ML20065G974: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:m- A o l O ; r!M = | ||
s , | |||
: /.; | |||
0( 5 . | |||
,> y_ . | |||
ing v | |||
.{ | |||
' Duke Mer Cornpa 7 '(803)&11 2 000-- | |||
' ' ; J[ , | |||
''y : | |||
. Cutuwba Nuclw Station I - | |||
O />0 k ?% .. _ | |||
: Clowr. SCZ9710 - | |||
gs .- p j *, -.th. | |||
N ' | |||
.pyggpyygg. Q Q( Y H d' . October.1,-1990-Susan S. Adamovitz, Region-II U.' S. Nuclear: Regulatory Conunission , | |||
101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900- | |||
*. -Atlanta, iga '30323 ; | |||
4,. ' <' ! | |||
==Subject:== | |||
. Catawba Nuclear Station [ | |||
Docket Nos 50-413 and 50-414 pALSS Operability / Reliability ., | |||
File'No: .CN-715.15 ! | |||
l 3 | |||
.At the: exit interview at Catawba'. Nuclear Station ~ (CNS) we' agreed to ' | |||
T the following commitments: ., | |||
y - | |||
hi, | |||
, 1) By~ September 1,' 1990 - To repair the : pALSS as designed and 'i | |||
. . maintain 175% ' reliability. Results: CNS has corrected , | |||
- all ' of . the . original problems and has obtained passing: ' | |||
:results on both~ panels, .however due to - new problems 'and | |||
;g repeated ~ calibration - drif ts on ; old . problems, CNS was not a | |||
', ables to achieve ~ a greater than 75% reliability.. CNS has- | |||
-curr'ently focused its: skills on items 2 and'3. | |||
i t j | |||
, , 2) 'If i 75% ro11 ability cannot be. maintained with the I | |||
current-design off. the ~ panels, CNSE will either modify the current' | |||
'[ | |||
, , panels or replace . the panels and' have - the; panels : operable. '! | |||
% This will -be accomplished ~ by . September : 1,' 1991.- | |||
~ | |||
.Results: .; | |||
'Due to cthe :three - reasons listed below- CNS ~ has determinedL that it.would be best to replace the current panels and have | |||
?h ~them operable by 9/1/91. l a)- Modification costs to redesign-the current panels to ani ; | |||
operable / reliable condition. would rival the new panel ~ ! | |||
replacement costs. | |||
A | |||
-b) The current maintensace/ operation, costs on the current' f panels are excessive. It would.be cost-ineffective to | |||
- continue operating . the current panels on a 'long term g,' basis. ; | |||
y- , | |||
J | |||
.i l | |||
' << ,i 9010240314 901001 PDR .ADOCK 05000413 P= PDC - | |||
.i l | |||
^ | |||
if0 [ | |||
,&f f'I 3 | |||
: v. - , | |||
pf [*: a-4l 9 .1 yd. : -k W | |||
l', t *^ | |||
PALSS Oyerability/ Reliability | |||
,. ;Page'2' b i Octobrr li 1990-c) ~ If the current' panels were redesigned, maintained and _ | |||
, operated regularly it would- atill be very difficult to- ! | |||
maintain a greater than 75% reliability. | |||
:3) We wil'1 expend great effort to achieve highest possible. | |||
rollability of the PALSS panels between September 1, 1990. | |||
.and September 1, 1991.: .Results: CNSl. has operated .the Unit-1 panel a total of 19 test runs from the middle .of July to the 'end of August and Unit-2. panel a. total of 30 test runs from the1 first~ week in August to September,1. A total' of 19 work requests have been. written between the two units. , | |||
CNS has corrected 7 problems on' the Unit-1 panel and has 1 | |||
-corrected 14. problems' on 1the..iUnit-2. panel.. . The .w ork | |||
, requests a problem -solving f and.. panel - testing (has involved 20 employeesc -from Chemistry, . Maintenance Engineering- ! | |||
Services, Instrumentation and Electrical, -Radiation j Protection, Integrated Scheduling- and Planning. Team- l effort from these, groups amounted to 10401 man-hours. CNS will continue to. test the panels once per month on'each unit; j | |||
-and- will utilize. all available resources to ' maintain' the ! | |||
y highest possible reliability. Any equipment problems :will i | |||
^' | |||
-be handled in'a expedient manner. h 1 | |||
j t | |||
.. Tj l | |||
'Very Truly-yours, | |||
.g {j WP d J. S.'Forbes ,1 iTechnical Services Superintendent I | |||
. Catawba Nuclear. Station ' | |||
e i | |||
! I | |||
: 3. .i BDM/dlw- }> | |||
xc: R.- M. Propst W. M. McCollum C. L. Ilartzell'. W.11. Miller C] R. L. Painter- R. A. Jones J.LR.,Wallace J. W. Hampton C. L. Therrien T.=E. Crawford | |||
' s J. C.: Taylor B. D. McNeill C J. ,11. Amirl J. E. Reece 4 | |||
i | |||
!! .[. } ' , | |||
t.'}} | |||
Revision as of 07:38, 6 January 2021
| ML20065G974 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba |
| Issue date: | 10/01/1990 |
| From: | Forbes J DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | Adamovitz S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9010240314 | |
| Download: ML20065G974 (2) | |
Text
m- A o l O ; r!M =
s ,
- /.;
0( 5 .
,> y_ .
ing v
.{
' Duke Mer Cornpa 7 '(803)&11 2 000--
' ' ; J[ ,
y :
. Cutuwba Nuclw Station I -
O />0 k ?% .. _
- Clowr. SCZ9710 -
gs .- p j *, -.th.
N '
.pyggpyygg. Q Q( Y H d' . October.1,-1990-Susan S. Adamovitz, Region-II U.' S. Nuclear: Regulatory Conunission ,
101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900-
- . -Atlanta, iga '30323 ;
4,. ' <' !
Subject:
. Catawba Nuclear Station [
Docket Nos 50-413 and 50-414 pALSS Operability / Reliability .,
File'No: .CN-715.15 !
l 3
.At the: exit interview at Catawba'. Nuclear Station ~ (CNS) we' agreed to '
T the following commitments: .,
y -
hi,
, 1) By~ September 1,' 1990 - To repair the : pALSS as designed and 'i
. . maintain 175% ' reliability. Results: CNS has corrected ,
- all ' of . the . original problems and has obtained passing: '
- results on both~ panels, .however due to - new problems 'and
- g repeated ~ calibration - drif ts on ; old . problems, CNS was not a
', ables to achieve ~ a greater than 75% reliability.. CNS has-
-curr'ently focused its: skills on items 2 and'3.
i t j
, , 2) 'If i 75% ro11 ability cannot be. maintained with the I
current-design off. the ~ panels, CNSE will either modify the current'
'[
, , panels or replace . the panels and' have - the; panels : operable. '!
% This will -be accomplished ~ by . September : 1,' 1991.-
~
.Results: .;
'Due to cthe :three - reasons listed below- CNS ~ has determinedL that it.would be best to replace the current panels and have
?h ~them operable by 9/1/91. l a)- Modification costs to redesign-the current panels to ani ;
operable / reliable condition. would rival the new panel ~ !
replacement costs.
A
-b) The current maintensace/ operation, costs on the current' f panels are excessive. It would.be cost-ineffective to
- continue operating . the current panels on a 'long term g,' basis. ;
y- ,
J
.i l
' << ,i 9010240314 901001 PDR .ADOCK 05000413 P= PDC -
.i l
^
if0 [
,&f f'I 3
- v. - ,
pf [*: a-4l 9 .1 yd. : -k W
l', t *^
PALSS Oyerability/ Reliability
,. ;Page'2' b i Octobrr li 1990-c) ~ If the current' panels were redesigned, maintained and _
, operated regularly it would- atill be very difficult to- !
maintain a greater than 75% reliability.
- 3) We wil'1 expend great effort to achieve highest possible.
rollability of the PALSS panels between September 1, 1990.
.and September 1, 1991.: .Results: CNSl. has operated .the Unit-1 panel a total of 19 test runs from the middle .of July to the 'end of August and Unit-2. panel a. total of 30 test runs from the1 first~ week in August to September,1. A total' of 19 work requests have been. written between the two units. ,
CNS has corrected 7 problems on' the Unit-1 panel and has 1
-corrected 14. problems' on 1the..iUnit-2. panel.. . The .w ork
, requests a problem -solving f and.. panel - testing (has involved 20 employeesc -from Chemistry, . Maintenance Engineering- !
Services, Instrumentation and Electrical, -Radiation j Protection, Integrated Scheduling- and Planning. Team- l effort from these, groups amounted to 10401 man-hours. CNS will continue to. test the panels once per month on'each unit; j
-and- will utilize. all available resources to ' maintain' the !
y highest possible reliability. Any equipment problems :will i
^'
-be handled in'a expedient manner. h 1
j t
.. Tj l
'Very Truly-yours,
.g {j WP d J. S.'Forbes ,1 iTechnical Services Superintendent I
. Catawba Nuclear. Station '
e i
! I
- 3. .i BDM/dlw- }>
xc: R.- M. Propst W. M. McCollum C. L. Ilartzell'. W.11. Miller C] R. L. Painter- R. A. Jones J.LR.,Wallace J. W. Hampton C. L. Therrien T.=E. Crawford
' s J. C.: Taylor B. D. McNeill C J. ,11. Amirl J. E. Reece 4
i
!! .[. } ' ,
t.'