ML20205B812: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:-_ | ||
w -. | |||
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION FVY 86-64 | |||
. RD 5, Box 169, Ferry Road, Brattleboro, VT 05301 REPLY TO. | |||
p ENGINEERING OFFICE 1671 WORCESTER ROAD | |||
. FRAMINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS 01701 | |||
. TELEPHONE 617-872-8100 July 22, 1986 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection & Enforcement Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Attn: Stewart D. Ebneter, Director Division of Reactor Safety | |||
==References:== | |||
a) License No. DPR-28 (Docket No. 50-271) b) Letter, USNRC to VYNPC, dated 6/23/86, and Inspection Report 86-13, Appendix A (Notice of Violation) | |||
==Dear Sir:== | |||
==Subject:== | |||
Response to Inspection Report 86-12 This letter is written in response to Reference b), which indicates that one of our activities was not conducted in full compliance with Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements. This Level V violation was identified as a result of an inspection conducted by your Mr. K. Manoly during the period May 12-16, 1986. | |||
Information is submitted as follows in answer to the alleged violation con-tained in the Appendix to your letter. | |||
ITEM Vermont Yankee Technical Specification 6.5.A.5 requires detailed writ-ten procedures be adhered to for maintenance (modification) operations which could have an effect on the safety of the reactor. Yankee Atomic Electric Company Operational Quality Assurance Program YOQAP-1-A and Morrison Knudsen Quality Assurance Program reiterate the same requirements regarding the accomplishing of activities affecting quality through documented procedures. Morrison Knudsen Field Quality i . | |||
Procedure FQP-9.1 requires, in Section 4.9, technicians to complete a Visual Weld Examination Report for work examined. | |||
Contrary to the above, visual weld examination on recirculation piping l whip restraints No. R6A and R98 were not documented on a Visual Weld l | |||
Examination Report as required. | |||
t l 8608120138 860722 PDR t | |||
G ADOCK 05000271 PDR i | |||
) D | |||
[ fE oi | |||
s z.- | |||
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission July 22, 1986 Page 2 i | |||
RESPONSE Welds on recirculation piping whip restraints No. R6A and R9B were inspected and accepted by contractor Quality Control person-nel on April 24, 1986 and May 4, 1986 respectively, as required by Morrison Knudsen Field Quality Procedure FQP-9.1. These inspections were documer..ed on Weld History Cards by inspector initials, date, certification type and level, step number, and accept / reject criteria. However, contrary to Morrison Knudsen Field Quality Procedure FQP-9.1, the inspector failed to dupli-cate this information on a Visual Weld Examination Report. | |||
These discrepancies were resolved by the Contractor QC/ Licensee QA prog rams. | |||
Morrison Knudsen Nonconformance Report No. 237, and Vermont Yankee Nonconformance Report No. 86-82, were generated on May 20, 1986 and May 22, 1986, respectively. It was determined that the discrepancies were acceptable as-is based on the inspections per-formed on Apr:1 24 and May 4 since the appropriate accept / reject criteria were 1ound on the Weld History Card. In order to pre-vent recurrencs, all Morrison Knudsen inspectors were reinstructed to complete a Visual Weld Examination Card for all applicable inspections. | |||
We consider the above actions adequate to prevent recurrence of these events and to achieve full compliance; however, should you have any questions or desire additional information, please contact us. | |||
Very truly yours, VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION 4444 - | |||
Warren P. Murphy f | |||
Vice President an Manager of Operations | |||
/dm 1 | |||
-___--_____ _ - . _ _}} | |||
Revision as of 05:52, 30 December 2020
| ML20205B812 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
| Issue date: | 07/22/1986 |
| From: | Murphy W VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORP. |
| To: | Ebneter S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| FVY-86-64, NUDOCS 8608120158 | |
| Download: ML20205B812 (2) | |
Text
-_
w -.
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION FVY 86-64
. RD 5, Box 169, Ferry Road, Brattleboro, VT 05301 REPLY TO.
p ENGINEERING OFFICE 1671 WORCESTER ROAD
. FRAMINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS 01701
. TELEPHONE 617-872-8100 July 22, 1986 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection & Enforcement Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Attn: Stewart D. Ebneter, Director Division of Reactor Safety
References:
a) License No. DPR-28 (Docket No. 50-271) b) Letter, USNRC to VYNPC, dated 6/23/86, and Inspection Report 86-13, Appendix A (Notice of Violation)
Dear Sir:
Subject:
Response to Inspection Report 86-12 This letter is written in response to Reference b), which indicates that one of our activities was not conducted in full compliance with Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements. This Level V violation was identified as a result of an inspection conducted by your Mr. K. Manoly during the period May 12-16, 1986.
Information is submitted as follows in answer to the alleged violation con-tained in the Appendix to your letter.
ITEM Vermont Yankee Technical Specification 6.5.A.5 requires detailed writ-ten procedures be adhered to for maintenance (modification) operations which could have an effect on the safety of the reactor. Yankee Atomic Electric Company Operational Quality Assurance Program YOQAP-1-A and Morrison Knudsen Quality Assurance Program reiterate the same requirements regarding the accomplishing of activities affecting quality through documented procedures. Morrison Knudsen Field Quality i .
Procedure FQP-9.1 requires, in Section 4.9, technicians to complete a Visual Weld Examination Report for work examined.
Contrary to the above, visual weld examination on recirculation piping l whip restraints No. R6A and R98 were not documented on a Visual Weld l
Examination Report as required.
t l 8608120138 860722 PDR t
G ADOCK 05000271 PDR i
) D
[ fE oi
s z.-
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission July 22, 1986 Page 2 i
RESPONSE Welds on recirculation piping whip restraints No. R6A and R9B were inspected and accepted by contractor Quality Control person-nel on April 24, 1986 and May 4, 1986 respectively, as required by Morrison Knudsen Field Quality Procedure FQP-9.1. These inspections were documer..ed on Weld History Cards by inspector initials, date, certification type and level, step number, and accept / reject criteria. However, contrary to Morrison Knudsen Field Quality Procedure FQP-9.1, the inspector failed to dupli-cate this information on a Visual Weld Examination Report.
These discrepancies were resolved by the Contractor QC/ Licensee QA prog rams.
Morrison Knudsen Nonconformance Report No. 237, and Vermont Yankee Nonconformance Report No. 86-82, were generated on May 20, 1986 and May 22, 1986, respectively. It was determined that the discrepancies were acceptable as-is based on the inspections per-formed on Apr:1 24 and May 4 since the appropriate accept / reject criteria were 1ound on the Weld History Card. In order to pre-vent recurrencs, all Morrison Knudsen inspectors were reinstructed to complete a Visual Weld Examination Card for all applicable inspections.
We consider the above actions adequate to prevent recurrence of these events and to achieve full compliance; however, should you have any questions or desire additional information, please contact us.
Very truly yours, VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION 4444 -
Warren P. Murphy f
Vice President an Manager of Operations
/dm 1
-___--_____ _ - . _ _