ML20195K256: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:.                    . . _._ _              _          .
es
* 1, November 23, 1998 c.
MEMORANDUM TO: Thomas H. Essig, Acting Chief Generic issues and Environmental Projects Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:                  Stewart L. Magruder, Project Manager Original Signed By:
Generic Issues and Environmental Projects Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
==SUBJECT:==
 
==SUMMARY==
OF MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 12,1998, WITH THE LICENSING AND DESIGN BASES CLEARINGHOUSE On November 12,1998, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staf,f met with the Licensing and Design Bases Clearinghouse at the offices of Winston & Strawn in Washington, D.C. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss recent activities related to 10 CFR 50.59 and the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR). Attachment 1 lists the meeting participants.
Attachment 2 is a copy of the staff presentation at the meeting.
During the meeting, the group discussed the status of industry and NRC initiatives related to 10 CFR 50.59, design bases per 10 CFR 50.2, and the UFSAR. The group discussed the relationship between industry and staff views on these topics and what steps could be taken to resolve any differences.
Attachments: As stated cc w!stt: See next page Document Name:g:simi\1112.98                0  s OFFICE        PGEB SC:Pfh NAME          SMagruder:swM FAkklcz DATE          11M198                11///h/98 OFFICIAL OFFICE COPY I eT S O      59        '
L i
h            f 7 50 Gc nc (G        )
()jllf['Ike
                                                                                                " cw cm 9811250216 981123 PDR    ORG      NRRA PDR ko')
                                                                                                      %gs a NRC RLF CBITER COPY
 
                          ..      -    .      ~-  - , . .                  ..  ._  .          - _ -  . . - . . _ . - - -
  ,. - '  g,
              @SMOO
,.        p              t                                (JNITED STATES l        g j            NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINCToN, D.C. 2066fM)o01 l
o%*****      /                                          November 23, 1998 l
l                MEMORANDUM TO: Thomas H. Essig, Acting Ref Generic Issues and Envin.,nmental Projects Branch l                                        Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:                  Stewart L. Magruder, Project Manager SCMS %7
;                                        Generic Issues and Environmental Projects Branch              0 Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i
 
==SUBJECT:==
 
==SUMMARY==
OF MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 12,1998, WITH THE LICENSING AND DESIGN BASES CLEARINGHOUSE On November 12,1998, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff met with the Licensing and Design Bases Clearinghouse at the offices of Winston & Strawn in Washington, D.C. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss recent activities related to 10 CFR 50.59 and the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR). Attachment i lists the meeting participants.
Attachment 2 is a copy of the staff presentation at the meeting.
During the meeting, the group discussed the status of industry and NRC initiatives related to 10 CFR 50.59, design bases per 10 CFR 50.2, and the UFSAR. The group discussed the relationship between industry and staff views on these topics and what steps could be taken to                .
resolve any differences.                                                                                      I i
Attachments: As stated                                                                                        l 1
cc w/att: See next page i
L i
: -)    /,
l l                                              List of Attendees l
Name                                      Oraanization Russ Bell                                Nuclear Energy Institute Tony Pietrangelo                          Nuclear Energy Institute Robert Vincent                            Consumers Energy Co.
Mitchell Ross                            Florida Power & Light Mark Flaherty                            Rochester Gas & Electric Mario Robles                              Northeast Utilities Tom Milton                                Southern Nuclear Charlene Faison                          flew York Power Authority Getachew Tesfaye                          Baltimore Gas & Electric Stephen Nass                              Duquesne Light Edward Lemke                              Entergy Operations Bob Rybak                                Commonwealth Edison Daniel Maret                              %ctuoia Consulting Group Steve Bennett                                  orgy Operations Lee Keller                                    ae Energy Terry Garrett                            Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp.
Linda Dewhirst                            Nebraska Public Power District Jeff Keenan                              Public Service Electric & Gas Courtney Smyth                            Public Service Electric & Gas Kenneth Hutko                            Public Service Electric & Gas David Matthews                            Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
r
?
Attachment 1 I
 
                                                                        , - -                ~                                                  7-
                                                                /M                                  43x
                                                              /                                        4
                                                                    !      M                            o
                                                              ?yth!)}0 x4 q, o q t/
NRC STAFF AGiiVITIES CONCERNING g50.59 AND THE UFSAR November 12,1998 David Matthews Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i
;                                                                                                                      Attachment 2                ,
 
RULE OBJECTIVES                                                                                                  !;
        . Preserve integrity of licensing basis i
        . Clarify requirements                                                                                                                        !
* when evaluation is required                                                                                                            i
* criteria for NRC approval
        . Allow " minimal" chann,,es without aPProyal                                                                                                ,
                                                                                                                                                      ?
2
 
KEY RULE ISSUES
          . Definitions and formatting (Means of providing clarification)
          -    Change to the Facility as Described in the SAR
.              (clarification of scope)                                              ,
* changes to design basis and safety analyses
* additions
          . Guidance on Minimal
* for increases in probability and consequences 3
 
                                                                  ~.
KEY RULE ISSUES (CONT'D)
    .        Deletion of USQ term and " safety" evaluation
:    .        Margin of Saf.ety
              >  definition of reduction in margin of safety (options)
    .        Safety Analysis Report
.              >  updates and pending changes
    .        Part 72 Changes i
4
 
                                                            ..t
:- f SRM ON SECY-98-171
  . Publish proposed rule for 60 day comment period 4
(include SRM and votes in FR. notice) i
: . Solicit comment on:
      -  wide array of options for margin of safety p
* options for defining " minimal" for probability
* definitions (e.g., facility, procedures...)
* need for clear definition of " accident" i
  . Schedule
      -  publish proposed rule in October
* final rule to Commission February 19,1999
  . Approved proposals on enforcement discretion
 
CHANGES TO FR NOTICE
  . Discussion on "accidant"
  . Options on m.argin                                      ,
t
* what are the margins
* amount of reduction without approval
* deletion of margin as a criterion                  .
i i
  . Other inserts (voting record, request for comment) i i
i 6
 
MARGIN OPTIONS
                    . Control inputs to analyses that establish TS                                              ,
requirements (nonconservative manner)
                    . Delete margin of safety as criterion
                    . Control results of safety analyses
* fission product barriers
* specified parameters
* degree of change allowed (" minimal")
* evaluation methods l
 
SCREENING EXPERIENCE
  . Majority of violations for failure to perform evaluation (screening process was ineffective)
~
* not known that FSAR was affected
* de facto changes
* maintenance
    -  combination of screening and assessment of impact l
4 4
4 8
 
e  4 O  e STAFF ACT V TES CONCERNING THE UFSAR
                                                                                                                                                                        ~
i t
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              )
I t
I 6
k b
I 1
I f
r i
t-i f
a i
I 6
9
 
GOALS OF GUIDANCE
. Improve consistency in terms of licensees addressing appropriate new issues
. Provide required information, at appropriate level of detail, regardless of prior submittal
- Promote better application of 10 CFR 50.59
. Allow removal of information not required to be in a UFSAR
. In many cases, allow substitution of simplified schematics for detailed drawings 10
 
a'
                                                                                                                                                            ~.'
FUTURE ACTIVITIES Endorsement review of NEl 98-03 in November 1998
                      . Draft regulatory guide to Commission in December 1998
                      - Issue for public comment by March 1999
                      . Final regulatory guide in September 1999
                      . Develop inspection guidance and train staff prior to implementation date (March 2000) 11
- - _ _ _ _ - - _ - -      _ _ _ _              __                  - ___- _ ____- ______-    __ - ________ - - _    _              -__ - __- - _ __ -          a
 
                                                                . 1 ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM 98-007 Issued September 15,1998, available at http ://www.n rc.g ov/O E/rp r/enfm a nleg m 98007.htm Based on current schedule, extends existing enforcement policy until March 30,2000, for information associated with SSCs of high safety significance, and March 30,2001, for all other information.
Schedule may change 12
 
ELECTRONIC SUBMil i AL OF UFSAR I
,            .        Agency implement new information management system in 1999, ADAMS Agency expects to have technological capability to receive electronic submittals in February 1999
* lssueS:
* electronic record                                                                      1
* paper copies
                        -        entire UFSAR versus replacement pages
* changes to NRC processes, including regulations
;            .          Need document creators / owners to be involve -'
j                                                                                      13
 
f::
Nuclear Energy Institute                      Project No. 689 cc: Mr. Ralph Beedle Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Nuclear Energy Institute Suite 400 1776 i Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. Alex Marion, Director Programs Nuclear Energy institute Suite 400 1776 i Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. Anthony Pietrangelo, Director Licensing Nuclear Energy institute Suite 400 1776 i Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. Nicholas J. Liparulo, Manager Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Activities Nuclear and Advanced Technology Division Westinghouse Electric Corporation P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Director Washington Operations ABB-Combustion Engipeering, Inc.
12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 330 Rockville, Maryland 20852 i
i
 
9 r*
: s.                                                                                                      I
!                                                                                                            i Distribution: Mtg. Summary w/ LDB Clearinghouse Dated November 23, 1998                        ;
i i            Hard Coov L          =PUBLIC*                  -
PGEB R/F OGC l            ACRS SMagruder DMatthews' EMail SCollins/FMiraglia
;            BSheron BBoger RZimmerman JRoe TEssig                                                                                        i FAkstulewicz j            EMcKenna TBergman SMagruder GTracy, EDO l
l I-i                                                                                                          !
i i
d l
l
                                                                                                    \      :
4 f
1                                                                                                          i 8 i  , e
: 1.                                                                                                          1 i
i
                                                          -      .  - - -  -. __ . - _ , _ - . , . _.- i}}

Latest revision as of 12:07, 13 November 2020

Summary of 981112 Meeting with Licensing & Design Bases Clearinghouse at Ofc of Winston & Strawn in Washington,Dc to Discuss Recent Activities Re 10CFR50.59 & Ufsar.Meeting Participants & NRC Presentation Encl
ML20195K256
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/23/1998
From: Stewart Magruder
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Essig T
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
References
NUDOCS 9811250216
Download: ML20195K256 (18)


Text

. . . _._ _ _ .

es

  • 1, November 23, 1998 c.

MEMORANDUM TO: Thomas H. Essig, Acting Chief Generic issues and Environmental Projects Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Stewart L. Magruder, Project Manager Original Signed By:

Generic Issues and Environmental Projects Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 12,1998, WITH THE LICENSING AND DESIGN BASES CLEARINGHOUSE On November 12,1998, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staf,f met with the Licensing and Design Bases Clearinghouse at the offices of Winston & Strawn in Washington, D.C. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss recent activities related to 10 CFR 50.59 and the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR). Attachment 1 lists the meeting participants.

Attachment 2 is a copy of the staff presentation at the meeting.

During the meeting, the group discussed the status of industry and NRC initiatives related to 10 CFR 50.59, design bases per 10 CFR 50.2, and the UFSAR. The group discussed the relationship between industry and staff views on these topics and what steps could be taken to resolve any differences.

Attachments: As stated cc w!stt: See next page Document Name:g:simi\1112.98 0 s OFFICE PGEB SC:Pfh NAME SMagruder:swM FAkklcz DATE 11M198 11///h/98 OFFICIAL OFFICE COPY I eT S O 59 '

L i

h f 7 50 Gc nc (G )

()jllf['Ike

" cw cm 9811250216 981123 PDR ORG NRRA PDR ko')

%gs a NRC RLF CBITER COPY

.. - . ~- - , . . .. ._ . - _ - . . - . . _ . - - -

,. - ' g,

@SMOO

,. p t (JNITED STATES l g j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINCToN, D.C. 2066fM)o01 l

o%***** / November 23, 1998 l

l MEMORANDUM TO: Thomas H. Essig, Acting Ref Generic Issues and Envin.,nmental Projects Branch l Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Stewart L. Magruder, Project Manager SCMS %7

Generic Issues and Environmental Projects Branch 0 Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 12,1998, WITH THE LICENSING AND DESIGN BASES CLEARINGHOUSE On November 12,1998, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff met with the Licensing and Design Bases Clearinghouse at the offices of Winston & Strawn in Washington, D.C. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss recent activities related to 10 CFR 50.59 and the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR). Attachment i lists the meeting participants.

Attachment 2 is a copy of the staff presentation at the meeting.

During the meeting, the group discussed the status of industry and NRC initiatives related to 10 CFR 50.59, design bases per 10 CFR 50.2, and the UFSAR. The group discussed the relationship between industry and staff views on these topics and what steps could be taken to .

resolve any differences. I i

Attachments: As stated l 1

cc w/att: See next page i

L i

-) /,

l l List of Attendees l

Name Oraanization Russ Bell Nuclear Energy Institute Tony Pietrangelo Nuclear Energy Institute Robert Vincent Consumers Energy Co.

Mitchell Ross Florida Power & Light Mark Flaherty Rochester Gas & Electric Mario Robles Northeast Utilities Tom Milton Southern Nuclear Charlene Faison flew York Power Authority Getachew Tesfaye Baltimore Gas & Electric Stephen Nass Duquesne Light Edward Lemke Entergy Operations Bob Rybak Commonwealth Edison Daniel Maret %ctuoia Consulting Group Steve Bennett orgy Operations Lee Keller ae Energy Terry Garrett Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp.

Linda Dewhirst Nebraska Public Power District Jeff Keenan Public Service Electric & Gas Courtney Smyth Public Service Electric & Gas Kenneth Hutko Public Service Electric & Gas David Matthews Nuclear Regulatory Commission i

r

?

Attachment 1 I

, - - ~ 7-

/M 43x

/ 4

! M o

?yth!)}0 x4 q, o q t/

NRC STAFF AGiiVITIES CONCERNING g50.59 AND THE UFSAR November 12,1998 David Matthews Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i

Attachment 2 ,

RULE OBJECTIVES  !;

. Preserve integrity of licensing basis i

. Clarify requirements  !

  • when evaluation is required i
  • criteria for NRC approval

. Allow " minimal" chann,,es without aPProyal ,

?

2

KEY RULE ISSUES

. Definitions and formatting (Means of providing clarification)

- Change to the Facility as Described in the SAR

. (clarification of scope) ,

  • changes to design basis and safety analyses
  • additions

. Guidance on Minimal

  • for increases in probability and consequences 3

~.

KEY RULE ISSUES (CONT'D)

. Deletion of USQ term and " safety" evaluation

. Margin of Saf.ety

> definition of reduction in margin of safety (options)

. Safety Analysis Report

. > updates and pending changes

. Part 72 Changes i

4

..t

- f SRM ON SECY-98-171

. Publish proposed rule for 60 day comment period 4

(include SRM and votes in FR. notice) i

. Solicit comment on:

- wide array of options for margin of safety p

  • options for defining " minimal" for probability
  • definitions (e.g., facility, procedures...)
  • need for clear definition of " accident" i

. Schedule

- publish proposed rule in October

  • final rule to Commission February 19,1999

. Approved proposals on enforcement discretion

CHANGES TO FR NOTICE

. Discussion on "accidant"

. Options on m.argin ,

t

  • what are the margins
  • amount of reduction without approval
  • deletion of margin as a criterion .

i i

. Other inserts (voting record, request for comment) i i

i 6

MARGIN OPTIONS

. Control inputs to analyses that establish TS ,

requirements (nonconservative manner)

. Delete margin of safety as criterion

. Control results of safety analyses

  • fission product barriers
  • specified parameters
  • degree of change allowed (" minimal")
  • evaluation methods l

SCREENING EXPERIENCE

. Majority of violations for failure to perform evaluation (screening process was ineffective)

~

  • not known that FSAR was affected
  • de facto changes
  • maintenance

- combination of screening and assessment of impact l

4 4

4 8

e 4 O e STAFF ACT V TES CONCERNING THE UFSAR

~

i t

)

I t

I 6

k b

I 1

I f

r i

t-i f

a i

I 6

9

GOALS OF GUIDANCE

. Improve consistency in terms of licensees addressing appropriate new issues

. Provide required information, at appropriate level of detail, regardless of prior submittal

- Promote better application of 10 CFR 50.59

. Allow removal of information not required to be in a UFSAR

. In many cases, allow substitution of simplified schematics for detailed drawings 10

a'

~.'

FUTURE ACTIVITIES Endorsement review of NEl 98-03 in November 1998

. Draft regulatory guide to Commission in December 1998

- Issue for public comment by March 1999

. Final regulatory guide in September 1999

. Develop inspection guidance and train staff prior to implementation date (March 2000) 11

- - _ _ _ _ - - _ - - _ _ _ _ __ - ___- _ ____- ______- __ - ________ - - _ _ -__ - __- - _ __ - a

. 1 ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM 98-007 Issued September 15,1998, available at http ://www.n rc.g ov/O E/rp r/enfm a nleg m 98007.htm Based on current schedule, extends existing enforcement policy until March 30,2000, for information associated with SSCs of high safety significance, and March 30,2001, for all other information.

Schedule may change 12

ELECTRONIC SUBMil i AL OF UFSAR I

, . Agency implement new information management system in 1999, ADAMS Agency expects to have technological capability to receive electronic submittals in February 1999

  • lssueS:
  • electronic record 1
  • paper copies

- entire UFSAR versus replacement pages

  • changes to NRC processes, including regulations
. Need document creators / owners to be involve -'

j 13

f::

Nuclear Energy Institute Project No. 689 cc: Mr. Ralph Beedle Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Nuclear Energy Institute Suite 400 1776 i Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. Alex Marion, Director Programs Nuclear Energy institute Suite 400 1776 i Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. Anthony Pietrangelo, Director Licensing Nuclear Energy institute Suite 400 1776 i Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. Nicholas J. Liparulo, Manager Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Activities Nuclear and Advanced Technology Division Westinghouse Electric Corporation P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Director Washington Operations ABB-Combustion Engipeering, Inc.

12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 330 Rockville, Maryland 20852 i

i

9 r*

s. I

! i Distribution: Mtg. Summary w/ LDB Clearinghouse Dated November 23, 1998  ;

i i Hard Coov L =PUBLIC* -

PGEB R/F OGC l ACRS SMagruder DMatthews' EMail SCollins/FMiraglia

BSheron BBoger RZimmerman JRoe TEssig i FAkstulewicz j EMcKenna TBergman SMagruder GTracy, EDO l

l I-i  !

i i

d l

l

\  :

4 f

1 i 8 i , e

1. 1 i

i

- . - - - -. __ . - _ , _ - . , . _.- i