|
|
Line 18: |
Line 18: |
| {{#Wiki_filter:÷A* U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH January 1982 Division 1 DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE AND VALUE/IMPACT STATEMENT Task IC 121-5 | | {{#Wiki_filter:÷A* U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH January 1982 Division 1 DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE AND VALUE/IMPACT STATEMENT Task IC 121-5 |
| ___*_ _ | | ___*_ _ |
| Contact: A.S. Hintze (301) 443-5966 RESPONSE-TIME TESTING OF PROTECTION SYSTEM INSTRUMENT CHANNELS A. INTRODUCTION Section 50.55a, "Codes and Standards," of 10 CFR Part 50,* *)Domestic Licens ing of Production and Utilization Facilities," requires, amon. other things, that means be provided for checking the operational availability of each protec tion system input sensor during reactor operation. This requirement results from the incorporation by reference of IEEE Std 279-1971, "Criteria for Protec tion Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations,"* by paragraph 50.55a(h). | | |
| | ==Contact:== |
| | A.S. Hintze (301) 443-5966 RESPONSE-TIME TESTING OF PROTECTION SYSTEM INSTRUMENT CHANNELS A. INTRODUCTION Section 50.55a, "Codes and Standards," of 10 CFR Part 50,* *)Domestic Licens ing of Production and Utilization Facilities," requires, amon. other things, that means be provided for checking the operational availability of each protec tion system input sensor during reactor operation. This requirement results from the incorporation by reference of IEEE Std 279-1971, "Criteria for Protec tion Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations,"* by paragraph 50.55a(h). |
| Criterion 21, "Protection System Reliability and Testability," of Appen dix A, "General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50 requires, in part, that protection systems be designed to permit periodic test ing during reactor operation. | | Criterion 21, "Protection System Reliability and Testability," of Appen dix A, "General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50 requires, in part, that protection systems be designed to permit periodic test ing during reactor operation. |
| Criterion XI, "Test Control," of Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50 requires, in part, that a test programi be established to ensure that all test ing required to demonstrate that structures, systems, and components will per form satisfactorily in service is identified and performed. | | Criterion XI, "Test Control," of Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50 requires, in part, that a test programi be established to ensure that all test ing required to demonstrate that structures, systems, and components will per form satisfactorily in service is identified and performed. |
|
---|
Category:Regulatory Guide
MONTHYEARML24038A3102024-04-30030 April 2024 Rev 1 Dedication of Commercial-Grade Items for Use in Nuclear Power Plants ML23286A2862024-02-0202 February 2024 Watermarked - DG-5078, Fatigue Management for Nuclear Power Plant Personnel -10-13-23 ML23286A2682024-02-0202 February 2024 Watermarked - DG-5074 - Access Authorization - Econcurrence Version Clean (02-03-23) ML23286A2512024-02-0202 February 2024 Watermarked DG-5073 - Fitness for Duty Program for Part 53 - 10-13-23 ML23286A2822024-02-0202 February 2024 Watermarked - DG-5076 - Physical Protection for Part 53 - 10-13-23 ML23286A2782024-02-0202 February 2024 Watermarked - DG-5075 - Cyber Security 10-13-23 ML23263A9972024-02-0202 February 2024 Watermarked - DG-5072 - Rev 0 of RG 5.90 - Guidance for Alternative Physical Security Requirements for Small Modular Reactors and Non-Light-Water Reactors ML23194A1942023-08-31031 August 2023 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1404, Revision 1 (RG 1.253 Rev 0) Guidance on Ticap for Non-LWRs ML22165A0722023-02-28028 February 2023 DG-4027, Draft Regulatory Guide 4.2 Supplement 1, Preparation of Environmental Reports for Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal Applications, Revision 2 ML23012A2422023-02-28028 February 2023 DG-1374 RG 1.152 Rev 4 Criteria for Programmable Digital Devices in Safety-Related Systems of Nuclear Power Plants ML23018A2932023-02-16016 February 2023 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1418 (RG 1.212 Rev 2), Sizing Large Lead-Acid Storage Batteries. (ACRS Copy) Regulatory Guide 5.892022-11-0101 November 2022 Rev.0, Fitness-for-Duty Programs for Commercial Power Reactor and Category I Special Nuclear Material Licensees ML22067A0142022-03-31031 March 2022 Rev 3 ACRS Spent Fuel Heat Generation in an ISFSI ML22048B8222022-02-18018 February 2022 DG-1389 (ACRS Version for 3-16-22 Meeting) - Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Power Reactors ML22040A0822021-10-30030 October 2021 Document to Support ACRS Subcommittee Meeting - Redline RG 1.57, Rev 3, Design Limits and Loading Combinations for Metal Primary Reactor Containment System Components ML21167A3512021-06-0101 June 2021 Rev 5 Final Watermarked for ACRS ML21092A1342021-05-0505 May 2021 Rev. 2 ACRS Version ML21092A1512021-05-0505 May 2021 Rev. 4 ACRS Version ML21181A2492021-04-30030 April 2021 Watermark for ACRS Fc Meeting RG 1.9 Rev 5 ML21006A3372021-04-0101 April 2021 Regulatory Analysis - DG 1381 - Control of Heavy Loads for Nuclear Facilities ML20168A8832021-04-0101 April 2021 DG-1371, Proposed Rev 6 of RG 1.26, Quality Group Classifications and Standards for Water-, Steam-, and Radioactive-Waste-Containing Components of Nuclear Power Plants ML21006A3352021-04-0101 April 2021 DG 1381 for Rev 0 of RG 1.244 - Control of Heavy Loads for Nuclear Facilities ML21083A2892021-02-28028 February 2021 Draft for Acrs Review ML21048A4482021-02-17017 February 2021 Rev. 2 ML20120A6332021-01-31031 January 2021 Design, Fabrication, and Materials Code Case Acceptability, ASME Section III, Revision 39, (DG-1366) ML21011A2312021-01-31031 January 2021 Rev 4 (Draft for ACRS Fc Review on 2-3-21) ML20120A6312021-01-31031 January 2021 Inservice Inspection Code Case Acceptability, ASME Section XI, Division 1, Revision 20, (DG-1367) ML20120A6272021-01-31031 January 2021 ASME Code Cases Not Approved for Use, Revision 7 (DG-1369) ML20120A6292021-01-31031 January 2021 Operation and Maintenance Code Case Acceptability, ASME OM Code, Revision 4, (DG-1368) ML21012A1972021-01-12012 January 2021 a Performance-Based Approach to Define the Site-Specific Earthquake Ground Motion, RG 1.208, Revision 0 Regulatory Guide 1.200, Acceptability of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Risk-Informed Activities2020-12-31031 December 2020 Acceptability of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Risk-Informed Activities ML20183A4232020-12-31031 December 2020 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1361 (Proposed Rev. 2 to Reg. Guide 1.89), Environmental Qualification of Certain Electrical Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants ML20238B8732020-12-29029 December 2020 Public Comment Resolutions on DG-1362 for RG 1.200, Acceptability of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Risk-Informed Activities ML20282A2982020-12-0404 December 2020 DG-3055, Rev 0, Regulatory Guide (RG) 3.76, Implementation of Aging Management Requirements for Spent Fuel Storage Renewals ML20282A2992020-12-0404 December 2020 Regulatory Analysis for DG-3055, Rev 0, Regulatory Guide (RG) 3.76, Implementation of Aging Management Requirements for Spent Fuel Storage Renewals ML20210M0472020-12-0101 December 2020 Draft Regulation Guide DG-1288: Plant-Specific, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking for Inservice Inspections of Piping ML20231A8562020-11-30030 November 2020 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1360, Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection for Existing Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants ML20231A8352020-11-30030 November 2020 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1359, Fire Protection for Nuclear Power Plants ML20307A0462020-11-0202 November 2020 Draft for ACRS Public Meeting, RG 1.200, R3, Acceptability of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Risk-Informed Activities ML20210M0442020-10-28028 October 2020 Regulatory Analysis: Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1288 - an Approach for Plant-Specific, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking for Inservice Inspection of Piping (Proposed Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.178, Dated September 2003) ML20154K5842020-09-17017 September 2020 Results of Periodic Review of Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.78 ML20182A7882020-08-31031 August 2020 DG 1373 for RG 1.240 - Fresh and Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Analyses ML20055G8232020-08-0707 August 2020 DG 1363 for Proposed Rev 4 to Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.105 - Setpoints for Safety-Related Instrumentation Regulatory Guide 3.152020-07-31031 July 2020 Regulatory Guide 3.15. Rev 2, Standard Format and Content of License Applications for Receipt and Storage of Unirradiated Power Reactor Fuel and Associated Radioactive Material at a Nuclear Power Plant Regulatory Guide 1.2362020-07-30030 July 2020 Draft for ACRS Review ML20119A6142020-04-28028 April 2020 Response to Comments for RG 1.236 for ACRS ML20105A4672020-04-14014 April 2020 Memo to OCA - for Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide 8.39, Release of Patients Administered Radioactive Material ML20099F0262020-04-0707 April 2020 Public Comment Resolution Table for DG 1341 (Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.188, Standard Format and Content for Applications to Renew Nuclear Power Plant Operating Licenses, Rev. 2 ML19206A4892020-02-0606 February 2020 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1287, an Approach for Plant-Specific, risk-Informed Decisionmaking: Technical Specifications ML19116A0772019-08-31031 August 2019 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-5040, Urine Specimen Collection and Test Results Review Under 10 CFR Part 26, Fitness for Duty Programs. 2024-04-30
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". Category:Draft
MONTHYEARML23263A9972024-02-0202 February 2024 Watermarked - DG-5072 - Rev 0 of RG 5.90 - Guidance for Alternative Physical Security Requirements for Small Modular Reactors and Non-Light-Water Reactors ML23286A2512024-02-0202 February 2024 Watermarked DG-5073 - Fitness for Duty Program for Part 53 - 10-13-23 ML23286A2682024-02-0202 February 2024 Watermarked - DG-5074 - Access Authorization - Econcurrence Version Clean (02-03-23) ML23286A2782024-02-0202 February 2024 Watermarked - DG-5075 - Cyber Security 10-13-23 ML23286A2822024-02-0202 February 2024 Watermarked - DG-5076 - Physical Protection for Part 53 - 10-13-23 ML23286A2862024-02-0202 February 2024 Watermarked - DG-5078, Fatigue Management for Nuclear Power Plant Personnel -10-13-23 ML23194A1942023-08-31031 August 2023 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1404, Revision 1 (RG 1.253 Rev 0) Guidance on Ticap for Non-LWRs ML23012A2422023-02-28028 February 2023 DG-1374 RG 1.152 Rev 4 Criteria for Programmable Digital Devices in Safety-Related Systems of Nuclear Power Plants ML22165A0722023-02-28028 February 2023 DG-4027, Draft Regulatory Guide 4.2 Supplement 1, Preparation of Environmental Reports for Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal Applications, Revision 2 ML23018A2932023-02-16016 February 2023 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1418 (RG 1.212 Rev 2), Sizing Large Lead-Acid Storage Batteries. (ACRS Copy) ML22067A0142022-03-31031 March 2022 Rev 3 ACRS Spent Fuel Heat Generation in an ISFSI ML22048B8222022-02-18018 February 2022 DG-1389 (ACRS Version for 3-16-22 Meeting) - Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Power Reactors ML22040A0822021-10-30030 October 2021 Document to Support ACRS Subcommittee Meeting - Redline RG 1.57, Rev 3, Design Limits and Loading Combinations for Metal Primary Reactor Containment System Components ML21181A2492021-04-30030 April 2021 Watermark for ACRS Fc Meeting RG 1.9 Rev 5 ML21006A3372021-04-0101 April 2021 Regulatory Analysis - DG 1381 - Control of Heavy Loads for Nuclear Facilities ML21006A3352021-04-0101 April 2021 DG 1381 for Rev 0 of RG 1.244 - Control of Heavy Loads for Nuclear Facilities ML20168A8832021-04-0101 April 2021 DG-1371, Proposed Rev 6 of RG 1.26, Quality Group Classifications and Standards for Water-, Steam-, and Radioactive-Waste-Containing Components of Nuclear Power Plants ML20120A6272021-01-31031 January 2021 ASME Code Cases Not Approved for Use, Revision 7 (DG-1369) ML20120A6312021-01-31031 January 2021 Inservice Inspection Code Case Acceptability, ASME Section XI, Division 1, Revision 20, (DG-1367) ML20120A6332021-01-31031 January 2021 Design, Fabrication, and Materials Code Case Acceptability, ASME Section III, Revision 39, (DG-1366) ML20120A6292021-01-31031 January 2021 Operation and Maintenance Code Case Acceptability, ASME OM Code, Revision 4, (DG-1368) ML20183A4232020-12-31031 December 2020 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1361 (Proposed Rev. 2 to Reg. Guide 1.89), Environmental Qualification of Certain Electrical Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants ML20210M0472020-12-0101 December 2020 Draft Regulation Guide DG-1288: Plant-Specific, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking for Inservice Inspections of Piping ML20231A8562020-11-30030 November 2020 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1360, Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection for Existing Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants ML20231A8352020-11-30030 November 2020 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1359, Fire Protection for Nuclear Power Plants ML20307A0462020-11-0202 November 2020 Draft for ACRS Public Meeting, RG 1.200, R3, Acceptability of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Risk-Informed Activities ML20210M0442020-10-28028 October 2020 Regulatory Analysis: Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1288 - an Approach for Plant-Specific, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking for Inservice Inspection of Piping (Proposed Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.178, Dated September 2003) ML20055G8232020-08-0707 August 2020 DG 1363 for Proposed Rev 4 to Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.105 - Setpoints for Safety-Related Instrumentation NUREG-1575, Rev. 2, Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (Marssim), Draft for Public Comment2020-05-31031 May 2020 NUREG-1575, Rev. 2, Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (Marssim), Draft for Public Comment ML21008A5742020-05-31031 May 2020 Appendices to Marssim Revision 2 Draft for Public Comment ML20119A6142020-04-28028 April 2020 Response to Comments for RG 1.236 for ACRS ML19206A4892020-02-0606 February 2020 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1287, an Approach for Plant-Specific, risk-Informed Decisionmaking: Technical Specifications ML19116A0772019-08-31031 August 2019 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-5040, Urine Specimen Collection and Test Results Review Under 10 CFR Part 26, Fitness for Duty Programs. ML19045A4352019-05-31031 May 2019 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1356, Guidance for Implementation of 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Test and Experiments. ML16172A2402019-04-30030 April 2019 Draft Regulatory Guide (DG)-1283, Safety Related Concrete Structures for Nuclear Power Plants ML17258A5792019-04-30030 April 2019 DG-1284, Anchoring Components and Structural Supports in Concrete ML19042A1722019-03-31031 March 2019 Draft Regulatory Guide (DG)-7010, Leakage Tests on for Shipment of Radioactive Material ML18158A3032019-01-31031 January 2019 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1352, Instrument Sensing Lines ML18087A1692018-10-31031 October 2018 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-4019, Environmental Dosimetry - Performance Specifications, Testing, and Data Analysis ML18087A1672018-10-31031 October 2018 DG-4019 Reg Analysis ML18016A1292018-08-31031 August 2018 Draft Regulatory Guide (DG)-5061, Cyber Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors. ML18232A5002018-08-31031 August 2018 Marked Up Draft Regulatory Guide for Cyber Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors. (Rdlso - Rg 5.71 Rev. 0 Vs DG-5061) ML18234A0962018-08-31031 August 2018 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-5057, Special Nuclear Material Control and Accounting System for Non-Fuel Cycle Facilities ML17353A7272018-06-30030 June 2018 Draft Regulatory Guide (DG) 1349, Standard Format and Content for Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report. ML18086A6902018-06-30030 June 2018 Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1351, Dispositioning of Technical Specifications That Are Insufficient to Ensure Plant Safety ML17348B4852018-06-30030 June 2018 Draft Regulatory Guide (DG) 1348, Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Production or Utilization Facilities. ML17347A7942018-06-30030 June 2018 Draft Regulatory Guide (DG) 1347, Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors. ML16091A2672018-02-28028 February 2018 Draft Regulatory Guide (DG)-1329, Proposed Revision 4 to Regulatory Guide Rg 1.8, Qualification and Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants. Regulatory Guide 1.2322018-02-27027 February 2018 Guidance for Developing Principal Design Criteria for Non-Light-Water Reactors ML16165A2982017-07-31031 July 2017 Draft Guide (DG) - 1291 Evaluating Deviations and Reporting Defects and Noncompliance Under 10 CFR Part 21 2024-02-02
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". |
Text
÷A* U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH January 1982 Division 1 DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE AND VALUE/IMPACT STATEMENT Task IC 121-5
___*_ _
Contact:
A.S. Hintze (301) 443-5966 RESPONSE-TIME TESTING OF PROTECTION SYSTEM INSTRUMENT CHANNELS A. INTRODUCTION Section 50.55a, "Codes and Standards," of 10 CFR Part 50,* *)Domestic Licens ing of Production and Utilization Facilities," requires, amon. other things, that means be provided for checking the operational availability of each protec tion system input sensor during reactor operation. This requirement results from the incorporation by reference of IEEE Std 279-1971, "Criteria for Protec tion Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations,"* by paragraph 50.55a(h).
Criterion 21, "Protection System Reliability and Testability," of Appen dix A, "General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50 requires, in part, that protection systems be designed to permit periodic test ing during reactor operation.
Criterion XI, "Test Control," of Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50 requires, in part, that a test programi be established to ensure that all test ing required to demonstrate that structures, systems, and components will per form satisfactorily in service is identified and performed.
This regulatory guide describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the Commission's regulations with regard to response-time test ing of instrumentation in protection systems.
'Copies may be obtained from the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, United Engineering Center, 345 East 97th Street, New York, New York 10017.
This regulatory guide and the associated value/impact statement are being issued in draft form to involve the public in the early stages of the development of a regulatory position in this area. They have not received complete staff review and do not represent an official NRC staff position.
Public comments are being solicited on both drafts, the guide (including any implementation schedule) and the value/impact statement. Comments on the value/impact statement should be accompanied by supporting data. Comments on both drafts should be sent to the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, Attention: Docketing and Service Branch, bVAR 31 IM Requests for single copies of draft guides (which may be reproduced) or for placement on an automatic distribution list for single copies of future draft guides in specific divisions should be made writing to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, Attention: in Director, Division of Technical Information and Document Control.
B. DISCUSSION The licensee of a nuclear power plant is required to develop a test program to ensure that structures, systems, and components will perform satisfactorily in service. This program must include the capability for checking the opera tional availability of each protection system and its components. Periodic testing is needed, not only to discover protection system component failure, but to ensure that the protection systems and their components are in a condi tion that will provide agreed-upon performance. Response time is one of the minimum performance requirements specified for protection systems in Sec tion 3(9)(a) of IEEE Std 279-1971.
ISA-dS67.06, "Response Time Testing of Nuclear-Safety-Related Instrument Channels in Nuclear Power Plants," 2 was prepared by a committee of the Instru ment Society of America (ISA). This standard delineates requirements and methods for determining the response-time characteristics of pressure and temperature channels in a nuclear power plant. Draft 0 of ISA-dS67.06 was approved by the ISA Nuclear Power Plant Standards Committee on October 21, 1980.
C. REGULATORY POSITION The requirements in Draft 0 of ISA-dS67.06, "Response Time Testing of Nuclear-Safety-Related Instrument Channels in Nuclear Power Plants," dated October 21, 1980, provide a basis acceptable to the NRC staff for meeting the requirements for response-time testing of instrument channels that use pressure or temperature measurements in nuclear power plant protection systems subject to the following:
- 1. The term "nuclear-safety-related instrument channels" as used in ISA-dS67.06 should, for the purposes of this guide, be understood to mean those instrument channels in protection systems.
- 2. In Section 6.3 of ISA-dS67.06, which pertains to calibration verifica tion with respect to response-time testing, the recommendation in the last sentence should be treated as a requirement.
2 Copies may be obtained from the Instrument Society of America, 67 Alexander Drive, P.O. Box 12277, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
2
- 3. Section 10.0, "Test Results," of ISA-dS67.06 requires that an investi gation be made as to the cause if a rate of change in response-time character istics is such that the allowable response time will be exceeded prior to the next test. The investigation should be made if the rate of change in response time characteristics is such that the allowable response time may be exceeded prior to the next test.
D. IMPLEMENTATION The purpose of this section is to provide information to applicants and licensees regarding the NRC staff's plans for using thisregulatory guide.
This proposed guide has been released to encourage public participation in its development. Except in those cases in which an applicant or licensee proposes an acceptable alternative method for complying with specified portions of the Commission's regulations, the method to be described in the active guide reflecting public comments will be used by the NRC staff in its evaluation of applicants' and licensees' programs for response-time testing of protection system instrument channels after the implementation date to be specified in the active guide. Implementation by the staff will in no case be earlier than June 1982.
3
DRAFT VALUE/IMPACT STATEMENT
- 1. THE PROPOSED ACTION The licensee of a nuclear power plant is required by the Commission's regula tions to develop a test program to ensure that systems and components will perform satisfactorily in service. Specific guidance is needed for testing instrument channels of protection systems to determine response-time characteristics in order that the degradation in performance of instrument channels can be detected and maintenance can be performed to keep the channels within acceptable limits.
Regulatory Guide 1.118, "Periodic Testing of Electric Power and Protection Systems," provides basic guidance for response-time testing. More definitive guidance, however, has been developed by the Instrument Society of America (ISA) in Draft 0 of ISA-dS67.06, "Response Time Testing of Nuclear-Safety-Related Instrument Channels in Nuclear Power Plants," dated October 21, 1980. The proposed action would endorse ISA-dS67.06, with appropriate supplementary mate rial, in a regulatory guide.
- 2. VALUE/IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2.1 General The proposed action would provide definitive guidance for determining the response-time characteristics of instrument channels in protection systems.
Value The value of the proposed action would be more effective tests and better surveillance of the performance of instrumentation in protection systems.
Endorsing a national consensus standard reduces the expenditure of staff resources in developing the guidance.
Impact Most of the impact on industry has already occurred during development, review, and approval of the consensus standard. Additional impact associated with the NRC endorsement of the standard should be minimal.
4
2.2 Regulatory Position 2 Regulatory Position 2 was included to state that the recommendation in the standard to evaluate the effect of calibration adjustment on response-time characteristics should be considered as a requirement.
Value Since instrumentation calibration may not be performed in conjunction with response-time testing (or vice versa), it is important that possible effects on response time caused by instrument calibration be determined. An evaluation of these effects would permit adjustments to be made at the time of calibration to keep the response time within acceptable limits.
Impact There should be no impact because the regulations require that the response time characteristics of instrument channels be maintained within acceptable limits.
2.3 Regulatory Position 3 Regulatory Position 3 was included to call for an investigation to determine the cause if the rate of change in response-time characteristics is such that the allowable response time may be exceeded prior to the next scheduled test.
Value Prediction of when response time will be unacceptable in the future is not an exact science. When it is determined that the rate at which the response time characteristics appear to be deteriorating is such that the response time may be out of limits before the next test, an investigation as to the cause would permit preventive maintenance or repairs that could prevent a failure.
Impact There should be no impact because the regulations require that the response time characteristics of instrument channels be maintained within acceptable limits.
5
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20555 POSTAGE AND FEES PAID U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY OFFICIAL BUSINESS COMMISSION PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE. $300