ML24223A063: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: | {{#Wiki_filter:From: Sheila Dempsey <sdbrulee@aol.com> | ||
Sent: | Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2024 3:34 PM To: TerraPowerEnvironmental Resource | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
==Dear NRC,== | ==Dear NRC,== | ||
The proposed Natrium nuclear power plant project near Kemmerer, Wyoming is precedent-setting for the future of nuclear power and warrants a careful and thorough review. | The proposed Natrium nuclear power plant project near Kemmerer, Wyoming is precedent-setting for the future of nuclear power and warrants a careful and thorough review. | ||
The environmental impact statement for the Natrium reactor project must consider the environmental, economic, and public health impacts of severe nuclear accidents. The only other commercial power reactors of Natriums type that have ever operated in the US--the Sodium Reactor Experiment near Los Angeles and the Fermi unit 1 reactor near Detroit--had a number of accidents and failures, including partial meltdowns in 1959 and 1966. The liquid sodium coolant Natrium would use is intensely flammable if the reactor were ever to leak--explosively so, if the sodium coolant were to come in contact with water. | The environmental impact statement for the Natrium reactor project must consider the environmental, economic, and public health impacts of severe nuclear accidents. The only other commercial power reactors of Natriums type that have ever operated in the US--the Sodium Reactor Experiment near Los Angeles and the Fermi unit 1 reactor near Detroit--had a number of accidents and failures, including partial meltdowns in 1959 and 1966. The liquid sodium coolant Natrium would use is intensely flammable if the reactor were ever to leak--explosively so, if the sodium coolant were to come in contact with water. | ||
| Line 32: | Line 31: | ||
The total taxpayer cost and any potential impacts on the federal debt from subsidies should be identified. The relationship between Rocky Mountain Power and TerraPower must be clarified, along with any ratepayer impacts such as higher utility bills. Finally, the EIS should consider a full range of alternatives to the proposed nuclear power plant, including lower-cost and readily available renewable energy options. | The total taxpayer cost and any potential impacts on the federal debt from subsidies should be identified. The relationship between Rocky Mountain Power and TerraPower must be clarified, along with any ratepayer impacts such as higher utility bills. Finally, the EIS should consider a full range of alternatives to the proposed nuclear power plant, including lower-cost and readily available renewable energy options. | ||
Sincerely, Sheila Dempsey 600 west 239 street Bronx, NY 10463 Federal Register Notice: | Sincerely, Sheila Dempsey 600 west 239 street Bronx, NY 10463 Federal Register Notice: 89FR49917 Comment Number: 875 | ||
Mail Envelope Properties | Mail Envelope Properties (4e397b80-9971-45cf-9cce-f63f402cc69a) | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
[External_Sender] Docket ID NRC-2024-0078, Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; US SFR Owner, LLC; Kemmerer Power Station Unit 1 Sent Date: | [External_Sender] Docket ID NRC-2024-0078, Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; US SFR Owner, LLC; Kemmerer Power Station Unit 1 Sent Date: 8/8/2024 3:33:45 PM Received Date: 8/8/2024 3:33:52 PM From: Sheila Dempsey | ||
Created By: | Created By: sdbrulee@aol.com | ||
Recipients: | Recipients: | ||
| Line 45: | Line 44: | ||
Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None | ||
Post Office: | Post Office: salsalabs.org | ||
Files | Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1931 8/8/2024 3:33:52 PM | ||
Options Priority: | Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:}} | ||
Revision as of 10:21, 4 October 2024
| ML24223A063 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Kemmerer File:TerraPower icon.png |
| Issue date: | 08/08/2024 |
| From: | Public Commenter Public Commenter |
| To: | NRC/NMSS/DREFS |
| NRC/NMSS/DREFS | |
| References | |
| 89FR49917 | |
| Download: ML24223A063 (2) | |
Text
From: Sheila Dempsey <sdbrulee@aol.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2024 3:34 PM To: TerraPowerEnvironmental Resource
Subject:
[External_Sender] Docket ID NRC-2024-0078, Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; US SFR Owner, LLC; Kemmerer Power Station Unit 1
Dear NRC:
Program Management Office of Administration,
Dear NRC,
The proposed Natrium nuclear power plant project near Kemmerer, Wyoming is precedent-setting for the future of nuclear power and warrants a careful and thorough review.
The environmental impact statement for the Natrium reactor project must consider the environmental, economic, and public health impacts of severe nuclear accidents. The only other commercial power reactors of Natriums type that have ever operated in the US--the Sodium Reactor Experiment near Los Angeles and the Fermi unit 1 reactor near Detroit--had a number of accidents and failures, including partial meltdowns in 1959 and 1966. The liquid sodium coolant Natrium would use is intensely flammable if the reactor were ever to leak--explosively so, if the sodium coolant were to come in contact with water.
The lack of transparency regarding the costs and financial fitness of the applicant is deeply concerning. It is crucial for the NRC to uphold all regulatory requirements, including public disclosure. The storage of nuclear waste in Wyoming is unacceptable, and no new nuclear plants should be licensed without a permanent waste disposal solution in place. The transportation risks of nuclear materials to and from the site must be comprehensively evaluated. Additionally, all impacts of uranium mining, milling, and the production of HALEU fuel for the proposed plant need to be disclosed.
The total taxpayer cost and any potential impacts on the federal debt from subsidies should be identified. The relationship between Rocky Mountain Power and TerraPower must be clarified, along with any ratepayer impacts such as higher utility bills. Finally, the EIS should consider a full range of alternatives to the proposed nuclear power plant, including lower-cost and readily available renewable energy options.
Sincerely, Sheila Dempsey 600 west 239 street Bronx, NY 10463 Federal Register Notice: 89FR49917 Comment Number: 875
Mail Envelope Properties (4e397b80-9971-45cf-9cce-f63f402cc69a)
Subject:
[External_Sender] Docket ID NRC-2024-0078, Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; US SFR Owner, LLC; Kemmerer Power Station Unit 1 Sent Date: 8/8/2024 3:33:45 PM Received Date: 8/8/2024 3:33:52 PM From: Sheila Dempsey
Created By: sdbrulee@aol.com
Recipients:
"TerraPowerEnvironmental Resource" <TerraPowerEnvironmental.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None
Post Office: salsalabs.org
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1931 8/8/2024 3:33:52 PM
Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: