ML20091Q606: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:pr n 4,a% | ||
l V j David DeKok 113 Conoy St. | |||
Harrisburg, Pa. I7104 ' | |||
March 26,1995 Executive Director for Operations APPEAL bF INITIAL FOJA DEC Nuclear Regulatory Commission M~A b _T * | |||
* Wohington, D.C. 20555 Se/d 4-3-45 l | |||
Re: Appeal from Initial FOIA Dectston ; | |||
==Dear Sir:== | |||
) | |||
i- In a letter of Feb. 8.1995, I submitted a Freedom of Information Act request seeking all documents relating to an investigation conducted by the AEC's Region I Division of Compliance of alleged irregularities i connected with the construction of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant in | |||
. the late 1960s. My source of information about this investigation was a 1973 letter to Commissioner William O. Doub of the AEC (enclosed). i I was subsequently informed by Region I that no documents pursuant tc .- : inv ntiut:on could be located. It was suggested that any j linwngs c. suc. an investigation would have been included in l inspection reports for that period, which I was planning to loc!: at c under another FOI A request filed earlier. I accepted that argument i and told Region I to close out the request. The NRC Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Services subsequently sent me a letter closing out F0I A 95-68. | |||
l l However, when I examined the Ovster Creek inspection reports requested under F0I A 95-36. I found a cover letter (enclosed) for a report on an investigation that appeared to be the one I was looking | |||
: for. The report itself, however, was missing. The letter in question was | |||
! dated Nov. 4,1969, and was from J.P. O'Reilly, chief of reactor inspection, to D.J. Skovholt, assistant director for reactor operations. | |||
d 9509060037 950326 C PDR FOIA DEKOK95-A-10 PDR- | |||
._ _ _ __--__ _ __ ___ - _ .___ m | |||
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, I appeal and ask that a further search be conducted for the investigation report that was formerly attached to that cover letter. - | |||
Thank you for your attention to this request. | |||
Sincerely, David DeK'o k ) | |||
enc. | |||
l}} | |||
Revision as of 23:03, 12 May 2020
| ML20091Q606 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 03/26/1995 |
| From: | Dekok D AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| References | |
| FOIA-95-68, FOIA-95-A-10 NUDOCS 9509060037 | |
| Download: ML20091Q606 (2) | |
Text
pr n 4,a%
l V j David DeKok 113 Conoy St.
Harrisburg, Pa. I7104 '
March 26,1995 Executive Director for Operations APPEAL bF INITIAL FOJA DEC Nuclear Regulatory Commission M~A b _T *
- Wohington, D.C. 20555 Se/d 4-3-45 l
Re: Appeal from Initial FOIA Dectston ;
Dear Sir:
)
i- In a letter of Feb. 8.1995, I submitted a Freedom of Information Act request seeking all documents relating to an investigation conducted by the AEC's Region I Division of Compliance of alleged irregularities i connected with the construction of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant in
. the late 1960s. My source of information about this investigation was a 1973 letter to Commissioner William O. Doub of the AEC (enclosed). i I was subsequently informed by Region I that no documents pursuant tc .- : inv ntiut:on could be located. It was suggested that any j linwngs c. suc. an investigation would have been included in l inspection reports for that period, which I was planning to loc!: at c under another FOI A request filed earlier. I accepted that argument i and told Region I to close out the request. The NRC Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Services subsequently sent me a letter closing out F0I A 95-68.
l l However, when I examined the Ovster Creek inspection reports requested under F0I A 95-36. I found a cover letter (enclosed) for a report on an investigation that appeared to be the one I was looking
- for. The report itself, however, was missing. The letter in question was
! dated Nov. 4,1969, and was from J.P. O'Reilly, chief of reactor inspection, to D.J. Skovholt, assistant director for reactor operations.
d 9509060037 950326 C PDR FOIA DEKOK95-A-10 PDR-
._ _ _ __--__ _ __ ___ - _ .___ m
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, I appeal and ask that a further search be conducted for the investigation report that was formerly attached to that cover letter. -
Thank you for your attention to this request.
Sincerely, David DeK'o k )
enc.
l