ML072570692: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:September 14, 2007Ms. Rebecca ThomsonRAC Chair & Branch Chief, REP ProgramFEMA, Region IIDepartment of Homeland Security26 Federal Plaza, 13 th FloorNew York, NY 10278
{{#Wiki_filter:September 14, 2007 Ms. Rebecca Thomson RAC Chair & Branch Chief, REP Program FEMA, Region II Department of Homeland Security 26 Federal Plaza, 13th Floor New York, NY 10278


==Dear Ms. Thomson:==
==Dear Ms. Thomson:==


We appreciate the time that you and other FEMA associates spent with us on September 13, 2007, to discuss your letter of September 12, 2007, with members of the NRCstaff. It is the NRC's understanding that the interferences with the existing siren system,discussed on page five of the analysis attached to the letter, do not degrade the effectiveness ofthe existing siren system to such a degree that FEMA no longer has reasonable assurance thatthe existing siren system protects the public health and safety. We would appreciate yourconfirmation via correspondence of our understanding or, in the event we have misunderstoodFEMA's view, a correct statement of your position.Thank you for your assistance in this matter.Sincerely,Samuel J. CollinsRegional Administrator cc:V. Quinn, FEMA, Acting Division Director for Technological Hazards  
We appreciate the time that you and other FEMA associates spent with us on September 13, 2007, to discuss your letter of September 12, 2007, with members of the NRC staff. It is the NRC's understanding that the interferences with the existing siren system, discussed on page five of the analysis attached to the letter, do not degrade the effectiveness of the existing siren system to such a degree that FEMA no longer has reasonable assurance that the existing siren system protects the public health and safety. We would appreciate your confirmation via correspondence of our understanding or, in the event we have misunderstood FEMAs view, a correct statement of your position.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely, Samuel J. Collins Regional Administrator cc:
V. Quinn, FEMA, Acting Division Director for Technological Hazards


ML072570692 After declaring this document "An Official Agency Record" it will/will not be released to the Public.To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box:
ML072570692 After declaring this document An Official Agency Record it will/will not be released to the Public.
" C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure   " E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure   " N" = No copyOFFICER/DRSHQ/NSIRHQ/OGCRI/RANAMEDRobertsBMcDermott/via teleconJMoore/via teleconSCollinsDATE09/14/0709/14/0709/14/0709/14/07}}
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE              R/DRS                      HQ/NSIR                        HQ/OGC                  RI/RA NAME                DRoberts                  BMcDermott/via telecon        JMoore/via telecon      SCollins DATE                09/14/07                  09/14/07                      09/14/07                09/14/07}}

Revision as of 02:38, 23 November 2019

Letter to Rebecca Thomson, FEMA, Region II, Dated 09/14/07 Regarding Indian Point Siren System
ML072570692
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  
Issue date: 09/14/2007
From: Collins S
Region 1 Administrator
To: Thomson R
US Dept of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency
References
Download: ML072570692 (2)


Text

September 14, 2007 Ms. Rebecca Thomson RAC Chair & Branch Chief, REP Program FEMA, Region II Department of Homeland Security 26 Federal Plaza, 13th Floor New York, NY 10278

Dear Ms. Thomson:

We appreciate the time that you and other FEMA associates spent with us on September 13, 2007, to discuss your letter of September 12, 2007, with members of the NRC staff. It is the NRC's understanding that the interferences with the existing siren system, discussed on page five of the analysis attached to the letter, do not degrade the effectiveness of the existing siren system to such a degree that FEMA no longer has reasonable assurance that the existing siren system protects the public health and safety. We would appreciate your confirmation via correspondence of our understanding or, in the event we have misunderstood FEMAs view, a correct statement of your position.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Sincerely, Samuel J. Collins Regional Administrator cc:

V. Quinn, FEMA, Acting Division Director for Technological Hazards

ML072570692 After declaring this document An Official Agency Record it will/will not be released to the Public.

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE R/DRS HQ/NSIR HQ/OGC RI/RA NAME DRoberts BMcDermott/via telecon JMoore/via telecon SCollins DATE 09/14/07 09/14/07 09/14/07 09/14/07