ENS 57174: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| title = Technical Specification Reportable Occurrence | | title = Technical Specification Reportable Occurrence | ||
| event text = The following information was provided by the licensee via email: | | event text = The following information was provided by the licensee via email: | ||
At approximately 1100 CDT on June 14, 2024, during routine fuel inspections required under Technical Specification 4.1.5, a fuel pin (serial number 11420) did not pass the go/no-go test for transverse bend. This measurement is described in Technical Specification 3.1.5.2.a as part of the fuel inspection conducted under the surveillance described in Technical Specification 4.1.5. Failure of an element to meet any one of the specifications listed in Technical Specification 3.1.5.2 specifies that the fuel element is considered | At approximately 1100 CDT on June 14, 2024, during routine fuel inspections required under Technical Specification 4.1.5, a fuel pin (serial number 11420) did not pass the go/no-go test for transverse bend. This measurement is described in Technical Specification 3.1.5.2.a as part of the fuel inspection conducted under the surveillance described in Technical Specification 4.1.5. Failure of an element to meet any one of the specifications listed in Technical Specification 3.1.5.2 specifies that the fuel element is considered 'damaged' and therefore may not be used in reactor operations. | ||
Visual inspection of the pin prior to placement in the test rig did not indicate any obvious degradation that would be exceptional for a pin with seventeen years of burnup history. | Visual inspection of the pin prior to placement in the test rig did not indicate any obvious degradation that would be exceptional for a pin with seventeen years of burnup history. | ||
There have been no indications of cladding failure on routine primary coolant analyses. | There have been no indications of cladding failure on routine primary coolant analyses. | ||
Revision as of 23:38, 18 June 2024
| Where | |
|---|---|
| Texas A&Amp;M University (Tamn) College Station, Texas (NRC Region 0) | |
| License number: | R-83 |
| Reporting | |
| Non | |
| Time - Person (Reporting Time:+-0.42 h-0.0175 days <br />-0.0025 weeks <br />-5.75316e-4 months <br />) | |
| Opened: | Jere Jenkins 15:35 Jun 14, 2024 |
| NRC Officer: | Josue Ramirez |
| Last Updated: | Jun 14, 2024 |
| 57174 - NRC Website | |