ML20149F883: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML20149F883 | |||
| issue date = 07/16/1997 | |||
| title = Forwards Exam Rept 50-483/97-301 on 970707.No Violations Noted.Insp Included Evaluation of Two Applicants for Reactor Operator Licenses.Both Applicants Satisified Requirements & Licenses Have Been Issued | |||
| author name = Howell A | |||
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) | |||
| addressee name = Randolph G | |||
| addressee affiliation = UNION ELECTRIC CO. | |||
| docket = 05000483 | |||
| license number = | |||
| contact person = | |||
| document report number = 50-483-97-301, NUDOCS 9707220351 | |||
| package number = ML20149F887 | |||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE | |||
| page count = 5 | |||
}} | |||
See also: [[see also::IR 05000483/1997301]] | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:m . m __ .. m . . . . . . . . _ . __. _ _ _ . _ | |||
l- 0 | |||
l .. | |||
b' .p 8"'Go UNITED STATES | |||
, | |||
. | |||
' | |||
6 | |||
2 | |||
- | |||
4 | |||
.o | |||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
* | |||
, | |||
s $ REGloN IV | |||
l 3, 4 | |||
611 HYAN PLAZA DRIVE. SUITE 400 | |||
$ 0 | |||
AR LINGToN, T E XAs 760118064 | |||
9.....v | |||
l July 16, 1997 | |||
Garry L. Randolph, Vice President and | |||
Chief Nuclear Officer | |||
Union Electric Company | |||
P.O. Box 620 | |||
Fulton, Missouri 65251 | |||
SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-483/97-301 | |||
Dear Mr. Randolph: | |||
An NRC inspection was conducted July 7,1997, covering activities at your Callaway Plant | |||
reactor facility. The enclosed report presents the scope and results of that inspection. | |||
The inspection included an evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses. We | |||
determined that both applicants satisfied the requirements and the licenses have been | |||
issued. | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter | |||
and its enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR). | |||
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss | |||
them with you. | |||
I | |||
Sincerely, | |||
x | |||
. [1Ic - | |||
gh Arthur T. Howell lil, Director | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
l | |||
Docket No.: 50-483 | |||
License No.: NPF-30 1 | |||
Enclosure: | |||
- NRC Inspection Report } | |||
i | |||
00-483/97-301 | |||
l | |||
l [ | |||
, | |||
i | |||
! 9707220351 970716 | |||
l PDR ADOCK 05000483 naam l lllll unqllngluimll | |||
llllllllhuplullmn ll llll0l | |||
V PDR ******* , | |||
_ | |||
- . .. ___ . _ _ . _ _ . - .___.._.___. _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . _ _ _ . . _ . - _ _ , . , _ _ _ | |||
. .-. | |||
. | |||
. | |||
. | |||
Union Electric Company - - | |||
2- | |||
cc w/ enclosure and Attachment 1: | |||
Professional Nuclear Consulting, Inc. | |||
19041 Raines Drive | |||
Derwood, Maryland 20855 | |||
Gerald Charnoff, Esq. | |||
Thomas A. Baxter, Esq. | |||
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge | |||
2300 N. Street, N.W. | |||
Washington, D.C. 20037 | |||
H. D. Bono, Supervising Engineer | |||
Site Licensing | |||
Union Electric Company | |||
P.O. Box 620 | |||
Fulton,, Missouri 65251 | |||
i- | |||
' | |||
Manager Electric Department | |||
Missouri Public Service Commission | |||
301 W. High | |||
P.O. Box 360 | |||
. Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 . | |||
1 | |||
Ronald A. Kucera, Deputy Director . i | |||
Department of Natural Resources ) | |||
! | |||
P.O. Box 176 j | |||
. | |||
- | |||
Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 | |||
i | |||
Otto L. Maynard, President and | |||
Chief Executive Officer | |||
l Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation | |||
l ' P.O.' Box 411 | |||
Burlington, Kansas 66839 | |||
Dan 1. Bolef, President | |||
. | |||
Kay Drey, Representative | |||
Board of Directors Coalition | |||
' for the Environment 'l | |||
6267 Delmar Boulevard ! | |||
i- University City, Missouri 63130 i | |||
! l | |||
Lee Fritz, Presiding Commissioner ] | |||
5 | |||
Callaway County Court House ' | |||
1 10 East Fifth Street | |||
i | |||
Fulton, Missouri 65151 | |||
I | |||
l | |||
! | |||
I | |||
- , - , , = -- | |||
r v---r- 7-w | |||
_. . . .-. ._ . - .. . . . | |||
* . | |||
I | |||
' | |||
J l | |||
* . | |||
Union Electric Company -3- | |||
* | |||
l | |||
Alan C. Passwater, Manager | |||
Licensing and Fuels | |||
Union Electric Company | |||
' | |||
P.O. Box 66149 | |||
St. Louis, Missouri 63166-6149 | |||
> | |||
J. V. Laux, Manager | |||
. Quality Assurance | |||
* | |||
Union Electric Company | |||
P.O. Box 620 | |||
Fulton, Missouri 65251 | |||
G. J. Czeschin, Superintendent | |||
Training | |||
* | |||
Union Electric Company | |||
P.O. Box 620 | |||
Fulton, Missouri 65251 | |||
. | |||
; | |||
.- | |||
, | |||
. | |||
Union Electric Company -4- | |||
' | |||
E-Mail report to T. Boyce (THB) 1 | |||
E-Mail report to NRR Event Tracking System (IPAS) | |||
E-Mail report to Document Control Desk (DOCDESK) | |||
bec to DCD (IE01)(IE42) | |||
bec distrib. by RIV w/ Enclosure and Attachment.1: l | |||
Regional Administrator. Resident inspector | |||
DRP Director DRS-PSB | |||
Branch Chief (DRP/B) MIS System | |||
Project Engineer (DRP/B) RIV File | |||
Branch Chief (DRP/TSS) | |||
bec distrib. by RIV w/ Enclosure and Attachments 1-2: | |||
R. Gallo (HOLB/NRR) | |||
L. Hurley | |||
DOCUMENT NAME: R:\_CW\CW7301rp.HFB | |||
To receive copy of document, indicate in box: "C" = Copy withog enclosures "E" = Copy with enclosures "N" = No copy | |||
RIV:RE:OB E C:OB g D:DRP (p D:DRS pf | |||
HBundy/Imb @ JLPellet M TPGwyng ATHowell, Ill& | |||
07//*/97 07/lW97 U\'' 07/1997 07/s/97 1 | |||
OFFIC:AL RECORD col'Y | |||
; | |||
_ _ . . _ . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ - _ . ~ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ , _ _ _ _ . . . . _ . . . . . _ . . _ _ . . . _ . . . - . . . _ . . . - . . _ | |||
i | |||
2 | |||
b | |||
i | |||
Union Electric Company -4- | |||
- E-Mail report to T. Boyce (THB) t | |||
E-Mail report to NRR Event Tracking System (IPAS) | |||
E-Mail' report to Docume'nt Control Desk (DOCDESK) | |||
bec to DC (IE42)- | |||
' bec distrib, by RIV w/ Enclosure and Attachment 1: | |||
Regional Administrator Resident inspector | |||
DRP Director DRS-PSB | |||
Branch Chief (DRP/B) MIS System | |||
Project Engineer (DRP/B) RIV File | |||
Branch Chief (DRP/TSS) | |||
bec distrib. by RIV w/ Enclosure and Attachments 12: | |||
R. Gallo (HOLB/NRR) | |||
L. Hurley | |||
i | |||
, DOCUMENT NAME: R:\_CW\CW7301rp.HFB | |||
! To receive copy of document. Indicate in box: "C" = Copy withogenclosures "E" = Copy with enclosures "N" = No copy | |||
RIV:RE:OB E C:OB g D:DRP (1 D:DRS psf | |||
; HBundy/imb @ JLPellet M TPGwyn(/ ATHowell, Ill& | |||
07//*/97 07/$r97 U\'' 07/1997 07/4/97 | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
] | |||
. . . . . .- - . ._ , . . . _ - _ __ _ - . - _ . _ . . | |||
.. .. - . - . . . . . . .-- _.-..~..--- - -. . .. .- . . . = . . | |||
i .. | |||
.. . | |||
. . | |||
. 1 | |||
ENCLOSURE | |||
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
REGION IV i | |||
Docket No.: 50-483 1 | |||
i | |||
License No.: NPF-30 | |||
Report No.: 50-483/97-301 | |||
Licensee: Union Electric Company | |||
i | |||
Facility: Callaway Plant | |||
Location: Junction Hwy. CC and Hwy. O | |||
Fulton, Missouri | |||
Dates: . July 7,1997 | |||
Inspector: H. Bundy, Chief Examiner, Operations Branch | |||
l | |||
Approved By: J. L. Pellet, Chief, Operations Branch | |||
Division of Reactor Safety - i | |||
1 | |||
l | |||
1 | |||
ATTACHMENTS: , | |||
I | |||
Attachment 1: Supplemental Information | |||
Attachment 2: Final Written Examination and Answer Key | |||
! | |||
l | |||
1 | |||
l | |||
i | |||
l | |||
I | |||
l | |||
i | |||
i | |||
l | |||
i | |||
l | |||
, | |||
9707220356 970716 | |||
PDR ADOCK 05000483 | |||
V PDR | |||
J | |||
. | |||
,. | |||
. | |||
. | |||
2- | |||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | |||
Callaway Plant | |||
NRC Inspection Report 50-483/97-301 | |||
NRC examiners evaluated the competency of two retake reactor operator license applicants | |||
for issuance of operating licenses at the Callaway Plant facility. The licensee developed | |||
the initial license examination using NUREG-1021, " Operator Licensing Standards for , | |||
Power Reactors," Interim Revision 8. The initial written examinations were administered to J | |||
both applicants on June 27.1997, by facility proctors in accordance with instructions | |||
provided by the chief examiner. The operating tests had been waived for these applicants. | |||
Both applicants displayed the requisite knowledge and skills to satisfy the requirements of l | |||
10 CFR 55 and were issued reactor operator licenses. 1 | |||
Operations | |||
* Both applicants passed the reactor operator written examination. No broad | |||
knowledge or training weaknesses were identified as a result of evaluation of the | |||
graded examinations. | |||
! | |||
1 * The licensee submitted a satisfactory examination outline which was used for | |||
examination development. | |||
* The written examination was acceptable for administration as submitted and of high | |||
l quality. | |||
l | |||
l | |||
l | |||
. | |||
I | |||
,_ _ _ . - | |||
. | |||
, | |||
. | |||
n l | |||
1 | |||
. | |||
-3- | |||
Reoort Details -; | |||
l. Operations | |||
04 Operator Knowledge and Performance | |||
04.1 initial Written Examination | |||
a. Insoection Scope | |||
On June 27,1997, the facility licensee proctored the administration of the written | |||
examination approved by the chief examiner and NRC Region IV supervision.to two | |||
individuals who had app!ird for initial retake reactor operator licenses. The licensee | |||
graded the written examinations and the staff reviewed its results. These | |||
individuals had previously passed the operating test portion of the examination and | |||
it had been waived by Region IV. The licensee also performed a post-examination : | |||
question analysis, which was reviewed by the chief examiner. This inspection | |||
corisisted of in-office review and approval of the examination results supplied by the | |||
licensee. | |||
b. Observations and Findinas | |||
l | |||
The minimum passing score was 80 percent. The scores for the applicants | |||
averaged 81.8 percent. Both applicants missed Questions 23,42,'53, 61, 62,72, | |||
87,95, and 98. Pursuant to the licensee's request, Question 99 was deleted | |||
because the proctors inadvertently failed to provide an attached curve, which was | |||
necessary to answer the question. Also, pursuant to the licensee's request, | |||
Choice C was allowed as a correct answer in addition to Choice D for Question 32. | |||
The examinations were regraded based on these determinations. No broad training | |||
or knowledge weaknesses were identified. Reasons for missing the valid questions | |||
anpeared to be related to question difficulty and isolated knowledge weaknesses, | |||
c. C iclusions | |||
both applicants passed the reactor operator written examination. No broad | |||
knowledge or training weaknesses were identified as a result of evaluation of the | |||
graded examinations. | |||
05 Operator Training and Qualification | |||
, | |||
l~ | |||
, -05.1 initial Licensino Examination Develooment | |||
l | |||
l The facility licensee developed the initiallicensing examination in accordance with | |||
guidance provided in NUREG-1021, " Operator Licensing Examination Standards for | |||
Power Reactors," Interim Revision 8. | |||
_ _ | |||
,_ | |||
_ _ _ _ _ | |||
. ! | |||
- l | |||
.. l | |||
. ! | |||
* | |||
4 . | |||
' | |||
) | |||
a | |||
05.1.1 Examination Outline | |||
a. Insoection Scoce | |||
The facility licensee submitted the initial examination outline on May 2,1997. The i | |||
chief examiner reviewed the submittal against the requirements of NUREG-1021. | |||
b. Observations and Findinas | |||
] | |||
The initial examination outline was satisfactory as a guide for development of the | |||
examination. However, the chief examiner provided several minor enhancement | |||
suggestions which were incorporated by the licensee. ; | |||
c. Conclusions | |||
i | |||
The licensee submitted a satisfactory examination outline, which was used for ! | |||
examination development. | |||
l | |||
05.1.2 Examination Packaae | |||
a. Inspection Scope | |||
I | |||
The facility licensee submitted the completed examination package on June 12, l | |||
1997. The chief examiner reviewed the submittal against the requirements of I | |||
NUREG-1021. j | |||
i | |||
b. Observations and Findinas | |||
The draf t-written examination contained 100 questions, of which 67 were new, j | |||
12 were modified licensee examination bank questions, and 21 were directly from i | |||
the licensee's examination bank. This distribution satisfied NUREG-1021 | |||
requirements. The draft examination was responsive to the knowledge and abilities | |||
sample plan submitted on May 2,1997, technically valid, and discriminated at the ; | |||
proper level. It was considered adequate for administration. The questions were I | |||
generally of high quality. However, the chief examiner provided comments on j | |||
construction for 8 questions. The comments related to the suitability of question | |||
' | |||
distractors or construction of the question etem. In response to the chief | |||
examiner's comments, the licensee revised v replaced these questions. | |||
I | |||
c. Conclusions j | |||
l | |||
The written examination was acceptable for administration as submitted and of high | |||
quality. | |||
! | |||
i | |||
! | |||
l | |||
) | |||
! | |||
. _ _ - . - _ _ - . . - . _ . _ . _ _ _ , _ - _ - _ -_ . , . ___.. . . . . - _ - . . - - _ _ _ .. . - . _ . _ _ _ .. . | |||
l. | |||
c. | |||
;g | |||
o; | |||
-5- | |||
V. Manaaement Meetinas | |||
!-- | |||
, 'X1 Exit Meeting Summary | |||
. The chief examiner presented the inspection results to Mr. Czeschin 'on July 9, | |||
L 1997, and he acknowledged the findings presented. | |||
! Mr. Czeschin did not identify as proprietary any information or materials examined | |||
.during the inspection. | |||
L | |||
t | |||
! | |||
! | |||
! | |||
, | |||
I | |||
!. | |||
e | |||
! | |||
': | |||
e | |||
! | |||
l' , . . , , ;. r . . . , . . . , , , - . . - - , , , , - - .. . - , - , - -- | |||
-. __. . - - . . . . | |||
i, j | |||
' | |||
., | |||
' | |||
l | |||
o | |||
e | |||
ATTACHMENT 1 | |||
} 1 | |||
! | |||
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION l | |||
" | |||
PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED | |||
Licensee | |||
F. Biermann, Operating Supervisor, Training | |||
G. Czeschin, Superintendent, Training | |||
R. Moody, Operating Supervisor, Training | |||
' | |||
R. Neil, Shift Supervisor Operations, Training | |||
NRC ) | |||
D. Passehl, Senior Resident inspector | |||
l | |||
l | |||
}} | |||
Revision as of 14:46, 11 December 2021
| ML20149F883 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway |
| Issue date: | 07/16/1997 |
| From: | Howell A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Randolph G UNION ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20149F887 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-483-97-301, NUDOCS 9707220351 | |
| Download: ML20149F883 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000483/1997301
Text
m . m __ .. m . . . . . . . . _ . __. _ _ _ . _
l- 0
l ..
b' .p 8"'Go UNITED STATES
,
.
'
6
2
-
4
.o
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,
s $ REGloN IV
l 3, 4
611 HYAN PLAZA DRIVE. SUITE 400
$ 0
AR LINGToN, T E XAs 760118064
9.....v
l July 16, 1997
Garry L. Randolph, Vice President and
Chief Nuclear Officer
Union Electric Company
P.O. Box 620
Fulton, Missouri 65251
SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-483/97-301
Dear Mr. Randolph:
An NRC inspection was conducted July 7,1997, covering activities at your Callaway Plant
reactor facility. The enclosed report presents the scope and results of that inspection.
The inspection included an evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses. We
determined that both applicants satisfied the requirements and the licenses have been
issued.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter
and its enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss
them with you.
I
Sincerely,
x
. [1Ic -
gh Arthur T. Howell lil, Director
Division of Reactor Safety
l
Docket No.: 50-483
License No.: NPF-30 1
Enclosure:
- NRC Inspection Report }
i
00-483/97-301
l
l [
,
i
! 9707220351 970716
l PDR ADOCK 05000483 naam l lllll unqllngluimll
llllllllhuplullmn ll llll0l
V PDR ******* ,
_
- . .. ___ . _ _ . _ _ . - .___.._.___. _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . _ _ _ . . _ . - _ _ , . , _ _ _
. .-.
.
.
.
Union Electric Company - -
2-
cc w/ enclosure and Attachment 1:
Professional Nuclear Consulting, Inc.
19041 Raines Drive
Derwood, Maryland 20855
Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
Thomas A. Baxter, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge
2300 N. Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037
H. D. Bono, Supervising Engineer
Site Licensing
Union Electric Company
P.O. Box 620
Fulton,, Missouri 65251
i-
'
Manager Electric Department
Missouri Public Service Commission
301 W. High
P.O. Box 360
. Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 .
1
Ronald A. Kucera, Deputy Director . i
Department of Natural Resources )
!
P.O. Box 176 j
.
-
Jefferson City, Missouri 65102
i
Otto L. Maynard, President and
Chief Executive Officer
l Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation
l ' P.O.' Box 411
Burlington, Kansas 66839
Dan 1. Bolef, President
.
Kay Drey, Representative
Board of Directors Coalition
' for the Environment 'l
6267 Delmar Boulevard !
i- University City, Missouri 63130 i
! l
Lee Fritz, Presiding Commissioner ]
5
Callaway County Court House '
1 10 East Fifth Street
i
Fulton, Missouri 65151
I
l
!
I
- , - , , = --
r v---r- 7-w
_. . . .-. ._ . - .. . . .
- .
I
'
J l
- .
Union Electric Company -3-
l
Alan C. Passwater, Manager
Licensing and Fuels
Union Electric Company
'
P.O. Box 66149
St. Louis, Missouri 63166-6149
>
J. V. Laux, Manager
. Quality Assurance
Union Electric Company
P.O. Box 620
Fulton, Missouri 65251
G. J. Czeschin, Superintendent
Training
Union Electric Company
P.O. Box 620
Fulton, Missouri 65251
.
.-
,
.
Union Electric Company -4-
'
E-Mail report to T. Boyce (THB) 1
E-Mail report to NRR Event Tracking System (IPAS)
E-Mail report to Document Control Desk (DOCDESK)
bec to DCD (IE01)(IE42)
bec distrib. by RIV w/ Enclosure and Attachment.1: l
Regional Administrator. Resident inspector
DRP Director DRS-PSB
Branch Chief (DRP/B) MIS System
Project Engineer (DRP/B) RIV File
Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)
bec distrib. by RIV w/ Enclosure and Attachments 1-2:
R. Gallo (HOLB/NRR)
L. Hurley
DOCUMENT NAME: R:\_CW\CW7301rp.HFB
To receive copy of document, indicate in box: "C" = Copy withog enclosures "E" = Copy with enclosures "N" = No copy
RIV:RE:OB E C:OB g D:DRP (p D:DRS pf
HBundy/Imb @ JLPellet M TPGwyng ATHowell, Ill&
07//*/97 07/lW97 U\ 07/1997 07/s/97 1
OFFIC:AL RECORD col'Y
_ _ . . _ . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ - _ . ~ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ , _ _ _ _ . . . . _ . . . . . _ . . _ _ . . . _ . . . - . . . _ . . . - . . _
i
2
b
i
Union Electric Company -4-
- E-Mail report to T. Boyce (THB) t
E-Mail report to NRR Event Tracking System (IPAS)
E-Mail' report to Docume'nt Control Desk (DOCDESK)
bec to DC (IE42)-
' bec distrib, by RIV w/ Enclosure and Attachment 1:
Regional Administrator Resident inspector
DRP Director DRS-PSB
Branch Chief (DRP/B) MIS System
Project Engineer (DRP/B) RIV File
Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)
bec distrib. by RIV w/ Enclosure and Attachments 12:
R. Gallo (HOLB/NRR)
L. Hurley
i
, DOCUMENT NAME: R:\_CW\CW7301rp.HFB
! To receive copy of document. Indicate in box: "C" = Copy withogenclosures "E" = Copy with enclosures "N" = No copy
RIV:RE:OB E C:OB g D:DRP (1 D:DRS psf
- HBundy/imb @ JLPellet M TPGwyn(/ ATHowell, Ill&
07//*/97 07/$r97 U\ 07/1997 07/4/97
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
]
. . . . . .- - . ._ , . . . _ - _ __ _ - . - _ . _ . .
.. .. - . - . . . . . . .-- _.-..~..--- - -. . .. .- . . . = . .
i ..
.. .
. .
. 1
ENCLOSURE
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV i
Docket No.: 50-483 1
i
License No.: NPF-30
Report No.: 50-483/97-301
Licensee: Union Electric Company
i
Facility: Callaway Plant
Location: Junction Hwy. CC and Hwy. O
Fulton, Missouri
Dates: . July 7,1997
Inspector: H. Bundy, Chief Examiner, Operations Branch
l
Approved By: J. L. Pellet, Chief, Operations Branch
Division of Reactor Safety - i
1
l
1
ATTACHMENTS: ,
I
Attachment 1: Supplemental Information
Attachment 2: Final Written Examination and Answer Key
!
l
1
l
i
l
I
l
i
i
l
i
l
,
9707220356 970716
PDR ADOCK 05000483
V PDR
J
.
,.
.
.
2-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Callaway Plant
NRC Inspection Report 50-483/97-301
NRC examiners evaluated the competency of two retake reactor operator license applicants
for issuance of operating licenses at the Callaway Plant facility. The licensee developed
the initial license examination using NUREG-1021, " Operator Licensing Standards for ,
Power Reactors," Interim Revision 8. The initial written examinations were administered to J
both applicants on June 27.1997, by facility proctors in accordance with instructions
provided by the chief examiner. The operating tests had been waived for these applicants.
Both applicants displayed the requisite knowledge and skills to satisfy the requirements of l
10 CFR 55 and were issued reactor operator licenses. 1
Operations
- Both applicants passed the reactor operator written examination. No broad
knowledge or training weaknesses were identified as a result of evaluation of the
graded examinations.
!
1 * The licensee submitted a satisfactory examination outline which was used for
examination development.
- The written examination was acceptable for administration as submitted and of high
l quality.
l
l
l
.
I
,_ _ _ . -
.
,
.
n l
1
.
-3-
Reoort Details -;
l. Operations
04 Operator Knowledge and Performance
04.1 initial Written Examination
a. Insoection Scope
On June 27,1997, the facility licensee proctored the administration of the written
examination approved by the chief examiner and NRC Region IV supervision.to two
individuals who had app!ird for initial retake reactor operator licenses. The licensee
graded the written examinations and the staff reviewed its results. These
individuals had previously passed the operating test portion of the examination and
it had been waived by Region IV. The licensee also performed a post-examination :
question analysis, which was reviewed by the chief examiner. This inspection
corisisted of in-office review and approval of the examination results supplied by the
licensee.
b. Observations and Findinas
l
The minimum passing score was 80 percent. The scores for the applicants
averaged 81.8 percent. Both applicants missed Questions 23,42,'53, 61, 62,72,
87,95, and 98. Pursuant to the licensee's request, Question 99 was deleted
because the proctors inadvertently failed to provide an attached curve, which was
necessary to answer the question. Also, pursuant to the licensee's request,
Choice C was allowed as a correct answer in addition to Choice D for Question 32.
The examinations were regraded based on these determinations. No broad training
or knowledge weaknesses were identified. Reasons for missing the valid questions
anpeared to be related to question difficulty and isolated knowledge weaknesses,
c. C iclusions
both applicants passed the reactor operator written examination. No broad
knowledge or training weaknesses were identified as a result of evaluation of the
graded examinations.
05 Operator Training and Qualification
,
l~
, -05.1 initial Licensino Examination Develooment
l
l The facility licensee developed the initiallicensing examination in accordance with
guidance provided in NUREG-1021, " Operator Licensing Examination Standards for
Power Reactors," Interim Revision 8.
_ _
,_
_ _ _ _ _
. !
- l
.. l
. !
4 .
'
)
a
05.1.1 Examination Outline
a. Insoection Scoce
The facility licensee submitted the initial examination outline on May 2,1997. The i
chief examiner reviewed the submittal against the requirements of NUREG-1021.
b. Observations and Findinas
]
The initial examination outline was satisfactory as a guide for development of the
examination. However, the chief examiner provided several minor enhancement
suggestions which were incorporated by the licensee. ;
c. Conclusions
i
The licensee submitted a satisfactory examination outline, which was used for !
examination development.
l
05.1.2 Examination Packaae
a. Inspection Scope
I
The facility licensee submitted the completed examination package on June 12, l
1997. The chief examiner reviewed the submittal against the requirements of I
NUREG-1021. j
i
b. Observations and Findinas
The draf t-written examination contained 100 questions, of which 67 were new, j
12 were modified licensee examination bank questions, and 21 were directly from i
the licensee's examination bank. This distribution satisfied NUREG-1021
requirements. The draft examination was responsive to the knowledge and abilities
sample plan submitted on May 2,1997, technically valid, and discriminated at the ;
proper level. It was considered adequate for administration. The questions were I
generally of high quality. However, the chief examiner provided comments on j
construction for 8 questions. The comments related to the suitability of question
'
distractors or construction of the question etem. In response to the chief
examiner's comments, the licensee revised v replaced these questions.
I
c. Conclusions j
l
The written examination was acceptable for administration as submitted and of high
quality.
!
i
!
l
)
!
. _ _ - . - _ _ - . . - . _ . _ . _ _ _ , _ - _ - _ -_ . , . ___.. . . . . - _ - . . - - _ _ _ .. . - . _ . _ _ _ .. .
l.
c.
- g
o;
-5-
V. Manaaement Meetinas
!--
, 'X1 Exit Meeting Summary
. The chief examiner presented the inspection results to Mr. Czeschin 'on July 9,
L 1997, and he acknowledged the findings presented.
! Mr. Czeschin did not identify as proprietary any information or materials examined
.during the inspection.
L
t
!
!
!
,
I
!.
e
!
':
e
!
l' , . . , , ;. r . . . , . . . , , , - . . - - , , , , - - .. . - , - , - --
-. __. . - - . . . .
i, j
'
.,
'
l
o
e
ATTACHMENT 1
} 1
!
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION l
"
PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED
Licensee
F. Biermann, Operating Supervisor, Training
G. Czeschin, Superintendent, Training
R. Moody, Operating Supervisor, Training
'
R. Neil, Shift Supervisor Operations, Training
NRC )
D. Passehl, Senior Resident inspector
l
l