ML20092M301: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
Line 23: Line 23:
==Dear Ihr. Murley:==
==Dear Ihr. Murley:==


IE BULLETIN 83-07 REVISED RESPONSE SALEM GENERATING STATION UNITS NO. 1 AND 2 DOCKETS NOS 50-272 AND 50-311 By' letter dated March 14, 1984, we provided a response to'the subj ect bulletin. . In that letter, we indicated that Salem Generating Station had ~ not- received any products sold by ' Ray Miller, Inc.            In fact, we did receive some 304 and 304L stainless steel pipe and fittings from Richmond Engineering Co. (RECO) that had been furnished by Ray Miller, Inc. The Ray Miller pipe and fittings were used with Salem's CVCS Holdup tanks, Liquid Waste. Monitors tanks and the Evaporator Bottoms tanks. Because the Ray Miller-Inc. materials were not used in safety-related applications, they~were mistakenly considered outside the scope of the bulletin, and thus, were not identified in our March 14, 1984 letter; In our March 14, 1984 letter, we also committed to several actions to improve our ability to identify fraudulent vendor practices in the future. One short term commitment was to provide training t o the Ouality Assurance /Ouality Control Receiving group. This training was to be completed by May 1, 1984; however, due to scope increases and late receipt of supporting information, it is still not complete. In order to provide valid training, several industry professional societies and organizations were contacted to obtain guidance on identifying fraudulent vendor practices. Such guidance information was not received within a time frame to support the.May 1, 1984 date. Additionally, the scope of the potential problem is more critical than originally estimated, 8407020196 840612                                              a  0 The Energy Peopl4              gDRADOCK05000 D
IE BULLETIN 83-07 REVISED RESPONSE SALEM GENERATING STATION UNITS NO. 1 AND 2 DOCKETS NOS 50-272 AND 50-311 By' {{letter dated|date=March 14, 1984|text=letter dated March 14, 1984}}, we provided a response to'the subj ect bulletin. . In that letter, we indicated that Salem Generating Station had ~ not- received any products sold by ' Ray Miller, Inc.            In fact, we did receive some 304 and 304L stainless steel pipe and fittings from Richmond Engineering Co. (RECO) that had been furnished by Ray Miller, Inc. The Ray Miller pipe and fittings were used with Salem's CVCS Holdup tanks, Liquid Waste. Monitors tanks and the Evaporator Bottoms tanks. Because the Ray Miller-Inc. materials were not used in safety-related applications, they~were mistakenly considered outside the scope of the bulletin, and thus, were not identified in our {{letter dated|date=March 14, 1984|text=March 14, 1984 letter}}; In our {{letter dated|date=March 14, 1984|text=March 14, 1984 letter}}, we also committed to several actions to improve our ability to identify fraudulent vendor practices in the future. One short term commitment was to provide training t o the Ouality Assurance /Ouality Control Receiving group. This training was to be completed by May 1, 1984; however, due to scope increases and late receipt of supporting information, it is still not complete. In order to provide valid training, several industry professional societies and organizations were contacted to obtain guidance on identifying fraudulent vendor practices. Such guidance information was not received within a time frame to support the.May 1, 1984 date. Additionally, the scope of the potential problem is more critical than originally estimated, 8407020196 840612                                              a  0 The Energy Peopl4              gDRADOCK05000 D
                                                                                                       %2'68,RC% 9182 IUL U
                                                                                                       %2'68,RC% 9182 IUL U



Revision as of 02:13, 25 September 2022

Revises Response to IE Bulletin 83-07 Re Products Sold by Ray Miller,Inc.Stainless Steel Pipe & Fittings 304 & 304L Received from Richmond Engineering Co Had Been Furnished by Ray Miller,Inc.Qa/Qc Receiving Group Training Incomplete
ML20092M301
Person / Time
Site: Salem  
Issue date: 06/12/1984
From: Liden E
Public Service Enterprise Group
To: Murley T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
IEB-83-07, IEB-83-7, NUDOCS 8407020196
Download: ML20092M301 (2)


Text

p

  1. p ,:

OPSEG

~ Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Nuclear Department June 12, 1984 Dr. Thomas E. Murley, Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region-1 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

Dear Ihr. Murley:

IE BULLETIN 83-07 REVISED RESPONSE SALEM GENERATING STATION UNITS NO. 1 AND 2 DOCKETS NOS 50-272 AND 50-311 By' letter dated March 14, 1984, we provided a response to'the subj ect bulletin. . In that letter, we indicated that Salem Generating Station had ~ not- received any products sold by ' Ray Miller, Inc. In fact, we did receive some 304 and 304L stainless steel pipe and fittings from Richmond Engineering Co. (RECO) that had been furnished by Ray Miller, Inc. The Ray Miller pipe and fittings were used with Salem's CVCS Holdup tanks, Liquid Waste. Monitors tanks and the Evaporator Bottoms tanks. Because the Ray Miller-Inc. materials were not used in safety-related applications, they~were mistakenly considered outside the scope of the bulletin, and thus, were not identified in our March 14, 1984 letter; In our March 14, 1984 letter, we also committed to several actions to improve our ability to identify fraudulent vendor practices in the future. One short term commitment was to provide training t o the Ouality Assurance /Ouality Control Receiving group. This training was to be completed by May 1, 1984; however, due to scope increases and late receipt of supporting information, it is still not complete. In order to provide valid training, several industry professional societies and organizations were contacted to obtain guidance on identifying fraudulent vendor practices. Such guidance information was not received within a time frame to support the.May 1, 1984 date. Additionally, the scope of the potential problem is more critical than originally estimated, 8407020196 840612 a 0 The Energy Peopl4 gDRADOCK05000 D

%2'68,RC% 9182 IUL U

y . -:

17 h

_f.-%:

Dr. Thomas E. Murley- 6/12/84 thus' additional development time was required. As of this  ;

date, -the training program. has been - developed and is undergoing internal? review and approval. , Training for Ouality Assurance /Ouality Control' Receiving group will be completed by Junej22, 1984. Please ' note that this training' will also be incorporated'into our recurring training program for all Ouality Assurance /Ouality. control inspectors.

Sincerely, ,

E. A. Liden Manager - Nuclear Licensing and Regulation C Mr. Donald C. Fischer-Licensing Project Manager Mr. James Linville Senior-' Resident Inspector h

f P

s

? '

'f

'!ic ,. ....

P

^

- -~ _ - ., . . ,-.....r. .-,.v.., , . -.- , -,,-,-- ,. ,..

-y- . . .w