Text

Forwards Exam Rept 50-483/97-301 on 970707.No Violations Noted.Insp Included Evaluation of Two Applicants for Reactor Operator Licenses.Both Applicants Satisified Requirements & Licenses Have Been Issued
	ML20149F883
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	07/16/1997
From:	Howell A; NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Randolph G; UNION ELECTRIC CO.
Shared Package
ML20149F887	List: ML20149F883; ML20210G966;
References
	50-483-97-301, NUDOCS 9707220351
	Download: ML20149F883 (5)
	v • d • e

m . m __ .. m . . . . . . . . _ . __. _ _ _ . _

l- 0

l ..

b' .p 8"'Go UNITED STATES

,

.

'

6

2

-

4

.o

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

,

s $ REGloN IV

l 3, 4

611 HYAN PLAZA DRIVE. SUITE 400

$ 0

AR LINGToN, T E XAs 760118064

9.....v

l July 16, 1997

Garry L. Randolph, Vice President and

Chief Nuclear Officer

Union Electric Company

P.O. Box 620

Fulton, Missouri 65251

SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-483/97-301

Dear Mr. Randolph:

An NRC inspection was conducted July 7,1997, covering activities at your Callaway Plant

reactor facility. The enclosed report presents the scope and results of that inspection.

The inspection included an evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses. We

determined that both applicants satisfied the requirements and the licenses have been

issued.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter

and its enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss

them with you.

I

Sincerely,

x

. [1Ic -

gh Arthur T. Howell lil, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

l

Docket No.: 50-483

License No.: NPF-30 1

Enclosure:

- NRC Inspection Report }

i

00-483/97-301

l

l [

,

i

! 9707220351 970716

l PDR ADOCK 05000483 naam l lllll unqllngluimll

llllllllhuplullmn ll llll0l

V PDR ******* ,

_

- . .. ___ . _ _ . _ _ . - .___.._.___. _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . _ _ _ . . _ . - _ _ , . , _ _ _

. .-.

.

Union Electric Company - -

2-

cc w/ enclosure and Attachment 1:

Professional Nuclear Consulting, Inc.

19041 Raines Drive

Derwood, Maryland 20855

Gerald Charnoff, Esq.

Thomas A. Baxter, Esq.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge

2300 N. Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20037

H. D. Bono, Supervising Engineer

Site Licensing

Union Electric Company

P.O. Box 620

Fulton,, Missouri 65251

i-

'

Manager Electric Department

Missouri Public Service Commission

301 W. High

P.O. Box 360

. Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 .

1

Ronald A. Kucera, Deputy Director . i

Department of Natural Resources )

!

P.O. Box 176 j

.

-

Jefferson City, Missouri 65102

i

Otto L. Maynard, President and

Chief Executive Officer

l Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation

l ' P.O.' Box 411

Burlington, Kansas 66839

Dan 1. Bolef, President

.

Kay Drey, Representative

Board of Directors Coalition

' for the Environment 'l

6267 Delmar Boulevard !

i- University City, Missouri 63130 i

! l

Lee Fritz, Presiding Commissioner ]

5

Callaway County Court House '

1 10 East Fifth Street

i

Fulton, Missouri 65151

I

l

!

I

- , - , , = --

r v---r- 7-w

_. . . .-. ._ . - .. . . .

.

I

'

J l

.

Union Electric Company -3-

l

Alan C. Passwater, Manager

Licensing and Fuels

Union Electric Company

'

P.O. Box 66149

St. Louis, Missouri 63166-6149

>

J. V. Laux, Manager

. Quality Assurance

Union Electric Company

P.O. Box 620

Fulton, Missouri 65251

G. J. Czeschin, Superintendent

Training

Union Electric Company

P.O. Box 620

Fulton, Missouri 65251

.

.-

,

.

Union Electric Company -4-

'

E-Mail report to T. Boyce (THB) 1

E-Mail report to NRR Event Tracking System (IPAS)

E-Mail report to Document Control Desk (DOCDESK)

bec to DCD (IE01)(IE42)

bec distrib. by RIV w/ Enclosure and Attachment.1: l

Regional Administrator. Resident inspector

DRP Director DRS-PSB

Branch Chief (DRP/B) MIS System

Project Engineer (DRP/B) RIV File

Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)

bec distrib. by RIV w/ Enclosure and Attachments 1-2:

R. Gallo (HOLB/NRR)

L. Hurley

DOCUMENT NAME: R:\_CW\CW7301rp.HFB

To receive copy of document, indicate in box: "C" = Copy withog enclosures "E" = Copy with enclosures "N" = No copy

RIV:RE:OB E C:OB g D:DRP (p D:DRS pf

HBundy/Imb @ JLPellet M TPGwyng ATHowell, Ill&

07//*/97 07/lW97 U\ 07/1997 07/s/97 1

OFFIC:AL RECORD col'Y

_ _ . . _ . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ - _ . ~ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ , _ _ _ _ . . . . _ . . . . . _ . . _ _ . . . _ . . . - . . . _ . . . - . . _

i

2

b

i

Union Electric Company -4-

- E-Mail report to T. Boyce (THB) t

E-Mail report to NRR Event Tracking System (IPAS)

E-Mail' report to Docume'nt Control Desk (DOCDESK)

bec to DC (IE42)-

' bec distrib, by RIV w/ Enclosure and Attachment 1:

Regional Administrator Resident inspector

DRP Director DRS-PSB

Branch Chief (DRP/B) MIS System

Project Engineer (DRP/B) RIV File

Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)

bec distrib. by RIV w/ Enclosure and Attachments 12:

R. Gallo (HOLB/NRR)

L. Hurley

i

, DOCUMENT NAME: R:\_CW\CW7301rp.HFB

! To receive copy of document. Indicate in box: "C" = Copy withogenclosures "E" = Copy with enclosures "N" = No copy

RIV:RE:OB E C:OB g D:DRP (1 D:DRS psf

HBundy/imb @ JLPellet M TPGwyn(/ ATHowell, Ill&

07//*/97 07/$r97 U\ 07/1997 07/4/97

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

]

. . . . . .- - . ._ , . . . _ - _ __ _ - . - _ . _ . .

.. .. - . - . . . . . . .-- _.-..~..--- - -. . .. .- . . . = . .

i ..

.. .

. .

. 1

ENCLOSURE

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV i

Docket No.: 50-483 1

i

License No.: NPF-30

Report No.: 50-483/97-301

Licensee: Union Electric Company

i

Facility: Callaway Plant

Location: Junction Hwy. CC and Hwy. O

Fulton, Missouri

Dates: . July 7,1997

Inspector: H. Bundy, Chief Examiner, Operations Branch

l

Approved By: J. L. Pellet, Chief, Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety - i

1

l

1

ATTACHMENTS: ,

I

Attachment 1: Supplemental Information

Attachment 2: Final Written Examination and Answer Key

!

l

1

l

i

l

I

l

i

l

i

l

,

9707220356 970716

PDR ADOCK 05000483

V PDR

J

.

,.

.

2-

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Callaway Plant

NRC Inspection Report 50-483/97-301

NRC examiners evaluated the competency of two retake reactor operator license applicants

for issuance of operating licenses at the Callaway Plant facility. The licensee developed

the initial license examination using NUREG-1021, " Operator Licensing Standards for ,

Power Reactors," Interim Revision 8. The initial written examinations were administered to J

both applicants on June 27.1997, by facility proctors in accordance with instructions

provided by the chief examiner. The operating tests had been waived for these applicants.

Both applicants displayed the requisite knowledge and skills to satisfy the requirements of l

10 CFR 55 and were issued reactor operator licenses. 1

Operations

Both applicants passed the reactor operator written examination. No broad

knowledge or training weaknesses were identified as a result of evaluation of the

graded examinations.

!

1 * The licensee submitted a satisfactory examination outline which was used for

examination development.

The written examination was acceptable for administration as submitted and of high

l quality.

l

.

I

,_ _ _ . -

.

,

.

n l

1

.

-3-

Reoort Details -;

l. Operations

04 Operator Knowledge and Performance

04.1 initial Written Examination

a. Insoection Scope

On June 27,1997, the facility licensee proctored the administration of the written

examination approved by the chief examiner and NRC Region IV supervision.to two

individuals who had app!ird for initial retake reactor operator licenses. The licensee

graded the written examinations and the staff reviewed its results. These

individuals had previously passed the operating test portion of the examination and

it had been waived by Region IV. The licensee also performed a post-examination :

question analysis, which was reviewed by the chief examiner. This inspection

corisisted of in-office review and approval of the examination results supplied by the

licensee.

b. Observations and Findinas

l

The minimum passing score was 80 percent. The scores for the applicants

averaged 81.8 percent. Both applicants missed Questions 23,42,'53, 61, 62,72,

87,95, and 98. Pursuant to the licensee's request, Question 99 was deleted

because the proctors inadvertently failed to provide an attached curve, which was

necessary to answer the question. Also, pursuant to the licensee's request,

Choice C was allowed as a correct answer in addition to Choice D for Question 32.

The examinations were regraded based on these determinations. No broad training

or knowledge weaknesses were identified. Reasons for missing the valid questions

anpeared to be related to question difficulty and isolated knowledge weaknesses,

c. C iclusions

both applicants passed the reactor operator written examination. No broad

knowledge or training weaknesses were identified as a result of evaluation of the

graded examinations.

05 Operator Training and Qualification

,

l~

, -05.1 initial Licensino Examination Develooment

l

l The facility licensee developed the initiallicensing examination in accordance with

guidance provided in NUREG-1021, " Operator Licensing Examination Standards for

Power Reactors," Interim Revision 8.

_ _

,_

_ _ _ _ _

. !

- l

.. l

. !

4 .

'

)

a

05.1.1 Examination Outline

a. Insoection Scoce

The facility licensee submitted the initial examination outline on May 2,1997. The i

chief examiner reviewed the submittal against the requirements of NUREG-1021.

b. Observations and Findinas

]

The initial examination outline was satisfactory as a guide for development of the

examination. However, the chief examiner provided several minor enhancement

suggestions which were incorporated by the licensee. ;

c. Conclusions

i

The licensee submitted a satisfactory examination outline, which was used for !

examination development.

l

05.1.2 Examination Packaae

a. Inspection Scope

I

The facility licensee submitted the completed examination package on June 12, l

1997. The chief examiner reviewed the submittal against the requirements of I

NUREG-1021. j

i

b. Observations and Findinas

The draf t-written examination contained 100 questions, of which 67 were new, j

12 were modified licensee examination bank questions, and 21 were directly from i

the licensee's examination bank. This distribution satisfied NUREG-1021

requirements. The draft examination was responsive to the knowledge and abilities

sample plan submitted on May 2,1997, technically valid, and discriminated at the ;

proper level. It was considered adequate for administration. The questions were I

generally of high quality. However, the chief examiner provided comments on j

construction for 8 questions. The comments related to the suitability of question

'

distractors or construction of the question etem. In response to the chief

examiner's comments, the licensee revised v replaced these questions.

I

c. Conclusions j

l

The written examination was acceptable for administration as submitted and of high

quality.

!

i

!

l

)

!

. _ _ - . - _ _ - . . - . _ . _ . _ _ _ , _ - _ - _ -_ . , . ___.. . . . . - _ - . . - - _ _ _ .. . - . _ . _ _ _ .. .

l.

c.

g

o;

-5-

V. Manaaement Meetinas

!--

, 'X1 Exit Meeting Summary

. The chief examiner presented the inspection results to Mr. Czeschin 'on July 9,

L 1997, and he acknowledged the findings presented.

! Mr. Czeschin did not identify as proprietary any information or materials examined

.during the inspection.

L

t

!

,

I

!.

e

!

':

e

!

l' , . . , , ;. r . . . , . . . , , , - . . - - , , , , - - .. . - , - , - --

-. __. . - - . . . .

i, j

'

.,

'

l

o

e

ATTACHMENT 1

} 1

!

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION l

"

PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED

Licensee

F. Biermann, Operating Supervisor, Training

G. Czeschin, Superintendent, Training

R. Moody, Operating Supervisor, Training

'

R. Neil, Shift Supervisor Operations, Training

NRC )

D. Passehl, Senior Resident inspector

l

ML20149F883

Text

Navigation menu

Search