):04 and 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Change guidance basis from R.G. 1.17 to ANS-3.3 and !
| |
| update organization and program to align with Physical Security Plan (PSP).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Section has been extensively rewritten to incorporate commitment to ANS-3.3 and to be consistent with the l Physical Security Plan. Refer to com reg #NL-2799. I Group: 2 Related SER Section: 13.6; SSER6 13.6 SER/SSER impact: No 14.2-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Reflects organizational changes in the Test Department.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Updates Section 14.2.2.2.2 to reflect organizational changes in the Test Department with the redistribution and clarification of existir.g responsibilities between two Test Department organizations. The position title i for the Lead Startup Engineer has been changed to Assistant Startup Manager, Preoperational Test Program, who will now be solely responsible for the implementation of the Test Program prior to system turnover from the Test Department to Operations and
| |
| | |
| ')
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May.1, 1989 Page 342 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description implementation of the Unit 1 Prestart Test Program.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 14 SER/SSER Impact: No 14.2-6, 7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update)
| |
| Reflects organizational changes in the Test Department.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Updates Section 14.2.2.2.3 to reflect t Janizational changes in the Test Department with the redistribution and clarification of existing responsibilities between two Test Department organizations. The position title 1 of Unit 1 Test Manager has been changed to Assistant '
| |
| Startup Manager, Performance and Test, who will be responsible for the Test Program commencing with the turnover of systems to Operations through commerical operation and the development and implementation of the Initial Startup Test Program.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 14 SER/SSER Impact: No 14.2-23, 33
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Modification of the at power, Mode 1, power distribu-tion measurement commitments to be consistent with the modified power plateaus.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See Justifications for T14.2-3 Sheets 22, 23 and 33. 1 Group: 2 Related SER Section: 14.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 14.2-28
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Editorial correction to the criteria for safe core loading.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Provides editorial correction to the criteria for safe core loading (Item 3) by changing "An anticipated decrease in boron concentration ..." to "An unanticipated decrease in boron concentration ...."
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 14 SER/SSER Impact: No 14.2-35
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies Section 14.2.11 to add the statement that preoperational and initial startup test procedures will be available for examination by HRC regional personnel approximately 60 days prior to the scheduled fuel loading date.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The preoperational and initial startup test procedures
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| 'May 1, 1989 ,
| |
| Page 343 of 439 FSAR Page jasamended) Description will be available for examination by NRC regional personnel approximately 60 days prior to the scheduled performance of the test and "approximately" 60 days prior to the scheduled fuel loading date as required by RG 1.68, Revision 2, Appendix 8 (8/78). The use of the ,
| |
| term "approximately" was agreed upon in previous '
| |
| conversations with the NRC staff.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 14 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER should reflect the requirements of RG 1.68, Rev. 2, App. B (8/78), in that the preoperational and initial startup test procedures will be available for examination approx. 60 days prior te the performance of the test and 60 days prior to scheduled fuel load date.
| |
| Table 14.2-2 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revi.ses Emergency Lighting Systems Test Summary to DC Emergency Lighting Systems Test Summary.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| See Justification for T14.2-2 Sheet 39.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 14 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 14.2-2 See Sheet No(s):15 and 15A
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revises Safety Injection System Hydraulic Performance Test Summary to provide option for RHR pump suction alignment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Revises the Safety injection System Hydraulic Performance Test Summary Test Method Item 3 for the Injection and Recirculation Modes to add the option for aligning the RHR pump suction to the RWST or the RCS hot legs. The purpose of the RHR pump testing is to !
| |
| comfirm that discharge piping resistance is within the ECCS calculation limits. The calculations to determine test acceptance criteria thus incorporate discharge piping reistance, pump total dynamic head and elevation difference assumptions to develop a minimum flow vs suction pressure criteria curve for the injection mode and maximum flow vs suction pressure curves for the recirculation mode. This approach provides a single flow criterion for any combination of suction elevation head and line losses. As a result, either the RWST or the RCS hot legs may be used as the RHR pump suction source during this testing.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 14 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| a w - Attachment . to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989: )
| |
| .Page 344 of 439 {
| |
| FSAR Page
| |
| .;,(as_ amended) ' Description Table 14.'2-2 See Sheet No(s):31-
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies Combustible Gas Control System Test Method.
| |
| Justification: !
| |
| Combustible Gas Control Systems Test Summary, Test' 1 Method Items 1 and 2, have been combined and rewritten to more clearly indicate that equipment operability will be verified.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 14 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 14.2-2 See Sheet No(s):36 and 36a
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies DC Power System Test Summary to address RG-1.68, Appendix A,. Regulatory Position'1.g 4.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| As discussed with the NRC staff on March 1, 1989, the DC Power System Test Summary has been clarified to address RG-1.68, Appendix B, Regulatory Position 1.g.4.
| |
| at CPSES.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 14
| |
| .SER/SSER 1mpact: No l Table 14.2-2 See Sheet No(s):36A
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Correction to battery charger capability description .
| |
| Justification: ;
| |
| Correction made for consistency with FSAR discussion of l Regulatory Guide 1.32 (FSAR page 8.3-42). '
| |
| Group: 2 Related'SER Section: 8.3.2 l SER/SSER Impact: Yes -'
| |
| SER 8.3.2 states that each charger can recharge a completely discharged battery in 24 hours. FSAR states'that each charger is sized to recharge the battery from its design minimum charge state.
| |
| Table 14.2-2 See Sheet No(s):39 I
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) <
| |
| Revises Emergency Lighting Systems Test Summary to I DC Emergency Lighting Systems Test Summary. l Justification: !
| |
| DC Emergency Lighting and 8 hour battery-pack lighting are required in order to meet the Fire Safe Shutdown as described in the CPSES Fire Protection Program (FSAR Section 9.5.1).
| |
| Group: 2 i Related SER Section: 14 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| F-~ .
| |
| L Attachment to TXX-89201.
| |
| May 1, 1989 ,
| |
| l Page 345 of 439 l
| |
| .FSAR Page (as amended) Description l Table 14.2-2 See Sheet No(s):59 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update) l Update ANSI /ANS 56.8-1987 l
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Update to reflect the revision of ANSI /ANS 56.8 i referenced in Appendix J for Mass-Point method. :
| |
| Group: 3 ;
| |
| Related SER Section: 6.2.5 1
| |
| ; SER/SSER Impact: Yes !
| |
| ! SSER 12 references the earlier version of ANSI /ANS 56.8 i l used previously. ;
| |
| Table 14.2-2 See Sheet No(s): 59
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds reference to ILRT methods of ANSI N45.4.
| |
| Justification: l Allows flexibility to perform ILRT using any of the methods in Appendix J (which includes the methods contained in ANSI N45.4).
| |
| Group: 2 l Related SER Section: 6.2.5; SSER12 6.2.5 {
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No l Table 14.2-3 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletion of the Area Radiation Monitoring check against the portable instrumentation during the radiation surveys. 1 Justification:
| |
| See Justification for Table 14.2-3 Sheet 12.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 14 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 14.2-3 See Sheet No(s):03 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) !
| |
| Modification of the Reactor Coolant System Flow Coast- l down Test acceptance criteria.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| FSAR Figure 15.3-9 provides the normalized core coast- !
| |
| down flow vs. time for the four pump coastdown i conditions. The figure provides flow rates which are conservative at each time interval with respect to actual flow rates. The flow coastdown test data and ;
| |
| FSAR Figure 15.3-9 data are not directly comparable because the initial conditions assumed for the loss of Flow FSAR analysis are not the same as those used in the startup test (i.e., the FSAR assumes 100% RTP ;
| |
| whereas the test is conducted at hot standby cond-itions). In addition, the FSAR uses a conservative, normalized generic pump coastdown curve but the test
| |
| | |
| ls LAttachment to.TXX-89201
| |
| '.May~1',.1989
| |
| . PageL 346.- of1439 FSAR Page
| |
| .(as amended) Description measures actual core flow. Westinghouse will provide acceptance criteria for the startup test conditions and actual core flows which correspond.to the initial conditions and core flows assumed in the FSAR analysis.
| |
| This will verify the conservatism of the FSAR analysis.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 14 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| -Table 14.2-3 .SeeSheetNo(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies Rod Position' Indication Test Summary with' the.
| |
| deletion of rod bottom bistables.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Clarifies the test prerequisite item I with the.
| |
| replacement of " operational" with " prepared for operation." Replaces " operational" with " energized"-
| |
| and deletes " including adjustment of the rod-bottom bistables" from prerequisite item 2. The acceptance criteria has been. clarified with the replacement of
| |
| " rod-bottom bistables are correctly set and" with
| |
| " rod-bottom alarms." The Digital Rod Position Indication System does not have rod-bottom bistables.
| |
| r' This'is terminology from an earlier design of the rod position indication system.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 14.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 14.2-3 See Sheet No(s):09 and 10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies Calibration of Process Temperature and Nuclear Instrumentation Test Summary to indicate proper alignment of the source range instrumentation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| l The original wording in test method item 1 described performing a plateau curve on the source range instruments. CPSES's current design includes source range preamps which make a plateau curve meaningless, i
| |
| The neww wording clarifies the proper alignment of the i source range instrumentation. Only selected alarms are l tested during power ascension. All other alarms are ;
| |
| tested in the preoperational test program and the I
| |
| '' surveillance testing.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 14.2 SER/SSER Impact: No y : -: .
| |
| | |
| I
| |
| -J Attachment to TXX-89201 l May-1, 1989 1 l Page'347 of 439 1 1'
| |
| l L FSAR Page (as amended) Description
| |
| ]l '
| |
| Table 14.2-3' See Sheet No(s):12 Li
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision) ]
| |
| Deletion of the Area Radiation Monitoring check against I the portable instrumentation during the radiation i surveys. I Justification: i RG-1.68 Appendix A, paragraph 1.k requires a pre-operational test to demonstrate the proper operation.of the area monitoring equipment. This item is captured in FSAR Table 14.2-2, Sheet 25. RG-1.68 has no similar l item for the area radiation monitors during the power ascension phase.
| |
| See Justification for p. Q&R 423-37. j Group: 2 i Related SER Section: 14 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 14.2-3 See Sheet No(s):15
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Utilization of the " Rod Swap" methodology for Control Bank reactivity worth measurement.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| RG-1.68 Appendix A, paragraph 4.b states: " Measurements .
| |
| {
| |
| of control rod and control rod banks reactivity worths ,
| |
| to (1) ensure that they are in accordance with design .j predictions and (2) confirm by analysis that the .]
| |
| rod insertion limits will be adequate to ensure a shut-down margin consistent with accident analysis assump-tions throughout core life, with the greatest worth rod stuck out of the core." Both the original and revised versions of this test satisfy RG-1.68. The purpose of this revision is to update the FSAR to the correct testing acceptance criteria and to allow additional flexibility in methodology selection. The following provides an itemized justification: 1) The Rod Swap methodology uses the rod worth measurement technique described in WCAP-9863-P-A, " Rod Bank Worth Measurement Utilizing Bank Exchange", May 1982. .This topical report has been reviewed and approved for initial fuel ,
| |
| load and subsequent reload cycles in the SER trans- I mitted to Westinghouse by NRC {{letter dated|date=May 23, 1983|text=letter dated May 23, 1983}} from Cecil 0. Thomas to E. P. Rahe, Jr. 2) The min- {
| |
| l imum boron concentration determination was a carryover '
| |
| from the old (vintage 1975) test methods. The -
| |
| minimum boron concentration provides no meaningful in- j formation for plant operations or as a design verfica- J tion parameter, therefore it is no longer measured per the Westinghouse guideline procedures. 3) Verification of the design by comparing the measurements to like predictions assures the accuracy of the design methods i and assumptions and thus the adequacy of the required !
| |
| Shutdown Margin and Safety Analysis. Review criteria l
| |
| 1 j
| |
| | |
| ~
| |
| , 'Attachmebt 'to:TXX-89201-May 1, 1989 j
| |
| :Page.348 of 439 !
| |
| FSAR Page.
| |
| Description
| |
| ~
| |
| -(as amended) are imposed on each RCCA bank measured and an accep-tance criteria is imposed on the sum of all of the banks measured, per WCAP-9863-P-A.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 14 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| . Table 14.2-3 See Sheet No(s):18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Clarifies initiation of Loss of Offsite Power Test.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| , A design change to the AC electrical distribution system of CPSES has made the existing test description incorrect. . Emergency loads can no longer be supplied C
| |
| by the unit auxiliary transformer. As a result, the-loss of offsite power test will be initiated by manually generating coincident. lockouts on the offsite. ,
| |
| [
| |
| , power sources and the main generator output. '
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 14.2 l SER/SSER Impact: No Table 14.2-3' See Sheet No(s):19
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Elimination of the Cold Full-Flow-and Cold No-Flow rod drop timing tests.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| RG-1.68 Appendix A, paragraph 2.b states "... to the extent practical, testing should demonstrate control p rod scram times both at hot zero power and cold tem-E perature conditions, with flow and no-flow conditions in the reactor coolant system as required to' bound con-ditions under which scram might be required." For CPSES, by Technical Specifications, critical operations are only permitted with the plant hot and reactor cool- i ant pumps operating. Also the Technical Specifications require only hot full flow testing. The primary reason such testing is performed for PWRs is to exercise the '
| |
| rods and to provide early detection of problems in'the ;
| |
| rod mechanical system prior to plant heatup. Since the 1 operability'of the Rod Position Indication System and the Rod Drive System are tested prior to plant heatup, the intent of the cold drop tests is met by these other actions. Data from Catawba Units 1 & 2, and Farley !
| |
| Units 1 & 2 were reviewed and the cold rod drop time tests did not provide information unique and different i than the results at the hot full flow condition. Fur- j thermore, this data shows that the Rod Drop Tests per-formed in the hot full flow condition are sufficient to detect any system problems. TV Electric considers the likelihood of a problem requiring a plant cool down for i repair which is not detected prior to plant heatup to l l
| |
| _ ______ ------ _ _-_ -- - _ _ - - - - _ - - - - - - -- -- -- )
| |
| | |
| (
| |
| w Attachment to TXX-89201
| |
| , May?1, 1989
| |
| -Pagel349 of.439-FSAR Page (as-amended) Description be acceptably low. The change from six additional .
| |
| drops to at least three additional drops.on those rods, whose measured drop times deviate from the mean by more than two standard deviations is to make the FSAR consistent with the test procedure and.RG-1.68.
| |
| RG-1.68 Appendix A, paragraph 2.b recommends that at least three additional drop time measurements be made on those rods whose drop: times deviate from the mean by;.
| |
| more than two standard deviations. Three additional measurements are sufficient to verify the validity of the initial measurement. This number is also. sufficient i to determine that the deviating rods are consistent or !
| |
| to demonstrate improvement. ,
| |
| Group: 2 '!
| |
| Related SER Section: 14.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 14.2-3 See Sheet No(s):20 and 21
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Modification of the low power, Mode 2, power
| |
| -distribution measurement commitments to be consistent with the " Rod Swap" program.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| FSAR Table 14.2-3, Sheet 20 and the response to NRC Question 423.16 Item 6 are revised to: 1) Allow the use of more sensitive equipment to augment the installed plant equipment by revising the power level at "below 5% power". 2) Perform the measurement at only the "All Rods Out (AR0)" condition (i.e., delete the tests at the " Control Bank 0 inserted" and the " Control Banks D, C, B at the hot zero power insertion limit" config-urations). Justification 1: The previous power level of 3-5% RTP for the flux distribution measurement is cor-rect if the installed plant equipment is not augmented with more sensitive equipment. The utilization of more sensitive equipment will allow the measurement to oc-cur as low as the "Zero Power Testing Range". Perform-ing the measurement at this power level is consistent with RG-1.68 Appendix A, paragraph 4.e. Justification 2: RG-1.68 Appendix A, paragraph 4.e requirement to determine flux distribution, is best performed in the AR0 condition where the insertion of Control Rods does not interfere with the measurement / prediction relation-ship. Additional measurements at different rod pos-itions were performed in conjuction with the control rod worth measurements when these configurations were achieved during the testing process. These data were primarily used to aid the fuel designer in the resolut-ion of a mesurement criteria failure. In previous plant startups when a significant criteria failure occurred, the AR0 flux distribution was repeated to augment the other measurements,' where the other information was
| |
| ____.._j
| |
| | |
| Attachment ~ to TXX-89201- 4 May.1, 1989.-
| |
| , -Page 350 of-439 L FSAR Page
| |
| ,'' (as amended) Description generally not used. Since Rod Swap method is planned for CPSES, configurations of " Control D inserted" and
| |
| " Control Banks 0, C, B at the hot zero power' insertion limit" will not be achieved. Sufficient information l will be gathered from'the performance of the bank worths via Rod Swap, with corresponding comparisons of measured vs. predicted bank positions, to. verify'the
| |
| . adequacy of the design models. Therefore, in' light of-the limited value of this additional information, CPSES will-only perform additional Flux Distribution Measure-ments at the recommendation of.the NSSS Vendor.
| |
| -Group: 2 F
| |
| Related SER Section: 14.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 14.2-3 See Sheet No(s):22
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Deletion of flux maps at 30% and 90% power.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The core performance data that could be obtained at 30%
| |
| RTP is utilized for gross calibration adjustments of the Nuclear ' Instrumentation System (NIS) prior to power escalation to 50% RTP. This activity will'be performed at 25-30% RTP as a hold prior to escalation to 50t RTP -
| |
| The flux distribution measurement at 30% RTP will not be performed unless the peaking factors measured at low power do not support escalation to~70% RTP, the NIS trip setpoint for the 50% RTP.. testing plateau. This is per the direction of RG-1.68 Appendix C, paragraph 4.h.
| |
| The core performance data at 90% RTP is typically ob-tained for'a calibration check of the NIS and Process Temperature' Instrumentation Systems prior to power es-calation to 100% RTP. The flux distribution measure-ment at 90% RTP will not be performed unless the peak-ing factors measured at 75% RTP do not support escala-tion to 100% RTP per RG-1.68 Appendix C, paragraph 4.h.
| |
| Although testing at 90% is not required by RG 1.68, re-cording of the RCS parameters will be performed at 90%
| |
| RTP as a hold point prior to escalation to 100% RTP.
| |
| The reference to abnormal rod configurations in the .
| |
| acceptance criteria is based on performing the pseudo l rod ejection and drop test at 30% and 50% RTP, respec-tively. These test were deleted in a previous FSAR amendment but the reference in this section was inadvertently retained.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 14.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 351 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Table 14.2-3 See Sheet No(s):23
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Revised to change the 30% RTP test to 50% RTP and to be consistent with the modified power plateaus.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The unit load transient at 30% RTP was intended to be a precursor to the same transient test for higher power levels, and the 50% load rejection transients. However.
| |
| a load change transient at 30% RTP does not provide useful predictions about whether ecceptable control system performance wouldo ' e obtained at the higher power levels. A step load decrease from 30% RTP results in the main feedwater control valves trying to operate at the lower acceptable end of their operating range, leading to poor control s Making con-trol system adjustments (ystem response.especially to steam level control) to address the operating concerns at.30%
| |
| RTP has a high probability of causing more significant control problems at the higher power levels. The step load change transient would first be performed at the 50% RTP plateau instead of 30% RTP. Performing this test again at 75% RTP does not result in additional in-formation, as the control system responses (i.e., par-ameter variations from initial conditions and control-ler stability) are very similar for a step change tran-sient initiated from either 50% or 75% RTP. The 50%
| |
| RTP plateau is high enough to allow for control system adjustments (largely in steam generator level control) that would still result in acceptable performache at higher power level. The step load transient at 75% RTP also results in a smoother response than the same test at 50% RTP for the following reasons: 1) The moderator temperature coefficient is more negative at.the higher power levels, resulting in smoother and more stable reactor power and temperature control. 2) Feedwater temperature is higher at the higher power level, which acts as a damping effect for steam generator level con-trol. The succesful performance of this test at 50% and 100% RTP will bound the information at 75% RTP and ver-ifies the proper operation over the operating range of interest. In addition, the dynamic response of the plant is tested at 75% RTP by performing a 50% load reduction test. This testing provides adequate con-fidence that the 10% load swing at 75% RTP need not be perfonned .
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 14.2 l SER/SSER Impact: No l
| |
| 1
| |
| | |
| Attachment. to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 ,
| |
| Page 352 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Table 14.2-3 See Sheet No(s):25
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Modification of the Remote Shutdown test to take credit for the cooldown portion being performed during the Hot Functional Testing per RG 1.68.2 Justification:
| |
| RG-1.68.2, Revision 1, paragraph C.4 states: "The de-monstration of cold shutdown capability need not neces-sarily be perfonned immediately following the demon-stration of achieving and maintaining safe hot standby from outside the control room. Rather, this cooldown portion of the test may be combined with another start-up test requiring the reactor to be cooled down, as long as the procedures and acceptance criteria for the combined test meet all the elements of each individual test." The cooldown, from 557 to 300 Deg-F, can pro-perly be demonstrated during the HFT program, or the ISU program when the prerequisites are satisfied. There are several tests currently planned during the HFT and ISU programs which meet the prerequisites and have the need to establish cold shutdown conditions following the test. The remote shutdown cooldown demonstration will be performed following one of these tests.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 14.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 14.2-3 See Sheet No(s):33
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Modification of the Automatic Reactor Control System tests to be consistent with the modified power plateaus and to delete the 75% test.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The Automatic Reactor Control System test is intended as a precursor to the Unit Load Transient test and is performed at 30% RTP. It is designed to ensure that the automatic rod control system can restore the Reactor Coolant System (RCS) temperature to within + or
| |
| - 1.5 Deg-F deadband of the referenced temperature.
| |
| Prior to 50% RTP, proper operation of this function would be demonstrated by observation during normal power escalation. The Westinghouse NSSS startup guide-line procedures only schedule this test at the 304 RTP plateau. The performance of this test at 50% RTP is consistent with the intention of these procedures and i has been recongnized by Westinghouse as an improvement for control system adjustment at CPSES. The test at 75%
| |
| RTP is considered redundant to the 50% RTP test, there-fore this test is deleted.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 14.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 353 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Figure 14.2-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Modified to revise test plateaus.
| |
| Group: 2 Related STR Section: 14.2 SER/SSER Impact: No l 15.0-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| L Modifies this section by referring the reader to FSAR I
| |
| Section 15.0.8, Plant Systems and Components Available for Mitigation of Accident Effects and deletes the word "only" to make it clear that accident mitigation does not always rely on seismic Category I, Class 1E eqpt.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This change is made to clarify the phrase " ultimate mitigation" so as to avoid the. interpretation that only.
| |
| seismic Category 1, Class IE qualified equipment is used in accident mitigation.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.0-6, 7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes from the list of ANS Condition II Faults the event involving a break in an instrument line or other lines from the reactor coolant pressure boundary that penetrate the containment, and adds it to the list of Condition 111 faults.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| For CPSES this fault represents a Condition III event and, as such, uses Condition III acceptance criteria.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 15.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.0-10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Modifies the steady-state errors associated with pressurizer pressure, as used in transient analysis.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changed to reflect the error band used in the analysis.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes Section 15.1.1 of the SER needs to be revised to incorporate this change.
| |
| Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Modifies the entry for the assumed Doppler coefficient for the Excessive increase in Secondary Steam flow event.
| |
| )
| |
| u_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ <
| |
| | |
| L Attachment' to TXX-89201L May 1, 1989
| |
| .Page=354 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Justification:
| |
| The change' achieves consistency with the actual analy-sis procedures.
| |
| Group: 2 o Related SER Section: 15.2.1-SER/SSER-Impact: No Table 15.0-2 See_ Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| .(Correction)
| |
| For the ' Inadvertent Opening of a Steam Generator Relief-or Safety Valve event, changes,the Doppler coefficient by adding a reference.to Figure 15.1-14,.and uses a value.of -2.9 pcm/ degree F (vs. -2.2 pcm/ degree F).
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the current accident analysis assumptions.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 15.2.1 SER/bSER Impact: No Table 15.0-2 .See Sheet No(s).:01 thru 05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Deletes the superscript "a" used with the heading
| |
| " Reactivity Coefficients" and rearranges the heading-
| |
| " Reactivity Coefficients Assumed".
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The superscript is meant to apply only to the Doppler coefficient; the heading was intended to apply to the Doppler as well as the moderator coefficients.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):01, 02, 04, 05; F15.0-6; pg. 15.3-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| For the analysis of certain events, the assumed moderator density coefficient is "0.0" rather than referring to " Figure 15.0-6".
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Figure 15.0-6 is no longer used in the analysis of system events; the Table (and other cited locations) reflects the correct value used in the analyses.
| |
| Group: _2 Related SER Section: 15.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Editorial)
| |
| Reverses the order of the listing of the Doppler coeff-icients for the Loss of External Electrical Load and/or Turbine Trip event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 355 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description The change is made so that the order of the entries is consistent with that for other cases, as applicable.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| The assumed moderator density coefficient for three fault conditions is changed from a reference to Figure 15.0-6 to "0.0" delta k/gm/cc.
| |
| > Justification:
| |
| Figure 15.0-6 has been deleted since it is no longer used in the analysis; the 0.0 value reflects what is used in the current analysis.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER.Section: 15.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Reference to Figure 15.1-11 is deleted.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This Figure is no longer used in the analysis.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.3.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes the moderator density coefficient to "0.0" delta k/gm/cc for both the Uncontrolled RCCA Bank With-drawal event from a Subcritical or low Power Startup Condition and the Uncontrolled RCCA Bank Withdrawal at Power event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This change reflects the current accident analysis assumptions.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes the entry for the Doppler coefficient for the Uncontrolled RCCA Bank Withdrawal event from a Sub-critical or low Power Startup Condition to " Defect 1 %
| |
| delta rho".
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects current accident analysis assump-tions for this event.
| |
| Group: 3
| |
| | |
| Attachment. Ao TXX-89201-
| |
| .May 1, 1989 Page 356'of 439 FSAR Page i
| |
| '(as amended) Description j Related SER Section: 15.1.1 !
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No !
| |
| Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):03 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) i Changes the entries for the moderator' density and ;
| |
| ' Doppler' coefficients used in the analysis of the RCCA l Misalignment event. 1 Justification: .
| |
| 1 Reference to section 15.4.3 more adequately describes j the method of treatment of these coefficients in the i analysis. !
| |
| . Group: 2 i Related SER Section:-15.1.1- )
| |
| SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ]
| |
| Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):03 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) !
| |
| Incorporates three assumed initial NSS thermal power 1 output values (102 %, 62 % and Ic % of rated power)
| |
| .used in the analysis of the Uncontrolled RCCA Bank :l Withdrawal at Power Condition event, j Justification: .
| |
| The change reflects the initial power level values used {
| |
| in the analysis; they accomodate the 2 % allowance in !
| |
| core power for calorimetric error (see FSAR section i 15.0.3.2). l Group: 3 ')
| |
| Related SER Section: 15.1.1 l SER/SSER Impact: No. 'j i
| |
| Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):03 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Update) l Deletes reference to use of the THINC and LEOPARD Codes i in the analysis of the RCCA Misalignment condition. l l Justification: j The change reflects the use of a revised methodology i
| |
| for the analysis of the inadvertent Loading of a Fuel Assembly in an Improper Position.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.2.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No I
| |
| ' Table 15.0-2 SeeSheetNo(s):03
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Deletes the entire entry for the analysis of the Start- !
| |
| up of an Inactive Reactor Coolant Loop at an Incorrect Temperature event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the fact that CPSES technical spec-ifications require all four reactor coolant loops to be in operation when the plant is in Modes 1 or 2.
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 357 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):03; pg. 15.3-2 to 4, 7, 8, 10, 14
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Deletes varicus initial thermal power levels used in certain analyses that are assumed to start with only three reactor coolant loops operating; in some cases the entire event is deleted from consideration.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the fact that CPSES technical spec-ifications require all four reactor coolant loops to be in operation when the plant is in Modes 1 or 2.
| |
| 'The analyzed events that are affected are the Partial &
| |
| Complete loss of Reactor Coolant Flow, Reactor Coolant Pump Shaf t Seizure (Locked Rotor), and Startup of an inactive Coolant Loop at an Incorrect Temperature.
| |
| Other FSAR pages that are affected are Table 15.3-1 (sh. 1 & 2), Table 15.3-2 and Figures 15.3-5 to 8, 13 to 16 and 21 to 24.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Deletes reference to the use of the LEOPARD and TURTLE Codes in the analysis of the Inadvertent Loading of a Fuel Assembly in an Improper Position event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects use of a revised methodology for analysis of the inadvertent L0ading of a Fuel Assembly in an Improper Position event.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| For the inadvertent Operation of the ECCS during Power Operation condition, changes the assumed moderator density coefficient to "0.0" delta k/gm/cc.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Figure 15.0-6 has been deleted since it is no longer used in the analysis of the Inadvertent Operation of the ECCS during Power Operation condition; the Table reflects the correct value used in the analysis.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| la <
| |
| . Attachment to TXX-89201'
| |
| . May 1, 1989 Page 358 of 439 FSAR Page . . l (as amended) Description i i
| |
| Table 15.0-2.- See Sheet No(s):04 l
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction) i Deletes the assumed NSS thermal. power entry for the Chemical and Volume Control. System malfunction event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the fact that the results of the analysis of the CVCS malfunction event are dependent on reactivity effects rather than power generation.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.2.3.1 L SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.0-2 SeeSheetNo(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| For the Inadvertent Opening of a Pressurizer Safety or Relief Valve condition,_ changes the assumed moderator density coefficient to "0.0" delta k/gm/cc.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Changed because Figure 15.0-6 has-been deleted ~since it is no longer used in the analysis 'of the Inadvertent Opening of a Pressurizer Safety or Relief Valve event;.
| |
| the "0.0" value reflects what is used in the analysis.
| |
| . Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.0-2 See Sheet No(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Adds a clarifying note that the 3579 MWt value assumed for the initial NSS power output is used in the analy-sis of the small break LOCA.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change indicates that the 3579 MWt value relates solely to the initial condition for the small break LOCA.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.3.8 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.0-2 .See Sheet No(s):05
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) l Adds the value (3411 MWt) for the assumed initial thermal power output used in the analysis of the large break LOCA and a clarifying footnote.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The charge reflects the assumption used in the current analysis of the large break LOCA.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 15.1.1 a_-__m__m_.__.___-____.-.m_______-._-- _ _.._.--__ _ __.____.-____m___.m___._____-._..-_-_-__-.-___..._._____.-__________-_.______-__m_____.__-________-_.________________._____.____..-_-._-_m__-_,___.._J
| |
| | |
| ~
| |
| Attachment. to TXX-89201 L ~ May:1, 1989 Page 359fof 439
| |
| - FSAR Page
| |
| ' (as amended) Description
| |
| < SER/SSER Impact: Yes Section 15.1.1 should be revised to clarify that the value of the maximum capacity of the steam and power
| |
| . conversion system, i. e., 3579 MWt,'was not used, in particular, in the analysis of the.large break LOCA L (rather, the core thermal power of 3411 MWt was used).
| |
| ' Table 15.0-4 See Sheet No(s) 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| '(Correction)
| |
| Deletes the Table footnote that indicated the use of a different limiting setpoint for low-low steam generator water level for the analysis .of the-Loss of Nonnal Feedwater Flow event and the Feedwater System Pipe Break event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This deletion reflects the fact that the revised analy-ses of these events use a consistent value for the low-low steam generator water level trip setpoint.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.0-4 See Sheet No(s):02 and 032-131
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Modifies the text and table to indicate the value of-the revised limiting trip point (0 "s of narrow range level span for both units) used in safety analysis of the Loss of Nonemergency AC Power, Loss of Normal feed-water Flow and Feedwater System Pipe Break events.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This change is made to justify use of a lower tech spec value for the low-low steam generator water level trip setpoint.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.2.2
| |
| 'SER/SSER impact: No
| |
| - Table'15.0-6 See Sheet No(s):01
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deleter the Hi-1 containmen* oressure f rom the list of -
| |
| ESF E <.uation Functions available to respond to the Inadvertent Opening of a Steam Generator Relief or Safety Valve event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This change is made to reflect the fact that, in the CPSES design, the steam generator relief and safety valves are located outside the containment.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 15.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No i
| |
| -__----_,-__m-_--------,--- _ , - - - - --a------_
| |
| | |
| l Attachment to TXX-89201 ,
| |
| 'May 1, 1989 '
| |
| Page 360 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description !
| |
| Table 15.0-6 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Modifies the list of reactor trip functions available for the CVCS malfuntion event and for the spectrum of RCCA ejection accidents so as to include the power range low flux trip.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the current CPSES design.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 15.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The list of reactor trips included in section 15.1.1 should be revised to include the power range low flux trip.
| |
| Table 15.0-6 See Sheet No(s):04
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Modifies the list of "Other Equipment" available for the CVCS malfunction incident to include the Boron Dilution Mitigation System.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the current CPSES design.
| |
| Group: 3 ~
| |
| Related SER Section: 15.2.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.0-6
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes Figure 15.0-6, " Minimum Moderator Density Coefficient Used in Analysis" since other values are now used.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Figure 15.0-6 is no longer used to obtain the value of the moderator density coefficient for accident analy-sis.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.1.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.0-20
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Modifies the sequence of events diagram (Figure 15.0-20) for boron dilution by adding inputs from the Source Range Doubling Alarm and the delta 1 alarms; also, makes other changes to be consistent with current plant design and operating procedures.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the actual instrumentation provid-ing information to the operator in the event of a boron i dilution incident;.it automatically initiates valve movements to terminate dilution and initiate boration.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 15.2.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| ==Attachment:==
| |
| .to TXX-89201 May.1,.1989-Page 361 of'439-i
| |
| 'FSAR Page l (as' amended)' Description l-Figure 15.0-26 See Sheet No(s):pg. 7.6-31 and 15.6-5, T212.68-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes the source of the main control board alarm signal,that alerts'the operators to a break in the.
| |
| Chemical and Volume Control System (CVCS) letdown line outside containment.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This change reflects the fact that, in the current CPSES design, this signal is derived from two pressure switches located in the CVCS letdown line outside con-tainment,,rather than from a vent monitor located in the-Safeguards Building.
| |
| Group: 3:
| |
| Related SER Section: 15.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER, in Section 15.4.3 (pg. 15-17), should-be revised to reflect the new source of the alarm signal used to alert the operators to the existence of a break in the CVCS letdown line outside containment.
| |
| Figure 15.0-27, 29 See Sheet No(s):F15.0-30
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Changes the sequence of events diagrams for the Gas Decay Tank Rupture and ior the Fuel Handling Accident in both the Fuel Handling Building and the Containment to show an unfiltered release;- for the Gas Decay Tank Rupture also deletes the operator action.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These changes are made to be consistent with the current accident analyses for these three events.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 15.4.6; SSER2 15.4.8 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.1-16, 22
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes a sentence from the lists of conditions assumed to exist at the time of both the secondary system steam release that results from the Inadvertent Opening of a Steam Generator Relief or Safety Valve and the Main Steam Line Break events.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The deleted sentence is no longer applicable given the current analysis methodology.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No ,
| |
| i
| |
| | |
| I Attachment .to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 362 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description 15.1-22
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition) l Adds a sentence referring to Figure 15.1-14 to indicate that it shows the Doppler only power defect used in the analysis of both the Inadvertent Opening of a Steam Generator Relief or Safety Valve and the Steam System Piping Failure events.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change clarifies that the Figure depir s the Doppler only power defect as used in the ..vo analyses.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.1-11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes Figure 15.1-11 "k(eff) versus Temperature" Justification:
| |
| Figure 15.1-11 is no longer applicable given the current analysis methodology.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.2-17 See Page No(s):T15.2-1, sh. 5
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Modifies several of the assumptions used in the analy-sis of the Loss of Nonemergency AC Power to Station Auxiliaries event involving auxiliary feedwater flow rates, pump flow capabilities and feedline backpressure for the pump flow.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These changes are made to be consistent with the re-
| |
| , vised accident analysis for the Loss of Nonemergency AC l Power to Station Auxiliaries event to justify a lower tech spec value for the low-low steam generator water level trip setpoint.
| |
| Group: 2 l Related SER Section: 15.2.2 l SER/SSER Impact: No I
| |
| l 15.2-18
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes one of the assumptions used in the analysis of the loss of Nonemergency Power to Station Auxiliaries event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the fact that the assumption is no longer applicable in the revised analysis.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| .Related SER Section: 15.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 1
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 1 May-1, 1989 Page'363 of 439 .
| |
| FSAR Page~ j (as amended) Description d 15.2-21,.24~ 'See Page No(s):T15.2-1, sh. 6
| |
| -Description: (Revision)
| |
| Modifies.one of the assumptions used in the analysis of the Loss of Normal Feedwater Flow event to indicate that 860 gpm of auxiliary feedwater'is delivered to four steam generators against.a steamline backpressure of 1236 psia.
| |
| . Justification:
| |
| This change.is made to be consistent with the revised accident analysis for the Loss of Normal Feedwater Flow ~
| |
| event that justifies a lower tech spec value for the.
| |
| Iow-low steam generator water level trip setpoint.
| |
| Group:~2 Related SER Section: 15.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 15'.2-23
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Modifies the text to clarify the. conservatism used in the analysis of the loss of Normal Feedwater. Flow event relating to the nature of the Unit I low-low steam generator water level trip setpoint.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This'' change is made in order to clarify the'conser-vatism in the analysis of the Loss of Normal Feedwater Flow event and its applicability to both units.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Sect. ion: 15.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.2-23
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes a paragraph from the text discussing the results of the previous analysis of the Loss of Normal Feedwater Flow event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This deletion reflects the fact that identical (vs.
| |
| different) auxiliary feedwater flow rates were used for the revised analyses of both the Loss of Nonemergency AC Power event and'the Loss of Normal Feedwater Flow event.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| ~15.2-30
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Modifies one of the assumptions used in the analysis of the Feedwater System Pipe Break event to indicate that failure of the turbine-driven AFW pump is considered to be the worst single active failure and that the AFW is delivered against a 1236 psia steamline backpressure.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These changes are made to be consistent with the assumptions used in the revised analysis of the Feed-
| |
| . . . . i
| |
| | |
| LAttachment to TXX-39201 Mayil, 1989-Page 364.of'439 FSAR Page-
| |
| .(as-amended). Description water System Pipe Break event.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.3.6 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| -15.2-30
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| -(Clarification)
| |
| Modifies a portion of one of the assumptions used in the anal.ysis of the Feedwater System Pipe Break event regarding the time required to purge the feedwater L lines prior to entry of the auxiliary feedwater.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change is made to reflect the difference between-the' assumed and calculated values.
| |
| Group: 4 _
| |
| !. Related SER Section: 15.3.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.2-30
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Modifies a portion of one of the assumptions used in the analysis of the Feedwater System Pipe Break event regarding the assumed time required to purge the feed-1- water lines before entry of auxiliary feedwater.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The chang'e is niade to reflect. the fact that the calcu-lated time supports the assuned value.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.3.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.2-32
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Modifies one of the actions to be taken by the oper-ators .following a secondary system line rupture.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change is made to be consistent with the current CPSES Emergency Response Guidelines as reflected in the plant Emergency Operating Procedures.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.3.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 15.2-35
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Modifies the text discussing the results of the analy-sis of the Feedwater System Pipe Break event to indi-cate that water relief occurs through the pressurizer safety valves only with uffsite power available and reactor coolant makeup is provided by the 51 system.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This channge reflects the results of the revised analy-sis of the Feedwater System Pipe Break event.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 15.3.6 SER/SSER Impact: No
| |
| | |
| a '
| |
| Attachments to'TXX-89201 L .Mayl1, 1989 LPage 365 of 439-m, FSAR Page-D (as amended)- ' Description
| |
| -Table 15~.2 See Sheet No(s):05 thru 09
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Modifies the Table to reflect the results of the re-vised analyses for the loss of Nonemergency AC Power, Loss of Normal-Feedwater Flow and Feedwater System Pipe Break events.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These changes are made to report the results of the
| |
| ..- revised analyses for these events and to justify the i lower tech spec value for the low-low steam generator r water level trip setpoint.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 15.2.2' SER/SSER Impact: ~ No 1 Table 15.2-1~ See Sheet No(s):06 and 09
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes Note 2 of the Table for the Loss of Normal Feedwater Flow event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| This change is made since the note is no longer applic-able for the revised analysis of the Loss of Normal '
| |
| * Feedwater Flow event.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 15.2.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 15.2-9, 10 See Sheet No(s):11 thru 26A
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Revision)
| |
| Changes the figures depicting the transient response of-certain plant parameters in the Loss of Nonemergency AC Power to Station _ Auxiliaries event, the Loss of Normal Feedwater Flow event and the Feedwater System Pipe Break event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| These changes reflect the results of the revised analy-ses of these events using, among other assumptions, the revised low-low steam generator water level setpoint to justify the lower tech spec setpoint value.
| |
| Group: 2 :
| |
| Related SER Section: 15.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: Na 15.3-3
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes reference to Figure 15.0-6 for the minimum moderator dansity coefficient to be used in the analy-sis of the Partial Loss of Forced Reactor Coolant Flow event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Figure 15.0-6 is no longer used in this analysis.
| |
| Group: 2
| |
| | |
| ' Attachment- to TXX-89201'
| |
| 'May.1, 1989 L Page 366 of 439-FSAR Page (as amended) Description l Related SER Section: 15.1.1 l SER/SSER Impact: No {
| |
| 15.3-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Modifies the normalization factor applied to the curve i of. reactivity insertion vs. time (Figure'15.0-5) used in the. analysis of the Partial Loss of Forced Reactor f Coolant Flow event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the current analysis assumption, which is supported by test results..
| |
| Group:-3 Related SER Section: 15.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.3-4
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Deletes 'a paragraph referring to Figures 15.3-5 to 8, which..show the plant transient response for the Partial loss of Forced Reactor Coolant Flow event initiated when three reactor coolant loops are in operation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the fact that CPSES technical spec-ifications require all four reactor coolant. loops to be in operation when the plant is in Modes 1 or 2.
| |
| Group: 4 .
| |
| Related SER Section: 15.2.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 15.3-8
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Deletes several sentences and phrases dealing with the analysis of the Complete Loss of Forced Reactor Coolant Flow event for the case initiated with only three reactor coolant loops in operation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the fact that CPSES technical spec-ifications require all four reactor coolant loops to be in operation when the plant is in Modes 1 or 2.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.3-14 See Page No(s): Table 15.3-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Deletes the section discussing the results of the an-alysis of the Locked Rotor event for the case that is initiated with only three reactor coolant loops in operation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the fact that CPSES technical spec-ifications require all four reactor coolant loops to be in operation when the plant is in Modes 1 or 2.
| |
| Group: 4
| |
| | |
| l Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 367 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description Related SER Section: 15.3.7 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.3-2, 3, 7, 10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Deletes that portion of the text indicating there are
| |
| ; two cases analyzed (i. e., both three and four loop operation) for the Partial and Complete Loss of Forced Reactot Coolant Flow events and for the Locked Rotor event.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the fact that CPSES technical spec-ifications require all four reactor coolant loops to be in operation when the plant is in Modes 1 or 2.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.3-3, 10
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Deletes the sentence specifying the maximum power level to be used in the analysis of both the Partial Loss of Forced Reactor Coolant Flow event and the Locked Rotor event, for the cases which start with three reactor coolant loops operating. '
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the fact that CPSES technical spec-ifications require all four reactor coolant loops to be in operation when the plant is in Modes 1 or 2.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.3-1 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Deletes all results-generated time sequence of events entries listed under headings involving three loop operation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the fact that CPSES technical spec-ifications require all four reactor coolant loops to be in operation when the plant is in Modes 1 or 2.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 15.3-5, 6, 7, 8 See Sheet No(s):13 to 16, 21 to 24; p 15.3-4, 08, 14
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Deletes Figures 15.3-5 to 8, 13 to 16 and 21 to 24, which depict the response of certain plant parameters to a number of accidents that start with only three reactor coolant loops in operation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the fact that CPSES technical spec-
| |
| | |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 May 1, 1989 Page 368 of 439 FSAR Page (as amended) Description ifications require all four reactor coolant loops to be in operation when the plant is in Modes 1 or 2.
| |
| The accidents involved are the Partial and Complete loss of Forced Reactor Coolant Flow events'and the Reactor Coolant Pump Shaf t Seizure (Locked Rotor) event.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.3.7 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.4-2
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Modifies the statement indicating the manner in which the uncontrolled RCCA bank withdrawal event from a subcritical or low power condition could be initiated to include operator initiation.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Operator action is a second means by which this event could be initiated.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.2.3.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| ~
| |
| 15.4-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Change deletes discussion of part length control rods.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| CPSES does not use part length control rods.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 4.3.2.3; SSERO 4.3.2.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 15.4-7
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)
| |
| Deletes an incorrect statement concerning neutron flux transient behavior as a result of the uncontrolled RCCA withdrawal event from a subcritical or low power start-up condition.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| Results of the current analysis of this event invali-date the statement in question.
| |
| Group: 2 Related SER Section: 15.2.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.4-11
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Addition)
| |
| Adds a paragraph indicating that, for the Uncontrolled RCCA Bank Withdrawal at Power event, three different initial operating power levels were analyzed.
| |
| Justification:
| |
| The change reflects the actual analysis cases that were performed.
| |
| Group: 3 Related SER Section: 15.3.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No
| |
| | |
| I I
| |
| Attachment to TXX-89201 .l May 1, 1989 -
| |
| Page 369 of 439 I
| |
| FSAR Page l (as amended) Description )
| |
| 15.4-12
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Clarification)
| |
| Deletes a sentence that provided a comparison of the maximum positive reactivity insertion rate used in the analysis of the Uncontrolled RCCA Bank Withdrawal at Power event with that associated with withdrawal of a part length RCCA.
| |
| Justification: l The change is consistent with the fact that the CPSES design does not utilize part length RCCAs.
| |
| Group: 4 Related SER Section: 15.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.4-13 See Page No(s): Figures 15.4-10 t'hru 12
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| (Correction)}}
| |
