ML24109A191: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML24109A191
| number = ML24109A191
| issue date = 05/28/2024
| issue date = 05/28/2024
| title = Memo to Mrome Re Shpo Meeting on March 20 2024 Public
| title = Memo to Mrome Re SHPO Meeting on March 20 2024 Public
| author name = Trefethen J
| author name = Trefethen J
| author affiliation = NRC/NMSS/DREFS/ERMB
| author affiliation = NRC/NMSS/DREFS/ERMB
Line 19: Line 19:
May 28, 2024
May 28, 2024


MEMORANDUM TO:                                                                                                                                     Michelle R. Rome, Chief Environmental Technical Review Branch 1 Division of Rulemaking, Environmental, and Financial Support Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
MEMORANDUM TO: Michelle R. Rome, Chief Environmental Technical Review Branch 1 Division of Rulemaking, Environmental, and Financial Support Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards


FROM:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Jean Trefethen, Environmental Project Manager Environmental Technical Review Branch 1                       Signed by Trefethen, Jean Division of Rulemaking, Environmental,                       on 05/28/24 and Financial Support Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
FROM: Jean Trefethen, Environmental Project Manager Environmental Technical Review Branch 1 Signed by Trefethen, Jean Division of Rulemaking, Environmental, on 05/28/24 and Financial Support Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Line 38: Line 38:


CA SHPO also indicated that the age of the site documentation is important, if surveys are older than 10-15 years they may need to be updated, as the landscape and viewsheds may have changed. Additionally, surveys should consider all National Historic Preservation Act criteria, as well as tangible and intangible resources.
CA SHPO also indicated that the age of the site documentation is important, if surveys are older than 10-15 years they may need to be updated, as the landscape and viewsheds may have changed. Additionally, surveys should consider all National Historic Preservation Act criteria, as well as tangible and intangible resources.
M. Rome                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             2
M. Rome 2


ATTENDEES:
ATTENDEES:
Line 48: Line 48:
On Teams:
On Teams:
Isaac Johnstone, Environmental Project Manager - ISFSI Kim Conway, Environmental Project Manager - NPP Lindsey Renaud, NRC Contract Archaeologist
Isaac Johnstone, Environmental Project Manager - ISFSI Kim Conway, Environmental Project Manager - NPP Lindsey Renaud, NRC Contract Archaeologist
                                                    



  %,.2. )$(%++% .,%  3,,"05.& 
  %,.2. )$(%++%.,%  3,,"05.& 
,%%2)-'4)2(                                        "5 
,%%2)-'4)2(  "5 
   
 


            



     $$%11).- . %,.         
 $$%11).-. %,. 
  
  
                                                                                                    
    
                                                                                                                                    
  
0%&%2(%-                                                         "+*%0 ,)2(                               .,%                                                               0%&%2(%-
0%&%2(%- "+*%0,)2(.,% 0%&%2(%-
                                                                            /0 
/0 
                                              "5 
"5 
                                            "5 
"5 
                                  "5 
"5 
                                                            !}}
  !}}

Latest revision as of 17:32, 4 October 2024

Memo to Mrome Re SHPO Meeting on March 20 2024 Public
ML24109A191
Person / Time
Issue date: 05/28/2024
From: Jean Trefethen
NRC/NMSS/DREFS/ERMB
To: Rome M
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
Download: ML24109A191 (1)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

May 28, 2024

MEMORANDUM TO: Michelle R. Rome, Chief Environmental Technical Review Branch 1 Division of Rulemaking, Environmental, and Financial Support Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

FROM: Jean Trefethen, Environmental Project Manager Environmental Technical Review Branch 1 Signed by Trefethen, Jean Division of Rulemaking, Environmental, on 05/28/24 and Financial Support Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

SUBJECT:

March 20, 2024;

SUMMARY

OF MEETING BETWEEN THE U.S.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF AND THE CALIFORNIA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE

On March 20, 2024, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff meet with representatives from the California State Historic Preservation Office (CA SHPO) in Sacramento, CA. The CA SHPO is a consulting party pursuant to Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 800.2(c)(1) regarding the proposed license renewal (LR) for Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCCP) Unit 1 and Unit 2 and LR of the DCPP Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI).

During the meeting, the NRC staff and CA SHPO representatives discussed NRCs LR, environmental and cultural resources review processes, development and history of DCPP, and anticipated next steps. The NRC staff shared that the DCPP LR is in the early phase of the review process and provided dates and methods available for engagement on the undertaking.

The CA SHPO shared some thoughts regarding future actions and their expectations. The CA SHPO representatives specifically stated that they would like to consider options to address the potential impacts due to continued operations and maintenance during the 20-year LR period and during decommissioning given that it is reasonably foreseeable.

Additionally, the NRC staff explained that the DCCP ISFSI LR is nearing the end of the review period.

CA SHPO also indicated that the age of the site documentation is important, if surveys are older than 10-15 years they may need to be updated, as the landscape and viewsheds may have changed. Additionally, surveys should consider all National Historic Preservation Act criteria, as well as tangible and intangible resources.

M. Rome 2

ATTENDEES:

California State Historic Preservation Office Brenden Greenaway, Senior State Archaeologist Julianne Polanco, State Historic Preservation Officer

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff Michelle Rome, Branch Chief Jean Trefethen, Environmental Project Manager

On Teams:

Isaac Johnstone, Environmental Project Manager - ISFSI Kim Conway, Environmental Project Manager - NPP Lindsey Renaud, NRC Contract Archaeologist



%,.2. )$(%++%.,%  3,,"05.& 

,%%2)-'4)2(  "5 

 



 $$%11).-.  %,. 

  

    

  

0%&%2(%- "+*%0,)2(.,% 0%&%2(%-

/0 

"5 

"5 

"5 

  !